Barry Wood
Analyst · Adam Goldstein, Private Investor. Please proceed with your question
Thanks Ryan and good morning everyone. Before I talk a little more on our results, I would like to walk you through our filing process leading up to today's announcement. As Ryan mentioned, we filed a registration statement on Form 10 to register our securities in the U.S. pursuant to the 1934 Exchange Act because we're seeking to list our common stock on NASDAQ under the symbol XPEL. To be clear, this is not an S-1 filing as we do not need to raise capital at this time. As required by the 1934 Act, the Form 10 necessitates inclusion of financial statements audited in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because we're designated as an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act of 2012, we're only required to submit two years of audited financials in the Form 10. As most of you know, our previous financial statements were under IFRS. Given that, we had to go through an IFRS to U.S. GAAP conversion for our 2017 and 2018 financial statements. And once that was completed, our U.S.-based auditor, Baker Tilly, had to re-audit our U.S. GAAP-converted 2017 financial statements as well as audit our 2018 U.S. GAAP financial statements. In addition, since we're currently still a Canadian reporting company, we requested and were granted an exemption by the Ontario Securities Commission, which allows us to file U.S. GAAP-based financial statements in Canada instead of the otherwise required IFRS-based financial statements. As a condition to granting this exemption request, the Ontario Securities Commission has required us to file U.S. GAAP-based 2018 interim or quarterly financial statements on SEDAR no later than April 30th. This effectively means that we have to quarterize, if you will, our audited 2018 annual GAAP financial statements, meaning that our IFRS to U.S. GAAP adjustments, which were determined on an annual basis, need to be applied on a quarterly basis. This has been completed, but as an SEC issuer, our 2018 quarterly statements are required to be reviewed by our auditors since they will be used as comparatives to our 2019 quarterly financial statements. And as such, we cannot discuss detailed quarterly results beyond revenue until these reviews are complete. As you would likely expect, there are differences in IFRS versus U.S. GAAP accounting standards. Consequently, we recorded various adjustments to convert to U.S. GAAP. One major difference is the way in which we account for our kit design costs. Under IFRS, we capitalize these costs and amortize them over their estimated useful life. Under U.S. GAAP, these costs are expensed as incurred and I'll comment more on our U.S. GAAP results a bit later. And as we mentioned earlier, our Form 10 was filed today. In general, Form 10s are automatically effective 60 days after the file date. We anticipate receiving comments from the SEC during this process and we will address those comments as we receive them. Assuming our NASDAQ application is approved, we cannot list on NASDAQ until all SEC comments are cleared. There has been no decision yet regarding the TSX Venture listing's future. As Ryan mentioned, pursuing a U.S. listing has been a long time coming for our company and we're very excited to enter this next chapter of our corporate life at XPEL. Now, let's take a more detailed look into our 2018 results. First, I'd like to point out that our income statement looks a little bit different than past presentations. Our revenue is broken out between product and service revenue in accordance with the U.S. reporting requirements. And as Ryan mentioned, total Q4 2018 revenue grew 33.1%, and our total 2018 annual revenue grew 63.3% to $109.9 million. And geographically, we saw strong growth in almost all of our regions, led by China, where revenue almost tripled in 2018. Product revenue grew 69.5% to $95.5 million. And in the product revenue category, paint protection film grew 72.8% to $85.5 million and represented 77.8% of our total revenue. Window film grew 43.2% and represented 6.7% of total revenue. Total service revenue grew 31.5% to $14 million. Our service revenue consists of access fees for our Design Access Program software or DAP; cut bank credits revenue, which represents cut fees charged for the use of our DAP software; and installation labor revenue from the labor portion of installation sales that are company-owned installation centers; and finally, training fee income, resulting primarily from fees charged for the attendance of our training classes. While software and installation labor categories are fairly straightforward, I want to briefly walk you through our cut bank program. The essence of our cut bank program is to incent customers who use our DAP to purchase our film. Basically, if you're a DAP user and you buy our film, you only pay your monthly access fee. When you buy our film, we add the total square footage of film you purchase from us to your cut bank. Think of it just like your checking account at your bank. One square footage is added, you have the ability to cut patterns up to the square footage balance in your cut bank. If your bank goes to zero, you cannot cut any more patterns until you deposit more square footage into your bank, either by buying more film from us or purchasing cut bank credits. Historically, we have offered to sell cut bank credits à la carte in certain circumstances. So, all-in-all, up until now, this was fairly straightforward. But for those of you that follow U.S. GAAP-based companies, you've likely heard of new revenue recognition standard known as ASC or Topic 606. I'm not going to go too deep into this, but 606 effectively required us to allocate a portion of our product revenue to service revenue for the estimated value of cut bank credits we added to customers' cut bank because they purchased our film. And under IFRS, this allocation was not made. So, back to service revenue results. Software revenue declined 9% due mainly to the restructuring of DAP access fees commensurate with the implementation of our cut bank program. Cut bank credits revenue increased a little under 50%, due mainly to strong product sales. Installation labor grew 40.5%, due mainly to continued strong demand in our company-owned installation centers. And as a side note, total installation revenue, combining product and labor, increased about 41%. As Ryan mentioned, we are particularly pleased with our gross profit results for 2018, which the dollar has doubled from 2017 and our gross margin percentage finished at 30.4%. And again, just to reiterate, gross margin remains a top focus for the company as we move into 2019. Our 2018 SG&A expenses grew 49.3% versus 2017 and represented 19.7% of total revenue. And you'll also notice the income statement presentation is a bit different in this category as well than in past because we were required to break out sales and marketing-related expenses from general and administrative expenses for U.S. reporting purposes. Sales and marketing expenses grew 37.5%, due mainly to continued support of the ongoing growth of the business. 2018 general and administrative expenses grew 55.4% versus 2017, due mainly to increases in personnel, occupancy, IT, and travel-related costs to support the ongoing growth of the business as well as increases in professional fees due mainly to the ancillary costs related to the preparation and filing of our registration statement. 2018 EBITDA grew $9.4 million to $13.0 million, reflecting strong revenue and gross margin performance and related operating leverage. And EBITDA margin for 2018 closed at 11.9%. As I mentioned earlier, one of the major changes from IFRS to U.S. GAAP is how we account for our kit design costs. Because we now expense these costs as incurred versus capitalizing and amortizing the costs over their estimated useful lives, our EBITDA calculation was impacted. Again, this is just a math exercise but just something to keep in mind going forward. 2018 net income grew $7.7 million to $8.7 million and represented 7.9% of total revenue. And EPS for 2018 closed at $0.32 per share. 2018 cash flow from ops grew $3.8 million to $6.8 million. And as Ryan alluded to in his comments on our balance sheet, our financial position remains very strong and were effectively net debt zero at 12/31/2018. In summary, we were very pleased with our 2018 results. We accomplished a lot and we look forward to continuing to execute as we move forward. And with that, operator, we'll now open the call for questions.