Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to AGCO 2020 Third Quarter Earnings Release Conference Call [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to hand the conference over to Mr. Greg Peterson, AGCO Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thanks, Nicole, and good morning to everyone and thanks for joining us on the call today. This morning, we'll refer to a slide presentation that's posted on our Web site at www.agcocorp.com. The non-GAAP measures used in the slide presentation are reconciled to GAAP measures in the appendix of that presentation. We will make forward-looking statements this morning, including demand, product development and capital expenditure plans and the timing of those plans, acquisition, expansion and modernization plans and our expectations with respect to the costs and benefits of those plans and timing of those benefits. We'll also discuss price levels, earnings, cash flow, tax rates and other financial metrics. And we do wish to caution that these statements are predictions and that actual results may differ materially. We refer you to the periodic reports that we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, and the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020. These documents discuss important factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those contained in our forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, adverse developments in the agricultural industry, including those resulting from COVID-19, including plant closings, workforce availability, supply chain disruption and product demand, weather, commodity prices and changes in product demand. We disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as required by law. We'll have a replay later today on our corporate Web site. On the call with me this morning are Martin Richenhagen, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; Eric Hansotia, our Chief Operating Officer; and our future Chairman and CEO starting in 2021; and Andy Beck, our Chief Financial Officer. And with that, Eric, please go ahead.

Very good. Thank you, Greg, and good morning. We appreciate your interest in AGCO and your participation on the call today. We'll start on Slide 3 that provides the financial summary. Our third quarter results demonstrated solid execution as we manage a difficult supply chain, ramped up production in Europe and Brazil and delivered a robust sales and income growth across all four regions. Because of the COVID related factory shutdowns in the second quarter, we started the third quarter with a significant backlog. Our third quarter production output was higher-than-anticipated, which enables us to increase sales by approximately 20% in the quarter. Our strong sales also contributed to our inventory reduction goals, resulting in inventories being down $220 million lower than compared to September 2019, both on a constant currency basis. In addition, despite the increased quarter three delivery performance, our order board remains solid heading into the fourth quarter. This exceptional operating performance translated into 390 basis points of adjusted margin improvement and third quarter adjusted earnings per share of $2.09. The focus on working capital resulted in strong free cash flow in the third quarter and puts us in a very good position from a liquidity perspective. Strong customer response to our improved product lineup is also showing up in our retail sales performance in 2020 and we plan to keep investing in new technology. Our solid financial position is enabling us to maintain our planned investments in premium technology, smart farming solutions and enhanced digital capabilities. Products like our smart planters, smart nozzle sprayers and connected premium tractor products are providing productivity enhancement options for our customers and new margin-rich sales opportunities for AGCO. On Slide 4, we detail the industry unit retail sales level by region for the first nine months of 2020. As the…

Thank you, Eric, for those very kind words, and good morning to those of you on the call with us this morning. This is my 64th earnings call and my last as AGCO's Chairman and CEO. Without getting too sentimental, let me just say that it's been my great pleasure and privilege to serve alongside my AGCO colleagues for the past 16 years. Their dedication, integrity, spirit and commitment to our customers are what make AGCO such an extraordinary company. And I'm proud to have been part of its history and proud of our culture. I also want to thank you and thank our investors and analysts for your support. It has been an honor to represent and guide AGCO to what it is today. I have tremendous confidence in AGCO -- yes, in Eric and Andy and our great team, and believe that AGCO's best days are yet to come. Now let's focus on the great third quarter we had, and Andy, please go ahead. Stay healthy, guys.

