Welcome to Wintrust Financial Corporation's 2015 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. Following a review of the results by Edward Wehmer, Chief Executive Officer and President; and David Dykstra, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, there will be a formal question-and-answer session. The Company's forward-looking assumptions are detailed in the first quarter's earnings press release and in the Company's most recent Form 10-K on file with the SEC. I’ll now turn the conference call over to Mr. Edward Wehmer.

Good afternoon everybody. Welcome to our first quarter 2015 earnings call. With me as always are, Dave Dykstra; our Chief Operator Officer; Lisa Pattis, our General Counsel and Dave Stoehr, Wintrust’s Chief Financial Officer. We'll do this under our usual format with me giving some general comments on the quarter. Dave Dykstra will get into other income, other expense and some detail and then back to me for some summary thoughts about the future and then time for questions. If you follow us, you know the first quarter was pretty busy one for us. From an earnings standpoint, the quarter is - our first quarter is always the tough one. We had two less days, you have got unpredictable Chicago weather, and higher payroll tax costs, but good loan growth got us through, a good strong mortgage growth got us through. It helped us post increased earnings. Net income little over $39 million, up 13%, earnings per share at $0.76 or 12%, our assets grew $372 million to almost $20.4 billion and that was up 12%. Very good loan growth this quarter across the board, $543 million or 15% growth to almost $15 billion in outstanding loans. Deposits grew $657 million or 12% to almost $17 billion. Of that deposit growth, $261 million of that was DDA growth, showing the continued success of our commercial initiatives and DDA now stands for 22% of all of our deposits. Three years ago it was about 9%, so the deposit base is moving along very nicely. During the quarter we also closed on our acquisition of Delavan, which added - of that loan growth added a $128 million of that loan growth, and $167 million of the deposit growth. Four branches came with that transaction. There are opportunities for some cost saves within…

Thanks, Ed. As usual, I'll briefly touch on some of the more significant non-interest income and non-interest expense sections. Starting with the non-interest income side, our wealth management revenue as Ed indicated totaled $18.1 million for the first quarter of 2015 and this was down slightly from the $18.6 million recorded in the prior quarter, but improved by $1.3 million when compared to the year-ago quarter. Trust and asset management component of this revenue continued its consistent growth increasing to $11.2 million from $10.8 million in the prior quarter. As Ed noted, brokerage revenue can fluctuate based on customer trading activities, and the number of days in the quarter and it showed a slight decline to $6.9 million from the $7.9 million recorded in the fourth quarter of last year. Overall this quarter marked another solid quarter for wealth management unit and we look forward to continued growth. Mortgage banking revenue increased $3.1 million to $27.8 million in the first quarter of 2015, and that’s from $24.7 million recorded in the prior quarter, and was substantially higher than the $16.4 million reported in the first quarter of last year. The Company originated and sold approximately $942 million of mortgage loans in the first quarter, compared to $838 million of mortgage loans originated in the prior quarter and $527 million originated in the year-ago quarter. Now also as longer term rates declined at the end of the fourth quarter and into the first quarter, we experienced a higher level of refinancing activity, which resulted in the mix of volume related to purchase home activity actually declining to the mid 40s percent range from slightly less than 60% in the prior quarter. Moving on, if we look at fees for covered call options, they increased to $4.4 million in the first quarter…

Thanks, Dave. Just to be clear we will close on the second and third quarter. Conversions will take place in the third and fourth quarters for those deals. So it will take a little time to get the -- bringing the expenses out, because which really are subject to getting the conversions done. Hopefully we will be able to find homes for some of the people, we’re going to have to whose positions will be removed, because of that and then we are doing everything we can. This is new to us. We’ve always been really going after geography and these are our first really major cost out moves here. So in the rest of the year it could be a little noisy in terms of as we set up plans in the like to take care of those folks and either find them a new job or get them situated somewhere else. So in summary, I mean, how could you be not be happy? Our stock traded at a 52-week high yesterday. Blackhawks were up one nothing and the Cubs are in first place. How about that? So we are very pleased with that results and our progress in the first quarter, it really positions us well for the rest of the year and beyond. The acquisition pipeline remains very active, our loan pipeline remains very strong, mortgage demand for the near-term continues to be strong. Wealth management continues its steady progress. Our interest rate sensitivity position in the quarter even got better than it was and it was pretty good before and we’re going to continue to work that and make it as good as we -- its available, but you can see Page 20 of the release for the details of that. We also increased our dividend in the first quarter by 10%. So lot of good things going on here. So I said we like where we sit right now and look forward to continuing to execute our plans. We take advantage of what the market is giving us. So with that, we can turn over for some questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Jon Arfstrom of RBC Capital Market. You may begin.

