Welcome to the Applied Materials First Quarter of Fiscal 2011 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note that today's call will contain forward-looking statements, which are all statements other than those of historical fact, including statements regarding Applied's performance, industry outlooks, market positions, products, operational initiative, expenses, tax rate, segment performance, expectations and Q2 and fiscal 2011 business outlook. All forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. Information concerning these risk factors is contained in today's earnings press release and in the company's filings with the SEC. Forward-looking statements are based on information as of November 24, 2011, and the company assumes no obligation to update such statements. Today's call also contains non-GAAP financial measures, reconciliations of the non-GAAP measures to GAAP measures are contained in today's earnings release or in the financial highlights slides, which are on the Investor page of our website at appliedmaterials.com. I would now like to turn the call over to Michael Sullivan, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Carrie, and good afternoon. Joining me today are Mike Splinter, our Chairman and CEO; George Davis, our Chief Financial Officer; and Joe Sweeney, our General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Today, we'll discuss the results for our first quarter, which ended on January 30. Our earnings release was issued at 1:05 Pacific Time, and you can find a copy on our website, appliedmaterials.com. Also on the website is our quarterly financial highlights presentation, which provides additional details. Mike Splinter will lead off today's call with comments on the business environments, along with our results and strategies. And then next, George will discuss our financial performance in Q1 and our expectations for Q2 and the rest of the year. We'll then open the call for your questions. Before we begin, I have a quick calendar announcement. Applied will hold its 2011 Investor and Analyst Meeting in New York City on the morning of March 23, local time. We hope to see many of you there, and we'll have a live webcast and replay for anyone who won't be able to join us in person. We'll be sure to provide you with further details about the event over the next few weeks. And with that, I would like to hand the call over to Mike Splinter.

Thanks, Mike, and good afternoon to everyone on the call today. I'm pleased to report that Applied Materials started our 2011 fiscal year with a very solid first quarter. We posted revenue of $2.7 billion, generated $659 million of non-GAAP operating income and delivered earnings that exceeded the high end of our target. Orders were approximately $3 billion, backlog is building, and our outlook for the year as a whole is improving. For Applied, 2010 was a year of share gains and increasing profitability. We have carried this momentum into 2011. I'm especially pleased with the performance of our innovation engine. Last year, Applied ranked eighth in the U.S. and 33rd in the world for international PCT patent filings. I'd like to recognize our technologists and engineers for this noteworthy achievement. Let me now turn to the economic outlook. 2010 was a strong recovery year across the board, and 2011 is shaping up to be even better for our Semiconductor Service and Solar businesses. Since the start of the year, we have seen increasing optimism about the macro environment, although this is tempered with realism about risk factors, including inflation, political instability and unemployment. Strong demand for consumer electronics is being generated by innovative new products, and this is driving our Semiconductor and Display customers to invest in capacity and new technology. The market for smartphones grew 55% in 2010, and similar growth is forecast for 2011. We've seen the promise of the tablet market being realized, with 11 million units sold in the last three months of the year. There is an exciting lineup of new tablets ready for launch, and we expect sales to be in the range of 60 million to 70 million units this year. The solar market exceeded our expectations in 2010, with over six…

Thank you, Mike, and let me add my welcome to everyone joining us on the call today. During our first quarter of 2011, Applied delivered earnings and net sales above the high end of our target ranges, led by our SSG and EES segments. Compared to our results from one year ago, net sales were up 45%, and non-GAAP earnings per share grew more than 170%. This performance highlights the financial leverage in our business models and underpins the strong year-over-year earnings performance improvement we expect to see in 2011. Now I will review our results versus the prior quarter. Orders were down slightly, with significant growth in Solar, partially offsetting reductions in our other businesses. Backlog increased to $3.5 billion, a 9% increase. Net sales declined 7% to $2.7 billion, as record Crystalline Silicon sales partially offset the expected drop in thin film solar and display sales. Non-GAAP gross margin of 43% was up slightly from last quarter, as improved EES margins more than offset lower margins in our other segments. Non-GAAP operating expenses of $486 million were better than our target range. This quarter included some onetime savings. And absent these items, expenses would have been at about the midpoint of our target range. Next quarter, we expect OpEx will fall within the range of $510 million to $530 million, with the increases targeted for field support of Semiconductor customers and to address market share opportunities. These customers are investing aggressively to ramp technology and capacity and expect us to increase our support. This theme is expected to continue throughout the year. Non-GAAP earnings per share were $0.36. GAAP earnings per share were $0.38 and included the benefit of an adjustment to our restructuring reserves and the R&D tax credit. Our tax rate for the quarter was 25.5%…

