Good afternoon and welcome to the Western Union Third Quarter 2014 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mike Salop, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Laura and good afternoon everyone. On today's call Hikmet Ersek, Western Union's President and Chief Executive Officer, and Raj Agrawal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, will discuss the company's third quarter 2014 results, and then we will take your questions. And we expect today's call to last about 45 minutes. The slides that accompany this call and webcast can be found at westernunion.com under the Investor Relations tab and will remain available after the call. Additional operational statistics have been provided in supplemental tables with our press release. Today's call is being recorded and our comments include forward-looking statements. Please refer to the cautionary language in the earnings release and in Western Union's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission including the 2013 Form 10-K for additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. During the call, we will discuss some items that do not conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We have reconciled those items to the most comparable GAAP measures on our website, westernunion.com, under the Investor Relations section. All statements made by Western Union officers on this call are the property of The Western Union Company and subject to copyright protection. Other than the replay noted in our press release, Western Union has not authorized and disclaims responsibility for any recording, replay or distribution of any transcription of this call. I would now like to turn the call over to Hikmet Ersek.

Thank you, Mike and good afternoon everyone. I am pleased with the results we delivered in the third quarter. Our transformational strategy and innovation actions that we put in place a couple of years ago are delivering good results. In the quarter, we continued to make progress strengthening our consumer money transfer business. We returned to growth in Business Solutions and tight cost management across the company helped us deliver a strong increase in profitability. We also returned almost $190 million to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases in the quarter, bringing the total to nearly $650 million returned in the first 9 months of the year. In the third quarter, our revenues increased 2%, or 5% in constant currency terms. Our consumer money transfer business drove the growth with revenue increasing 2% or 4% constant currency. Each of our geographic regions delivered constant currency growth in the quarter and U.S. outbound continued to be a strong point. Westernunion.com again provided good growth as money transfer revenues increased 21% on transaction growth of 34%, also led by strong growth from U.S. outbound. Adjusted return from traveling through Europe and Asia where I had great meetings regarding our global opportunities with business partners, customers and employees. We are all pleased with the current business performance and excited about the future. While there are certainly many concerns about the global economy and potential impact of geopolitical tensions, our results in Europe and in the Middle East remain positive in the quarter. As our previous pricing and other strategic actions in Europe and in Russia have helped drive good results. Strategically, we are continuing to develop our money transfer network and offer, in an innovative way, more choice and convenience to our customers. Money transfers via ATMs and other types of self-service terminals…

Thank you, Hikmet. Total revenue in the third quarter was approximately $1.4 billion, an increase of 2%, or 5% on a constant currency basis, compared to the prior year. Electronic channels revenue increased 21% in the quarter and represented 6% of total company revenue. In the Consumer-to-Consumer segment, revenue increased 2%, or 4% on a constant currency basis, while transactions increased 5%. Western Union's C2C cross-border principal also increased 5% in the third quarter on both a reported and constant currency basis. Principal per transaction was flat compared to the prior year period both as reported and in constant currency. The spread between the C2C transaction and revenue growth in the quarter was 3 percentage points, including a negative 2% impact from currency. The impact of net price decreases was 1%, while mix had minimal impact in the quarter overall. We believe the market has shown fairly stable pricing recently. We have made some price adjustments, both reductions and increases, in various quarters around the world, but we continue to expect our pricing actions for the remainder of the year to be modest. Turning to the regions. In the Europe and CIS region, revenue increased 1% year-over-year including a negative 2% impact from currency, while transactions increased 10%. Revenue benefited from good performance in Germany and Turkey. The differential between transaction and revenue growth in the region was primarily driven by pricing and mix, including the impact of strong transaction growth from Russia which typically generates lower revenue per transaction than the European average. North America revenue grew 2% in the quarter while transactions increased 3%. U.S. outbound delivered strong growth again in the quarter and Mexico revenue increased 8% on transaction growth of 6%. Domestic money transfer revenue declined 2%, while transactions grew 4% in the quarter. Declines in…

[Operator Instructions] And our first question will come from Darrin Peller of Barclays.

