Welcome to Walker & Dunlop’s Third Quarter 2015 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. Hosting the call today from Walker & Dunlop is Willy Walker, Chairman and CEO. He is joined by Steve Theobald, Chief Financial Officer and Claire Harvey, Vice President of Investor Relations. Today’s call is being recorded and will be available for replay beginning at 11:30 AM Eastern Standard Time. The dial in number for the replay is 800-839-2488. The archived call is also available via webcast on the company’s website. At this time all participants have been placed in a listen-only mode and the floor will be open for your questions following the presentation. [Operator Instructions] It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to Claire Harvey.

Thanks, Steve and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us on the Walker & Dunlop third quarter 2015 earnings conference call. For the first time ever we have taken our show on the road, Willy, Steve and I are reporting this morning from beautiful Southern California. We acquired Johnson Capital almost exactly one year ago so it’s fitting that we are reporting this quarter from Johnson Capital’s old offices that have added so much to our platform. The acquisition doubled our capital markets group and added significant brokered presence across the country. This quarter our brokered originations hitting all time high of $1.3 billion. And in the last 12 months we’ve originated $2.9 billion of loans in the State of California. Making it our largest state by origination volume. And as some of you who listened to the whole music on the conference bridge notice the Beach voice songs reinforce the theme of catching the commercial real estate financing wave and the goodbye aberration of our financial performance is sending out. And now on to the necessary legal disclosures. This call is being webcast live on our website and a recording will be available later this morning. Both our earnings press release and website provide details on accessing the archived call. This morning we posted our earnings release and slide presentation to the Investor Relations section of our website, www.walkerdunlop.com. These slides serve as a reference point for some of what Willy and Steve will touch on this morning. Please also note that we will reference the non-GAAP financial metrics adjusted EBITDA during the course of this call. Please refer to the earnings release and presentation posted to our website for reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income. Statements made on this call which are not historical facts may be deemed forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements, including statements regarding future financial operating results, involve risks, uncertainties, and contingencies, many of which are beyond the control of Walker & Dunlop and which may cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results. Walker & Dunlop is under no obligation to update or alter our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. We expressly disclaim any obligation to do so. More detailed information about risk factors can be found in our most recent Form 10-K and subsequent Form 10-Q reports on file with SEC. With that I will turn the call over to Willy.

Thank you, Claire and good morning, everyone. The commercial real estate finance market continued its substantial year-over-year growth again this quarter. 2015 is looking like it may close as the most active year in a decade in terms of debt financing volumes and investment sales activity. We have positioned Walker & Dunlop to have the scale and market position to capitalize on this cycle and for the fifth consecutive quarter we’re reporting year-over-year growth across our financial results. In three of the last four quarters, we have closed over $4 billion of transaction volume on the strength of our GSE originations, the dramatic growth of our capital markets business and the broaden Walker & Dunlop presence across the commercial real estate industry. This quarter we originated $4.1 billion of loans, and closed $825 million of investment sales volume for total transaction volume of $4.9 billion. Entering the third quarter we were anticipating a slowdown in GSE lending given Q2 market disruptions and a relatively weak yield pipeline. However in the middle of the quarter due to market volatility and Fannie Mae re-entering the market activity picked up significantly and we ended the quarter outperforming our initial expectations, particularly with Fannie Mae. As you can see on slide three, another strong quarter puts our market share of Fannie Mae’s total multifamily originations year-to-date at 11.3% and at 13.7% with Freddie Mac. We have now originated over $1 billion per quarter with each of GSEs for five consecutive quarters and the combined $2 billion of GSE originations per quarter has directly benefited our financial performance over that time. Year-to-date Fannie Mae has delivered $32 billion of loans, while Freddie Mac has delivered $34 billion. Our thinking continues to be that Fannie & Freddie will each finish the year between $40 billion and…

