Good afternoon. And welcome to the Werner Enterprises Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. All lines are in a listen-only mode until after the presentation. [Operator Instructions] After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Chris Neil, Senior Vice President of Pricing and Strategic Planning. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, everyone. Earlier today, we issued our earnings release with our third quarter results. The release and a supplemental presentation are available in the Investor section of our website at werner.com. Today’s webcast is being recorded and will be available for replay later today. Please see the disclosure statement on Slide 2 of the presentation, as well as the disclaimers in our earnings release related to forward-looking statements. Today’s remarks contain forward-looking statements that may involve risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially. The company reports results using non-GAAP measures, which we believe provides additional information for investors to help facilitate the comparison of past and present performance. A reconciliation of the most directly comparable GAAP measures is included in the tables attached to the earnings release and in the appendix of the slide presentation. On today’s call with me are Derek Leathers, Chairman and CEO; and Chris Wikoff, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and CFO. I’ll now turn the call over to Derek.

Thank you, Chris, and good afternoon, everyone. We appreciate you joining us today. Before we begin, our thoughts and prayers are with those impacted by the recent natural disasters in the Southeast. Hurricane Helen and Milton have brought devastation to the region and we wish all those affected by these events a swift recovery. Many of our colleagues and customers have been directly impacted and I want to thank our team members for providing support to those in need. Moving to our results for the third quarter, we continue to see positive signs that we believe point to the early stages of an improving operating environment. West Coast Imports have been strong, we’ve secured some contractual rate increases and excess capacity continues to exit, albeit at a slow pace. However, the backdrop for the third quarter remains challenging. These positive signs were more than offset by several factors, including elevated health insurance claims, higher interest expense, pressure on Logistics gross margin and higher costs in the school network. As a result of these factors, our operating income and EPS declined slightly from second quarter to third quarter. The combined impact from elevated health care claims and driver school costs negatively impacted EPS by over $0.05 per share compared to Q2. Core sequential operational improvement would have been realized in our results if not for these headwinds. While the quarter remains challenging, underlying data points reflect a market in transition. This is resulting in cross-currents for Werner. The improvements we have been making to our business to drive long-term growth and value creation are being primarily offset by a challenging macro environment. While this is painful, it is also temporary. We remain disciplined on executing our strategy and are continuing to improve the business for today and for the future. As…

Thank you, Derek. Let’s continue on Slide 9. Third quarter revenues totaled $746 million, 9% lower versus prior year. Adjusted operating income was $21.6 million and adjusted operating margin was 2.9%, a decrease of 48% and 220 basis points, respectively. Adjusted EPS of $0.15 declined $0.27, primarily driven by a softer used equipment market, lower gains and higher interest expense combined with rate pressure in One-Way and Logistics. Turning to Slide 10. Truckload Transportation Services total revenue for the third quarter was $523 million, down 9%. Revenues net of fuel surcharges declined 6% to $460 million. TTS adjusted operating income was $24.5 million, 41% lower versus prior year. Adjusted operating margin net of fuel was 5.3%, a decrease of 320 basis points year-over-year, but a 30-basis-point improvement from second quarter. Lower equipment gains drove over 40% of the TTS decline in operating income. During the quarter, consolidated gains on sale of property and equipment totaled $2.6 million, a decline of $6.5 million or down over 71% compared to last year. Net of fuel surcharges and equipment gains, TTS operating expenses reflected our intentional commitment to control costs, declining modestly year-over-year and sequentially, but were more than offset by a 10% smaller average fleet size and a revenue per mile decline of 1%. Year-over-year One-Way revenue per total mile increased 0.3% in the third quarter and was down 1.2% year-to-date. Several TTS expense categories showed improvement in the quarter. Insurance and claims expense dropped $3 million or 10% versus prior year. Operating supplies and maintenance and general supply expense was down $1 million or 2%. We remain focused on producing higher operating margins and over time, returning to our long-term TTS operating margin target range. The building blocks to bridge the gap remain clear. They include first, rate improvement in One-Way.…

