Good morning. My name is Tiffany, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the AGCO Corporation's 2012 Second Quarter Earnings Release Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Greg Peterson. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Tiffany. Good morning, and welcome to those of you joining us for our call and Internet playback of that call for AGCO second quarter earnings. We will refer to a slide presentation, which is posted on our website at www.agcocorp.com, and we'll also use some non-GAAP measures during our presentation this morning. And we've got those non-GAAP measures reconciled to GAAP measures in the last section of the presentation. We'll be making forward-looking statements this morning, including projections of earnings per share, sales, demand, government financing programs, market conditions, farm incomes and production, commodity prices, margins, currency translation, pricing increases, productivity, investments in product development, facilities and expanding markets, inventory and production models, acquisition impacts, completion of facility construction and upgrades, industry demand, general economic conditions, engineering efforts, depreciation, free cash flow, supplier issues and capital expenditures. We wish to caution you that these statements are predictions and that actual results may differ materially. We refer you to the periodic reports that we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. These documents discuss important factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those contained in our forward-looking statements. And finally, a replay of this call will be available on our corporate website. On the call with me this morning are Martin Richenhagen, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Andy Beck, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Now I'd like to turn the call over to Martin. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Greg, and good morning to everyone. AGCO posted another quarter of outstanding results with strong sales growth and record quarter earnings. We took advantage of healthy market conditions while executing against our important margin improvement initiatives and delivered second quarter sales growth of over 14% and gross margin expansion of 200 basis points compared to the second quarter of 2011. Both our Europe, Africa, Middle East and North American business delivered operating margins in excess of 12%, and our South American margins rebounded to 9%. North America posted operating margins of 10% in its core business for the second quarter, the best in over 10 years. Slide 3 summarizes our results for the second quarter and first half of 2012. In the second quarter, we reported sales close [ph] across all of our regions compared to the second quarter of 2011 on a constant currency basis. Adjusted earnings per share for the second quarter was $2.08 and reflected both strong execution and the benefit of higher production volumes. In the second half of 2012, we plan to increase our investments in new product development and facility and market expansion. AGCO forecast for tractor and combine production volumes for 2011 are illustrated on Slide 4. Second quarter 2012 production was up 5% compared to the second quarter of 2011. High-horsepower tractor and combine production was about flat with the second quarter of last year in North America and Europe, but production of lower-horsepower tractors were up. Production levels in our South American factories were modestly lower than the levels in the second quarter of 2011. In September, we expect to start our production in the new assembly facility at Schengen [ph] Marktoberdorf, Germany. The production schedule in Germany was more heavily weighted towards the first half of the year…

Thank you, Martin, and good morning to everyone. AGCO's regional net sales performance for the second quarter and first half of 2012 is outlined on Slide 6. Currency translation had a negative impact of about 11% on AGCO's consolidated net sales in the second quarter of 2012. Acquisitions added approximately 11% of sales in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. The Europe, Africa, Middle East segment reported a net sales increase of approximately 12%, excluding the impact of currency translation during the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011. Growth was highest in Germany, France, U.K. and Russia and was partially offset by sales declines in some of the Southern European markets. North American sales increased approximately 88%, excluding currency translation impacts during the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. Excluding acquisition impacts, the growth was approximately 45%. Increases in hay equipment sprayers and high-horsepower tractors produced most of the growth. AGCO's second quarter net sales in South America grew 9% from comparable 2011 levels, excluding currency. Acquisitions generated about half of the growth and higher sales in Brazil due to improved crop fundamentals were partially offset by declines in Argentina. Net sales in our Asia Pacific segment increased approximately 17% in the second quarter of 2012 compared to 2011, excluding the impact of currency translation and the benefit of acquisition. Sales growth in Australia and New Zealand produced most of the organic increase. Parts sales were $357 million for the second quarter of 2012, an increase of approximately 7% compared to the same period in 2011 excluding currency. Slide 7 details AGCO's sales and margin performance. AGCO's operating margins were up over 130 basis points in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Andy Kaplowitz of Barclays.

Could you talk a little bit more about your visibility in North America for the rest of the year? And particularly in high-horsepower tractors, what do you think the risk is of order cancellation? Have you seen any? And what do you think of the risk is going forward?

