Welcome to Wolverine World Wide second quarter 2009 earnings conference call. All participants will be in a listen only mode until the question and answer session of the conference call. This call is being recorded at the request of Wolverine World Wide. If anyone has any objections you may disconnect at this time. I would now like to introduce Ms. Christi Cowdin, Director of Investor Relations and Communications for Wolverine World Wide.

Welcome to our second quarter conference call. On the call today are Blake Krueger, our CEO and President and Don Grimes, our Senior Vice President and CFO. Earlier this morning we announced our second quarter 2009 results. If you did not yet receive a copy of the press release please call [Abby Brandt] at 616-233-0500 to have one sent to you. The release is also available on many news sites or it can be viewed from our corporate website at www.WolverineWorldWide.com. This morning’s press release included non-GAAP disclosures and these disclosures were reconciled with an attached table within the body of the press release. Today’s comments during the earnings call will include some additional non-GAAP disclosures. There is a posting at our corporate website that will reconcile these non-GAAP disclosures to GAAP. To view the documents please go to our corporate website www.WolverineWorldWide.com, click on investors in the navigation bar, click on webcast from the top navigation bar from the investor’s page and then click on the file called WWW Q2 Conference Call GAAP Versus Non-GAAP disclosures. Before I turn the call over to Blake Krueger to comment on our results, I’d like to caution you that the predictions and projections made in today’s conference call regarding Wolverine World Wide and its operations may be considered forward-looking statements by securities law. As a result, we much caution you that as with any prediction or projection, there are a number of factors that could cause results to differ materially. These important risk factors are identified in the company’s SEC filings and in our press releases. With that being said, I would now like to turn the call over to Blake.

This morning we reported very good results for the second quarter of 2009. Revenue in the quarter exceeded our internal plan and our earnings leverage was strong. We are obviously pleased with our second quarter results and our continued progress on several key brand initiatives. To this end, Merrell achieved excellent double digit growth in the important US market. We made good progress in moving Hush Puppies up market in North America. Our consumer direct business reported significantly improved trends towards the end of the quarter. Our fast track innovation of Chaco enabled us to deliver early shipments to our retailers and meet their demand. Our brands maintained and enhanced their positions as leaders in their respective categories. In these times we have positioned the company to consistently deliver excellent financial results by protecting and building the equity and integrity of our 12 lifestyle brands. This means we will continue to offer our consumers great value for the innovation and design our brands deliver all while maintaining our full price status and not participating in the current promotional environment. Overall, we were pleased with our first half performance and have increased our 2009 earnings per share guidance. I would like to begin my brand review with the Hush Puppies group which now includes the Cushe brand as well as Hush Puppies and Soft Style. Overall, the Hush Puppies group revenue in Q2 exceeded our internal forecast but was still down upper single digits on a constant currency basis. For the group, continued retail consolidation and lower consumer spending contributed to reduced revenue in the quarter. In spite of the challenge economy, our efforts aimed at moving the Hush Puppies brand up market in North America continues to show progress. Revenue was up low single digits and constant dollars. Product innovation…

This morning I will review our second quarter financial results in a little more detail and offer additional perspective on the first half of 2009. I will also provide some color on what we’re seeing for the balance of the year. We are very pleased that our solid earnings performance in the first two quarters of the year has given us the confidence to raise our full year earnings guidance, something that few companies have the luxury doing in such a brutally tough and volatile market place. Earlier today we reported second quarter revenue of $246.4 million, a decline of 7.8% compared to the second quarter 2008 revenue of $267.4 million. Well more than half of the reported revenue decline was driven by a stronger US dollar as constant currency revenue declined only 3.1% in the quarter. We were pleased by the outstanding performance by Merrell and Harley-Davidson in the US market, a strong start for the recently acquired Chaco brand and continued double digit growth for our licensed brand Patagonia. These wins were more than offset by the impact of tough trading conditions in many countries around the world. Nevertheless, our revenue performance in the quarter exceeded our internal operating plan. Stepping back a second from the financial review I’d like to discuss some of the macro trends that are influencing how we evaluate our own performance in the quarter and how it influences how we’re looking at the balance of the year. We saw a continuation in the quarter, in fact we saw acceleration in the quarter, of a couple of trends we’ve been talking about for several months now. The first of these trends is retailers placing orders closer to their date of need. We’ve been broadly referring to this trend as a shift from future orders…