Thank you, Chris. We continue to make progress on our near-term initiatives, structural improvements and strategic tech investments on our path to position one or for growth as demand returns. The operating environment remains challenging, and while we were optimistic that the turn would occur before peak season, we are staying the course and focused on controlling what we can. We are pleased that One-Way trucking revenue per total mile increased in Q3. One-Way miles per truck showed continued year-over-year improvement and the Dedicated fleet grew sequentially. As a result of the intentional evolution in our business, Werner has never been stronger. We are a more diversified company and better positioned to capitalize on a market turn. We are a cycle-tested team and our historical results demonstrate our ability to generate earnings power as the market improves and demand accelerates. Through it all, we will remain steadfast in our approach to safety and delivering best-in-class service to our customers. With that, let us open it up for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question today is from Ravi Shanker with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks. Good afternoon, everyone. Can you just elaborate a little bit more on the health insurance claims and the kind of cost headwinds that you mentioned in the quarter? Just how many of these are one-time issues versus something that may sustain?

Hey, Ravi. This is Chris. Sure. We can unpack that a little bit. Not a ton of specifics that we can really provide around it other than it was uniquely elevated during the quarter, potentially even a record for us. So that’s just why we called it out in the results. Certainly something that can be volatile from time-to-time, but this was more of an outsized level for us. So it was about $0.05 of EPS impact, at least on a quarter-over-quarter basis, as we noted.

Understood. That’s helpful. And maybe as a follow-up, you also said in your prepared remarks that you secured some rate increases this quarter. Can you just talk about the magnitude of what you’re looking at for 2025 bid season, maybe starting now through going into the peak of it and 1Q, 2Q up next year?

Yeah. Ravi, this is Derek. So the rate increases that we’ve been achieving as we went through Q3 and into Q4, obviously we’re addressing sort of the most duress freight in our network first. So those numbers tend to be a little bit outsized, because that freight is freight that really needs to, at this point, either be repriced or replaced, and so there’s a level of assertiveness that goes along with that ask based on the current state of pricing with certain customers in the network. I think it’s too early to try to predict what 2025 looks like. I think the next several weeks will really shape and tell us a lot about what to expect going into the formal bid season. What I can tell you is that the slow build that’s been occurring in Q3 with some add-on in Q4 has been obviously somewhat impacted by the very natural disasters we opened up the call talking about and the port strikes as well. But even in addition to that, there is an ongoing kind of subtle tightening taking place. So I don’t want to call our shot just yet because I’d like to understand just how much tighter it gets as we go through this peak season. But it is our expectation as we look into 2025 that the time for rates to be going up is upon us. The question is the magnitude and I think it’s too early to tell.

Understood. Thanks, Derek.

Thank you.

The next question is from Scott Group with Wolfe Research. Please go ahead.

Hey. Thanks. Good afternoon. I think the last couple quarters you’ve talked about modest sequential margin improvement, which is how it’s played out. I don’t know. Derek, any thoughts there on how to think about the margins Q3 to Q4? And then can you just clarify, I thought I heard that Dedicated fleet might be lower in Q4, but the One-Way fleet higher. That feels like a change from last couple quarters of trends. I just want to make sure I heard that right.

