Welcome to the Applied Materials Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded today, May 24, 2011. Please note that today's call will contain forward-looking statements, which are all statements other than those of historical fact, including statements regarding Applied's performance, planned acquisition, industry outlooks, customer spending, market position, and Q3 and fiscal year 2011 business outlooks. All forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. Information concerning these risk factors is contained in today's earnings press release and in the company's filings with the SEC. Forward-looking statements are based on information as of May 24, 2011, and the company assumes no obligation to update such statements. Today's call also contains non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of the non-GAAP measures to GAAP measures are contained in today's earnings release or in the financial highlights slide, which are on the Investor page of our website at www.appliedmaterials.com. I would now like to turn the conference over to Michael Sullivan, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Carrie, and good afternoon. Joining me today are Mike Splinter, our Chairman and CEO; George Davis, our Chief Financial Officer; and Joe Sweeney, our General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Today, we'll discuss the results for our second quarter, which ended on May 1. Our earnings release was issued at 1:05 Pacific Time, and you could find a copy on our website, appliedmaterials.com. Also on the website is our quarterly financial highlights presentation, which provides additional details. Mike Splinter will lead off today's call with comments on the business environment along with our results and strategies. Next, George will discuss our financial performance in Q2 and our expectations for Q3 and the rest of the year. We'll then open the call for your questions. Before we begin, I have a quick calendar announcement. Applied will hold an investor and media briefing at the SEMICON West trade show in San Francisco on Tuesday morning, July 12, Pacific Time. We hope to see many of you at the event, and we'll have a live webcast and replay for anyone who won't be able to join us in person. We'll be sure to provide you with further details about the event over the next few weeks. And with that, I would like to hand the call over to Mike Splinter.

Thanks, Mike, and good afternoon to everyone on the call today. I'm pleased to report that for the first half of our fiscal year, Applied delivered record revenue and earnings. Our second fiscal quarter was one of the strongest financial performances in our history. We posted revenue of $2.9 billion and operating margin of 24%. Our earnings were at the high end of our target range, and we generated $704 million in operating cash flow. Our Solar business had an exceptionally strong quarter. With net sales of $637 million, EES [Energy and Environmental Solutions] set new records for revenue and profitability. Overall, I'm very pleased with our execution, results and progress towards our strategic goals. Shortly after the close of the quarter, we announced our intention to acquire Varian Semiconductor for a net price of $4.3 billion. We believe this represents our best and largest acquisition opportunity in the semiconductor equipment space. Varian adds a critical component, enabling us to provide customers with a full product portfolio for transistor fabrication and material modification. Keeping Moore's law in track has become a multifaceted challenge requiring new materials, new chip architectures and new approaches to transistor formation. By combining the strengths of Applied and Varian, our teams will work hand-in-hand with customers to accelerate the industry's technology road map. We are excited about the opportunities this will deliver for our customers, shareholders and employees. Let me spend a few moments on the state of the economy and outlook for our markets. In recent months, we have seen a combination of events that are affecting the short-term economic outlook. Rising inflation in emerging markets and reduced consumer confidence have created an environment that necessitates caution. Unrest in the Middle East has resulted in uncertainty about energy prices and fuel cost. In addition, the…

Thank you, Mike. Good afternoon and thank you all for joining us today. We exceeded our target for net sales in the second quarter and delivered earnings per share at the high end of the range. During the quarter, we also raised our dividend by 14% to $0.08 per share and generated operating cash flow of more than $700 million. These results demonstrate the positive impact of our operations and comp initiatives over the past few years, the strength of our products in the marketplace and the relatively strong market conditions experienced in the quarter, even as some customers began to adjust their spending plans in light of the economic challenges Mike discussed. I'll now compare our results to last quarter. Orders rose 7% to $3.2 billion, led by growth in Display and Silicon. Our book-to-bill ratio for the quarter was 1.1. Our backlog increased 10% to $3.9 billion. We're seeing some modest aging, but we expect about 80% of the backlog to turn in the second half of our fiscal year. Net sales increased 7% to $2.9 billion, with higher-than-expected sales in all segments except our Silicon Systems Group. Non-GAAP gross margin of 41.9% was nearly one point lower, driven primarily by the higher mix of EES net sales. Non-GAAP operating expenses were $513 million and would have been $528 million excluding a nonrecurring benefit. We expect our third quarter OpEx to again be about $530 million, with a range of plus or minus $10 million. Our non-GAAP effective tax rate was in line with our full year expectations at 27.9%. Operating cash flow was very strong at $704 million, or 25% of sales. Cash flow benefited from higher revenue levels, strong working capital management and the front-end loaded payment structures for our Solar shipments. We returned $211 million…

[Operator Instructions] Carrie, let's please begin.