I think we have a very good visibility in all risk, and opportunities are included in the numbers we just discussed.

Okay. So -- and you're not really seeing anything so far. You're just kind of watching and learn.

Exactly.

Okay, that's helpful. And then could you talk about the incrementals in North America? They were very strong in the quarter, obviously. You talked a little bit about cost control. We know you're starting a new facility or you did start a new facility in North America. Is that all contributing to better performance in North America?

In North America, a number of factors influencing the results. Clearly, the GSI acquisition, which is our -- the performance is strongest seasonally in the second quarter, was a key driver of the improvement. But also underlying that, we mentioned that our operating margins, excluding GSI, would have been about 10%. And so we're seeing in the core business, great improvement as well. I think a lot of the factors there are the key increases in some of our most profitable products like high-horsepower tractors, sprayers and hay equipment were driving that improvement.

And just one more follow-up on that. Could I ask you about GSI in the context of -- I mean, you did $0.39 so far for the year. I know that 4Q is usually -- I mean, you talked about it maybe being dilutive. But $0.06 seems a bit conservative. Is it just because you're watching North America so closely? Or -- and how does the international strength offset that?

Yes. We're -- what we're seeing right now is some softness in the North America market. But we have been able to offset that with better-than-expected results in our international sales. So we've been very pleased with the growth that we have achieved there. As you said, what we see seasonally from GSI is the first half is much better than the second half, and the fourth quarter is dilutive. So we're comfortable with that $0.45 per share guidance that we're giving.

And we want to be conservative also.

Your next question comes from the line of Ann Duignan of JPMorgan. Ann P. Duignan - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: I appreciate the emphasis on the monitoring of the situation, given the drought for 2012. But Martin, could you talk a little bit about where you might anticipate the impact being for your business? I worry about GSI, given that it's both protein production and grain storage, neither of which are likely to be in very healthy conditions by the end of the year versus your livestock business on the tractor side. Which businesses are you monitoring most closely to get a sense of where the impact might be and how quickly it might show up?

Yes. One is, we are very sorry for the farmers who suffer from the drought. But as you can imagine with our footprint, this is such only a small portion of our business. Most of AGCO's customers benefit very much from the much higher commodity prices. And that's a very strong year because prices go up and on the other hand, also, input prices go down. So they will generate excellent profits this year. We are seeing some problems in rather smaller markets for us like Italy and Spain. This is where some of the local manufacturing companies like Landini and Sami [ph] might be hit, but we are -- they are pretty much in the sector of high-horsepower tractors. And in Europe, I think any problem one might think about in those part of Europe will be offset by a stronger growth in Russia and Eastern Europe. In the -- the situation in GSI, we very strongly monitor GSI, of course, because it's a new acquisition. And so we want to make sure that we understand the business. What we see is that the synergies in the international markets are much bigger than we would have expected. We have a lot of strong dealers in South America and in Europe and China and Eastern Europe, who are very interested in that business. And we see more growth in those part of the world, which offset basically the potential difficulties in the American corn belt. Ann P. Duignan - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: Could you just update us on your sugarcane harvester in Brazil? When will that product come to market? And should we anticipate some market share gains when you have both the tractors and combines for that segment?

That is actually the sugarcane business we own now and we sell. That's the -- yesterday, we sold some to Africa so that means we also here have the opportunity to globalize that business a little more, and you will see the full impact of the sugarcane harvester in 2013.

Your next question is from the line of Rob Wertheimer of Vertical Research Partners.

I just had a curious question on the strong high-horsepower tractors in the U.S. Is that specifically tied to a particular subregion or strategy or brand? Or can you sort of talk about how you made progress in that?

It's a combination -- first of all, it's our strategy. Because in our portfolio, we have the best-performing, high-horsepower tractor in the world. And this is the Fendt brand, if you connect it with the brand. We basically -- the Fendt tractor, in a way, is maybe a little bit too high tech for the average American farmer. And therefore, we decided to take the most important elements, which are -- which is basically the dry strength, the transmission and the rear axle and in many cases, also our diesel engine into the Challenger brand of tractors. The Challenger is the brand, which is exclusive to our Caterpillar distribution network. And we see those big Cat dealers getting traction, investing money and focusing in this very segment. So the advantage of our tractors is they're very performing. They're very productive. They have very low cost of operating per hour, per acre. Fuel consumption is much lower than what you see typically from competitors. And our tractors have the lowest cost of ownership, all considered.

