Welcome to the Second Quarter 2023 WillScot Mobile Mini Earnings Conference Call. My name is Amy, and I will be your operator for today's call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we conduct the question-and-answer session. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Nick Girardi, Senior Director of Treasury and Investor Relations. Nick, you may begin.

Good morning, and welcome to the WillScot Mobile Mini second quarter 2023 earnings call. Participants on today's call include Brad Soultz, Chief Executive Officer; and Tim Boswell, President and Chief Financial Officer. Today's presentation material may be found on the Investor Relations section of the WillScot Mobile Mini's website. Slide 2 contains our safe harbor statement. We will be making forward-looking statements today during the presentation and our Q&A session. Our business and operations are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. As a result, our actual results may differ materially from today's comments. For a more complete description of the factors that could cause actual results to differ and other possible risks, please refer to the safe harbor statement in our presentation and our filings with the SEC. With that, I'll turn the call over to Brad Soultz.

Thanks, Nick. Good morning to everyone, and thank you for joining us today. I'm Brad Soultz, CEO of WillScot Mobile Mini. Let's start on Slide 16 of our 2Q investor deck. 2Q 2023 was another terrific quarter for our company and showcases the predictable compounding returns and cash generation that are clearly accelerating as we scale the business. As shown on this page, we are already exceeding or on track to outpace all of the performance metrics that we laid out in our Investor Day in November of 2021. Revenue increased 11% year-over-year due to the compounding effect of rate optimization and VAPS penetration. Adjusted EBITDA increased 25% to $261 million and adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 500 basis points, a function of both the high flow-through of rate and VAPS as well as the margin enhancement initiatives on which we've been focused since we began operating on the SAP platform about two years ago. At 45% adjusted EBITDA margin, we're at the top-end of the milestone range that we laid out in our Investor Day. Cash generation in our business is just outstanding. We achieved a company record of $160 million of free cash flow and 27% free cash flow margin during the quarter. Year-to-date, we've delivered $263 million of free cash flow and expect to generate well in excess of $500 million of free cash flow in 2023. Clearly, we're well on our way towards our next free cash flow milestone of $650 million. And with leverage at [3x] net debt to adjusted EBITDA and the bottom end of our target range of 3x to 3.5x, our approach to capital allocation remains unchanged and unconstrained. During the quarter, we allocated $43 million to net CapEx. We invested $70 million in M&A, and we repurchased 5.4 million shares of our…

Thank you, Brad, and good morning, everyone. Page 21 shows a high-level summary of the quarter. Similar to Q1, we saw exceptionally strong financial performance across both segments, driven by continued strong pricing and value-added products penetration and outstanding margin performance across all revenue streams, resulting in record profitability and free cash flow. As Brad pointed out, we are approaching or exceeding every key financial metric in our operating ranges that we set forth at our Investor Day back in 2021. We still see over $1 billion of opportunity across our five growth levers. So as we look ahead into 2024, it's logical to expect that we'll find upside across many of these ranges. In the immediate term, the business is performing exactly as we would expect in this environment. Leasing revenues are compounding powerfully up 16% year-over-year, driven by pricing in value-added products which given our three-year lease durations are in very healthy spot rate spreads, will drive our run rate well into 2024 and 2025. In Q2, adjusted EBITDA margin, free cash flow margin and return on invested capital, all expanded to record levels. I'll go into more detail on profitability drivers in a minute, but we see multiple levers that will support margins well into 2024, which in turn is allowing us to allocate capital with confidence. We executed $70 million of [tuck-in] acquisitions in Q2 and expect that pace will increase through the end of the year. And we are using our growing surplus capital to repurchase shares with $891 million returned to shareholders in the last 12 months, and that represents over 9% of our outstanding share count over that period. Overall, our expectations for the year are unchanged with revenue and EBITDA up 12% and 19%, respectively, year-over-year at the midpoint. And as we…

Thanks, Tim. As always, thank you to our team and our customers for their continued support, and thank you to our shareholders for your continued trust with your capital. And thanks again to the team for the hard work to deliver not just the quarter, but as Tim referenced, continuing to drive towards 2024 and beyond. I wish all of you listening today continued safety and good health. This concludes our prepared remarks. Operator, would you please open the line for questions?

