Good morning and welcome to Whirlpool Corporation's Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. Today's call is being recorded. Joining me today are Marc Bitzer, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Roxanne Warner, our Chief Financial Officer, Juan Carlos Fuente, our Executive President of North America and Global Strategic Sourcing, and Ludovic Bouffiz, our Executive President of KitchenAid Small Appliances in Latin America. Our remarks today track with a presentation available on the investor section of our website at whirlpoolcorp.com. Before we begin, I want to remind you that as we conduct this call, we will be making forward-looking statements to assist you in better understanding Whirlpool Corporation's future expectations. Our actual results could differ materially from the statements due to many factors discussed in our latest 10-K, 10-Q, and other periodic reports. We also want to remind you that today's presentation includes non-GAAP measures outlined in further detail at the beginning of our presentation. We believe these measures are important indicators of our operations as they exclude items that may not be indicative of results from our ongoing business operations. We also think the adjusted measures will provide you with a better base for analyzing trends in our ongoing business operations. Listeners are directed to the supplemental information package posted on the investor relations section of our website for the reconciliations of non-GAAP items to the most directly comparable GAAP measures. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. Following our prepared remarks, the call will be open for analyst questions. As a reminder, we ask that participants ask no more than two questions. With that, I'll turn the call over to Marc Bitzer.

Thanks, Scott, and good morning, everyone. Today, we're going to discuss our 2025 results and share our expectations for 2026. Before we dive in, I would like to acknowledge three leadership promotions we have recently made. By their new faces or rather new voices on this call, they together represent over seventy years of experience within Whirlpool. Each one of them brings deep operational, strategic, and financial experience to a new role. Let me start by handing it over to Roxanne to introduce herself.

Thanks, Marc, and good morning, everyone. I am honored to step into the role of Chief Financial Officer of Whirlpool Corporation. Having spent the last eighteen years at Whirlpool, I have a deep appreciation for our operations and a firm commitment to driving long-term shareholder value. Prior to my current role, I served as Executive Vice President Finance and Corporate Controller. In 2021, I was the Chief Financial Officer of our Europe segment where I led both finance and integrated supply chain operations and supported the organization through our European divestiture. Joining Whirlpool in 2008, I have had the privilege of holding numerous roles across cost management, commercial, and corporate finance, including leading the finance functions of our US laundry and US sales organization in North America. In 2019, I had the honor of leading investor relations where I connected with both our investors and analysts. I look forward to reestablishing those connections and creating new ones. I'm excited to work alongside the leadership team and our employees to deliver our next chapter of growth. I will turn it over to Juan Carlos.

Thanks, Roxanne, and good morning, everybody. It's a privilege to be speaking with you today as I start my new role leading MDA North America in global strategic sourcing. I joined Whirlpool as an intern in 1996, and I have spent the last thirty years in almost all functions and regions of the corporation. While my recent years were spent abroad, I have been in North America before. Where I previously led our laundry business unit, the core of our product portfolio, as well as served as general manager for our business with Home Depot. Having held these roles before, I know that winning in North America requires continuing to strengthen our brand and product portfolio, enhance our customer relationships, as well as our world-class supply chain to fulfill our purpose of improving life at home. I'm very excited to return to the MDA North America business. I'm looking forward to building on our powerful foundation and creating value for our stakeholders. Now I'll hand the call to Ludo.

Thanks, Juan Carlos, good morning, everyone. Expanding my role beyond KitchenAid small appliances to our MDA Latin America business is an exciting opportunity. It's an opportunity to drive growth for both an iconic global premium brand and now iconic local brands such as Brastemp. One of our most dynamic high-growth segments. I have spent the better part of my twenty-year career with Whirlpool developing our products and brands. From inception to industrialization and to commercialization. I went from leading critical categories in EMEA and in the US to driving our product marketing organization in North America. These roles, combined with my more recent position in the global product organization, and my current responsibilities with KitchenAid, have given me a unique vantage point on how to drive innovation and cost competitiveness to win in every channel and every market. I look forward to this tremendous opportunity to accelerate growth for our company. Now I'll turn the call back over to Marc to provide an overview of our 2025.

