Good morning and welcome to the Wolverine Worldwide Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2014 Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode until the question-and-answer session of the conference call. This call is being recorded at the request of Wolverine Worldwide. If anyone has any objections, you may disconnect at this time. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to introduce Mr. Chris Hufnagel, Vice President of Strategy, Investor Relations and Communications for Wolverine Worldwide. Mr. Hufnagel, you may proceed.

Thank you, Andrew. Good morning and welcome to our fourth quarter and full year 2014 conference call. On the call today are Blake Krueger, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President and Don Grimes, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Earlier this morning, we announced our financial results for the fourth quarter and full year of 2014. The release is available on many new sites or it can be viewed from our corporate website at wolverineworldwide.com. If you would prefer to have a copy of the news release sent to you directly, please call Tyler Deur at 616-233-0500. This morning's press release included non-GAAP disclosures and these disclosures were reconciled with attached tables within the body of the release. Comments during today's earnings call will include some additional non-GAAP disclosures. There is a document posted on our corporate website entitled WWW Q4 2014 conference call supplemental tables that will reconcile these non-GAAP disclosures to GAAP. The document is accessible under the investor relations tab at our corporate website wolverineworldwide.com by clicking on the website link at the top of the page. Before I turn the call over to Blake to comment on our results, I'd like to remind you that predictions and projections made during today's conference call regarding Wolverine Worldwide and its operations are forward-looking statements under U.S. securities laws. As a result, we must caution you that as with any predictions or projections, there are number of factors that could cause results to differ materially. These important risk factors are identified in the company's SEC filings and in our press releases. With that being said, I would like to turn the call over to Blake Krueger. Blake?

Thanks Chris. Good morning everyone and thanks for joining us today. Earlier this morning we reported our fourth quarter and full year 2014 financial results, highlighted by a strong finish to the year which contributed to our fifth consecutive year of record revenue, record adjusted full year earnings, and another year of record cash flow. Our strong business model includes a diverse brand portfolio and expansive geographic footprint, a strong operations platform, and a disciplined approach to managing the business. For the quarter, revenue was up 9.2% over 10% on a currency neutral basis with earnings per share increasing over 36% to $0.30 per share. For the full year, we delivered record revenue of $2.76 billion representing growth of 2.6% versus the prior year. Adjusted diluted earnings per share for the full year were $1.62, representing growth of 13.3% and excellent earnings leverage. Before Don and I outline our expectations for 2015, I would like to briefly talk about some of the highlights from 2014. Specifically, we re-energized and repositioned our Sperry and Merrell brands which led to accelerated momentum in the back half of the year. Our meaningful progress here positions us well as we move forward and we expect stronger growth from both brands in 2015. We expanded our already extensive international footprint, especially for our newest brand Sperry, Saucony, and Keds. Since the closing of the acquisition, we have executed approximately 70 agreements for these three brands, opened almost 400 stores in Shop in Shops and increased global pairs by over 50%. Last year we drove very strong double-digit revenue growth in our international segment for these brands. We also maintained and in many cases accelerated the momentum in several of our other key brands including Cat, Saucony, Wolverine, Keds, and Chaco. We initiated our strategic realignment…

Thank you Blake and thanks to all of you for joining us on the call today. In fiscal 2014 Wolverine delivered its fifth consecutive year of record revenue as well as record adjusted earnings and another year of record free cash flow. The combined power of our brands, diversified business model, and strong international footprint continued to deliver solid results. I’d like to underscore Blake’s comment about how pleased we are with a very strong close of the fiscal year and that we are very excited about the brand building investments and growth prospect for fiscal 2015 and beyond. Our business is well positioned and our brands have significant global growth opportunities and we believe that now is the right time to accelerate investments behind our key brands. Driving brand awareness, enhancing our omnichannel platform to respond to consumers evolving shopping patterns, and further investing behind our international business will all better position the company for accelerated growth. I’ll now provide more details on the quarter in fiscal 2014 ended January 3, 2015 and conclude my prepared remarks by outlining the company’s expectations for fiscal 2015 including some commentary on the first quarter. I’d like to remind you that all current and prior year financial results discussed today have been adjusted to exclude integration expenses related to the PLG acquisition, restructuring charges related to the 2013 closure and sale of our Dominican Republic manufacturing facilities, restructuring charges related to the company’s strategic realignment plan and costs associated with fiscal 2013 debt refinancing. As we preliminarily reported last month, consolidated revenue in the fourth quarter was a record $808.9 million representing growth of 9.2% versus the prior year. As noted by Blake, the excellent performance was driven by mid-teen’s revenue growth from the Heritage Group, high single-digit revenue growth from the…

