Greetings and welcome to the Zeta 3Q '24 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce you to your host, Madison Serras, Investor Relations. Thank you Madison. You may begin.

Thank you operator. Hello everyone and thank you for joining us for Zeta's third quarter 2024 conference call. Today's presentation and earnings release are available on Zeta's Investor Relations website at investors.zetaglobal.com where you will also find links to our SEC filings along with other information about Zeta. Joining me on the call today are David Steinberg, Zeta's Co-Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Chris Greiner, Zeta's Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I'd like to remind everyone that statements made on this call as well as in the presentation and earnings release contain forward-looking statements regarding our financial outlook, business plans and objectives, and other future events and developments, including statements about the market potential of our products, potential competition, revenues of our products, and our goals and strategies. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These risks and uncertainties include those described in the company's earnings release and other filings with the SEC, and speak only as of today’s date. In addition, our discussion today will include references to certain supplemental non-GAAP financial measures, which should be considered in addition to and not as a substitute for our GAAP results. We use these non-GAAP measures in managing our business and believe they provide useful information for our investors. Reconciliations of the non-GAAP measures to the corresponding GAAP measures, where appropriate, can be found in the earnings presentation available on our website as well as our earnings release and other filings with the SEC. With that, I will now turn the call over to David.

Thank you, Madison. Good afternoon, everyone and thank you for joining us today. The bets we made seven years ago on artificial intelligence, the investment in a one-of-one marketing platform and our commitment to our customers' success, has resulted in record setting third quarter financial results above our previously raised guidance. In this quarter, we generated revenue of $268 million up 42% year-over-year with adjusted EBITDA of $54 million up 59% year-over-year. This translated into an adjusted EBITDA margin of 20% up 210 basis points year-over-year. Once again we are raising our full year 2024 revenue outlook, by $61 million to $986 million at the midpoint representing 35% year-over-year growth. Not only did we break the Rule of 60 for the first time as a company, but we were above the Rule of 50 excluding political candidate revenue. In addition to our financial achievements, we also strengthened our foundation. In Q3, we raised over $900 million in capital including the undrawn loan facility. We had record in-person attendance for our annual Zeta Live event. We announced our new intelligent mobile product, and our next generation of generative AI in addition to expanding our partnership with Snowflake and onboarding Yahoo! as a major new customer. And on the heels of the third quarter, we announced and closed the acquisition of LiveIntent. With the integration already underway, and synergy realization ahead of schedule. Our momentum can be directly linked to the acceleration of the AI revolution, where marketing is at the forefront. This is creating unprecedented opportunity for disruptive technology like the Zeta marketing platform, which is winning in the marketplace and winning big. Here is a snapshot of three transformative seven and eight figure deals, we closed in the third quarter. First, for an iconic global retail brand, Zeta was awarded…

Thank you, David, and good afternoon, everyone. The third quarter can be best summed up by the momentum that began in the first quarter and accelerated in the second quarter, continued into the third quarter, with even some notable improvements. Revenue growth accelerated to 42% and excluding the benefit from political candidate, once again topped 30% year-to-year. We set another scaled customer ARPU record, with 33% year-over-year growth. Direct revenue was up 41% year-to-year, reflecting agency adoption of direct channels. On the back of this positive mix shift, operating leverage flowed solidly to the bottom line, with adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow margins up 210 and 250 basis points, respectively, year-to-year. All told, it was our 13th consecutive beat and raise quarter. I'll focus today on three topics: I'll dive into the KPIs driving third quarter performance, I'll dig further into the agency opportunity, by discussing how early we are in ramping with large and independent agencies, and sharing examples of the positive direct mix shift we're starting to see. Finally, I'll close with our increased fourth quarter and full year guidance, comment on 2025 consensus estimates and preview the duration of our next long-term model. Let's start with the drivers of the third quarter's results. Revenue of $268 million grew 42% year-over-year, or 31% excluding $21 million of political candidate revenue. On both dimensions, our results exceeded recently updated guidance of at least $255 million or $245 million, excluding political Canada revenue. Strength was broad-based, on a year-to-date basis, net revenue retention is at the high end of our 110% to 115% model. We had another productive quarter of sales hiring, we're up to 155 quota carriers, a 20% increase from last year. Reaccelerating sales head count comes at an opportune time, with the RFP pipeline up 60%…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of DJ Hynes with Canaccord Genuity. Please proceed.