We’re obviously pleased to have delivered another quarter of good results which is the end result of a great team managing and executing a proven business model. While we are not immune to the current economic environment our business model is strong and allows us to efficiently build global brands, limit risk and gain market share. Thanks for your time this morning and I’ll now turn the call back to the operator so we can take your questions.

(Operator Instructions) Your first question comes from Jim Duffy – Thomas Weisel Partners. Jim Duffy – Thomas Weisel Partners: My question relates to the SG&A, typically you see a greater sequential decline in SG&A from the first quarter to the second quarter and contemplating that you had $3.5 million of benefits from restructuring on a pro forma basis, can you provide a little commentary about SG&A dynamics during the quarter.

Just to clarify, that $3.5 million of benefits Jim, not all of it was in SG&A. There was a fair portion of that benefit in cost of sales. Jim Duffy – Thomas Weisel Partners: What would that split be Don?

We cited earlier in the year that about two thirds of SG&A and one third cost of sales when we were talking about the full year $17 to $19 million that’s a good number for the second quarter as well. One additional comment regarding SG&A, or two comments actually, there are some timing issues as it relates to some of the marketing advertising spend that hurt a little bit the Q2 SG&A performance compared to the first quarter. The second comment is that we had a bit of a true up of our incentive comp accrual. There’s a portion of our incentive comp programs that are driven by total shareholder returns and the very nice and very justifiable run up that we had in the second quarter on the Wolverine share price contributed to an adjustment to that accrual as of the end of Q2 which contributed about $1 million of incremental SG&A in the quarter.

Your next question comes from Scott Krasik – C. L. King & Associates, Inc. Scott Krasik – C. L. King & Associates, Inc.: Your comments Blake about feeling better about the backlog, you had previously talked about the third quarter being the weakest quarter of the year and I know currency is going to play in to that but, maybe talk about the visibility, what you’re seeing on the fall orders and also have you heard any commentary from retailers that they feel more confident about bringing spring 2010 orders in any earlier? I know they didn’t do much of that a year ago?

First let me see if I can address your backlog questions first. For our business backlog has been a good indicator of future performance in past years. Over the last two or three quarters it has become less of an accurate indicator for a number of reasons and frankly, that has to do with the Q3 and Q4 impact of the economic slowdown last year. So, if you look at our backlog today, as Don indicated, the quality of our backlog is much higher than it has been historically. Like many people, we took some order cancellations of a significant amount in Q3 and especially Q4 of last year. So, those order cancellations would be in our 2008 backlog figure but obviously, are not in our 2009 figure that we use for comparison so that really goes to Don’s comments about a significant increase in the quality of our backlog. We think frankly, our backlog quality has never been better than it is now because if you can get future orders out of retailers, they really expect to take that product in. And, I’d say that the backlog, we don’t usually talk about backlog spread amongst our brand groups but our backlog position is probably higher, a little bit stronger for Merrell than some of our other brands.

Scott, I will say that at the end of Q1 we did offer a little color on Q3 versus Q4 and Q2. We don’t offer quarterly guidance revenue or earnings guidance. Based on how the backlog with aging on April 22nd, the date we announced Q1 earnings, it appeared that Q3 was going to be the toughest of the remaining three quarters from a revenue comp standpoint. As we sit here today, our outlook on Q3 and Q4 is about the same in terms of year-over-year revenue growth so it doesn’t appear that Q3 is going to be materially worse than Q4 providing that same level of [inaudible] I guess. Scott Krasik – C. L. King & Associates, Inc.: To the retailers feeling confident about bringing spring ’10 order forward, any thoughts there?

