Bill Osbourn
Analyst · Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open
Thank you, John. Before I start the review of our financial results, I'll take a few minutes to discuss the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our first quarter results. Until the late February time frame, we expected to deliver results in line with our plan. But as the global economic disruption caused by the pandemic worsened, like many other companies, our business slowed. The lockdown in businesses resulted in delays in equipment installs and purchase decisions. And the variable components of post-sale revenue, such as managed print services agreements where revenue is based upon the number of page clicks declined. The third month of any quarter is typically our strongest, when the largest proportion of equipment is sold and profit is recorded. Therefore our first quarter was significantly impacted by the ramping of office closures in March, which limited our ability to deliver and install equipment. Further, as more businesses require employees to work from home, the use of Xerox equipment declined, impacting our post-sale revenue. Most of our customer relationships are contractual, with contract terms that typically include a discharge as well as a variable component that includes service and supplies linked to print volume and the percentage of fixed versus variable component varies by channel and geography. As a result, COVID-19 had a greater impact on equipment sales in Q1, as deliveries and installs which would have occurred late in the quarter were unable to be completed, while the decline in post-sale revenue was somewhat contained due to our contractual business. Through Project Own It, we have become a more agile operation and we were able to react quickly as the pandemic became more widespread. Project Own It initiatives have been ongoing and savings from these initiatives provided a partial offset to the sudden revenue impact from the health crisis. In addition, during March we implemented an operational resilience plan focused on cash and expense management in preserving our strong balance sheet in order to mitigate the impact of the crisis on our operations and business. With regard to our customer financing operations, we have low historical bad debts less than 1% of revenue in 2019, but increased our bad debt reserve by approximately $60 million in the first quarter to reflect an expected increase in write-offs of customer lease receivables, resulting from the pandemic. Our bad debt reserve is an estimate of losses that are expected to be incurred in the future and is calculated by applying a projected loss rate to our portfolios by country based upon historical trends and projected behavior, which takes into account global factors. In assessing the level of bad debt reserve in Q1, we looked at current and forecasted economic conditions, current portfolio credit metrics, as well as the level of write-offs on our portfolio during the credit crisis in 2008 and 2009. As of March 31, 2020, 4.4% of our finance receivables were reserved compared to 2.6% as of December 31, 2019. Our finance portfolio is diverse with no significant concentration in any one name, industry or geography, and we have a disciplined credit policy and are working with our customers and partners to reserve relationships over the long-term. Importantly, we have a strong balance sheet and sufficient liquidity with approximately $2.7 billion of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of Q1 and a $1.8 billion undrawn revolving credit facility that matures in the third quarter of 2022. Now, looking at the income statement. Total revenues in the quarter declined 13.9% in constant currency and 14.7% in actual currency. Until March, we expected revenue to come in closer to our plan, which would have been a decline in the mid-single digits. Turning to profitability, adjusted operating margin of 4.7% in Q1 was 630 basis points lower year-over-year, largely as a result of 190 basis point decline in gross margin, and a 410 basis point increase in SAG as a percentage of revenue, including 330 basis points from the increased bad debt provision. The decline in gross margin is impacted by lower revenues, including higher-margin post-sale revenue, primarily as a result of business closures due to the COVID-19 health crisis as well as the impact of price reductions in line with historical trends, transaction currency and tariffs, which are partially offset by benefits from our Project Own It transformation actions. Operating income was impacted by accelerated revenue declines resulting in lower gross profit that were only partially offset by expense reductions and includes an approximate $60 million increase in bad debt expense, which as I mentioned covers our projection of higher bad debt as a result of the pandemic. Last RD&E as a percent of revenue increased 30 basis points and contributed to the decline in operating margin. However, RD&E expense declined by $8 million year-over-year, partially due to the timing of investments. Below operating profit, other expense net of $23 million was $16 million better than the prior year, primarily due to lower non-service retirement-related costs, lower non-financing interest expense, and higher interest income. The lower non-financing interest expense is a result of a lower average debt balance and the higher interest income is due to a higher cash balance, which includes $2.3 billion of proceeds from the sale of our interest in Fuji Xerox and XIP to Fujifilm in November. Our adjusted tax rate in the quarter was 29.4% and compared to 26.3% in the prior year. The higher tax rate year-over-year is primarily due to geographic mix of profits as well as the impact of discrete items on lower pre-tax income. Adjusted EPS of $0.21 was down $0.45 compared to Q1 2019 significantly off our planned earnings level which anticipated growth year-over-year. The decline was largely driven by the COVID-19 impact on operations, which offset the benefits from cost reductions and also a $0.20 impact from an increase in bad debt expense. Benefits from lower net interest expense, lower shares and other cost reductions were offset by