Look, good execution on the cost side, on the margin side in particular. Just wanted to hit on that for a moment because the -- I guess, number one, it seems like you're taking the costs out as you promised, and what kind of extrapolation should we have for that going forward? Is this sustainable just given that we -- I guess we would have thought the margin extrapolation into the fourth quarter would lead to potentially a higher EPS guide than you did, as much as it was nice to see the raise. So just can you give us a little color on what really drove the margin improvement? Specifically what costs and how sustainable that is first?

Sure. Darrin this is Raj. As we came into the year, we knew that we had some cost pressures in various areas, the compliance costs, commission rates and we also wanted to invest money back in the business. And given that we've been managing our costs pretty tightly, and that's really what we saw here in the third quarter. As we've always said, we believe that as we get revenue growth, we'll get expansion on our profitability. So that's what we saw in the third quarter. As we go into the fourth quarter, we really have planned for some additional investments. First, we expect compliance cost to be a little bit higher in the fourth quarter. Year-to-date, we've run at about 3%. For the year, we expect approximately 3.5%. It could be a little bit lower than that, but approximately 3.5%. And so that's one item. The other item is focused on cost savings initiatives. As we've done in past years, we believe there is more opportunity to optimize our cost structure and so we are putting those plans together. And to the extent that there's something material there, we'll talk to you more about it next year. And then lastly, we want to make some additional investments in certain areas of our business to drive future growth and productivity overall. So that's really why we've given the outlook that we have and we're comfortable with that at this stage.

Okay. And then, I guess from a modeling standpoint, is that something we can really base our outlook on in terms of the level of cost, sort of the average of the third and fourth quarter would be a good way to look at it perhaps?

We've given -- we believe that we'll be at about 20% for the year in terms of margin. So that's how you should model it.

Yes, okay. All right, just a quick turning to the B2B business. It was definitely nice to see that show positive inflection. Just can you give us a little more color on what drove that? And again, just how sustainable that is?

Sure, sure. We're pleased with the return to growth there. We grew 4%, or 3% on a constant currency basis. In the quarter itself, if I could just give you a little bit of color, in the first 2 months of the quarter, we didn't see much volatility. But in the last month of the quarter, we did see some volatility return. And as we've said before, in the very short term, the business is impacted by volatility so that helped the results a little bit. Over the long term, we still believe that global trade growth will be a key driver of the business along with all the other things that the business is doing. We were pleased with the current results.

Yes, also the payments -- Darrin, the payments part is coming pretty good. Remember we talked about that, about the university payments, student payments, these parts are all coming out so good. That helps.

All right. Just last question -- that's great to hear. Just last question and I'll turn it back to the queue. On the capital allocation strategy, you guys have done a lot for shareholders this year. I think, like you said, over $600 million returned. When we think about the amount of generated cash internationally, can you just talk to us about the potential thoughts you and the board have around how you manage cash going forward? Is it still going to end up being the same strategy of looking for international deals with international cash? Or can we expect to see some changes towards more of a use for domestic purposes? And even if there's some tax changes that go with it, just any thoughts around that, and I appreciate it.

Sure. Darrin, our capital allocation policies haven't changed. We've been strong returners of capital for many years and that's, again, the case this year. We pay a very high dividend now. It's very much in line with market, but it's been increased a lot in the last few years and I would expect us to continue to focus on paying out a good dividend level. Stock buyback, we believe that we'll continue to have opportunities to do more stock buyback in the next few years as we unlock cash for domestic purposes. And to the extent that there are other opportunities to look at, it could be smaller acquisitions, it could be technology plays that give us some other capabilities. We'll look at that, but that's not our top priority right now. So our capital allocation policies, I would say, really haven't changed.

The next question comes from Tien-tsin Huang of JPMorgan. Tien-tsin Huang - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: I wanted to ask just on the -- to clarify on the compliance then, I guess the implied guidance in the fourth quarter would be up to 5% of revenue on compliance. So I'm just curious, is that a number we should assume, if that's the case, for 2015 as well? Or is it just a onetime bump-up for year end? I'm just trying to understand that a little bit better.

Yes. Tien-tsin, I would say it's more of the latter. We've had some programs that are completing in the fourth quarter and that's the final push there. We also have been hiring people during the course of the year and we'll see more of a full impact from that in the fourth quarter. But as we have seen some efficiencies this year, we're hopeful that some of those will carry into next year as well. And we're just putting the detailed plans together, but we're happy with the overall results. We've been able to accomplish our key objectives in the compliance side and we've also done it more efficiently.