I think my general impression is that the inventory levels at retail are as good as I’ve seen in the past year but I think everybody is still being very, very cautious especially for example department stores. While we don’t have a large percentage of our business with US department stores, they are being ultra conservative in their order placement at this time. So, I think generally retailers are expecting a relatively soft back-to-school season and they are planning conservatively for the holiday season at this point in time. When things snap, when things turnaround, they’re going to expect people like us to be able to deliver what they need on a much quicker basis and we’ve been preparing for that for some time. Scott Krasik – C. L. King & Associates, Inc.: Don then just lastly, you talked in the first quarter about savings above and beyond the restructuring, I think it was $7 million in that nature, did you pull back on some of those other programs in the second quarter? Are you saving those?

We definitely didn’t pull back Scott. As I mentioned in the first question to Jim, there was a bit of a timing issue on some marketing and advertising spend as well as the impact of the increase in our share price on the long term incentive comp portion on our incentive comp program that contributed about $1 million in SG&A in the quarter versus the first quarter. Scott Krasik – C. L. King & Associates, Inc.: Then for the back half of the year aside from the restructuring savings do you expect to get additional savings from some of these programs or will they be offset by incentive comp?

I think if you look at the first half of the year in terms of an adjusted SG&A decline that would be a good barometer for the second half of the year. Scott Krasik – C. L. King & Associates, Inc.: Excluding restructuring?

Excluding restructuring.

Your next question comes from Christopher Svezia – Susquehanna Financial Group. Christopher Svezia – Susquehanna Financial Group: Just to touch on the currency impact, if I might have missed this, Don can you just clarify what the currency impact was for the second quarter? I think last conference call you mentioned currency would have the biggest impact in Q2, lesser degree in Q3 and somewhat a minimal impact in Q4. I think you just commented that it seemed like it was shifting a little bit more to the second half given how your hedged?

Yes, what you cited was really the translation impact of foreign exchange as opposed to what I’ll call the product cost or the transaction impact of foreign exchange was driven very heavily by the forward contracts that we’ve entered in to to hedge forward inventory purchases. The net impact of Q2 of that effect when you take in to account the contracts that mature and the contracts that matured in the quarter are entered in to six to nine months prior to the actual quarter. But the net impact of fx translation and transaction in Q2 was a $0.01 a share negative in the quarter. So, that compared to I think about $0.015 in Q1 so on a year-to-date basis fx in total we’re about flat. The biggest negative impact year-over-year for the full year is going to be driven by the second half of the year, the maturation of the forward contracts that again, as I mentioned in the prepared remarks, that were entered in to this year before the dollar more recently weakened and were entered in to the prior year before the dollar significantly strengthened in the Q3/Q4 time period. I knew there would be questions regarding the $0.11 to $0.14 impact given what the actual fx impact was in Q2 so we wanted to clarify it’s mainly being driven by the timing of when the contracts were entered in to. The dollar weakened and strengthened so rapidly last year and this year respectively that the timing of the contracts entered in to versus the contracts maturing is having a big kind of effect of fx on the reported results or projected results as well. Christopher Svezia – Susquehanna Financial Group: With regard to the direct consumer piece of the business, you mentioned improving trends in the second quarter, can you maybe just talk about of the 90 or so stores that you company own, can you give us the comp number or give us any parameters about what dynamics occurred? What the magnitude of the shift was in terms of the improvement?

Our retail management team took some actions earlier this year to really improve the performance of our owned stores, 90 some stores here primarily in the United States such as going narrow and deep on key product assortments. Trying not to be out of stock when that consumer walks through the door and they want some core product, that had a significant impact. In addition, we’re seeing an overall good response to our product development efforts and innovation by virtually all of our brands and [inaudible] are featured in our owned stores. We also made some improvements to our eCommerce websites to improve the timing and make those sites even easier to use so it was really a combination of various things including putting some full price Merrell product in our Merrell Value Outlet stores that has an impact on our performance. So all of that effort the last four to six months came together it seemed in mid May and we started about mid May to significantly out performer the FDRA retailer index. As you know, that index on a comp store basis is down about 5% to 6% for the year which is probably the toughest year the US footwear industry has experienced in at least several decades that I’ve been around. We’re very happy about the consumer response to our product and really our outperformance which truly started about mid quarter for us. Christopher Svezia – Susquehanna Financial Group: Do the comp trends look like it will turn positive?