Thanks, George. And to help us reach as many of you as we can, please ask just one question and no more than one brief follow-up. Carrie, let's please begin.

[Operator Instructions] And your first question comes from Jim Covello with Goldman Sachs.

This is Mark Delaney calling for Jim. Mike, I was wondering if you could start -- I know in prior quarters, you were more cautious that there could be potentially some excess supply building in the Crystalline Solar segment. I was wondering if you could give us an update behind what's making you more positive on the outlook for that area now.

Sure. Well, there's a number of things. If we just start with demand, if we look at Q4, we saw over 6 gigawatts of capacity, of module capacity being installed in the field in Q4. When you look at that on a run rate basis, that requires about 25 gigawatts of yearly capacity. We think, operationally, today, there is about 28 gigawatts that are really in effective production. So that means all the factories are full. That's why our major customers are seeing factories full, and that's why they're aggressively adding capacity. Still and now when you think about end demand for 2011, we think it's going to be very strong. As I said, we think Germany and Italy will lead the way, but there are just many other countries getting into the mix, not only in Europe but now throughout the rest of the world. Still, our visibility into the second half, while it's improving and I would say strengthening, it's still hard to see in this market the second half of the year. We have to see continued demand growth to justify the capacity. But today, there is not enough silicon, not enough wafering capacity to meet the demand that we expect to occur this year.

And George, a quick follow-up question for you. You talked about increasing OpEx for some targeted opportunities, wondering if this changes any of your longer-term plans on the cost reduction opportunities from the move to Singapore.

No, it really doesn't change our plans. The move of activities out of our Singapore operations hub is a long-term commitment to, number one, first and foremost, meeting our customers' needs with the shortest possible cycle times. We have a largely Asia-based customer base now, and so there's a lot of reason to continue that. The spending is really more a function of opportunities. We wanted to build on our market share momentum in the semiconductor area. But also just the sheer volume of activity that we're seeing picking up with our customers, they're looking for us to help them. A lot of this activity is at the very leading edge. And so it's something that we need to do, and we think we'll have a very good return.

Your next question comes from Krish Sankar with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Number one, Mike, you hinted that the second half should be better than the first half. Is that across all your different segments? Or is it mostly Silicon and SPD? Can we expect EES/Solar to slowdown in fiscal second half?

Well, we do expect Silicon and Services and Display to have a better second half. I think the unknown is exactly what's going to happen in Q3 and Q4 in Solar. And as I said, our view is strengthening, but we still have to get some conviction. And we'll talk about it a little bit more in the Analyst Meeting at the end of March and give you an update of that time, but you essentially have it right.

And Krish, think about it. We're running at almost a $2 billion a year run rate for Solar right now, which is almost 2x what we had forecasted at the beginning of the year. So we think the year is going to be better, but it's too early to say if it's going to be that good.

And then a quick follow-up, George. I mean, you've done a fantastic job in the operational enhancement. Which innings are we in that? And how do we think about it going forward? Because given that you're shipping, at the same time you're trying to lower cost, where do you think the steady state OpEx should be at a $2.7 billion run rate for you guys?