Thank you, Martin, and good morning to everyone. I'd also like to thank you, Martin, for your great leadership over the past 16 years. It's truly been an honor to work with you and to be part of your team during such an important period in AGCO's history. Now let's go back to the quarter. I'm going to start on Slide 7, which looks at AGCO's regional net sales performance for the third quarter and first nine months of 2020. AGCO's net sales were up about 20% compared to the third quarter of 2019, excluding the negative impact of currency translation. The Europe/Middle East segment reported an increase in net sales of approximately 19%, excluding positive impact of currency compared to the third quarter of 2019. Sales growth was driven primarily by higher rates of production in our European facilities as they recovered from the COVID shutdown, especially at our Valtra plant, which has shifted its maintenance work into the second quarter to avoid its normal July shutdown. Growth occurred across most of the European markets with most significant increases in Germany. Net sales in North America increased approximately 9%, excluding unfavorable currency translation compared to the levels experienced in the third quarter of 2019. Increased sales of high horsepower tractors, replacement parts and precision planting equipment accounted for most of the growth. AGCO's third quarter net sales in South America increased approximately 48% compared to the third quarter of 2019, excluding negative currency translation impacts. Mid-range and high horsepower tractors as well as our new Momentum planters produced most of the increase. Sales growth was significant in Brazil and Argentina. Net sales in our Asia, Pacific, Africa segment increased about 21% in the third quarter of 2020 compared to 2019. Excluding the negative impacts of currency translation, strong growth…

And before we take your questions, we wanted to give you a scheduling update for our annual analyst meeting that we traditionally host in December. We're currently targeting early March for that meeting, and we'll be sending out a save the date in the next few weeks. So now as we turn to the Q&A section and to broaden the participation during this session, we'll ask that you limit yourselves to one question each. And so Nicole, we're ready to take questions.

[Operator Instructions] The first question will come from the line of Ross Gilardi with Bank of America.

I'd love to just get your perspective on the Americas and I think you've had three straight quarters now at double-digit margins in North America and you got back to six and South America was the best in a very long time. Have we turned the corner? And do you think a low double digit margin for North America in sort of mid single digit for South America is kind of indicative of what's normalized through the cycle as we model forward over the next few years, assuming no completely crazy things happen in the world?

Ross, we have gone through some really seasonally strong orders in North America and seen a lot of improvement in South America, as you pointed out. In North America, the fourth quarter is not as seasonally strong for us from a mix standpoint. And so those margins will come down in the fourth quarter. So we're not going to be at that double-digit level at the end of the year. However, obviously, that's our target. That's where we want to get to and with some improvement in volumes from the market and what we're doing with our growth in high horsepower equipment and trying to grow our business in North America through precision planting and our grand protein business recovering, we think that's a very attainable target. In terms of South America, again, the fourth quarter is not as seasonally strong of a quarter for us. The revenue is down and the mix isn't as strong. So we'll see those margins come down for the full year but we'll be solidly in the profits for the full year. And that was our goal getting into this year was to turn that business around and be profitable again. And we've got a lot of work to do there. But again, our goal is to get back up to corporate averages in terms of our margins. It's going to take us some time. But with our work in terms of our cost reduction and the growth we're seeing in the market that will certainly help us.

And then just as a follow-up, can you just comment a little bit more on the retail sell-through of your new products and Fendt and IDEAL really in North America, in South America? And were your margins in the Americas heavily influenced at all from just pipeline fill of a lot of those new products into the region?

I think to answer your last question first, I wouldn't say there was any unusual activity. Now in North America, one of the reasons we did better than we thought we were going to do this quarter was we were a little cautious on how quickly we could ramp up production, particularly in our European plants and get the products all the way over to North America and to get those into our dealers and our customers' hands. And so we were actually ahead of schedule there. So we did get to invoice out to customers more of our high horsepower products in the third quarter than we expected. So the mix was strong in the third quarter because of that. And so we'll see a little bit of an offset with the fourth quarter because we're ahead of schedule there. In terms of our retail performance of our new products, it's going quite well. Our high horsepower tractor sales are up over 20% in North America and our IDEAL combined sales are going to be up. I think they're up about 50% globally from where we were a year ago. So making progress in both areas and that is contributing to our stronger results, particularly the high horsepower growth in North America.

The next question will come from the line of Ann Duignan with JPMorgan.

Martin, I know Eric said that you'd left a lasting impact on AGCO, but I think you've left a lasting impact on all of us. So we're going to miss your sense of humor, for sure. Eric, my question of you is more on the North America market, both on the tractor, combine side or high horsepower side, as well as on the grain storage side. Can you talk about the fact that farmers have gotten upwards of $70 billion over the last two years on government payments? We would have expected demand to have been much stronger going into the end of the year on the back of the windfalls that they have received and maybe into early next year? And then on grain storage, are you seeing any pickup in demand or orders for replacement storage given the huge storms we had, particularly in Iowa earlier in the year? Thank you.

