Hello and welcome to the WesBanco Second Quarter 2019 Earnings and the WesBanco/Old Line Merger Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to John Iannone. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Keith. Good morning and welcome. On today's call, we will first briefly review WesBanco, Inc.'s second quarter 2019 earnings and then discuss the proposed WesBanco, Inc./Old Line Bancshares, Inc. merger. Speaking on the call today are Todd Clossin, WesBanco's President and Chief Executive Officer; Bob Young, WesBanco's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and James Cornelsen, Old Line's President and Chief Executive Officer. Following the opening remarks, we will begin a question-and-answer session. WesBanco's second quarter 2019 earnings release, which contains consolidated financial highlights and reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures, was issued yesterday afternoon, as was the press release and associated investor presentation, providing details of the proposed merger. Both of these documents are available on wesbanco.com. This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements including certain plans, expectations, goals and projections and including statements about the benefits of the proposed merger between WesBanco, Inc. and Old Line Bancshares, Inc., which are subject to numerous assumptions risks and uncertainties. In addition presentation to which we will be referencing today was filed last evening as part of the Form 8-K and posted to wesbanco.com. Further, we call your attention to pages two and three of the presentation, which contain further details on obtaining more information about the proposed merger and other important disclosures. Actual results could differ materially from those contained or implied by such statements for a variety of factors including: The businesses of WesBanco and Old Line may not be integrated successfully or such integration may take longer to accomplish than expected; the expected cost savings and any revenue synergies from the proposed merger may not be fully realized within the expected time frames; disruption from the proposed merger may make it more difficult to maintain relationships with clients, associates or suppliers; required governmental approvals for the proposed merger may not be obtained on the expected terms and schedule; Old Line shareholders may not approve the proposed merger; changes in economic conditions; movements in interest rates; competitive pressures on products, pricing and services; success and timing of other business strategies; the nature, extent and timing of governmental actions and reforms; and extended disruption of vital infrastructure and other factors described in WesBanco's 2018 annual report on Form 10-K, Old Line's 2018 annual report on Form 10-K and documents subsequently filed by WesBanco and Old Line with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements included in this call and associated presentation are based on information available at the time of the call and presentation. Neither WesBanco nor Old Line assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statement. I would now like to turn the call over to Todd Clossin, WesBanco's President and CEO. Todd?

Thanks, John. Good morning and thank you for joining us. On today's call we're going to review our results for the second quarter of 2019 as well as discuss the proposed merger with Old Line Bancshares, Inc., both of which were announced yesterday evening. This is an exciting time in the measured and thoughtful evolution and strategic diversification of WesBanco. Our results for the second quarter demonstrate our diligent focus on credit quality, profitability and positive operating leverage to ensure a strong organization for our shareholders. The proposed merger with Old Line is an example of the continued solid execution on our long-term growth strategies. We are pleased with WesBanco's performance during the second quarter of 2019. Successful execution of our growth and diversification plans has enabled WesBanco to transform into an emerging regional financial institution built upon a century old trust business and 150-year-old community bank. During the last three years, we have significantly diversified our institution into new higher growth markets with great demographics, while maintaining a critical focus on expense management and credit quality. As we mentioned last quarter, we continue to see improvement in certain lending headwinds we experienced during the latter half of 2018. The targeted reductions in our indirect consumer portfolio related to its risk/return profile have ended. In fact, we reported 2% year-over-year organic growth in this category during the second quarter of 2019. Our home equity lending continues to be under pressure, primarily due to higher interest rates and the impact of last year's tax reform legislation. Residential mortgage continues to be a bright spot for us as both total production and the pipeline are up significantly year-over-year resulting in strong quarterly mortgage banking fee income and a 2.8% year-over-year organic growth in the one to four family mortgage loans primarily jumbo…