Krish, in the deeply cyclical business, there, it's very hard to get a single run rate. But the fact of the matter is we feel very good about where our cost structure is today and that the types of things that we're flexing are the things that you want to flex in response to opportunities, but we still have a very strong variable cost structure. And so we know that if we need to, we have the ability to flex the other way as well. In terms of kind of our what inning we're in, we have a continuous improvement mentality. So we don't believe in innings. We kind of -- you got to keep looking for opportunities to be more efficient and effective. And so I would say though, just to use your analogy, we're in the early innings still in our Singapore operations hub. So there's -- I think over the next five years, we'll see the full benefit of that, but our mentality about continuous improvement is intact.

Your next question comes from Stephen Chin with UBS.

I wanted to follow up on how to think about the Silicon segment operating margin going forward. I was wondering if this negative impact in the January quarter from, I guess, the settlement with Samsung kind of onetime in nature, maybe from some pent-up demand from Samsung? Or is the Solar operating margin penalty kind of the right way to think about Silicon margins for the rest of 2011?

Stephen, as we said, we think the effect of the settlement doesn't fundamentally pull us out of our business model for the Semiconductor business. Worst case, maybe one point. And quite frankly, I think what you're seeing is we came off of a very, very strong Q4. If you look over the last several quarters, this Q1 '11 would actually be the second strongest quarter they've had in multiple quarters in terms of operating margin. So I think we had a little bit of a mix issue compared to Q4, a little bit of impact of the settlement, but the business model's intact.

And then maybe a follow-up question, Mike, for the Silicon market share gain goals. I know you gained two points last year, and you're thinking it could be one point this year. I know you said mix is having that impact. Is that just because DRAM customers are spending less this year, and that's where you got some strong share? Or is there more to that?

No more to it than that. We've been surprised how far down the DRAM orders and revenue have dropped and how fast they've dropped. We knew that DRAM wasn't going to spend as much, but it's running at a pretty low level right now. I don't want to make too big of a deal about that, but we're pretty confident about our share gain. With foundry spending, we're going to gain in PVD and CMP. And people at 28 nanometers now have to buy a new radical inspection equipment, and we've positioned our tools there very, very nicely. So I think those areas are going to provide the biggest pop on share gain in SSG.

Your next question comes from Atif Malik with Morgan Stanley.

A question on the Display intensity. You talked about how the Semiconductor intensity is rising because of the foundries, and we've seen pretty large investments made by Apple and Qualcomm and other guys in the small to medium display panels and screens for smartphones and tablets. So I was wondering if you can talk about your dollar opportunity per unit of that CapEx. And as a follow-up, if you can talk about whether you would be willing do some kind of a joint venture with your customers in setting up a line or two.

So in Display, we kind of have this segmented in the more traditional TV market, where I commented investments will be down. Now there's almost like there's the new segment here with touch panels, with OLED and the high-performance LCD displays for tablets and smartphones. And what we're seeing this year is about a $500 million overall investment for that. We'll get -- our products will get more than half of that, actually probably more than 60% of that spending. We think that spending is going to continue and increase into next year as both volume goes up and more companies adopt these high-performance displays. We think there's really no choice there but to add on to it. As far as -- I think customers, especially the customers who need to invest in this space, are quite capable of supplying the dollars. I don't think that -- we want to supply to all of them, and I think it would not be a good idea at this point for us to JV with just one of them.

Your next question comes from Tim Arcuri with Citigroup.

As it relates to your share, if I look at your WFE share, it was about 20%. If I sort of back into the numbers for calendar 2010, that's about flat with what it was the year prior despite probably there'll be some packaging revenues in there as well. So how would you expect your share to sort of shake out moving forward in the next few years? Because it doesn't appear like you're really gaining share yet in WFE.

Well, I think, Tim, if we look at our number for 2009, it was pretty close to 18-plus percent, and our number for '10 is 27%. So we can get off-line and get the details, so we can make sure we have the right numbers. And so just add another percent this year, but we think that this trend of one to two points a year can continue for a few years.