I wouldn't read too much on the Q4 on that, Tien-tsin, because remember we start to hire people in the beginning of the year and you'll see that's why it's a little bit higher in the Q4. Tien-tsin Huang - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: Okay. And I was just curious, maybe hopefully the 3.5%, 4% is sort of a better guide for 2015. Is that fair?

Yes, I would just say that we're still doing some work to optimize that as much as we can. I wouldn't see it being higher than that range, but we are still working to get specific there. Tien-tsin Huang - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: Understand that caveat. So just 2 more. Just on the pricing side, I'm glad to hear that it's been pretty stable or unsurprising. Is the competitive landscape changing and driving that? What sort of the, pricing being modest, what's driving that in your opinion?

Tien-tsin, as you know that has been stable for over last few quarters. We are pleased with our business performance. As you recall, 2 years ago we did some strategic action on 25% of our business and that's paying back. In our business, we are in 16,000 corridors, 200 countries. We do adapt our prices to the market environment and that has not changed. I think the competitive environment -- we are competing very well with our existing values, existing brand, existing networks. So I think I'm pleased with the environment currently. Tien-tsin Huang - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: No, glad to hear. Glad to hear. Last one, I promise. Domestic business, how did that come in versus planned? I saw on the Q that looked like the high-band stuff had some impact I'm guessing maybe from Walmart? Can you elaborate on domestic?

No, I don't see any competitive disadvantage here. Our transactions are -- we are pleased with our plan. Our transaction grew about 4% in Q3. Especially in the lower bands, the transactions are going good, the Mobile Money Transfer is doing good. So 50,000 locations in the U.S. helps, right? People are sending money fast [ph] in good ways, so we are pleased with our domestic money transfer business currently.

And Tien-tsin, as you'll recall, we -- our higher bands over the last several quarters have kind of been trending down and lower bands have been going up. So we haven't really seen a change in that pattern. We'll continue to monitor. Obviously, Walmart's doing a lot of advertising and we'll continue to monitor that. But so far, we really haven't seen an impact from it.

Next, we have a question from Bryan Keane of Deutsche Bank.

With the 21.8% operating margin, was that ahead of your guidance as planned? And if it was, what drove the surprise?

Yes, it was better than we had expected. Again, we've been managing our costs quite tightly and we've been managing -- obviously, we're seeing compliance come in lower than we had expected for the first 9 months of the year. So that's helped a bit and that continued in the third quarter. But on our discretionary expenses, we've also been just managing those as efficiently as possible and just -- go ahead.

The team is executing, Bryan, really, the team is executing. We have a plan. The team is executing and the compliance cost came lower than we expected, and we are executing in an efficient way that helped a lot.

So fourth quarter, though, the margin will come out less than kind of most people expected. It feels like, though, maybe you're just pulling forward some expense just to get it into the fourth quarter but maybe doing some extra things in the quarter and on expense side that you might not have planned originally. Is that fair?

Not necessarily. There is some timing of expenses, but we're -- compliance is something that will step up in the fourth quarter. We have various cost initiatives that we want to try to achieve in the fourth quarter because we think there is more opportunity there. And we want to invest in the business to drive growth, whether it's digital-oriented innovation or other areas like cybersecurity and just overall productivity for the business, that's really where we want to put the money in. We're going to invest as smartly as we've always done and we believe there's opportunity there.

Yes, I think also digital is still the big investment, I believe, on mobile, I believe on digital innovation and we're going to continue to invest. Also the cybersecurity is always on our focus area and compliance, obviously, and that some investment will be done in Q4.

But now fourth quarter will be materially different or lower than the other 3 quarters, but there shouldn't be any seasonally anything going on in the third quarter that causes that impact?

No, not necessarily. I mean, we should see pretty stable revenue trends and it's really about these areas that we want to spend more money on and it's really a proactive move on our part to go after these specific areas.

And then just finally for me, commission rates, can you talk about how they are looking compared to plan and kind of as we go forward into next year? Or do we have a handle on that or those continue to escalate?

It's too early to say for next year. But the commission rates on the retail side are playing out as we had expected. We expected a little bit of a bump-up in those costs and that's what we're seeing. But they're pretty well under control, I would say. And as the mix of our business changes, we'll be able to bring down overall distribution costs, but I would say that they're not getting away from us, if I can say it that way. They're pretty well under control.

