Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to your Pacific Ethanol Fourth Quarter Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Ms. Becky Herrick. Ma'am, you may begin.

Thank you, operator. And thank you, everyone, for joining us today for the Pacific Ethanol Fourth Quarter and Year End 2011 Financial Results Conference Call. On the call today are Neil Koehler, President and CEO; and Bryon McGregor, CFO. Neil will begin with a review of business highlights, and then Bryon will provide details on the company's quarterly and annual financial and operating results. Then, Neil will return to discuss Pacific Ethanol's vision and open the call for questions. Before we get underway, let me first inform you that Pacific Ethanol issued a press release this afternoon that provides details of the company's quarterly and annual financial and operating results. The company also prepared a presentation for today's conference call available for download on the company's website at www.pacificethanol.net. If you have any questions, please call LHA at (415) 433-3777. A telephone replay of today's call will be available until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, February 29, 2012, the details for which are included in today's press release. A webcast replay will also be available at Pacific Ethanol's website. Please note, information in this call speaks only as of the today, February 27, 2012, and you are therefore advised that time-sensitive information may no longer be accurate as of the time of any replay. Before we begin, I will review a short Safe Harbor statement. Management's comments today will contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Information about the potential factors that could affect the company's financial results is available in the company's risk factors as updated in the company's SEC filings. With the exception of historical information, the matters discussed in this conference call, including without limitation, the ability of Pacific Ethanol to continue with the leading marketer and producer of…

Thank you, Becky. And thank you all for joining us today on the call. 2011 was a year of accomplishment for Pacific Ethanol, demonstrated by a 174% growth in annual net sales, a strong gross profit of $19.4 million and growth of 56% in total gallons sold compared to 2010. Adjusted EBITDA also improved significantly from a negative $10.1 million in 2010 to a positive $5.3 million in 2011. With 3 of the 4 Pacific Ethanol plants running at capacity and improved average margins, we generated strong operating income during the year and delivered net income to common shareholders of $1.8 million. For the fourth quarter of 2011, net sales grew 80% and total gallons sold grew 53% compared to the fourth quarter of 2010. Both production and third-party gallons sold increased, as well as the average sales price per gallon. When compared to last year, we significantly grew gross profit and operating income. In December of 2011, the industry was impacted by a drop in domestic gasoline and ethanol demand, coupled with record-high ethanol production rates, which resulted in a significant and historic decline in ethanol prices as compared to November. The market dynamics in December negatively impacted our business, substantially reducing production margins and exposing our marketing business to high price volatility over only a few weeks' time. While this presented an end-of-the-year challenge for 2011, we believe the margin environment, as well as gasoline and ethanol demand will improve during the first and second quarters of 2012 as the seasonal swings, typical of the industry, do affect pricing. Further and for the longer-term view, underlying supply and demand is generally well balanced on an annualized basis and will support positive industry-wide performance. Looking back at the full year, many of the strategic events of 2011 further solidified…

Thank you, Neil. For the fourth quarter of 2011, we reported net sales of $241.8 million, which compares to $134.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2010. The increase in net sales was primarily driven by operations at the Stockton plant, which was idled during the fourth quarter of 2010. In addition, our average sales price per gallon increased 20% over the same period. Total gallons sold increased 53% to 116.3 million gallons in the fourth quarter of 2011 compared to 76 million gallons in the prior year's quarter. However, total gallons sold were down 5% sequentially from the third quarter of 2011. This decline is mostly from fewer third-party gallons sold due to reduced demand in December. Gross profit from the fourth quarter of 2011 was $7.4 million compared to $1 million for the fourth quarter of 2010. The increasing gross profit was attributable to both an overall improved commodity margin environment in the early part of the fourth quarter of 2011 and the contribution from the Stockton plant operating in 2011. SG&A expenses, including professional fees, totaled $3.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, compared to $3.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2010. Operating income for the fourth quarter of 2011 was $3.7 million compared to a loss of $3 million for the same period in 2010. During the fourth quarter of 2011, we recorded aggregate noncash gains of $600,000 for the quarterly fair value adjustments on our convertible notes and warrants. Net loss available to common stockholders for the fourth quarter of 2011 totaled $2.4 million or $0.03 per share compared to a net loss of $12.1 million or $1 per share for the fourth quarter of 2010. Adjusted EBITDA, which excludes the fair value adjustments, was a negative $300,000 for the fourth quarter of…