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Tim Mulrooney with William Blair.

Yes. My questions are on portable storage volumes down, I think, 6% primarily, I think, due to a pause on retail refurbishments. But I was curious if you were seeing softness anywhere else in any other markets as well or if that was the overwhelming primary driver of the decline was from the retail side?

Yes. Tim, that was the primary driver, but we are seeing the same kind of underlying core softening that you see in modular to storage as well.

Okay. Got you. So are you expecting a similar, again, for portable storage volumes, a similar volume decline in the third and fourth quarters as well?

No, this is as similar as we characterized in the last earnings call, just first look at core demand, we expect to be down at the end of the year 2% to 3%. You'll see that most prevalently in modular and then we had the compounding effect in the second and third quarter of the store remodels, which was like 15,000 containers on a year-over-year decline.

Okay. With these volumes coming down, is that also an indication that the spot rates are softening up right now as well? I'm just curious if like after two years of inflation and supply chain constraints, if you're seeing spot rates moving lower on a year-over-year basis.

No, we're really not seeing pressure on spot rates. I mean the market is very well organized. We're continuing to be frugal in terms of driving the incremental value with the product positioning and the logistics capability and the differentiated premium offering. So really not seeing any pressure on delivered spot rates. And as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, we're really not seeing much contribution from VAPS yet in storage, which will become more meaningful in 2024 and give us kind of that recipe that we've had in place for modular for five years, driving double-digit rate growth playing out in storage as well.

Our next question comes from Kevin McVeigh with Credit Suisse.

Tim framed really nicely kind of the variables on the full year guide. Is there no way to think about the dollar amount associated with them? And then just a quick follow-up. It's a lot of money, like right, I mean, $650 million is a lot of cash. Any thoughts, I know traditional capital allocation, but just any thoughts around maybe dividend or just a forge a lot opportunity, particularly given where the balance sheet sits today.

Kevin, this is Tim. I'll start with the guidance and variables that could move us around within there. But the punchline is, as I said in my remarks, is the mix of volume, price and value-added products really isn't any different than we anticipated coming out of the Q1 call which indicates relative stability across all of those key leasing KPIs. To Brad's point, we always, from the outset of the year, projected some year-over-year delivery declines from a core modular standpoint but that's more a function of 2022 being extremely robust rather than anything particularly different about 2023. And then you add the retail component on to that, which I think we've talked about at length right now. That retail piece is a source of potential upside as we go into Q4. As you know, we always service seasonal storage capacity for the big non-mall-based retailers going into the second half of Q3 and then into Q4. And we've obviously got more idle capacity this year with which to respond to that demand, and we're actively pursuing it. Acquisitions, as always, in our guidance, are incremental. Variable cost progression is a factor, which should drive a temporary and sequential decline of EBITDA from Q2 to Q3. That's normal as volume activity picks up in the business. And then I'd expect those margins to pop back up probably north of Q2 levels when we get into Q4. So that's the sequential progression that we're expecting. And then the last variable that can move quickly is delivering installation and sales revenues. Sales revenue is not a particular focus for us. We're 100% concentrated on driving that lease revenue run rate at any point in time, and we still see a very attractive run rate growth heading into 2024, which, again, is our primary focus and unchanged from the prior quarter. As it relates to your questions around capital allocation, we haven't changed our framework. And frankly, we're very happy right now to deploy that surplus capital into the share repurchase as we look out two, three, four years in terms of where the business is going, that's absolutely an accretive source of return for our long-term shareholders over time, and we consider ourselves to be among those. Your question around dividend is a good one. The stability of our cash flow streams absolutely support that type of capital allocation. So I think it's more a question of when, not if, we start having that discussion with the Board. But sitting here today, obviously, the share repurchase is the right place to be put in our dollars.

Our next question comes from Faiza Alwy with Deutsche Bank.

I wanted to follow up on portable storage spot pricing. Based on the gap that you mentioned around 10%, it looks like there's some deterioration from 1Q into 2Q. But then I heard you say that there hasn't been deterioration. But can you just maybe clarify that for us? And I think historically, Tim, you've talked about how you've been a beneficiary of inflation. And now with the disinflation narrative taking place, I'm curious how you think about your ability to take pricing as we get into '24 and beyond.

Yes, this is Brad. I'll clarify the rate and then pass it over to Tim for the inflationary point. The delivered spot rates for containers continue to progress. That compression in the spread, if you will, is simply a function of faster convergence of the fleet. I think that spread was approaching modular back at the fourth quarter when we had the seasonal units out last year at record level prices, prices that were above the average of the core markets. So that spread compression, if you will, is not a function of declining growth in spot rates, rather quicker convergence for the average of the portfolio.

And Faiza, this is Tim. I think the this inflation narrative is exactly that. It's a narrative, not necessarily the reality, especially what you see across construction markets. I don't think you talk to a contractor out there that's talking about kind of disinflation across their business. So this is still an extremely healthy environment for both modular and container pricing. And then you add on some of the other tactical and strategic techniques that we use to drive product positioning, price segmentation, the value-added products and services offering and then also benefiting from our differentiated logistics capabilities, especially on the storage side of the business where that's a differentiator. So no, pricing continues to be a highlight, and we don't see anything changing in that regard as we progress through the year.

Our next question comes from Andrew Wittmann with Baird.

I just wanted to clarify a response to a prior question. I think, Brad, you mentioned that core demand was down 2% or 3% was kind of the expectation for the year. I just want to make sure, was that comment specific to the Storage segment? Or was that for the Company overall? And could you comment on your updated expectations, if any, for core demand on the modular side of the business this year?

So the modular and let's wrap in the commercial and nonresi market, separating retail. As we've said on the last call, we expect it to be down 2%, 2% range at the end of the year. that same effect will impact the storage as well. The layover in storage is retail. And it's really -- there's a bifurcated effect in storage. You've got the remodels in the middle of the year. They largely didn't occur, and then you have your normal seasonal opportunity at the end of the year. The remodels didn't occur the seasonal demand, as I mentioned in my prepared comments, is just started in terms of order flow. It's in line with our expectation and demand and timing, but it's very early in. So I guess that's the bigger moving part, if you will, Andy, in storage as you look at year-end projections.

Yes. Got it. And then Tim, I just thought, just given that this has come up a couple of times this morning in some conversations, the quarter came in a little bit better than expected. Can you just talk about how that did or did not affect the way you approach guidance, the updated guidance here, which is, I guess, the same as last quarter.

Yes, like you said, a little bit better than expected, but we're not going to get 2Q trying to manage guidance, plus or minus 1% here. Very happy with the results in the quarter and encouraged by the margin trends in particular, Core leasing KPIs, very much in line with what we expected last quarter. But this is a business where we're looking out two or three years, and most of our time is spent focused on driving run rates and things like that, that will push us over that type of time horizon. So very happy with the trajectory of the business, implied run rate going into next year, it sets up a very good 2024. And frankly, I can't find any real red flags across our core KPIs that would cause me concern about executing any of those long-term targets.

Our next question comes from Scott Schneeberger with Oppenheimer.

So a lot of questions with regard to just consideration for demand across the two main segments. Could you all please elaborate on -- it sounds like just in general, is core demand of about down 2% to 3% for the year, slightly softer than where you were looking at the year at the beginning? Could you talk about non-res reshoring chips and science, infrastructure bill inflation Reduction Act, what you're seeing across all these that would pose any risk or upside to that down 2% to 3% in the back half and going into 2024?

Yes, Scott. Again, this is a reminder, these are three-year lease durations. So you know on rents moves slowly. I would recall in my comments in the prepared remarks, our second quarter North American modular quote rates were modestly up over prior year. And prior year was at record levels. So there's no crisis or issue here. Now objectively, construction nonresi starts in the first half, whether you look at dollars or square foot, we're down, right? ABI had went through a soft period, it's now stabilized. So there's no new news here. This is what we alluded to when we issued guidance, we kind of reaffirmed in the first quarter, and that's really where we're sitting here today. So I think as we look forward into the second half of the year and certainly into 2024, we're extremely excited about the potential of the onshoring, reshoring, infrastructure stimulus and such. And it's not the fact that we're sitting here waiting for something materialize in D.C., it's already happening, right? We're bidding, we're winning these projects. They're super exciting, and we are extremely uniquely positioned to take advantage of the opportunity and service the customers' needs in these cases.

Great. And then my second question is a two-parter with regard to VAPS. Your European peer talks about its VAPS penetration that's around greater than 60%. Where would you say this is specifically about modular, your VAPS penetration is, is the first part of the question. The second part is, in the quarter, the VAPS average monthly rental rate was up 13% year-over-year, but the LTM delivered rate was down 1% year-over-year. Are you tapping out on the VAPS story is where I'm going with this, if you could just describe that dynamic in the quarter? And is there any concern that maybe modular is getting long in the [indiscernible] in the VAPS [story,] you've maintained the [650.] Is that going to come from portable now? Or are we still feeling comfortable on modular?

Scott, it's Tim. I'll attempt to answer at least the first part regarding our European peer. But I think the best way to look at penetration is VAPS revenue relative to kind of the core unit leasing revenue. And if you look at our delivered rate of, call it [$471] over the last 12 months in a spot rate that's north of $1,000 per unit for modular. You're easily approaching that 50% range. If you wanted to look at penetration just in terms of the relative dollar contribution, I think that's probably the best way to do it. So we're really just focused on that dollar contribution at the end of the day. There is some -- well, the LTM VAPS delivered rate has flattened out. I think you also saw a commensurate pickup in core unit lease pricing in modular and that's -- there is some fungibility is the wrong word between those two. But in the core unit pricing standpoint, for example, we're getting surcharges now for things like restrooms and sanitation, which are value-added in their own rate, although not going to be impacting the LTM delivered metric. And as we look at just the core VAPS offering across the sales force, there's still a very wide dispersion of performance around that with top performers well in excess of the numbers that we're reporting here today. That's been the case forever, and that's the best practice sharing in coaching that we use to drive this over time. And this has been going on now for well over 10 years. And no change in terms of our expectations of pushing the sales force to $650 per unit over time.

Our next question comes from Steven Ramsey with Thompson Research.

Maybe to start with the CapEx efficiencies you have gotten so far in the modular refurbishment efforts, was this part of the $500 million target or the three- to five-year target of well over $500 million? And is this enough to move that range upward as you keep building on these efficiencies?

Steven, this is Tim. That's a good question. Because as we go back to think about the Investor Day framework that we laid out, we presented a bridge to $650 million of free cash flow. And the CapEx assumption in that bridge was circa $275 million. That $275 million probably wouldn't have had an assumption around the inflation that we incurred through the course of 2022 nor would have assumed meaningful refurbishment efficiencies. So I think there's probably some natural offset there, such that I'm actually very comfortable with the $275 million that we put in that bridge. And in fact, it's the midpoint of our guidance this year not coincidental. So I don't know that I'd point to too much change there other than it is definitely an improvement over the 2022 run rate that we're on and gives me confidence that we can keep it in the range that we had advertised as we head into 2024 and beyond.

Okay. Interesting. That's great. And then on storage VAPS, I realize it's not a small -- it's a tiny part of the reality for current financial results. But is this part of conversations with retail customers for Q4? And is this part of conversations with customers on quoting activity for projects that are set to start over the next 12 months?

100% on storage VAPS. And the nature of these things is they do take a little while to build. But as the portfolio churns, you start to get a compounding contribution from these types of things. And I won't say that VAPS in the Storage segment are insignificant. If you include the ground level office fleet, for example, we'll be pushing north of $90 million of revenue this year from value-added products and associated services in storage. The container portion of that is just now beginning to build. And if you look over like the last six months or so, you’re delivering the average container with north of $30 per unit per month of value-added products and services which translates to probably a $50 million run rate as you go into 2024. And that's before any contribution from PRORACK, right? So this is playing out frankly, better than we expected back at Investor Day. And the other thing, just to follow up on Scott's question, as you just think about what does all this mean? If we just hold value-added products penetration where it is today, across all of these products, you're talking about a $200 million revenue convergence opportunity that is yet to flow through our P&L. Pricing where it is today, there's about another $200 million convergence opportunity that is yet to flow through the P&L. So these are things we're very excited about. We're continuing to push the spot rate side of things. We absolutely have a value-added products penetration opportunity on storage that we're seeing, which is becoming part of the customer conversation. And to Scott's question a minute ago, no concerns about getting back to that $600 per unit trajectory on modular.

Our next question comes from Philip Ng with Jefferies.

Congrats on another strong quarter. The market is obviously nervous about new nonres activity slowing down and you called out ABI as well but you also highlighted the strength on the infrastructure side and some of these mega projects. So when we think about these crosscurrents, looking out to 2024, how should we think about what that translates to volumes next year? And then any color on how your bidding activity is progressing so far?

Yes. As I referenced, our quoting activity in the second quarter in NA Modular was up modestly over prior year. That's phenomenal, especially considering how strong 2022 was. As far as like cross currents, the fact that the ABI has stabilized into neutral positive territory, right? Following two quarters of contracting territory that's very supportive of a 2024 outlook. So I think we've probably seen if the ABI continues to remain strong, we see kind of core markets stable and recovering and you basically for jet fuel on with infrastructure, onshoring, reshoring and everything else that's already beginning to play out today.

So it sounds like, Brad, at this juncture, you're preaching your business is pretty short cycle. You're not expecting volumes to be down big next year. It sounds like it might have some upside next year. So that's pretty encouraging. And I guess switching gears, a question for Tim. I think you went out of the way to kind of highlight all the good stuff you guys are doing on the cost and execution side and the inflation coming down and then still pretty good momentum on pricing. What kind of volumes decline would you need to see for margins not to be up next year? Because it sounds like you got a lot of runway on the margin side of things for 2024.

Yes. I mean I haven't done that exact math, Phil, that would be hard to get to. Given I just said that you've got almost $400 million of revenue convergence opportunity across pricing and value-added products. And rough math is you get roughly [1/3] of that flowing through a year just based on our three-year lease durations and the cost efficiency opportunities on top of that. I feel very good about margins going into 2024. And I think around this time last year, I said I felt very good about margins going into 2023, and we just popped 500 basis points in Q2, and we'll be up at least 250 basis points for the year. So this is a business where you get those structural revenue growth opportunities flowing consistently and predictably through the portfolio as it churns. There's operating leverage in the business and quite a bit of discretion over things like variable costs and CapEx, which I don't know, make me very happy about the margin trajectory.

Our next question comes from Manav Patnaik with Barclays.

This is John Kennedy on for Manav. On the M&A, with the $80 million of tuck-in acquisitions last quarter, $70 million this, what is the expected contribution for full year '23? And then can you remind us about the acquisition financial profile in terms of the multiple, the synergy unlocking value enhancement, economic return profile, et cetera. And on the return profile, the unit level cumulative cash flow, I don't think those have changed in the slides throughout the presentation. Have there been changes to the acquisition costs, the maintenance as a result of efficiencies, et cetera?

John, this is Tim. I'll start with your questions around acquisition contribution. And I think the best way to -- we called out that there is roughly $17 million of revenue flowing into the Q2 numbers from acquisitions in the last 12 months. You can see -- assume that, that annualized run rate is a little bit higher than the $17 million because of some of those occurred during the course of Q2. So call it $20 million annualized that, you're at [$80 million,] put mid- to high 30s margin on that. And you've got an idea of the annualized EBITDA that's been acquired. And then if you compare that to the LTM acquisitions of $266 million in the last 12 months, you'll get about an 8.5x implied enterprise multiple at which we purchased those businesses. Fair to assume over a 12-month period that we get some synergy uplift primarily from cost and just operating those assets and branches consistent with the rest of our branch network. And then over time, as the portfolio churns, we get the benefits of pricing uplift in value-added products uplift depending on the specific asset class that we're talking about. So the tuck-in strategy is highly programmatic. We've got a team that meets weekly to manage a pretty exhaustive pipeline of opportunities, both early stage and recently integrated. So it is a repeatable process and core competency that we've developed since the completion of the Mobile Mini integration. And I'd expect that our investments there probably pick up a little bit as we close out 2023 and that continues to be part of our growth algorithm as we go into future periods. So very happy with that. And we haven't been in the habit of updating kind of the unit economics slide every quarter. We kind of revisit it once a year based on material changes. So yes, we're seeing some improvements in that kind of refurbishment cost on modular in the [latter 1/3] of the unit's life. And in terms of unit sourcing costs relative to spot rates and things like that, I still think pointing to roughly a 40, 48-month cash-on-cash payback on modular and 36-month cash-on-cash payback on containers. Then accelerate those returns with value-added products and services. Conceptually, that's still the right way to think about the unit economics in our business.

Appreciate it. And then a follow-up to a prior question that was asked on the CapEx efficiencies in the refurbs. Can I just confirm for the remainder of the year, the expected sequential progression on CapEx and free cash flow? And then when do you expect CapEx to kind of reflect or inflect to more to bring back some of the growth? I know it's a function of the 90-day capital planning, but what are the expectations for that?

Yes, I'd expect that CapEx increases sequentially along with our other variable costs in the P&L in Q3. And then a little more -- we haven't baked Q4 yet because we don't have a very long -- we have no long-term supply commitments in this business. We can actually be very reactive based on demand. But I do expect CapEx to increase sequentially as we go from Q2 into Q3. And then in terms of kind of more substantial fleet investment, there may be some kind of niche categories that we have in mind that could come to play in Q4 as we head into 2024. But in terms of our core modular and storage fleet investments, we typically wouldn't be ramping those up to support core demand growth until we get into the second half of Q1 heading into Q2. of next year, and that will obviously be part of our annual guidance for 2024. But to the question earlier, if I was starting to think about what's the number that I centered around, it would be that 275 number that we centered around in the Investor Day bridges that took us to the $650 million free cash flow range.

Sorry, free cash flow progression for Q3 and Q4, if I could please confirm that?

Yes, it should be roughly in line with where we left coming out of Q2, maybe dips a bit based on increased capital spend going into Q3. There's also going to be some offsetting growth there. And then typically, CapEx would go down a bit and margins would go up a bit in Q4 and free cash flow historically has been highest in Q4. So that would be probably a good base case to think about, but it will be demand driven and largely based on any CapEx fluctuation.

Our next question comes from Brent Thielman with D.A. Davidson.

Great. Tim, just the consideration for margin expansion into the fourth quarter, hoping just to clarify to what degree is the seasonal uptick in storage critical to that versus the other variables and drivers? In other words, would you still see that margin enhancement even if the seasonal activity in storage is possibly less than what you anticipate today?

Yes, Brent, it's absolutely the latter. The seasonal doesn't really impact my thinking at all as I give that guidance. It's really driven by the fact that repair and maintenance activity typically slows down in Q4. But as you know, our lease revenues just don't change very much, right? So what I would expect sequentially coming out of Q2 is maybe we get up to 200 basis points of margin contraction as we go into Q3. That will be driven by variable costs ramping up in the business. And then you could get maybe 400 points of sequential expansion going from Q3 into Q4. And that's, again, just driven by variable cost fluctuation in the business. Give me some latitude on the magnitude of those changes, of course. But order of magnitude, that's, I think, how we finish the year and that puts you at a kind of record margin heading into 2024 which, again, is why I've got a high degree of confidence on that. And it's not driven really at all by the seasonal business.

Got it. Okay. I appreciate that. And then just could you guys speak to the supply dynamics in the industry for both modular and storage? I recall that being constrained in recent years. I presume you've always been prioritized among your vendors. But to what degree do you see availability today for the industry versus a few years ago? Is it a greater circulation out there in terms of assets? If you could comment on that, that would be helpful.

Brett, it's Tim. I haven't really seen any material change. I'll start on the modular side of the business. And to the extent we're sourcing traditional product domestically, which is what virtually all of our competitors would be doing. We'd be sourcing from a network of 20-plus pretty much local manufacturers of modular buildings. At most, maybe 10% of the manufacturer's business will be focused on rental fleet. The primary focus would be permanent modular construction projects, which is not an area where we care to participate. So it is a fairly limited domestic supply base. And I think because of that, you haven't seen procurement costs really come down at all over the course of the last 12 months, which, again, to one of the earlier questions around deflation, I think that's more a narrative than it is a reality in our business, right? Any new capacity coming into the market today, especially on modular is at a much higher cost basis than the industry would have been managing historically. And frankly, we have some prospective sellers in our acquisition pipeline who are talking to us precisely because of that reason. Acquisition costs or procurement costs are up, capital costs are up, which makes it more difficult for a smaller competitor to grow their business and enhances our competitive position in the market, given our available capacity. A little bit different on the storage side. Those container prices can fluctuate to an extent with the capacity in the maritime shipping world. But it's quite another question to have that capacity filter, its way into all of our diverse 300 local markets where we're competing every day. So we just don't see that happening or impacting supply availability to a material degree or frankly, pricing to a material degree.

Our next question comes from Sean Wondrack with Deutsche Bank.

Great job on progressing on your goals from Investor Day. It's great to see.

Thanks Sean.

And when you think about some of these larger projects, the mega projects that continues to sort of dominate the headlines. When you think about the profile on that project, is that going to have like a different mix element than what you've typically seen, given that they're sort of becoming a bigger maybe part of the mix there? Can you maybe talk about sort of the average duration of these things and how they compare to your other contracts?

Yes, Sean, it's a good question. I think there is absolutely going to be a mix shift in the overall balance of non-residential construction activity moving towards these types of projects. And I think it's still very early innings. When we look at over 100 of these mega projects kind of in our CRM today, the vast majority haven't even started yet, right? And we do have a disproportionately high win rate on those projects. And that is in part because they are larger, longer duration, more employees on site, more likely to need, more sophisticated, complex, higher square footage turnkey solutions, which is our sweet spot. That's where we've got the strongest competitive positioning in the market, and we're the only pure-play space provider that can cross-sell across all of our different capabilities into those opportunities. If you look at projects that have been announced or awarded related to the infrastructure build, the vast majority of those haven't started yet either. So Brad talked about nonres square footage down in the first half of the year. That's really before the impact, I believe, of the majority of these reshoring and infrastructure-related projects, which is one of the reasons we feel pretty good about the future in 2024 on the volume side and are disproportionately strong competitive positioning given that mix change.

Right. And no, that's very helpful. And then when you just think about -- does it strike is a typical contract where it's roughly a year duration and then there are sort of escalators as you move forward? Or would it be like a three-year project, maybe a little bit lower margin, I'm just kind of curious how that sort of looks from a high level.

I wouldn't characterize a three-year project as being lower margin because you've got very little variable costs associated with that contract over the course of three years. So absolutely, these all else equal should skew longer duration relative to our -- what has now become a 13-month, I think, minimum contractual term. We have seen some increases in term partly due to project delays. But I think part due to the mix of our business and being positioned more towards these larger scale opportunities. So yes, I would expect longer contract duration on -- it tends to correlate with project size. And yes.

Got it. That's very, very helpful. And then if I could sneak one more in. You have the [indiscernible] to 2025 coming due in just short of two years. I was curious, are you considering doing something with them? And then also, do you have the flexibility to repay them with your revolver? Should you desire to do that?

Yes, 100%. That's what the revolver is there for. We could refinance them into the Rover tomorrow if we if we so choose. And then as you know, we've been a repeat issuer in the high-yield market. There's no urgency to frankly do anything about the [6% and 8%] notes right now just given where short-term benchmark rates have moved. So we're quite happy with them. We've always got the availability to refinance them into the ABL, and we can be opportunistic as it relates to activity in the high-yield market. You'll be well aware, we got upgraded recently by S&P. So I think we're now two notches closer to the United States credit profile. So very happy with the progression of our credit metrics and frankly, the flexibility in our debt structure.

We have now reached the end of today's call. I will now turn the call back over to Nick.

Thanks, Amy. Thank you all for your interest in WillScot Mobile Mini. If you have additional questions after today's call, please contact me.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference. You may now disconnect.