And then Mike, just as I -- if you look at the bookings, if the second half of the fiscal year is or if the revenue for the fiscal year will be more second half loaded, that would seem to imply another strong bookings quarter in April, probably in the similar range. So if I sort of look at that, does that imply, given that you're sort of at a $12 billion bookings run rate and you're saying that revenue for the year will be $11-plus billion, does that sort of imply that bookings have topped out here? Or do you think, as you kind of look at how all the business mix together, that bookings can still go higher here throughout the rest of the year?

Tim, it's George. Why don't I take a shot at that. Our view is we're clearly seeing very strong bookings for the Solar business right now. We expect orders to pick up for our Semiconductor customers throughout the year. In Display, we're still at the cyclical bottom, so we ought to see some improvement there as well. And I would expect AGS to be a little bit more ratable going forward. So I think those elements would drive you to have on order outlook that's in line with a stronger second half. And that's on top of, as you know, an environment where DRAM orders are just dropping significantly.

Your next question comes from C.J. Muse with Barclays Capital.

I guess if you look at Silicon coming in back-end loaded and then Service improving through the year and LCD at a cyclical trough and I guess uncertainty around EES, can we assume -- or can you help us here in terms of the operating margin? It would appear that we should see at least 200, 300 bps of improvement through the year. Is that the right way to think about it?

I think if you take a look at our published models for operating margin, that's consistent with that. And you would also expect to see that with a strong SSG second half.

And then I guess real quickly, as a follow-up, in terms of the variance and the $34 billion, $36 billion WFE guide, what would drive the uptick there? Would that be a resumption from DRAM? Or is that still more foundry and logic based?

I think it can be -- the biggest thing is, we said, was DRAM, because it's at such a low level. And whether it comes back in the second half of the year or the beginning of 2012, it makes me have more confidence in the length of this cycle. When you look at what memory is as a percent of WFE right now, it's around 30%. Back in '07, at the previous peak, it was 70%. So there's a lot of, now, and spending was roughly at the same levels, overall. So I think there's a lot of room to move in the memory area, but of course, we got to see a strong PC growth to warrant that. But I'm encouraged, because I expected prices to kind of -- DRAM prices to hit bottom around June, to hit bottom in January, starting to strengthen already. So I think that's a good omen for late-in-the-year investments in DRAM.

Your next question comes from Edwin Mok with Needham & Company. Edwin Mok - Needham & Company, LLC: First question on the Solar side. Can you remind us what's your lead time right now and remind us if your lead time is still pretty long? If that's the case, will you have some visibility in the back half?

Edwin, the lead time is still about four to six months for our equipment, and the factories are pretty much all full out. Edwin Mok - Needham & Company, LLC: With that kind of lead times, you should have restart focusing some of the stuff in the second half. Wouldn't that be the case?

That's part of it, and we have backlog today of about $1 billion in EES already. So you've got healthy backlog. And the things that we'll be shipping in Q2, we've been working on for a period of time already, and much of it's already secured by LC. So this is a -- it's a pretty straightforward market in terms of linking all those elements. Edwin Mok - Needham & Company, LLC: And just a quick follow-up on Display. You mentioned $250 million of revenue in new applications. Is that on top of the 30% capital spending decline that you expect for the industry? And are those mostly come from PC? Or did some of that come from PVD?

Yes, that's on top of the 30% decline. Now we're trying to separate the TV market from the new applications market. It's web coaters primarily.

Your next question comes from Patrick Ho with Stifel, Nicolaus. Patrick Ho - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: First off, in terms of your last comment about the solar capacity that you have been in-house being, I guess, all full out right now, how much do you believe you need to add to your own internal capacity to meet both existing as well as the future demand?

I think we feel good about where the capacity is today. I mean, if we can meet this quarter, I think that will be a good stress test. And so we're confident we can support the quarter, and we'll just see how the second half of the year plays out.