Thanks, Todd, and good morning to you all. For the three months ended June 30, 2019, we reported GAAP net income of $44.8 million and earnings per diluted share of $0.82, as compared to $33.2 million and $0.71 respectively in the prior year period. Excluding after-tax merger-related expenses from both periods, net income increased 19.9% to $44.9 million and earnings per diluted share increased 2.5% to $0.82, reflecting the additional shares issued for last year's two acquisitions. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, we reported GAAP net income of $85.2 million and earnings per diluted share of $1.56 as compared to $66.7 million and $1.47 per share respectively in the prior year period. Once again excluding after-tax merger-related expenses from both periods, net income increased 23.2% to $87.7 million and earnings per diluted share increased 1.9% to $1.60, again reflecting the additional shares issued for the acquisitions. As Todd mentioned, we continued to realize stabilization across several loan categories during the second quarter, which led to 0.9% loan growth on a sequential basis. Total loan production was up from both the prior year quarter, as well as the first quarter of this year. Residential mortgage originations continue to be strong in the current lower interest rate environment as they were up 15% year-over-year, driven by home purchases and construction across our footprint as the expansion of our mortgage origination teams continue to take market share as well as our new Kentucky-based origination teams. The strength of our deposit franchise has helped to maintain our loan-to-deposit ratio in the 87% range as well as aid profitability by controlling our funding costs. Our total deposit funding cost has increased 11 basis points during the last 12 months and just 15 basis points during the last five years, despite nine increases…

Great. Thanks. I appreciate that. Our long-term growth strategy is focused on several key pillars we've talked about this before: building a diversified loan portfolio with an emphasis on commercial and industrial residential mortgage and home equity lending; increasing fee income as a percentage of total net revenues over time; maintaining a high-quality retail banking franchise and franchise-enhancing acquisitions. These pillars would not be possible if they were not built upon our two strong legacies of our franchise, an unwavering focus on delivering positive operating leverage, while also making necessary growth-oriented risk prevention investments and maintaining our strong culture of credit quality risk management and compliance principles upon which our company was founded nearly 150 years ago. Furthermore, the inherent strength of our diversification and growth strategies is how the components and support each other to ensure success and profitability regardless of the operating environment. The proposed merger with Old Line brings together two high-quality institutions with disciplined risk cultures, and strong customer focus. Old Line is a strong-performing community-based financial institution, with excellent credit quality and a focus on commercial lending, which shares our commitment to client service and community banking. We're pleased to be able to partner with them, and provide the customers of Old Line with a broader array of banking services including expanded commercial, and mortgage lending capabilities, as well as a myriad of wealth management solutions. Before we review the slide deck, I'd like to provide Old Line's CEO and President, Jim Cornelsen the opportunity to say a few words. In addition, he'll be available to answer questions during the Q&A session. Jim?

Thank you, Todd and good morning everyone. I'm pleased to have the opportunity to speak with you all today. We are excited about our merger with WesBanco and becoming an integral part of its nearly 150-year history as a community bank. WesBanco is the ideal partner for Old Line. Combined with treating people right, their history of solid execution on their operational and growth strategies has led to a strong track record of operational performance and merger success. During our 30 years, Old Line has grown from a single branch office to 37 locations and 10 lending offices with more than $3 billion in total assets. We are proud to say that our customers have grown with us and this holds true to our philosophy of partnership where we play a role in the development and prosperity of our great region. The same can be said for our partnership with WesBanco. Their customer-centric philosophy and focus on the success of the communities on which they operate is unparalleled. Through this new partnership, we'll be in a much stronger position to deliver improved value to our customers through additional high-quality products and services as well as growth opportunities for our employees. The branch staff and lending teams whom our customers have relied upon to be their local franchise advocate will continue to be there to help guide them. In addition, I look forward to continuing my relationship as Chairman of the Mid-Atlantic market for WesBanco to help ensure a smooth transition and a growing future and growth in the Mid-Atlantic market. Thank you, Todd.