[Operator Instructions]. The first question comes from Jay Sole from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning.

Good morning Jay.

Can you explain, I just had two questions on the guidance for 2015. Could you talk about what is baked in for growth within the U.S. versus growth outside the U.S.? And then can you maybe just give a little bit more color, you mentioned gross margin should be up in the year, can you talk about what's driving that, is it product cost, is it mix that would be great, thank you?

Yes, as it relates to U.S. growth versus non-U.S. growth we eased out just the smallest amount of growth in the U.S. for the full fiscal year. We certainly expect stronger growth in the U.S. even with the impact of the 58 stores that were closed towards the end of fiscal 2014. So the U.S. growth given that factor would be kind of in the low mid single-digit range with stronger organic growth outside the United States. As it relates to the fiscal 2015 gross margin outlook there are number of factors that are shaping our expectation of modest gross margin expansion. We certainly have more aggressive pricing across some of our key brands that is certainly supported by the incremental marketing investment, it’s interesting that when you step forward with a robust incremental marketing plan your ability to get price increases through the retailers is enhanced. We are forecasting favorable brand mix, faster growth from our higher gross margin brands than the lower gross margin brands. We are seeing a modest benefit from lower crude oil prices and that benefit is coming through in lower raw material cost as well as lower freight cost particularly in the back half of the year. We expect less of a negative impact from inventory liquidations related to store closures. Even though we are closing - anticipate closing more stores in fiscal 2015 at the end of the year than we did in 2014, the inventory liquidation will be in a more rational orderly fashion throughout the course of the year, so less of a negative impact from that. We won’t have the Patagonia inventory liquidation which would put negative pressure on gross margin in the fourth quarter of 2014. And finally we’ll have lower - we anticipate having lower LIFO expense for the full fiscal year which negatively impacted full year gross margin in 2014 by about 10 basis points. So there are a number of factors that go into the gross margin outlook Jay but those are the primary ones.

Got it, thanks so much.

The next question comes from Ed Yruma from KeyBanc. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning and thanks for taking my questions. I guess Don just first a clarification question on the delta in guidance between what you offered in January versus today is it simply just a change in your underlying FX rates, were there any other kind of underlying assumption changes? Then I guess two, can you provide a little bit of color commentary on the earnings growth throughout the year, are there any things we should think about in terms of the cadence by which incremental brand building investments will kind of hit the P&L, thanks?

The vast, vast majority of the change in outlook for 2015 Ed is based on the change in FX environment between early in the calendar year and now and particularly the euro and the Canadian dollar. The Canadian dollar has weakened versus U.S. dollar by almost 7% from where it was at the end of the year and the euro has weakened by about 5% since the beginning of the year. So the vast majority is FX, probably a small amount based on about a million dollars so higher pension expense than we had anticipated when we give our preliminary outlook. And as it relates to the cadence of the marketing spend, we’re looking at double-digit increases in marketing spend in each quarter of the fiscal year. Kind of mid teens increase in each of Q1 and Q2. That increase goes up to about 30% in Q3 and then comes back down to mid teens increase in Q4. So this is not a case as has been the case in past year where the marketing spend is back end weighted. We’re coming out of the gates investing in order to drive some incremental business in the back half of the year but really get them to the maximum benefit we can in fiscal 2016 and beyond. So we have great progress [indiscernible] we have great brands [indiscernible]. And so we are kind of coming out with an aggressive investment posture from the beginning of the fiscal year.

