Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Westport Fuel Systems Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2017 Financial Results Conference Call. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode and the conference is being recorded. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to Ms. Caroline Sawamoto, Manager of Investor Relations and Communications at Westport Fuel Systems. Please go ahead.

Thank you and good morning. Welcome to Westport Fuel Systems fourth quarter and fiscal 2017 conference call which is being held to coincide with the press release containing Westport Fuel Systems financial results that went out last night. On today’s call, speaking on behalf of Westport Fuel Systems is Chief Executive Officer, Nancy Gougarty, Chief Financial Officer, Ashoka Achuthan and Vice President Human Resources, Duane Radcliffe. Attendance at this call is open to the public and to media, but questions will be restricted to the investment community. You are reminded that certain statements made in this conference call and our responses to various questions may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of U.S. and applicable Canadian Securities law and such forward-looking statements are made based on our current expectations and involve certain risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, so you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these statements. Information contained in this conference call is subject to and qualified in its entirety by information contained in the Company’s public filings. I’ll now turn the call over to Nancy.

Thank you, Caroline. Good morning and thank you for joining Westport Fuel Systems 2017 fourth quarter and year-end results conference call. 2017 was a transformative year. We strengthened all aspects of our business and laid the foundation for future of profitability and growth. We achieved everything we set out to achieve and more. We launched Westport HPDI 2.0 ready-now. You’ll hear these words often from us as we move forward since many future solutions are in the media these days. Our fully integrated solution offers our long-haul customers solution, performance and environmental that they need. The market is ready for our environmentally friendly, no-compromise performance technology. And by the way, our customers’ official order book is now open. Secondly, we focused on our portfolio and alignment of our resources. With the completion of our portfolio assessment, we divested of our industrial business for $87.5 million in two separate transactions in quarter two 2017. This has given us a sharper focus. Our new organization structure will simplify our organization by ensuring better use of our resources, especially R&D, purchasing and IT, and draw the organization together as one. Thirdly, we’ve strengthened our financial and cash position. We orchestrated a number of transactions designed to restructure our debt. We reduced our debt and extended maturities, in line with our business. The $20 million loan received in December, positions us well as we move forward in our commercial launch HPDI, impacting our working capital needs. We further strengthened our cash position by capturing over $30 million of post-merger synergies, a year earlier than planned. Also maintaining a strong focus on our working capital especially inventory with our inventory turns nearing 5 for our manufacturing businesses. In summary, the key 2017 takeaways for me are that we are moving forward into 2018 in a stronger position that will enable us to capture and capitalize the opportunities in front of us. We are very pleased with what we have accomplished but we must keep driving forward. After hearing from Ashoka on our financial performance, I will speak to you about Westport Fuel Systems strategy as we move beyond 2017. Ashoka, over to you.

Thank you, Nancy. I will begin with slide three, which provides a summary of our fourth financial performance. Please note that my comments will focus on the fourth quarter of 2017 compared to the fourth quarter of 2016 and the full years are not comparable because of the merger with Fuel Systems Solution on June 1, 2016. The fourth quarter of 2017 was significantly improved from a year ago. Increased revenue, higher gross margin, improved adjusted EBITDA performance, and we exited the year in a much strong financial position. We are pleased with our accomplishments of 2017 and look forward to building on it for even better performance in 2018. The Company is on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA during the second quarter of 2018, driven primarily by a reduction in R&D expenses related to the HPDI 2.0 program and improved performance at our joint venture, CWI. Moving on to our automotive segment on slide four. Revenues in the fourth quarter of 2017 were up 5% from the same period a year-ago and total automotive revenues for 2017 were $239.4 million, above the high end of our guidance. The fourth quarter was helped by a stronger euro versus the U.S. dollar as the transactions in our automotive business are mainly euro-denominated. In addition, we saw an uptick in OEM sales in the quarter and we’ve recognized some revenue from the shipments related to the NAFTAL award in Algeria. Gross margins were 24% in the quarter, a substantial improvement from a year-ago, due to operating efficiencies generated through post-merger synergies and lower inventory provisions. R&D and SG&A were relatively flat compared to the fourth quarter of 2016, despite the strengthening of the euro against the U.S. dollar. Note that a vast majority of R&D and SG&A segments -- expenses within…