Thanks, Ludo. I'm very excited about these leadership appointments and have every confidence that we have the right team in place to continue to execute on our strategic priorities. As you're well aware, 2025 marked a difficult year with unforeseen challenges in particular for our North American business. There are two particular challenges that our business faced. One, tariffs. As domestic producers, we will ultimately benefit from the tariffs that were put in place, there is no question in my mind. However, in 2025, we absorbed roughly $300 million of tariffs largely for components and some finished products, but the industry did not yet move on pricing. This might be surprising given that our competitors are two to four times more exposed to tariffs than we are, but the significant amount of inventory preloading ahead of the tariffs and the uncertainty of a tariff framework might explain the delay of industry price moves. The good news is that we observed a meaningful change in industry pricing and promotions after mid-December into the MLK holiday and the upcoming Presidents' Day. Two, housing. As we discussed in prior calls, existing home sales are the most important driver for appliance demand and in particular for discretionary demand. Which inherently is more margin attractive. However, mortgage lock-in effect coupled with lower consumer confidence, led to a thirty-year low of existing home sales. But there's no doubt about an eventual multiyear housing recovery, 2025 did not yet unlock the housing sector. With these macro challenges in mind, delivered results largely in line with the prior year. Our global organic revenues were essentially flat, and we're pleased with the MDA North America market share gains during 2025. Our operating margins were slightly below 5% largely driven by the intense promotional environment in North America during Q3,…

Thanks, Marc. Turning to slide six. I'll provide an overview of our full-year results. As Marc mentioned, our global organic revenue was flat to the prior year and we delivered significant cost takeout to help mitigate the incremental cost of tariffs. We did not see the industry pricing adjustments to offset these incremental tariff costs in 2025. And the prolonged intense promotional environment unfavorably impacted our margins. Ultimately, we delivered a full-year ongoing EBIT margin of 4.7% and a full-year ongoing earnings per share of $6.23. Given the challenging operational environment in 2025, these results are proof of our resilience and commitment to focus on what we control. We generated $78 million of free cash flow which was unfavorably impacted by the timing of tariff payments and higher inventory necessary to support our new products. In November, we executed the previously announced India share sale transaction which resulted in a reduction of our majority stake from 51% to a minority stake of 40%. Proceeds were utilized to pay down debt in line with our capital allocation priorities. We are pleased with the results of this transaction and our retained position. We will continue to evaluate all options to further reduce our debt throughout 2026 in line with our guidance and capital allocation priorities. We continue to fund a healthy dividend returning approximately $300 million to shareholders in 2025. Turning to Slide seven, I will provide an overview of our fourth quarter and full-year results for our business segments, starting with MDA North America. On a full-year basis, net sales excluding currency was largely flat year over year. We saw continued strong share gains throughout the fourth quarter driven by the momentum of our new product launches. Promotional activity remained intense. As industry pricing did not reflect the cost of tariffs.…

Thanks, Roxanne. Turning to slide nine, I will cover how our MDA North America is well-positioned to further organic growth and margin expansion. Our structural drivers for value creation in North America are stronger than ever. The first driver is our strong lineup of new products. As Marc mentioned earlier, in 2025, we transitioned over 30% of our product portfolio to new products, and we're seeing a very strong response from both our trade customers and consumers. These new products gain significantly more floor space than their predecessors within the key retailers. Resulting in share gains as we exit the year and we have more innovation coming in 2026. The second driver is our unique position as a domestic manufacturer in the tariff environment. Our US manufacturing legacy started over a hundred and ten years ago and we never left. We produce more of our appliances in the US than any of our industry peers who, in contrast, only produce approximately 25% of what they sell in the US in the US. Our US factories use approximately 96% American steel and work with thousands of US suppliers. We operate some of the largest appliance plants in the world, and we continue to make investments to strengthen our domestic position. The tariffs imposed by the current administration aim to support US manufacturers like Whirlpool and we're starting to see positive signs suggesting that the tariffs will become a tailwind. As Roxanne mentioned, we have also observed a less promotional MDA industry throughout January in comparison to the same period in previous years. This suggests that the tariff costs for importers are beginning to impact their business and therefore the elevated promotions we saw last year are proving to be unsustainable in the long term. The last driver is the state of…

Thanks, Juan Carlos. Turning to Slide 12, let me explain why we believe the MDA Latin America business is uniquely positioned to grow. MDA Latin America has enormous growth potential given the low market penetration of appliances in the industry's compound annual growth rate projections of approximately 4% to 5%. Our MDA business in Latin America has a sustained track record of value creation rooted in the strength of our products and brands. And is ideally positioned to take advantage of this industry growth. We hold the number one share position in the region, supported by our strong historical presence in Brazil, the Brastemp and Consul brands. These are leading brands in consumer preference that have held this position for decades as a result are present in more than half of Brazilian homes. Whirlpool brand also holds the number one position in terms of preference in the second largest market in Latin America, Mexico. In many other smaller markets around the region. We have built an exceptionally strong infrastructure across the region. We have a well-established supply base, some of the largest plants in the world, great distribution and service network, and a direct-to-consumer channel representing approximately 20% of our sales. We are therefore incredibly well-positioned to continue to grow profitably in this very large region. Turning to Slide 13, let me introduce one of the tools to drive that growth in 2026. A new lineup of refrigerators coming to the Brazilian market. This quarter. Brastemp, our premium home appliance brand in Brazil, is launching a new portfolio of products in two of the most critical categories in the market, top mount and bottom mount refrigerators. These new refrigerators offer increased capacity, improved energy efficiency, and bring a refreshed aesthetic to consumers' kitchens. They are poised to do very, very…

