Paul Herendeen
Analyst · Evercore ISI
Thank you, Joe, I'm going to start on Slide 7, the top level financial results for the quarter. Before I begin, I want to point out that when we talk about organic growth that means on a constant-currency basis and removing the impact of divestitures and discontinuations in the comparative period. One other note, on the Q3 call, I referenced our initiative to reduce the level of channel inventories of our branded U.S. pharma products that would have the effect of reducing our revenues in Q4 and for the full year 2018 by an estimated $100 million. As it turned out, the actual result was a $76 million drag on revenue that was spread across all 4 of our segments. I'm going to reference this item a lot, and we've included a slide in the appendix that shows the impact on revenue and profit by segment. Okay. Let's go. We had a very strong finish to 2018. We posted our fourth consecutive quarter of organic growth despite the completed channel inventory reduction. Q4 revenue was up 1% organically and would have been up 5%, but for the channel inventory reduction, a good stuff. The B + L segment comprising 57% of our revenue was up 5% organically, with 4 of the 5 businesses within that segment delivering organic growth. Salix was up 1% organically despite the dramatic impact of the channel inventory reduction on the Salix segment. Ortho Derm was down 2% and Diversified was down 9% organically. Stepping down to gross profit and gross margin, we post a 150 basis point improvement in gross margin. A good chunk of the improvement was due to mix, but we also realized a meaningful improvement in our supply chain efficiency, driven by the ongoing efforts of Dennis Asharin, our Head of Global Manufacturing and his team. Over the last couple of years, the manufacturing team working together with Dr. Louis Yu and our quality organization, have been implementing a right first-time ethos that has decreased costs and reduced supply chain disruptions. Down in operating expenses, if you look at the reported selling, advertising and promotion line, it looks like we reduced those expenses by 4%. But adjusting for currency and divested businesses in the prior year, we actually spent more on our go-forward business in Q4 of '18 versus '17, mainly additional sales resources and promotional dollars to drive longer-term growth. This will be a theme for us in 2019, and that's why I'm framing it for you here. G&A was flat on a constant-currency basis and reflects our ongoing efforts to control costs that don't directly drive revenue. Investment in R&D meanwhile, was up $30 million compared with Q4 of '17. Consistent and increase investment in R&D is a significant part of the ongoing transformation of our company and is integral to our ability to drive long-term organic growth across our core businesses. At the operating profit lines, adjusted EBITA and adjusted EBITDA, we were basically flat organically versus the prior year quarter. Pretty impressive if you think about the $30 million year-over-year increase investment in R&D and the $65 million negative impact of a channel inventory reduction. The low operating profit, net interest expense was down versus Q4 of '17 by $33 million and our tax rate on adjusted earnings was 3.2% versus 5.8% in the prior year. Those items account for our Q4 adjusted net income growing at a faster pace than operating earnings. As I said earlier, a good strong finish to 2018. As I go through the 4 segments, I'm going to focus mainly on revenue. Starting on Slide 8, with B + L/International. Really good quarter, 4 of the 5 businesses delivered organic growth and the one that didn't, Global Optho Rx would have grown 5%, if not for the channel inventory reduction. From a growth perspective, Global Vision Care was the star, up 12% organically led by the U.S. business that was up 23%, driven by the impact of increased promotional resources we deployed beginning back in 2017 and the successful launch of expanded parameters of Biotrue ONEday toric. International Vision Care also delivered strong growth, up 8%, driven by strength in SofLens daily disposables, ultra-monthly SPS and cosmetic lenses. Geographically, International Vision Care was up 11% organically in China and 9% organically in Japan. Global Surgical was up 4% organically, up 6% outside the United States and plus 1% in the U.S. A quick comment here. The international surgical business representing roughly 70% of Global Surgical has delivered consistent organic growth over the last 7 to 8 quarters, while the U.S. surgical business only recently returned