I think for our fiscal stores, bricks and mortar stores we had a low single digit comp store decrease for the quarter which was significantly better than FDRA and when I look at the April, May and June numbers that were just out recently most of the other retail players.

That would be for the full quarter Chris and really as Blake indicated, we saw a nice turnaround in mid May so the latter part of the quarter we saw a better improvement than the -2.2% comp store sales decline.

Your next question comes from Kate Mcshane – Citi. Kate Mcshane – Citi: I was wondering if you could give a little more color on the reason for the increase in guidance today? And, how much of it is from an improved currency outlook?

Well, we said with our initial guidance that we were expecting a $0.15 per share negative fx impact and we’re at $0.11 to $0.14 share now so not much of the increase in guidance is related to a change in the fx outlook it’s really we’ve over delivered versus our internal plan for the first two quarters of the year. We have plans to continue to be vigilant and disciplined on the operating expense side, we are pleased with the way Chaco is being integrated and we’re pleased with the performance, particularly in Q2 for Chaco. All those things kind of come together and converge to cause us to be a little more optimistic regarding the full year. Obviously, as you get a couple of quarters under your belt, like any well run company, we had some reserves and cushions in our internal operating plan that we presented to ourselves as well as our board of directors as well as what influence our communications to the outside world. As you get six months in to the fiscal year and you perform according to plan you get a little more confident regarding the back half of the year. Kate Mcshane – Citi: Can you talk about the strength of the Merrell brand? How much of the double digit increase is a result of new distribution that may have happened during the quarter and how much would you think is from market share gains? And, are you still seeing retailers focus on the top three or five brands at the expense of tertiary brands at retail?

Let me take the last part of your question first Kate, I think retailers in general have pared down the number of brands they’re carrying in their stores. They are looking to purchase closer to need and so they naturally have narrowed their choices to the strongest brands in their portfolio and as you know, over the last seven, eight or nine years Merrell has been one of the strongest performing brands, especially here in the United States. The Merrell increase in the quarter really didn’t come from new doors and distribution for the most part, it just came from excellent sell through primarily at our existing space. I think sporting goods and some other channels performed a little bit better than the outdoor specialty so sporting goods and independents versus outdoor specialty and maybe department stores which remained pretty conservative. Those channels performed better but the Merrell performance line, that’s their out venture segment of their line had another outstanding quarter and they’re clearly the dominate player in that category. The sales performance in the quarter for Merrell was really spread across men’s and women’s. Women’s land sandals, performance product and the same for men.

Your next question comes from Diana Katz – Lazard Capital. Diana Katz – Lazard Capital: I was wondering if you could comment on your decision to move some non-core excess inventory, what was the dollar amount of that inventory moved and the impact on gross margins? And, which brands that was from? Also, you previously stated you expect inventory down year-over-year and flat gross margins, do you still expect that?

The closeout inventory in the quarter, we have closeout sales every quarter Diana as I am sure you can appreciate. We called it out in the discussion on gross margin because the closeout sales in the quarter were a few million more this year than in last year’s Q2. It was across the entire brand portfolio and in addition to having a higher percentage of our revenue in the form of closeout sales, the gross margin we earned on closeout sales this quarter was a little bit less than the margin on closeout sales in the prior quarter so that was a contributor to the 60 basis point decline and constant currency gross margin was not anywhere as close as the higher product cost but it was a factor in that. So, that was what drove that is the desire to manage out inventory that was otherwise classified as dead inventory so the gross margins on that were very low. We are still expecting full year flattish gross margins. We expect there to be significant gross margin expansion in the second half of the year so that is still embedded in the full year forecast.