I think there's probably two dynamics that are laying on top of one another. One is the numbers that you see in terms of government subsidies and those are strong for sure. But if you just think back over the last six months, there's been about as high of uncertainty environment as you could imagine, even with the government payments about when they were going to trigger and how they're going to trigger and so on. And commodity prices were low. So I think the farmers have still had a dose of caution working through the course of the year. The combination now of both strong government payments and renewed strength in the commodity prices is bringing confidence back into the market. And we're seeing that in our order boards, that's why we spoke to even though we've built a lot, we're continuing to see strong order boards, and we're working our inventory down. So North America market is doing quite well, same thing. You also asked grain solutions. There is a lot of disruption to grain storage sites, especially in the Midwest with the straight-line wins that happened there. And so there's been a fair bit of ordering to replace those bins, both commercially and on farm. But overall, that was one of the items that was on hold during the period of uncertainty. But we're seeing more recent recovery in that market.

The next question will come from the line of Jamie Cook with Credit Suisse.

And same, Martin, congratulations on a great job. And like Ann said, I as well always appreciated your sense of humor as well as leadership. So I guess, just going back to the margin question again, Andy, Eric or Martin, to see North American margins approaching sort of the double-digit range for three quarters, historically, AIM would have been the only region that had double digit margins. So I'm just trying to understand, just given where your market share in North America is relative to AIM, like, why those margins are there already, is it just sort of precision planting. And structurally can those margins become closer over time and what needs to happen to get them there over the long term? Thank you.

I think the North American market, we're showing good progress there in terms of profitability and our presence in some of these markets like high horsepower equipment. And I think that's what's the big driver for us is if we can grow in the high horsepower sector, that will give us -- that's where the higher margin products are. And you've already pointed out the contributions that we're getting from our precision planting business and also our grain and protein business have all contributed to this. So all those are high margin product ranges that certainly help our mix in North America. And as we can grow and gain scale, I think that's a big part of the equation to get the margins up further in our North America region.

The next question will come from the line of Seth Weber with RBC Capital Markets.

Maybe just a clarification then the question. Can you just clarify, in North America, whether you'll be producing, expect to be producing to retail demand next year? And then just weaving that in can you just, with all the product introductions and precision planning and whatnot. Can you just talk to your incremental margin framework by region that you're expecting into a recovery scenario? Thanks.

So we have talked a good bit this year about being really focused on our working capital, and we've made progress as you can see from our cash flow statement so far this year. We do plan to reduce dealer inventories further in the fourth quarter, particularly in North America and Western Europe. So that will impact both of those regions in terms of year-over-year sales growth, in terms of incremental margins then now that -- particularly after we get beyond the fourth quarter. But I'd say kind of as we look into next year, we've said that historically we would expect incremental margins ranging probably from the low 20s to the upper 20s or low 30s, depending on the region. So typically, we'd expect our European margins to be at the upper end of that range. So high 20s, potentially low 30s. North America, we would expect to be more kind of in the mid-20s with our South America incremental margins more in the lower 20s. So thanks, Seth. And Nicole, let's go ahead and take the next question.

The next question will come from the line of Jerry Revich with Goldman Sachs.

And Martin and Eric, congratulations. Can you talk about South America? Andy, you mentioned that there's still work to be done from a localization process. Can you just quantify that for us in terms of what proportion of your content is localized today and the opportunity set from here. As you heard from others based on the margin performance in the quarter, it feels like you got a lot down over the past couple of quarters but maybe you can quantify and expand on where you stand?

Jerry, our margin improvement in South America is really driven by a lot of factors. The growth that we're seeing gives us a little more leverage and scale over our cost structure and we're seeing, again, a strong growth in some of the higher margin products that we have down there, some of the complementary products like planters, sprayers, those have really helped us as well. Also, our grain and protein business, sales are up in South America. So there's a lot of reasons why we're seeing improvement. As it relates to the localization efforts and the margins on our core products, it's been a lot of work to still do there. The exchange rate weakening in Brazil has caused some further challenges on those margins. We've been adding some pricing to try to offset some of that. But it just shows that we still need some to get some more localization of the parts on some of those new products. So we're making some progress. But I would say that work still got at least another year, even maybe into two years to get to where we completely want to be. But we're making some progress.

