Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the B&G Foods, Inc. Second Quarter 2012 Financial Results Conference Call. As a reminder, today's presentation is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to David Wenner, Chief Executive Officer of B&G Foods. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to the B&G Foods second quarter 2012 conference call. You can access detailed financial information on the quarter in our earnings release issued today, which is available on our website at bgfoods.com. Before we begin our formal remarks, I need to remind everyone that part of the discussion today includes forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and therefore, undue reliance should not be placed upon them. We refer all of you to our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and subsequent SEC filings for a more detailed discussion of the risks that could impact our future operating results and financial condition. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. We also will be making reference on today's call to the non-GAAP financial measure EBITDA. Reconciliations of this measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are provided in today's press release. We will start the call with our CFO, Bob Cantwell, discussing our financial results for the quarter. After Bob's remarks, I'll discuss the various factors that affected our results for the quarter, selected business highlights and our thoughts concerning the second half of the year. Bob?

Thank you, Dave. Net sales for the second quarter of 2012 increased $19.2 million or 14.8% to $148.6 million compared to $129.4 million for the second quarter of 2011. The Culver Specialty Brands, which we acquired at the end of November 2011, contributed $19.5 million of our net sales for the quarter. For our base business, a sales price increase of $4.3 million, offset by a $4.6 million unit volume decrease, resulted in a $0.3 million net sales decline. Net sales increased by $1.5 million for Ortega and $0.6 million for Cream of Wheat. These increases were offset by a reduction in net sales for B&G of $1.2 million, Las Palmas of $0.6 million and Underwood of $0.5 million. All other brands decreased $0.1 million in the aggregate. Gross profit increased $9.6 million for the second quarter of 2012 or 22.7% to $51.8 million from $42.2 million in the second quarter of 2011. Gross profit expressed as a percentage of net sales increased 220 basis points to 34.8% for the second quarter of 2012 from 32.6% for the second quarter of 2011. The increase in gross profit as a percentage of net sales was primarily due to pricing gains of $4.3 million and a sales mix shift to higher-margin products, primarily due to the Culver Specialty Brands acquisition, partially offset by commodity cost increase. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million or 3.1% to $14.6 million for the second quarter of 2012 compared to $14.2 million for the second quarter of 2011. This increase is primarily due to increases in brokerage expenses of $0.4 million, professional fees of $0.2 million and all other expenses of $0.3 million, offset by a decrease in consumer marketing and trade spending of $0.5 million. However, expressed as a percentage of net sales, our…

Thank you, Bob. Good afternoon again, everyone. The significant gains in our operating results that Bob just cited reflects several important accomplishments in the second quarter. First and foremost, the Culver Specialty Brands acquisition continued to perform as expected, accounting for all of the sales increase in the quarter and contributing significantly to our 30.6% EBITDA increase and our 27.2% increase in net income. Through 6 months, the acquisition has added $45.1 million in net sales, slightly ahead of our previously announced guidance of $88 million. Given that new products and new distribution will begin to kick in during the second half, we are hopeful that we will continue to improve on that number by year end. We are currently launching -- working on and launching new products in 5 of the 6 Culver Brands and should begin launching those products as the second half unfolds. The second accomplishment, the quarterly results reflect continued success with our price increases, announced last September and more modestly in February of this year. Price gains are tracking slightly ahead of our projections and contributed approximately 3.3% in net sales gains for the quarter and 2.6% for the first half. Pricing, combined with cost reduction and a favorable sales mix raised the margins in our base business adding to the margin improvement realized from the Culver acquisition. That sales mix comment leads me to the third important accomplishment implicit in our results. We continue to grow the most important brands in our portfolio. Tier I brands net sales increased by 2.8% for the second quarter, driven by Ortega growth at 4.7% and Cream of Wheat growth at 4.9%. Ortega has been a stellar brand for us, growing consistently, and this quarter was no exception. Most of its growth is coming from mass merchants due…

[Operator Instructions] And we'll go first to Sean Naughton with Piper Jaffray.

Dave, you mentioned something interesting in your remarks, where you were talking about the potential for a slowly firming consumer expectation in the back half of the year. Is this something that you're seeing at retail right now? Or is this just a belief that the economy is slowly getting better as employment is improving?

Well, it's an overall sentiment, but it is reflecting trends that we're seeing on a good number of our brands that they are slowly firming.

Okay. Is this -- do you feel like it's in -- like some of the Tier I, Tier II? Which kind of slate of brands do you feel like you're seeing some of the nice strength of that?