Thanks, Willy and good morning, everyone. As Willy mentioned Q3 is the latest in the string of quarters in which we have shown significant year-over-year growth in transaction volumes. This level of production has resulted in significant increases in profitability and outperformance in our key financial metrics, with diluted earnings per share this quarter of $0.66 up 40% from the $0.47 we reported last year. Return on equity annualized for the quarter at 18%, increased dramatically yet again up from 15% in last year’s third quarter predominantly due to a 34% increase in net income. Operating margin for the third quarter was 28%, up from 25% in Q3 ’14. The improvement in operating margin was driven by the benefits of scale that combined volumes are above $3 billion and from growth in revenue sources not directly tied to variable compensation. We continue to grow revenue at a rate faster than expenses, with 40% year-to-date growth in total revenue compared to a 29% increase in expenses. During the quarter Fannie and Freddie accounted for 63% of loan originations, with brokered volume at 32% resulting in a gain on sale margin of 172 basis points as shown on slide seven. 37% of our GSE volumes in the quarter were adjustable rate loans, remaining at level higher than our historical range of 15% to 20%. We continue to be pleased with gain on sale margin in the 160 to 180 basis point range. As they are a reflection of the mix that comes with the diversification of our lending activity, specifically the dramatic increases we have seen in our Freddie Mac and brokered production. We also view the elevated levels of adjustable rate financing as creating opportunities over the next few years to capture additional volumes as these loans are either refinanced where…

Thanks, Steve. Since going public in 2010 we have acquired companies to grow and diversify our lending operations. The year we went public we originated $457 million of brokered loans in our capital markets group. Since then due to exceptional organic growth, strategic hiring and one acquisition we have built a team that has originated $4.1 billion of loans over the past year, representing nearly 10X growth over five years. With non-bank commercial loan maturities expected to increase significantly in 2016, we are very optimistic about our capital markets business. We have expanded our lending operations as well by investing over $92 million of capital in interim loans on our balance sheet. With a total portfolio balance of $347 million at the end of Q3. This lending program has been broadly welcomed by our borrowers and provided strong bottom-line returns to our business. In addition to the dramatic growth in our capital markets and balance sheet lending businesses we launched our conduit with Fortress Investment Group last year. Although our conduit has not scaled as we had hoped to-date our CMBS partnership has established a strong brand in the marketplace for originating and securitizing excellent deals. We see tremendous opportunity for our conduit in 2016 as CMBS maturities are forecast by the Mortgage Bankers Association to grow 82% to $133 billion. We remain committed to our core and multifamily lending business. There is a significant amount of multifamily debt maturing between 2016 and 2020 and maturing loans will continue to operate as a catalyst for investment sales and refinancing decisions by our customers. Not surprisingly, as you can see on slide 13, there is a strong correlation between investment sales activity and loan origination volumes. Our entry into the multifamily investment sales business has gone exceptionally well and year-to-date that…

The floor is now opened for questions. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. Our first question is from Jade Rahmani from KBW.

Good morning, and thanks for taking the questions. Just wanted to get thoughts on recent volatility in rates in the CMBS market are you seeing any changes and how sponsors are looking at deals or is there any reason to be more cautious as you look to make additional loans?

Good morning, Jade and thanks for joining us. There’s no doubt that the choppiness in the market that really began in earnest in mid-August has made pricing deals and structuring deals quite challenging. I think the markets were for lack of a better term quite consistent for the first eight and half months of the year, but come mid-August when the market -- when particularly equity markets started to dislocate somewhat it created a lot of gapping out on spreads, even as you had a tightening on treasuries. All that has done is made our role as an advisor to our clients far more important and it is a true testament to the strength of our team that our Q3 results are what they are and that as we started Q4 and that choppiness has remained in the markets that our team has been working very closely with clients to get deals done. The final thing, specifically your point about CMBS clearly the CMBS market has been volatile and you’ve seen that in all of the tracking on the macro-numbers. I would only say that our conduit is gaining momentum given we’ve been in the market now for over a year and we have a great brand and we have a great team. So as I said in my prepared remarks we see a huge opportunity for our conduit in 2016 given the amount of CMBS financing that needs to be refinanced next year.

Thanks for that. In terms of the originations outlook, what kind of impact do you think large transactions that you may not win such as Lone Star or [indiscernible] could have on the market and specifically the GSEs capacity?