And sorry, can you specify the number, just rough ballpark on where we stand in terms of localization versus target? Are we at 50%, 60%? Just a bit of context to quantify it…

So Jerry, to sell the products in South America, we have to be 60% local. So we're probably closer to 60% than we have been historically. Historically, we've probably been at 80% or 90% local. So we obviously have a ways to go to get back to where we want to be to kind of minimize that exchange impact that Andy was talking about.

The next question will come from the line of Larry De Maria with William Blair.

And of course, best wishes to Martin and good luck to the team. I guess we won't get to hear from Martin in December, which we always looked forward to. Curious on Europe, the fundamentals, as you described, are obviously reasonable. Wondering how much demand has maybe been pulled forward in Germany given the tax team there that that's going to be the hurdle to growth in the medium term? In other words, if we need other markets to come back to in Europe to balance the European outlook? And second part of that question is, if you could just discuss maybe fleet age and the need for replacement in the European market, kind of broadly? Thank you.

Larry, it's interesting, German market is one of the few markets in Europe that's up this year, and it was up year-to-date about 8% or one of the other markets are down. And so I do think there's evidence that those tax incentives, there was some VAT relief and also some accelerated depreciation incentives that were put in place, those incentives are helping the German market. So there's likely to be some pull forward because of that. But we're still obviously working and developing what we think the market is going to be like in 2021. But likely we like to see some recovery from some of the other markets to offset some of that pull forward in Germany, just as you described.

And then the other piece of your question was, where is the replacement demand cycle looking [Multiple Speakers]. We see the last - first of all, in general, that market is flatter, it's less volatile than some of the other markets. And so you don't have the big spikes up and you don't have the big spikes down. The last kind of localized high point was in 2017, '18 time period. And then there's been a bit of a softening since then. But what that tells you is the fleet is fairly fresh. We don't have the same kind of replacement gap or demand gap there that we've seen in South America and North America. It's not as acute in Europe.

The next question will come from the line of Chad Dillard with Bernstein.

So I just wanted to revisit the localization conversation in Brazil. I was just hoping you could provide just a roadmap to get from where you are at around 60% today to about 90% target. Just from a practical standpoint, what needs to happen? And can you just give us a framework for thinking about the time frame? And then just secondly on the GSI component. Can you -- is there a way you can quantify just how high orders are versus the prior year and how should we think about the lead time? Should we see this more materialize in 2021?

Maybe I'll take a stab at this and then Andy can jump in as well if there's something to add. But I want to make sure that you heard Andy's comments, I think, in the way he had intended them to be, or Greg's comments, that is that FINAME law requires roughly around 60% local content, and that's essentially where we are. Historically with some of our heritage products, we were up in the 70% to 80% range and that was because they had been designed locally. They weren't being -- there wasn't a design that was being brought in from another location and localized, it had been designed for the local market. So it was naturally utilizing local suppliers with the exception of just a few components that needed to be sourced from global suppliers. As we move to global platforms, we're taking global designs and then designing them once, building them in multiple locations. And so you'll see, on average, more of a localization effort versus designing unique products for each region. And that's what you're seeing in South America. We don't expect to take those products up to 90% as a strategy. We'll take them higher than they are today, maybe it will be 70%, maybe it’ll be 80%. But it won't be so intensely high because we want to maintain -- one of the benefits of global designs and global platforms is global volumes going through global suppliers. And so we want to maintain the advantage of both cost and quality that comes along with that. And as was mentioned earlier, it's probably a couple of years yet for us to extract all of the value out of the full localization of some of those tractor programs.

And then just a question on GSI. Just where is your order board today versus the year ago to quantify that? And how should we think about just the lead time for those orders to convert into revenue? Is it more like a 2021 event?

Our order board for grain and protein is up about 40% compared to where we were a year ago. It was a pretty low level a year ago. And I would say over half of that is really for 2021. So we're seeing a number of projects that are being deferred for whatever reason because of economic issues or availability of workforce to complete the project, number of issues. So our revenues are going to be down here in grain and protein this year because of the weak market conditions. And we do have, obviously, a better order board coming into 2021 because of these deferrals. And so we'll have to obviously take that into account when we figure out what our planning is for 2021, but at least we'll have a better order board entering into the year.