Yeah. I’ll start with the latter part of that question, Scott, which is relative to Dedicated. So I think the issue in Dedicated right now as we look at Q4 is we know and have decided on a couple of final exits where we are -- we don’t believe the profile fits our long-term pricing discipline or our long-term alignment relative to a couple of customers and what their expectations are. As a result of that, but at the same time, add-backs starting to happen within Dedicated, it’s very difficult to relate or to predict exactly where that fleet lands, because what happens is we’re starting the early signs, and this is what you always see in the early signs of a turn, to start seeing individual Dedicated fleets adding capacity back, adding trucks back in, and they may or may not offset a couple of known exits that we’ve decided upon. So that’s the white noise perhaps you’re picking up in trying to understand what’s happening there. As it relates to One-Way, it has more to do with two things. One, proper retention of some of those quality drivers in the short-term, because our pipeline in Dedicated remains robust and so there are temporary placements where you want to protect and preserve the relationship with some very high-quality drivers we have in those fleets. And then secondly, but equally important, is as we go into peak and conversations we’re having with customers, it’s about right-sizing the fleet on a very temporary basis to be able to serve our customers and really participate in kind of that opportunity to both serve, but also at more of a premium rate environment over the standard contract language where we’re needed. So we’re optimistic about that. It’s not a change in strategy, and…

That’s helpful. And just lastly, I haven’t really heard anyone talk about the November 18th deadline with the Clearinghouse [ph], so maybe it’s not a big deal. But just wondering your take, Derek, if you think this matters from a capacity standpoint for the industry going forward.

I think it certainly could. It depends on how that implementation, if that implementation happens. And I think, Scott, what you’re probably hearing in terms of quietness out of the conversations with fleets is a lack of confidence in where that lands, how that lands and the significance of any enforcement/implementation. I would put it in the same category, for instance, as some tightening of visa requirements that are taking place right now relative to the southern border that we’re very encouraged by, but I’ll believe it when I see it. And so if you go from sort of these six-month visa enhancements that drivers can get and then operate under a B-1 program and you reduce that to potentially as short as a 10-day visa, it really puts some tightening on capacity because now they really have to do what the law says they should have been doing all along, which is to go into the country, deliver a load, and then exit. That’s not what we know is happening in practice. So there’s a couple of potential capacity catalysts or constraining catalysts, I should say, that we’re pretty excited about. But, look, it’s been a rough couple of years and so we’re not going to bank on that. We’re going to keep our head down, focusing on what we can improve internally, but certainly be excited if we see those things come through.

Thank you, guys. Appreciate the time.

The next question is from…

Thank you.

… Brian Ossenbeck with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. Maybe, Derek, just to follow up on your last comment there about maybe engineering the One-Way fleet down a little bit more, just to obviously the fourth quarter you mentioned is going up, but do you feel like you’re at a point where you don’t need to make any more of those adjustments to kind of drive further utilization or is it still maybe a little bit more to go as you continue to shift the mix more towards Dedicated over time as you have been?

Yeah. I mean, we’ve said on prior calls, and I still feel this way, Dedicated as a percent of total fleet will rise further from where it’s at today, most likely. We have other alternatives in the One-Way marketplace to provide our customers both with pure Brokerage, as well as Power Only. I think what they’re more interested in is the visibility, the suite of services, the portfolio that we bring to the table. But if they can -- if we can create efficiencies at their dock with a unified trailer pool, provide seamless service and visibility to them along the way, that product continues to gain traction and that’s why it’s one of the fastest growing products in our fleet. So as it relates to utilization, I want to be clear, like these utilization miles per truck increase isn’t driven by us shrinking the fleet, although obviously a smaller fleet forces more demand through it. It really is the result of ongoing engineering and efforts with some of the tech investments we’ve made to be able to put trucks in the right position to maximize their miles, which both is good for the driver, it’s great for the customer, because on those lanes where we do operate with our own equipment, we can further enhance both service safety and along the way overall productivity. So that’s exciting stuff. It’s also a reflection of leaning into Mexico cross-border. It’s a reflection of leaning into harder to serve markets where time sensitivity at -- is paramount. All of those things together we -- is why we believe that’s a sustainable system change that’s taking place here that we can hold on to and will mean a heck of a lot more from an operating leverage perspective as rates improve and those additional miles are not so close to, are not such small margin miles. So that’s what gives us the excitement and we talk about a stronger foundation going into a market turn. It’s those things, those operational structural improvements that have been very difficult and don’t pay great dividends in a market rate structure like the one we’re in today, but pay off in a significant more, a larger contribution rate as rates improve.