the negative impact from higher taxes, tariffs and transaction currency. The GAAP loss of $0.03 per share was $0.37 lower year-over-year, including the aforementioned $0.45 decline in adjusted EPS partially offset by a net benefit of non-GAAP adjusted items related to lower non-service related pension expense and higher transaction costs related to the HP transaction. Non-GAAP adjustments to EPS include restructuring and related costs, the amortization of intangible assets, non-service retirement related costs, transaction and related costs and debt and contract termination costs, as well as the income tax on those adjustments. In Q1, we recorded $41 million of restructuring and related costs. And for 2020, we still expect restructuring charges of approximately $175 million for the full year. Moving now to slide 8, I'll discuss cash flow. As you are aware this management team is focused on cash. John and I remind you of this fact every quarter because it is our priority and we have a detailed cash management process in place, which in a macro environment such as this has become even more detailed. We are monitoring cash inflows and outflows daily. We are reducing discretionary spend and we are redirecting investments to the most critical areas. I'll discuss more on our view of both cash and liquidity shortly and we'll now look at our first quarter cash flows. In Q1, we generated $173 million of operating cash flow from continuing operations, which was $49 million lower than the first quarter of 2019 primarily driven by lower income. Working capital was $133 million better than the prior year, reflecting the higher cash from accounts receivables due to lower revenue and higher cash from payables due to the timing of payments partially offset by a lower level of purchases. The higher cash generation from accounts receivable and accounts payable was partially offset by higher inventory levels. Inventory levels were impacted by equipment installation delays and lower demand for post-sale, primarily caused by office closures in March. The year-over-year change in cash in the other category is primarily in other current and long-term liabilities, which reflects lower accruals particularly incentive-related accruals associated with indirect channel partners in the current year and the timing of payments for restructuring related costs in the prior year. Restructuring payments of $35 million were in line with prior year and we continue to expect full year restructuring payments of approximately $175 million. CapEx was $23 million in the quarter and free cash flow was $150 million. We still expect CapEx of approximately $100 million for full year 2020, primarily related to investments in our IT infrastructure. In investing cash flow, acquisition spend of approximately $193 million includes three acquisitions in the U.K. and one in Canada, all to further our SMB strategy internationally. The spend is above the $100 million that we guided to for tuck-in acquisitions in 2020. However, we did spend well under our $100 million in 2019 as a couple of the acquisitions that closed in Q1 were originally expected to close in Q4 of last year. We now expect our full year 2020 tuck-in M&A to be in the $200 million to $300 million range. As John mentioned, we will continue to be opportunistic about M&A despite the COVID-19 crisis and we'll continue our disciplined approach, evaluating the returns on any cash allocation strategy. Lastly, within financing cash flows, we returned $58 million in dividends to shareholders in the first quarter and we did not have any share repurchases in the quarter. We had no payments on debt and ended the quarter with $4.3 billion of debt and approximately $2.7 billion of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash on our balance sheet. Let's now turn to slide 9 for more detail on revenue. First quarter revenue declined 14.7% or 13.9% in constant currency. As I mentioned earlier, as of the end of February we had been on path to deliver revenue within our planned level, but as our first quarter business is largely skewed to March, the expansion of the pandemic disproportionately impacted our first quarter revenue. Geographically, Americas revenue declined 11.8% in constant currency while EMEA was down 17.6% in constant currency. Our European operations were more heavily impacted due to the earlier onset of the pandemic, which resulted in business closures in the entire month of March, while in North America business shutdowns impacted our operations largely in the second half of the month. In addition, a large proportion of our business in Europe is through indirect channels, which was heavily impacted in March as channel partners lowered purchases to manage their cash and inventories, while in the US we have a larger direct business for SMB and large enterprise customers. Equipment sale revenue was down 27% in constant currency in the quarter with every product segment impacted. However, equipment sales grew in our US enterprise operations, which among other industries, covers government, health care, education, pharmaceuticals and food industry clients, all essential industries during this pandemic. These customers are continuing to invest in new equipment and in certain areas are developing applications that are increasing print volume. For example, in education, remote learning is driving more print flowing to production facilities, either in school districts or in print service providers for workbooks and worksheets to support teachers and students embarking on remote learning to navigate school closures. Looking at activity in the quarter, the decline in sales in our high-end devices is primarily in the lower end of the range, which was impacted by office closures and lower indirect channel activity. This was partially offset by the demand for our Baltoro Inkjet Press, iGen and Continuous Feed Color systems. In the midrange, we experienced a significant decline in our European indirect channel partners as well as in our US indirect channels and XBS organization. They have primarily served SMB customers and were significantly impacted by the March slowdown in activity. In our entry segment, lower channel sales