The next question will come from the line of Courtney Yakavonis with Morgan Stanley.

Maybe just first on a clarification. I think you mentioned that order boards are significantly higher than one year ago, but if you can just give us any more color by region? And then secondly, obviously, you talked about some of the seasonal mix impact on margins in the fourth quarter, but they are implying around flat year over year. Can you just give us any other color aside from mix, if there's any other items that we should be thinking about, especially as it relates to it, Eric, I think you said the Kansas production is coming out but you're not really taking in much other COVID disruption. So if you can just tell us especially what could be impacting the fourth quarter? Thanks.

To answer your second question first. The one thing that we would point out other than mix is that we are catching up a little bit on our engineering expenses in the fourth quarter. So we got a little behind in terms of what we expected in the second quarter, and we still have some projects and some work that we're trying to get done by the end of the year. So our engineering expense is going to be up, I think, about somewhere between $12 million to $14 million in the fourth quarter year-over-year. So that has a really sizable impact on our margins in the fourth quarter. In terms of the order board, the order boards are up, as we said, in almost all of our major markets. What happens with order boards is it's obviously a determination of our dealers' outlook in terms of where the markets are, but also they're [Technical Difficulty]…

Ladies and gentlemen, we are experiencing technical difficulty. Please remain on the line.

Sorry for that interruption. We were just -- maybe, Andy, you could probably reiterate what you were saying about the order board in terms of regionally?

Yes. Hopefully, we're not sure where we cut off, so we'll cover that again. In terms of our order board, they're up all over our major markets significantly higher. Order boards are a factor of, obviously, our dealers' anticipation of future retail sales, but they're also, the dealers also factor in availability of production slots. And so we think both of those are factors of why our order boards are higher than where we were a year ago. In North America, orders are up over 20%. In Europe, our orders are up over 50%. And in South America, we actually have a new basis of how we accumulate orders. We give dealers more incentives to give us much more forward-looking visibility of their orders and so our orders are over double where they were a year ago. So we have a good order board, gives us very good visibility for the balance of the fourth quarter.

The next question will come from the line of Nicole DeBlase with Deutsche Bank.

So I just wanted to ask a follow-up on your commentary around the dealer inventory progress you've made. Could you possibly characterize current levels of inventory globally? And I guess, maybe quantify the level under production that you expect in the fourth quarter in North America and Europe relative to what you did in the third quarter. And then last quick part of the conversation, do you guys still expect to produce in line with retail demand in 2021?

In terms of how our dealer inventory somewhat flows throughout the year, what happens is our low point on dealer inventories at the end of the year. And what we do is it builds seasonally in the first quarter and then kind of maintains that through the third quarter, and then we bring it back down in the fourth quarter. So we're always reducing dealer inventories in the fourth quarter. This year, we're going to reduce them more than we did last year. And so that will give us the effect of having lower dealer inventories at the end of the year. That's been our target all year. And as Greg discussed, that will impact our fourth quarter sales a little bit. Right now our dealer inventories in North America and Europe are probably about 5% below where they were a year ago at the end of September, and our target for the full year is somewhere between 5% and 10% for those markets. South America dealer inventories are substantially below where they were a year ago. And I think that's an industry-wide phenomenon. All the participants in South America have brought their dealer inventories down during 2020. And so what we're looking at is really relative to last year's reduction, reducing them a little bit more in order to create that impact. So what we've said is that impact to our sales this year from this work we've been doing is somewhere between 1% and 2% of our sales. And to answer your last question, for 2021, assuming we hit our dealer inventory targets this year then we think we're in a very good position and wouldn't likely plan for further reduction in 2021.

The next question will come from the line of Joel Tiss with BMO.

We've had a lot of good commentary. I wonder if there's any way you can give us a little bit of -- just some of the factors for 2021, obviously, not guidance. But you're coming in with lower inventories, it sounds like the mix is getting better from higher horsepower. Any impact from, like, GSI, I guess, would be positive for mix? And maybe incentive plans are kicking in? Anything you can help us with to just sort of frame the year very generally?