Great, and one other follow up in terms of FX you provided kind of the impact to revenue and I know you said half of the operating margin decline is due to FX I guess, how should we think about the interplay between SG&A and COGS? Thanks.

Based on our expectation for FX rates across the major currencies we think SG&A will be favorably impacted, reported SG&A favorable impacted by about that $17 million year-over-year. And the reason it’s having a disproportionate impact on the cost of sales line because in addition to having a translation impact translating our foreign subsidiary P&L into U.S. dollars but also there is the product cost impact. And so the product cost impact as you know relates to buying our inventory in U.S. dollars and then having it translated into local currency for the foreign operations. And so the product cost impact is about $16 million on top of whatever translation impact is so those are disproportionate impact on the cost of sales line but SG&A is benefitting by based on our current assumptions about $17 million year-over-year.

Thanks so much.

Thanks.

The next question comes from Christian Buss from Credit Suisse. Please go ahead.

Yes, I was wondering if you could talk about how you’re thinking about the distributors and how they are responding to the currency impact. If you could talk about how that expectations flows through your revenue assumptions for the year that will be helpful as well?

Yes, Christian, I guess as you know most of the world buys their footwear in U.S. dollars. So this kind of significant strengthening of the U.S. dollars is certainly in most countries going to have an impact on cost of goods sold and therefore pricing at retail. We expect our distributors are going to take some price increases just as we’re going to take some price increases probably more towards the second half. On the other hand we source over a 100 million pair of footwear a year so we have a pretty large [pencil] [ph] and we’re going to use our sourcing power there maybe to re-engineer some footwear and to take some additional costs out of the supply chain as well.

Okay, that’s helpful. And then a housekeeping question. How much did pension expense contribute to the SG&A rates in the fourth quarter?

It was about -- pension expense was about $8.5 million -- $8.5 million lower in the quarter so that’s about 1% of the report - of the revenue reported.

Okay. That’s helpful. Thank you so much and best of luck.

Thanks Christian.

The next question comes from Chris Svezia from Susquehanna Financial Group. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning guys. Could you just maybe walk through two questions here; one, what rates are you assuming for the balance of the year assuming they sort of stay consistent to where they are? And I guess the second question is maybe if you can just walk through your thoughts by operating group as to how it plugs into that revenue outlook for the year between Lifestyle, Performance, and Heritage?

We actually have – Chris, we're a lot closer to spot rates in terms of our planning rates this year than we have been in years past. We typically have a little more of a gap between the rate we’re planning at and what current spot rates are. But given how the dollar though rapidly strengthened really over the last several months particularly against the euro and the Canadian Dollar, the rates that we’re using are very close to the spot rates. Since the dollar has weakened a little bit in the last week so there's a -- there's a tiniest sliver between rates we're using for plan but not much. I will also say partly in answer to your question that you know people have asked us about is the sensitivity of Wolverine's business to changes in the FX rate and for your benefit a 5% increase or decrease in U.S. dollar versus the currencies that we’re most exposed to, the euro, the Canadian dollar, and the pound, has about $21 million impact on reported revenue and by the time that flows through the P&L has about a $0.04 per share EPS impact. So that gives you some measure -- meaning if the dollar strengthens or weakens 5% from kind of where it is today versus all three currencies. That’s what you would expect to kind of flow through our P&L.

And then maybe Chris, the second part of your question -- how does this impact the various groups. Obviously, the Lifestyle Group would probably have the littlest impact as a result of the U.S. dollar. All things taken into consideration, all though they're having accelerated growth internationally at this point, it is still a relatively small base compared to our Merrell brand for example or certainly our more established Hush Puppy brand. As you know over 80% of our Hush Puppy pairs are outside the United States but some of those pairs unlike some of our other brands are sourced in local currencies. So -- we would expect an impact on Hush Puppies for a little bit but not as much as you might ordinarily think given that the percentage of footwear outside the United States.

