Thank you, Federico. Let's look at the financial results for the quarter. Please turn to Slide 5, starting with revenues. Total revenues for the quarter were $77.5 million, a 17% decline versus the same period last year. The decline reflects to a large degree, the strategy communicated in previous quarters, transitioning our seed business toward a more scalable and capital-efficient model and deprioritizing lower-margin working capital-intensive sales. Results were also shaped by sales timing effects in some Latin American countries, particularly Uruguay and an uneven recovery in Argentina. Looking at performance by segment, most of the reduction came from Crop Protection and Seed and Integrated Products. Crop Protection revenues were $39.9 million, a 16% decline with respect to the same quarter last year. This decline is explained by still sluggish demand in Argentina, where while there are generally signs of normalization compared to an unusually weak prior year, tight credit conditions and uncertainty ahead of the midterm elections that were held in late October implied that normalization was slower to materialize despite favorable weather and planting conditions. Outside Argentina, lower sales of bioprotection products in the U.S. and adjuvants in Brazil also weighed in on segment results, reflecting timing of sales that is expected to even out over the coming quarters. In Seed and Integrated Products, revenues were $12.6 million, a 37% decline compared to last year. This performance is an expected outcome from the unwinding of the HB4 downstream program. We expect this revenue decline in seeds to continue for at least 2 more quarters as we compare against quarters where seeds inventory was being sold off. While this transition is temporarily lowers revenue recognition, it improves working capital and supports a more profitable business model going forward. Finally, in Crop Nutrition, revenues were $25.1 million, broadly in line with last year. Within this segment, higher biostimulant sales in Argentina and Brazil were offset by weaker fertilizer dynamics. In contrast to the past year, demand for micro-beaded fertilizers improved in Argentina, particularly in terms of volumes, supported by strong corn planting intentions. But there were delayed purchases in Paraguay and Uruguay that offset these gains and resulted in a modest 2% year-over-year decline for the segment. Let's move on to the next slide to look at profitability. Gross profit for the quarter was $36.2 million, a decrease of 3% year-over-year, much smaller than the decline in revenues, reflecting improved product mix and margin expansion. As Federico mentioned, gross margin expanded significantly this quarter at 47% versus 40% in the same quarter last year. Looking at this by segment. In Crop Protection, gross profit was $17.6 million, a 5% decrease with respect to last year, with gross margin improving from 39% to 44%. This reflects a more favorable product mix within the portfolio, where there were stronger contributions from adjuvant and bioprotection products as well as efficiency gains that reduced unit costs in products such as adjuvants. In Seed and Integrated Products, gross profit was $7.5 million, slightly higher than last year despite the lower revenue. Segment margin expanded substantially from 36% to 60% as very low-margin seed sales were nearly phased out and higher-margin seed treatment packs represented a greater share of total segment sales. Margins on these packs also expanded during the quarter, further lifting profitability. Finally, gross profit in Crop Nutrition was $11.1 million, a 6% decline with respect to last year, with gross margin decreasing from 46% to 44%. Margin compression resulted mainly from competitive pricing in fertilizers in Argentina, where sales volumes increased, but market prices declined. In addition, revenues under the Syngenta agreement included a higher proportion from the supply agreement relative to the profit sharing agreement. Increased products supplied to Syngenta typically precedes revenue recognition under the profit sharing agreement, creating some quarterly lumpiness that evens out on an annual basis. Please turn to the next slide to look at EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $13.6 million, a 61% increase compared to $8.5 million in the same period last year, reflecting a material improvement in operating performance. The increase was largely driven by the $5.9 million reduction in operating costs described earlier by Federico. Joint venture results also contributed positively, adding $0.9 million as the fertilizer business began to recover from prior quarter's weakness. Gross margin expansion further supported the results with the contribution from gross profit only $1.1 million lower despite a much larger decline in revenues. Finally, let's turn to the next slide to review our balance sheet, cash position and a brief update on the debt situation. For that, I will hand the call back to Federico.