Okay. And then thanks for that. Just another follow-up maybe on Logistics. Can you give a little bit more color in terms of what the levers of profitability you think might be out there? You mentioned a few of them, account reduction, cost controls, revenue, quality. But I would assume some of that improvement on the profitability side looking to get to would probably just take more of a stronger, less competitive market. But I don’t know how much of that you feel you can get to your goal from more of those self-help levers or what really needs a stronger market to get you back to that or get you to the single-digit target? Thank you.

Yeah, Brian. This is Chris. Maybe a couple of things there. I mean, number one, I think the fundamentals in Logistics continue to be strong. We’ve got high customer retention there, serving large enterprise customers and there’s a number of things on the horizon, near-term and long-term, that we’re optimistic about within Logistics, including how we’re leveraging the technology there to improve not only how we’re going about serving large enterprise customers, but also the ability to gain more share with small and medium-sized customers within Brokerage. So that’s just overall we’re happy with the segment. It continues to be a competitive space, challenging, particularly within Brokerage. But there’s continued strength in Power Only within the Truckload Logistics that is continuing to grow double digits and a lot of positive aspects for that. That’s becoming just a greater mix of the Truckload Logistics. It’s growing domestic and cross-border. And again, we’re utilizing technology there to capture more overflow from assets into the Power Only business. So, I think that’s positive as we go forward. And then there are certain actions. We’ve been taking actions on the cost side. Overall, year-to-date, year-of-year, the SG&A expense within that segment are down 9%, specifically around the personnel cost. Those are down 10% year-of-year. But we’re obviously focused on staying positive in operating income and gradually expanding the OI margin there. So we’re taking additional actions in terms of, getting further or more lean in the operations, as well as other aspects and improvements in Final Mile and some other actions that we’re taking. So a lot there, but we’re focused on it. And long-term, we feel good about it, but also focused on what we can control in the short-term.

Yeah. One of the things I would just add is our tech journey has been most pronounced in the Logistics space and that’s where we’re the furthest along. Everything but Final Mile is now what we’re designing on our EDGE TMS platform. We’re seeing seat-level productivity that gives us strong confidence that there is a lot of cap space, if you will, at a seat level to be able to grow revenues and grow margin over time through higher seat-level contribution rates and so we’re excited about that. We need the volume to come along with it and we needed to make sure we didn’t overcut or build a bridge too far when we feel as though we’re as close as we are to a stronger market. So when all that comes together, that’s something that gives us a lot of encouragement looking forward.

Okay. Thanks very much, guys.

Thank you.

The next question is from Jeff Kauffman with Vertical Research Partners. Please go ahead.

Thank you very much. I wanted to focus a little bit more on pivoting for growth and longer term. I guess two parts to this. Number one, the driver market and not just getting drivers but quality drivers. How long will it take you to pivot to growth if, let’s say, you start to see the things you want to see in first quarter, second quarter next year? And then separate from that, fleet planning with all of the new CARB regulations and the 2027 EPA out there. How do you feel about managing fleet age and your ability to navigate growth over, say, the next 18 months to 24 months?

Yeah. Great question. So let’s start with the driver side. First off, this is where our school network and our vertically integrated approach to developing high-quality drivers is a true asset. It’s one of the toughest areas over the last couple of quarters because financially it obviously underperforms in an area. At a time, if you’re shrinking your fleet or even holding your fleet stagnant, that creates a cost overhang that’s real and tough decisions have to be made. It’s my belief that to curtail that capability for short-term gain would have been a major strategic error. We feel very good about our ability in a stronger market. If we’re in a position where we need to grow specifically Dedicated and add to those fleets and do so in short order, not only do we get the benefit of having a larger fleet and under long-term contracts and a higher margin profile, but we also improve and get some self-help on the school side through greater throughput. That network is built to produce a larger driver count than what it’s being asked to produce today, both for Werner and the industry. The demand for those high-quality drivers’ increases kind of right alongside overall market demand. The folks going through those schools both perform better financially because less bad debt, less other negative issues that go along with a market that maybe isn’t as robust from a hiring perspective. Because remember, roughly half those graduates end up at Werner, but about half of them end up in industry placements in general, not all driving trucks, by the way, but whether that be buses or other activities. And across the Board, that demand has been off. And so, we feel really good about our ability to respond from the driver side. As…