I mean, I can make some high-level comments. I would start off with saying, as we talked about with our farmers in the beginning of the call, there was a lot of uncertainty over the past months. We still see a tremendous amount of uncertainty over the coming months. We shared with you today on our call about the Heston facility. There's still potential with rates going up in Europe and North America for there to be challenges ahead that you can't exactly plan for right now. So that's kind of the background music playing, and we expect that could be here for another couple of quarters or so. Given that commodity prices are strengthening, confidence is strengthening, we have a situation where there's an older fleet in North America and South America those are both positive. And we've worked inventory down to target levels in most situations. So we think it's -- and like Andy said, our GSI, our grain and protein business, has been working really hard this year. It's just that some of those projects got deferred into next year. So we've captured -- we've got the orders but not the sales yet. So next year should be -- it should be a pretty solid year. But we don't want to give too much more guidance than that. Those are just the high level figures that we've talked about, or factors.

And then not to waste my second question. Can you give us a little sense in South America with kind of a new run rate of operating margins, again, with all the background noise, I understand. But structurally, do you feel like you're kind of climbing back to give this division a chance for double-digit operating margins again over the next two years or so?

Joel, I would say that, that's probably too aggressive. We're making progress and we want to continue to make progress, that's our goal with steady progress year-over-year. It's all dependent on a number of factors in terms of what the industry demand is and those kind of things. But our goal would be just to see continued steady progress on the margins and the profitability in South America.

The next question will come from the line of Adam Uhlman with Cleveland Research.

I guess my question overall is on capital allocation here. It sounds like the buyback is on pause through the rest of the year. Maybe, Eric, could you share in your appetite for acquisitions, maybe what does the acquisition pipeline look like today? And when could we expect to see share repurchase start to tick back up? Thanks.

So we are an active company at looking at acquisitions and we continue to do that. We've got our watch list of companies that we think would be a good fit for AGCO and we continue to cultivate that. But like is typical it's an opportunistic scenario where you just never know when the timing will be right for the seller to be ready to sell. We think the business could be a good fit. So we keep that actively going and that would be our top priority. If one of those target acquisition opportunities came available that's our first choice to be able to move quickly and be able to marry them up. We're very happy with the acquisitions we've made over the last few years, and they've been good contributors like we had intended them to be. Relative to share buybacks that's been a part of our history. We've put that on pause because of the uncertainty and I tie that back to the discussion when we talked about relative to uncertainty. We see this is going to be with us for some time yet and with a fair bit of volatility in terms of what could happen. So we're taking -- we're continuing our cautious stance for some period yet with the intention at some point, we'd return to share repurchases once the market stabilizes and is a little more predictable.

And we have time for one final question. Our final question will come from the line of Joe O'Dea with Vertical Research.

Martin, I'll add my congrats and best wishes moving forward. Eric, I just wanted to ask high level on Precision Ag. Any notable areas that you'd really call out as leadership positions for you or laggard areas for you that you're trying to narrow some of that and then also just how the 2021 launch pipeline in Precision Ag specifically compares to 2020?

So our intention is to be a full crop cycle provider of -- as a partner to our farmers. And so that means we want to have very strong planting, spring and harvesting solutions that, in each case, are be able to intelligently observe their environment, make onboard calculations to optimize their performance. And then when the farmer wants to, we can put those machines in autopilot mode and the machine optimizes its own performance. So those are what we think of when we talk about Smart Solutions. Our smart planter sales are up significantly to the tune of about 300% from 2018 to 2020. Our smart sprayer nozzle -- smart nozzle sales are up about 185% since 2018. The total rows of planters that we sell has gone up 57% in the last two years, up 28% this year. So our focus on Precision Ag is strong and is continuing, and Andy mentioned harvesting before. So we're intending to continue to invest in this area heavily and continue to grow it because we think that's where we can add the most value to our farmers.

I will now hand the conference back for closing remarks.

Thank you, Nicole, and we want to thank everyone for participating this morning. We appreciate your interest in AGCO. And if you do have follow-up questions, feel free to e-mail me at greg.peterson@agcocorp.com. Thank you very much, and have an awesome day.

This does conclude today's conference call. We thank you for your participation and ask that you please disconnect your lines.