Operator Good day, and welcome to the Willdan Group’s First Quarter 2019 Conference. Today’s conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Tony Rossi of Financial Profiles. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone and thank you for joining us to discuss Willdan Group’s financial results for the first quarter ended March 29th, 2019. With us today from management are Thomas Brisbin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Stacy McLaughlin, Chief Financial Officer; and Mike Bieber, President of Willdan Group. Management will review prepared remarks and then we’ll open up the call to your questions. Statements made in the course of today’s conference call which are not purely historical, are forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties and it’s important to note that the Company’s future results could differ materially from those in any such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results differ materially and other risk factors are listed from time to time in the Company’s SEC reports, including, but not limited to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 28th, 2018 and subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. The Company cautions investors not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements made during the course of this conference call. Willdan Group disclaims any obligation and does not undertake to update or revise any forward looking statements made today. In addition to GAAP financial results, Willdan also provides non-GAAP financial measures that we believe enhance investors ability to analyze our business trends and performance. Our non-GAAP measures include net revenue, adjusted EPS and adjusted EBITDA. We believe net revenue allows for an improved measure of the revenue derived from the work performed by our employees. Adjusted EPS and adjusted EBITDA are supplemental measures of operating performance which removes the impact of certain expense items from our operating results. GAAP reconciliations for all of these non-GAAP measures are included at the end of the earnings release we issued today. With that, I’d now like to turn the call over to Chief Financial Officer, Stacy McLaughlin. Stacey?

Thanks, Tony. I’d like to add my welcome to those joining us on today’s call. I’ll start with an overview of our income statement, then our balance sheet and finally, our guidance. Total contract revenue for the first quarter of 2019 increased 68.1% to $91.8 million from $54.6 million for the first quarter of 2018. The increase was driven by growth in our energy segment primarily related to the contributions from our recent acquisitions of Lime Energy, NAM and the Weidt Group. Net revenue defined as contract revenue minus subcontractor services and other direct costs was $40.8 million, an increase of 33.8% from $30.5 million in the year ago quarter. Within the energy segment, net revenue increased by 64.8%, within the engineering and consulting segment, net revenue decreased by 1.8%. Direct costs of contract revenue were $65.9 million for the first quarter of 2019, an increase of 87.8% from $35.1 million in the same period last year. The increase was primarily related to the growth in contract revenue resulting from the Lime Energy, NAM and the Weidt Group acquisitions. Our direct costs of contract revenue were 71.7% of our total contract revenue in the first quarter of 2019 compared with 64.2% in the same period of the prior year. The increase was primarily attributable to the impact of Lime Energy which has programs that utilize a higher percentage of subcontractors as well as a temporary reduction in revenue from certain higher margin energy contracts. General and administrative expenses for the first quarter were $26.2 million compared to $17.6 million for the prior year period. The increase was primarily driven by higher salaries and wages, payroll taxes and employee benefits largely related to the personnel added through the acquisitions of Lime Energy, NAM and the Weidt Group. In the quarter, intangible…

Thanks, Stacey and good afternoon, everyone. During the first quarter, we made excellent progress on integrating our acquisitions and collaborating across the organization to drive new business development opportunities. As we indicated on our last earnings call, we expected the first quarter to be somewhat soft due to a lower level of activity from two of our largest clients, LADWP and Duke. As a result, our teams were underutilized in the quarter, which negatively impacted our reported results. We have completed negotiations for program execution and expansions on both programs. The program expansions that we have been awarded will positively impact our forecast for 2019. We’ll update you further as the programs ramp up. LADWP has added a new program focused on increasing energy efficiency throughout the Los Angeles Unified School District. Duke Energy has been expanded to include additional states. As we have indicated in the past, when we demonstrated an ability to consistently execute well on programs and deliver the targeted energy savings, there are excellent opportunities to expand the relationships with utilities. Both of these relationships come from Lime Energy and in both cases, we believe the expanded resources and capabilities that the combination of Willdan and Lime can provide were key elements in the decision by both utilities to award us these new and expanded programs. Outside of these program wins, we continue to see good success in our business development efforts. For example, we recently signed a contract with the City of New York to address energy efficiency for city owned buildings. Our utility work, Con Ed and National Grid and work for New York City has positioned as well to address high rise buildings. There are greater than 50,000 buildings that will be required to become more energy efficient. We’ve also been awarded a…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] We’ll take our first question from Craig Irwin with ROTH Capital Partners. Please go ahead, sir.