Your next question comes from Mitch Kummetz – Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc. Mitch Kummetz – Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: I just wanted to follow up on Kate’s question about Merrell because in the quarter I guess your sales were down almost 8%, last quarter down a little over 11% so about a four point improvement Q2 versus Q1 but then the Merrell business I think Blake you said it was up low double digit constant dollars, last quarter I think it was down low single digits in constant dollars so a much bigger swing in that business sequentially from Q1 to Q2. Is that a function of Q1 being hurt by weak pre-books and Q2 really benefitting from strong reorders or how should we think about that significant sequential improvement in the Merrell business.

Mitch, let me clarify one thing, Blake said that the Outdoor Group was up on a constant currency basis not the Merrell brand. Mitch Kummetz – Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: Right.

Mitch, from a macro standpoint I think people frankly, just kind of retailers and everybody were feeling their way in to the first quarter and as time has progressed people have gotten use to operating in this type of environment so you’re seeing maybe a more, I’m not sure I would call this a more normal trading environment but, certainly people are learning how to operate, the good operators, in this type of environment. Merrell had a good Q2, maybe some of their Q1 performance was impacted by retailers being ultra conservative but as you know retailers need to pay their bills with their gross margin dollars as well and they have to have the products that the consumers demand so I think there was some of that involved in our Q2 Merrell performance. Mitch Kummetz – Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: Then Don help me out with the full year sales guidance because you guys beat your internal sales expectations on the second quarter and yet the full year sales guidance particularly on a constant dollar basis is coming in a little bit. Is that a function of more of the business shifting to at once so you have less visibility so you’re being more conservative with your back half outlook or is there something else that you’re seeing that causes you to take down the full year guidance in constant dollars even with the Q2 beat?

Without question we have less visibility in to the second half of the year than we would in a normal year. Now, last year we had visibility that we thought was good and as it turns out it really wasn’t that good because of all the order cancellations that came in in the last half of the year. When we build our operating plans for the year by quarter, we do it by period but when we roll it up by quarter back in the beginning of the year, we like many companies Mitch, were expecting to have a very, very tough Q1, a little bit less tough Q2, a little bit better Q3 and kind of hopefully cycle through and get our head above water in Q4. Again, that was probably pretty consistent across a range of companies. We did have a tough Q1, maybe not as bad as we had projected, we had a little bit better Q2. The outlook now for the back half of the year, the economic recovery that we thought would kind of be picking up steam in late Q3 and Q4 by all accounts appears it is going to be a little bit delayed from that. Europe remains very, very tough from a trading standpoint and we just have a more cautious and conservative outlook on the second half of the year based on where we stand today than we did when we developed the initial plan back in the January time period. Mitch Kummetz – Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: If I may just one quick last question, on the Wolverine group I don’t know if you mentioned it or maybe I missed it what were the sales for the quarter? I assume they were down but were they down double digits in constant dollars?

In constant dollars they were down overall for the group and that includes Bates and high test. They were down in the mid teens in constant dollars but as you know, most of the Wolverine group is US based and US centric, probably most of any of our branded groups.

With a big part of that decline Mitch is really the timing of Bates business. We still feel full year Bates is going to have a decent year but the business is pretty unpredictable based on Department of Defense orders so a large part of that decline in the quarter – it’s kind of hard to assess the Bates business quarter-by-quarter and if it has an impact on the entire Wolverine footwear group that causes a similar challenge there.

Your next question comes from Sam Poser – Sterne, Agee & Leach. Sam Poser – Sterne, Agee & Leach: I’ve got a few questions, number one can you give us the actual reported dollars by segment outdoor and the different groups please?

Hang on one second, I have the percentage changes and the dollar changes, I’ll give you the dollars. Are you interested in the dollars themselves or the percent change? Sam Poser – Sterne, Agee & Leach: No, the dollars themselves.

For Hush Puppies Company, $27.1 million, for Wolverine Footwear Group $49.7 million, the Outdoor Group $92.9 million, Heritage Brands Group $45.1 million and the other would be right at $30 million. Sam Poser – Sterne, Agee & Leach: Then also do you guys factor your receivables?

No. Sam Poser – Sterne, Agee & Leach: How do you seeing that being a potential advantage to you this year given the problems that CIT looks like they’re having right now?

We have no exposure.

Again, our DSOs were down about a day at the end of the second quarter compared to the prior year Sam which, in this environment, I think is quite a testament to the effort being extended on the part of the company. We feel very good about where we are from a working capital standpoint and even better about where we’re projected to be by the end of the year. Sam Poser – Sterne, Agee & Leach: Two other quick questions, what do you see the fx gross margin impact in the back half of the year?

Well, it’s going to be negative. If on a year-to-date basis we’re about flat from an fx standpoint and we’re projecting $0.11 to $0.14 of fx full year drag, most of that is going to be in the cost of sales area so it’s going to impact our gross margin. Again, I like to talk about constant currency gross margin so I’d rather adjust our reported revenue for fx and adjusted our reported cost of sales for fx to get a constant currency gross profit. Sam Poser – Sterne, Agee & Leach: So your gross margin on a constant currency basis is what you’re looking at to be flat with the previous year.

No, we’re talking reported gross margin to be flat with the prior year excluding restructuring charges.

I think the other factor Sam you have to take in to account is our gross margin in the first half was impacted by negotiated prices that were significantly higher for product in first half that were negotiated in 2008. We’ve also negotiated very hard on product prices for the second half of this year and have had some pretty significant decreases so you’ll see that impacting gross margin as well, fx aside, in the back half of this year.

For the first half of this year our average product cost increase was in the high single digits up to double digits depending on the brand and for the second half of the year we’re looking at low single digits, maybe in to low middle single digits depending on the brand in terms of year-over-year product cost increases. We studied the margin quite closely Sam, we feel confident and comfortable that full year flat gross margin reported adjusted only for restructuring charges is achievable. Sam Poser – Sterne, Agee & Leach: Then one last question, when you talked about your backlog being of great quality does that imply that basically the backlog is down but you feel very confident that you’re going to shift everything that you’ve got?

Maybe not great quantity but great quality. Sam Poser – Sterne, Agee & Leach: That would imply that the backlog is down but you feel comfortable with everything you’ve got?

Correct. That’s correct. I mean, it’s simply given what happened in Q3 and Q4 last year in the cancellation area, it’s just not an apples-to-apples comparison anymore and we have that experience under our belt with respect to Q1 and Q2. Sam Poser – Sterne, Agee & Leach: To what degree is the backlog down on a year-over-year basis given that exception?

On a reported basis it’s down mid teens but when you adjust for foreign exchange, adjust for the businesses we exited previously, adjust for the timing of the Bates business and when you look at the excessive cancellations that we had in the last half of last year, and we study this quite hard to look at what the cancellation rate was versus our historical average and what we expect it to be this year, the backlog was down mid single digits.

Your next question comes from Jeff Mintz – Wedbush Morgan Securities, Inc. Jeff Mintz – Wedbush Morgan Securities, Inc.: I guess Don a follow up on the marketing and ad expense, you said there was a shift in timing in to the second quarter, what’s kind of the overall plan for that for the year? Is it planned down from last year and have you made any adjustments to the plan as we’ve gone through the first two quarters?

We’re very mindful of continuing to invest in the brands Jeff, not just in product design and development but also in the advertising and marketing spend. We are projecting a modest full year decline in that area but the decline would be less than in any other areas of operating expenses. As we continue to reevaluate full year plans, there may be a slight adjustment to that versus the original expectation for the year but nothing significant. Jeff Mintz – Wedbush Morgan Securities, Inc.: Don have you found that you’re kind of getting more impressions for your advertising dollar based on what’s going on in the advertising world?

I would say overall absolutely.

We don’t do a lot of direct to consumer advertising where I think that issue would be probably more prevalent but, I think the general answer to your question is yes.

And frankly, we continue to invest in avenues that get us closer to the consumer, our eCommerce site, our stores, the stores of our international partners around the world, we’re focused on those venues. Whatever drop that Don this year referred to is what I would probably call soft marketing dollar show costs and some of those items. Jeff Mintz – Wedbush Morgan Securities, Inc.: Blake, could you just comment a little bit on the Outdoor Group international business particularly the Merrell business in the quarter?

The Outdoor Group and all of our international businesses, there’s a clear advantage to the company being in 180 countries around the world. We’ve got some countries that are struggling right now yet we also have the advantage of some countries that are rolling along just fine. So, we still think we’re getting and taking market share around the world especially some of the smaller competitors and smaller brands just don’t have the infrastructure or financial wherewithal to stay present in a number of these markets. We’re there and we’ve been there for decades and we’re there to stay so that’s helping us a little bit on the competitor side.

Your next question comes from Elizabeth Montgomery – Longbow Research. Elizabeth Montgomery – Longbow Research: Most of my questions were already answered but I wondered if you could talk about Chaco and kind of how much it contributed to the Outdoor Group’s growth in the quarter? Then, just a clarification, the Merrell business I think in the press release Blake you said the Merrell business in the US was up double digits?

Correct. Elizabeth Montgomery – Longbow Research: Is that Merrell or is that just Outdoor?

That’s Merrell. The reference in the release is Merrell US business which we were obviously very happy about. With respect to Chaco, Chaco sales in the quarter were around $8 million and we were very, very pleased with that. That’s really a testament to our operations team and brand team that took that brand on really at the front of the season and in mid season and was able to perform and meet our retailers expectations. Chaco has been a bit of a pleasant surprise, the loyalty to that brand is very, very strong. Elizabeth Montgomery – Longbow Research: And I would imagine that Q2 is a big quarter for Chaco so we might not see quite that much?

Absolutely Q2 would probably be the biggest quarter this year.

Your last question comes from Jeff Blaeser – Morgan Joseph & Co., Inc. Jeff Blaeser – Morgan Joseph & Co., Inc.: I just wanted to touch back on the at once order trends that you mentioned earlier, how that influences your inventory decisions, how that could influence inventory and on the other side, the flip side, I’m guessing that they’re asking you for something I’m guessing you’re getting something back. What kind of impact does that have on your prices and your margins?

Well, to your point, the gross margin we earn on at once orders is clearly higher than it is on future orders. A lot of the future orders are large orders from large customers that would have volume discounts already built in to them but, we do charge more for an at once order that we’re shipping out of our warehouse and we earn a higher margin on that. Jeff Blaeser – Morgan Joseph & Co., Inc.: Will the increase at the at once impact your decisions on inventories?

Actually, that’s something we’ve had a lot of discussions about because in normal times we’re trying to obviously manage our inventory down. We made great progress in the quarter on managing inventories however, we’re also mindful of the need to have inventory on hand given the changing trends that we talked about during the prepared remarks about having inventory on hand, the right inventory to fill at once orders because you run the risk of managing your inventories down so low that your order fill rate drops precipitously and you’re missing a lot of at once business that you would otherwise have. When you look at our strong balance sheet and what it costs us on our revolver which is a very low LIBOR plus 40 basis points, the current cost on the revolver is about 70 basis points all in, the carrying cost of inventory the true carrying cost is very low as long as it’s the right inventory that you feel you can sell at full gross margin or something close to that. So, that’s something we’re continuing to work through on a brand-by-brand operating group by operating group basis. Jeff Blaeser – Morgan Joseph & Co., Inc.: Could you give us an order of magnitude of the positive impact on margins that you saw in the second quarter from that trend?

I don’t have a number in front of me Jeff. We can look at it and maybe circle back with you.

At this time I would like to turn the call back over to Ms. Christi Cowdin.

On behalf of Wolverine World Wide I would like to thank you all for joining us today and as a reminder our conference call replay is available on our website at www.WolverineWorldWide.com. The replay will be available through Wednesday, July 29, 2009. Thank you and have a great day.

This concludes the teleconference. You may now disconnect your lines.