Thanks, Ludo. Turning to Slide 17, I will review our guidance for 2026. Given the recently executed transaction to reduce our majority stake in India, we have provided a reset baseline for our long-term targets in 2025 results. These targets reflect our business performance expectations during a mid-cycle which will be after housing recovery has started but before it reaches the peak. On a like-for-like basis, we expect revenue growth of approximately 5% in 2026. Our new product launches are expected to deliver growth in MDA North America and we expect continued strength in our SDA Global and international businesses. On a like-for-like basis, we expect 80 to 110 basis points of ongoing EBIT margin expansion 2026 EBIT margin of approximately 5.5 to 5.8%. Free cash flow is expected to deliver $400 million to $500 million or approximately 3% of net sales driven by improved earnings, and significant inventory optimization. We expect full-year ongoing earnings per share of approximately $7. This includes an adjusted effective tax rate of approximately 25% which is an increase compared to 2025, and impacts 2026 ongoing earnings per share by approximately $2. Turning to Slide 18, we show the assumptions supporting our 2026 ongoing EBIT margin guidance. We expect a positive price mix impact of 175 basis points from our recent and future new product launches, and benefit from our previously announced pricing actions in a reduced promotional environment. While we have seen interest rates beginning to ease, we do not expect a material catalyst for new home sales in early 2026. As mentioned before, we do see the potential for faster recovery of existing home sales and thus discretionary demand, but at this point, we're not factoring this into our guidance. We will drive further actions to optimize our cost structure and expect 100…

Thanks, Marc. Turning to Slide 23. I will review our capital allocation priorities, which are consistent with what we shared in 2025. Funding our organic growth is critical to delivering innovative products that meet our consumers' needs. We will continue to invest in product innovation, digital transformation, and cost efficiency projects with approximately $400 million of capital expenditure expected this year. Secondly, we are committed to reducing our debt levels. We expect to pay down at least $400 million of debt in 2026 continuing our commitment to deleverage. Thirdly, we are committed to returning cash to shareholders through funding a healthy dividend. We will continue to evaluate our dividend funding and ensure it aligns with our progress toward our long-term goals. As a reminder, the dividend is approved quarterly by the Board of Directors. Turning to Slide 24. Let me summarize what you heard today. Despite navigating a year of significant external shocks, led by the substantial cost increase of tariffs. Our 2025 results were largely in line with the prior year. We maintained our track record of course takeouts and delivered cost reduction of $200 million to help offset the impact of tariff costs. Introduced a record number of new products proving their early success through flooring expansion and share gains in 2025. As we look forward into 2026, we have another strong pipeline of new products coming. With industry pricing expected to normalize, and structural cost takeout actions yielding results. We expect margins and free cash flow to strengthen. We expect the SDA global business to continue to be a bright spot. With sustained momentum from new products resulting in significant year-over-year growth. Lastly, we continue to be extremely well-positioned to fully capture the benefits of the housing market recovery. As it begins to turn in a favorable direction. I'm confident in our strategy and our path forward will create shareholder value. Now we will end our formal remarks and open it up for questions.

At this time, I would like to remind everyone in order to ask a question, press star, then the number one on your telephone keypad. Your first question comes from the line of David MacGregor from Longbow Research. Your line is open.

Yes. Good morning, everyone. And Roxanne, it's David speaking with you again. Good morning. I guess, Marc, I wanted to start by just unpacking the 26 flat industry units number. And you referenced no expectations for an increase in discretionary or builder, which would I guess, imply a flat replacement demand outlook. But you also, at the same time, talked about seeing strength in replacement demand. So I guess I just wanted to better understand that. And maybe within the context of that answer, could just talk about the extent to which you're pent up demand, as you had referenced. And then I have a follow-up.

Yeah. So so so, David, again, you as you well know, there's two main components of replacement demand, discretionary demand. The replacement demand what we base that is continues to stay on a very, very healthy structural level. And that is still on the tail end of post-COVID. We saw a significant higher use of appliance and that just drives a lot of healthy ongoing replacement demand. As a reminder, as everybody knows, while we like that part of our business, it's not necessarily the most margin accretive part of the business. The discretionary side and to be also very clear, again, we have not factored in upside in the discretionary side. The discretionary side would have to largely come from increased remodeling activities and, in particular, faster or uptick of existing home sales. So that is not factored in even though I think there's a certain chance that, you know, depending on what the mortgage rate environment will do, that we will start a slow unfreezing of existing home sales. But again, as a reminder, it's not factored in our numbers, in our guidance. And as such, could potentially provide an upside. But, again, let's just see how that evolves. So far, as you look in the rearview mirror on 2025, the existing home sales were just on a very low level and got stuck there pretty much.

And you had mentioned pent-up demand. I guess just what your assessment is at this point. Of where that stands, and then I have a follow-up.

I mean, I think, David, there's a very significant pent-up demand tied towards the housing. And then I'm not gonna repeat I think everybody knows. I mean, this the entire housing market is in terms of new home sales, is undersupplied in the tune of 3 million homes. Now that will not happen overnight, but it just means just the new homes will spill a multiyear uptick on demand. The other side is and this is and, again, that could potentially materialize earlier. The discretionary side, which comes with remodeling or existing home sales, I think, could accelerate faster than the new homes. And very significant potential out there, as you know, but the consumer has equity. Equity in particular in the form of housing stock. So the perceived equity the consumer has is there, it will take an uptick also in consumer sentiment to unleash that. That, in my view, could happen faster than the new home sites. But again, it's right now, we're you all know, we're in a very uncertain global environment, I would say if consumer sentiment changes, I think you could see an uptick already this year on the discretionary side. But, certainly, it's just it's only a question of when it's not if there's a multiyear pent-up demand still waiting out there.

Okay. Great. And then second is follow-up. I guess, you had a very substantial product refresh 2025, and along with that, of course, comes elevated flooring costs. What's the benefit in '26 from the relief on the flooring costs?

To North American market? David, you're highlighting a very important point. Just as a recap, and I think many of you listening understand that know that when you have a lot of new product introductions, and we as we highlighted in particular North America, we had the highest amount of product introductions in more than a decade, and it's been massive. You have, of course, it starts acting with factories. You have phase-in and phase-out costs. Of course, you don't run the factory in the most efficient way if you at one point, take down production and you ramp it up, you have inefficiencies in there. You have inefficiencies in warehousing inventory because for some period, and you saw that all in Q4, you hold inventory pretty much on phase-out and phase-in. And then lastly, you have very significant flooring costs. Which just come with flooring with products now. Ultimately, it's like a return investment. You get your return on these flooring costs, but it all hit our P&L large in '25. So in particular, in the back half, and I'm not trying to take it as infused. It's just there. And it was it's an investment against the future. So as we turn the page into '26, first of all, you have the absence of these introduction costs, which is an uplift. And second of all, now I have a full benefit of a higher flooring. We know because, of course, we get weekly sellout numbers. We know when new products are not just floored, best selling. So we're very pleased with the sellout. And so not only do you have the absence of a cost, but you also have tailwinds in form of a demand of new products. So I don't wanna give a precise number how much that means, but, of course, that is a very beyond a normalization promotion environment, that's a key driver of where we see the improvement in North America.

Your next question comes from the line of Michael Rehaut from JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Great. Thanks very much. Good morning, everyone. My first question is for good morning. First question is for Roxanne and Juan Carlos. Congratulations, obviously, stepping into your new roles, your expanded roles, and Roxanne a pleasure working with you again. Wanted each of your perspectives on you know, if there's any kind of how are you gonna approach the jobs over the next couple of years? Obviously, you know, the business has had a number of challenges particularly in the in the North America margin. Challenges. Through various you know, macro, tariffs, you know, promotional, etcetera. What's the road back from a margin perspective over the next few years? I mean, obviously, you continue to look at your kind of tried and true playbook of cost savings, better mix, etcetera. I know a lot of this is also macro led with the challenges in the existing home repair model market. But I'm wondering if you're looking at anything maybe a little bit bigger picture structural or kind of changing strategy, then that might kinda jump start you know, the pathway back, or is it going to be more of, you know, you know, the initiatives that you've done already. And expanding on that.

Thanks, Michael. I will answer from a global perspective, and then I will move it over to Juan Carlos. First of all, thanks. It's great working with you again as well. The number one priority for us continues to be, one, debt pay down, and I will continue to have that focus. Driving that is our continued focus on cash and working capital. You see in 2026, we have a guidance of $400 million to $500 million of free cash flow, and that is imperative that we drive our inventory down. And so that is going to be a number one focus for us. And then overall, we will continue to deliver on cost takeout as we've done over the years. And absolutely in 2026. Price mix is going to be absolutely a huge focus. One, on seeing the pricing from an overall industry, but then secondly, delivering on the benefits that Marc just touched on as it relates to our new product launches. With that, I'll turn it over to Juan Carlos.

Yep. So thank you very much for the congratulations. I am super happy and excited to be in this new role. Like I mentioned at the beginning, I've been in North America before, and I was part of the I would say, in the global financial crisis two thousand and eight. Moved in 2008, and then, obviously, that happened. So I was together with Marc, in that turnaround in 2009, 2010, and not that those tools will be working moving forward, but I think by like, look Roxanne mentioned and we mentioned before, with the new products that we're putting in place, with aggressive cost take actions that we have, and, obviously, with our manufacturing footprint that is extremely strong in North America, we believe that focusing lasering focusing on that we we could turn the business around.

Great. No. Appreciate that. I guess, secondly, you know, the sales growth like for like of 5%, and it looks like that's against a volume outlook of flat. If I'm understanding the segment regional segment guidance you know, by and large, I guess that that results in a balance of price and mix driving the growth. I wanted to make sure I'm understanding that right and how much exactly you're anticipating to come from price versus mix? And lastly, if that 5% also I would assume applies broadly to the North American segment as well?

Michael, it's Marc. First of all, the 5% in North America or globally, but directionally also reflective of what we have in mind in North America. Also, on a global level, we showed 1.75 percentage points coming from price mix, there is a healthy mix portion because we have a lot of new products and premium products. But there is also pricing comes with a more normalized environment. So what we showed on a global level is also true on a direction on North America level. So, yes, there is also in our organic, in North America, call it a two to three points of unit growth in there because we we know these new products have been picking up market share, and we expect them to carry over into next year. So short answer is there's a portion of price mix. The price mix also has a good content element of mix in there. But there is also some unit growth into our North America assumptions.

Your next question comes from the line of Mike Dahl from RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Marc, I was hoping you could touch on or your team could touch on just more specifically the comments around the promotional cadence then also your own actions around your promotional pricing plans. Can you be more specific or quantitative about what you've seen in recent weeks and how that gives you the better confidence ahead of Presidents' Day, think quantification would help if you can.

Yeah. So, Michael, so let me maybe give you a lot more color on what we've seen in North America up until Presidents' Day. Obviously, I can't comment on the go forward. So first of all, in Q4, in some ways, we've seen two parts of a market in Q4. One was the nonpromotional period where we had the new product in there, where we actually like what we saw and we picked up market share. The promotional period itself was intense. By any definition, and think once the competitors announce their numbers, you would see it was intense. We made a conscious decision to hold our ground during this promotion. Period. We did not pick up share during the promotion period. But, frankly, it was a very costly investment. I mean, there's no denial, and you see that in our number. What difference we saw after a particular backfiring is an event well, the meaningful difference is post-Black Friday, the prices, the promotion prices immediately recovered, pretty much exactly what we got after. And that is, for those of you following the steel different from prior years. Very often, saw that either retails or competitors did not sell all the products they want. Like, Friday, prices were extended well in some cases to January. We did not see that last year. So as intense as the promotional period was, it also ended pretty abruptly. And these higher prices held now for pretty much six weeks, now we all know it's six weeks. It's not fifty-two weeks, but it's six weeks. And that is very different from prior year. We saw a meaningful price change already on MLK. We have, of course, already announced our prices with trade towards Presidents' Day, and what we see is these call it, this normalized promotional environment certainly held for Presidents' Day. So we saw a big difference the last six weeks. Again, is that a full extrapolation for the full year? No. We all don't know. This is a competitive environment. But at least we saw over the last six weeks that the industry's finally starting to reflect the full cost of tariff in the prices.

Okay. Got it. Thanks for that, Marc. And just to dovetail on that, can you give us a sense then of within your margin guidance? And I'm thinking specifically the 6% for North America how you envision the cadence between first half and second half?

I mean, there's several elements coming in that cadence. First of all, you will not see the 6% throughout the full year. And there's Q1, in particular, will be still impacted by a number of factors. First of all, we just see now the pricing, a more positive pricing coming through. So it's starting to build, and that is still a good guy. A negative side, we will curtail production. We said we will control inventories, and we're correct, but we had too much of inventories. That will be a burden on our Q1 numbers in North America because we will adjust inventory. As Roxanne highlighted before, cash is a key priority, and we take that very seriously. So you will have the inventory reduction going against us in Q1. But prior starts moving our favor. And on top of that, you have now in Q1, contrary to last year, you had the full cost of tariffs in there. So there's a number of factors. So Q1 will still be clearly below that 6%. And as of Q2, we expect this low and gradual buildup.

Your next question comes from the line of Rafe Jadrosich from Bank of America. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. I wanted to ask on the capital allocation for the year. This free cash flow guidance of $400 million to $500 million the $200 million dividend and then, I think, $400 million of debt pay down. Is a bit of a funding gap there. So can you just help us understand how we get to the full, like, debt paydown and dividend relative to the free cash flow guidance?

Rafe, good morning. One of the things that we touched on in the script earlier as well is that we are pleased with the India transaction that we have executed, which turned our majority stake from 51% to 40%. As of this time, we will retain that position, but we will continue to evaluate all options to further reduce our debt in line with the debt pay down guidance of $400 million.

Got it. So are there additional India sales, like, you can better than the in the guidance, or is that just an option that's sort of on the table? There are other things outside of India that could be done to generate cash.

Yeah. So so, Rafe, you know, it's Marc. And so Roxanne said, right now, we feel very comfortable with where we are in India. We're not gonna make a statement about what if. As you know, first of all, we have a number of minority stakes throughout the world. And India is now one of these, but we've continued to evaluate all the time where we are. We also still have some smaller asset sale opportunity. They're smaller and which could be part of closing that element. And so we're the ideas which we have in mind, we're pretty confident that we can close that gap. Or, I mean, specify it very soon. But we feel right now with that pay down, as we then point out before, we will get going.

Okay. That's really helpful. And then on the promotional cadence, that you're seeing from competitors, it's encouraging to see sort of the improvement at the end of 4Q and into 1Q. Are you seeing like actual price announcements from competitors. Either on resale or wholesale retail or wholesale. Or do you think they've sort of just worked through that inventory? What's driving this improvement in the promotional cadence that's out there?

Yeah. So so, Rafe so first of all, our perspective, it's pure outside incumbent on competitors. We don't know what's going through ahead or whatever. So what we observe, just more from a dataset, is we have a fairly sophisticated price scraping tool where every week, we see we get thousands of in-car pricing for every competitor, every product, every SKU. We have a fairly sophisticated in-house tool, so we pretty much weekly observe everything which was going on the marketplace. So our comments in terms of promotion depth from what we see is based on this pricing scripting tool which would say is very accurate. And also my comments on recovery afterward are based on this price scripting tool. The actual mechanism which competitors use it's their decision. I would say, it's partially like we also do. Sometimes it's a like-for-like price change. Sometimes it's just a reduction of promotional depth. But we don't know ultimately what matter of price what consumer prices are basic in the card, and that's what we look at. But I would assume every competitor chooses slightly different tools.

Your next question comes from the line of W. Andrew Carter from Stifel. Your line is open.

I wanted to ask about the negative price mix variance in 4Q. And how it changed so much from kind of the 3Q guidance I wanted to ask is that, you know, number one, did all I think you said at one point that you didn't participate in promotion. But it's obviously a more promotional environment. Was there anything to this about clearing activity? I you had a lot of innovation. You also had a weaker, market. Therefore, the old analogs didn't move as quick. So anything you can help us on, you know, that big delta and kind of the speed at which it improves to 26.

So, Andrew, I think what has changed versus what we had in mind Q3 coming into Q4, we knew there's still some preloaded inventory of the markets. Obviously, because we don't have exact competitor data, I think what we may have underestimated how much first deal is out there. So we promotion MedBev will be an aggressive promotion environment. We anticipated it but it was deeper than we expected in all transparency. And now at the same time, and I made that comment in the script already, is the fact that the price is corrected pretty immediately after Black Friday I would read as an indication that this preloaded inventory is out of the system. Because if it would still be there, we would have seen Black Friday pricing continuing longer. So I think the big change is probably there was more inventory out there than we assumed. And right now, we assume that is normalized. And we're kind of that is behind us. And, again, what I said before, but last six weeks would indicate we're now in a more, what I would consider, normal competitive environment.

Thank you for that. And I think at one point, you mentioned you get sellout data on a weekly basis. We could obviously see the AHAM data guess it gets cut monthly but released quarterly. We could see how both how far below the discretionary units are relative to 19. Are you seeing a quicker reversion in sellout? And I guess where I'm going with this is, like, could there be a massive catch-up in discretionary unit shipments relative to nondiscretionary. They're higher mix. You know, if the turn has happened quicker, about what I'm asking. And I know just to be clear, your guidance is pretty much for 2026 more of the same on the discretionary nondiscretionary mix. Thanks.

Yeah. So so so, Andrew, I mean, first of all, to your question, we get sellout data, iCasel registered data for about 70% of our trade partners. So we have a pretty good sense about how we are doing from a sellout. And coupled with that, we typically also get comparable house sales. I e, we know how we're doing in the store in terms of picking up balance of sale or not. So we have a very good sense, and that is, of course, critical in particular when we're trying to assess the success of our new product launches. Lot of confidence you heard before comes exactly from looking at we sellout data on a weekly base. To your question about the discretionary demand, again, reemphasizing it's not baked in the guidance. Is there a certain chance? Yes. But you also we've been waiting for this uptick in discretionary demand for a long time, and that's why we're a little bit cautious at this point. What really and, again, it's the big driver will be ultimately consumer sentiment. The broader perception. Consumer sentiment, and we've seen that before, changes a lot faster than other indicators. And right now, it's low. And if you just take January, consumer sentiment is low by any definition. So reading that, you wouldn't have a lot of confidence. But, again, we have seen this coming around faster. And to your point, yes, that could unlock quite a bit of pent-up discretionary demand. But it's not factored in.

Your next question comes from the line of Eric Bosshard from Cleveland Research. Your line is open.

Good morning. Thank you.

Morning, Eric.

Question for Just two housekeeping questions for Roxanne. First of all, a lot of talk about the last six weeks on price mix. Has price mix been positive in this one and a half, 2% range over these six weeks? Is that what you've seen in your business?

Hi. Good morning, Eric. A couple of things to keep into consideration. One of the time periods where we saw the improvement is Black Friday. And so as you'd expect, during the Black Friday period, we are all paying out for the depth of the Black Friday holiday. So the majority of the benefit as it relates to price mix for the six weeks would really come in 2026. As Marc mentioned, from a Q1 perspective, though, keep in mind that there are other items that we will be doing, such as reducing production, which would therefore impact the Q1 results. And so we expect price mix to build up as we go throughout the year.

Eric, maybe and again, keep in mind, we largely pay our sales a trade partner on a sellout base. So there's a delay effect when you pay out pretty much a lot of these costs. What we look at as an early indicator, now we're getting two operations probably is also the gross ASVs, i.e., what is really the gross sales value which we have. And that is favorable the last six weeks. So that is an early indicator that we see the pricing coming through.

Okay. And then the second is, the assumption in '26 on outgrowing the flat market by two or three points. Similar question, Roxanne, is that what you're seeing now that your business is outgrowing the industry? By two or three points is that what's happening now, or is that a ramp in '26?

So so, Eric, I can comment on this one. That is almost entirely built on the success of a new product, and that is not just the last six weeks. As I mentioned before, ever since again, they didn't all launch at the same time. There was a big KitchenAid launch '3, but we have other products. And by the way, we continue to have new products also in '26. So we see from these new products on the flooring. Gains, and we also see the sellout gains. So that's pickup in volume is, I would say, almost entirely driven by what we see from the new products.

Your next question comes from the line of Sam Darkatsh from Raymond James. Your line is open.

Good morning, everyone. And Roxanne, JC, Ludo, again again, congratulations, and Roxanne in particular. I know you well. Very, very well deserved. And I think it made us all smile when we saw your the announcement.

Thank you.

Couple of quick questions. I know we've been dancing around the pricing question. Quite a bit this morning. The 1.75 guide for the year, what's the inherent assumption for industry like-for-like net pricing in order for you to achieve the one seven five?

So, Sam, again, we're not publishing what we assume as an industry pricing, and a lot depends on what competitors will do. Having said that, you saw earlier, and that's why we had this slide with the three components of pricing pitch, a better promotion environment, added new products, and mix overall. So, yes, there's a in the one seventy-five, there is a component about what we just think from a less promotional environment. Again, we to be honest, but assume it's roughly a third probably of that overall assumption or maybe half of a less promotional environment. But in all transparency, yes, we like what we saw over the last six weeks, but, of course, we're just cautious in terms of extrapolating the last six weeks for the full year. And I think right now, this assumption is kind of a little bit of middle ground.

So to paraphrase, if there is announced increase industry pricing from competitors that would be additive to your price guide theoretically? I've got a follow-up, but I just wanted to clarify that.

And then there's obviously a lot of ifs and whens and forward-looking statements, but let's if the price the promotion environment, which was seen in the last six weeks holds on a full year, we will like the outcome.

Okay. My follow-up question noticed that the RMI guide remains flat for '26. We recognize that steel is set but there have been moves of late in things like resins and base metals. Since the October call. I'm guessing the resins are getting offset by lower oil prices, so I think that's pretty understandable. But on the base metal side, can you help us as to how the hedges work from a timing standpoint as to when that might flow through or if you are exposed to higher copper, aluminum, nickel, zinc, that kind of stuff in '26 potentially?

Sam, you know our business very well, and you pretty much already gave the answer. So steel, because we have multiyear contract, is flat. In our assumption. There's still a couple moving pieces. On resins, it's directionally a good guy versus our assumption, but as you point out, aluminum, copper, in particular, a little bit of net a bad guy. A little bit buffered because, as you know, we go out with edges. With certain hedging corridors. And that's why we're saying right now the sum of it all is we basically assume a flat or not a major surprise. And, again, it's a wash of ins and outs. But we feel pretty comfortable about that RMI assumption.

Your next question comes from the line of Susan Maklari from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning, everyone. This is Charles Perron in for Susan. Thanks for taking my question. First, I just wanna

Good morning.

First, I just wanna go back on the cost action, the 150 plus tailwind for 2026. Can you talk about some of the what is the new actions, that are gonna be implemented this year versus the carryover impact from 2025 action. Can you elaborate on some of these measures put in place in terms of automation, strategic sourcing, and footprint of rationalization? And what factors are you considering before determining whether additional action would be necessary?

Yeah. So, Charles, it's Marc. First of all, there is some carryover, but, frankly, it's not that much. It's obvious overall. It's $150 million plus. It's probably less than a third is carryover. And that largely comes from the actions which we initiated about the cost they got last year, but just carried through, and there's the additional actions. The vertical integration is actually a new angle which we're pursuing. We've made good experience with vertically integrating some components actually in our Mexico factories. And we will aggressively go after that also in North America, where we expect quite a sizable saving on the respective components and frankly, also just more stability in our supply chain. That's one element. Automation is an ongoing effort and will accelerate. That will also drive benefits. What we refer to as a strategic sourcing initiative. It's a fairly elaborate and sophisticated process which we don't do every year because it's way too complex. The last time we've done that six years ago, and we got a lot of savings out of this one. It basically goes down to you take a book, take apart every single component. You weigh it. You do a global complete clean sheet assessment, what should cost be, we're putting it out for bidding across the world. It's just a very elaborate thorough process. And, again, just for complexity, you can't do whatever you're but given that it's six years ago, I think it's right. And we know we know the tool. We've done it before, and we expect, probably in the overall context, almost a third of cost savings coming out of this one.

Got it. That's super helpful color, Marc. And then second, I just wanna ask on the continued progress here seeing in small domestic appliances. It's good to see the 10% sales growth this quarter. When considering the business, how do you balance the growth momentum that you're seeing here versus holding to your 16% EBIT margin as you to maximize your returns over time?

Yeah. Charles, this is Ludo. So I'll take this one. So as you said, we're very happy with the performance of the SDA business. We grew at 10% in Q3 and again in Q4, and we have similar projections for 2026 going forward. A margin standpoint, what we believe is most of the highest value we can create, frankly, is through growth given the level of accretiveness we have on the margins already. So we're very focused on delivering that growth, and we're effectively reinvesting the margin that we create in excess of this 15 to 16% margin range into further acceleration.

And your final questions come from the line of Jeffrey Stevenson from Loop Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Hi. Thanks for taking my questions today. You reported healthy share gains in the third quarter from your new product introductions, which offset your first half share losses. But I was wondering if you could comment on your fourth quarter share gains and whether heavier competitor discounting and a soft underlying R and R demand environment prevented similar levels of share gains during the quarter?

So, Jeffrey, based on what we report in Q3, we picked up quite a bit of share with the new product, and that off what we lost in the entire first half. In Q4, the positive momentum when new products continued, so we continue to gain share with the new product. But, of course, by definition, the overall promotional period in Q4 is just a bigger portion of a quarter than in our prior quarter. During the promotional period, and that's what I indicated before, we did not pick up share. We just decided to hold our ground, and that's what we've done. So you have continued gains of share with a new product, in the promotion period, we didn't pick up a lot more. So overall, it ended with a full year, but we have a small market share gain for the entire year in North America. And almost entirely driven by the back half. Almost entirely driven by new products.

Understood. Thank you. Then I wanted to go back to, you know, comments earlier on a replacement demand. And this was tracking to roughly two-thirds of North America MDA sales last year, which is well above normalized levels. And just so I'm clear and your guidance are you not expecting, you know, any moderation in the percentage of replacement demand in 2026 unless we see some improvement in existing housing turnover or And then over the midterm, do you believe the percentage of replacements sales could move closer to, you know, 50% once the industry returns to a more normalized repair and remodel demand environment.

So, Jeffrey, there's two components. The absolute number of replacement volume we get, we expect to stay stable. And we've seen that pretty stable now for an extended time period. And then, again, it just comes with simple math. It's installed base, and we know that. And the overall usage in terms of here has come down a little bit because people are more using it more intensively. MET has now been stable for, I would say, two, almost three years on a pure replacement side. So the volume will stay the same. But, of course, then by definition, if it finally the discretionary demand picks up, the percentage of a total market replacement, will come down. Right now, it's well above 60%. And in I would even wouldn't even call it peak cycle. I would call it early or mid-cycle, discretionary cycle easily cover 50%. Not easy, but we had years where it would the discretionary side was up to 60%. So it's so the percentage is all driven by how much we would see on the discretionary demand going forward. So with that, I think that was the last question I'm which sorry. We went a little bit overtime today, but there's new faces, new voices, and then I think a lot of good questions. Again, as you heard before from us, you know, 2025 is behind us. It's in real video. We right now look just forward '26. There are some encouraging signs already happening now in '26, and I think we laid out the catalyst why we believe we are confident and it's in our execution control to deliver on them. And gives us the confidence behind '26. So thanks for joining me today, and looking forward to talking to you again next quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.