Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by. Welcome to the First Quarter Fiscal 2007 Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Following the presentation, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. Instructions will be provided at that time for you to queue up for questions. If anyone has any difficulties hearing the conference, please press star, zero for operator assistance at any time. I would like to remind everyone that this conference call is being recorded on Thursday, June 29, 2006, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern. I will now turn the conference over to Mr. Dennis Kavelman, CFO. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, and welcome to RIM’s fiscal 2007 first quarter results conference call. With me is Jim Balsillie, RIM’s Chairman and co-CEO. After reading the required forward-looking statements disclaimer, I will begin by providing an overview of first quarter results as well as our guidance for Q2. I will then turn the call over to Jim who will provide a business and strategic update. We will then open up the call for questions. I would like to note that this call is available to the general public by a call-in number and webcast. Replay of the webcast will be available on the rim.com website. We plan to wrap up the call at 6:00 p.m. Eastern this evening. Some of the statements Jim and I will be making today constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and applicable Canadian securities laws. These include statements about our expectations and estimates with respect to revenue, gross margin, operating expenses, stock option expense, Cap-Ex, depreciation amortization, investment income, earnings, earnings per share, and ASP’s for Q2 and beyond, our expectations regarding RIM’s near- and long-term tax rates, our estimates of the number of BlackBerry subscriber accounts, subscriber account additions and other non-financial estimates, our product development initiatives, developments relating to our carrier partners, new and expanding markets for our products, and other statements regarding our plans and objectives. We will indicate forward-looking statements by using words such as “expect”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, "may", "will", "should", "forecast", "intend", "believe", and similar expressions. All forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties in assumptions we’ve made. Many factors could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by our…

Thanks very much, Dennis. We are pleased that RIM’s fiscal 2007 got off to such a great start. Subscriber account growth was strong in both North America and the rest of the world, and revenue and earnings were slightly higher than the levels we forecasted back in April. We are seeing momentum return in our carrier channels, and enterprise customers are continuing to expand existing deployments and seek ways to extend the benefits of BlackBerry to many new areas of their businesses. BlackBerry’s market leadership in the enterprise is translating into strong progress in the retail market. With almost 25% of our subscriber base using BIS, we believe that we are nearing the critical mass required to really grow our presence in the retail channel. We have a number of initiatives underway to leverage our position. We will be finalizing these plans this summer in preparation for fall launches, and we look forward to sharing more details with you in the near future. During Q2, we launched a number of new devices around the world, and the success of the 8700 series of device is continuing. We are pleased this quarter that T-Mobile became the second carrier to launch the 8700 in the U.S., and we saw a meaningful contribution to our subscriber base from this launch. T-Mobile is supporting its BlackBerry portfolio of products with an aggressive marketing and advertising campaign this summer. This past quarter, RIM hosted the fifth Wireless Enterprise Symposium in Orlando. Attendance was exceptional, with 3,000 attendees participating in the three-day event. Sessions were held in three tracks, with over 100 partners showcasing leading edge wireless solutions. I will now provide you with a business and strategic update. We continue to add new carrier partners at a rapid rate, with 29 added this quarter alone,…

Could the Operator come on to handle questions, please?

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now conduct the question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions) Your first question comes from Andrew Lee from TD Newcrest. Please go ahead with your question.

Jim, if you could comment on the state of growth year over year of the wireless e-mail market, primarily on the corporate side. If you look at the 680 you guys just delivered in this quarter and take the top end of the next quarter, you’re looking at around 13% to 15% year over year growth on net subscriber additions. I’m wondering if that’s the rate of growth of the whole market on the corporate side that you’re seeing, or there’s something specific happening with RIM’s subscriber base?

Well, we’re pretty aware of what other solutions are out there and what they’re adding, and in spite of what is posturing, you know, we’re still the over-overwhelming market share leader and very, very high market shares, so much of our sales is really a proxy for the market. There’s no question the market continues to grow. There’s no question that there’s a resurgence setting up after all the IPR overhang and hype that was going on in the market in the last 6 to 9 months. All the misinformation and hype and that kind of stuff tends to do is slow down an overall market growth, so we’re definitely pleased with the growth surging back. We definitely think it’s set to surge very strong, though of course we have to guide flatly. I think it’s very fair to consider it a proxy of growth for the market. Will the growth accelerate? We hope so. We expect it, but you never know until you know, but it’s definitely a market with a tremendous amount of growth going on, but we’re not seeing any end of the growth opportunities -- anything but. We’re not seeing anyone sort of taking some kind of share of what we’ve traditionally had. Those kinds of activities haven’t manifested themselves in the market yet.

Your next question comes from Maynard Um from UBS Securities. Please go ahead with your question.

My question is on hardware pricing, looking out longer term. How should we look at the hardware pricing, particularly in the consumer segment, given some of your competitor pricing, in particular for consumers? Do you think your end-to-end solution differentiation will allow you to maintain your ASP’s and your margins at the current levels? Thank you.

Well, I mean, we’re actually ASP leaders in the high-performance converged devices, so in terms of -- when I mean leaders, I mean in terms of price competitiveness. You have to be very careful in mixing the commodity, low-end phones with the more conversed appliances, so when it comes to functionality and performance, I think we’re at the top of the class. When it comes to price and the value, I think we really lead the charge on that. I think really what is happening in this industry is there’s so much innovation going on in the converged appliance space is that there’s obviously always kind of a price, ASP erosion on standard products, but there’s so much innovation going on in the devices in so many different dimensions that the innovation more than compensates for the sort of price erosion of sort of a standard product. We’re just seeing a very, very dynamic space right now. I don’t think you’re going to see any radical shifts in ASP’s, and I think we’re incredibly well-positioned competitively, not only on price but also on functionality.

$299 right now on our retail targeted product is price leadership, and that’s priced into the carrier, because then they subsidize it down, and Jim talked about I think Sprint at $199 and others down in that price range. The other key is that we’re working to drive costs down even faster than any potential ASP movement, so I think you’re seeing that reflected in us maintaining our margins and raising margin expectations for next quarter. On a long, long-term basis, I think there’s going to be stratified products for us. As I said at the analyst day, you know, there’s certainly going to be retail-targeted products. You could see different ASP’s, but our overall blended ASP has been holding in nicely.

Your next question comes from Rob Sanderson from American Technology Research. Please go ahead with your question.

Thanks, good afternoon. Congratulations on solid execution, guys. Maybe a quick housekeeping, then a real question on the housekeeping side. Dennis, could you give us any color on the breakdown of stock comp across the various expense lines? Then, a broader question, how do you really galvanize consumer adoption and really move beyond e-mail here? I think we’re seeing the beginning of what’s possible with the new processors, new networks, etc., but how do you take that to the next level? Do you expect that to be an iterative process, or do you see breakthroughs on the horizon?

Why don’t I do housekeeping first, and Jim can think about his response to your question. I’m not going to give you the exact breakout. The majority is split along with our employee base between R&D and sales and marketing. There’s a relatively small component in cost of sales, so I think it’s fairly even between SG&A and R&D.

Rob, repeat the second piece?

I was just asking about how to really drive consumer adoption and move application beyond e-mail, and whether you think that that’s an iterative process or whether you see breakthroughs on the horizon.

I think there’s a tremendous set of stuff going on right now. We have over 1,000 lifestyle apps on the BES right now. It’s happening. We’re seeing just a tremendous amount. With the public MDS and all the web services that’s going to drive, the network’s are going to be a platform for application, so we’re seeing a tremendous amount of stuff, not only on the portal and ISP and the Google-type maps, the MSN, the Microsoft Live, the Yahoo! Go, the e-bay’s, the Amazon, but all kinds of more niche type things, the more entertainment and more information -- when you start adding in media players and storage capabilities and image capture type things, I think without a doubt these things are happening and they’re iterative, but they’re happening in a positive, iterative way that’s up into the right. We’re enormously excited. The other thing to keep in mind is that users, even if you’re corporate, you also have a non-corporate life -- I hope -- and so this idea of this kind of a life window for things beyond enterprise rings very, very true. With the root key type capability and the fact that with prepaid plans, people refresh their cards. Well, that’s a form of micropayments. It’s the same architecture to prepay a phone for $5 as it is to buy anything else. There’s no question it’s iterative and evolutionary, but it’s absolutely happening right now. It is well beyond e-mail -- gaming, ticket purchasing, merchandising, information, IM, personalization -- and it’s going to lead to stuff beyond that. It’s just as exciting as the enterprise base. It’s happening, and it’s growing very, very fast. In a couple of years, it’s gone from sort of nothing to a quarter of our user base, and it’s accelerating. There’s all kind of retail channel programs, and we definitely have products evolving to more suit that segment. Yes, I think that’s an area where a smart person would pay attention and possibly be somewhat optimistic.

Your next question comes from Jeffery Kvaal from Lehman Brothers. Please go ahead with your question.

Thanks very much for taking the question. Just to dive into this a little bit more, could we circle back to the impact of the Q that you may have seen in your business? Certainly there’s been a lot of talk about that gaining some traction in the prosumer market. I’m wondering if that has shown up for you at all. Also, has it led Verizon to come back to you and say “hey, let’s talk about pricing” in any way? Thank you.

Well, the Q, it’s not an inexpensive unit and you get the price that you get from it if you sign up for a two-year contract, so when it comes to price competitiveness, we’re fine on that. As you mentioned, Motorola gave an exclusive to Verizon and a CDMA product there. I think the reviews that you read out there, they kind of accurately characterize what we’ve seen in the market. Just read the performance reviews and all that and seek out the scuttlebutt from those at Verizon, and I think they’ll give you a very fair characterization of what’s going on. It was targeted, even though it was call sort of the “BlackBerry Killer” and this and that, which I don’t know who came up with it or whatever -- its impact wouldn’t even qualify as noticeable.

Even in the BES section of your crew?

I guess I would say -- the way I would characterize it, its impact, I wouldn’t even put it in the category of noticeable.

Okay, all right, Jim, thanks very much.

Your next question comes from Gus Papageorgiou from Scotia Capital. Please go ahead with your question.

Dennis, a question for you. You guys are talking about launching new hardware targeted more to the prosumer than perhaps the retail, and you mentioned that you’ll probably going to look for increased SG&A spending in the fall, I guess to support these product launches and marketing efforts. I’m just wondering, do you think you’re going to have to kind of spend ahead of the product launches to stimulate demand, so we’ll probably see an increase in expenses before we hit the revenue? Or do you think they’re be in tandem? I’m just kind of wondering, as we look to the second half, is there a chance that this increased SG&A spending is going to hurt the operating margins?

Well, Gus, I think it comes together. If I was forecasting a big ad spend in the summer, then I would say yes, that was ahead of when we're expecting growth, but we’ve been pretty consistent in the second half of the year, meaning Q3, Q4. There’s no question that’s a period where we do every year spend more on branding and advertising. This year in particular, with some focused launches, particularly at the global scope of what we do now, I think and I’ve said before that we’re going to be investing there. At the same time, as you said, it will be in tandem or in conjunction with these products shipping and flowing through to carriers and end users, so hopefully the two go together.

Just a quick follow-up then. For the most part, you really depend on the carriers as your channels to the market, and a lot of the advertising that we’ve seen have been largely through the carriers. Do you think you’re going to break that model and do more direct advertising on BlackBerry on your own?

I think that’s a fair question, and my answer would be I think we’re going to advertise in tandem. Every now and then we really surge our brand positioning and all that stuff. We keep doing things in partnership with carriers for sure, but probably doing some complementary activities beyond that for a certain phase in the back-end of ’07 is probably a smart thing to do.

Great, thanks a lot.

Your next question comes from Mike Abramsky from RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead with your question.

Thanks very much. The service pricing trends, it was sort of -- maybe a similar question to what was asked earlier on hardware. Your subscribers were a little bit above what we were expecting, certainly, but your service revenues are a bit softer. I’m just wondering what trends you might see on service pricing out there and maybe in the back half of the year as you move with your new launches?

Mike, it’s Dennis. I’ll start, then Jim can jump in, if he wishes. We talked about the mix of BIS users being 25%, and certainly there’s a pricing difference between BIS and BES, as I think everybody is familiar. We’ve also said that as volumes really ramp, you see gradual decreases in ARPU charged to the large carriers, etc. So I would say that the blended ARPU is in the range that we had expected. Service revenue look a little funny, being flat Q4 to Q1 because Q4 was 14 weeks, and therefore we had an extra week in Q4, and Q1 was more normalized. We’re not seeing any radical decreases in pricing, as we said at the analyst day. It’s holding in very, very nicely. We had the one new part to the model where TIM is charging on a pay-as-you-go basis, but it’s working out to roughly the same amounts on BIS, so that’s not really impacting it. Jim, I don’t know if you have thoughts on what they should think about going forward.

Some of the pricing you know has got a bit of a downward trend when you -- the mobile text units shift over to GPRS or CDMA, so in those cases, we’re reselling air time, so that’s really just a pass through that’s moved away. I think there’s a lot of ways you value add it. I don’t think you’ll see anything dramatic for a while.

Thanks very much.

Your next question comes from Paul Coster with JP Morgan. Please go ahead with your question.

Yes, I would just like to address the future state, if I may, as we think about your consumer products. Are you going to differentiate the branded experience in some way, whether the BlackBerry or the device? With Ascendant, when we will see the business model coming to market? What do you think it’s going to look like? Is it going to be a subscription service, for instance?

The branding of the consumer thing is a very, very fair question and one that I really can’t answer in too great a detail right now, but definitely I think there needs to be a brand positioning that’s complementary to the enterprise BlackBerry, but distinct. I think that’s a fair thing and that’s a fair activity point and it’s a fair exercise, so that it’s clear, the separation but it’s also clear the commonality. That’s something that’s very, very active in a near-term aspect of what we’re doing right now for fairly imminent plans in this area. For Ascendant, you can really just think that it’s going to evolve to an integrated BES experience. Really, and this is something that we’ve kind of -- there’s kind of two ways to think of wireless middleware. You can think of it as an application, forward integration, or what someone would call a stack leverage strategy, and there’s certain companies that are doing that. Or you could think of it as a middleware that’s generic for a plurality of applications, and that’s sort of an unaligned middleware strategy. Clearly, we’re in the latter camp. When you think of the four categories of information that interface to: one is desktop, which is IMAP or MAPI; two is the IM interfaces for corporate real-time computing; third is the web services, or services-oriented architecture interfaces, the XML HTTP through MDS; and the fourth category is voice PBX interfaces, whether it’s Legacy TDM or more sort of VOIP-oriented zip interfaces. It would be a deviation from our model to really just charge more in a CAL for additional functionality. Our view of it is that would be like charging more for a management console, or more for a security function, or more for an attachment view or whatever. Our model is really you get a CAL, you get everything and we’re going to work real hard to preserve that. Now, because we just bought Ascendant, even though they’re very active in marketing, very successful -- and let me tell you, IT directors and line of business people, their jaw drops over this. It’s like the “wow” thing that they never thought of. It’s an absolute jaw-dropper. We just have to catch it in sort of a bundle basis in the next product rev. That’s all it is. You can expect it to be an integrated part of the solution offer.

So you see it driving forward revenue in the existing manner -- through devices, through software, and through ARPU’s? It doesn’t sound like it’s an incremental business, then.

No, because what happens is -- I mean, it’s always a decision, but we really go for a very simple model because we’re trying to put a zero on -- we’re trying to build an adoption profile. This is anything but a mature market, and so everything about our stuff is driving adoption. So if you start putting complexity and feature and component pricing and all that stuff, it’s a much more complex sale process and there’s parasitic drag on adoption. That’s fine for a well-adopted market, but for an emerging market, we’ve made a strategic decision that that’s not the approach that ensure we get the most out of the opportunity.

Okay, got it. Thanks.

Your next question comes from Peter Misek from Canaccord Capital. Please go ahead with your question.

Good afternoon, gentlemen. Just a follow-up question to that. Our discussions with carriers sort of center around the fact that you’re so much more than mobile e-mail now, and when they look at some of these IMS architectures and they look at certainly what you’re offering, it seems that you’re capability to be that application platform and leverage in the consumer market is greater than ever. Can you help us understand that? I know you said you’re going to keep the model simple and not introduce complexity, but certainly the carrier’s desire to be much more than a silly pipe is growing. It certainly seems like you have this ability. Can you help us understand that? That would be great.

The most vexing issue for carriers that I’ve come across globally is how to go up the value chain. They’re very experienced in voice versus voice competitions, which is a lot of rate plan and branding and service coverage-type stuff -- very traditional. When you go to the value chain, you’re really contending in the ecosystem. Much of the competitive frameworks involves independent hardware vendors, independent software vendors, portals, ISP’s, PTT’s, and others in the value chain. It’s very, very vexing for the carriers in this place, and I sort of spend a fair bit of time talking to them. If you sort of assumed a normal distribution, three standard deviations out in the tail I view is the sort of walled-garden approach, which is a high control strategy, but it suffocates user experience and thus the adoption is very weak. That’s proven out in WAP and MMS because those are walled-garden architectures. Then, you go to the other extreme of three standard deviations out on the other tail, and that’s the broadband pipe strategy. You know, we’re just a PC card and we’re just a pipe. Strategically, it takes the carrier out of the value equation with a broadband pipe. We’re just a disintermediated bit-pipe. I think right in the middle of that great big, juicy value-added platform play for the carrier, where they’re the natural incumbent to do it. They build, provision and brand and care for this window. Last time I checked, not a single person I know of in the world has ever said I don’t want a mobile phone anymore. So this is a constant in life, assured going forward and it’s natural to overlay a data platform into the window. So the question is, other than those two strategies of going out several standard…

Thank you, Jim.

Your next question comes from Richard Windsor from Nomura International. Please go ahead with your question.

Hi, good evening. I was wondering if you could give us an idea of your expectations for BlackBerry Connect over the next couple of years or so. What percentage of your adds would you expect, or your subscribers do you expect to go on the BlackBerry Connect with a non-BlackBerry device? Perhaps in the U.S.A. and outside the U.S.A.? Thank you very much.

I would say it’s growing very well. We expect it to continue to grow. We have over 20 devices -- I’ve been saying 20 launched on BlackBerry Connect but I’ve just been corrected; it’s 23. I know we have another 20 in backlog to launch this year. We think it’s going to grow very substantial. In key BlackBerry Connect launches, say in the United States that you’ve seen recently, over half of the high-end phones sold have been activated on BlackBerry Connect. So yes, again, to the extent that you want to be a platform that allows the carrier to grab that sweet spot in the middle, you must allow them to leverage all aspects of device diversity and device innovation and device marketing that’s out there. I see it becoming an increasingly important and increasingly relevant thing we do, and I’m unbelievably excited and fully supportive of it. I think we’re starting to see the traction. I also think that some of these device vendors realize that doing this data, high-performance data environment is rather challenging, and so you have to have a very hardened product, and you have to think through persistence and battery life and application features and reliability and care, and we provide a lot of that, but it’s a different set of dimensional imperatives than the voice market, the voice SMS market. There’s a bit of a learning curve for a lot of these players, but we support them as much as we can. We integrate it fully in our key support. We fully integrate in all of our tier 3 and 4 customer care. We do a lot of joint marketing, but I think you’re going to see some real winners and losers out there, and the one that addresses all the issues that somebody’s looking for will do quantum bases better -- it won’t be incremental than those that hang out a couple fundamental flaws. So that’s why you have to watch the hype. It’s not about another pretty face and device design, though certainly appearance matters. You have to have a very thorough platform underneath. I have to be careful in talking about how many units different partners are selling, but we have very good visibility on which of them are doing well and which of them are doing so-so. I would say certainly, just as a bit of a hint, the Nokia stuff is doing particularly well. We’re seeing some real strong interest in the Sony Ericsson, but then again you’re seeing some of the Palm and some of the Microsoft stuff also do well. It’s for the customers and for the carriers to decide.

So you don’t see it detrimental to your own device business? You think it makes the whole market bigger? Would that be the right…

Not within a heartbeat. If you were to metaphor it for what it does for our business, it’s five steps forward in terms of platform enabling, one step back for device competition. You have to understand that if you platform enable in a very positive way, you turbo-charge the opening up of the addressable market. At the end of the day, someone could play market share percentage games, but also when you drive the TAM, there’s a whole lot to be said about TAM driving too. As the overwhelming market leader in this, we have to really play a thoughtful role here.

Great, thank you.

Operator, it’s five to, so I think we’ll take our last question.

Your final question comes from Tim Long from Banc of America. Please go ahead with your question.

Thank you. If I could just make it a clarification and a question. Dennis, on the device side guidance for next quarter, I’m pretty sure you said gross margins would be flat to up, based on positive mix, but ASP’s would be down on mix. Could you just clarify that’s correct and how that is? The question would be you also talked about a stronger order book than normal into the quarter. Could you give us a little more color on that, what type of products? Is this just driven by the greater than 55,000 per week on the net add front, or is it more broad than that and spanning across upgrades, etc.?

Sure, I’ll take the order book one first. You go through periods where you have P.O.’s in hand versus just plain old forecast, and what we’re seeing and what we’ve been working very hard to do is work closely with our carrier partners so they understand and we understand exact sell-through rates -- not just based on new sub-adds, but on what’s happening for upgrades, etc. We fine-tuned that to the point where we’re getting much better clarity and much quicker P.O.’s from them. My point was simply that I think -- sorry, the last fact was that channel inventory is at a very reasonable level. I mean, the times when you would see orders not in hand and you have to go out and work for the P.O.’s would be if channel inventory was high and people were trying to work it down, and we’re not in that scenario right now. We feel the channel inventory is at a very good level. I think that they’re seeing the upgrade cycle continue strong. I think a number of carriers are seeing good subscriber growth, and we’re working closely with them so the net net is we’ve got a lot of P.O.’s in hand and a high percentage of the order book, which is nice to have. What I meant on the margin side was just because a product may have lower ASP, it could also have higher gross margin. It depends on the technology that we’re selling in terms of GSM-based or CDMA-based or IM-based, etc. It depends on the generation of the product, so it’s not quite as simple as higher ASP means higher margins. The product families have slightly different margins, and that can be because of royalties and licenses and all kinds of different things that are tied in. So you can’t tie them exactly together, but yes, we do expect gross margin to be up slightly in Q2.

There’s no specific product or product set that spans across those two points that’s really leading your device shipments in one direction or another? I assume it’s more new products skewed in the stronger order book?

You’re talking about order book now?

Yes, but I’m assuming that leads into your guidance on devices, because I’m assuming the order book is driving it.

Yes. It’s ironic. There are a lot of products that have been in the market for a little while that we continue to sell through very, very well in big markets and in new, some of the emerging markets, and yes, of course, the new products, people are very excited about and they’re broadly available around the world. We have a lot of -- you see all the press releases on the launches of 8700’s around the world and 7130’s and 8707’s.

Thank you.

I think that’s a wrap. It’s six o’clock. I’d like to remind everyone that there’s a post view service available and you can listen to the call on the rim.com website. Thanks very much.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the conference call for today. Thank you for participating. Please disconnect your line.