Thanks. Good afternoon.

Hello, Jon.

Hi. Just to start maybe with a question on the pipeline, the numbers that you gave us the $1.4 billion and then the $854 million weighted, that’s up quite a bit compared to last quarter?

No, it’s actually down, Jon.

What’s that?

It’s pretty much even with last quarter.

It is, okay. I had a $700 million quarter, but…

Well probability might be a little bit better, but flow through has been pretty good, but it’s -- last quarter was our highest in a long time and it’s maintained that level in the first quarter.

Okay. And I guess, it gets to -- just a question on the loan growth outlook and expectations. Does it seem like this is the type of sustainable pace you can put up? It was a little bit better than I thought it was going to be for Q1 and I guess I’m just curious if you feel like there was anything specific in this quarter, the sustainable type pace?

Well, yes, we had a $128 million that came over in the acquisition, which was part of that. We also had about a $100 million growth in mortgage warehouse lending, which will move with the mortgage business. So if you take those two out, you’re down to that 350 number maybe and we usually look at about 250 to 300. So it wasn’t that far off from a core standpoint, but the acquisition helped and the mortgage warehouse, we will take if we can get it. So the market is still interesting out there. People have asked previously, you’re going to rope a dope or what’s going on? And I’d tell you there is -- couple of areas where the circuit breakers have tripped, one is in multifamily, especially close to the city Chicago. There is a lot of other people’s money flying into the market and they’re doing things that cap rates that don’t make a lot of sense to us and it trips our own policy and our profitability model. The other place we’re seeing some rationality is clients who are going out and we’ve one deal, you’re not going to believe this one, it was a pretty big deal for rolling stock and it was a five-year deal and we lost 198 five-year non swap. We are not going to play that game either. So it’s very selective right now, but we’re finding -- obviously finding deals and relationships that fit our metrics and it appears that that keeps going. The momentum is very good. Our name recognition with the market is getting in, it was really getting good and now it’s getting increasingly better. And our reputation seems to be -- not mine, but the Company’s, seems to be getting better too. So we’re getting lots of at [advance] [ph] and we won’t be afraid to stop if the market turns on us, but right now we’re doing pretty well.

Okay. That’s helpful. I appreciate some of the color on the potential cost take ups on the deals. I think that helps us. I guess a question I would have is you said there is potentially more activity to come, maybe talk a little bit about that and then what kind of capacity you think you have?

Well, we’re still very active. You never know what’s going to come across the finish line or what isn’t, but we’re pretty active in the area. Capacity issues, because of our structure. These are all moving into different banks. Really the only place where we’ve a capacity problem is the timing to get things converted and on the system. That’s why we are the ones we’re doing is the end of this quarter or the second quarter, beginning of third quarter, wont be converting really till the end of the third and beginning of the fourth quarter. So that’s really where the bottleneck comes in. But from an overall capacity standpoint, we’re going to make hay while the sun shines and continue to look at opportunities, especially as I said cost out opportunities and when if we are at the table and the plate gets too full, we’ve told people in the past, we just can’t deal with you right now and many have said when can you? So we were lucky that we’re concentrating really on the zero to $1 billion deals and those are the ones that are really -- that the market is coming to us right now with and we’ll continue to look at those. All in all they seem like, is it cheaper to do a big deal or three little ones? The three little ones, the execution risk I think is much lower. Our ability to analyze and understand and to simulate is much easier, especially with our structure. So, I’m not concerned about that right now, we had to get them over the finish line, but still it’s pretty active.

Okay, good. Still a holding tenant as you would say? Okay. All right. Thank you guys.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question is from Emlen Harmon of Jefferies. You may begin.

Hey, afternoon guys.

Hi Emlen.

Just a question on the loan yield compression. You noted that the drop in accretable yield was a portion of the compression of the loan yield there which were I think in the non-covered portfolio down about 13 basis points. Which - outside of the accretion -- which portfolios were kind of the biggest driver of the loan yield compression, and kind of what's your outlook for that going forward?

Well, I think what -- probably the way to look at it is, and we don’t give -- actually give out specifics on individual loan categories, but the new loans are still coming in. If we look at our new loan line, they’re still coming in. The 4.0 to 4.10 range and it’s really across the board. We’re seeing compression, there’s lots more people in the commercial real estate side now playing in the market and we’re seeing some of those areas get overheated a little bit. Ed, gave you an example on the commercial side where offering a long-term 1.98. So, I think we’re seeing slight compression across the board. But our new loan volume as we look at it every month is still coming in like I said between 4.0 and 4.10. So I think we’re going to see a little bit of compression there as we go on, but it’s been holding in, it’s just -- the rest of the portfolio was yielding higher. We were at 4.21 before and now we’re down into the 4.08 range. So I feel we see a little bit more compression I think still, but we again don’t think it’s going to be dramatic.

When we pick up the 500 some odd million dollars I mentioned earlier on the three acquisitions we announced, now you’ll mark them to market, but historically we’ve done better, but you never know, it can be up or down. But still it’s kind of -- it’s a little bit of a moving target to give you our thoughts on where it will be throughout the next 18 months.

Got you. Thanks. That’s actually all very helpful. And then, you guys noted the increase and asset sensitivity quarter-over-quarter and that, that was up nicely. Give us a sense of kind of how you’re trying to add to the balance sheet or kind of where you’re focused on growing the balance sheet or changing the balance sheet to affect that increase and asset sensitivity?

Well if you look at the -- if the positive side of things, the increase in demand is certainly helpful from that perspective as that continues to build and grow. We are very, very stingy on fixed rate loans. Any fixed rate loan of size that comes in and is proposed to be non-swapped, it has to be approved by me or Rich Murphy, our chief credit guy. So we – it’s just discipline on the asset side -- on the loan side to not follow the herd in some situations. I mean, there is competition out there that is putting on non-swap fixed rate deals and we don’t really want to do that. So, a lot of it is just – it’s just transactional discipline at the individual bank levels. So, but we’ll continue to look to grow DDA and find other ways to increase our interest rate sensitivity position going forward. It’s going to happen sooner or later, Emlen.

It does. All right, just like Cubs World Series, right?

Hey, who thought the Cubs will be in first place this late in the season, you know.

All right. Thanks guys.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Chris Gratty of KBW. You may begin.

Hi, good afternoon guys.

Hi, Chris.

Dave, on the expenses, first quarter got some seasonal impacts, just a little bit of one-timers in the quarter. How should we be thinking about kind of a starting point for next quarter obviously before the deals come in?

Well, as we always say a lot of this depends on the mortgage banking side, how much commissions are there. We still think the mortgage will be relatively strong for the second quarter and for the buying season. So, but those commissions they all go up and down based upon that volume. So, I think the salaries and employee befits we’ll see a little pick up from the seasonality of payroll taxes, but you might see a little bit more for commissions because we expect the wealth management unit to do better and as the year goes on we generally have a little bit more of incentive comp as we make more, we accrue more. So, that number we have this quarter maybe a reasonable number, might be a little bit, just a little bit high, but again a lot of that depends on the mortgage banking. Occupancy expense is probably going to hang right in there until you get everybody moved over from the other locations which really won't happen until the later half of this quarter for part of it, and the third quarter for the rest. And now if you go down the other ones, there wasn’t a tremendous amount of change in those although once we get covert we do think we’ll get rid of some small amount of other expenses out of the Delavan transaction since we’re post conversion now, but we don’t want to reach line item, I mean that’s the good overview. I think occupancy expense is one until we get moved; we’ll stay a little elevated.

It’s easy to imagine that, as we announced -- the way the accounting rules are, as we announced these deals or as we closed on these deals, Chris that there will some onetime charges that come through, that will be extraordinary this year. But other than that it’s -- we absorbed some additional marketing expense that will be ongoing and -- but we did that in the first quarter. Dave talked about the rent expense. So we’ll see where -- I think Dave’s right on whatever he said.

Okay. Let me just follow it up with one question, as you talk about -- you typically shy away from the efficiency and talk about the overhead ratio. You’re looking at like a 1.6 ratio to date. I think in the past you talked about kind of getting to that 1.5. I guess my question is, with the deals coming on, is that something you can get to you believe this year or is that going to -- I mean you’re not too far off, is that something that maybe needs a little bit higher raise before you can kind of get to that 150 level? Thanks.

Well the higher rates, the 150 level, the higher rates won't do anything, for they’ll help the efficiency ratio. But we won't see the full benefit of these cost of acquisitions really until January next year you can start -- I mean they’ll come in, in the fourth quarter, they will come in piecemeal as we convert and move things out, but it really -- it will all be run at the beginning of the first year, and I think we continue to strive for that, but we won't be afraid to continue to build and grow, to make investments in the future. And we continually look for opportunities to add additional diversification to our lending platform, and we’re not afraid to invest in those types of things. So, we will continue to invest in the business -- if we can continue to put up double digit earnings growth, continue to improve our metrics slow and steady as I talked about which is kind of the plan, we still want to be able to invest to continue to fulfill the entire plan that we have.

Like Ed said, we’ll convert most of these bigger ones in the fourth quarter. So, you won't really see the full impact until you hit the first quarter, but clearly it is an achievable goal we think.

That’s great. The last question, on the acquisition front you guys have used cash in the last couple of deals. You’ve got capital, a little bit of room to capital to lower, what's your thoughts kind of over the next 8 to 12 to 24 months on maybe using stock count transaction, opportunistically raising a little bit of capital to kind of fuel the next leg of the story.

Good question. Each deal is different, some people want cash, some people want stock. We’re kind of partial to the 50-50 approach to keep it attach free. We are in for the people who want it, but it’s really up to the seller as to what type of consideration that they want. There is still a lot of moving parts out there for us. So on the capital side, we’ve kept the -- we’ve kept our capital stat pretty clean as it relates to like preferred stock and things like that. So we will continue to evaluate where we stand on the capital side. Again there’s still lot of moving parts, but whatever we do we will do it in a most shareholder friendly way going forward. So, again I don’t mean to be jumping around on this, but there’s still a lot of moving parts here and we feel that between earnings and if we need something supplemental it will -- we’ll figure it out, but right now there’s a lot going on.

Okay. Thanks a lot for taking the questions.

Thank you. Our next question is from David Long of Raymond James. You may begin.

Good afternoon guys.

Hi, David.

Looking at your deposit mix, obviously a real nice improvement in the favor of core deposits over the last several years. Can you talk about how sticky you think those deposits are in a rising rate environment?

I think the run off for us has occurred, well CDs have run out the door. We rarely considered, number of where a many of our banks are in high net-worth areas and like in Lake Forest people keep 100 in their lawnmower account, but the CDs have, they’ve gone to other places and in the money market accounts what have you maybe they might go back in the CDs, you never know but a lot of it I think has gone into the market just to chase yield. So, I think that the run off for us has actually occurred, and we have had deposits on the CD side run off the door, we’ve been able to replace it with DDA, money markets and savings. Our household growth has been in double digits. So when rates do move up we won't be afraid to go back to CDs. But the question about stickiness, I think that these -- I’m not worried about that aspect, how about you think of commercial GDA, could that be running off. Well that’s going down, that means loan volume would be up and that will be okay too. I think our draw rates were -- they were up about 1% -- a little less than 1% in the fourth quarter, and I think that same number was up about 1% this quarter too. So we’re seeing some additional draws on the lines that we have outstanding. But I pretty much think its pretty sticky stuff because -- and the opportunities to grow a lot of those relationships will exist when you get a little bit of higher rate environment to give some spread to the playing field.

Got you. And then my second question regarding M&A, I thought I heard you say that looking at the next or the future opportunities that you wouldn’t look at geographical expansion and does that mean you’d be expanding your footprint and how far would you go if so?

No, we’re not expanding our banking footprint. We’re still, the Chicago area and Southern Wisconsin, but its -- that’s pretty big area, and there’s still some geographies if you look at our map that we’re not in yet where the deals that have come up recent because our footprint has expanded, have result and we’re getting branches across the street or half a mile or a mile away that we’re able to close. And that lets us get, take advantage of this -- our operating leverage. So, those just inherently would be more profitable than picking up a bank that’s a new geography for us. That being said, when a new geography does come along and it’s reasonable we would take a real hard look at it. But if it came down I could do one or the other, I would take the cost out probably first, just because it would be better -- the results -- the returns would be much better.

Yes and probably adding on to that, the only area that we talked about in the past that we’re not in a lot is North-West Indiana, but that’s really not extending away from our geography much, it’s really adjacent to where we’re at. But we would look at the North-West Indiana area also.

Great. Thanks guys.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Chip Dickson of DISCERN. You may begin.

Hi. Thanks for taking my question. The first one is just, assuming that rates don’t get pushed up until the second half of the year, how does that affect your margin?

Well, we -- we said I think in the previous call that where 340 plus or minus 10 is basically where we stand. Now last year was 350 plus or minus 10, but the accretion has run off. So, I think that the -- our loan to deposit ratio, the amount of liquidity we have on the balance sheet is what that will really affect that 10 basis points. We anticipate there’s still to be -- there’s still pricing pressure out there on deals and its not as bad as it was, it doesn’t have the same effect as it did. But I think if you went with 340 plus or minus 10 and looked at with the major driver of that plus or minus 10 being our loan to deposit ratio and the amount of liquidity we had that would be a good place to start. I know its kind of wide range but we don’t really give a lot of guidance, but that makes sense to us.

Yes. Some of the other calls I’ve listened to, there was kind of an assumption coming into the year that it would happen by the half and the idea that it might happen later I think caused some people to pause a little bit.

Chip, I have been wrong since the beginning on the interest rate. So I don’t even think about it any more. When it happens it will happen and we’re prepared for it.

Okay. Your regulatory costs are less almost in the really large banks, but I’m -- they’re still are a big burden on you guys, and I’m wondering where we are in this regulatory cycle. Are you close to the peaking cost where they might plateau going forward or you’re still going to have to build into 2016?

I think we’re close to the peak, it will be volume oriented as we pick on other banks, but I think we can take the cost out of the smaller banks and be much more efficient in doing it. But the stress tests are in and done and the infrastructure is done, that cost a good deal of money to get that up and running. We don’t have the CFPB which a good thing, because all of our banks are under $10 billion. But I think they’re right about where they should be. We do know we spent probably a little bit more than peer group on regulatory costs because our approach to the regulations is, there are the reps, they make the rules, we got to play the game. So we might as well beat them at their own game. If such, we strive to get the highest ratings we can from the regulators, have been very successful in doing that and have very good relations with our regulators and when you’re in acquisitive mode you don’t want little hiccup to stop the boat like its doing for M&T out there. So we do spend probably a little bit more than our peer group does. But we get -- we really get the good results out of them. But to answer your question, I think they kind of peak, they mostly come up with something new which wouldn’t surprise me.

Okay. And then, just on the M&A side, the companies who you’re buying, what are the management saying? Why do they want to sell now? What are some of the common themes?

A couple of common themes, many of them struggle through the cycle and did some recaps and really the zero billion to $1 billion banks that are real community banks, culturally they fit us very nicely. We seem to be the preferred buyer for those, but couple of these have gone through recaps or had some tough times, and they got their head above water now and they actually can get something for their franchise. And their decision is, especially the zero billion to $1 billion banks should stay in the business, absorb these regulatory costs and their inability to generate good earning assets. I mean they’re still up to their years in real estate. They can't put much more on to the regulatory rules, and the rest of us are digging a little bit deeper into or nor do they have the expertise to get involved with some of the other asset classes. So, they really can't generate earning assets, so they’re stuck with liquidity as zero spreads and they can never get those earnings up. So, many want to -- they can jump onboard with us. We can use our loan volume to lend them up and off it goes. But it’s just hard for in a metropolitan are for a zero billion to $1 billion bank to generate the assets necessary to cover all these extra costs that they have to put on the books, and quite frankly it’s probably not as much fun for them. Many of them, as they said have come out of recaps or come out of the cycle and I’ve said before its like, if you’re in a bank that’s troubled during a cycle its like being in a submarine getting dept charged and once you can finally break the surface and get some fresh air and you go, no I want to do that again. And many of them would rather team up knowing that our culture will fit there as our customers will be taken care of. So that’s a long answer to your question. I hope that [multiple speakers].

Thanks. And this is the last one, but your premium finance business is something that differentiates you and just what are the competitive pressures in that business and what's its role in the company going forward as you bank more acquisitions?

Well, as in every earning asset class we’ve seen the competition is pretty stiff, but we picked up again. We had an increase in units processed in the first quarter interestingly enough. The average ticket size went down by about say $1000 and our normal ticket size is $27,000, we have worked our way up to $24,000 and it dropped back last quarter, meaning I guess, there’s more capacity in the insurance market which surprised us. Also the larger deals that come through are -- because you can do $1 million, $2 million, $3 million deals in this business, and those command lower rates than what we’re used to in the smaller deals, and there’s a lot of pressure for those deals and as a result we’re not getting as many as we used to because they just don’t fit our profitability parameters. But if businesses continues to grow in terms of market share units processed and there’s a lot of upside there if you ever get back to the $27,000 which for years was the -- in the normal market that was the average ticket size and the hard market was up in the $40,000 range. That’s always a good thing when that happens once every 10 years for us. So competitively just like everything else in the earning asset side it is competitive, but we continue to build and grow that business.

Thank you.

You are welcome. End of Q&A

Thank you. I’m showing no further questions at this time. I’d like to turn the conference back over to Edward Wehmer for closing remarks.

Thanks everybody for dialing in and we look forward to talking to you offline or next quarter, and go Cubs. Thanks so much.