Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Zymeworks Fourth Quarter and Year-End Results Conference Call and Webcast. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode, and the conference is being recorded. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jack Spinks, Manager of Investor Relations at Zymeworks. Jack, please go ahead.

Good afternoon, and welcome everyone. My name is Jack Spinks, Manager of Investor Relations here at Zymeworks. Today, we will discuss our fourth quarter and year-end 2021 financial results as well as provide an update to our ongoing business. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that we will be making a number of forward-looking statements during this call, including statements that relate to the implementation of our strategic priorities; clinical development of our product candidates, related clinical trials, anticipated clinical data presentations, potential therapeutic effects of zanidatamab, and other product candidates; expected financial performance and future financial position; the commercial potential of technology platforms and product candidates; anticipated continued receipt of revenue from existing and future partners; our preclinical pipeline; anticipated sufficiency of cash resources and other potential sources of cash to fund our planned operations into the second half of 2023 and potentially beyond; the anticipated completion of, scope of and potential cost savings from our announced targeted reduction in workforce; our ability to execute new collaborations and partnerships; and other information that is not historical information. Forward-looking statements are based upon our current expectations and various assumptions, and are subject to the usual risks and uncertainties associated with companies in our industry and in our stage of development. For a discussion of these risks and uncertainties, refer you to our latest SEC filings as found on our Web site and as filed with the SEC. Later in this call, Neil will be discussing our financial results, including certain non-GAAP measures. A description of our non-GAAP measures and a reconciliation to the most directly comparable financial results as determined in accordance with GAAP are described in detail in our press release, which is available on our Web site at www.zymeworks.com under the Investor Relations tab. As a reminder, the audio and slides from this call will be available on the Zymeworks Web site later today. With that, I will turn the call over to Neil Klompas, our Chief Operating Officer. Neil?

Thanks, Jack, and hello everyone. Thank you for joining us today for our first earnings call of 2022. Before we dive in, I'd like to note that while I'll be presenting the prepared remarks today, our entire executive team will be available for Q&A following this portion of the call. I'd also like to highlight that going forward, in addition to periodic conference calls where we'll discuss and highlight significant matters, we anticipate holding quarterly earnings calls as we look to increase the regular cadence of engagement was Zymeworks shareholders and report on our progress. As always, we look forward to the opportunities for public dialogue with our shareholders and those tuning in. I would like to quickly touch on two items. First, I want to highlight the larger corporate objectives that we as a management team are seeking to achieve. With a corporate restructuring already well underway, we are continuing to align and increase our focus across the organization with the overarching goal of building a leading biopharmaceutical company with an exciting and expanding pipeline of product candidates from early discovery research through late-stage clinical development that we hope will make a significant difference for patients around the world with hard to treat cancers. While we continue to make some internal adjustments as we work towards that goal, Zymeworks has a clinically relevant drug, next generation technology platforms that can build truly novel therapeutics and a focus team that can execute and deliver upon our stated objectives. This is key as we look to make significant progress towards achieving our corporate objectives through a more value focused, cost efficient and effective organization. Second, as you may have seen in today's earnings announcement, I would like to start the call by congratulating Chris Astle, PhD who has been promoted effective…

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from Stephen Willey of Stifel. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. Can you hear me?

Yes, we can hear you.

Okay, cool. Hi, guys. This is Julie [ph] on for Steve. Thank you for taking my questions. If you guys don't mind, can you guys basically just comment on the status of your confirmatory Phase 3 BTC trial, whether you guys are still viewing this time as a first-line trial? And maybe if you could provide maybe timing on this trial, that would be great? And then I will have follow-up questions afterwards. Thank you.

Thanks for the question. Again, as you know, we're currently enrolling the second-line BTC study was zani and we expect that to be fully enrolled by mid this year. And then, as you know, the primary endpoint that’s the response rate. So after we have that data, it would be our expectation to review that data with the regulatory agency in the U.S., and at that time have discussions about the nature of the confirmatory study. So I don't think we'll prejudge those future regulatory interactions. And once we have an update about that after we have our data and have that regulatory interaction, I think it will be clear to make a disclosure about the nature of the confirmatory study around that indication.

Great, that's helpful. And my next question is actually related to ZW49. So I'm just wondering if you guys have been enrolling any HER2-expressing patients into the ZW49 development program and whether you think actually there is an opportunity for these assets in HER2-expressing patients. Thank you.

Yes, we've not yet enrolled patients in low expressing tumors in the ZW49 study. Obviously, we're aware of the opportunity. We're aware of the announcement that [indiscernible] made. We haven't seen the data yet, but obviously that's an opportunity for us to consider in the future. But we're not currently enrolling those patients in our ZW49 Phase 1.

Great. Thank you so much. That's all for me.

Thank you for your questions.