Thanks, Bryon. As I mentioned earlier, the price of ethanol continues to trade at a very significant discount to the price of gasoline, which establishes ethanol as the cheapest form of transportation fuel available and increases the economic incentive to boost ethanol blend levels. The national Renewable Fuel Standard also drives demand for ethanol production, by requiring increasing amounts of renewable fuels in the gasoline supply through 2022, firmly supporting ethanol as an important and rapidly growing fuel source. We believe the national Renewable Fuel Standard is the only meaningful long-term national security measure in place to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, as it ensures that an increasing amount of the nation's fuel supply is produced within the United States. Refiners today are blending below the levels mandated, and consistent with cyclical trends, it will need to increase blend levels for the remainder of the year to be in compliance with the 2012 blending requirements. In addition, the EPA recently certified E15. While there is a step or 2 more in the process, we are encouraged by the progress in bringing E15 to the marketplace in 2012 as it will incrementally increase ethanol demand. As ethanol prices continue to trade at a discount to gasoline prices, higher ethanol blends such as E15 become more attractive, increasing the value proposition for purchasing ethanol and helping to moderate gasoline prices at the pump for the consumer. We believe 2011 was an illustration of the power of our business model. We successfully built our market share in the Western United States, further diversified our revenue streams, increased our ownership interest in the Pacific Ethanol plants and diligently managed cost to position us for profitable growth. As I stated earlier, our objectives in 2012 are to further expand our revenue streams in production, asset management and marketing, implementing more cost-competitive plant debt structure, increase ownership interest in the Pacific Ethanol plants to further benefit from these valuable assets and to return the Pacific Ethanol Madera plant to full production. We believe that strategic actions undertaken in 2011 lay a very strong foundation for our future success, and our execution on our 2012 objective will further solidify our position as the leading marketer and producer of low carbon renewable fuels in the Western United States. With that I'd like to open the call for questions. Cy, please begin the Q&A session.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Paul Resnik from Resnik Asset Management.

Considering what's going on in the ethanol market, a credible quarter. California is kind of an interesting state in a couple of ways when it comes to ethanol. I was wondering, a couple of questions here, whether you are in line or have received any support payments based on the laws in California that kind of provided a back-up profitability.

Paul, I think you're referring to the CEPIP, the California Producer Incentive Program. That program does still exist. It has not been funded for 2012. We did receive $2 million of payments last year from the start-up of the Stockton facility on that program. Given the current budgetary climate in California, it has not been re-upped, but it could be in the future, and we're certainly looking that -- on that, and I think the current margin environment shows that the benefit of that program to support new production and ties us into driving down the carbon intensity even lower at our facilities by receiving those payments, and we continue to believe it's a very solid program and hope that it does get refunded. But today, it's not funded.

And with regard to the CARB regulations as far as -- where do they stand? I know there's a hearing news and reviews and what-have-you.

Yes, so the Low Carbon Fuel Standard, which was challenged in a court of law and a federal judge deemed on a initial ruling for the Low Carbon Fuel Standard to be unconstitutional on the basis of the dormant Commerce Clause. That ruling has been appealed by the state of California. It is business as usual. The refiners continue to implement their obligations under that program, even though there has been an injunction that was also granted by the same federal judge. CARB has also appealed the district court in San Francisco for a stay of that injunction, and we should know in a couple of weeks whether they're successful. There is uncertainty around that program. Our general view is that the Low Carbon Fuel Standard is a very important program for the state of California. There's a lot at stake as it relates to their overall climate change initiatives, and frankly, their whole framework of fuel regulations. And they will work very hard to maintain the integrity of that program even if it means reworking the regulations in such a way that they can address the legal concerns. So it is business as usual today. There is some risk around the legal process, but we continue to receive a premium for the ethanol gallons that we produce in California and elsewhere that have a very low carbon score and believe that we will continue to benefit.

A few more questions. I'll be real quick here. First, generally in the industry, and I think you alluded to it, there is an effort to bring down the overhang of ethanol supply. There's been some cutback in production. So can we expect first quarter production at your plants to be below fourth quarter?

That is quite possible. We have slowed down the plants to be responsive to the supply-demand imbalance, others in the industry are doing so as well. We have seen 05-plus percent reduction in overall industry production. We have slowed our plants down a bit more than that, and we just look at the overall supply-demand in January and early February and saw that the industry was producing 15-plus percent more product than the market was demanding. That was really an overhang from some fairly peak margins and record-high production levels at the -- in the fourth quarter. So yes, you can expect that our production, based on the progress to date, in Q1 will be a bit less than the fourth quarter.

And then 2 questions about timing. Corn oil production, roughly what's your timeline on introducing corn oil production at your plants?