Thank you, Ashoka. And I’m now on slide nine. There are tremendous opportunities in front of us. Just look at how the dialogue around clean energy solutions has evolved. It is no longer just about fuel pricing and neat technologies. Instead, it is about increased demand for clean vehicles and greater urgency for market-ready solutions that we have as well as our innovation and expertise. With our portfolio offerings, kits for aftermarket, zero-kilometer conversions, OEM solutions and of course for trucking our HPDI 2.0 as well as our high efficiency spark ignited product, plus CWI, we are poised now to serve the markets’ needs for clean energy products. Consumers and fleets want green solutions and our strategy is built squarely on our customers’ needs. Four simple strategies: Advanced technology leadership and solutions; focused on market and customer demand; thirdly, streamline operations and drive efficiency; and lastly, leverage key partnerships. In 2018, we work to advance these strategic priorities in the following ways. Firstly, we will advance the technology leadership by broadening our product offerings. We are accelerating development activities. And to give you a few examples of new and supporting technologies, by using our knowledge the 600 to 800-bar pressure system solutions Westport Fuel Systems is advancing the development of higher pressure HPDI system to support OEMs whom have increased their powertrain efficiency performance. We are also working on direct injection systems and injector solutions for our independent aftermarket kits to support passenger car advancements on the powertrain. We are also advancing our capabilities on existing technology including high and low pressure hydrogen components for fuel vehicles and HESI spark ignited products, an area of increased demand. Let me stress that we have learnt from our past and we will carefully evaluate investments and manage capital requirements for these exciting…

Thank you, Nancy. From a human resources perspective, our goals are to ensure our most valuable resource, our talent and people are appropriately aligned with our strategy. We are developing and retaining our key employees. We have the right leaders in place for the next phase of our growth. Our ability to navigate the significant challenges we face is directly attributed to having the right talent and leaders in place for the Company. We have been implementing a succession plan to ensure leadership structure and talent level is in place to lead Westport Fuel Systems into the next phase of growth. We’ve been planning for leadership transformation since back in 2013 when we hired our team of seasoned career industry experts. We have been able to grow internal talent and measure our team as evidenced by the appointment of Bart van Aerle, as President of CWI. In addition, leadership changes in our light duty and heavy duty OEM businesses have occurred. We continue to attract innovative, entrepreneurial and customer-focused individuals. As mentioned in our press release, Ashoka has indicated his plan to step down as CFO. An active search processes is under the way and he will stay fully-engaged until his successor is in place and an orderly transition is complete. With that, I hand back to Nancy for concluding remarks.

Thank you, Duane. Ashoka, I certainly will miss you as well others. We all thank you, Ashoka, for your leadership and your dedication during many of our challenging times. In closing, I would like to focus on execution against the 2018 priorities. We see our way to further secure our global leadership in alternative fuel solutions, systems and components, further strengthen our financial position and further focus on the customer, as well as move Westport Fuel Systems forward on a path to long-term value creation as a sustainable profitable company. I do want to thank you for your continued support and for taking time today. I will now hand the call over to the operator for questions.

Thank you. [Operator instructions] Our first question comes from Eric Stine of Craig-Hallum.

Good morning, everyone. So, I know you are not guiding to specific revenues in the new transportation segment. I again appreciate that given the changes that you are making to that structure. But, I am just wondering if you could provide any commentary or expectations for that base business? I mean, is there any -- obviously, you saw some very positive trends in the second half of 2017. Any reason to think that those trends do not follow through into 2018?

Let me start, Eric, and then, Ashoka, if you can add some other points to it, feel free. Eric, we are -- I mean, it’s very interesting, the environment that we are leaving in today, I think that some of the dynamics that we’ve seen around the anti-diesel sentiment have changed pretty significantly over the last many months as we have certainly gained speed through calendar year 2017. I would tell you that our businesses, especially independent after-market continues to benefit from that. So, I think that as we get in and have the opportunity to speak -- I guess, few weeks around what we are seeing in quarter one, we’ll be able to talk more openly about it. But, yes, I think that at this point in time, the trends that we saw in calendar year 2017, the latter part, we’re quite, I’ll say, comfortable thinking that those are going to continue to into the first part of 2018. How long they continue, I think, again, we have to continue to monitor and really understand what’s happening in the market so much. Dynamic, is changing pretty quickly here on us.

Yes. What I’d add Nancy is, Eric, as you know, we operate in over 70 countries and the dynamics of each region is different. And they tend to self hedge, so to speak, from time-to-time. And we are seeing strength in Asia Pacific Eastern Europe. So, all that is positive. However, do know that we were significantly helped by the strong euro in 2017, 2018. So, a good portion of the increment you are seeing has to do with the strength of the euro. And as I mentioned, most of the revenues of the automotive segment are euro denominated. So, useful to keep that in mind.