So I think the trend of large deals will continue into 2016. There has been a pretty significant disparity between the value that private buyers will pay for assets and the value that the public markets are putting REIT assets today. And as a result of that I think that we will see more private transactions and there is a tremendous amount of equity capital still trying to find its way into the commercial real estate space and multifamily as probably the strongest asset class during this cycle, I believe we’ll continue to attract the interest of both the private equity firms as well as foreign investors. The nice thing is that with our scale with both Fannie and Freddie, Walker & Dunlop is very much in the mix on almost every large transaction as you just said in your comments, we did not work on the Lone Star transaction nor are we working on the [indiscernible] transaction today, but I would put forth to you that on all of the big transactions going on we are in the mix and it’s our expectation that we will win our fair share of large deals as we move forward.

And then just on M&A, in the current environment your views on the cycle is M&A attractive and if so what areas of expansion do you think would complement WD’s existing platform?

So as you know Jade we’ve been very successful at acquiring companies, holding on to the talented human capital that we acquire through those acquisitions and successfully integrating those companies into Walker & Dunlop. And so I would be shocked if we don’t continue to focus on growth through acquisition. It’s a real core competency of our company and of our management team. And I think our results speak for themselves as it relates to the success we’ve had with the acquisitions we’ve done. With that said, we are not interested in making diluted acquisition. We have been very good at making accretive acquisitions and in doing so you need to find the proper opportunity where the combination of what the acquirer does today, the scale that Walker & Dunlop could provide to their operations is accretive for both partners. So we must have something they don’t have and they must have something that we don’t have or at least the combination provides something that either of us has today. And so we’ll continue to look and as I said previously I think we’ve had a fantastic run on that front and it’s become a real core competency of our company.

Thanks. I’ll get back in the queue.

Our next question is from Steve DeLaney from JMP Securities. Your line is open.

Thanks, good morning everyone. And Claire I just want to mention we’re having difficulty finding the slide deck on the website. So no problem we look for but I just want to mention that at least my team hasn’t been able to locate it. Willy thanks for addressing no one speak; I wanted to follow-up on that. So this new quarterly review concept what do you believe the practical impact of that quarterly view will be in terms of GSE behavior? Will they simply proceed that they can lend as much as they want to if the numbers get big that Mel Watt will simply adjust the cap.

So, good morning Steve. And for the first time when I say good morning to you on a conference call I know exactly how good that morning is as far as waking up at the crack of dawn to be on this call. So thanks for being on, on California time.

Yeah.

I think that that is a potential expectation and I think it’s probably false expectation. In the sense that from listening to Director, Watt speech as well as participating in a lunch right after that speech it is very clear that the FHFA does not want to have the same type of market dislocation or market seize up that we saw in Q2 of this year when the agencies had a very strong Q1 and looks like they were going to hit their caps and therefore had to go back into FHFA for review. So this will be a formal process that will make it so that that does not have to happen again. With that said I think both GSEs understand that the FHFA is very focused on market share and Fannie and Freddie’s market share. So let’s just take a look and think that in Q1, 2016, Fannie and Freddie said let’s just get back at it go hog wild. And all of a sudden you got to the end of Q1 and FHFA did their review and although Fannie and Freddie did a ton of production the market wasn’t as big as FHFA thought it was going to be. I do not expect FHFA at that time to if you will allow Fannie and Freddie to go beyond the existing caps if their market share surged beyond 50% of the market for instance. So I think at the end of the day this review should they go and have a very strong first quarter and all of a sudden the aggregate market size has grown dramatically to make it so that they are less than 50% of the market, then I think there is clearly the opportunity that FHFA would broaden out the caps. But I think that if they are north of 50% and just sort of said we’re going to go and gabble up the market that they would have absolutely no reaction other than potentially a real -- a negative reaction from FHFAs as far their volumes.

That’s helpful. And it sounds like you are suggesting that 50% is the magic level at which the GSEs may be required to put on the break, 50% market share that would be a level that Mel Wall would not want to breach.

I would put forth that that’s probably a level they would now want to breach. FHFA is very focused on 40%.

Okay, got it.

So they are talking 40%. I am giving you if will some color thinking that where they go over 50% I think it’s a pretty quick, we’re not giving you any relief. If they’re under 50% I think that there is clearly discussion, but where FHFA is targeting them to be is closer to 40%.