Can I just clarify on that, well I guess, I was more curious about how does it -- how does each Lifestyle, Performance, and Heritage tie into that 2% to 4%, is it fair to say performances at the upper end, they are all at the upper end of the range. I'm just trying to see whether each one plugs in based on your sort of currency neutral thought process?

Yeah, I mean we tend to not break our revenue guidance down into operating group or brand level. I mean clearly the Lifestyle Group, Chris is going to be negatively impacted by the retail store closures. Given that the majority of those were of the 58 that we closed, two thirds or more were [inaudible]. So there will be a negative impact there for sure. But the Performance Group will benefit from another strong year of growth from Saucony, Chaco, and we talked about the mid-single-digit revenue growth from Merrell which is high single-digit on a constant currency basis. So they will be on that level of commentary and we can't stop there and much you got to fill in the blanks.

Alright, thank you, all the best.

Thanks.

The next question comes from Erinn Murphy - Piper Jaffray. Please go ahead.

Great, thanks. Good morning. Just building on that last question, just as we think about the brand trajectory for both Sperry and Merrell in 2015, it seems like both of those even on the constant currency basis start fairly start the acceleration, can you just maybe feel back what's driving that, is it more units, is it pricing? And then where are you also implying some incremental investments that you're making hoping to drive that revenue, are we seeing that throughout the year? Thank you.

Yeah, I mean first with respect to Sperry. I mean certainly we are very encouraged by the bounce we got in Q4 and we think that bounce is going to continue on to New Year. There is a lot -- a number of different things driving that. New brand platform, new product introduction, our consumer facing media spend for Sperry is going to increase above four fold in 2015. So we expect that to have certainly some impact on 2015 but even for Sperry most of that impact will be, we will see in 2016 and beyond. So we’ve got new leadership team energized and placed there. Our inventories for Sperry are pretty lean at retail right now which is also driving some of this performance in Q4 and what we expect in the coming years. So and as you know Sperry is still very early in its international development. On the Merrell side we’re most encouraged by also demand creation objectives and we have for this year, we’ve added new talent in the product area and we are focusing on our DTC business for Merrell. But at the end of the day with Merrell a lot of it comes down to simple product creation and that’s been our focus over the last couple of years. We know we have a few countries which were Merrell has some established distributors Russia for example that are going to be certainly be impacted by some of the macro political advance but overall we see Merrell driving growth across its performance outdoor category as well as its active lifestyle category.

And Erinn just to follow up a little bit, I am just going back to Sperry for a second. We’ve identified opportunities to take prices up a little more aggressively for certain collections and that certain is very gratifying to see. That is a source of some of the revenue growth that obviously had the disproportionate impact on the brands gross margin. And so but still very encouraged to see that and I would encourage, I know you guys saw a lot of companies and a lot of different brands you track but I would encourage you guys to go onto the Sperry top side or dotcom website and look at the new odyssey, the weight campaign which was just launched yesterday on the website that’s a much better scripter and you can get a better feel of the campaign just like had a Blake and I describe it to you over the phone but if you have time I really encourage you to take the time to do that.

Great, thanks that’s helpful and then just one clarification Don again for you, the 53rd week benefit, what was in the fourth quarter, what was the benefit specific to Sperry?

We’re quantifying the benefits from the 53rd week to our DTC operation given that we did ship on the wholesale side in the 53rd week but a lot of those shipments we feel we know were gone out in the 52nd week had a fiscal year only been 52 weeks. So in terms of trying to quantify the wholesalers, it is very difficult to do but the DTC list was about $7.5 million just from the stores being open seven more days and the website being open for consumer visits seven more days. And of that $7.5 million about 1.5 million was Sperry Top-Sider.

Okay, thank you. That's very helpful. Best of luck.

Alright thank you.

The next question comes from Scott Krasik from Buckingham Research. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. Thanks, can you hear me?

Yes, good morning Scott.