We have not finalized all of that from scoping out exactly how we would do it and the financing around that, but our expectation that we will be rolling that out in 2012, at least at one of our facilities, if not more.

Okay. And I guess that-- oh yes, and lastly, E15, I think it's very crucial to roll that out in order to really get the production -- get the use up to the standard. What's your sense of how quickly that's going to be rolled out?

Well, we couldn't agree with you more, Paul, and we think that the fact that we have cleared virtually all of the hurdles from allowing blenders to start rolling out E15, and given the fact that today ethanol, and without it's tax incentive having expired at the end of the year, is still trading at about $1 a gallon less than gasoline. That offers a very compelling opportunity for E15 to be introduced. We have a -- probably just a number of weeks, if not a month or so, of final regulatory work. And then, it's a matter of producers signing up and blenders signing up to engage in E15 blending. We do expect that in the second half of 2012, we will see modest, yet meaningful, amounts of E15. Could be upwards of 200 million gallons of ethanol used in that application with a lot more in the years out from there. Certainly, what you see is that when somebody introduces E15 and has lowered the cost of their fuel quite considerably by doing so, that becomes a real competitive incentive for the competitors across the street to do the same. And just as we saw when E10 was rolled out, there was -- it snowballed quite quickly when the economics were as clear as they are today. So it is very important part of implementing the Renewable Fuel Standard E15 and continued support from export markets given ethanol's and U.S. ethanol's, in particular, very competitive price on world markets we think will tighten the supply-demand balance given the discipline we're seeing on the production side will meet both the Renewable Fuel Standard and continue to have a strong foundation for margin growth in the business.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Ian Gilson from Zacks Investment.

In the fourth quarter, basically your production declined versus the third quarter was all in third-party sales, basically in the sense that you produced internally 38 million gallons in third quarter, 37.8 million in the fourth quarter and that's pleasant enough to flat. Was this a conscious decision? Or why was that decline -- why did that decline occur? And as we look into the current year, will the variability in sales be on the third-party side or on your production side?

Well, you can see some variability on both sides. What we have seen over the last few years is that we've continued to expand all aspects of the business and that continues to be our objective. What happened in the fourth quarter was that gasoline demand was off rate significantly. And harking back to Paul's question on the E15, we are pretty much captive to gasoline demand at 10%, with gasoline demand off paying even more than its typical of winter season and having the nature of our contracts where we meet 100% of many of our customer's needs. Our individual contract sales went down with those gasoline sales. Given that the market was also getting a bit long on product, there was some pricing that we consciously chose not to chase and want to focus more on making sure that what we do sell is done in a profitable manner. So principally, it was due to the gasoline demand, which does decline at this time of year, and we expect our sales on both the production side and the third party to grow back as we see gasoline demand recover, and also, as we start introducing E15 and look at other new market's opportunities for us. We expected to see continued expansion. But yes, there will be some variability along with the market dynamics.

Okay. Now is the current blend rate below the current mandated level or below the level mandated for the full year?

Well, if you annualize so far in 2012 the amount of ethanol that is being blended, it is at a rate that is less than the minimum 13.2 billion gallons, been more like a little better than 12 billion gallon rate. Already in the last week or 2, we're starting to see gasoline demand pick up and the ethanol blend -- the amount of ethanol blended with that gasoline accordingly. So we will see more blending as the year goes on and gasoline demand recovers and E15 is blended. But the point is that refiners, to meet that requirement, will have a compelling reason to blend more ethanol than they are today.

But on the numbers I look at, if gasoline consumption is less than 5% increase '12 over to '11, the amount of gasoline required is still not enough, even E15, to pull the mandated ethanol production level.

We -- our view on the numbers is that there was about 137 billion gallons of gasoline sold in the United States in 2011. That number arguably could be actually less than 2012, even if it were 13.4 -- I mean, 134 billion, 135 billion. That still supports that 10% blend of 13.4 billion to 13.5 billion with the minimum mandated requirement, 13.2 billion. Most of the areas are now plumbed for E10, not all. And that is why we think that E15 is important, but it's really more important as we move into 2013 because at that point, with another 600 million gallons of minimum mandated demand and an expectation that we might see flat or possibly even further declines in overall gasoline use, we will need those higher level blends to meet those requirements.

Thank you. I'm showing no further questions at this time. I would like to hand the conference over to Mr. Neil Koehler for any closing remarks.

Thank you all for joining us today. We very much appreciate your support and look forward to giving you an update on our first quarter earnings in a couple of months. Thank you and have a good day.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This concludes our program. You may all disconnect and have a wonderful day.