Got it, that’s very helpful. Thanks for that clarity. And switching over to the CMBS conduit activity nice to see that you did report $56 million of origination sales in the quarter, we were curious Willy, we did not see those loan sales reported by commercial mortgage alerts in their weekly reports of contributors and to new issues. Is there something -- but your first quarter and second quarter activity were picked up, was there anything different about the second quarter sales that -- can you comment on which deal you sold into or just curious why we didn’t see that into your press release?

Hey, Steve this is Steve. To clarify on that the $56 million represents what we originated to the Walker & Dunlop platform for the CMBS conduit during the quarter. The conduit actually did not participate in the securitization in Q3.

Got it.

We have one that were in the throes of wrapping up right now that will be in the fourth quarter result.

So those loans were on the conduits that loan or loans were on the conduit warehouse at 9/30?

Exactly right.

That helps us understand. And your revenue recognition does it occur when you deliver it to the conduit or when the new issue is actually executed?

Yeah. So, within the joint venture itself, we’re marking things to market so there is some reflection of the economics at the end of the quarter, but most of the securitization related revenue obviously will be recognized when the deal occurs.

Got it. Okay, that’s helpful. Thank you Steve. And Willy one last thing, obviously Engler good for first full quarter over $800 million, I don’t know whether that’s a run rate type of quarter, but it was certainly project out to $3 billion to $3.5 billion a year in IS volume. You had stated earlier that you expected to start stepping up recruiting early 2016 once hearing compensation hurdles or kind of compensation is reset for everyone. When we look out over the next couple of years, can you give us some sense of what your expectation would be for a growth rate in IS volume year-over-year? Are we looking at something that is a 10% grower or does it have the potential to be much greater than that? Thank you.

So, Steve first of all $825 million in there first quarter Walker & Dunlop I would say is a little better than good. And we view it is been quite honestly spectacular. The second thing is as it relates to recruiting; we have spent a lot of time focusing on expanding that team and that platform across the country. The success of that team in a very, very short period of time at Walker & Dunlop I think is reflective of the strength of our platform and that has if you will, involved into our recruiting efforts and helped us a tremendous amount. I think the third thing on the recruiting side of things is that if somebody comes to Walker & Dunlop on the investment sale side, we basically are giving them a blank sheet of paper to go build their business, whether in the Western United States or in the Southwest or in the Northwest and the Northeast for that matter, which is a real advantage to us versus some of the competition, which have fully built out investment sales platforms or elbows [ph] might be a little sharp if you will and where territories are very, very specifically defined. The final thing is that it relates to the growth rate, we have not given projections on how fast we’re going to grow that business. But I think I do believe it’s fair to look at the growth rate that we have built our capital markets business at. We set our mind to growing our capital markets businesses in 2012 put it out there as a stated objective and as you can see from the numbers we put up today on the growth of that business, we’ve been very successful at executing on that growth. Today, we don’t see anything out there that says that our investment sales business can’t grow in the similar fashion to our capital markets business, given our brand, given the deal flow that we see coming up in ‘16, ‘17 and ‘18 and quite honestly the platform we acquired to be the corner stone of our investment sales platform.

That’s helpful. I appreciate your point about having a lot of open territory, which gives you if you will could use the word franchise that you can grant to this talent does put you in the driver seat I think. So congratulations on another great quarter. Thanks for the color.

Thank you, Steve.

Steve on the slides I apologize for the confusion, they were posted under the Quarterly Results section of the website; they’re now under both quarterly results and webcast and presentation so you can find them in both places.

Great, thanks so much. Thanks very much.

Our next question is from Charles Nabhan from Wales Fargo. Your line is open.

Thanks and good morning. Staying with the investment sales business, could you comment -- could you provide us with the operating margin for that business from this quarter and comment on whether you see that as a normalized run-rate in light of the growth initiatives in place for the business?