Thanks for all the color on the guidance. I appreciate you breaking all that stuff out and obviously, the agency color as well, super helpful. David, I want to ask about a completely separate topic, which is published or cloud, right? It's newer to the business. Just can you talk a little bit about your vision there, how to think about sizing the potential for that opportunity? I just don't have a good feel for how material that effort might be?

Well, thank you, DJ. I'd start by saying we see the publisher cloud as sort of our next really meaningful growth opportunity. We've got, obviously, CTV, which is growing very, very rapidly at scale. And then we've added mobile, which we're very excited about mobile, we expect to scale very, very quickly over the next few years. As you think about the publisher cloud today, the vast majority of publishers are not able to build deterministic marketing capabilities, to an individual that's visiting their portal. Because you've got a third-party SSP, the third-party SSP has to connect to a third-party DSP and the third-party DSP has to come up with a deterministic data set, most of the DSPs do not have that. Our vision is to put everything into one set. Just like when we launched the ZMP, we put AI and data as native to the application layer. It eliminated latency and allowed us to disintermediate, and continue to grow against legacy tech clouds. We believe by putting our SSP fully integrated into the DSP fully integrated into the data cloud, fully integrated into the publisher, will allow us to massively drive up the yield of marketing dollars to the publisher that will flow to them through the publisher cloud, which will allow us to take a sizable exhaust rate off the top. So I think it's a big opportunity on platform, with high gross margin that will scale quickly in the years to come.

Yes. Super helpful color. Chris, maybe a follow-up for you. Can you just help us think about scaled customer ARPU growth? If we were to exclude the political candidate revenue, if we're excluding the agency customers, are maybe looking at them at like a brand level, I mean, obviously, the agencies skew that metric a bit, which is a good problem to have. But just trying to think about kind of underlying trends in customer spend on a cleaner basis if that makes sense?

It does make sense, DJ. Thanks for the question. If you take the 33% ARPU growth and you were to exclude political candidate revenue contribution, the growth rate would still - have been higher than the growth rate we saw in the second quarter, which was 22% ARPU growth in total. So if you take a growth rate that's in the mid-20s ex political candidate revenue contribution. And you then break that down between channel adoption, use case adoption and agency customer mix. It's actually very similar to what we saw in the second quarter where about a third of the growth, is attributable to each one of those drivers. So over 30% of our total skilled customers are now still using over three or more channels. Use case growth was again consistent across the acquired grown retain level. And as we mentioned and highlighted, brand adoption within the agencies continue to scale rapidly even at that superscale level, so brands that meet that greater than $1 million-plus threshold, that was up 29% year-over-year.

Yes. Okay, got it. That's helpful. Thank you guys. Congrats.

Thanks DJ. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Arjun Bhatia with William Blair. Please proceed.

Perfect. Thank you guys and congrats on a very strong quarter here. Maybe if I can start with the agencies. Again, it sounded like the mix shift in terms of the channels the agencies are using is starting to move a little bit more towards direct, which certainly is a big benefit. Can you just talk a little bit about, which channels on the digital side that you're seeing early adoption from? And where kind of we are in that overall journey of agencies moving more and more of their, spend on to the Zeta platform? And then for Chris, maybe you can talk a little bit about where we should think about gross margins going just from that impact?

So thank you, Arjun. I appreciate the congratulations. What I would say is, as our favorite tagline of we are just getting started, it is perfectly encapsulated in the migration of our agency clients from integrated platform to direct. What I would say is the three biggest wins we're seeing right now are connected television, online video and mobile. We're seeing the mobile adoption rate happen perhaps a little bit faster, than we originally expected. But it's been exciting, because not only have we been migrating some of the existing customers over. But as new brands have come on, as I think Chris did a really good job of outlining in his prepared remarks, we're seeing them start on direct. And I think that's a trend that will continue. If you look at our most mature agency client, who, by the way, is still growing nicely. But our most mature, I'll remind you, the first year they worked with us, they were approximately 93% integrated and 7% direct. In their third year, that was over 50-50 for direct versus indirect. So we don't need to move from 10% to 90%, to continue to move the mean up, which continues to move on platform versus integrated, which continues to drive gross margins, which I'll let Chris talk about.