Okay, that's helfpul. And then one follow-up, you mentioned and I think...

It worked almost like a commercial, wasn't it?

It was pretty good. So you mentioned, Martin, the drought, even though it's tough on a lot of farmers, can be good on others. I assume that's mostly Europe and South America. Have you heard already positive sort of sales/order indications as generally commodity prices have been driven up?

Yes, but we don't want to talk about next year. But when you talk to dealers, customers, competitors in the various -- what I, for example, like is I like to talk to local players. Like in France, the market leader in soil preparation is a company called Tegua [ph] Bisance [ph]. So when I talk to Patrick Bisance [ph] about next year, I was basically expecting some kind of conservative statement. But they are all very positive about it. So far, what we hear from Europe and also what we hear in South America is pretty positive. And I think, without giving guidance here, I'm expecting also a great year 2013 for our industry, especially because of our strengths in Europe.

Your next question comes from the line of Jamie Cook of Credit Suisse. Jamie L. Cook - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: Two questions. One, with regards -- you took your pricing forecast modestly. Is that just still a function of more competitive pricing in Brazil? Or could you add color there? And then Martin, well, you don't want to talk about -- well, I won't ask you about 2013. Let me -- on Europe you seem, I guess, a lot more positive or you seem positive about 2013. I guess, I've been hearing from some suppliers, for example, Annexer [ph], reported this past week. They talked about a slowdown in ag, and I think they were focused more on Western Europe. There was another supplier who on the axle side, so -- I mean, within Europe is it still very much south versus north. Is there anything that you're seeing in the west -- on the northern side of Europe that's concerning you at all?

Actually, I'm not concerned about Europe. And also, when you talk to suppliers, you have to understand where are their main markets. So in axles, if we -- most probably, we talk about the same company. This is a company who does most of the business in Italy for Italian manufacturers, smaller and bigger ones. And they, of course, are then hit more. We have different concerns. We have some of our suppliers who have capacity issues, and that is also a reason why then we have some inventory problems here and there. So overall, my discussion includes, of course, suppliers. We talked to suppliers, but you need to understand where they do business and what is the nature of their business overall. You get a good picture, if you talk to tire guys, to hydraulic manufacturers and so and so. And I had, so far, not one discussion where anybody was assuming any kind of slowdown in Europe. And then I want to make also a little statement on the drought. Of course, we do business here in the open nature, so that means not everything we are doing can be 100% controlled. This is a severe drought. But of course, we have those situations also in the past. One year, it's the rain, and we have too much water. Another year, we don't have enough. So overall, of course, my assumption is not that this drought will now go on for the next 5 years. So that means, I'm not an expert, but if you just believe in statistics, then you could assume that also next year, the corn belt could come back. And what I hear from companies focused in seeding, they are very bullish about 2013, and there's no reason why to be pessimistic. Andy? Well, who wants to talk about the price?

Sure. Jamie, we did tweak our pricing. I think it went from $3.5 to -- $3 to $3.5, so 20 or 30 basis points. And actually, we think we'll get a little more pricing at, I guess, about Brazil specifically. So it's not that. It's just probably in our other markets that we're just being a little more cautious, and we haven't seen quite the level of price increases that we had expected. So it's just a slight tweak but not related to Brazil.

And Jamie, Brazil is not more or less competitive than any other market in the world. The industry has consolidated, but it does not mean that we don't compete. I think we compete quite a bit, which is good for our customers. So they certainly don't have to pay too much for excellent products.

Your next question comes from Ashish Gupta of CLSA. Ashish Gupta - Credit Agricole Securities (USA) Inc., Research Division: Just if we take a step back, and I think about the long term, is it fair to say you kind of become more bullish on the next 2 to 3, 4 years for equipment demand? The higher CapEx part of that, just the lower ending stocks tend to sets up for multiple years of high production and sort of catching up with consumption.

Well, when I'm not on a call, but for example, talk to the media, my guidance is very bullish. And I mentioned that, and I'm quoted there also for the next 100 years. So -- and you know that you always talk about the important criteria -- factful criteria, which result into a high demand. So I think the demand for farm goods will also grow in the future, and we talked already several times about the growing sector. It's a growing world population, changing diets in the emerging markets, renewable energies and so on. And I can add now in the meantime that also a lot of the chemical industries try to replace crude oil derivatives by organic products. So that means, overall, I am personally very optimistic about the future of farming globally. Not to talk about certain areas of the world, where I see huge growth opportunities. And this, of course, is also true for the next, let's say, 5 years. I'm rather optimistic. And you can see that last time, during the financial crisis, our industry reacted late but reacted somewhat because, of course, farmers also sometimes act like consumers in a way and can hold back investments. And we don't see that so far and hopefully, also not in the near future. Ashish Gupta - Credit Agricole Securities (USA) Inc., Research Division: Great. And just kind of a -- more of a follow-up on GSI on your comment that you're seeing a lot of interest from your international dealers. Has your view continued to evolve on that end in terms of the long-term opportunity? Does it seem like it's going to be a bigger international opportunity in the near term? I know you talked about a 5-year outlook of about $1 billion.

Yes. I think this is an easy target how I see it. And there are certain -- let's say, when you think about why there are certain markets like China, for example, where big international many American companies invest, companies like Tyson [ph] and so on, and they basically like the idea to go in with a standard set of solutions for the farmers and for the investors. And then in the grain segment, we talked already about that in -- most, let's say, about 50% of the harvest in Russia and Africa and countries like that are lost after harvest. So everybody needs investment and compared to smaller players in our industry, now we can basically take GSI by our hand and help them to get in touch with local dealers and people who are already connected with the market and with customers. And that's a big real synergy because we don't -- GSI doesn't have to go there and hire many people. So we have already a structure in place. And with only a little investment, we basically can grow that export business substantially. And also, I think the other advantage we have, in some of those markets, we already invested in manufacturing. But in a way that -- in some areas, it's like a start-up. When we talk, for example, about China, we have plenty of space. And we can offer GSI some manufacturing space, which will not change our cost position in total sales situation in Russia and some other markets. So that means for GSI, the big advantage is that they can now have either access to those markets on a very moderate cost base.

Your next question comes from the line of Michael Cox of Piper Jaffray.

My first question is just trying to reconcile the qualitative commentary around your bullishness around 2013 versus the down year-over-year order boards at the end of June. Should I take that to mean that you're expecting orders to recover as we move closer to harvest in the northern hemisphere?

No, you need to make the right comparison. So we compare our order board here in this presentation to last year. And last year, our order books were record high. So if you compare to a normal average order book we have in a very good year, we are still doing fine. So therefore, I don't expect a huge change. I think this was a normal situation, and we needed also in some of our area and some of our products' order book to be a little lower because we just couldn't cope with it.

We still have probably 4 to 5 months of orders in North America and Europe. So that, for us, is a good level.

Okay. One quick follow-up on the tax rate, it was down quite a bit from the first quarter. What should we be expecting for the tax rate in the back half of the year?

In the back half -- well, we're changing our full year expectation, bringing it down a little more to about 26%, 27% on the full year basis. So second half, that will pull it down a little more than what we had originally thought.

Was there any one-time type of benefit in that quarter? Or is it just a mix of...

No, it's mix. It's primarily the improvement in the Northern America earnings drives that rate down.

Your next question comes from Jerry Revich of Goldman Sachs.

Andy, can you say more about the margin expansion in South America versus last year, versus last quarter however you want to frame it? Yes, how much of that was due to the weak real versus other cost savings? It doesn't sound like, based on your earlier answer, your pricing was a big part of the answer there.

Jerry, in the first quarter, we had some impact from acquisitions that pulled down the margins a little unusually in the second quarter. Things kind of got back to normal, and we've been doing a great job in terms of managing material cost in Brazil. As you point out, pricing isn't great. But it's positive. So we're getting a good differential between how we're managing material cost and what the pricing is. And then the mix was a little better in the second quarter as well. So those were the key drivers. On an FX point of view, it probably gave us 20, 30 basis points improvement.

And in terms of investment spending you've outlined in China, what's the timing around that? It doesn't look like you've spent much in this quarter. Just give us a sense for how we should think about back half of the year versus what we saw this quarter?

Yes. As you look at both the expenses around start-up costs in China, let's say, more like 60% to 70% of that will be in the back half. And then on the Fendt side, where we have start-up costs relating to the movement into the new assembly operation, you have more like 70% of those costs in the back half, primarily in the third quarter.

Okay. And in terms of -- with the GSI business, you've outlined the year-to-date sales of roughly $400 million, which call it 60% of your full year of sales guidance but sharply higher proportion of profits. What's going on with the cost structure in the back half of the year versus the front half? And just help us understand, please, the typical seasonality in the business.

What happens is the fourth quarter is the lowest quarter of the year. It's only -- the sales are less than 20% of the total. And so what you see is in the third quarter, they start ramping down production. So the production levels are the highest in the second quarter. It starts to be ramped down in the third, and then the fourth is relatively low production and industrial activity there. And so as a result, you see some reduction in margins, just not as much leverage over the cost structure there. So that's pulling the margins down. Overall, the margins are still very strong for the full year. Excluding amortization intangibles, we should be in the 15% to 15.5% range. But in the fourth quarter, again, the margins are quite low and pulled that number down for the year.

Your next question comes from Steve Volkmann of Jefferies. Stephen E. Volkmann - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: Just Martin, curious how you're thinking might have evolved with respect to dividends.

Yes. So I think I reflected about our position already a little bit, and I would like Andy to make the legally right statement in order to keep me out of jail.

Well, 2 things. We've been obviously interested in changing our capital allocation strategy. And as you can see in our release, the very back end of our release, we have gotten our board to approve a share repurchase program. And that program is designed to primarily focus on limiting the amount of dilution that's created by our equity incentive plans that we have. So we have a $50 million share buyback authorization, and we should see some amount of share buybacks starting here at the back end of this year. As it relates to dividends, that's another part of our strategy. And we intend to have a thorough discussion with our board in the back half of this year, and we'd hope that we'll have something that we can announce later this year. Our intention is to strongly consider a dividend in the future. Stephen E. Volkmann - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: Okay, great. And I apologize if I might have missed this. But just given the production sort of timing, especially with respect to Fendt in Europe, did you give us any sense of what the margin trajectory third quarter, fourth quarter we should sort of expect?

Yes. In terms of the third quarter, we should see some margin improvement, but it will be limited because of some of the issues that you've discussed, some of the start-up costs and things like that. So we're looking at probably somewhere in that 50-basis-point improvement in the back half of the year as oppose to much more improvement. So as we get to the full year, we're again looking somewhere 50, 75 but maybe even a little bit higher than that for the full year. Stephen E. Volkmann - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: So 50 bps in the back half, that's year-over-year?

Right.

Your next question comes from Andy Casey of Wells Fargo.

Back to North America, and then I'd like to go international for one question. But realizing the Midwest's horrible drought, based on your experience, do farmers invest with crop insurance proceeds?

Yes, so many farmers do. So it's not an individual decision so -- but you will -- that is something, therefore, difficult to discuss but some will be compensated.

Okay. And then in the context of your disclosure on the good backlogs and some of the products in North America, if the conditions continue to decline and for whatever reasons, farmer investment starts to decline as well. Can you help us understand what you're looking at? Or what you're watching to initiate production curtailment actions?

Andy, what we always do in these situations, whether the market is going up or down, is we monitor certain things very closely, certainly orders. We monitor retail activity. And certainly, what -- that's what drives all of our business planning as the sale to the end customer. And then we monitor dealer inventory levels. So all those are critical factors in determining what our production and sales forecast should be. Because obviously, we -- there's no benefit in increasing our level of inventory to our dealers. We want to see that flowing through the customers -- end customers. And so we'll be monitoring that very closely, looking at our order boards. And if there's adjustments up or down, we'll continue to do that in the normal course of our activities.

What we do have -- basically, we try to have about 20% to 30% term labor in our factories, which makes us very flexible. This year, and most probably I think also next year, our problem is just the opposite. We need capacity in some of our factories. And so last year also in the U.S., we hired about 500 people. So therefore, we are not looking into the direction of sizing the factories down, but we can do it if needed rather quickly.

