Ezequiel Simmermacher
Analyst · Brookline Capital Markets
Thank you, Federico, for the introduction, and good morning, everyone. It is great to be here in my first earnings call with Bioceres. Let's begin with Slide 6, which, as Federico mentioned, detail the impact of the January 2026 foreclosure auction involving the Pro Farm Group on our financials. As a result of the foreclosure process, the Pro Farm business was classified as discontinued operations and its assets and liabilities were reclassified accordingly in our financial statements. Based on the expected proceeds from the foreclosure auction, the company recognized a noncash impairment and loss associated with the transaction during the second quarter of fiscal year 2026. In total, approximately $194 million of the net assets associated with the Pro Farm Group business was recognized or reclassified. After considering the $15 million credit bid submitted by noteholders, this results in accumulated noncash loss of approximately $179 million. The largest impact were reductions in intangible assets and goodwill, together with reductions in property, plant and equipment and working capital balance. These were partially offset by the derecognition of liabilities associated with the Pro Farm Group business. These impacts were recognized in the second quarter and are reflected in the current balance sheet presentations. Now let's walk through the financial results for the quarter. And first, let me remind you that all financial results discussed below reflect the company's continuing operations for all periods presented and previous year's amounts have been recast to exclude the Pro Farm Group business unless otherwise noted. Let's turn to Slide 7 to begin looking at revenues. Total revenues for the quarter were $39.4 million, representing a 23% decline versus the same period last year. Before discussing the segments, I think it's important to remember that the fiscal third quarter is seasonally the lowest quarter for our continuous operation, particularly following the Pro Farm foreclosure auction and the resulting reduction in North America operations. This quarter typically coincides with lower planting and harvesting activities in the Southern Hemisphere, meaning that fluctuation in demand, pricing and product mix tend to have a more visible impact on quarterly performance. Looking at segment performance, we saw a mixed dynamic across the portfolio. In Crop Protection, revenue were $24.6 million, down 18% year-over-year. The decline was mainly driven by softened demand and competitive pressure in certain categories, particularly in adjuvants and third-party products in Argentina. We also continue to see inventory adjustments across the nutrition channel, which affected purchasing activity. In third-party products, pricing pressure in both patent categories also weighted on revenues. In Seeds and Integrated Products revenues declined 71% year-over-year. This continues the trend we've seen over the last several quarters as downstream seeds and grain sales are phased out as part of the strategic shift towards a more asset-light and lower working capital-intense model in seeds. As we've discussed before, this transition reduced reported revenues in the near term while also lowering exposure to lower margin and more working capital-intense activity. Crop Nutrition was the one segment that posted growth during the quarter, with revenues increased 15% year-over-year to $11.6 million. Growth was mainly driven by micro fertilizer supported by a low comparable base and stronger demand dynamics during the quarter amid global supply and pricing uncertainties associated with geopolitical tensions. Overall, revenue performance during the quarter reflects a combination of softer market conditions in certain categories together with ongoing portfolio transition effects. Moving now to gross profit on Slide 8. Gross profit for the quarter was $12.7 million compared to $18.1 million in the same period last year, representing a 30% year-over-year decline. The decline was relatively broad-based across the 3 segments. In Crop Protection, gross profit performance largely mirrored the decline in revenues. Margins across the different product categories were generally stable, although overall segment margin came down from 37% to 35%, mainly due to the lower contribution from adjuvants within the mix this quarter. In Seeds and Integrated Products, gross profit declined in absolute terms, but significantly less than revenues. As a result, gross margin improved from 19% to 30%, reflecting a more favorable mix with a higher relative contribution from seed treatment packs versus downstream grain sales. Finally, Crop Nutrition gross profit declined 38% despite higher revenues. The main driver here was obsolescence adjustment related to inoculants following an update inventory assessment during this quarter. Excluding this adjustment, underlying profitability in the inoculants business remained broadly stable year-over-year. Overall, gross margin declined from 35% to 32%, reflecting lower revenues, product mix effects and inoculants adjustment disclosed above. Excluding that nonrecurring adjustment, underlying gross margin performance remains broadly in line with the prior year period. Now let's please turn to Slide 9 for a review of the adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was negative $0.6 million compared to positive $9.1 million in the prior year quarter. When looking at this year-over-year comparison, it is important to separate a couple of nonrecurring items affecting comparability across periods. First, the prior year quarter included approximately $7.7 million of nonrecurring other income associated with changes in contractual obligations and intellectual property arrangements as part of the recognition -- reorganization in Seeds. The absence of that income had a significant impact on comparability versus last year. Second, during the current quarter, Crop Nutrition results were impacted by a nonrecurring inoculant obsolescence adjustment associated with an updated inventory assessment. Looking beyond these items, underlying operations performance reflects lower gross profit across part of the business, particularly in Crop Protection, although the deterioration was partially offset by continuous progress on cost control, organizational streamlining initiatives. These actions resulted in a meaningful reduction in operation expense during the quarter, while joint ventures results also improved year-over-year and provided an additional positive contribution to EBITDA. Finally, let's turn to Slide #10 to review our balance sheet, cash position and a brief update on the debt situation. As of March 31, 2026, total financial debt stood at approximately $229 million, broadly stable compared to the previous quarter. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled approximately $14 million, resulting in a net financial debt of approximately $214 million, also stable on a sequential basis. One important point to highlight is that following the acceleration notice received in connection with the noteholder situation discussed earlier in the call, substantially all of the related debt is currently classified as short term in our balance sheet presentation. As Federico and Jose previously noted, the company continues to dispute both the purported acceleration of the notes and the commercial reasonable of the Pro Farm foreclosure action. These matters remain subject to ongoing legal proceeding, and the company intends to continue vigorously defending its position and pursuing its claim and counterclaims in the litigation. At the same time, we continue to evaluate constructive alternatives and maintaining dialogue with relevant stakeholders where appropriate. As Federico mentioned earlier, we are also advancing a reprofiling process for Rizobacter debt obligation in Argentina, including voluntary maturity extensions, discussions with bondholders and continued coordination with key banking partners. More broadly, management remains highly focused on liquidity preservation, working capital discipline and tighter capital allocation across the organization as we continue to stabilize the platform and improve financial flexibility over time. With that, I will turn the call back over to Federico. Thank you.