Yes. So I think starting Arjun with the 41% direct revenue mix, if you were to break down, which channels drove that and then why we saw a benefit of mix. You had e-mail growing almost 30% at 29%, display video growing 46% and CTV growing north of 150% year-over-year. And by the way, that still has social growing over 50%. So when you have that type of positive mix shift like we saw quarter-over-quarter, we effectively moved the gross - the implied gross margin of the business up around 100 bps. As I think about what it could look like going forward, obviously, direct mix shift, as David mentioned, is now beginning to happen more consistently, across our enterprise brands, which should begin to chip away. It's not going to be moving 200 to 300 basis points at a time, quarter-to-quarter, but we should be able to continue to, in a very moderated way move the cost of revenues of the company down to the gross margins up.

Wonderful. That's great to hear. And thank you for that. And Chris, if I can follow-up on one for you. I saw the guidance for political contribution in Q4 had implied that it might be down from where Q3 shook out. Can you just maybe give a little color on what we should expect in political in the fourth quarter? And is that just - is that conservatism? Or is there kind of anything else that we should be aware of, given the last few election cycles played out for political revenue? Thank you.

Yes. Thanks, Arjun. Look, I think it's nothing really more than you've got three full months of political candidate revenue contribution, across the duration of the third quarter, and effectively one month in a week in the fourth quarter. I do think that there's upside to the 18. I don't think it's going to be as significant as what we saw when we updated the third quarter. But I do think we've left some room as there's still some political and advocacy spending trickling in.

All right, understood. Thank you. Congrats again, guys.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Richard Baldry with ROTH. Please proceed.

Thanks. Can you talk about any early feedback you've gotten sort of an open market post the LiveIntent acquisition? And then maybe with that as a backdrop, your cash stepped up significantly even once you pay the cash component of LiveIntent. So how's your appetite looking forward for acquisitions, or how does that play into your back now history of doing sort of buybacks on an ongoing basis? Thanks.

Well, so let me start with your first question first, Rich. We are seeing a faster-than-expected synergy recognition between the two organizations. Now a lot of that was Steve Gerber and his team really had been working on what we call quick wins, and we're seeing a number of them really flow through. And quite frankly, we're also seeing, in addition to cost savings, we have executed already a number of cross-selling relationships between the organization. So we're very excited about that. And we should have it fully integrated by the end of this month into the data cloud, from a signal recognition perspective. So really puts a belt and suspenders, and suspenders on the data cloud by adding all of those signals, and all of that data. What was the second question?

Acquisition has a...

Yes, we were even surprised. We're generating meaningful free cash flow as a company. Yes, we will be up even after paying the cash portion of LiveIntent. And we will continue to look for very opportunistic acquisitions with great teams, great technology, great data, where we believe that we can implement our four main pillars of M&A. We're going to stay disciplined to that. But what I would tell you, in the current environment, I believe we'll be able to continue to add great companies to Zeta in the coming months and quarters.

Thanks. Congrats on a great quarter.

Thanks, Rich.

Thank you, Rich.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ryan MacDonald with Needham. Please proceed.

Hi, thanks for taking my questions and congrats on a great quarter. Maybe to start on the independent agency channel opportunity that you talked about, obviously, going after about 1,000 of these opportunities and have expanded the sales force. Can you just talk about - one is, have you won any of these independent agencies thus far? And if so, what do the size potentially or revenue mix of those customers look like when you initially land them? And then just anything you could comment on sort of sort of sales cycles of these types of opportunities relative to, say, the direct business or maybe the top five agency Holdcos? Thanks.

So thank you, Ryan. Let me start by saying we have a number of executed contracts in the independent agency space and have more than one customer generating meaningful revenue. The beauty of these relationships is they are all, for the most part, I would say the vast majority are on platform. It's a platformization of the ZMP, to the independent agency that allows them to be hands on keyboard for their customers. So they are very high gross margin. They are on platform and they can scale very quickly. From a sales cycle perspective, I would say it's sort of in the middle if we can generally close an enterprise client in a faster period of time than a very large agency Holdco. These are sort of in the middle, but I would tell you, in particular, coming out of Zeta Live, the pipeline for these independent agencies is up multiples. And I expect we will have very good news on more than one of these to grow that this quarter.