It's more in the Tier II and Tier III brands. The Tier I brands have been growing, 2 out of the 3 of them grew very nicely in the quarter, and pretty much in line with the kind of growth we've seen before. So it really is in that rest of the stable, if you will.

Got it. And then I guess, just lastly on the new product introductions you were discussing, can you talk a little bit more about the timing between Q3 and Q4, when you think that you could see some of those hit, and then any additional distribution opportunities you may be seeing with Culver with respect to any of the channels, whether it's wholesale -- the club business or the dollar store channel?

The trend is going to accelerate as the year goes on just because a number of these products aren't going to come to market until the fourth quarter. So we have some that are coming in the third quarter and some that are going to roll in, in the fourth quarter. And obviously, that will be a building trend as we go forward. The distribution gains on the base business are pretty much spread throughout the first, or rather the whole 6 months. And we have some of those in-house today, such as a very nice order from dollar stores on Culver products and on Cream of Wheat.

And from Barclays, we'll go next to Reza Vahabzadeh.

Any brands that sort of exceeded your expectations, just given the market environment or ones that maybe trailed your game plan going into the quarter? And any brands that you are maybe concerned with for whatever reason on a go-forward basis in the second half?

Well, to answer that in reverse, there's really no brands that we're concerned about. I think where we have any kind of issue in a brand, I think, we thoroughly understand why and are trying to address that. The 1 brand that just as a category problem that I don't know what can be done about it because consumers seem to be reacting badly to the price increases is the preserve category. And I noted in the Smucker call that they were saying their fruit spread business was down 11% as well. So we're pretty much in line, I guess. And it seems to be an overall problem with that category, where there were some pretty serious price increases, just because the cost of materials has skyrocketed and sweeteners and a good number of fruits. But I mean, I'm very pleased to see that 2 out of the 3 Tier I brands grow the way they did. Cream of Wheat coming back as it did was very, very encouraging. We struggled in the first quarter and we thought it was the warm weather. But this certainly validates that theory because it came back strong in the second quarter. But other than that, there's really not a lot of surprises. The variances we saw on most sales were very small percentage, plus or minus, and really don't speak to any issues in the portfolio.

Got it. And the Emeril portfolio and the Mexican dinner portfolio, how are you thinking about those?

Well, Mexican continues to do very well for us. I mean, Ortega has performed very, very well. Emeril, we continue to try and innovative in that category and push out new distribution to keep that brand in, if nothing more, a stable mode, and hopefully in a growth mode. We're launching 2 new pasta sauces, 2 alfredo sauces here as we speak. They've been very well-received at the retail levels and going into retailers like Kroger's, so we're very encouraged by that. So we're fighting a good fight in both of those areas.

Our next question comes from Robert Moskow with Credit Suisse. Robert Moskow - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: A question for you. You mentioned something interesting about supermarkets extending the timeframe for category reviews as much as 12 months. Why do you think they're doing that? Are they trying to delay price increases? I mean, it would seem that if category reviews get them new products, they'd be very eager to do more category reviews. And then secondly, with respect to pricing, you have corn prices going up, wheat prices going up. At what point are you going to have to think about higher prices for Ortega and Cream of Wheat, if any?

Well, the category reviews -- first off, Rob, the category reviews don't have anything to do with pricing. Retailers can change pricing without doing a category review and they do that all the time. This is more about changing the set within a section to weed out what's not selling and put in new products that hopefully will sell. And we've seen retailers not only extend it to 12 months, but extend it to well over 12 months. In the case of the 1 instance I was citing, it was over 2 years since that category had been reviewed. And that's why it took so long to get Cinnabon into that retailer. I think it's all about the expense of resetting categories. When you have an awful lot of stores it costs an awful lot per store, to strip the shelves down and reset them, and I think that expense is slowing people's inclination down to reset them. Robert Moskow - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: Got it. And the pricing on Cream of Wheat and Ortega?

As far as pricing goes, we're looking at 2013. And because we are aggressive in terms of extending our positions on these things, right now, our first blush at 2013 says we're going to see a modest overall price cost decrease and we're certainly going to see that cost decrease in wheat and corn. In the case of corn, when we saw the dip in corn, we have taken positions into the fourth quarter of next year on corn. And as I said earlier, on wheat, when you started seeing the futures dropping and everything, my inclination, I at least ask the question, "Should we shorten up our horizon on these and take advantage of these lower costs sooner?" We decided not to do that. And of course, the weather proved me correct immediately. Or I guess, the weather showed me the wisdom of that way immediately by things drying up and cost skyrocketing again. So we're pretty -- in pretty good shape for 2013, in terms of commodity costs right now.