Okay and no one else thanks for doing promise call during industry trade show on the West Coast. Just a question on Merrell and you sort of addressed it a little but it is about product. I think you have been increasing your investment in marketing for the last couple of years, the business is basically flat in the U.S. so talk about the growth, how big you think Merrell can be given that it does seem to be maturing in some of your biggest market. And then just back in Latin America, we just always sort of penciled in double digit growth there it and obviously wasn’t in 2014. So just wondering what that is, the outlook for that region as a whole?

Yes I mean basically I’ll address your second question first. Latin America over the last three to five years we frankly have seen a lot of the governments there leaning left. Historically that hasn’t been especially good for business whether its consumer or soft goods or other industrial categories. Certainly we’re all aware of the special challenges in Venezuela and Argentina but it’s also impacting some other countries in Latin America. And it is really some of those macro business and consumer headwinds that are really having an impact on the Merrell business here in Latin America. With respect -- you had questions on Merrell itself, I would say we were very encouraged obviously by Merrell's Q4. Mid single-digit overall revenue increase I would say even though the U.S. market is Merrell's largest market, Merrell had an increase at the very high single-digit range in Q4. And that kind of bounce in our biggest market is certainly very encouraging. The Performance outdoor category continues to be very strong for Merrell. It had at least six consecutive double-digit increase in that category, quarterly increase. And active Lifestyle, that was up in the mid single-digit range in the fourth quarter. We're still -- we believe we are -- we are where we want to be in the Active Lifestyle segment of the market but it was encouraging to see a pretty significant bounce up the area. So as you know we had our international meetings with our distributors. Everybody here in Grand Rapids in November and the reaction to the new Merrell line was very good. So despite some of the currency headwinds we're encouraged globally as well.

And Scott I don't say this has got any particular level of excitement but the brand in the U.S. Merrell when you adjust for this transfer of the Merrell kids business, the Stride Rite which took place at the end of the year adjust for that. The brand was up in a low single-digits in the U.S. and faced the headwinds of a pretty significant decline in the outside athletic category for the brand which really is less brand specific and more category specific. And so -- we’re not adjusting with the actual U.S. growth for that but that certainly was the biggest negative factor on the brands growth in the U.S. in 2014 and we don't expect it obviously to be as much of a negative impact on the brands growth in 2015.

Okay, thanks. And then just last for me, what percentage of your EBIT comes from outside the U.S. at this point?

With PLG acquisition, when you factor in all corporate expenses it is about half.

Yeah.

In terms of Pairs, we would've about 54% to 55% of all Pairs would be in the Unites States, reported revenue would be in the low 70% range but about 55% of Pairs in the U.S. and about 45% of Pairs outside the U.S.

About half of our operating income, about half of our cash flow -- free cash flow is typically outside the U.S. The 2014 being an aberration given the benefit from the AR financing facility that -- would be a U.S. cash flow.

Yeah, alright thanks. That’s a good one.

Thanks.

The next u comes from Kate McShane from Citigroup. Please go ahead.

Thank you, good morning.

Good morning Kate.

I just had two quick housekeeping questions. With the increase in marketing spends in 2015, can you tell us how much marketing spend is increasing in terms of percentage of sales, where we are going from on a percentage of sales basis for marketing? And also do you have an update on the number of distributors signed up for the PLG brands and what the goal is for 2015?

Yeah, let me give you a -- let me answer your second question first. Don, will do the calculations for your first here. But we're encouraged -- the PLG brands are beginning to have some meaningful international business. The number of countries since the closing is up nearly 40%. I think our Pairs are up over 50% stores and shop-in-shops are up close to 60% since the time of the closings. As you know we it’s a bit of a slow build to get going but once you get the momentum it's almost like an annuity. So we don't -- we don't have specific targets in terms of numbers for 2015. Obviously, we have some regions like Asia Pacific which are certainly top of mind for Keds and Sperry for example.

Going back to your first question Kate, our marketing spend as a percent of sales in 2014 across the portfolio of course it differs -- can differ pretty dramatically by brands plus 4.6% and based on the $30 million of incremental investment program, a portion of that will be classified as marketing. We would expect that percentage to go up on that 80 basis points across the portfolio as a whole and for certain brands. And for obviously the biggest part of the incremental investment plan is minus Sperry brand. So Sperry marketing as a percent of revenue would be a more disproportionate impact but across the portfolio as a whole about 80 basis points.