And our teams have been very good at quickly adjusting capacity. If you think back to the first part of 2010, we were delivering 1/3 of these volumes. So the team has responded very, very quickly, so our supply chain here is pretty flexible. Patrick Ho - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: And I know you guys have talked about this in the past as a growing area for your Silicon Systems business on the advanced wafer-level packaging. And can you just describe where we are on that front and whether that's a driver for some of the share gains you're looking for in 2011?

It will be a small driver of share gains in 2011. We really expect production volumes in 2012. We have estimated 2012, it'd be about a $500 million market, much smaller than that in 2011, but we have very high share of the total.

Your next question comes from Jagadish Iyer with Arete Research.

First, I just wanted to find out on the trajectory of the Display margins, given that you have these two new product lines, which are going to be contributing about $250 million. So I just would like to know about the trajectory of the operating margins.

The OLED and touch panel equipment is, quite frankly, older-generation equipment for us. So it has and has been really outside of the commercial arena for a few years now. So it hasn't gone through the supply chain actions that we've taken on our core and active products that have improved the margins over time and really meet the Display model. As this market develops, we will do that, and the margins on this equipment will look a lot like the Display margins overall. So we'll talk at the March meeting. We'll go into the business models going forward, but it won't be a material change in the business model for Display.

Just a follow-up, Mike, on your thoughts on the NAND spending. Do you believe that it will continue to grow in 2012? And if so, if DRAM also comes back, do you think 2012 could be a blockbuster year for memory spending?

I'm not going to ask you to define blockbuster, but I do think NAND spending has to continue to increase. And part of this assumption, of course, is that NAND density and tablets is going to continue to go up double, essentially, year-on-year and then tablets will double again in 2012. So I think NAND spending has to continue to go up from here. DRAM has to come back. Whether that results in a blockbuster or not, I have no idea. But it's going to be positive -- the second half of the year and into 2012, I believe, will be very positive for memory.

Your next question comes from Gus Richard with Piper Jaffray.

George, just help me out as I model going forward. What's the range of gross margins -- understanding that there's a mix component to that, what would you expect that to be over the next year and a half?

Yes, I think you've seen the range. What we're seeing, for instance, in this quarter, while it was a flat, there was a lot going on. And if you look at the kinds of things that we're -- the potential mix effects as we get a recovery in Display, that helps lift our overall gross margins. But as we get a higher mix of Solar, it has lower gross margins than kind of our average margin as a company, even though, as you've seen, the operating performance was just outstanding this quarter. So a very strong Solar is a good story, but it will bring down our average gross margin a little bit. We don't see any fundamental change to the gross margin structure of our Semiconductor business. And AGS, which has struggled in the first couple of quarters of this year will improve in the second half. So I expect, overall, the second half will be a stronger gross margin period for the company. But any time you have a large load of Solar, that will dilute it a little bit. But again, the profitability there is far more attractive so...

So we can kind of think about 42% to 45% gross margin range sort of where you'll operate going forward?

Sure, I think that's a reasonable range. You can widen it out, or 41% to 45% is probably okay.

And then Mike, just looking at the PC market, I mean, it appears to me we're getting a shift to smartphones and tablets. That's a lot of high leading-edge low-marking silicon that probably drives a lot of consumption. What are you thinking about PC unit growth going forward this year? And where would it become a problem in terms of your thoughts of over $11 billion this year?

We're still thinking 10% or greater PC growth this year, driven a lot by emerging markets and corporate. And so I think that's still a pretty positive view about PCs, and I think it will drive more DRAM investment. Where could it get where it starts to have problems with our model? I can't really quite say, because I think the big part of the swing here is what would happen at Intel if the numbers went down dramatically. So I think they're pretty committed to their capacity expansion, and they have a pretty clear view of their market.

And Carrie, we have time for about two more questions please.

Your next question comes from Ben Pang with Caris & Company. Benedict Pang - Caris & Company: First, on the market share that you commented on for the SSG. I would have assumed that you guys would actually gain some share since a lot of the foundry applications are in these newer technology nodes. Am I misunderstanding what you guys are talking about in terms of the shift that's causing the market share slower momentum I guess?