in EMEA and the US were partially offset by a large order in Eurasia that occurred earlier in the quarter. Wholesale revenue declined 11.4% actual currency or 10.5% in constant currency. Post-sale was impacted by the industry trend of lower volume devices and page volumes. But in the first quarter, page volumes dropped further as offices closed and more employees began working remotely. While our post sale revenue is largely contractual, our bundled contracts have a fixed component as well as a variable component that is based upon credit volume. In addition, we had lower activity in unbundled supplies, which are largely in indirect channels and developing markets. Xerox Services revenue declined approximately 8% year-over-year in constant currency, also impacted by March closures. Services declines were down significantly more in European operations as compared to the U.S. However, signings in both Europe and the US were very strong. We had significant growth in renewals with the highest renewal win rate in over two years, and the new business signings rate of decline improved significantly compared to 2019. We have implemented revenue actions that are focused on maintaining stability in our core markets while building capabilities to capture new opportunities. We are continuing to invest in our top line, an area that are essential for today and in our innovation areas that are key for our longer-term future. John talked about some of the offerings that support a flexible work environment such as digital mail services and IT services supporting remote workers and learners. Our investments in top line, in addition to improved signings in Q1 and our mostly contractual business gives us confidence in our revenue rebounding as businesses resume operations. Now turning to slide 10, I'll review our profit and earnings. Adjusted operating margin was 4.7% in the quarter, well below our target due to the significant decline in revenue caused by the pandemic. As a result of the discipline we have developed through our Project Own It transformation program, we quickly implemented actions to reduce discretionary spend in response to the pandemic. These actions are in addition to our plans and initiatives and our program to achieve at least $450 million of gross savings in 2020, which we are on track to deliver across seven targeted functional cost areas, with a goal of simplifying our operations. In 2019, we achieved $640 million of gross cost savings, and importantly, began the transformation to make our operations more agile, which will help us through the current prices. Adjusted EPS of $0.21 declined $0.45 year-over-year, well below our plan in which we expected an increase year-over-year. As I mentioned earlier, the decline was largely driven by the impact of COVID-19 on operations and the $0.20 impact from an increase in bad debt expense as well as the negative impacts of higher taxes and transaction currency, which were partially offset by lower net interest expense, lower shares and other cost reductions. Moving on to slide 11 and a review of our capital structure, we ended the quarter with $4.3 billion of debt, of which $3 billion supports customer financing activities and therefore we break down our debt between financing debt and core debt. Financing debt is allocated by applying a 7:1 leverage to our financing receivables and equipment on operating leases, which together comprise our total finance assets. Core debt was approximately $1.3 billion and we ended the quarter with approximately $2.7 billion of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, which puts us in a net cash position of approximately $1.4 billion when netting cash against core debt. In 2020, we have approximately $1 billion in bonds maturing which we plan to refinance over time through the debt capital markets or other alternatives such as securitization. Our liquidity position is strong with approximately $2.7 billion of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and a $1.8 billion bank revolver which is fully available to us. As of December 31, 2019 our net unfunded pension liability was $1.2 billion, which is comparable to the net balance at the end of 2018, as the increase in pension obligation as a result of lower discount rates was offset by asset returns and contributions. The net balance includes approximately $815 million of unfunded pension liabilities for plans that by design are not funded. In 2019, we contributed $141 million for worldwide pension plans and expect to contribute approximately $135 million in 2020. Last on Slide 12, I'll wrap up with some thoughts on the balance of 2020. During this unprecedented time we are focused on the health and safety of our employees, customers and partners and we are actively engaged in supporting the fight against this pandemic. We are also focused on mitigating the effect of this crisis on our business and operations. However, as John advised, the uncertainty around the containment of the pandemic and the business resumption makes it difficult to predict the full impact on our business operations and financial performance. As a result, we are withdrawing our previously issued full year 2020 financial guidance for revenue, EPS, adjusted operating margin and free cash flow. We've assessed the impacts on our business under several recovery scenarios and we expect the most significant impact in Q2 with a gradual recovery in Q3 and performance closer to our planned level in Q4. As we've stated, our revenues are largely contractual and we have demand built in from the Q1 delayed installations. Therefore, we believe we'll be able to rebound once businesses reopen. On capital allocation, we are committed to our dividend and our policy of returning at least 50% of free cash flow to shareholders. Our debt level is within our targeted leverage for an investment-grade credit metric and we have a strong balance sheet and liquidity which supports our dividend policy. We have a disciplined process for evaluating returns and cash allocation strategies including share repurchase to determine the best returns for our shareholders. I will now turn it back to John for some additional comments before going to Q&A.