Super helpful. Maybe just then on a second question on the LiveIntent business as you start to get that integrated and go-to-market there. Is there any difference in sort of the -- how is the go-to-market motion or the seasonality of that business operates in? Or is that more of a ratable revenue stream that we should expect as we move forward? And then any differences on the margin profile relative to core data? Thanks.

Yes. So to answer your last part first, yes, it's an exhaust rate business where you're taking a percentage on both sides of the transaction. So you take a percentage the advertiser and you then take a percentage of that net from the publisher. So it's a very high gross margin business, all of which is on platform. So I think that, that should be additive as we're able to really scale that business in the years to come. As it relates to at cycle, it will have a slightly higher Q4 only, because ad dollars tend to come in at a slightly higher growth rate in the fourth quarter, just across the ecosystem. But I expect it to continue to be a very solid, very steady channel for us in the years to come. And quite frankly, one of the things I love about the business is they have a bunch of blue chip clients that don't buy our products, and we have a bunch of blue chip clients that don't buy their products. The ability to cross-sell here is very unique. And I will tell you, we've already executed a number of contracts to cross-sell and are generating revenue from their customers in. So it's - an exciting, exciting deal for us.

Ryan, they also have a consistent go-to-market sales model like Zeta does, meaning a Hunter farmer. So it really kind of folds in very nicely.

Excellent. Thanks for the color.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Terry Tillman with Truist Securities. Please proceed.

Yes. I'll echo congratulations as well. David, Chris and Madison. Some of my questions have been answered. But one of the statistics that I think, David, you had discussed was 60% plus RFP or RFP pipeline growth. I hope I got that right, but from 90 days ago, that seems pretty dramatic. I'm curious if you could kind of double-click on that in terms of is this is the replacement cycle that's accelerating? Or was it some of the sales reps that Chris was talking about that you added and they just have an effect and becoming productive. Maybe the timing is Zeta Live. I just love to unpack that a little bit more because it sounds like that was a standout, and then I had a follow-up for Chris?

Well, thank you, Terry. Actually, Chris said it, but I'll take the question. Yes, the pipeline is up the pipeline is up 60% that we're very excited. It's probably the biggest pipeline increase we've ever seen, and we're already at scale. I think it was a combination of all of the above, right? What is the goal? The goal for Zeta is to go from Zeta who to why Zeta to must-have Zeta. And as we bring in substantially more senior sales reps than we ever had before, they bring books of business that help us evolve with that process. Zeta Live was a 100% grand slam this year. Even I was happy with our performance, and I joke I generally tend to be our biggest critic. And that was a massive growth to pipeline. As we publicly disclosed over 400 enterprises came and were represented at Zeta Live this year. That was a big part of it. In fact, we've already executed a multiple of the cost of Zeta Live in contracts from a lifetime value perspective. So really excited about that. And of course, we're continuing to evolve the brand with Forrester and IDC, and others rating us a leader or one of the leaders in categories, across the board that drives incremental pipeline.

That's great to hear. And I guess, sorry for my confusion earlier. I guess it's been a long earnings...

I was just making a joke…

Well, on the sales reps, one of the questions I think people are going to ask you a lot, it seems like you're at an inflection point here. What about maybe stepping on the gas more in hiring. And I know you're looking for the best of the best. But I think Chris had said about 150 or 155 reps and like up 20% or up 25%. I'm just curious how you're thinking about as you go into the New Year kind of steady growth, potentially if you can find it, pick up the pace of growth. And this long-winded question I'll end it with, does that include the 25 to 30 folks from LiveIntent? Thank you.

Terry, no, it does not. That's still core Zeta. We'll add probably around 25 to 30 LiveIntent reps when we reproduce the results next quarter and we blend the two businesses together. Look, it continues to be, as you said, really measured by quality over quantity. We continue to be very nicely diversified. In fact, half of our top 10 verticals grew over 35%. That's the first that we've had that type of balance at that growth rate. And we do try to hire on a vertical expertise. We still try to maintain the right ratio of hunters versus farmers, the hiring approvals are in full form. I mean there's no holding back in that area with our sales leaders, but it is very much a focus on quality over quantity.