Foundry is good. We put foundry and Logic together. It's good for Applied Materials. The modest headwind I talked about was just the drop-off in DRAM and rise in NAND. There's a lot of shifting around. As I said, I don't want to make too big of a deal out of that. But when we talk about market share, we're talking about market share in overall WFE for a 300-millimeter WFE not just in our SAM. In our specific product groups, we will obviously gain more, because we address only about half the overall TAM in the market. Benedict Pang - Caris & Company: And a bigger picture question, when you think about DRAM capital intensity, you commented on some prior historic low values and high values for capital intensity. In general, does the amount of on-chip memory now kind of change those capital intensity historical -- the way we'd look at it historically?

You want to repeat the last part of that question? Benedict Pang - Caris & Company: Well, now that Intel has so much memory on it's own chip, right? How do we actually think about the way that memory -- the way that that Logic actually drives memory spending? Can we actually compare it to like 1995?

Well, it's really about addressable memory in a PC, and so that's kind of gone over the last five years from 2 gigabytes per PC to -- we actually saw a drop-off last year as prices went up, and now it seems to be trending up to almost 4 gigabytes per PC. We expect 3.9 gigabytes per PC in '11, up from about 3 gigabytes in 2010. So how that DRAM is attached hasn't really changed in PC architecture in recent times.

Your next question comes from Krish Sankar with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

George, what percentage of AGS is attributed to SSG sales?

SSG for AGS is 80-plus percent of their overall. I mean, the Semiconductor related for AGS. Is that your question?

Yes, exactly.

80-plus percent.

Mike, in the past, you have spoken about a whole new like roughly, like $60 billion spend for all the new fabs that are coming online now over the next 12 to 18 months. Where do you think beyond that -- like how much is being spent? And how much more is there to go?

Well, we keep updating this chart. Now we're tracking 18 fabs. And over the next eight to 12 quarters, I think we're estimating that there's $80 billion of potential spend there. So some has come off. Some have come on. The net-net has increased quite dramatically. I don't have the exact puts and takes in front of me, but I think that's close to the net-net.

And then Carrie, do we have a last question please.

Your last question comes from Satya Kumar with Credit Suisse.

This is Farhan calling in for Satya. My question is on your edge market share. Can you talk about like your edge? And especially like your new product, how's the traction with that? And how do you see it going into 2011 and 2012?

Sure. So if we take a step back, last year, we believe our edge share was up about four points. A lot of that was in memory, where silicon edge in particular is increasingly favorable for us with varied word lines and debt lines. That's really a quite positive aspect for us. We've been gaining share in both NAND and foundry. Recently, we talked about our new platform, but are really trying to focus in on patterning and edging hardmask and helping with the double patterning definition. These things, this year, since I think is -- you know that we have some headwind this year with the foundry spending higher, DRAM spending lower, and we don't have that share at Intel. We believe that the gains that we're going to make will allow us to hold flat share in '11. So as memory spending comes back, we think it will be very positive for us. And inside of that, our intrinsic application share is growing.

Just one more question on capital intensity for foundries. The foundry spending is up quite significantly, and I just want to see what your views are on CapEx. Do you see that the increasing complexity is increasing the CapEx for you?

I do. I think that what's happening right now as I look at trying to develop the 28- and the 22-nanometer technologies, the capital per wafer start is going up quite dramatically. I think it will be very close to the Logic capital per wafer start at those nodes. In the past, foundries have had a pretty very significant advantage on capital per wafer start. We see that going away as the high-k/metal gate approaches, and the processes just get a lot more complex. So we're certainly seeing that this year and capital spending per dollar of revenue, and we think that's going to continue in the advanced nodes.

And we'd like to thank everyone for joining us on the call this afternoon. A replay of this call will be available on our website beginning at 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time today. We hope to see many of you at our Analyst Meeting next month, and we'd like to thank you for your continued interest in Applied Materials.

This concludes today's conference. You may now disconnect.