Good evening and thanks for taking my questions. So I may have missed this in the prepared remarks, but did you share an organic growth number for the first quarter?

Craig, it was minus 5% for the first quarter. It’s on our investors report.

Got it. So then that would be Lime’s seasonality and some seasonality in the other projects, I’m guessing slow starts, et cetera?

Well we’ve referenced two of the major contracts with the slow starts, because the renegotiation and the extensions, but overall it’s a slow start to the first quarter. So that was a little spread everywhere plus the two big ones.

Got it, got it. No, this is construction, right. So I guess everybody is well aware sort of stickiness that starts sometimes. Then if we could talk a little bit more about LADWP and Duke. Congratulations on those expanded contracts. How quickly does this actually come on. I know when you get new scope, new services, new geographies there’s always some finalization of the pricing and local agreements and work agreements and things like this. How soon until we see this actually layering into the P&L for Willdan? Is this a primary driver of your higher guidance for this year?

So, Craig. Here’s the numbers for you first. The LADWP program has expanded by $28 million. And the Duke program has expanded by $14 million. However, we’re in discussions with the client about over what period of time we burn that revenue. Because you’re right, we can’t just ramp up that quickly and burn all that. So that will not hit at all in 2019. We don’t extend well out into 2020. We’re currently -- we have the contract signed. We’re working on finalizing measure pricing and we’ll start the sales later this quarter. So that means that revenue would start to hit in Q3 and of course, then ramp up in Q4 for those two expansions and then it’ll probably continue to ramp into the first part of next year.

Great. Next I wanted to ask about is the overall RSA activity out there. Can you comment on how things are moving for the different major utilities? Did the RSA for San Diego actually get released? Is there an opportunity to submit there in the short-term? And how far off do you think credibly some of these awards are? Is this something that we could see potentially this summer or is it more likely to be sort of toward the end of the year?

The San Diego Gas and Electric RFP is out. We’ve been shortlisted for this large and the small programs. The proposals are due around July 1 let’s say, and June 15th and award, or else an award are expected in the first quarter for San Diego. They were first out of the gate on the abstract and then came SCE and then came PG&E. We expect PG&E to have a request for proposals out within the next couple of weeks.

Excellent, excellent. So SCE same thing probably toward the end of the year and PG&E as well probably toward the end of the year?

They’re doing pretty good.

Yes. I’d call it ahead of schedule.

Yes.

Then another market that we maybe talked about a little bit less, is New Jersey. I know Adam Procell and the team you brought on with Lime has some very deep connections there. How are things progressing in New Jersey and local markets like New York? Are you seeing additional scope likely to be awarded this year or maybe at some point in 2020?

New Jersey, we don’t expect to be awarded this year. We expect that in a 2020 timeframe of the competition. What’s your question on New York?

I mean, Con Ed and New York. I know you guys had done business there for quite a while. But how are things progressing, any update as far as additional scope?

Yes 10 years we’ve been the incumbent, the Recompete’s on the Street. We submitted. We’re waiting for award and we expect to ramp up or an increase in what they’re going to do.

Excellent, excellent. And then maybe can you comment specifically about the integration of Lime Energy. I know this is largely a bolt-on and largely supplementary services and geographies. There were some very, very conservative assumptions around synergies out of this acquisition. Do you still expect to have minimal synergies given the structure the way you brought the two companies together? And is there anything about the progress of the cross integration maybe bringing not just Willdan services over to Lime customers, but Lime capabilities and services over to Willdan customers. Anything there could be helpful.

I would say, Craig it’s going just like we thought it would. We’re operating just according to our plan. The integration is going well. We’re converting first the ERP system later this year. So that’s an internally focused effort and then externally the California Procurements will integrate Lime’s capabilities as well as some of the other competitions we’re going after around the country. We’ve got a number of joint proposal activities that have already occurred and will continue to occur all summer. So I’d say it’s happening just like we expected to and the demonstration I guess of our early efforts are the expansions of LADWP and Duke. That was good news.