And Terry, those 25 LiveIntent salespeople are going to be selling core data. So this is -- it's going to be a meaningful step-up in sales people right there. And as Chris said, we will hire every good salesperson we can get our hands on. Thanks, Terry.

That's great color. Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jackson Ader with KeyBanc. Please proceed.

Thanks for taking our questions, guys. Good evening. Can we actually follow-up really quickly, David, on what you just said about the LiveIntent sales reps. Would the expectation be - or I guess, has it been your experience that when you make an acquisition, bring on some salespeople, do they ramp as quickly or as consistently as net new hires that come from other competitors or other areas of software? Or does it take them a little bit longer to get used to selling core data? Thank you.

So the answer is it depends on the business. It depends on the product line they're used to selling. In this case, Jackson, there are tremendous similarities between the products they're selling and many of the products we sell at Zeta. So their products that are on platform, high gross margin that I would expect them to hit the ground really running. And then there'll be products that it might take them a little longer to scale up on, but we're very excited, and very bullish on this group of salespeople because there's so many similarities between their current products and what we sell.

Okay. All right. Great. Got it. And then a quick follow-up on the agencies. I guess I totally understand the leverage and the benefit from like those top five agency Holdcos. But I am curious what kind of multiplier effect to the independent agencies have? And is there - like does that multiplier effect in terms of brands that you can attack per agency, does that dwindle as you go out to the long tail of like the 1,000 that you're trying to target? Thank you.

Yes. I mean, yes, if you get out from number one in scale to number 1,000 in scale, it will dwindle just statistically. But what I would tell you is there are hundreds of independent agencies that represent billions of dollars in spend per year each. This is a meaningful opportunity, and we would expect each one of these independent agencies to be on platform, and we expect each one of them to be a super scaled customer at launch.

Okay. All right, great. Thank you.

Thanks, Jackson.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Matt Swanson with RBC. Please proceed.

All right, thank you guys for taking my question and I'll add my congratulations on the quarter. In Rule 60 quarter, it feels weird to be asking about a potential headwind. But across a lot of the advertising ecosystem, we've heard about kind of this political crowding effect for nonpolitical spend, just brands kind of pulling back because the CPMs got higher on political. Do you think there was any headwinds, I guess, to any of the Holdcos or your nonpolitical spend from the ramp-up of political?

If there is, we are not seeing it, Matt.

All right. Thank you. And then second was just on the Data Cloud and really kind of that 360 view of the customer that, you talked about specifically with LiveIntent. Can you just talk about kind of the compounding value of bringing differentiated data sets and how that kind of brings a more holistic view, kind of that one-plus-one equals three dynamic?

Yes. So one of the great things about LiveIntent is the number of e-mail hashed e-mails they see every month. You're talking over 240 million deterministic individuals that they're seeing across the entire Internet. We're able to see that across a very large number of publishers, they're able to see it across the 2,000 top and most premium publishers in the country. So by adding those incremental data sets, it's going to be a very, very additive signal to the data cloud. What I would also say is I do expect us to increase the number of individuals we see in the data cloud from, call it, around 240 million to as many as 245 million, might not sound like a humongous jump, but it is when you look at the additional signals, and the additional people who are added into the data cloud. As I earlier said, too, it also puts a belt and suspenders and suspenders on the data cloud. It's another massive importation of opted in first-party data in addition to the other data sets, we're already ingesting. In some cases, it's duplicative, but it's nice to know you have a belt and suspenders on that.

Thank you.

Thanks, Matt.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jason Kreyer with Craig-Hallum. Please proceed.

Great. Thank you, guys. Congrats again, I'll echo - great quarter. Just the success you saw in political this season, wondering if you think you can translate that into other verticals or maybe like the broader advocacy spend over time?

There's always a halo effect, Jason. First of all, thank you. You interact with these campaigns. When campaigns win, those individuals go into government and they join other packs and they join other ecosystems. And when those campaigns we work with lose, they go to other enterprises and agencies where we can work with them. So there is a nice halo effect that comes out of that component of the business.