Okay. And then could you comment if you're seeing any short-term demand impact from the Russian drought? Or is the replacement demand more than offsetting any issues over there?

The replacement amount is huge, so that means the drought will not really matter in Russia at all.

Your next question comes from the line of Tim Thein of Citigroup.

Just coming back on the comments you made regard to -- with regards to pricing. Andy, is that relative to price cost? Is your outlook for the year changed? You mentioned that the tick-down in pricing -- just interested to hear how that's kind of trended relative to your outlook for material cost for the balance of the year.

No, I'd say it's pretty stable. We're seeing not much pressure on material cost. And so a small change in pricing is probably not going to affect our overall margin outlook. So we're still confident and feel comfortable that we'll get those margins that we have forecasted in the back half of the year.

And the main driving factor for us [indiscernible] just very important component for us is the automotive industry and with their production going down globally. Not in the U.S. but globally, we see steel prices also going down, which is a big advantage for us.

All right, that's I was getting at in terms of -- or have you seen that corresponding benefit that may be moving in tandem with that?

We see that.

Okay. And just on the GSI breakdown, can you remind us what the -- you gave the sales split between grain storage versus protein. Do you have a rough proxy in terms of the EBITDA contribution between those 2 businesses?

The margins between those 2 businesses are roughly the same. So you can assume its proportional.

And it's like 50/50. In a way, it's something -- make it easy.

Your next question comes from the line of Joel Tiss [ph] of BMO.

I've heard a little bit about financing weakening in Europe, and I just wondered if you're seeing that at all.

We do not see that. Most of our farmers' financing needs are taken care of by AGCO Finance anyhow, so therefore, we don't see that. And then in many European markets, you have dedicated special banks so -- where you might see problems. In general, you don't see it in farming because you have Credit Agricole in -- for example, as one of those focus banks in France. And you have coop banks in the Netherlands and Germany and in Scandinavia. So therefore -- and they never were involved in the -- they didn't take the risk of some of other banks, because they were much more local. And therefore, they're not -- I think I would be astonished if a farmer would have a problem to finance his investment.

Okay. And then I don't know if you answered this or not. But the margin in the U.S. business, is that excluding GSI? Is that a new sustainable level you think? And I don't mean across all cycles and everything. But are we -- are you kind of hitting your stride a little more? Or is there something in there that was a little unique to the quarter that we're still kind of building?

They're incredibly behind. Andy already talked about the details, and he can give you an update on that. But overall, of course, there's a strategy for margin improvements for AGCO globally but certainly, also here for North America, where there's a lot of strategic initiatives we implemented. And now Andy can go into the details because -- you did it already.

Joel, I think you always have to keep in mind seasonality. So -- and the second quarter is a seasonally strong margin period for us. As I said, some of these was due to sprayers, which is really a first half product line; hay equipments, very strong in the second quarter. So there's some seasonality there. But from the standpoint of -- if you look over a full year of whether these margins are sustainable, we certainly believe they are and continuing to work on other improvement opportunities in the market there.

Your final question comes from the line of Seth Weber of RBC Capital Markets.

Just going back to the higher dealer number -- inventory numbers, can you comment -- are you seeing any change in used equipment? Is that starting to back up at all? Or have used equipment prices changed?

We don't see, first of all, higher dealer inventory numbers in general. So the dealer inventories are in good shape. We don't see any increase in used, and we don't see any price deterioration in used either. So the markets are very strong.

Okay. And then just lastly, your Fendt expansion should be -- I think you walked through it. Your payments are kind of back-half loaded this year. I mean, is CapEx, do you think, continuing to move up to the right next year? Or do you think that we'll have -- this is kind of a peakish number, and it should start to trend down?

As we look forward, we would expect another relatively heavy CapEx period in 2013 as well. The big project for 2013 is the manufacturing facility in China, and most of the spending for that project is in 2013. So we still have the opportunity to move CapEx up and down to some extent, but our projections are that it will be in the same level at least in 2013.

That was our final question. Presenters, do you have any closing remarks?

Yes, thank you. I -- we just wanted to thank everyone for their participation and encourage you to follow up later today if you have additional questions. Thank you.

This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.