Yeah Chuck this is Steve, I think you can kind a back into it we’ve given the revenue number, you can see in the income statement the amount of income that was attributable to non-controlling interest, which is 25% which is based on the amount that EFG team retained. So you can figure out what the operating margin is. It’s pretty strong right now, I think as we build out the platform and incur recruiting expenses and cost to get folks signed on to the platform. You should see that operating margin drift lower, but should remain at pretty good level.

Okay. And as a follow-up it looks like about 37% of loans were floating rate this quarter. Could you comment on what you’re seeing from a borrower behavior standpoint thus far in the fourth quarter and your expectations going into 2016?

Sure Chuck so Q1 and Q3 of 2015 were if you will, floating rate quarters where the percentage of our originations that were floaters got close up close to 50% of our loan origination volume up from sort of a historic average of around 25%. Q2 is back down at sort of the historic average of 25% floating and 75% fixed. I think the market has a rate increase of 25 basis points already built into it from an acquisition standpoint. And so I don’t think that there any buyers out there today who are not expecting a rate hike of 25 basis points either later this year or early in 2016. And as such I think that people are doing their math and saying we think the fed might raise and if the fed raises they’re not going to continue to raise. So we like the additional spread we can pick up by going floating versus fixed. And then the other major driver is that on a floating rate deal you’re locked up for the first year and then you got a 1% prepayment penalty for the rest of the loan versus on a fixed rate loan you’ve got yield maintenance for 9.5 years of a 10 year loan. That prepayment flexibility has driven many buyers who don’t plan to hold the assets for a longer than five or seven year period to go and opt for variable rate financing. So it has been a very robust variable rate market. Fortunately for Austin for the agencies Fannie and Freddie’s variable rate markets on variable rate products on the multifamily side are as good as or better than anybody else. And so it is a very competitive product and we’ve been selling a lot of it. You’re asking about 2016, I would put forth to you as I said previously most people have the 25 basis point rate increase already built into their numbers. And I would think that we continue to see a lot of variable rate into 2016 should there be a second or third rate increase by the fed. My tummy would tell me that people start to think that rates actually might materially move and start to look more towards fixed than float. But as long as we’re in this sort of potential rate increase might do it -- than do it but then sort of pause. I think borrowers will continue to look for variable rate financing.

Great, thank you guys.

Yeah.

Our next question is from Cheryl Pate from Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Hey, guys this is Jeff Pattison [ph] calling for Cheryl.

Good morning, Jeff.

Good morning. I was just wondering if you could elaborate a little bit more on the mix of variable versus fixed in the expense line I know you mentioned that the acquisitions added to the fixed comp little bit, but just wondering if you could put some color on that?

So you want to focus on variable versus fixed expenses?

Yeah. Just I mean it looks like you guys have some pretty good operating leverage on the comp side. So wondering if you could maybe elaborate whether there were some shift in the mix there some seasonality we should be thinking of?

No, Jeff I think really the... this is a reflection of the fact that we did $4.9 billion of transaction volume. I mean at that level obviously our overall compensation expenses going to increase based on the commission payouts. But at that level of origination volume our fixed expenses are going to come a much smaller percentage of our overall revenue base and that’s what we saw this year, this quarter. We did see an increase in amortization expense on the mortgage servicing rights, which is a reflection of the fact that we’ve grown the servicing portfolio pretty significantly. So all things being equal that level of amortization is going to continue to increase, but we also saw a slight pickup in prepayment activity, which generated on the expense side some additional write-offs of mortgage servicing rights, but as you saw on the revenue slide it also resulted in a pretty sizable increase in our prepayment fee income. So those kind of go hand-in-hand at this point.

Okay, that's helpful. And then just thinking about the servicing portfolio, is 25 bps something we should be expecting on a run rate basis now or does that maybe sit back down to the 24 over time?

Yeah, look I think it’s going to hover in the 24 to 25 basis point range depends on the mix of business that we are putting into the portfolio going forward. As I mentioned in my remarks we had some transfers out on the life company servicing side, which is at much lower rate than our portfolio average and that really helps push the average fee up to 25. If we book a lot more life company servicing in Q4 it could pull that number back down to 24, but it’s going to be in that range for some time.

Got it, that’s helpful. That’s all I had thank you.

Our next question is Jade Rahmani from KBW. Your line is open.