Okay. And then maybe just a follow-up for Chris. Appreciate the color on agencies and how that has impacted that EBITDA to free cash flow conversion. Do you think we're primarily - like do you think that's trough by now do you think we're through kind of the majority of the headwind there? Because it sounds like you've penetrated the big five agencies reasonably well. And as you go after that mid-market or independent agencies, probably less of that free cash flow conversion or less of that gets trapped in that conversion there?

Jason, it was a 20-point headwind annualized all of last year, and that translated to like a $25 million deficit between working capital, so cash taken in versus cash paid out. It was about the same percentage point headwind in the third quarter, right? We reported 48% conversion from EBITDA, but it would have been 67%, if not for a $10 million working capital headwind. The growth would be large agencies, as we said in the script, is still in its very, very early days. And then when you add on top of it, the new opportunity we see with an even bigger count independent agency marketplace. I still expect us to have those headwinds, again, based purely on our growth rates and the industry's payment cycles. These are - we have no bad debt with any of these accounts, not even in the fringe of having to explore such a scenario. So it's just pure timing of when we get paid.

All right, got it. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Elizabeth Porter with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed.

Great. Thank you so much. I first wanted to ask about the mobile product, where you highlighted some faster-than-expected traction. And I believe LiveIntent also has a mobile product. So I'd just love to better understand the capability of Zeta's mobile product versus LiveIntent what the go-to-market strategy is between the two products and how we could think about mobile adoption scaling into next year?

Thank you, Elizabeth. Yes. No, we are seeing mobile scale faster than expected. We have multiple enterprise clients and agency clients already on it. The real breakthrough for us was the ability to put AI at the heart of the mobile product as well, which allows us to target deterministic individuals wherever they are. That's a big differentiator from others who are not able to see the deterministic level inside of that mobile environment. LiveIntent has a number of identifiers into that mobile environment, including mobile ID number on millions and millions of people. So the ability to put their capabilities together with our best-of-breed AI intelligent mobile product is scaling faster than expected. I think it will be our next meaningful product line after connected television.

Great. And then just as a follow-up, I wanted to ask about the collective contribution between political and advocacy. I believe last quarter it was referenced that it was less than $10 million collectively between political and advocacy. So is there an update that you could provide for Q3? And then looking ahead, the color on the halo effect was super helpful. And I just wanted to know if there's any cyclicality, to keep in mind for the advocacy group as we think about next year?

Yes. It's interesting. If you compare the - let's kind of take them in piece parts, to compare what we're seeing in 2024 to the 2022 cycle. The growth in political Canada revenue is substantial. And it was about back in - looking at the notes here back in 2022, we're up over 440% in political candidate revenue. It represents 56% of the total back in 2022, like 90% of the combined revenue is advocacy. In fact, advocacy on a third quarter basis versus the 2022 cycle is only up 3%. So it just so happened that this cycle, again, working across both sides of the aisle. Political name political candidate contribution was much higher. I think advocacy not only will it be a good contributor this year, but we're building a practice around it, so it can sustain itself in 2025, as well building people in addition to building capabilities into that ecosystem. But overall, political candidate contribution was a heavier part of our overall total advocacy in political Canada revenue this year. But as a mix, advocacy was actually down pretty substantially.

Thank you.

Thanks, Elizabeth.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Koji Ikeda with Bank of America. Please proceed.

Yes, thanks for taking the question, guys. Two from me. And the first one, it's about the 2025 commentary, Chris. I totally understand this year is going to be great from a growth perspective. Exit rate, 40%. But then excluding political and inorganic contributions more like 25%. And when we look at the organic side of the performance over the past two quarters, 30% plus. But when I think about the commentary that you have for 2025 on the organic standpoint, it looks like its low 20s. And so just is there anything we should be aware of in the business or the way you're thinking about the business in 2025 where organic growth wouldn't reach a similar type of performance that we have been seeing here?

Koji, I think what you're hearing from us directly is just Zeta wanting to continue to be conservative. And we have a cadence where we provide a significant amount of detail on the February call, which we'll do again, talk about not only the updated model for next year, but what's included in the new long-term model we continue to see ourselves as being a 20%-plus organic grower. My commentary would obviously imply that would be the case next year when you normalize for political candidate revenue, but we believe we have a great sales pipeline. We're building the sales force, many new products to bring to the market, which, again, 2025 is about setting an understanding of what we're comfortable with, but continuing to be conservative, and we plan to update that in February.