Thanks, Jim. I'd now like to review the merger presentation beginning with slide number 5. This merger is a strategic expansion with financially sound pricing. The combination of our two strong companies significantly expands our franchise east into the Mid-Atlantic region consistent with our stated acquisition strategy. Old Line Bancshares is an approximate $3.1 billion institution, headquartered in Bowie, Maryland with $2.4 billion in loans, $2.4 billion in deposits, 37 branches and 10 loan production offices. This merger fits into our stated parameters of representing no more than 20% of our combined size. Besides entering the state of Maryland, as the ninth largest financial institution, this merger will gain us entry into the two fastest-growing MSAs in the Mid-Atlantic region Baltimore and Washington, D.C. both of which have great demographics and growth prospects. In addition, pro forma total assets of approximately $16 billion will provide enhanced scale to help cover the costs associated with the Durbin Amendment and our infrastructure enhancements as part of crossing the $10 billion asset threshold last year. The financial aspects of the proposed merger are attractive, with a greater than 20% internal rate of return, positive earning accretion of 4.3% during 2020 and 6.2% in 2021 and the tangible book value dilution of approximately 3.8% is anticipated to be earned back in approximately 3.3 years. And last but not least, pro forma capital ratios will remain substantially in excess of the well-capitalized guidelines. On slide 6 is a summary of the key terms of the proposed merger, which is expected to close during the next two to three quarters pending WesBanco and Old Line shareholder and customer -- customary regulatory approvals. This is a 100% stock transaction with the shareholders of Old Line receiving 0.7844 of a share of WesBanco common stock for each common…

Thanks Todd. Just a few additional notes and we'll get on to Q&A. On Slide 12 are summary financials for WesBanco and Old Line Bancshares for the six months ended June 30th, 2019. As you can see from this slide, there are -- these are similar and compatible organizations that are well managed, have strong return and efficiency ratios, and they provide many opportunities for growth. Old Line will represent about 20% of the combined organization upon completion. Furthermore, their financial performances in the top quartile for their peers and lines up nicely with our own performance. As Todd mentioned, this is a strategic expansion with financially sound pricing. And so turning to pricing on Slide 13, here are the metrics and key modeling assumptions for the proposed merger. As Todd mentioned, the deal has an internal rate of return greater than 20%, well above our cost of capital hurdle. It enjoys positive earnings accretion and meets our goal of having tangible book value dilution earn back of approximately 3.3 years. The price to tangible book value per share is 177% with a very reasonable priced 2019 and 2020 analyst EPS estimates of 13.4 times and 12.2 times respectively and a core deposit premium of 12.6%. As this is a new market for us, we anticipate operational cost savings of approximately 31% with approximately 76% -- 75% phased in during 2020 and the remainder in 2021. Majority of these savings will be from back-office operational consolidations as there is no branch overlap between our markets currently. There are estimated merger-related expenses of about $30.4 million. We have a gross loan credit mark assumed of $24.4 million, that's about 1% of loans, of which 75% is estimated to be accretable and a core deposit intangible assumption of 2.25% amortized on an…

Sure. Just turn to slide 16. In summary, we're excited about our merger with Old Line. This is a strong-performing franchise with excellent credit quality, commercial lending focus, a topflight team and respected position within its communities. During the last three years, we have significantly diversified our institution into new high-growth markets, with great demographics, which will now span six states across the Midwest, Midsouth and now the Mid-Atlantic region as a top 10 financial institution in the State of Maryland. This is an appropriately priced transaction that is strategically and financially compelling and continue to diversify our franchise and prominent major metropolitan markets. Furthermore, there is an opportunity for increased revenue as WesBanco has larger balance sheet provides higher lending authorization abilities as well as introducing additional products and services including wealth management to the region. We pride ourselves on delivering large bank capabilities with a community bank feel, which is one of the reasons -- one of the key reasons, we were recently named the number 7 Best Bank in America by Forbes Magazine. WesBanco has a long history of strong expense, credit risk management, experienced management that can execute on our strategies, solid technology and back-office expertise, good capital and liquidity strength. We have a proven track record of successful acquisitions that meaningfully expand our franchise and its growth opportunities and we're excited to continue this trend with the successful integration of Old Line Bancshares. We're pleased to welcome the customers and the employees of Old Line to the WesBanco family. We are now ready to answer your questions. Operator, would you please review the instructions?

Yes, thank you. [Operator Instructions] And the first question comes from Catherine Mealor with KBW.

Thanks. Good morning and congrats.

Thanks, Catherine.

Thank you.

I thought I'd start maybe first with the margin outlook. Thank you, Bob for your commentary on how you're thinking about the margin with lower rate. I wanted to see if we could take that margin outlook and layer in Old Line. And how should we think about the leverage of WesBanco's 82% loan-to-deposit ratio and Old Line's over 100% loan-to-deposit ratio and any leverage that you have there to improve the margin? Maybe you can lower some of Old Line's higher-cost deposits and then better leverage your balance sheet as well?