Our next question comes from Gena Wang of Barclays. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking our questions. This is Tom for Gena. I have two questions, one regarding to zani and the other one regarding ZW49. Starting with zani, as you announced the abstract submission to ASCO, can you just give a little bit more color on what exactly the study will be? Is that the zani-chemo PD-1 combo in the first-line GEA and the Phase 2 zani plus docetaxel in the first-line of metastatic breast cancer? And if so, can you help us to set the expectation on how many patients and the follow-up duration at the reader?

I'll take it from the first part of your question. Again, we just wanted to clarify that we had made abstract submissions for ASCO. Obviously, we need to wait until those are accepted and published online. And then we'll be glad to talk about them. At that time, I’m allowed to, and then also as they're presented at the conference. I don't think we'll add any more color to those abstracts until we know that they're accepted. And we understand what's really presented in the posters at that meeting or presentations of that.

Okay, that's fair. So for ZW49, just wondering what would be your bar or what kind of profile would you look for to form a go, no go decision? Is that comparable to like in HER2? Just want to hear your color on that.

Yes, I think from our standpoint, it is early clinical development. So we're trying to find a dosing regimen that we think will allow us to optimize the efficacy and patient populations in Phase 2. And obviously we're working on a more frequent regimen of dosing for ZW49 on a once weekly basis, which we hope will give us the therapeutic window that we need to move forward into Phase 2. So I think this is typically based more on this totality of the data that we've seen in Phase 1. It's been a pretty extensive Phase 1 program for ZW49. And I think after we finish this last cohort group this year, then we'll be able to make a decision based on the totality of the data rather than a specific benchmark, because it is early clinical development. We're aware of the opportunity for ZW49. We think it is an exciting compound. We just need to find a regimen that we think is appropriate to move forward into Phase 2. And we'll be able to provide all that data on the Phase 1 study in a publication in the second half, which will provide the rationale for how we're moving that forward into Phase 3.

Maybe just a quick follow up on the ADC technology platform. What kind of improvement in chemistry or technology should we expect in the next generation of your ADC platform, considering like multiple INDs will be up and running in the next years?

Yes. So as you're aware, ZW49 was moved into the clinical studies a number of years ago. Our current next generation ADC platform that we're working on with our preclinical candidates is a completely different ADC platform that we think is very competitive and world class. And I think we haven't talked too much about it yet. We're hoping to have an R&D forum in the fourth quarter of this year to fully explain the new platform that we have, why we think it's next generation, why we think it's world class, what targets we're specifically trying to pursue with that technology, why we might think it has some benefits over and above what we're seeing today with ADC and HER2, and what our strategy is looking forward on that, what the team is -- what the partnership strategy is? So I think once we have that forum later this year, we'll be able to talk more fulsomely about that.

Thank you.

Thanks for your question.

Our next question comes from Yigal Nochomovitz of Citigroup. Please go ahead.

Hi, Kenneth and team. Thanks for taking the question. So obviously you're aware of the TOPAZ-1 data, the Phase III trial, what AstraZeneca did in first-line biliary, which is the triple combo of Imfinzi and GemCis showed median OS of about 13 months, PFS of seven months. So given that, I just wanted to get your thoughts in terms of competitive positioning versus that data? Are you going to move ahead with the pivotal for zani plus chemo in first-line biliary? And what would be the factors that give you confidence that you can improve upon what AstraZeneca has shown in TOPAZ-1 with durvalumab [ph] plus chemo? Thanks.

That's a really good question. Again, I think I’m going to pass over to Neil Josephson, our CMO, to just talk a little bit about the TOPAZ data and how our use of zani can be effective in patient populations with biliary tract cancer.

Yes. Thank you. So TOPAZ-1 is an important study. It's an important advance for patients with biliary tract cancer. It's something that we have to look at in terms of if we are going to go into first-line biliary tract cancer as a potential and likely standard of care therapy. In terms of where zani is going to focus, zani is going to focus on patients that have HER2 amplification and expression. And we know from our experience in later line biliary tract cancer that we have a very active agent. And so we feel confident that for patients with HER2-amplified and overexpressing biliary tract cancer that zanidatamab in any line of therapy can improve the outcomes. So I don't want to take away anything from an advanced -- the advances is significant, but we're looking to improve on a specific population and we have a drug that targets an oncogenic driver in that population and believe that it can add to whatever benefit is given in general to biliary tract cancer patients.

Okay, great. That's very helpful. And then just also related to TOPAZ-1, obviously it's a very interesting study since it's showing that a new modulation can work in biliary and top of standard of care. I'm just wondering if you've thought about exploring zani plus tislelizumab plus chemo in first-line biliary, or maybe even the chemo-free approach of zani plus tislelizumab in first-line biliary which could give you essentially more options to compete against AstraZeneca's regimen?