And remember, Koji, we came into this year below 20%, and here we are, right? So we're not suggesting we're going to continue to do it in that way. But there's nothing we're seeing in the business that's problematic. We're just trying to level set expectations. At the same time, a lot of people have said, oh, are they going to hit next year. So we want to make it clear, we see next year as a starting point. And we have beat and raised quarters in a row. Our goal is to be sitting here a year from now and saying it's 17 quarters in or, I guess, that would be 16 statistically, but you understand my point.

Yes. Totally get it. And just one follow-up here on LiveIntent. When I look at the acquisition deck, it did mention pro forma revenue around $76 million for this 2024. Any sort of update into the growth rates or growth rates you're seeing there post close? And any sort of purchasing accounting assumptions that we should be thinking about with this acquisition? Thanks guys.

Just in terms of growth rates, what we said back when we acquired it is a similar growth rate as Zeta has historically had, so call it right around 20% a bit over that. And it's - we're still in that kind of integration phase. We're excited about the synergies we're seeing. We'll give very specific guidance on the February call and what we're presuming for that business, but it's got a very healthy growth rate out of the gate.

Thank you.

Thanks, Koji.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Zach Cummins with B. Riley Securities. Please proceed.

Hi, good afternoon, David and Chris. Congrats on another strong quarter. David, I just wanted to ask about your expanded lineup of Gen AI agents that you rolled out at Zeta Live. I mean can you give us a sense of the interest you've been seeing from both agencies and enterprise clients? And any sort of update adoption trends as you think about expanding out that lineup?

Yes. So when we rolled out - I don't know if you were there, Zach, but when we rolled out the new AI agent studios, we did it on the innovation stage, which was the smaller stage. It was opposite like a rock star panel on the main stage. And the innovation stage with standing remotely, we couldn't get people to go back to the main stage from the innovation stage because people were so excited about the rollout of the AI agent. So what I would tell you is the adoption rate of our AI agents, is bigger than anything I've seen us do as a company yet. Clients are in the studio. They are building their own agents. They are using the collective agents that are available there. I think it's one of the reasons you heard Chris say that we are now at the top of our $110 million to $115 million net retention rate as a company, and could conceivably continue to go higher. We're seeing clients use these agents at an unparalleled pace, both agencies and enterprises.

Understood. And my one follow-up is really around partnership channel. Great to see expanded relationships with Snowflake also a new relationship with Yahoo! But any update you can give us on the system in a greater channel? I know you had plans of building out a practice on that side. So I'm just curious of how you're thinking about that as a lever for growth moving forward?

Yes. I mean, interestingly enough, we've already got two up and running. So we're just we're just trying to make sure that we really crack the code before we start really talking about it again. It was always meant to be a growth channel, and we've been pretty clear. It's not even in the numbers for 2025. But at the same time, it's working. So it's interesting to see the adoption rate. It's something that it's a very long sales cycle to get these guys up. So we're happy to have two. Our goal is to get two or three more in the coming quarters, and that's when I think it will become a meaningful driver to the business.

Understood. Well, thanks for taking my questions and best of luck with the rest of the quarter.

Thanks, Zach.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Clark Wright with D.A. Davidson. Please proceed.

Awesome. Thank you. Can you talk about the LiveIntent deal and how this will impact some of the KPIs, like the skilled customer account? And then additionally, do you believe that the 17 times uplift in ARPU from scaled customers to super scaled to be applied to the customers who started with LiveIntent and adopted other Zeta offerings?

Hi Clark, we're still - we'll give the LiveIntent figures, obviously, having acquired it post the end of third quarter, we'll do all the inclusion of their metrics at the end of this year, so in the February call. But broadly speaking, from an ARPU perspective, their combined ARPU as a company is closer to what ours is for the $100,000 to $1 million category. Their 1 million plus customers are closer to like 1.5 million compared to ours, that's almost 5 million. So we've got some early reads into it, but we'll give the rest of the details in February. But it will obviously result in a substantial number of incremental scale customers.

Yes. And I do want to point out, Clark, I think this is important to note. We did close that deal in Q4. So none of that deal none of the KPIs. None of the revenue is in the numbers we just reported for Q3.

