Thanks, Chris. Good day, everyone. First, let’s take a look at the capital structure on slide five. At the recent share price of $0.90 and with approximately 27.6 million shares outstanding, our market capitalization stands at $24.8 million. During calendar quarter -- third quarter, our stock performance remained steady. However, on October 2nd, an analyst report on chemicals outlook and a negative outlook on uranium market impacted all uranium equities from a price of $1.44 on September 29, WWR’s price has dropped to its current price of $0.90.The average daily trading liquidity however remains strong with the trailing three months average volume of approximately 330,000 shares per day. Now, turning to the financial summary on slide six for Q3 results, we want to highlight the improved financial strength of WWR. Our cash position at October 31, 2017 was approximately $6.1 million; and most importantly, we have no long-term debt. Our working capital of $8.2 million at September 30, 2017 along with the financing facilities we’ve put in place, are expected to fund our business activities through 2018. As noted in the last quarter’s conference call, we retired the original $8 million convertible loan with Resource Capital Funds or RCF with a final cash payment of $5.5 million during the first quarter of 2017. In July 2017, we terminated a shareholders’ agreement with RCF which had provided RCF with equity participation rights and board representation rights. Once again, we note that the retirement of this loan saves us $800,000 per year in interest payments to RCF. Most importantly, that $800,000 is half of our budgeted lithium exploration and drilling budget for 2018, and will now be going into the ground. Net cash used in operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was approximately $8.9 million compared to $9.8 million used during the same period of 2016. The $900,000 year over year reduction primarily due to a decrease in general and administrative costs and interest expense and an increase in interest income. During the third quarter, we continued to pare down our G&A expenses. As a result of this work, our G&A expense for Q3 2017 was 10% lower than the equivalent quarter in 2016. Expenditures for mineral property expenses were higher by 27% or approximately $300,000; that was due to cost incurred in the Phase 1 exploration drilling at the Columbus Basin Project. Finally, our net loss for the quarter was approximately $3 million versus a loss of approximately $3.7 million in the third quarter of 2016. The $700,000 decrease was primarily due to the decrease in interest expense. And with that, I’ll turn it back to you, Chris.