Sure. Jamie I appreciate the questions. First on supply chain to be clear, unfortunately, I think we were - our expectations were met, given our Q2 call comments. And I think it's - having said that I would say again, credit the team at Allison as well as our partners, customers and suppliers. This is a tremendous amount of effort behind the scenes. And I'm not sure everybody fully appreciates that. But I will tell you, it's not for lack of effort, and that's through multiple tiers of the supply chain. And it's a daily process, frankly. Nevertheless, as we see things today, as I believe we mentioned on the Q2 call, we did expect some improvement in at least Allison's specific issues. For the most part that's occurred. I would certainly describe us as well positioned to meet demand. I'd argue we're demand constrained at this point. With that in mind we're only as good as what we know right today. And I think it continues to be a very fluid situation. And I'm certainly aware of public reporting, that you're aware of that there are muted expectations for the balance of certainly this year. I would also note when you think about what's possible, given the amount of working days that's left with building rates, et cetera, it's very challenged and I think we mentioned that on Q2 as well. So with all of that in mind, we're certainly looking forward to '22 for better conditions. But again, keep in mind that there's a number of activities that are going to need to occur, a number of constraints that are going to need to be resolved. I will tell you the level of engagement that we have right now solving problems through multiple levels or challenges, making some strategic investments, as well to brake constraints it's all underway. But that, of course, assumes that labor is going to be available in a timely way that logistics there's a lot of assumptions that go into that. So the takeaway from all that is we're working as hard as we can to certainly be in a position to meet customer demand. And I would describe us again as demand constrained. Your comment in terms of question around outgrowing the markets if we just take the six end markets that certainly we report, North America On-Highway as we talked about, we're excited about the 3414 regional haul series being fully available in the marketplace through at least the major OEMs. That target market is plus or minus 30% plus of the day tractor, day cab market right as you think about it, so significant opportunity for us with very low penetration today. We continue to be well positioned in Class 8 vocational. We've gained shares over the year as you know despite I think certain alternative technologies that are out there that was speculated to be much more applicable in the heavy - heavier, more demanding duty cycles that's not happened. So the team continues to grow, certainly share there. We're pleased with our positioning in Class 4, 5 with the Navistar and GM releases that those products are doing well in the marketplace. As we go to the outside North America, On-Highway market, as we talked about on the virtual Technology Day running through very low penetration and at least the larger core markets that being China as well as parts of Asia at this point. We see more opportunity to grow there. We already have significant share in certain niche, smaller sub segments of the market that are very similar to what you've seen in Europe and North America. We're also looking at our Off-Highway market, outside of North America in terms of mining and construction applications and new products in terms of the TerraTran release. I think we're doing very well there with the team. It's received, I think very good uptake from the market. That's a sizable opportunity as we look at that particular market. And again, just growing in core locations, very similar and aligned to North American and Europe. Defense, multitude of programs going on there, as we've talked about defense as an asset light business, typically longer to get programs launched, but very long lives in terms of platforms. So the Abrams has been around since the late 70s, early 80s, and continues to be modified. Having - with that in mind, we're also behind both the OEMs competing for the NPF. In terms of sizing those the NPF market, as you think about that, what does that start to look like longer term. The OMFV is a platform that we're certainly exposed through the team working with American Rheinmetall. That's about a 4000 units, potential market over a number of years. We're also on the M88 platform, which is a heavy duty recovery platform with BAE. So you start that those are very significant long running platforms. And then of course, the work that the team is doing outside of North America. The service support equipment in other market for us. The team continues to grow our franchise there in a number of different regions, and also benefiting from some of the growth that we're seeing in our defense business as well. So the team has done I think, a very good job there as well. So when you start to put it all together, I think it's a strong story, which frankly, explains why we are investing the way we are. Fred mentioned it earlier about very pointed programs from us to grow this business. And I think when you look at it, whether it's a limited amount of clean sheet design, so to speak, but mostly variants, we've been very successful, leveraging those with attractive returns and incremental investment. So hopefully that covers the waterfront a bit for you.