The next question will come from Smitti Srethapramote of Morgan Stanley.

It looks like transaction and revenue growth in digital decelerated quite a bit sequentially in 3Q. Can you talk about what led to the slowdown in transactions? And also what kind of initiatives you guys have in place to sort of try to reaccelerate that growth rates over the next couple of quarters?

Yes, Smitti, you're talking about westernunion.com digital business?

Yes, yes, yes, westernunion.com.

Sure. Well, Smitti, I think we are pleased with our westernunion.com and our digital business. If you look at that 34% transaction growth, quite impressive, and 21% revenue growth, I think we are continuing to expand. We are in 20 -- over 20 countries with our Dot.com. But also our existing business where we have been longer in U.S. outbound is working very well. And that had a 34% or something like that...

32% U.S. outbound, yes.

32% transaction growth from the U.S. outbound. So I am pleased with current environment. And next is that can we expand this westernunion.com digital business to more corridors? Expect taking that to Asia or to other countries is our long-term initiative year.

Got it. And then maybe just to follow up on a different issue. I think you guys have been testing instant ACH over the past couple of months. Just wondering if there's been any -- if there's any update in terms of when you potentially will plan to roll out that product more broadly?

Raj, do you want to take that?

Yes, yes. Smitti, I would just start out by saying that we are going to introduce it more formally in the fourth quarter, but we operate a global business. It's not just from the U.S. We operated segments [ph] in more than 20 markets. We -- we send money, or a lot of customers send money, globally around the world into 200 countries and territories, and now also into 50 markets into a bank account. And we have various bank-like funding capabilities throughout Europe and obviously in the U.S. So today have ACH on a delayed basis and we have been heavily testing instant ACH with several thousand customers. We also have done tens of thousands of transactions there, and we think that'll be another feature that will help the growth in our business but we're doing many other things that are driving the growth in our business. And as we get into the early part of next year, we'll also be more proactive in advertising that to consumers at the front end of the transaction, but we think it will be an additional feature of the many things we're doing to improve the overall customer experience.

The next question is from Sara Gubins of Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

On the compliance front, I'm wondering if you've seen any noticeable differences to how certain governments are approaching compliance requirements?

Well, it's a hot subject. It has been very dynamic in the last 3 years, right, 2 to 3 years. And operating in 200 countries, every government has their own environment and we -- that's one of -- that's why we are investing about 3.5% of our revenue in the compliance. And I would say that it's a dynamic environment. I wouldn't say that it changed the last 6 months than it was earlier before 6 months, but it's a dynamic environment and we are upgrading our compliance part there and investing actually. I see that as investment because I really believe long term it's a competitive advantage. It puts us in a place we have the regulatory license in 200 countries, we can operate and we do compliance in 200 countries, we do the settlement and we pay out in 121 countries -- currencies, puts us really in a way that we can be very active in the cross-border and cross-currency money transfer.

Great. And then following about the online discussion. How are you thinking about pricing going forward for online? Do you see that as continuing to change much? Are you comfortable with the current structure?

I'm quite comfortable in the current structure and the environment where we operate. We do operate in 20 countries and -- to 200 countries so that gives us many, many corridors. We adapt our prices corridor by corridor, as you know, Sara, and band by band. I'm quite comfortable with our current pricing structure. And still 80% of our customers are new to our network. They like our network, they like that we can tell to customers that you can send money from Canada immediately and payout in Vietnam immediately or pay out in Uganda or payout in Morocco. That's what we do and we are satisfied with our current products and pricing.

Great. And then just last question on Europe. Volumes continue to improve in spite of pretty difficult comparisons. Could you give us some more detail about what you're seeing in the region?

Sure.

Go ahead, Raj. I'm listening.

Yes, Sara, the -- in Europe, we saw good contributions from various parts of Europe. Germany and Turkey, in particular, helped the growth there. We also saw a very good transaction growth in Russia. And so that drove some of the higher transaction growth that we're seeing there. So overall, pretty stable trends. We have some negative FX impact that drove the revenue down a little bit further. But overall, pretty good results.