Yes, definitely, very good news. Well congratulations on the progress. I’ll hop back in the queue and let one of the other analyst to ask questions.

[Operator Instructions] We’ll take our next question from Moshe Katri with Wedbush Securities. Please go ahead.

Hey guys, thanks. Appreciate the updated guidance for the year. Can you give us some color on how we should think about Q2 and then the progression from there. I think you’re talking about a nice potential acceleration during the second half, but it would be great if we can at least get some modeling done into the quarter and then I have another follow up.

Yes, Q2 should ramp up nicely. That’s already happening right now, Moshe. Q3 should be our biggest quarter. It normally is and this year we would expect that to be true. Q4 will be less than Q3 and then typically we step down in Q1 of next year. So that’s kind of how the year unfolds. And you’re right that the progression into Q3 and Q4 this year should be very good mainly because of the expansions of the existing programs we’ve already got. We won’t -- we’re starting the work now but we won’t recognize revenue until probably the first part of Q3 and into Q4. So, that’s how I think it should unfold.

Okay. And then again, going back to the color that we’re looking for would you expect a 45% of your annual revenues to get generated during the first half and then 55% during the second half. Is that a good way of looking at it?

Doing the math in my head. I would say probably slightly more in the second half than you just indicated. Probably slightly more than.

Those like 40, 50.

Yes it’s, more like that.

Okay. Okay. That’s fair.

And I think that probably consistent with a $40 million print on the net revenue for Q1. Yes.

Yes. And then how should we think about margins starting in Q2?

Our Q2 margins will increase significantly. Q3 margins should be the highest, probably. That’s typically the case that’s our high utilization quarter. And then Q4 margins come down just a little bit from Q3.

Okay. Okay. That’s helpful. And then apologies if this is a basic question. How do we think -- how should we think about setting up or transitioning or setting up the infrastructure for some of those new deals that are coming on board? In terms of cost, personnel, how do these actually work? Are they a bit different than what you’re doing typically? And will there be a initial impact on margins as you are kind of setting up or starting to get some scale on some of those new deals?

Tom’s pointing at me, I’m pointing at him so. So typically there are some ramp up costs in new programs. We generally start with a higher percentage of subcontractor work because that allows you to ramp up more quickly. Then as programs mature over the next few years, sometimes in some instances the percent of subcontractor work comes down. That depends on the program. Other than that we have no indication to think that the margins will be any different in the California work than we’re currently seeing. There’s no indication of that right now, either up or down. So yes that’s kind of where we’re at.

And typically does it take a quarter or two in terms of setting up that infrastructure in terms of kind of ramping or in terms of maybe starting maybe ultimately winding off the subcontractor lease?

In this case we’re already working for these customers and we often have what I’ll call a smaller starter program. Other programs are then going to be rolled into what we’re procuring. So we have people who are experienced on most of these types of programs. So I don’t believe that the ramp up would be as problematic as a brand new customer or a brand new geography?

Perfect. Final question, some color on the integral analytics. How did we do there in the quarter? How does it look for the second half and I believe when we’re marketing you spoke about a new product/solution that kind of incorporates what these guys are doing. So where are we in terms of then try to monetize it? Thanks.

Yes. Integral analytics is by its nature and by the change in the revenue recognition model just last year going to be lumpy. And so Q4 they had a banner of Q4, Q1 this quarter they had a weak Q1 and they have a very good pipeline for the rest of the year. So that’s the way it will always go with integral analytics. It’ll be almost binary way up or way down. We are integrating integral analytics mathematical tools onto our existing energy efficiency projects. We’re doing that in proposals and on pilot scale and we’re trying to roll that out across the country to be able to mathematically optimize or target, better target the areas in which you want to put energy efficiency. Right now most of these energy efficiency programs sometimes they identify load pockets but they don’t get down specifically to the highest value customers and integral analytics has the ability to tell you exactly where you should target. So we’re starting that process and that will roll out over the next year, year and a half.

Great, thanks.

And there are no further telephone questions at this time. I’d like to turn the conference back over to management for any additional or closing remarks.

Okay. I would like to thank all of you for participating in our call today and for your continued interest in Willdan, have a great day. Thank you very much.

And once again, this does conclude today’s conference. Thank you all for your participation. You may now disconnect.