Hi, thanks for taking my follow-up. Can you give a sense on the brokered loan size about product mix maybe by property type or however you’d like to describe it?

Jade, we haven’t broken that out. But I would put forward to that there are couple of themes in there. First of all if you -- it is across all property types, so retail office, hospitality, retail being our second largest asset class followed by office and hospitality being if you will the fourth. The other thing I put forth is that in our brokered business we are seeing a lot of multifamily going off to life insurance companies and CMBS lenders and I think if that that is emblematic of the fact that W&D has such a strong reputation in the multifamily space that our brokers are having the opportunity with the strength of the GSEs as W&D’s reputation and size with them to be able to go to potential clients and say if you want the best agency execution give me the deal. But I’ll also take it out to the rest of the market and see what else is out there. And on a low leverage deal that likely might go to a life insurance company, on a higher leverage deal it might go to a CMBS lender and if it’s sort in the 75% loan Tier II it’s going to go to an agency and whether it’s Fannie and Freddie they are going to get best in class execution from W&D. So multi is by far the largest asset class of our brokered operations year-to-date. And as I said with retail in number two, office is number three and hospitality number four.

In terms of the -- just look at the balance sheet the mortgage loans held for sale line item increase sequentially significantly, is that a timing factor and did you see the GSEs extend sort of the time in which they would take to buy the loans from you?

Yeah Jade most of that impact is just a function of the increase in volume as it’s sitting on our warehouse waiting to be delivered to the investor. There is some portion of our loans available for sale with Freddie Mac for which we will be holding those loans beyond our typical period likely into 2016. As of the end of the third quarter that number was still relatively small. And you saw earlier in the quarter we put out a press release on a portfolio of loans that we had done that we arranged a separate warehouse line for that we’re holding until probably sometime in early 2016 as well. That was about $240 million portfolio. So there is some of that, but most of the surge in volume is just a function of the increase in origination activity.

So given that those loans you’re holding for longer, can you just give an update on current investment capacity and liquidity?

Sure so we’ve right now got about $2 billion of overall warehouse capacity. We still have room within that number based on where you saw the loans available for sale balance. We’ve also -- has discussions with our banks as they’ve done historically in the fourth quarter when we’ve had volume increases they’ve been very receptive to increase the net capacity and I know of no reason why that wouldn’t continue to be the case.

Okay. Just on the conduit margin side was the decline due to brokered loan mix or can you just give us some color on the brokered loan margins?

So on the conduit side; I am not exactly sure what margin number you’re pointing to on the brokered side, the brokerage business as you know Jade we don’t break out by execution of the various margins. But I would just put forth you if you look at the volume we’ve done in the broker business and the overall operating margin we have put up for several quarters now that is playing very nicely into our overall operating margin from a scale and from a return standpoint. And then as Steve mentioned in his comments, the 172 basis points gain on sale margin that we had in the quarter I think is emblematic of the diversification that we put into the business. Many investors have sat there and said well we love your gain on sale margin, but it’s all Fannie Mae business and if anything ever happened to Fanny Mae your gain on sale margin would drop dramatically. And so as we have gone and built up our relationship with Freddy Mac to being one of their very larger seller servicers as we’ve scaled our brokerage business and as we’ve added our investment sales business as well as our balance sheet lending and the conduit. Having the gain on sale margin be in that range that Steve put out there of 160 to 180 basis points is exactly where we like to see it, because it is emblematic of the diversification we put into our business. With all that said, the gain on the sale margin that we’re getting from our Fannie originations has been fantastic and remains very strong. And so it’s a very positive outlook from both of those standpoints from my perspective.

Great, thanks for taking my follow-ups.

Our next question is from Brandon Dobell from William Blair. Your line is open.

Thanks. Two, just first a quick one, just want to confirm how you guys are thinking about the personnel expenses to finished out the year and how we should think about the impact of Engler as we try and model the first part of next year too.

Yeah, so Brandon on the commission side, it’s typically as you can see from our historical numbers our commission expenses increased over the course of a fiscal year as folks get to the top-end of their splits. We’re expecting that same dynamic here with respect to the fourth quarter. So I wouldn’t be surprised if personnel expenses are a little bit higher in Q4 than they have been in the previous quarters. I think what we have seen is on a year-over-year comparison our personnel expenses have been running at a lower percentage of total revenue, but they have increased each quarter as we’ve gone through the year.