And maybe just turning to China, I’m curious, I know that you no longer breakout Weichai Westport volumes. But just maybe high level commentary on what you’re seeing there, just trying to judge what is going on in the Chinese market and how that sets up for potentially being there with HPDI. And I guess as part of that just an update on where things stand in the negotiations with Weichai?

Well, I think that as you know, China continues to be a market that uses natural gas vehicles pretty sizably. And I would say Weichai Westport last year hit quite good year relative to I’ll say engine uptake relative to supporting that market. I would indicate to you that relative to our Weichai discussions based on the MoU that we put at the end of the year, we are continuing down that path, Eric. The way I see it is, is that we need the right deal. China is very important market to us, but we need the right attributes in our agreement to project intellectual property and other aspects of our business. And we are moving at a pace to ensure that we get the right aspects in the contract versus just quickly moving to a contract.

Yes. That’s great. No, I absolutely agree with that. You want the right deal there. Maybe last one for me, and this is just turning to Europe. Hearing or seeing that January 1, 2019 new requirements for heavy duty trucks or OEMs to declare fuel consumption also emissions levels. Just curious what that doing to the conversations you’re having with OEMs in that market related to -- well, HPDI or high efficiency spark or any of your other technologies?

Eric, I would tell you that Europe is an interesting market. And one of the markets that we have seen, I’ll say some radical change relative to how the -- I’ll say the entire environment around clean products and the activism in the countries around trying to take diesel out of the, I’ll say the portfolio. What I would indicate to you is, is that country-by-country, we’re seeing interesting activates. Even as of yesterday, we got some positive news through our launch partner in France. Our products were deemed such that they are considered clean vehicles. And we think that all these kinds of activities that are going on through each government agencies will well position the HPDI product in that market. And certainly that has increased the dialogue with several folks in Europe that sell vehicles in that market. And as you know when we get over and we get a definitive agreement, certainly, we’ll let you know, but we’re not going to talk about it in advance.

Our next question comes from Rob Brown of Lake Street Capital Markets.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my call. I just want to start with the core automotive business. I know you haven’t given guidance, but what sort of generally that -- that business has come out of a downturn, seems to be improving nicely, had a good growth rate this quarter. But, what’s your sense on the growth rate in that business over the next sort of period, next year or two. Can that be a mid single digits growth rate business sustainably?

I think that as Ashoka said earlier that some of the growth that you saw in the fourth quarter was euro based. The good news is our business is -- we sell a lot in euros but we also buy components in euros. We do see that with the activities going on, there is -- we would expect to see a growth rate in I would say single digits, and we expect we’ll be able to hold onto that. I would say that independent aftermarket can rise much quicker than OEM applications because of the dynamics and the customer I’ll say diligence around putting things through their manufacturing processes and validation cycle. So, you know we always see the independent aftermarket being a pre-indicator of what we’ll see in the OEM side.

Yes. What I’d add to that, Nancy, is as you mentioned, we have a fair amount of technology that we are developing in this segment as well, as evidenced by the direct injection kits that we are selling. So, we expect that to continue to provide some momentum and impetus for growth.

Okay, great. Thank you. And on the European truck partner, you said the order book was open now. I know you can’t get numbers but can you give a sense of how that’s -- how the initial view is trending? Is it within your expectations, better or worse, maybe sense of direction there?

Rob, we don’t really comment on it but from what we have heard from, I’ll say, industry experts that it looks quite good. We’re pleased, I think that our launch partner has done a very good job positioning in marketing the product through the fall. And now, with the order book open, I think that we need to make sure that we get through the typical ramp up that one has you introduce new products. But, I think all indications are quite strong.

Our next question comes from Colin Rusch of Oppenheimer.

Hi. Good morning. This is Luis Amadeo for Colin. On the legacy fuel systems business, where are you seeing incremental opportunities for cost savings on the cost of goods sold lines?

I’m sorry. I missed the first part of the question.

Just on the legacy fuel systems.

On the legacy? As I mentioned, we have done -- I think that we’re just building on the back to basics activities. As you’re probably aware, last year, we’ve reduced our floor space, I think, about 40% by integrating factories together and being able to better utilize our floor space as well as our overhead costs. Those are all things that are continuing. We continue to look for opportunities to create synergy. And now, by drawing in the -- creating at a full transportation business, that will continue to help, because we are able now to leverage our resources, whether it’s R&D, finance, IT, purchasing, across the entire enterprise versus having distinct organizations supporting those. So, we continue to see all of the activities that we’re using within the transportation sector that will help the legacy business as well, in terms of the overhead structure that we have.

That’s very helpful. And, can you give us a sense on kind of the discussions around HPDI? I mean, what is the potential for a number of customers and how mature conversations are right now?

Well, I would say for HPDI, the -- there is many discussions. I would say, there are a series of different types of customers, some customers that want differentiated products, other customers that are looking to do -- that are looking to take on HPDI technologies, as it as and doing launch in various locations. I would say that interestingly, what we are finding is that we’re getting, I’ll say, a very positive response from the field. So, customers are asking for it. And we think that customer poll is always a very positive way to get I’ll say the OEMs most interested. So, the conversations are numerous. And we have got to get them into definitive agreements before we’re really going to talk about them in any public sense. But, we’re very pleased with the dialogues that are going on.

[Operator instructions] Our next question comes from Jeff Osborne of Cowen and Company.

Hey, good morning. Couple of questions on my end. I may have missed it, Ashoka, but I was wondering if you could just share with us what the constant currency year-over-year growth was in Q4? It seems like currency impacted quite a few items. Is there a way you could report constant currency results as well?

Yes. What we try and do is layout the currency impact in our MD&A. But, just to give you a sense for Q4 versus Q4, I believe there was a significant difference in the quarter, almost an 8% gain in the euro versus the U.S. dollar. For the full year, it was lower; it was almost close to 2% because it was subdued during the early part of the year. So, we’re happy to talk about it individually in terms of weighted impacts.

Got it. And then, as we think about the cadence of the OpEx lines, particularly in Q1 and Q2, it sounded like there was a lot of one-time items in G&A; you mentioned some legal settlements as well as performance bonus accruals. One, can you aggregate those two items in Q4 or whatever their dollar value was, as we think about those disappeared in Q1? And then more importantly, can you just kind of walk us through the cadence of the each of the OpEx lines, most importantly as we enter 2Q, certainly R&D will go down as you’ve articulated in the past numerous times, but the other two items that we think about [technical difficulty]?

Jeff, you’re coming through rather garbled but I think, I got the gist of your question. You were talking about unusual items and one-off items that are in OpEx. One of the reasons we go with adjusted EBITDA as an indicator of operating performance is precisely that. We try and exclude one-off items, of course, in addition to stock-based compensation and unrealized foreign exchange gain. So, the adjusted EBITDA is typically a reasonable reflection of what our ongoing operating business performance is. And we reconcile the net income or losses the case maybe to adjusted EBITDA in our financials and MD&A. So, we provide a fair amount of detail as to what the one-off items are. And on the R&D, I mean, we’ve gone on record saying that we expect the R&D once the HPDI 2.0 program is launch, that the R&D related to that segment and business would track down to about 50% in 2018 and we are tracking to that.

Got it. The last one, I think, Nancy mentioned that CWI had a stronger quarter; certainly, the units were a little bit higher than our anticipation. In particular, I was intrigued by the trucking comment. Is that the near zero that you’re seeing some upgrades or replacements in trucking towards or any comment about kind of the non-transit and refuse opportunity there would be helpful as we think about 2018 and some of the new products that CWI has.

Yes. I mean, there are a lot of interesting dynamics in CWI. As you probably know, all their products are near zero compliance now. But in the 8.9 and the 12 are fully near zero, and the 6.7 is what we call ultra-low emissions, quite close to near zero. So that is one element of the CWI product range. The other thing, as I mentioned that significantly contributed to an extraordinarily strong fourth quarter was the fact that these engines are required to OBD compliant from January 1, 2018 onwards. And we saw a significant amount of prebuy, particularly on the refuse and the transit side, related to this. They would rather have engines that are non-OBD compliant, if you will, to align with their rest of the fleet. So, there was a fair amount of pre-buy in Q4. The other reason, I mentioned we are expecting a weak Q1 for CWI was the fact that these OBD compliant engines need to be integrated into vehicles. And the OEMs, the trucking OEMs are not quite there in terms of being able to integrate those engines. So, we are seeing weakness in Q1, but we expect that to pick-up very strongly in Q2 and the outlying quarters.

Perfect. And the last one, I appreciate allowing so many questions. But the CapEx expectations for 2018, I know you mentioned most of the HPDI is behind you. But, any sense of what’s in the budget that you can share?

No. We don’t guide specifically to CapEx. But, as I mentioned, the bulk of HPDI spend is behind us with our spend in 2017. I believe it was approximately $25 million in capital expenditures in 2017. Directionally, you can expect to see somewhere about half that range is probably the best.

This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Caroline Sawamoto for any closing remarks.

Thank you for joining us today. If you have follow-up questions, feel free to reach out to our Investor Relations team. And thanks again and see you next time.

This concludes today’s conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating and have a pleasant day.