Yongming Wu
Analyst · Macquarie
[Interpreted] Thank you. Let me take that question. Indeed, as a full stack AI service provider, we are currently in a very important investment cycle for AI and investing in our products as well as in our infrastructure. So there are several different places where we're investing and we do have some internal thinking about how we prioritize them, and I can share, I think, some of those considerations with you. First of all, I would say the most critical of those priorities, the first thing that we need to ensure is that we are able to continually train our own foundation models. Because in the AI space overall, the ability of our AI infrastructure to be able to acquire more customers or to be able to acquire more high-value use cases relies on our ability to continually iterate and upgrade our foundation models. We need to be doing that in order to be able to unlock new demand and to acquire new customers by unlocking new risk cases. After that, after unlocking new higher-value use cases, then the next thing is to look at the amount of token consumption as well as token quality as well as the willingness of customers to pay for those tokens and that willingness is going to continue to strengthen gradually. So I would say that, that is one of the highest priorities when it comes to allocating those investments. Another priority is around inference, I'm thinking primarily of inference on -- as a service on Bailian. That is also a relatively high priority area for us because we've created the Bailian platform in order to be able to serve customers all around the world. We want to ensure that those AI resources are available 24 hours a day and are being utilized 24/7 with high efficiency. So the key there is to ensure that one AI server can run at full capacity 24 hours around the clock and thereby to generate more tokens. So Bailian is a very critical resource pool for us, and it's a relatively high priority. Separately, of course, we have internal use cases for AI inferencing. And indeed, we also have external customers who are leveraging our inferencing services to their demand. So that's also part of the picture. But when it comes to these external customers, we also had some criteria for prioritizing different external customers. If an external customer is utilizing all of our services across cloud, all of Alibaba Cloud services, spanning storage, spanning big data and all of these other things, then, of course, that customer would be accorded a higher level of priority. If you have a customer that's merely renting a GPU to meet some very simple inferencing needs then the demands of those customers would accordingly be given a slightly lower level of priority. Moving on to the second question, which I thought was a really good one. I think there are 2 pieces to this issue. The first is the supply side. Second is -- first is the demand side. Second is the supply side. So if we look at the foundation models and this could be video generation models. They could be omni-modal models going forward, but the capabilities continue to increase and be enhanced. And we're not yet seeing any issues in terms of scaling law. Nobody's hit the wall yet, so to speak, in the industry. We continue to make a lot of progress on the very important breakthroughs in terms of model capabilities. As the models become more powerful than the AI models will be able to do more things in the world of being able to serve larger variety of different use cases. And that will result in these models serving a lot of tasks, as the capabilities increase, they become stronger. As these tasks become more deeply embedded across all industries, all aspects of business operations. So with those 2 drivers, we see in the next 3-year period, highly definitive trend of demand for AI. And with all of this rapid growth in demand, we also need to be thinking about the supply side. I'm sure that you, as analysts have also been looking at the supply side. Starting from the second half of this year, I think we've seen worldwide. If you look at fabs, if you look at DRAM vendors, storage companies, CPU manufacturers across all of those different links in the value chain that go to making AI servers, there is a situation of undersupply. Supply is unable to keep up with demand for all of these components globally. And I think that you can expect that to continue throughout this scaling up an investment cycle, driven by real demand for AI, we know that the supply side is going to be a relatively large bottleneck. So I think that it could be at least a period of 2 or 3 years for those different suppliers, those different venues to be able to ramp up their production capacity. So in this period of 2 to 3 years, we can expect to continue to see a rapid increase in demand and that to be driving the supply side. So I think in the next 3 years to come, AI resources will continue to be undersupplied with demand outstripping supply. And what we can see internally in the industry, and if we look at the hyperscalers in the U.S., all of the latest GPUs that are running are running at full capacity and not just them, the last generation GPUs, even GPUs from 3 to 5 years ago, so also several generations back, those GPUs are to this day still running at full capacity. So looking ahead to the next, say, 3 years, we don't really see much of an issue in terms of a so-called AI bubble.