Our customers are quite resilient despite some uncertainty in the global economy. Sometimes they use lower RPTs, but -- lower principal amount. But I would say that we are very pleased with our performance in Europe.

The next question -- sorry the next question will come from Jason Kupferberg of Jefferies.

I wanted to pick up on the comment you made earlier that I think Q4, you're going to make some investments around some new cost savings initiatives. So how should we think about the incremental OpEx savings that we should be considering on top of the $45 million you're expecting this year? So in the context of 2015, how much incremental could we see?

Yes, Jason, there are 3 things that are happening in the fourth quarter. First, compliance costs are increasing, so that's just part of our plan to put the right processes in place. And then we are also spending money to drive further growth in the business in some key areas as we mentioned. And then the last area, which is an area that we're still putting all the details together on, are our cost savings initiatives to drive further growth. And I would just say, right now we're at an early stage of that planning process. But to the extent that, that's a material number, then we'll give you more color around that next year when we give our outlook.

Okay. So I mean, I guess, if you're taking out some amount of costs next year and if revenue growth continues to trend positively next year, is there any reason conceptually that margins shouldn't be up year-over-year in 2015 versus 2014?

Jason, to be fair, we don't give '15 guidance, as you know. But I could say that our business model is based on revenue growth. If revenue growth -- our variable costs are higher than our fixed costs, 65% to 35% ratio, right, so it should help, of course, long term on the margins. But I would say that we are very much focused also in Q4 to have productivity actions, optimize our business, but there are some investments also required. As I said earlier, I'm excited about digital, I'm excited about mobile, I'm excited about compliance investments and that gives us a competitive -- long-term competitive advantage and that helps us. So we're going to continue to invest there. And so long term, when revenue picks up, that should help, obviously. Our goal was always grow -- profitable growth.

Right. And just last question, can you give us a sense of where you think -- in absolute dollars, where total digital channel revenue will come in for 2014?

Yes. I mean, in terms of total dollars, it should be in the mid-200, mid-200 range.

Next we have a question from Ashwin Shirvaikar of Citi.

I guess my first question is, as I look at the C2C transaction rate, it's down now to the mid-single-digit level as comps get tougher. I'm thinking, is that the only reason that the C2C transaction is down to the mid-single digits because -- or is there any other reason that I might be missing?

Maybe you can jump in; let me start. Let me try to start Ashwin's question. If you recall, we did pricing actions. They're coming to anniversary, and we were planning that we have a lower transaction growth because pricing actions, they have -- and it's -- I think we completed all of them last quarter, right? And now we're planning with a lower -- that's a big part of that. So I would not -- and I don't see the competition market share loss. I think we are pretty much growing with the market. Our principles are -- we are gaining, in many corridors, market share and we are doing -- overall, we are growing with the market.

No, I meant your own comps not competition. I meant your comps are getting tougher. Just year-over-year comps, that's what I meant. So what I was going for was, is a mid-single-digit transaction growth stay -- sustainable going forward on the C2C side?

We don't give a transaction growth forecast, Ashwin, but just -- if you just take a look at the market growth that's happening, market growth this year, in principle at least, is expected to be around 6%, and our principal growth has been around 7% and we've grown our transactions year-to-date by about 6%. So we'll get a slightly higher transaction growth this year than we did last year, and so I think we're growing in-line with market. And really, now going forward, it's all about how we execute on the various strategies that we have rather than the prices which are almost a couple of years old now.

Right, okay. Understood. And on the cost side, a few questions have been asked about your compliance costs going up in Q4. I guess I just want to step back and ask you, what is it that drives quarter-to-quarter variability fluctuations in this kind of what should really be a long-term compliance spending type of a trajectory?

Good question, Ashwin. I think, as you recall, Ashwin, we did the big investments this year and it took some time to hire the people. And we do unfortu -- we do have to invest there and we have to hire these people. And these are great people where they really call -- have callbacks and they do avoid bad transactions. So that give us some costs into Q4. But going forward, we should have seen -- we should see some stability here. And so you could run your models and we also are planning that stability. But it's evolving environment. If you operate in 200 countries, you have some costs.

Yes. And Ashwin, we've ramped up with some of the people hiring during the year, of course, as Hikmet said, but there's also some variability in terms of outside contractors and services and technology investments. So there are some variations in quarters depending on what projects we're doing, and we just expect an increase in some of that in Q4.