Okay.

And then when we roll the calendar to Q1 things start over commission schedules reset and we’ll start at the lower levels again come January 1. On the investment sales, obviously with us acquiring EFG in the second quarter in April there won’t be any first quarter comp revenue from investment sales. So as you in your model there if zero in 2015 and it will be whatever you model in 2016 and we’ll get half a month of that benefit in the second quarter and then at that point it’s fully comparable.

Got it, okay. And then Willy one is for you, first your maybe some perspective on I think you said 225 to 250 kind of the expectation for next year’s volumes, some perspective on the likelihood of that 250 being too low given the momentum the market has or do you think there were some special things this year given just to talk about rate increases and that kind of stuff that makes that 225 number the right place to start?

Brandon I’d put forth that 225 is the right place to start. If you think there is a trillion dollars of multifamily debt outstanding the majority of that is 10 year paper that should give you $100 billion a year turnover as you know very well, there has been a tremendous amount of floating rate debt that’s been put out there over the past several years and that if you will, will expand that $100 billion recurring out from refinancing standpoint and then the amount of investment sales activity that’s been going on is also been a big driver of it. I think one of the interesting data points is if you look at the Mortgage Bankers Association maturities graph that we have looked at many times as it relates to refinancing opportunity in the commercial real estate space. The market opportunity for multifamily in 2015 from a refinancing space was $25 billion at the beginning of the year and as we now see it’s going to be more like a $225 billion to $230 billion a year. So if you’re just focused on the refinancing opportunity from a maturity standpoint you have the very great potential to miss a very significant opportunity. With that said the slide that we put in the presentation today showing the correlation between investment sales activity and financing activity I think is really the one to keep our eye on. So if you have a robust macro environment where investors are still seeking commercial real estate and particularly seeking multifamily you’re going to have the most important driver of financing volumes in that activity. And it’s one of the reasons why we’re so excited about our investment sales business, because we continue to pick up on both of those trends. If for whatever reason investment sales activity falls off we do have that dead rock if you will of the refinancing volumes and as you know from having looked at the slide, the one asset class that continues to have refinancing that grow in 2018-19 and ‘20 is multifamily because the agencies we’re lending in 2008, 2009 and 2010. So we feel very well positioned for both the upside of an expanding economy with increased investment dollars as well as very well positioned should the market start to falter somewhat where investment sales activity falls off and we have that un-recurring business activity of the refinancing.

Okay, that’s helpful. And then last one, good return on equity thus far this year appear that would be sustainable given the mix of business you guys have, but maybe some thoughts on what could change that ROE up or down by more than just kind of a point or two since that’s kind of tough to model on near-term basis, but as we think about rescuer opportunity for let’s call to 5 point move in the ROE how should we bracket those different opportunities I guess?

Yeah Brandon I think a material alteration of our growth rate obviously would have an impact on that ROE number, to your point I think we’re pretty comfortable where the business is currently right now that we can continue to sustain higher than our target ROEs. We got to continue to invest in the platform to grow it. Clearly the other way you materially impact that as you returning capital to shareholders in some form or another and that would be another way to materially impacted.

Okay. Got it, all right. Thanks guys. Appreciate it.

Yeah.

[Operator Instructions]. Our next question is from Jordan Hymowitz from Philadelphia Financial. Your line is open.

Jordan, are you there?

Once again Jordan Hymowitz your line is open. And it appears, we have no additional questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back over to Mr. Willy Walker for any additional and closing remarks.

Great. Thank you, Steve. Thank you, Steve here, thank you, Claire. And thank you everyone for participating in the call today. And mostly thanks to W&D team for an absolutely fantastic Q3 as well as year-to-date results. And we look forward to talking to many of you during Q4 as well as at our Q4 earning call in February of next year. So thanks very much for joining us today. Have a nice day.

Thank you. This does conclude today’s conference. Please disconnect your lines. And have a wonderful day.