Okay, thank you.

[Operator Instructions]. The next question comes from Danielle McCoy from Wunderlich Securities. Please go ahead.

Good morning guys, thanks for taking my questions. I was just wondering if you can go into a little bit more detail with some of the rebranding that we’re seeing in Sperry and Merrell in kind of a feedback you been getting from your key retail partners, is this leading to any new distribution just expansion of the words within old distribution or expansion within existing doors?

Maybe I’ll talk briefly about Sperry first. As you know the U.S. remains Sperry’s largest market so in the U.S. market the new marketing push, the new brand platform certainly for 2015 is going to have the biggest impact in the USA. I think from the product side Sperry is focused on being famous for boat. It’s the as you know the boat shoe silhouette it is the dominant player and it's frankly the job of that special brand to keep that silhouette fresh and in front of the consumer. But I think it’s also focused on elevating and expanding the Gold Cup platform, having a bigger presence in vulcanized and sneakers and both the men’s and women’s boots category had an exceptional performance in Q4. We are not seeing any consumer or retailer push back for Sperry’s expansion into adjacent product categories. So that’s all very, very encouraging. The new brand platform I think it’s also targeting a younger consumer with the Fairy collection, that collection currently has been and is under development. It’s going to be introduced for Spring 2016. Probably will be introduced late this Fall or Spring 2016. So that’s been a major focus of the new product team at Sperry. So we’ve reviewed the new brand platform, the category and product pushes and development with our international partners and in a more than a handful of our key U.S. accounts over the last three or four months or if the response has been frankly very, very positive.

Yes Danielle when you talk about getting new points of distribution I would say one of the benefits of the new marketing campaign and the investment behind that is really getting new countries at distribution. The outside the North America Sperry grew its wholesale revenue 26% in 2014 and the percent of wholesale that was outside of North America increased 200 basis points year-over-year. So we’re getting that kind of momentum in just having the new marketing campaign and newly signed international distributors get to get more charged up about when we have a new more evocative marketing campaign. And so that’s really where we’ll see the benefit as we go forward.

Overall for Sperry, it’s more doors internationally for sure and a few a more doors domestically but especially domestically it’s increased its shelf space more I think.

Okay, great and then just a housekeeping question, what should we be looking at as far as DNA for the year?

$50 million.

Okay, great. Thanks so much, good luck guys.

Thanks.

The next question comes from Mitch Kummetz from Robert Baird please go ahead. Q - Mitch Kummetz Yes, thanks for taking my questions. Can I ask you to -- which you are probably surprised, it was up double-digits for the quarter, I think it has been up double digit each quarter this quarter how –

I am sorry Mitch, we missed the first, what are you talking about? Are you talking about Keds, did we hear that right? Q - Mitch Kummetz Cat, yes is there any way you give us a sense as to how big that brand is. Now I know you don’t like to breakout brands, you talked a little bit in the past specifically about Merrell and Sperry’s but just given the growth that you’ve been experiencing in Cat it can be helpful to kind of give us a sense as to how big that business is and just remind us what’s driving the double digit growth you been experiencing for a while here.

Yes, Mitch as you know the cap really when we took over the global license for that brand 20 years ago it was largely a work brand here in the U.S. and a urban lifestyle brand outside the U.S. And certainly those two lines have merged over the last couple of decades and I think it’s helping to both categories frankly helping to fuel Cat growth. So we’re seeing really a tremendous uptick across the world really all regions including the U.S. U.S. would still be a little more focused on work as a market but we have seen big upticks as well in the Cat women’s business. I think part of the success and growth on the Cat over the last couple of years has also been driven by its international standalone concept stores. So we’re up to about a 108 Cat concept stores around the world. These are not just footwear stores, they are lifestyle stores featuring apparel bags and other accessories although in the stores well over half of our sales are tied directly to footwear. So I think that you kind of DTC initiative is having an impact on the Cat brand and the active and casual footwear styles internationally it is having a positive impact. I would also say internationally and domestically I haven’t really seen any fall off in the boot trend. And of course the boot trend is the heart of the Cat business and so Cat is certainly benefitting from that continuing trend. So it’s really the Cat business is certainly a significant contributor to us on the top line but even a more significant contributor on the bottom line because the way we report international revenue.