to growth in the second half of 2018. As the U.S. part of the business continues to deliver more consistent results, the Global Surgical business can deliver better growth that we've observed over the last 2 years. The Global Consumer business was up 4% organically, led by the U.S., that was up 8% on strength in our eye vitamins and the successful launch of LUMIFY. Outside the United States, consumer was up 1% as strength in our Latam cluster from new product launches was partly offset by lower demand for our topical products in the Russia. The Global Ophtho Rx business declined 1% organically on a 4% volume decline, driven entirely by the channel inventory reduction in the U.S. The Global Ophtho Rx business would have grown 5% versus Q4 of '17, but for that channel inventory reduction and that growth would have been basically split between increased volume and increased net realized selling prices. International Pharma, which is our branded generics business in Eastern Europe, Russia, Canada, Africa, Middle East and Latam rebounded after 4 quarters of subpar performance. You may recall that I previously called out some of the challenges we faced in our Eastern European Russian cluster and that I suggest that we would start to see improvement there based on changes we made in organization and leadership. While it's too soon to declare victory, our Russian business turned around from being a growth drag earlier in the year to being a significant contributor to the 8% organic growth of this business in Q4. A quick tip of the hat to John Connolly and Vladimir Gudkov for their efforts. Meanwhile, in Africa, Middle East that cluster continues to deliver strong growth led by Amoun, which was up 25% organically for the quarter and 19% for the full year. We have a great team at Amoun, and we look forward to seeing that team leverage its competitive strengths to drive increased business not only in Egypt but ultimately, in other Middle Eastern markets. On to Slide 9, in Salix. Salix took the brunt of the impact of the planned channel inventory reduction, $47 million and absorbed the impact of the mid-year loss of the exclusivity of UCERIS and still delivered 1% organic growth. Excluding the channel inventory reduction, Salix would have grown 12% versus Q4 '17, driven by XIFAXAN where TRxs were up 8% in the quarter versus the prior year quarter. The nidus of Salix performance is the team, including Mark McKenna, Nicola Kayel and Josh Coyle. They have performed at a very high level. Note that the Salix segment was one of the major beneficiaries of our improved gross profit margin, up some 290 basis points versus Q4 '17, due to mix and manufacturing efficiencies. On to Slide 10, in the Ortho Dermatologics segment. The segment was down 2% organically, as spectacular growth in Global Solta was more than offset by an 11% decline in the medical dermatology business. Solta was up 32%, driven mainly by the successful rollout of Thermage FLX, but also basic better fundamental performance across many of our regions under the terrific leadership of Tom Hart in his canorous Aussie accent. To wrap up the Q4 segment discussion, turn to Slide 11 in the Diversified Products. The segment was down 9% organically. Absent the channel inventory reduction, Diversified would have been down a rather modest 5% organically. Pretty good when considering the $41 million drag from the LOE products versus Q4 of '17 fell in the neuro segment there -- business there. Our generics business was a star performer based on 2 factors. First, the launch of authorized generics for our branded products that lost exclusivity. In Q4 '18 versus Q4 '17, the big contributors were UCERIS AG and Elidel AG. And second, the generics team led by Mary Saharyan worked closely with our supply chain to capitalize on market opportunities across our generics portfolio, not just in the quarter, but throughout the year. The generics business was up 18% versus Q4 '17 mostly on volume, but we were able to get some positive contribution from price too, a really good job. Flip to the full year 2018 versus '17 on Slide 12. The themes are similar to what we saw in Q4. Revenue was up 2% on an organic basis and would have been up 3%, but for the $76 million impact of the completed channel inventory reduction. Salix led the way from a growth perspective, up 12% would have been 15%, if not for the channel inventory reduction. We posted really strong growth with XIFAXAN, APRISO and the RELISTOR franchise that was slightly offset by the impact of the July LOE for UCERIS. B + L/International was up 4% organically versus 2017 with all 5 businesses delivering organic growth. The Ortho Dermatologics segment was down 13%, as Global Solta's plus 22% growth versus the prior year was more than offset by the continued rebasing of the medical dermatology business. Finally, Diversified posted a 5% organic decline, modest compared with the 24% decline we saw in 2017 as the growth drag of the LOE assets moderated in 2018 and was offset in part by the solid 19% growth in the generics business. Note the gross margin improvement versus 2017 roughly 110 basis points, same things as we saw in Q4, mix and supply chain efficiency. We reduced G&A by some 6% on a constant-currency basis, partly on reduced legal expenses. Finally, we increased our investment in R&D by some 15%, with the expectation that we'll continue to invest more in R&D in 2019 versus '18. Adjusted EBITDA was up 3% organically to $3.474 billion despite the $65 million drag of the completed channel inventory reduction. Pretty good, right? Adjusted net income grew faster organically than adjusted EBITDA as our net interest expense decreased $154 million compared with 2017, due to our successful and continuing efforts to reduce debt. And we saw a decrease in our tax rate on adjusted pretax earnings from 13.2% in 2017 to 8.4% in 2018. Turning to the balance sheet summary slide on Slide 13. You see the progression of our debt balance since last year. Debt is down $1.12 billion from the end of 2017. We ended the year with $24.6 billion of debt, $723 million of cash and a modest $75 million outstanding under our revolving credit facility. After year-end, we did prepay another $100 million of debt. On to Slide 14, in our cash flow summary. Cash provided by operating activities for the full year totaled $1.501 billion. In the first half of the year, the settlement of several legacy legal cases reduced that amount by roughly $225 million. So for the year, our cash provided by operating activities was in line with our expectations. Sequentially, our cash provided by operating activities went from $522 million in Q3 to $319 million in Q4. Note that as a result of refinancing debt, roughly 1/3 of our cash interest is now paid in each of Q2 and Q4. Looking backward, the settlement of interest had been relatively consistent across the 4 quarters. This change had a meaningful impact on the phasing of cash generated by operating activities in Q4 versus Q3 and that will continue in the future. Shifting to our guidance for 2019. The particulars of our guidance are spelled out on Slide 15. The highlights, we're expecting revenue in the range of $8.3 billion to $8.5 million and adjusted EBITDA in the range of $3.35 billion to $3.50 billion. Our guidance implies organic revenue growth in the range of flat to plus 3% and organic growth of adjusted EBITDA from minus 2% to plus 2% when compared with 2018. There's a bridge from 2018 actuals to our guidance on Slide 16. The very strong finish to 2018 took a bit of a top off of our growth expectations for 2018, but we'll take the good performance that we put on the board and move forward. And adjusted EBITDA, when looking at 2019 versus 2018, bear in mind that our guidance contemplates an approximately 10% of $40 million increase in investment in R&D and meaningful increases in selling and promotional expenses to support our recently launched and to be launched brands. If we were managing solely to deliver near-term growth of adjusted EBITDA, I have no doubt that we could put a higher EBITDA range on the board for 2019. But we're playing the longer game, and that means sacrificing a bit of near-term profits to deliver a better, more valuable future. I want to call your attention to some of the guidance details included on the slide. You see that we expect to increase CapEx in 2019. This is mainly growth CapEx for our initiative to introduce new daily silicone hydrogel lenses, but also to fund the overdue build out of our global IT infrastructure. We've also added a few new line items to our guidance slide, namely our expected gross profit margin, which we expect to be in the range of 71% to 72% in 2019 and our expected full year cash generated from operations, which we expect to be in the range of $1.5 billion to $1.6 billion. Note that our reported gross margin is sensitive to changes in FX rates, so please bear that in mind. Finally, we believe that on a constant-currency basis and for the midpoints of our 2019 guidance, we can grow over the next three years to 2022 at compound annual growth rates of between 4% to 6% for revenue and 5% to 8% for adjusted EBITDA. That's it for me, Joe.