And Jeff, I would just add one more comment to that relative back to your first question around the schools and the drivers. During this down cycle, we have increased our school network in those locations by, call it, about 50%. We’ve added several locations over the last couple of years, which might sound counterintuitive in the down cycle to be investing in that area. But it does take a couple of years to create awareness of those schools being in certain geographies. So we’ve taken some of the investment and pain in doing that despite a down cycle. And so we’re even more positioned now for this up cycle with 50% more schools in key geographies than we have been in the past.

Thank you very much.

Thank you.

The next question is from Jason Seidl with TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Operator. Hey, Derek. Hey, Chris. Hope you guys are doing well. Two quick things. You talked about getting some sequential rate increases, I think, here on the contractual side. How should we think about the upcoming bid season? And what do you think you guys need to get to make sure that you can secure some earnings growth for 2025? And then my second question revolves around that $50 million target on the savings side. You say you guys are well on the way. You said the overwhelming majority is more what you would consider permanent savings. I was wondering if you can maybe drill down a little bit on that and just tell us how much is permanent out of that $50 million?

Yeah. Jason, thanks for the question. We are -- as I mentioned earlier on the call, it’s too early for us to predict where the rate environment is ultimately going to land as we get more firmly into the bid season. What I can tell you is that we are -- our early returns have been positive. You can see that in the fact that we had our first year-over-year improvement in rate per mile in the One-Way division in, I think, seven quarters. We believe we can build upon that momentum as we go into Q4, we believe that sets the stage and we’ve seen through recent events that we’re closer to tightness than we’ve been in a long time, those events being both the port strikes, as well as the hurricanes and even some of the pull forward on the West Coast that may have happened. In all cases, it’s driven kind of a sudden, immediate, and relatively steep reaction in the spot market. We’ve seen across our network, our spot pricing now roughly equate to equal to contract and in certain geographies now exceed contract for the first time in a long time. And so all of that are indications of where we’re at in the cycle. As we go into this bid season, there’s a clear-cut cost need. So, like, as it relates to cost-justifying increases, that’s pretty apparent and easy to do across the industry relative to how difficult this period has been. Then there’s the market drivers of where rate ultimately will land. I think if you look at the last couple of up cycles, we’ve performed head-to-head with the sort of best performers as it relates to rate. It’s our expectation we’ll do the same again. It’s just too early to give you an exact number.

Understood. On the cost side.

Yeah. Hey, Jason. So, again, just recapping, it’s almost $100 million over the last two-year period from these cost saving programs. I think you specifically were just asking about the extent that they’re permanent. We’ve said that well over 60% of these are structural and sustainable. And I think as we go forward, there will continue to be a high degree of savings that we’re realizing and executing on that just by their nature are structural and lasting over time. The way that we approach these is really focusing around operational innovation, leveraging technology, as well as M&A integration. So just by the nature of our process, how we go about seeking those opportunities and executing on them, how we identify and prioritize those opportunities, they’re just naturally areas that come from change that is lasting and permanent. That’s not to say all of them are that way, but for sure the vast majority are.

Okay. Fair enough. Appreciate the time, gentlemen.

Thank you.

The next question is from Daniel Imbro with Stephens. Please go ahead.