And just to frame the size of its Mitch by the way you’d like the way Blake didn’t answer that question specifically but he is well –-

I practiced.

But what I will say is that both Cat and Wolverine, the two biggest brands within the Heritage Group are materially larger than our Keds brand and I think you have a sense as to the size of the Cat business and they are each materially smaller than our Saucony brands and they are each individually less than 10% of the company’s consolidated revenue. Q - Mitch Kummetz Okay, that’s helpful. And then just to drill down little bit on Sperry just to get a better sense just kind of where that business is today? Could you tell us what percent of sales are coming from outside the U.S., I know you launched apparel this past Fall [indiscernible], could you say how -- what percentage of the business is not so at this point and can you also kind of speak to the boat, non boat percentage and all of this would refer to the full year 2014?

Yes, let me see if I can answer a few of those questions. I would say the boat shoe category for men’s in the U.S. now I’ll just talk about Sperry’s largest market, have stabilized and we saw a growth in men’s certainly at the wholesale level in the U.S. in Q4. The women’s business continues to find bottom in the pure boat shoe silhouette category although the women’s casual business in Q4 was flat and the boot business was up a very strong triple digits. So as a brand we kind of feel like the fashion component of the boat shoe for Sperry has kind of found bottom if you want to view it that way. And it appears to be only upside certainly on the men’s side in the near future. On the apparel and accessory side as you know we’ve had very strong licensing programs in swimwear, socks, eyewear, small leather goods, several other categories. We decided to make a major shift in Sperry apparel away from trying to create a business through our partner in the mid-tier department stores in the USA and focus on Sperry’s DTC business. That it is brick and mortar stores and its ecommerce business. So we’ve made a shift there and it’s really a shift that focus on the loyal Sperry consumer that's come into our own ecommerce sites and to our Sperry stores. So that’s switch and change will occur mid-year this year and we expect apparel in addition to these other categories to contribute significantly to the uplift in the DTC business for Sperry. And I forgot, what was your other question. Q - Mitch Kummetz Just international, I think Don you said the non-U.S. Sperry -- did you say up 26% for the year?

Non-North America. Q - Mitch Kummetz Where is non-North America as a percentage of total revenues for the year?

On the wholesale side its high single-digits if you look at outside of the United States and not just outside North America outside United States, its right on low double digits. Q - Mitch Kummetz Okay, thank you.

Thanks Mitch.

The next question comes from Sam Poser from Sterne Agee. Please go ahead.

Good morning, thank you for taking my question.

Hi.

Hi, a couple of questions. Number one, was there in the fourth quarter, obviously -- is Sperry now in the fourth quarter, how much of that increase those increases may have come from increased distribution number one? Number two, what was the Sperry same store sales for the first quarter? And number three where do you stay at [indiscernible] with the five year plan?

What was your third question Sam I missed it?

The 2018 targets?

On your first two questions for Sperry, I would say domestically probably or relatively small increase in Q4 came from new distribution for that brand. It was just improved sell throughs in existing distribution. Additional shelf space especially in the boot area and stronger results in DTC. When I look at for Q4 the DTC business for Sperry, I think that was your second question. I mean Sperry of all of our formats had probably the best performance in comp store increases, mid single-digit increases in Q4 so we saw.

I’ll say the Sperry specialty stores which they are more specialty stores than outlet stores comp high single-digits, the outlet stores of which there are 22 comp to mid single-digits.

Yes, so we were very pleased with our DTC performance for Sperry in Q4 and we expect that bounce back to continue into the coming year.