[Operator Instructions] And your first question comes from Atif Malik with Morgan Stanley.

Thanks for taking my question. George, in order for you to meet the prior full year outlook, you said that the demand has to improve and 4Q has to be up over 3Q. Which segments are important to be able for you to meet the prior forecast in 4Q? Is it going to be the Silicon business that has to inflect up?

Yes. I mean, we always expected EES to be a little bit soft in the fourth quarter, so we're really dependent on a return to growth in SSG.

Okay. And then just follow-up, on the foundry side, you've seen the divergence at 65-nanometer utilization and leading-edge 40- and 28-nanometer utilization. More recently, there has been some chatter that the demand for the month of June has started to improve for foundries and utilization of leading-edge, and overall utilization is going to improve. Are the discussions with foundries pretty fluid at this point, and that's why that explains the range of the guidance?

Well, the discussions are pretty much along the lines that you just pointed out. 65-nanometer has been weak. There's some projection that it's going to come back and be more fully utilized in the next few months, but they're being cautious about that and focusing their investment on expanding capacity at the most advanced node, virtually at every foundry. But the 3 big foundries that have technology at 32 nanometers are really the one -- and below are really the ones pushing forward today.

Your next question comes from C.J. Muse with Barclays Capital.

Thank you for taking my question. I just was hoping to, I guess, dig a little bit deeper on the Silicon side. You talked about Silicon revenues in the second half looking like the first half. And given the guidance down, I guess it would imply that you do expect Silicon revenues up in Q4. And so I guess the question is, am I interpreting that right? And is that what your backlog is telling you today?

Yes, I think you're interpreting it correctly. In order for us to be flat, we have to be up modestly in SSG in the fourth quarter. And it's one of the reasons why we haven't walked away from the $11 billion and $1.50. It's certainly far more at risk than previously, but we think that there's still a chance that you'll see an increase in spending in our fourth fiscal quarter.

CJ, our view on wafer fab equipment spending has always been that first quarter and fourth quarter would be the biggest quarters on wafer fab equipment spending, with lower investment in Q2 and Q3 of the calendar year. And so that's kind of the way our fiscal year plays out. We have to have a pretty solid October to reach those numbers.

That's helpful. Real quickly on LCD, can you share with us your view on CapEx including LTPS and touch panels? What your outlook is for calendar '11? And if you have early view on calendar '12?

We think that in calendar 2011, when you sum it all up, including touch panels and low-temperature polysilicon, it'd be down about 10% or 15%. We think, again in 2012, those areas are going to be -- the touch panel and high-performance displays are going to be very strong and grow. I think the big question is how quickly the China investments are going to take place. And if they go through in the first half of 2012, we're going to see a very strong 2012 in Display, and should be certainly a record for us.

Your next question comes from Krish Sankar with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Thanks for taking my question. I have 2. Mike, your comment on the second half being flat. If you just targeted and assumed that your fiscal second half was similar to this calendar second half, would your confidence level be higher? Is it -- I mean, is it basically a matter of timing, or do you feel like the customer has still not come back to the table yet?

I'm sorry, I didn't quite hear. Your voice cut out a little bit in the middle of that. Could you repeat that question again? I'm sorry.

Sorry about that. If you had to assume that your fiscal second half was similar to the calendar second half, would you feel more confident in your SSG business in calendar second half? In other words, are customers indicating they'll comeback in the second half, or are you just being more cautious?

Yes, I think we think that as you get closer to year end, that things start to strengthen again, so that the pushouts start to come back in. Whether we can call that they'll come into our fourth fiscal quarter or into the fourth calendar quarter, I think it's a little premature.

Got it. And then just a follow-up, just wanted to get a sense of what your customers are telling you or what is the feedback post your Varian acquisition announcement?

Sure. Overall, as you can imagine, we've talked to pretty much every customer that would be affected. And overall, the feedback has been quite positive. They see, as the industry matures and as their segments have consolidated, that the equipment segment needs some consolidation as well. So I would say on the whole, quite positive.

Your next question comes from Jim Covello Goldman Sachs.

Thanks so much for taking the question. I guess on the foundry side, do you think the issue is more that the foundries are seeing weakening demand, or that they've already added a lot of capacity and they have a lot more coming? Or kind of, what do you think the breakdown is between those 2 dynamics that's causing them to soften up the orders a little bit?

Sure, Jim. Thanks for the question. I think the primary look is they're adding capacity at the leading edge, and the leading edge is fully subscribed. And it's fully subscribed at every one of the leading foundries. So I don't think there's a lot of play here, and that's where they're going to continue to focus their capacity growth. I think when you look at it, the dynamics of what's happened in the last few months, that a lot of the growth is focused on smart phones, which really demand 40 nanometers and beyond, 32-nanometer capability, to be able to satisfy the processing speed. Those things are going to be up something on the order close to 70% this year, I think even stronger than last year. So I think that's a big focus right now, along with tablets as a new category driving capacity. The new tablets require a lot bigger die, and again, driving towards the more advanced nodes. I think if there is a surprise for the foundry guys, it's that the subscription on 65 is lower than they would've thought. And that's where the pushouts in capacity adds are.

That's helpful. If I could just ask a follow-up, and I afraid to ask the question. But I think what you guys are doing with the Varian acquisition is tremendous. It was really, really intelligent, and Varian's a phenomenal asset to be buying. But I guess we'll get the questions from customers, so we just we just want to ask you guys, is there anything about what's going on with the cycle that changes your willingness to acquire Varian and/or pay the price that the deal was consummated at?

Absolutely, we -- absolutely not. We're very excited about the Varian acquisition, Jim. You can see how the strategies line up between the 2 companies. The products are very complementary. We believe that there's complexity increase going on and investment intensity increasing in WFE. So all those things make this acquisition make tremendous sense for Applied Materials and for Varian. We're just been thinking about all the areas we can work together to enhance solutions for our customers, and think that's going to have a big positive impact over the next few years. George, you want to add anything on that?

I would just add that when we look at acquisitions, and we've had, I think, a pretty good track record, we use pretty fundamental analysis, discounted cash flow. And I can tell you our models assume that we're still a cyclical business. And so there is an appreciation for the fact that you can't predict the cycles, but you can get a sense for valuation over time. And you really look at other ways that we can add value together. We've talked about the obvious areas, like synergies. But really, helping them take their foray into some of the markets where we're more experienced, like Solar and Display, can create value. And also, we think there's a lot of crossover then you start getting implant engineers together with some of our thermal engineers, and that some interesting things can come out of that. I think, also in the etch side, there's going to be some interesting products that come out of it. So there's a lot of areas where joint development is going to create, I think, solutions for customers that will create value for us.

Your next question comes from Timothy Arcuri with Citi.

A couple of things. George, I'm just trying to bridge the gap between the bookings that you have in April and the revenue that you're guiding in July. It would suggest that there was at least a couple of hundred million dollars worth of pushouts in the Silicon business, or it would suggest that the bookings in July in the Silicon business will be down about 30% versus what they were in April. So I'm wondering if those numbers are right, number one. And then, number two, I had a question on margins in SSG. If you can help quantify, maybe, what some of the impact is from the Samsung settlement. Is that costing you a couple of hundred basis points worth of margins in that business?

Tim, I think the first part of your analysis, which says there has to be pushouts, we've certainly seen pushouts, and that's part of the factor. But if you look at our backlog, you're still going to see 80% of that turn between this quarter and next quarter, and about 50% of it during this quarter. Also in the SSG side, as you know, we've been in a very high turns environment for the past 4 or 5 quarters. A little less so in this quarter. So some of the longer lead time customers are adding to the order book, so it doesn't necessarily turn in the first quarter, first quarter out. So those are factors. In terms of margins on SSG, I think clearly, the Samsung agreement has an impact. As we've said, relative to the overall model, we think over time, the downside case is that it takes a point off of the operating model. It's a little more front-end loaded when we first get started. But really, I think what you're seeing is more investment in TR&D opportunities that's impacting us in the near term.

Your next question comes from Stephen Chin with UBS.

Just another follow-up question on that Silicon business, George. So with the backlog in Silicon growing 19% in the quarter, it does seem like the momentum is strong. So is it just a one-quarter pushout that you think might be being seen here in the industry? Is that why silicon sales might be up in the fourth quarter? Is that kind of the key read?

Yes. I think that's -- I mean, I think that is a reasonable scenario for the second half of the year. We haven't put a forecast out for Q4, but that's certainly one of the outcomes that we could see as a reasonable outcome. But part of it's going to be you're going to have to see kind of a reversal of what we've seen for the last quarter, which is some of these consumer devices where we've had remarkably high growth rates quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year actually had negative growth in the last quarter. I think that's one of the things that really affected some of the foundry customers to pull back, as they weren't able to get through a lot of inventory. As you say, there are some signs that, that is going to be less of a factor going forward, but we've got to see the consumer demand side pick back up.

Okay. And then Mike, can you share any early thoughts on 2012 in WFE? It looks like WFE 2011 was a little bit lower than originally expected. So can 2012 WFE be a bit higher than expected? Or is it still tracking kind of flattish, would you think?

Well, I think where we're at in 2012 is pretty much where we were at Analyst Day, $35 billion plus or minus a couple of billion. And the puts and takes, of course, haven't changed all that much, except I would say that some of these pushouts that may go into 2012 would actually strengthen our view at the current time.

Your next question comes from Satya Kumar with Credit Suisse. [Technical Difficulty] Satya Kumar - Crédit Suisse AG: Back in this question on pushouts, so you mentioned that there was some economic-type reasons and demand weaknesses that were leading customers to pause and push out the equipment requirements on the logic, foundry side. I was wondering if there was any non-economic "strategic" sort of reasons where customers are unsure on large movement in market share, for example, that's causing customers to also take a little bit more time, in terms of capacity additions?

Specifically on market share. Market share is moving to those companies that have the most capacity at the leading edge. Obviously, there's a couple of those that have invested in capacity at the leading edge, certainly in foundry and logic. So I think you can see some movement in share, in particular, in this quarter. And then longer-term, it'll depend how fast the other foundry competitors get their capacity on line at 32 in particular, even 45 nanometers. Satya Kumar - Crédit Suisse AG: In planning the 450 millimeter, can you give us an update on where you stand on that? When do you expect to ship the first alpha to customers?

Well, as we certainly haven't established a ship date, there's a lot of work to do on 450 millimeter, to look at automation and chamber design and how we're going to approach it. So we still think that the production dates are in the 2015 to 2017 timeframe. We'll have to start investing more in 2012. But I don't think we're ready to publish a time when we're going to ship alpha tools. But it will be when customers need them.

Your next question comes from Mehdi Hosseini with Susquehanna International.

Yes. Thanks for taking my question. I have 2. First, Mike, is there any change in the memory customer, such as consolidation, that is having more of a structural impact on how much spending by memory-type customers are out there? And then just from a big picture, if I understand you correctly, the CapEx budget for this year has not changed, there is pushout, so doesn't that mean that the July or October quarter are going to be better than what you were expecting during the analyst event, because the CapEx budget have not changed given the pushouts?

Why don't I take that second question first, Mehdi. The pushout, it just depends on whether it pushes 1 quarter or 2 quarters. And I think that will depend on, again, the economic factors out there. Everybody's reading the same tea leaves on this.

So from the memory standpoint, I still think by far the largest impact on memory investment, let's take DRAM first, is just the bit growth. We're kind of seeing bit growth in the 40% to 50% range, which really isn't enough to drive significant capacity. I do think that there can be difficulty in some of the smaller DRAM companies to get financing and have money available. But certainly, the big 3 DRAM companies have cash available and could invest in capacity if they need it. We do expect to see more investment in the second half in DRAM, but still very small on relative terms, comparing back to any of the recent peaks of wafer fab equipment spending. DRAM is less than 1/3 of where it was in those times. So I think this is more really about bit growth. In flash, I think it's more timing. I think in particular, the soft tablet growth in Q1 allowed some of the NAND guys to push out. But again, we expect them to come back in the second half and grow their investment. We also still expect NAND investment to be larger than DRAM this year. That view hasn't changed.

I looked at Q-Manda [ph], it's out as DRAM out of Taiwan has marginalized. I looked at every presentation slide by the top memory manufacturers, they all talk about increased importance of return on invested capital and lower CapEx spending. So I look at all of those trends, and quite frankly, it kind of suggests less spending compared to previous cycles. So what gives the confidence that 40%, 50% bit growth is not enough?

Well, historically, it hasn't been enough to push capacity up, because moving generation node-to-node allows them to get significantly more productivity or more chips per wafer. And it just -- they have to have demand to be able to invest. I do agree that the smaller number of customers investing can have more discipline, and you can get less accentuated cycles, but in the end, it's a matter of supply and demand.

Your next question comes from Edwin Mok with Needham & Company. Edwin Mok - Needham & Company, LLC: Thanks for taking my question. So if I look at your prior full year guidance, obviously you're now reiterating it here. But if I look at the $1.50 earnings that you potentially can earn this year, and look at your midpoint of the third quarter guidance, that would imply a pretty big increase in earnings for the fourth quarter. Do you expect better margins in the coming quarters? And specifically, is that coming from just recovery on the SSG? Can you help me on that?

Well, I think you'll see gross margin improve a little bit just on mix alone. We've also seen AGS had some margin issues this year related to 200-millimeter. We said they're pretty much through all of that by the fourth quarter, so we expect to get that benefit. But really, it's going to require SSG revenues to come back up. And as you know, that flows through at a very high rate. And so we'll just have to see how that plays out. But your analysis is correct. Edwin Mok - Needham & Company, LLC: Great, very helpful. And then just maybe a little longer-term question. I think, Mike, in your prepared remarks, you talk about cell capacity, adding around 20 gigawatts this year. And it sounds like this is going to be a great year for Solar equipment. Just wondering how do you guys feel about the cycle? Are you worried that you look out 2012 that you might have a cycle pause in the solar equipment space?

We're monitoring what we think is effective capacity in our customer base. There a lot of things going on in the solar industry with share shifting and feed-in tariff reduction and then those who can really reach the cost necessary. You can see today that prices, cell prices, are coming down, spot prices are at $1, around $1. Poly prices are coming down quite dramatically to be able to fit into the envelope that these new feed-in tariffs are indicating. So at the same time, we're seeing the leading edge guys continue to invest in capacity because they want to be ahead on capacity, especially in a market where material costs are coming down, so that they don't have to have cells in inventory which are depreciating in value at a relatively fast pace. So in front of the feed-in tariff changes, we always see a pretty big surge in installations and deployment. And I don't think this year is going to be any different than that in the third quarter and then near the end of the year. So I think what we're seeing for capacity, kind of effective capacity going into 2012 is something around 40 gigawatts in the customer base. That's ahead of where we think installations will be, but that's true this year, too. And we are seeing pretty much record capacity expenditures in the solar field today.

Your next question comes from Mahesh Sanganeria with RBC Capital.

Mike, just the question again on your comment you said what happened in the second half. So if I look at second half flat from the first half on SSG, your revenue has to grow 9% in Q4. The question I have is that why do you need to see for that to happen? Are you expecting a specific -- the PC demand to improve or the handset demand to improve? Is it the foundries that have to order more, or the NAND? If you can give some more color on to what are the puts and takes that could drive that upside in Q4.

Sure, this is George. Let me add a little color or add to that question here. Our view is that it just takes about one customer, with the amount of concentration that we have, that comes back, and just like the pushouts have been pretty concentrated, you could easily see 9% with an increase in foundry. You could see it -- NAND flash is certainly softer than we had anticipated in the second half of the year. There's a lot of reasons for that, but those reasons could also reverse themselves, the customers could have more confidence and we could see that in our fourth quarter. Those 2 alone could take us well above up 10% in the fourth quarter. But also, again, as Mike said, we're operating at a very low level of DRAM. And if customers start to see some firming in that kind of 3 strong quarters of down price for DRAM, you start to see a reversal in that, and people start to get a little more confident, you could see DRAM come back a little bit early. But I would say foundry and flash are probably the first place.

And then on the flat panel side, you said that you have seen some pushouts, but you see a big jump in revenue here. Going forward, do you basically see that flat line in the flat panel on the revenues?

No, what we said is we think we'll be up more than 25% in Q3 versus Q2. So I think the second half of the year is going to be much stronger. I think first and foremost, we're still seeing strong demand for touch panels and OLED. In fact, it's stronger than we had seen even last time. It's the large panel fabs, many of which are going to be built in China, that have been pushed out. So we may start to see orders for those in our fourth quarter, but maybe in the early part of '12. But in general, overall, we think spending will be up by a healthy amount in the second half.

Your next question comes from Patrick Ho with Stifel, Nicolaus. Patrick Ho - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Just maybe a little more color in terms of the foundry pushouts that you've mentioned. Could some of those orders for 65 nanometers potentially convert to 40, 45 nanometers as they continue to add on back capacity? Since you also mentioned that they feel that they're still constrained on that front.

Yes, they certainly could. And while we haven't seen that yet, that would be a scenario for a strong Q4. If either 65-nanometer capacity comes back, or they up their investment at the leading edge nodes where capacity is much more constrained. Patrick Ho - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Okay, great. And maybe just a bigger picture question with Intel's recent announcement about the Tri-gate process technology and the layers involved there. Given your broad-based coverage across a lot of their -- across their production lines, where do you see the biggest incremental benefits? Specifically within Applied Materials, what process segments do you see incremental benefits from this transition?

Yes. Well, first of all, this is a new technique to make transistors. And I kind of alluded to it a bit in the prepared remarks. But we think that this technique, over a period of time, will be adopted, or a similar technique will be adopted to make high-performance transistors by all the logic makers. It just depends when they are able to put it into production. But it clearly lowers power and improves performance. So for us, I think one of the areas, of course, as we've moved to high-k/metal gate, PVD and CMP have been big beneficiaries. As we move into the next generations, we're going to see more epi steps, significantly more epi steps in the channel, as well as in the source/drain. And then plasma doping, because of the shape of these transistors, plasma doping, this is a structure that lends itself well to plasma doping. And we think that this will be one of those trends that really allows plasma doping to get into high-volume.

Your next question comes from Gus Richard with Piper Jaffray.

Thanks for taking my question. First [indiscernible] nanometer, 28 nanometer chips are coming out of the foundries. Any thoughts on sort of how those are ramping for your customers? And if yields are better than expected, worse than expected, how do you think that might impact your business over the next several quarters?

Well, I would just say that leading-edge is constrained today. I don't think we can really comment about our customers' specific performance, but I think the overall indicator when we check with our leading foundry customers, everyone is constrained on the leading-edge. And where there's -- so there's competition for capacity there. Are there sub rationales for why it's constrained? I wouldn't want to comment on that, but people are moving quickly to expand capacity there.

And then to follow on, having followed the industry for a long time, typically, when I've seen pushouts of this magnitude, they're usually followed by cancellations. Is there anything that gives you confidence that the next step isn't going to happen?

Gus, I didn't hear. "Followed by?" you broke up there.

I'm sorry, followed by cancellations.

Right. Yes, we really try to monitor the quality of our backlog, and George might want to comment. But at this point, we haven't seen any cancellations to speak of. If we would have, we would've mentioned it. And the big players in our backlog right now are not those that have historically canceled. George, do you want to comment?

Yes. Right now, I think when you look at the aging of the backlog, it looks fine. And like I said, particularly with SSG, you've got -- over 50% of the backlog is going to go out in the next quarter, and you got 30% in the quarter after that. So right now, it looks healthy, but we always have the same concern that you have, which is you've got to watch this very closely and make sure that you balance everything from the way you look at your inventory to everything as you see this kind of behavior. But again, I think it really reflects the near-term economic conditions that Mike talked about. And we'll see if they worsen or things start to moderate and get better.

That's right, and Gus, I think we do have to see a return of growth in tablets in a significant way and those supply constraints come off, or we may have -- we may see other kinds of actions taken. But we're going to closely monitor this. I think we're still relatively optimistic about what's going to happen the rest of the year and the growth of the world economy, so -- and just popularity of the electronics devices we have in the market today.

Your next question comes from Thomas Diffely with D.A. Davidson & Co. Thomas Diffely - D.A. Davidson & Co.: I was hoping to step back and just get your view of the PC cycle right now. And specifically, where you think we are in terms of a Windows 7 buildout or a refresh cycle, as well as some of these emerging markets over the next year or 2?

Well, I think that right now in PC cycle, we were not particularly encouraged that after Q1, sequentially down 10%. We think that emerging markets really are the key to growth in PCs, especially, in particular China, where we think that PC growth can be dramatic. And we need to see notebook growth return in a significant way. Right now, our estimates on PC growth for the year are between 6% and 10%. Earlier, we thought it would be more, greater than 10%, but after first quarter, we kind of tempered our view. I can certainly speak about Applied Materials moving to Windows 7. We're making the transition, and I have made the transition, and think that now is the right time for many corporations to do that. There's really a change in the way you can do computing across the company that Windows 7 enables. So it seems like the right time. I don't have good data on how the penetration is going. I'm sure our customers in Intel would have a better view. Thomas Diffely - D.A. Davidson & Co.: Okay. But when you look out at 2012, do think the emerging markets could, by themselves, drive a nice DRAM investment cycle? Or do you really need the domestic market coming back as well?

I think we need a strong PC market, overall. What we've said, and I think this is still true today, if PCs are growing 10% or 15% and smartphones continue their growth trend, we're going to see return of investment in the DRAM space. We think that would drive bit growth above 50% and necessitate pretty significant investment. While we haven't thought that DRAM investment would get back to its levels in 2006 and 2007, it's at such a discount today that we think it could double from today's levels and still be a prudent investment for the DRAM makers.

Your last question comes from Timothy Arcuri with Citi.

Mike, I just wanted to see if you can give us any idea of sort of what the concentration is of the $1.45 billion worth of SSG backlog. Is that -- I would think it's pretty heavily concentrated amongst a very small number of customers. I'm wondering if you could feel comfortable to give us any idea there. And lastly, since you were very intimately involved in the 300-millimeter transition when you were at Intel, I'm sort of wondering how, now that you're on the other side, given how much the equipment suppliers got burned during that shift, how you plan to sort of take what you learned from the chip side and make sure that you don't get burned this time from the tool side.

George, you want to comment on backlog, and then I'll comment on 450.

Sure. Tim, as you know, some of the larger customers have been part of the reason for why you have high turns business on our orders. And so actually, the distribution of the orders is broader than you might think. It's not nearly as concentrated as our revenue is in the backlog and it really reflects the technology. A lot of is technology as well as capacity requirements of these customers. So the backlog is not over-weighted. You do have, obviously, a large logic presence there. And the foundries are certainly reflected, but at a much lower level than their overall share of the spending right now. Is that helpful for you?

It is. Yes, George.

I'd say a couple of things about the 450 transition that we're trying to look for in working with our customers. The first one is, is there a win-win window for both the suppliers and the customers, a space where they can get their cost reduction and we can still have a reasonable market that's going to grow over a period of time? The next one is the customers that are going to convert need to decide to convert on one node. One of the things -- and really aim the development at one node in technology. In the 300-millimeter, there was an initial fab at 250 nanometers. The real conversion didn't happen until -- really start in earnest until 130 nanometers. And then maybe the final thing I'd say is they really have to aim at a specific timing that we're going to really try to be able to stick through 2 despite cycles. Other thing that had happened in 300-millimeter is the transition got delayed several times because of the industry cycles. So those 3 things are topics that we're having serious discussions with the key players that are interested in 450.

Great. Thank you, Jim, for your question. And we'd like to thank everyone for joining us this afternoon. A replay of this call will be available on our website beginning at 5 p.m. Pacific Time today. Thank you for your continued interest in Applied Materials.

This concludes today's conference. You may now disconnect.