Bob, why don't you handle that?

Catherine, you kind of took the words out of my mouth that's a pretty good summary of what we intend to do. Then answer to your loan-to-deposit question would be about 91% on average deposits, 92% using period end deposits as a measuring base. Certainly, the opportunity on the wholesale borrowing side, we think is significant. We also recognize Jim and Mark have done a great job in attracting both public and institutional deposit customers to their fold. And I've indicated on prior calls that's an important strategy for us as well. Just in the public funds arena we have between $1 billion and $1.1 billion currently on our balance sheet. So we're going to continue to work that strategy for them. And hopefully, by melding our pricing strategies together with their relationship management capabilities, we'll be able to meld that together successfully on the pricing side going forward and we think we'll have an opportunity to do that as Old Line would've just with the upcoming rate decreases that are projected in our model and by the Federal Reserve. Turning then to the margin and I guided to a little bit of a decrease in our core margin going forward as well as the GAAP margin just from the standpoint of continuation of reducing our purchase accounting accretion going forward by one basis point or two each quarter going in 2020 and excluding through the end of this year before CECL any additional accretion from impaired payoffs -- impaired loan payoffs like we experienced in the first half of the year. And answer to your question about what does it look like when you put the two together? We're anticipating that you're going to have somewhere around $2.5 million to $3 million of accretable income on a quarterly basis in that first year call it $10 million with a caveat that, obviously, marks and rate determinations and accretion going forward will be based upon where the interest rate market is as of closing as compared to the marks were predetermined based upon really disclosures that Old Line made with their first quarter 10-Q. And so the two most significant impact to margin going forward to the loan mark as -- the accretable portion of the loan mark I should say as well as the CD book. We're anticipating that we will see a slight increase in our base case margin keeping in mind the base case margin for us will drift a little bit lower based upon my remarks earlier. But the enhanced purchase accounting -- and really margin despite their higher cost of deposits, it lines up fairly close to our core margin indicates to me and we've done a high level analysis of this that we'll be a few basis points mid-single digits is what I would guide to on the margin in the first full year after the acquisition. Does that answer the two questions I think you had?

Yeah, it did. That was perfect. And the $2.5 million to $3 million accretion income that was an annual number or quarterly?

No it's quarterly. It's $10 million to $11 million annually is what we're looking at right now, sub debt borrowings well there's not much there, most of those are short, the CD book and the loan book.

Okay, great. And then maybe one follow-up question is just on growth. So WesBanco is a low single digit grower. Old Line has been more of a high single, low double digit grower. And certainly these are some really nice high growth markets that you're going to enter. Can we -- is it fair to assume that you will be comfortable allowing for the Old Line franchise to still grow at the level that they have grown? Or do you feel like that growth rate may pull back just a little bit as you kind of push the two cultures together? Thanks.

No, no. We don't anticipate pulling back at all. Again it will be 20%, greater than 20% the loan growth going forward. So very important to us that the lenders are not only able to do the things they're doing today, but will be able to do more because we got a bigger balance sheet and we can take bigger bites of particular deals and handle a lot of deals ourselves. So we don't anticipate that going back at all. We want to give them the leash to move forward fast do the things that they've been doing. Credit quality has been excellent. We spend a lot of time together and we know those line up very, very well. So I think from an underwriting perspective the kind of deals they do, the kind of deals we do, expertise on both sides of the equation, all lines up really nice. So this company has a great risk profile and we've got a great risk profile, so we're not going to pull that back at all. So I would tell you the low to mid-single digit as you know I've been saying that for the last couple of years and maybe that's a little conservative given the acquisitions in Kentucky and now out here in the Mid-Atlantic markets, but I like to be conservative in what we put out there. But don't read anything into that we're going to change what these guys are doing.

Okay, great. Thank you so much and congrats.

Thank you. And the next question comes from Russell Gunther with D.A. Davidson.

Hey good morning guys.

Good morning, Russ.