Got it. Thank you. All my other questions have been answered.

Thanks Clark.

Thanks Clark. We'll talk to you later.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Brian Schwartz with Oppenheimer. Please proceed.

Yes, hi. Thanks for taking my question. I'll just ask one for the sake of time. David, I wanted to ask you where the spending is coming for your new agent studio product that you released. I know you talked to a lot of C-level executives. So as we think about the spending for these type of products and these agent products next year, is it coming out of IT budgets or our customers building a second budget for these AI products? And then talk to us how you can make sure that you can continue to gain share in that one. What is that dynamic? What are you seeing in terms of conversation in regards to the budgeting process for these new Asian products? Thanks.

Thank you, Brian. So what I would say is, like any new product, you're seeing it come out of multiple buckets, right? It's coming out of the IT budget. It's coming out of the software budget and some of it, it's coming out of the marketing budget. But truthfully, I do believe going into next year enterprises we're talking to because yes, we talk to a lot of CEOs are setting up standalone AI budgets around innovation. And we believe with our proprietary data because as we've said multiple times, AI is only as good as the data you feed into it. So when you put the CDP in place, you take their data, all of our data, that's where the magic happens. You've got all of their first-party proprietary data, all of our first-party proprietary data, and you begin to look at how the algorithms get smarter and smarter. The beauty and the thing I love most about this component of the enterprise budget, Brian, is its cost savings to the enterprise. So we're able to put out an AI agent that can eliminate $10,000, $250,000 a year data science jobs, to put it in perspective. And in exchange for that $2.5 million in savings, they might be spending $200,000 or $300,000 with us. So it's a really, really good return on investment. And then from a growth perspective, what we find is our enterprise clients who use our CDPs, use our AI agents are substantially stickier. They scale faster.

Thanks for that color. Congratulations on the results.

Thank you Brian. I really appreciate you.

Thank you. Our last question comes from the line of Ryan MacWilliams with Barclays. Please proceed.

Hi guys, thanks for the question. Love to hear just how the macro impacted Zeta in the quarter. And I know it's early, but have you noticed any changes from customers post the election in terms of unlocking marketing spend? And any thoughts into your customers' plans for holiday season messaging at this point for the fourth quarter?

Yes, Ryan. So - yes, we're - the certainty of the election with a winner without a long drawn out process has led not just the markets to react positively, but we're also seeing advertisers unlock dollars that we might not have expected.

Appreciate that. And anything on the holiday season at this point?

We put out our guidance. We obviously feel good about it. We raised the year's guidance by $61 million, which is quite a bit against our current budget. And listen, our goal is to be sitting with you in February talking about 2025 guidance, talking about our new 2028 long-term plan and announcing our 14th consecutive quarter of beating and raising guidance. So right now, we're feeling very, very good about the business. We're firing on 10 of 12 cylinders, and we really feel like the engine is doing well, and we're very bullish on Q4.

Appreciate that. And just on guidance for next year. Have the top five agency Holdco customers talked about their plans for Zeta next year? And would you expect your agency business, to be a stronger contributor to your revenue growth next year compared to this year?

I don't know about the last part. I think we'll have to see about that. The agencies have scaled very nicely, and we're very pleased, as I'm sure you heard in our prepared remarks, at what how fast some of our new agency clients are migrating to direct, which showed a step-up in our direct versus integrated platform revenue. I think that's a trend that will continue as we move forward. What I would say is that our largest agency client just renewed for another two, three years. We're seeing very bullish signs out of them, and we're working on the plan for next year. But there are minimum agreements already in most of our plans. And as I said, we're feeling very solid at having next year be, I forget if it's our fifth or sixth year in a row of -- sixth year in a row. Thank you, Chris, up 20-plus percent growth - organic.

Thank you for the color.

Thank you, Ryan.

Thanks, Chris.

Sure.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I would like to pass the call back over to David for closing comments.

Thank you, operator. I will end on, I have never been more proud or more excited to be running this business. We are executing exceptionally well. We're working in lockstep with our clients and our strategic partners. And I think that has been evidenced by the organic growth in this business that we expect to continue for many years to come. So thank you for attending the call, and we look forward to interacting with many of you again soon. Bye.

This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.