Hey. Good evening, guys. I want to step back a bit on the demand backdrop. I think others’ discerning season has sounded more mixed on peak season expectations. But in the prepared remarks, you mentioned seeing price opportunities and some underlying improvements. So, Derek, try to square that away and square away kind of what you’re seeing in the business that gives you confidence into a more normal peak season. Is that what you’re hearing from your customers or kind of what you’re seeing in the markets? Any more color on why you sound more bullish on the fourth quarter?

Yeah. I don’t know that I’m wanted the read-through to be that I’m bullish on the fourth quarter, but as it relates to peak. Well, I can’t speak to where others are coming from. I don’t know what their dialogues with their customer base is. What I know is in our customer base, we believe we’re going to have both a price and volume incremental lift this peak season compared to last. Both of those things are positive. When you can put them together, they’re a little more positive. So, that’s exciting. But we also know, obviously, that there’s ongoing macro headwinds and peak is only a small part of the overall organization as we think about fourth quarter. And so, it’s a mixed bag, right? But, yes, in terms of what’s the source of my statements, the source is our customers. It’s our ongoing relationships that we’ve built over many, many years. It’s their confidence and our ability to actually serve that peak and do what we say we’re going to do. And it’s our ability to ask for their support and gain it as it relates to the projects that we’ve signed up for and will be performing and already have begun in some cases to perform. So, you put all that together, that’s what gives us the confidence to make the statements I’m making today. But I’d be remiss if I don’t remind everybody that no matter how good peak is, it is still a subset of the overall total network of Werner Enterprises. And so, I’m not saying that it’s going to be some up-and-to-the-right major shift from Q3 to Q4, but it does set us up for sort of that moderate sequential improvement as we go forward.

That’s helpful. And maybe on the cash flow side, I think you mentioned about a positive buyback this quarter. But following up on an earlier question, you invested a lot in the down cycle, driver schools, reinvesting in the fleet. I guess into 2025, Chris, how would you expect CapEx to trend versus this year? Could that actually moderate and still support growth or is there further investment needed if we did see a market begin to recover and then how would share buybacks fit into the algorithm?

Yeah, Daniel, first on the CapEx side, we certainly have the optionality and capability to invest in growth and that is how we, first and foremost, prioritize capital allocation is reinvesting the business. So, where there’s a need to do that, investing in growth, investing in finding our self in a turn and an up cycle and needing to do that, we can certainly pull that lever and do that. I mean, it’s too early to say specifically on what we expect the net CapEx to be for 2025, but certainly we’ll invest in growth at the appropriate time. By and large, as a percent of revenue, our net CapEx has been trending down and we think that that certainly makes sense just as our portfolio continues to evolve to be more asset light. From a share repurchase perspective, we’re pleased with the long-term value that we created with the $67 million that we repurchased through the first half of the year. That’s modestly creative right now. Obviously, we’ll be more creative as earnings improve. And we have headroom in our Board approved program to lean back into that when it’s opportunistic. But we continue to evaluate all of the options in terms of deploying capital across a variety of criteria, how it impacts earnings, how it contributes to our long-term strategy and all of that in the context of our leverage profile. So we look at share repurchase, we look at M&A, where we’ve been active in looking at opportunities and we’ll continue to be balanced in that approach as we go forward.

Thanks so much.

The next question is from Eric Morgan with Barclays. Please go ahead.

Hey. Good evening. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to ask about the long-term margin range and PTS [ph]. It sounds like you’re still pretty confident getting back there and appreciate you outlining the drivers earlier. Just wondering if you could offer some high level thoughts. If we sort of see an average up cycle from here, something akin to pre-pandemic, do you think you can get back in that range within a single cycle or do you think just given where your margins are running today that it could maybe take a little bit longer?