Actually I had a couple of questions on the quarter if I could. Bob wanted to follow-up on comments you made about the cost saves you've recognized on the most recent deal. I think you said you got majority of the personnel there, but is there additional cost savings that you could quantify for us that you expect in the back half of this year and early 2020?

Russell, what we've said is that 75% of the cost should be achieved this year and the rest next year. Some analysts apply that as though that's 100% as of April 1st. Others are feeding that in through their model with 100% achieved as of January 1, 2020. The kinds of things that we have yet to achieve are some software and equipment redundancies that we will be terminating over the course of next few months. Think about document retention disaster recovery those kinds of things and certain software systems that are duplicated until sometime later this year as applications are consolidated and turned off. Obviously we achieved the core conversion back in February, but there are some lingering systems that -- where there's some duplication that will occur but we will eliminate over the rest of the year. Telecommunication is another area that we typically get pretty significant cost savings given our very cost-efficient methodology using the internet and networking capabilities. That has yet to be realized. We have some supplies costs. Some training costs those areas that will be recognized. Professional fees were higher in the second quarter for us some of that remains from their platform. And so those will terminate or reduce over the back half of the year. So those are the kinds of things we have yet to get. We did -- you can see the numbers in the press release. We did see a reduction between the third quarter and the first quarter of 2019 on personnel. They were basically 60 to 70 individuals from Farmers that left the organization either through attrition or the March cuts after the conversion. What you see this quarter in terms of an increase is really related to summer help that we typically get. So in terms of the personnel cost savings with just a couple of exceptions and a little bit on the benefit side that's pretty much all achieved here by end of first quarter early second quarter. I think, I answered both of your questions. Do you have a follow-up? Was that satisfactory?

No. You got it Bob. I appreciate that. And then just to circle back to your comments on the tax rate for the back half of this year is there a potential for any tax credits to lower that or as we look into 2020? Anything available to you to lower that rate?

Todd I'll take that if that's okay?

Yes. Go ahead, Bob.

So recall we had a $40 million award of new markets tax credits last year and an additional $25 million this year. Really we have yet to roll those out in any significant way. And so I expect to see in both our budget expectations for 2020 as well as on a realized bases additional opportunities to deploy those new markets tax credits through our community development corporation in our rural markets. And so that would give us -- as we roll those credits out and they become loans in low to moderate-income areas or in rural markets the first year credit is 5%, the lifetime credit is 39%. The offset being a little bit lower interest rate to the customer or other concessions. So we have that. We'll have a little bit more on the low-income housing tax credit side as we continue to be active there mostly for CRA purposes. And as we meld the two state local municipal portfolios there may be some opportunities there as well. Recall we sold some muni securities in the first quarter and we'll be continuing to replace those through the back half of the year. Those are the three main areas that I can think of at this point that would cause us to have a slightly less rate next year than where we are this year between 18.2% and 18.4% on a year-to-date basis.

Very good. Okay. Thanks for your help with those items. I want to switch back to the deal if I could. So Todd appreciate your comments on the growth profile at Old Line and the pro forma going forward. I guess, could you just give us a sense for what that growth rate would be in their markets? Is that a mid single-digit for them that you'd expect? And then within that guidance is there anything -- understanding credit quality is fairly pristine there is there anything you'd ring fence as you'd want to manage lower?

I would say, no. There's nothing that we are looking at from a ring fence perspective or anything like that. You get what the market gives you right? I mean that's -- I think both organizations are the same in terms of credit quality and healthy kind of deals we look at and things like that. So that's some quarters -- like I look at things on a rolling four quarter basis. Some quarters that could bump around a lot. So you could see some quarters up at double-digits and some quarters in single-digits. But I would think and Jim is here with me he may want to comment on it but I could see that the future looks like the past. I mean excluding merger-related type of attrition that occurs from past acquisitions I would expect the growth rate here to be very similar to what it was in the past on the lending side. I'll be disappointed if it's not. Maybe even greater because of the bigger balance sheet and the ability to take bigger pieces of deals.

Very good guys. Thanks for taking my questions.

Sure.

Thank you. And the next question comes from Casey Whitman with Sandler O'Neill.

Good morning.

Good morning, Casey.