Yes, we definitely are interested in the combination of zanidatamab with a PD-1 inhibitor. As you know, we're pursuing that in the gastric indications. But as you point out, there's now evidence that it's active in the biliary tract cancer or P1s have a place in biliary tract cancer. So, yes, it would be something that we would be interested in looking at. In terms of a specific study, we don't have anything planned or designed at this point.

Okay. And then just switching over to ZW49, obviously you saw the other competitive trial Destiny-Breast04 for HER2 which showed that they hit on PFS and OS, although they didn't disclose the details yet. Just wondering how that's impacting your strategic course and thinking with respect to developing ZW49 in the HER2 low population? Thank you.

Yes. So again, to sort of echo some of Ken's comments, I think that we are interested in HER2 low. It's not something that we've specifically been looking at in the Phase 1 study now, but it is definitely something that we believe ZW49 can play a role in. In addition, I would say that in HER2 and ZW49, while they are both ADCs, they have different mechanisms, factions. So it's not as if one and the other can't have roles in the same disease. So it's definitely true that HER2 is a very, very active drug. We believe that ZW49, if we develop it, can have in HER2 low would have an indication, a place and a role as well.

Thank you very much.

Our next question comes from Akash Tewari of Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. So previously the Zyme team had talked about aggressively finding partners for ZW25 to get value of the asset. But it's also kind of created a situation where investors have a difficult time understanding the market opportunity. If we assume 25 does not get partnered, which programs would Zyme be able to run by itself? And what would be the approximate cost of those studies? And should a situation where 25 doesn't get partnered, what would be our base case expectation? And then maybe just on ZW49. Is there any concerns that the eye [ph] toxicity we've seen with that ADC might be related to ZymeLink technology and therefore be a broader platform-related issue? What can you kind of comment on that theoretical concern? Thanks.

Thanks for the two questions. I'll take the first one and I'll ask Neil J to take the second one. But just on your first question, so today we've obviously been able to start and expect to complete two pivotal trials for zani with our regional partner, BeiGene, who as you know has rights in China, Korea and some other markets in Asia Pacific. So we can certainly undertake some good clinical development of that agent. And again, our second study in first-line GEA. It was a 700 patient study with 38 countries. So we're totally capable of doing that. I think from a commercial strategy, we've said this pretty consistently from the day I started. I think in the HER2 expressing tumor marketplace right now, we need to be partnering and collaborating with someone who can help us compete and broaden out the potential of zani and ZW49. And so that's what we're looking for. I think from our standpoint, we think there's interest in this marketplace. I think we're seeing -- potentially most of the recent data to redefine how these patients are classified and potentially open up treatment to a whole other range of patients that previously would not have been considered for therapy with the HER2 targeted agents. So we're quite comfortable that we have a good agent was zani. It's active. We’re in pivotal stages with a very differentiated antibody mechanism. And we think it has a place in the treatment of patients with HER2 expressing tumors and beyond BTC and GEA, and we're quite comfortable. There’s interest in folks who would like to join us and BeiGene to find a way to commercialize the results of multiple studies around the world and also embark upon additional pivotal studies in areas where we think zani can be extremely competitive and provide a clinical benefit that patients may not be getting from other therapies. So for us, our base case is that we need partnering to be able to compete. It's a good source of funding. It's a good way for us to optimize the value the brand currently has. And that's true not just with zani but also throughout the entire portfolio with ZW49 and the early research team. So we have a pretty broad and active partnering program throughout the portfolio. And I think we're finding lots of interest in the technology platforms that we have that produced zani and ZW49 and also the new platforms we have around next gen ADC and multi-specific platform format. So that is our base case is that we'll have partnerships in place to allow us to compete in a broader way than we currently have now, and it will allow us to fund obviously much broader clinical programs going forward and support commercialization around the world. And I'll let Neil answer the ZW49 question for you.

Yes. So you asked specifically about eye toxicity as being potentially a component of the underlying ADC technology. And I guess it's -- I would say that eye toxicity is something that it seems across a variety of ADCs. And so it's something that is inherent to how ADCs work. There's some off target toxicity in the eye with ADC. They are in some indications or maybe some on target toxicities as well. I think that the goal is to try to come up with a dosing regimen and an indication where you have the best therapeutic index. And so I don't see that the keratitis or eye toxicity that we've said exist with ZW49 is any different than with a toxicity that's -- other toxicities that have been seen with other ADCs. The issue for us is to try to develop it in a way where we can maximize the benefit of the drug and minimize the adverse events. And that's where we're headed.