Understood. And if I could squeeze one more in. When I look at wu.com and the pricing on that, there seems to be -- maybe, correct me if I'm wrong, but is there a greater dependence perhaps on FX than on transaction fees when I look at wu.com transactions?

Not necessarily. I mean, we do promotional pricing there and it's -- it can be geared towards the fee side of the equation. But it's really both fee and FX are going to drive that business longer term. For us it's not about the initial transaction that a consumer might do. It's really about the lifetime value of that transaction once they do some business with us.

Also [indiscernible] it depends in which corridor you operate, right? We have a different pricing from Germany, then we have different pricing from the U.S.

Right, right. Just kind of personally more focused on 2 corridors. So that's based on personal experience, I was just asking you.

And the next question will come from Kevin McVeigh of Macquarie.

I wonder if we could get a sense, it sounds like the pricing continues to improve. Is part of that just some competition coming out of the sector given the step-up in compliance, or is it just the overall environment? Just any thoughts on pricing.

Well, generally, I would say we had a very competitive environment. Maybe sometimes you have to write [ph] us green [ph] in the U.S. but we do have also competitors globally in every corridor and we do compete quickly good on that environment. I would say the competition has not disappeared. There are some challenges for smaller competition to comply with the regulatory environment. And we did not see the big changes on our revenue, on our transaction yet, but you know that some of the smaller competitors are having more trouble and to compete in the market because they can't comply with the anti-money laundering requirements.

Got it. And then just -- and I apologize for another question on the compliance, but across that 3%, do we have a sense of how much of that is recurring versus onetime as we think about '15? And as we think about the model, should it be steady-state 3% of revenue or an absolute dollar amount that'll just get -- you'll get leverage with over the course of time?

Kevin, I would just say that there are activities that we are completing this year and they'll fall off the radar screen, but there are other activities that are -- that we have planned for that are going to be added back to the equation for next year. So even though we may have some things that are potentially considered onetime in nature, we're going to have additional activities and things to do next year. This is a global compliance effort, so if we have finished a set of countries this year, we have another set of countries coming at us next year. So it really is -- we really look at it as a percent of revenue cost as we go forward.

Yes. And Kevin, roughly half of our compliance cost relates to compensation, so that would kind of be steady-state. The others can fluctuate.

All right then. The final question will come from George Mihalos of Crédit Suisse. Georgios Mihalos - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: Just had a question looking at the COGS line, you performed very well there this quarter. It came in below sort of the 59% that we've been at for the last several quarters. Did anything change with respect to mix on commissions? Or was there anything that lowered commission as a percentage of overall revenue in the quarter?

Not specifically, George. [indiscernible]

Not specifically. I think, as you know, commissions are we do agreements -- long-term agreements with agents, right? It's -- and it changes quarter-by-quarter or year-by-year better, but not specifically, George. I think we've been quite consistent the last 3 quarters, I guess. Raj?

Yes, we've had higher bank fees and some higher retail commission rates, but we had benefits from various cost savings initiatives and lower integration spend so that's -- some of that is showing up.

But that was offset also by higher interchange fees at our C2B business. As you know, in the -- our bill payments business in the U.S. had a higher interchange fee. So it will look better, but that interchange fees increase also offset that part. Georgios Mihalos - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: Okay, okay, that's helpful. And then just last question. As we think about the agreements you have now with some of your agents, the self-serve kiosks and the like, do those materially change your commission rates there? Meaning, is that a strong lever down the road for lowering commission expense for Western Union?

Well, strategically, long term, I would say, yes, because as we diversify our portfolio, channel portfolio, like retail -- not only from retail to retail also retail to an account, account to account, mobile -- wallets to mobile, if you go [ph], and this is growing very fast, our multichannel alternative channels, they have technically lower commission rates. And it's all about -- it's too small that you can't see it currently impact our P&L. But long term, it should help our commission rates and our diversification of our channels.

And it's a great model for distribution because it really sort of matches the retail with the new way of distributing the product. Particularly as the customer can walk in the store and sort of complete the transaction on their own, and then they walk up to the person at the counter and it's a quick transaction process. So it's more efficient in nature.

Thanks everyone for joining our call today. Hope you have a good afternoon. Thanks.

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.