Congrats on the deal. I just -- I want to be clear on the accretion guide you guys gave of $2.5 million to $3 million quarterly. Is that just the Old Line piece? Or is that the total accretion expected including the accretion you're getting from previous deals?

That's just the Old Line piece.

Okay. Great. And maybe can you expand just a little bit more on the specific kind of fee income products that you think there's going to be the most opportunity for you guys in the Maryland market?

Yes. I would say usually the first one that ramps up a little bit quicker it's more the lending side the private banking because we've got some pretty unique private banking products with physicians -- medical professionals and other professionals, accountants, attorneys. I mean really some very attractive products that we are seeing really significant growth on in some of the Kentucky markets as we introduced those over the last year or two. So I would see that early on. I would also see early on swap fees. We generate significant amount of revenue in swap fees and I think that's something that could be introduced to the market here fairly quickly as well too. I would think our insurance products through WesBanco securities is something that's typically sold through our branch network and that's going to be significantly bigger with the 37 locations at half year. I think, when you look at licensed bankers in the branches, but also brokers that we got and roll that part of our program out here as well too, I think, that can generate some significant revenue for us. The trust fee is a little longer-term cycle on that. You got to build that over time and they don't have that business here at Old Line. So that's something that incrementally takes time to build. But they've got great relationships with great customers, who have those kind of needs, so I would anticipate that we would have the ability to grow that over time as well too. So those are the things that come to mind right off the bat that I think would be additive. But, again, none of those are here in the model. But we've been planning for the ability to kind of, as we've gotten bigger, have the processes in place, the programs in place to very quickly scale those businesses, so that we're not going to try to figure out how to do it. We've already got the playbook, we already know it, and then we just roll it out to the markets. And we'll start training on those and adding some staff in select areas, maybe in the branches and things like that to focus even more on home equity products and things like that. They've got a great residential mortgage lending division here already. We're going to be adding additional products to that. I was talking to some of the employees down here this morning about that. That'll obviously increase lending capabilities, but also the extend some of that's in a secondary market, would increase fee income as well too.

Got it. Helpful. Thank you. Maybe just one more, kind of thinking bigger picture, as we look at your pro forma map here. Several markets you could have some opportunities that you're kind of skipping over. So, for example, look at Northern Virginia, just longer term any plans or hopes to expand in that market or any others, either by acquisition or de novo?

We're pretty paced -- measured in terms of how we move forward and we did two mergers last year to get up and over $10 billion. Obviously, there are some real economics here to get to $16 billion or so in terms of covering some of the cost of covering $10 billion. So we've been pretty acquisitive here in the last couple of years, because there were some financial drivers that were important to do that. We're not in any big hurry or race to get to a certain size. I want to make sure we're delivering earnings per share value. To me, that's the one biggest determinant. As we grow in size, we got to continue to deliver earnings per share. If we just deliver a bigger balance sheet, that doesn't help anybody. We need to be able to deliver earnings per share growth. So if we find opportunistic opportunities that can do that, like this, then we would continue to move forward on that. But not anything that would ramp up apace or anything like that. But that market would very much -- within the six-hour drive of Wheeling would very much be in focus and, I mean, recalling just the Mid-Atlantic region. Jim has got tremendous contacts and connections in this marketplace as well, too. So it'd be wise of me to tap into his expertise with the banks around here over time. So no, we're not coming here to do this and then be done. But I also don't expect to do anything in rapid fire succession or anything like that. This is a big merger for us. 20% of the combined size and we want to make sure we get it right

Got it. Thank you for taking my questions.

Sure.

Thank you. And the next question comes from Austin Nicholas with Stephens.

Hey, everybody. Good morning.

Good morning, Austin.

Congrats on the deal. I appreciate the commentary on the margin combined with Old Line. I guess, as I think about the core margin at Old Line around the 3 -- mid 3.30s level, kind of, as reported today. And then yours in that kind of -- or WesBanco is in the kind of 3.50 and trickling down to that may be lower 3, 3.40s as we exit the year or mid 3.40s. Can you may be just walk me through, I guess, how to think about the impact to that Old Line margin from the TruPS redemption and some of the balance sheet restructuring that can get you to your commentary of maybe the slight increase on a base case on the NIM?

Why don't you go ahead on kind of continued margin questions? You handle that.

Yes. And, Austin, the model includes about $350,000 a year in savings I believe on an after-tax basis associated with the $6 million TruPS redemption. They've got that marked at about $4.2 million, $4.3 million right now. And then, you'll note that they issued sub debt here in 2016. Of course, we have some sub-debt as well that we inherited from YCB, unrelated to the TruPS not tenured, it's regular sub-debt. The five-year repricing on both of those tranches happens to be close to one another. At the end of 2021, we'd look for the opportunity to do something at that point in time. That -- at least, on their side, their $35 million would be projected to save us several hundred thousand dollars just because we could issue at a lower rate and that, of course, depends upon the market at that time. So, those are a couple of numbers that actually we have in the model, but I don't have in the estimate of accretion going forward. My estimate of margin-related increase related to the accretion as well as the combination of the two balance sheets was that few basis points and it did not include the TRUPs redemption or the sub debt refinancing in, I guess, two or three years from now. So -- but we do have that in the merger model relative to the overall earnings accretion that is expected. Hopefully that was responsive. Was there another question?

Yes. I guess maybe that's pretty helpful, yes. Just so the commentary on the slight increase on the base NIM that you've mentioned that's kind of referring to the reported NIM for WesBanco?

Yes.

Or is that, okay. Not the core NIM?

With purchase accounting.

Got it. Perfectly understood.

But again that's using a pro forma as of -- we just updated this as of 6/30 and it's consistent with what we have put together at 3/31 with the two organizations as well, and it is with that $10 million to $11 million, $10 million to $12 million worth of total accretion that's planned in the first quarter. Obviously that would come down throughout the four quarters and then into that following year. It's kind of like a level set as of day one using a pro forma as of 6/30. And again, the reminder here is that our base case will come down a couple, three basis points before the end of the year and moving into next year and probably theirs will as well in that current interest rate environment.

Understood. No, that's really helpful. I appreciate that. And then, I guess, just the EPS numbers that are being used for the EPS accretion estimates, is that just consensus 2020 and 2021 estimates, or are those something different?

It is, and then with the long-term growth rate applied after 2020. Since neither one of us provide guidance, we think the safest thing to do is just to use in the model for those first two years 2019 and 2020. And yeah, those first two years the consensus and then apply a long-term growth rate which for them is 8% going forward a little bit less.

Okay. That's really helpful. And then, Todd, I know in past deals the company has been pretty successful with their -- with the acquisitions, especially retaining employees and really doing a great job with that. And I know part of that strategy has involved bringing some lenders over the wall and putting retention agreements in place, as I think you've disclosed in the past. Is that something you I guess were able to do here? Just any commentary on maybe the overall kind of retention strategy.

The quick answer is yes, same as we've done in the past with retention agreements. So happy to get that done and get that in place prior to announcement. I think that the business model with Old Line and WesBanco and kind of the way we handle lending and the way we approach things and even operationally how we do things is very similar. I think in our past acquisitions things have gone well. But here I -- it just from an assimilation standpoint looks really nice. Again, not much in the way of difference in terms of what the lenders -- obviously new platform and some new processes, but I think the transition should be very seamless. But we do have those agreements in place, and we'll work to probably get some more at different levels of the organization post announcement.

Okay. Great. And then just on the close date can you remind -- I know it says a couple of quarters or two in the release, but can you maybe just give some more details on when you'd expect the close date and what kind of would influence it?

Yeah. I mean, if you look at our historical track record, we've closed deals around four months or so after announcement. Obviously, we got a shareholder vote on both sides here and we got to get through the regulatory approvals and all that. So, I would say that say the next several quarters, because it could be four months, it could be right into the holidays, Thanksgiving, Christmas, it could flow into the beginning of next year, depending upon how things go. So want to provide a little bit of leeway in there. I see a lot of banks talk about a year -- they put a year in their press release, we're not doing that. That would be an outlier for us. So, I would think towards the end of this year beginning of next year.

Got it. And then just one last one, if I may, on the tax rate. I think you made some comments on what you'd expect the tax rate to be. And I didn't recall it if you made an expectation for the tax rate pro forma with Old Line.

I did not say. We've done some work on that. We think adding in the Maryland state income tax and our federal items would get us basically in that same 18% to 19% rate that we talk about for ourselves. I mentioned where we are today at 18.2% to 18.4% but our overall guidance for this year is 18% to 19%. It'll probably move up a little bit closer to 19% on a pro forma basis just given the Maryland state income tax rate is higher than our other states.

Sure. Makes sense. Great. Well, thanks for taking my questions, and congrats again guys on the deal.

Thank you.

Thank you. And the next question comes from Steve Moss with B. Riley FBR.

Good morning, guys.

Hi, Steve.

I guess congratulations on the deal here. I guess a couple of questions just to follow-up. Obviously it's a large deal takes you up to over $15 billion in assets. Wondering does this raise the minimum size of a deal you will consider in the future Todd.

Yeah. I mean we said 20% of combined size. So as we've gotten bigger, I think that's a fair comment. We like to be able to do series of mergers and things like that. So when we do a merger, we want to make sure it's big enough to have an impact the cost and everything else and time and management focus everything required. We want it to be sizable enough. Plus coming into a new market like this, you want to make sure you're partnering with the team and the bank that's going to be big enough to defend and grow, and that's clearly what we have here. So, I would say that 20% of combined size is probably a rule of thumb for us going forward. I think that's our comfort level.

Okay. That's helpful. And I was just wondering in terms of how this transaction came together. Was this a negotiated transaction? Or was this a bid?

Yeah. We'll outline a number of things in the S-4 as we kind of go through that process. So, I'd kind of like to defer to that point if I could.

Okay. And then on loan growth here obviously pretty good. I'm sorry if I missed it, but just wondering geographically where you've seen the strongest loan growth in particular in the C&I portfolio?

In legacy, WesBanco?

Yes.

Yeah. We're seeing it across the board actually in pretty much all of our markets. It's really nice to see in Louisville that's some fairly nice exit very sizable C&I relationship just here in the last few weeks kind of deal that would've been well north of probably 3 times north of the lending limit of Your Community Bank, the bank we've got up there. So we're starting to see traction in the Kentucky markets that had C&I capabilities, but maybe not the size of transactions that we would do. And we continue to hit well in Columbus and Cincinnati and the Pittsburgh marketplace really good lending teams there. So, C&I has pretty much been across the board. I'd like to see more borrowing on our lines of credit. I still think companies are pretty cash flush, and kind of waiting a little bit I guess to pull the trigger on different investments that they're making. Unemployment seems to be one of the bigger items I hear about more from borrowers. They can't get enough people to go and work on the next project to expand their business, so that impacts the amount of borrowing on lines of credit. So I'd like to see that change over time. But, I really can't think of a market where we're not doing well on C&I. I think we got the right teams in the right places.

Thank you very much. That’s helpful.

Sure.

Thank you. And the next question comes from Daniel Cardenas with Raymond James.

Good morning, guys.

Good morning.

Congrats on the transaction. Just one quick question as most of my other questions have been asked and answered. In terms of the conversion I'm sorry if I missed this, but when do you expect the conversion to take place?

Yeah. It would probably be within two to three months post closing. So take my comments on the closing and add another 60, 90 days after that for the conversion.

Same core.

So, then we can...

We have the same core Jim just mentioned that to me, which is going to be helpful.

All right. So then the majority of the cost saves should then begin to hit after the conversion is done, correct?

Yeah. I would think late first quarter to early second quarter at this point, but it depends on the closing obviously.

All right. That’s it for me right now. Thanks guys.

Sure.

Thank you. And as that is all the questions we have at the present time. We would like to return the floor to Todd Clossin for any closing comments.

All right. Thank you. I appreciate everyone's time this morning. We're transforming into this emerging regional financial institution. But, we are 150 year old bank and as I mentioned 100 year old trust function as well. The last three years we've done some significant expansion, very diversified into these newer high-growth markets with really good demographics and -- but we're still maintaining our focus on expense management and credit quality. I think we've been pretty consistent in terms of we've done what we said we were going to do and stayed on that path. I think we're positioned well for continued success, and we're excited about our growth opportunities. I want to thank you for joining us today, and look forward to seeing you at an upcoming investor event. Have a good day.

Thank you. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines.