Earnings Labs

Bandwidth Inc. (BAND)

Q3 2018 Earnings Call· Tue, Oct 30, 2018

$24.09

-0.15%

Key Takeaways · AI generated
AI summary not yet generated for this transcript. Generation in progress for older transcripts; check back soon, or browse the full transcript below.

Same-Day

+7.65%

1 Week

-0.91%

1 Month

-5.87%

vs S&P

-8.81%

Transcript

Operator

Operator

Greetings, and welcome to the Bandwidth Third Quarter 2018 Earnings Results Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Marc Griffin. Please go ahead.

Marc Griffin

Analyst

Thank you, good afternoon, and welcome to Bandwidth's third quarter 2018 earnings call. Today, we'll be discussing the results announced in our press release issued after the market close. With me on the call this afternoon is David Morken, Bandwidth's, Chief Executive Officer; and Jeff Hoffman, Chief Financial Officer of Bandwidth. They will begin with prepared remarks and then we will then open the call up for Q&A. During the call, we will make statements related to our business that may be considered forward-looking, including statements concerning our financial guidance for the fourth fiscal quarter of 2018 and the full year of 2018, our plan is to execute on growth strategy, our ability to maintain existing and acquire new customers and other statements regarding our plans and prospects. Forward-looking statements may often be identified with words, such as, we expect, we anticipate or upcoming. These statements reflect our views only as of today and should not be considered our views as of any subsequent date. We undertake no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not promises or guarantees of future performance and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ materially from our expectations. For a discussion of material risks and other important factors that could affect our actual results, please refer to those contained in our 10-K filing on February 26, 2018, as updated by other SEC filings all of which are available on the Investor Relations section of our website at bandwidth.com, and on the SEC's website at SEC.gov. Finally, during the course of today's call, we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures is included in our press release issued after the close of market today, which is located at our website at bandwidth.com and on the SEC's website at sec.gov. With that, let me turn the call over to David.

David Morken

Analyst

Thank you, Marc, and thanks to everyone for joining us on the call today. During the third quarter, we again exceeded expectations on all guiding metrics. Our CPaaS revenue increased 24% year-over-year driving total revenue of $50.5 million. We continue to successfully serve and grow our existing customers as demonstrated by our 117% dollar-based net retention rate. Our CPaaS software platform and IP voice network continue to attract new active CPaaS customers with our CPaaS customer base growing 26% year-over-year. We are very pleased with our third quarter execution, which has yielded broad based strength across all our service offerings, which are provided to a diverse set of enterprise customers. We deliver comprehensive solutions through our vertically integrated platform that addresses that unique and complex needs of the inventive enterprises we serve. As a result, these enterprises have continued to innovate and grow with our platform over many years. And it is common for our customers to use our platform, not just for a single customer use case, but for many; a long tenured customer such as Google or Microsoft will have numerous customer experiences powered by Bandwidth. During this last quarter, for example, Google added voice capabilities within their G Suite services using our flexible software APIs and nationwide IP voice network to enable voice calling for G Suite meetings. Our software platform makes it easy for creative enterprise teams to build, deploy and scale enterprise communication with superior quality, reliability and accountability. We also continued to see demand for our services from new customers as well during the quarter. We entered into a new relationship with a leading provider of cloud-based call center applications, which services various Fortune 500 companies. As cloud providers continue to penetrate the contact center market, they seek a partner in Bandwidth to provide…

Jeff Hoffman

Analyst

Thanks, David, and good afternoon everyone. On the call today, I will provide a more detailed overview of our third quarter financial performance and then provide our outlook for the fourth quarter and full year 2018. Following my remarks, we will open the call to your questions. Third quarter was another strong performance for Bandwidth highlighted by better than expected results across all guided metrics. Our financial results demonstrate a robust business model as enterprises continue to embed voice messaging and 911 into their products and services. Our growth in 2018 continues to be primarily driven by expanding our relationships with existing customers and we continue to see strength from customers in all verticals across many offerings. Additionally, our results were bolstered by the addition of new CPaaS customers. During the third quarter, our total revenue was $50.5 million, up 22% year-over-year and $2.3 million above the high end of our guidance range. Within total revenue, CPaaS revenue was $41.5 million, up 24% year-over-year and $1 million above the high end of our guidance range. Other revenue contributed to the remaining $8.9 million of total revenue and was more than the $7.9 million from the third quarter of 2017 due to higher than anticipated indirect revenue. We ended the third quarter with 1,155 active CPaaS customer accounts, up 26% year-over-year. In addition, our dollar-based net retention rate was 117%, compared to 105% during the third quarter of 2017. Before moving onto profitability metrics, I would like to point out that I will be discussing non-GAAP results going forward. Our GAAP financial results along with the full reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP results can be found in our earnings release. Our non-GAAP gross profit, which excludes stock-based compensation and depreciation, was $24.1 million, using a gross margin of 48% for the…

Operator

Operator

At this time, we'll be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Brent Bracelin from KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.

Clarke Jeffries

Analyst

Hi, it’s Clarke Jeffries on for Brent. David, just a question on that cloud-based call center partnership that you mentioned, is that a first for you in terms of relationship with a software vendor outside of the unified communications space? And is this the first time they're sourcing from a CPaaS partner? Is this then moving to dual sourcing and they already had a CPaaS relationship previously?

David Morken

Analyst

Clarke it is not the first customer that we have had that serves the enterprise contact center space, to answer part one of your question. They did displace an incumbent in selecting bandwidth. And as is commonly the experience in the enterprise space multisource across the various providers.

Clarke Jeffries

Analyst

Alright, great. And then a question for Jeff. I think we continue to see upside of profitability. Could you maybe frame the investments for the fourth quarter? You mentioned G&A expenses in terms of rev rec and other ongoing expenses in the second half of this year. Are we going to see that more into Q4 as G&A maybe a little bit higher?

Jeff Hoffman

Analyst

Yes Clark, I'm glad to respond to that. So when we look at our operating expenses, and I'll just go from top to bottom, we're going to start with research and development. We're continuing to add to our team there, particularly software developers, engineers and the like. And this is what's driving sort of our roadmap and how we can not only serve our current customers with better future customers, you’ll be able to see that continue to grow. You will also see us as we deliver on the plan that we've outlined all year on sales headcount and what we're going to continue to hire there. And so you should expect to see continued growth in sales and marketing expenses in fourth quarter. And then finally, what you were ringing on was G&A. That will also have some growth with it too. We talked about this on last quarter's call, as well as there's a little bit of lumpiness. There are some projects that we're doing in the second half of the year, more acutely in fourth quarter, like ASC606, some other security and other routine things that we do that we should be doing as a business that serves enterprise customers. And that’s how we see the fourth quarter shaping up.

Clarke Jeffries

Analyst

Alright, great. Thanks very much.

Operator

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Pat Walravens from JMP Securities. Please proceed with your question.

Pat Walravens

Analyst · your question.

Oh, great. Thanks very much. I guess my first question and I think your strong results probably answer it. But I just want to specifically ask it anyways. Did you see any signs of hesitation out there in spending because of sort of macro concerns?

David Morken

Analyst · your question.

Pat, this is David. Just reflecting for a moment, there wasn't a particular enterprise engagement that extended the decision timeframe or withdrew from the market that I've got top of mind. So well certainly macro environmental variables see more volatile. I don't have testimony that could corroborate that individually with an engagement.

Pat Walravens

Analyst · your question.

Okay, thanks. And then David, I guess I would love to hear the more perspective on international. First of all, I mean, how important is it to you, you talk about it on every call. Is it – in sort of your set of priorities, where does it fit?

David Morken

Analyst · your question.

It fits as extraordinary upside and strategically important because it's so valuable to our large enterprise customers, many of them who spend more outside the United States on communication services with existing partners in various countries than they do in the U.S. And so we are following demand and doing so leveraging the many years long existing enterprise relationships that we have to hopefully, if we do it right, source, anchor tenant partners with whom we innovate well with and have in the U.S. and then deploy with them around the world. So instead of build it and they will come, it's important to us because our customers importantly have told us please serve us in other jurisdictions.

Pat Walravens

Analyst · your question.

Okay. And then my follow up on that is what's the hardest part?

David Morken

Analyst · your question.

The hardest part for me is to make sure that Jeff and I do this in a fashion that is consistent with the value that we've built in the United States in terms of being both CapEx light and having an integrated platform and network strategy that we can promise and keep a promise on quality to these enterprise customers and that means navigating different regulatory environments and making sure we're building that which our customers value. And sometimes you can be tempted to settle and couple together aspects of an IP network and platform just in the name of doing something faster and we don't think that that's the right approach. We want to do it right and we've learned an enormous amount with the help of some great additions to the team and as I mentioned in my comments, getting close to starting to execute.

Pat Walravens

Analyst · your question.

Right, great. And then Jeff, a quick one for you, so on the dollar based net retention rate, I mean 117% is great, but it went up the last three quarters or everything, 105%, 111%, 115%, 119% if my chart is right and so now it's back down a little bit. How should we think about what it does in the future?

Jeff Hoffman

Analyst · your question.

Great, Pat. So your numbers are right. And this is something that's really common in a usage based revenue business such as ours. You'll see fluctuations in this metric as well as usage and there's a lot of things that can kind of go into that. So I wouldn't read too much into a quarter. We the management team don't get to up or down based on one quarter. What we do look at is annual comparisons that we do. And so the 117% that we posted this quarter is 12% better than the 105% that we posted a year ago. And we do look at that because that will sort of smooth out any waviness that would be in there.

Pat Walravens

Analyst · your question.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Operator

Operator

Our next question comes from line of Meta Marshall from Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question.

Meta Marshall

Analyst · your question.

Great, thanks. Just kind of diving into the net retention a little bit, if you could just talk about is it purely just increased usage of the same products they were using or kind of any trends as far as large customers or smaller customers kind of influencing that one way or another or kind of deeper product usage that contributed anything to that metric? And then maybe second, I know you guys have been kind of investing in some areas that would improve gross margins, gross margins continue to be, but your guide would kind of imply maybe a step down in gross margins, if I'm thinking about it right. So just trying to understand how we should be thinking about gross margins and the pacing of some of R&D that you guys are doing? Thanks.

David Morken

Analyst · your question.

Thanks, Meta. This is David. I'll take the first part of your question and then turn it over to Jeff for your question about gross margin. In regard to the net retention rate and what it sources are, it is broad across our enterprise customer set and diverse in terms of utilization of the services we offer. So we are seeing growth across the board on the platform for voice and messaging and emergency service. In some cases, larger enterprise are consuming new services for them for the first time, but there isn't a single driver in a particular customer that is causing the net retention rate to be at the level that it's at.

A - Jeff Hoffman

Analyst · your question.

And then I'll pick up on the gross margin and investment question. So, I think your interpretation of the fourth quarter margin based on the annual guidance overall 48%, you're right. It is down a little bit. It's primarily in our other segment. We had more indirect revenue in third quarter, which made that margin even better in the third quarter of 2018. We won't see that reoccur in fourth quarter. And so that that's the primary driver. I would say CPaaS margins beneath the word of total remain buoyant, but at the same point we are continuing to make investments. We did that right out of the blocks once we had the IPO proceeds in our possession and we continue to do that each quarter. And some of those have bared fruit and our yielding margin expansion at the same point we're still putting capital to work and so there's a downward pressure offsetting that with the net of that as we have generally sort of flat margins for the year as we’ve guided.

Meta Marshall

Analyst · your question.

Got it. And then maybe just kind of jumping on, I know you gave a couple of customer examples, but of the 60 or so new customers this quarter, how is the composition maybe changing of those 60 customers versus maybe the 60 customers you saw kind of at the beginning of the year that maybe would have been leads you had already started to harvest pre-IPO.

David Morken

Analyst · your question.

The composition of the customers on boarded in the third quarter is relatively consistent with prior periods largely because the lead sources from which we derive these customers remain constant throughout that period. We haven't gone fishing in new ponds. We have increased the sales capacity on the desk, which the yield from which will be out into the future, but right now we are really focusing on a curated database of about 50,000 medium-sized business customers and then for our strategic hunters, the Fortune 1000. And so no significant difference Meta in terms of the composition or expectation on how those customers will be productive for us in the years to come.

Meta Marshall

Analyst · your question.

Got it. Thanks guys. Nice quarter.

Operator

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Richard Davis from Canaccord. Please proceed with your question.

Richard Davis

Analyst · your question.

Thanks. It could be kind of brief. But so guys have a strong foundation in kind of voice CPaaS and a good presence in SMS. One of the areas that we've seen, I don't know to what extent that will be big, but is video CPaaS, what do you think of that area? What your plans there and what's your thoughts there? Thanks.

David Morken

Analyst · your question.

Thanks, Richard. We have historically not considered video to be a usage based opportunity that's attractive to our platform and network strategy. We do provide voice and messaging and emergency service to some of the greatest productivity experiences for the knowledge worker that include video conferencing I think you're familiar with whether it's Cisco Webex, Zoom, BlueJeans, Microsoft Office 365, Skype for Business and Teams or Google Suites, many of those are video rich experiences for those who are in the workplace. So our strategy has been to make sure we are the best choice to complement that experience with both voice services and messaging. And I think that's what you should expect our strategy to continue to be in the years ahead relative to video.

Richard Davis

Analyst · your question.

That’s kind of like a Lego block into those guys. And then quickly, one of the questions I got from some investors was like, look, you guys have kind of round numbers 10% of U.S. phone numbers. Is there a cost effective way to increase this number either U.S. and I think Pat even asked kind of internationally, but is that a scenario or how do you think about that?

David Morken

Analyst · your question.

We think about the benefit of having almost 10% of all the phone numbers in the North American dialing plan on our platform and IP network as fundamental to providing network effects, which is to say more and more calls remain on net as between those numbers. And in these large walled garden enterprises we serve, when they call each other, there's no third-party incremental cost for completing that call that remains on net and that's a powerful financial and quality complement for our strategy. That number of numbers in production continues to climb up into the right as a function of porting numbers from existing Verizon, AT&T and CenturyLink customers over to our network, and we support an extraordinarily large number of phone numbers porting from customers that are finding out of services to be more valuable than the legacy provider. Does that answer your question, Richard?

Richard Davis

Analyst · your question.

Yes, perfect. Thanks so much.

Operator

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, we have reached the end of the question-and-answer session and this concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.