Our next question comes from Jessica Fye of JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good afternoon. This is JL [ph] on for Jess. Thank you for taking our questions. So we have a couple of clarifying questions. On zani, can you confirm with us what dataset do you plan to submit to ASCO? And if the BeiGene dataset is positive in first-line breast cancer, what's your developmental plan over there? Do you plan to run a new study in Phase 2 in the U.S. by yourself, or do you plan to look for a new partner? And on ZW49, I know that today's press release says that there’s no dose limiting toxicity observed with the weekly dosing. But just curious, what about with the -- every three-week dosing regimen that you also are evaluating currently? Have you seen any outstanding safety signals right there? And lastly, I think you mentioned something about ODAC and I know that you just said we shouldn't be worried about that. But just would love to clarify one of the key issues raised by ODAC on your trial in combination with [indiscernible]?

Sure. Thanks for the question. I'll answer the first and third and I'll let Dr. Josephson answer the second one. So on the first question, all we can confirm is we've made a number of abstract submissions at ASCO. I think we'll wait until those are accepted and publicly available to then be able to talk about what's in those data abstracts. And also we'll obviously have the appropriate disclosure and investor event at ASCO around the actual presentations of those submissions. So we'll talk more about those until we get to that point. Also, we have discussed previously publicly that we're excited about the pivotal trials for BTC and GEA going forward with BeiGene for zani. We think there's additional clinical development opportunities there for zani to find a place to treat patients effectively with HER2 expressing tumors that may not be dealt with other competitive agents. Which ones we go to next, we have not decided. Obviously, we've done a bunch of work in breast cancer, both early and later stage. We've done work in colorectal cancer and we've actually done work in lung cancer as well. So we'll be looking at all the potential alternatives to go forward beyond BTC and GEA in the coming time period. And once we've made a decision about that, then we'll certainly make that disclosure. But as of today, we won't be able to make that disclosure. As more data comes in, is available to us and as we make that publicly available, which we'll do at ASCO, I think it will provide the rationale for the study we've already started and it will provide the rationale for the next stage of clinical development for zani. So we won't get ahead of that data in talking about it. I think to your third point, again, we had a few questions about our zani study after the events of [indiscernible] at FDA and ODAC, and we were just trying to clarify that our situation is not similar with respect to our global study for zani. So in GEA, we're doing 300 sites in 38 different countries. It's a very global, broad patient population that we're putting that study and we believe that will be sufficient enough to be filable [ph] in all major markets around the world. And that was the purpose of that study. We did have regulatory [indiscernible] FDA before that study. So it's not a similar situation. We just wanted to proactively talk about that, because we've had a few investor questions about that event that happened. It's not a similar situation. So we're not concerned about that at all. I'll let Dr. Josephson answer your ZW49 question about dose limiting toxicities.

Yes. So the issue with dose limiting toxicity or the announcement, that is true of both the two week and the three week. And I think what we're saying is that we've evaluated 30 patients at the three week and we're still trying to figure out what dose we'd like to get to or what we can get to and expand on in the two week. And as noted, we're going to release data on the second half of this year, and a lot of that information will be available at that time. So we'll have information about the dosing of multiple patients two week and the expansion cohort of that three week later this year.

[Operator Instructions]. Our next question comes from Charles Zhu of Guggenheim Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi. This is Edward on for Charles Zhu. Just a question on ZW49. In the preclinical data, you showed that on a mass equivalent basis, you have better efficacy actually than in HER2. But we know that you -- in HER2 dose that every three weeks at 5 mg/kg to 6 mg/kg depending on the indication. And that for ZW49, you're going at 2.5 mg/kg every week. How do you think about the exposure levels that you'll be able to get with this different dosing regimen and how competitive you think you could be? Do you think that will sort of translate until the efficacy there?

Again, I can tell you that we're going to release data later this year. And at that point, you'll have a chance to see what dose we've gone to on the two week and then also on the q three week. We'll be talking about the exposures that we can achieve in the two different dosing regimens. And then again, just to point out that in HER2 and ZW49 are both ADCs, but they have much different mechanisms of action, and where their places in the clinic can be very different. And for us the challenge is to find out how we can meet the unmet needs of patients and there still are unmet needs of patients [indiscernible] disease or even HER2 low disease that we believe that ZW49 can help us meet.

There appear to be no further questions. I'd like to turn the conference back over to Zymeworks for closing remarks.

Thank you, operator. And again, I just wanted to close and say, we really appreciate your time on the call. I know there's been world events today that everyone's been paying attention to, which are much more important than a biotech company's earnings call. But we certainly appreciate your time and attention. And again, our thoughts today [indiscernible] completely with those in the Ukraine and their families who may be worried outside of Ukraine and we're just thinking about them as a part of this call. So really appreciate your attention today. And we look forward to reporting more progress on what I hope is a really exciting year for Zymeworks in 2022. And we look forward to reporting progress in the weeks and months ahead, and then answer your questions as we can about that. So thank you for your attention and time. We look forward to talking to you again.

This concludes today's conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating, and have a pleasant day.