As it relates to the long range financial outlook for 2018 obviously a lot of things have happened in the last year and a half that we didn’t project or anticipate when we actually went out with 2018 financial targets. Probably the biggest single factor now is this significant strengthening of the U.S. dollar versus where we thought it would be a year and a half ago. We certainly didn’t contemplate closing up to 140 retail stores. We didn’t factor in the exit of the Patagonia footwear license although a small brand still one of the brands in the portfolio. So what we’ll say as it relates to the 2018 target that we’ve communicated in 2013, we are working as hard as we can and as diligently that we can to deliver as much revenue, as much earnings, and as much cash flow as we can in 2018. We are just going to try as hard as we can to hit those numbers and if we fall short it won’t be because of the lack of effort and that’s the kind of attitude we’ve had and your staff that serve the company and the shareholders well, I mean we continue to do that. We are not updating the long range financial target today. Don’t know when in the future we will. All I am going to say that we are working as hard as we can to deliver as much as we can by 2018 and beyond.

Thanks and then just one last thing, the seventh sense in the restructuring that’s on your tax and on your website towards 2015, that’s the only really non-recurring one time that would be involved within the guidance of I think 146 to 154, is that correct?

Yes that’s correct.

So you would add $0.07 to both sides of that and that would give you what the guidance is on a GAAP basis, on a non-GAAP basis?

Subtract, the 153 to 160 excludes the restructuring charges.

That’s okay, alright. Thank you very much, good luck.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Laurent Vasilescu from Macquarie please go ahead.

Good morning and thank you for taking my questions. I think during the 2013 Investor Day it was noted that the international gross margin was around 45% and I was curious to know where it stands for 2014 and how should we think about for 2015?

I don’t have the international gross margin in my finger tips, that was a kind of point in time disclosure as opposed to something that we consistently disclose. I think maybe the -- question was the impact of the higher mix of certain lower margin top line shipments in fiscal 2014. We did note in the Investor Day presentation kind of correcting what I think was a misperception about our international business that it was 100% very, very high gross margin royalty business. If you look at our international revenue across all brands in the portfolio about two thirds of the reported revenue is kind of lower than average top what we call top line or cost plus revenue. And about one third of the revenue is at that kind of pure gross profit, almost 100% gross margin royalty revenue. And what we had in the fourth quarter and for all of fiscal 2014 was a disproportionately higher impact or higher mix from the lower margin top line revenue which was a drag on gross margin. So, that way it was more top line revenue in our results in 2014 than we had anticipated at the beginning of the year, certainly even going into Q4 for that matter.

Okay great. And then in terms of the West Coast port strike, could you potentially quantify the potential impact to maybe COGS or SG&A for the first half of 2015?

Yes, at this point it is fluid mix, frankly hard to quantify. As you know we have been very proactive through this long negotiation process. We basically, the West Coast strike had almost no impact on our Q4 performance whatsoever. I would say things have deteriorated in the New Year here. The President and the Administration has finally gotten involved, sent for Labor Secretary out there to try and solve the last major issue. I think there is only one last major issue outstanding. I don’t -- right now we are planning for the worst so we have diverted some shipments to up and down the coast from Vancouver and Tacoma, down to some other ports. And we have diverted some shipments over to the East Coast but quite honestly there has been at least two occasions in the past where the Presidents have used their executive powers to end a West Coast strike or stop it and nip it in its bud and I wouldn’t be surprised if that happens again. I don’t think the administration is going to let a single labor dispute to have that kind of material impact on our economy as a whole.

Okay, great. And in terms of --

I hope I am right.

In terms of the guidance, I think there was discussion in the prepared remarks about buybacks for 2015, does your FY 2015 EPS guidance imply that buyback?

No, it does not. The share cap that we are using of 101 million does not include any buybacks.

Okay, thank you. Best of luck.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. The question-and-answer session has now ended. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Chris Hufnagel. Mr. Hufnagel, you may proceed.

Thank you Andrew. On behalf of Wolverine Worldwide, I'd like to thank you for joining us today. As a reminder, our conference call replay is available on our website at wolverineworldwide.com. The replay will be available until March 19, 2015. Thank you and good day.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.