Yes. it sounds like you're ahead of the curve in terms of planning farther out. And that's been the case for the last year or so.

[Operator Instructions] And we'll go next to Katya Voronchuk from Sidoti & Company. Katya Voronchuk - Sidoti & Company, LLC: I believe last quarter you mentioned that there was some reluctance among retailers with regard to implementing promotions. Have things improved since then? And also do you expect increased promotional activity in the second half of the year?

Well, the reluctance in terms of the promotions was the typical reaction we see when we raise the promotional price of items that where promotions really make a difference. And yes, there was some reluctance to do those promotions in the first half of the year. We don't foresee that disruption in the second half of the year. As is the usual case, it takes retailers a little while to get used to the fact that this is the new game. There is no other game because cost is what it is and this is what we can afford to do. And as other people in the category behave similarly, retailers get used to those new promotional prices and start executing on them. And that's what we expect in the second half of the year. Katya Voronchuk - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Okay. And you talked about supermarkets and dollar stores. Could you also give us an update on demand coming from the food service channel?

Well, food service was relatively flat for us in the quarter. Some parts grew. We exited some business intentionally, that was very low-margin business that drove a lot of working capital needs. And we did lose 1 account that changed the format of how they were buying things. So the positive and the negatives pretty much offset themselves for food services for us in the second quarter. Katya Voronchuk - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Okay. And looking at Canada, what percentage of your sales came from Canada for this quarter? And could you maybe give us some color on the progress you're making in penetrating that market?

Well, export in -- for us is about, in total, 3% of our sales. Most of it’s in Canada and we include Puerto Rico as export. And we do a little bit small business in a few other places. But pretty much, most of the -- it's about 3% in total, with about 2% of it being from Canada.

As far as progress goes, I guess, we were -- we got an education in Canada in terms of how long it takes to change things up there. One of the things that happens when you buy brands from other companies is you usually have to change the UPCs and the G10 numbers that are used with those brands. In the United States, you can execute that very, very quickly. It's usually the matter of a month or so. In Canada, it's taking a fully 6 months to execute that. It's just being done. It did cause some disruptions because the Canadian stance in a lot of cases was, "We're not going to order any new number until we sell out the old number." So that -- so even though Culver results were very, very good, they actually were impaired by about $0.5 million in the second quarter by that stance from the Canadians that once we sell out the old inventory, we'll bring in new inventory. So that's something we expect to snap back in the third quarter as we transition. The other thing that's happening in Canada is we're transitioning the existing business that we had from a distributor format to the traditional warehouse direct-to-customer format. That transition is going to happen in the very first part of August. And that will give us an effective increase in our selling price up there on the base business and should be over $1 million benefit for us in the second half here. So that's a very good positive that's going to kick in very soon. Katya Voronchuk - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Okay. And just last question. So overall, your volumes declined. How about no sodium and low sodium products within different categories? Did they perform in the same manner as all other products? Or did the sales volumes for those products bucked [ph] the trend?

Well, Mrs. Dash continues to perform very well for us. I assume you're partly referring to some lower sodium and no sodium products that we've launched. We've done that with Ortega, for instance, where we've reduced the sodium in our seasoning mixes. Those products are performing very well and selling at about half the rate of the regular products, which we consider very successful and also not cannibalizing our regular products. They're additive to our overall sales. So that's a trend we're going to continue to pursue. And we're looking at reducing sodium in a number of the offerings that we have out there across a number of brands. And it seems to resonate with consumers. So it definitely is something we're going to follow up.

And from Federated Investors, we'll go next to Thomas Scherr.

So just looking at the non-Culver business, all-in, would EBITDA have been up or down?

EBITDA would have been up.

Been up a little bit. Yes.

And at this time, there are no further questions in the queue. Mr. Wenner, I'll turn the call back to you, sir.

Okay. Thank you, operator. Again, thank you very much for joining us on the call. Despite the volume challenges that we’ve had, we really think that we have achieved the very important parts of our goals for the second quarter, which include successfully executing on Culver, since that's a very important part of the increases we're having this year, selling the products that we consider the most important products to sell and growing those sales, and also increasing margins in the base business, despite the drag that we did have on the volume side. All of those things speak to an even better result in the second half as we recover volume. And we're looking forward to performing on that and continuing to give our shareholders a very good return. So thank you very much.

And ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude today's presentation. We thank you for your participation.