Yeah. I think we’re certainly not able to commit that it could be done in a single calendar year, but a single cycle whereby we see lots of drivers, why this up cycle would certainly be a multiyear event. Those drivers being some of the regulatory environments, some of the emission changes, some of the higher cost of capital, thus a little bit higher buried entry for the first time in a long time with some of the new engines and emission changes, the ongoing onslaught of sort of nuclear verdicts and the risk profile of entering this business from the outside. There’s lots of different things that make the potential for this up cycle to be a multiyear cycle. We’re going to work our tails off to get there as quickly as we can and I think the timing and pace is it’s just too early in this cycle to predict. But that’s why we’ve sort of outlined the pillars of that, both in some of the opening presentation, as well as in some of Chris’ answers. Happy to elaborate on any of those if needed. But it’s just a bit premature for us to give great granularity to the arrival point in that range.

But, Eric, I would just reinforce again, I mean, we’re seeing progress. As we go forward just as a market, the progress is going to be gradual. But we’re seeing progress in all of those areas and that’s why we have confidence as we kind of dimension each of those building blocks out, that it gets us back to that long-term range and we’re holding on to that long-term range. I mean, we’ve seen improvement, as we’ve talked already here on the One-Way side, which is probably the largest contributor of those four building blocks. So we’ve -- whether you look at spots, supply chain disruption, lift, some of these early contract increases that we’ve talked about and then just what’s coming from peak season. I mean, all that contributes to rate improvement from a One-Way standpoint. So there’s progress there. There’s progress on the cost savings. It’s really on normalization in that Dedicated demand and normalization in the resale market that have a bit more progress for us to start to see overall progress across all four of those pillars. But I think at the beginning.

Yeah. Appreciate that. And just a quick follow up on the guidance and Dedicated, you still have the zero percent to 3% revenue protractor for the full year. Anyway, you can put a finer point on that, just given how far along we are in the year. Maybe just put some takes that might take it up or down from here?

I think the biggest reason that it’s hard to put a finer point on it is that we’re in conversations and actually have started to add back into Dedicated fleets. Some of those trucks that have exited during the downturn. So we’ve talked for several quarters about fleets that are off three to five, five to eight trucks, and it’s really the pace and placement of where they add back in that will determine some of that. There are certain Dedicated fleets that obviously operate at a much higher revenue per truck per week profile, because they have higher utilization rates and others that are equally profitable, but have a much lower utilization rate, therefore, a lower revenue per truck per week. All of that goes into the soup and so it’s difficult until we have greater clarity on exactly the pace and placement of those trucks to give any finer point than that. Again, I think the takeaway is less about the percentage and more about the activity. And the activity at this point is positive that we’re starting to see some of those add backs. And unfortunately, in Q4, they’re countered by the reality that we have a couple of exits that we’ve decided to execute on relative to it not meeting our margin and long-term strategic profile that we’re looking for.

Understood. Appreciate it.

Thank you.

And the final question today will be from Chris Wetherbee with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Hey. Thanks. Thanks for taking the question. Yeah. I guess I wanted to come back to, Derek, your comments about the fourth quarter and I think you talked about it in the context of margins. Sometimes you talk about it in the context, I think, of earnings as well. I’m just kind of curious how to think about the progression to the fourth quarter. I guess, maybe specifically, is the $0.05 sort of these extraordinary cost items that you recognize in the quarter? Is that the base that we should be thinking about? I just want to make sure I’m understanding, like, kind of level set, how we should be expecting kind of the progression from 3Q to 4Q in a rough sense?

Yeah. I think on the $0.05, the concern I would have there is, I think, early in the call, somebody asked, is this a one-time event? Well, I’d love to be able to predict the future health of all of the associates at Werner. I can’t. What I can tell you is this was a very large anomaly in terms of the large number, a small number of very large claims that occurred during the quarter. Because of HIPAA laws and other things, it’s not like we have great clarity on what exactly those claims were and are they going to recur or not. It would be our belief that there certainly wouldn’t be a repeat at nearly the magnitude because that’s what history would tell us. But it is one of the areas of the business that unfortunately we operate a little bit more blind than we would like just out of privacy laws, HIPAA laws and other things where we’d simply like to be able to plan for it if it’s an ongoing treatment that’s going to extend it further into Q4. So I don’t think it’s as easy as just saying, yeah, the $0.05 will all come back and that was a one-and-done situation. But we do believe that a decent proportion of that would likely, based on history, not repeat itself. And then from there, it’s just the ongoing grind of all of these operational things we’ve been talking about continuing to take hold, as well as a potential for a little bit of lift across the normal Q3 to Q4 peak season. It’s not yet a robust peak season. I’m not here to say that. I’m just saying in years past, we’ve been through a couple of years where we either had more volume but much lower price or perhaps price held up okay, but there just wasn’t a lot of peak there to be had. This one is slightly up in volume, slightly up in price. So that has a good setup as we go from Q3 to Q4. But -- so, I mean, I guess that’s about as good a clarity as I can give you at this point. And on the health side, it’s just something that’s an ongoing battle to try to do everything we can to maintain a healthy workforce. But usually when you see these singular claims that are very large individual amounts, it isn’t related to ongoing health and wellness. It’s related to some sort of unique event that took place and had to be addressed in the U.S. medical system, which is not a place that’s got a low price for admission.

Yeah. That’s for sure and I appreciate that clarity. That’s helpful. And I guess just one other point on the Dedicated fleet. So I think your end of period count was above the average and I know it sounds like there’s some exits that you’re making. Do we think about that from the end of period for the third quarter or off of the average number on the Dedicated fleet for 4Q?

Yeah. Great question. I think you think about it from the end of period. I think the end of period number was actually kind of material up -- materially up from the average number, which is really indication of two basic things. One, the landing and implementation of some new business opportunities. Said differently, Dedicated is still open for business and we’re still landing new accounts. And two, the add backs that I’ve been referring to a few different times during the call where we’re now starting to see fleets kind of return to their normal size and shape, because even though these Dedicated contracts are Dedicated in nature and binding, they do have certain levels of flexibility to ebb and flow, and as that flow starts to ebb up versus down, you get a lot of natural lift, because we have over 160 Dedicated fleets out there, and so when 2s and 3s start adding back, it really can add up to real numbers pretty quickly. Again, those are offset in Q4 specifically by a couple of remaining exits that are still in front of us that have -- that will be happening. Those are known and it’s offset by how many more add backs, as well as some new business coming in into the quarter.

Yeah. And just to be specific…

Okay. Very helpful.

… the Dedicated -- the end of quarter Dedicated fleet from end of Q2 to end of Q3 was up 80 trucks, 1.6%. And you’re looking at it exactly right, it sounds like, I mean, there was a late in the quarter strong push, particularly with large enterprise customers, both expanding existing fleets as well as recognizing and implementing some new business. So that was a late push and realization late in the quarter.

Okay. That’s very helpful. I appreciate the call, guys. Thank you.

Yeah. Thank you, Chris.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I’ll now turn the call over to Mr. Derek Leathers, who will provide closing comments. Please go ahead, sir.

Yeah. Thanks, Gary. I want to thank everybody for being with us today. Despite the difficult industry environment, we’ve utilized this downturn to try to bolster Werner and invest for our future positioning. It’ll take time for it to fall to the bottomline, but the ongoing progress in production, revenue per truck, and now this quarter, early signs of rate inflection all lead us to better results over time. We remain focused on sustainable cost cutting, but will not starve our strategic investments and fleet readiness or our technology roadmap or our commitment to safety and service. We’ll continue to lean into our differentiators, that’s Dedicated Mexico cross-border and a stronger Logistics portfolio than we’ve had previously, all with an eye towards operating leverage as the market improves. I’ll close by thanking our over 13,000 associates for their dedication and commitment to our customers, and frankly, to each other throughout this difficult market. Werner is a structurally stronger company today with a lot to be excited about moving forward. Thanks for your continued interest and support.

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect.