Thanks, Lou. I'm about to describe a company that's changing, new markets, bigger markets, a new revenue model and a new platform. And let me tell you that story in 5 parts. First, the environment around this company changed this year, twice, both were outside of Wrap. The first came from the Supreme Court in 2025. Barnes v. Felix rejected the narrow reading on the use of force. It's the Supreme Court decision. And the question of what an officer faced in the final seconds changed. The whole encounter now matters, what happened before it, what officers knew and how the situation developed. That matters to us because our thesis has always been about creating another option earlier before an encounter reaches its most dangerous point. The second came in June. ATF classified the BolaWrap 150 as an instrument restraint and a rescue tool. Under the federal statute defining firearms and weapons, the BolaWrap 150 is neither. Now you put those side by side. The constitutional lens has widened to what they call the totality of circumstances, the totality of the encounter now matters. And the federal government has determined that our tool built to create an option earlier is no longer a weapon. That only is not a firearm, it's not a weapon. We didn't manufacture the constitutional change. We didn't control the federal classification, but we built the technology that now sits at the intersection of both. That's a structural advantage. And it doesn't exist with this clarity until just a few short months ago when all this came into fruition. That's a big one. Second. The second part is what we're selling. What we sell is changing. A BolaWrap in a holster is not a capability. It becomes a capability when an officer recognizes the moment, deploys it correctly under stress and still has that proficiency months later. We all know proficiency decades. A 1-day certification class doesn't reliably survive a year on the street. So we did something about it. The real product isn't the device. We're selling readiness and Wrap tactics is how we deliver it. We launched earlier this year. And as of this month, the core content library is complete. And here's what that changes. Instead of spending classroom time where we did instruction in person on foundational material that can't be learned beforehand, we now send digital training in advance. And now we use in-person time for what actually requires being in the room for, scenario worth of what they see in the streets every day, coaching, certification and the customer relationship. Digital does not replace the instructor. It makes the instructor more valuable. And it lets the relationship continue after the instructor leaves. Commercially, that means we can take proficiency to market as a subscription. The customer stops buying a device in a single training day. They start buying a standard of readiness that we can help them maintain. Recurring training, recurring proficiency, recurring engagement. The recurring revenue is the economic consequence of this model. And let me be precise where we are. The capability is built and it's ready to sell. This revenue is ahead of us, not behind us. The shift is real because it changes what we are from a company that closes a sale to a company that maintains a capability. Thirdly, our market just got materially larger. Everything so far has been about law enforcement. That's been our market. It's no longer the boundary of it. Start with private security. A significant portion of those officers are unarmed and in some environments, they cannot be armed. But they're still expected to manage conflict and respond when behavior escalates. When it does, there's an enormous gap between the verbal command and then calling law enforcement. And sometimes the only real choice is to act or not act. And either way, the outcome carries legal consequence and suboptimal results. That gap is operational risk, and it's a liability for employers, insurers, property owners and security providers, all of whom increasingly have to answer one question. What options were available and what did we give these people before the situation became an emergency? Well, a tool the federal government just declassified as not a firearm or not a weapon sounds to be a pretty good option for that. There are over 1.2 million licensed security officers in the United States. That's a larger population than all law enforcement, but the number isn't the point. The point is why it exists now. This isn't Wrap marketing the same product to a new segment. The regulatory change altered the addressability of the product. And the service architecture I just described gives us a way to support those customers. Fourth, we're working on federal opportunities built on the same logic. We are putting resources in Washington, D.C. The logic is early response in options and environments where use of force carries significant legal and most important public scrutiny. And we're aligning ourselves where the money is. Now I want to be disciplined here. Prospective federal opportunities are not in our guidance, and I'm not asking anyone to assign value to those contracts we haven't won. But it isn't theoretical either. We've announced this. Wrap received a purchase order from the Department of Homeland Security. And in the second quarter, we delivered training to DHS, completing what we believe is an initial phase of support to their operational requirements. Timing matters here. Public safety funding is reopening. At the same time, federal and defense investment is accelerating around autonomous systems and counter-UAS in response of those technologies. It's a matter of time, but those threats that we see across the ocean and internationally are now here in the homeland, and we need to face that reality and start thinking about the integration of those technologies into the public safety. Those sound like separate markets, but underneath them is the same problem we've been describing [ all call ]. The environments may differ, but the core capability that addresses them does not. And fifth, this is lastly, where does this all go? Everything today follows one line, a device that gives officer an earlier adoption, training that keeps our customers and keeps it usable, a commercial model that keeps customers engaged, and a regulatory change that opens our new bigger markets. Each step makes the next one possible. Our strategy reflects the convergence of funding, regulation, technology and customer need. I'm going to make some points here. We are following the funding. Public safety funding is returning. Counter-UAS is moving from defense to homeland-security and public safety. Detection is the common requirement, better sensing by time and time creates options. Our Frenel investment gives Wrap a truly differentiated position in this direction. The ATF classification expands our core addressable market. We are moving from product to readiness and consequently, subscription. These markets are connected by one strategic thesis, detect risk earlier, make better decisions, enable an earlier and more appropriate response. And the technologies we built around that thesis have valuable adjacencies. It's not just about counter-UAS, border security and maritime surveillance. We hear about autonomous platforms. We hear about ISR from the military and potentially, our technologies have space-based applications. This is the logic behind WrapShield. We're not abandoning our core. We're taking the competency at the center of Wrap earlier in invention and extending it across a much larger set of markets, customers and funded opportunities. Scot, back to you.