Brian Sereda
Analyst · National Securities. Please go ahead
Thanks Steve. As you saw at the close of market today, we issued a press release announcing our operating and financial results for the second quarter of fiscal 2017 ended June 30. I would like to now review our revenue and expense for the second quarter. As in past quarters our revenue at this stage is made up mainly of engineering and development work we’re doing for our key customer. Although we expected to grow this year historical payments have been somewhat irregular and disproportionate to the amount of resources and specific technology we’re providing. In the second quarter, we generated approximately $300,000 of engineering services revenue compared to 575,000 in the prior quarter. Although lower than the prior quarter, revenues for Q2 were approximately $118,000 higher than the engineering services revenue for the same quarter last year. In the second quarter, we're also able to lower our cash spend but before I get to that in our non-GAAP discussion, let me first review our GAAP results. Second-quarter total GAAP operating expense was $13.2 million, a slight increase of approximately of $100,000 over the prior quarter's total of $13.1 million and an increase of $2.8 million over Q2 of last year. On a quarterly basis, the increase was attributed to our $800,000 increase in stock compensation and 600,000 increases in total chip development cost offset by lower legal, marketing and other miscellaneous engineering project costs. The year-over-year GAAP expenses understandably rose as we increase headcount by 30% compared to the same period last year, however the added heads have allowed us to significantly lower our chip development cost by reducing our dependencies on external resources. Outside of core engineering the growth in active customers has also required as that has an areas of sales application engineering. Our GAAP operating loss for Q2 was $12.9 million, $445,000 higher and $2.6 million higher than the prior quarter and Q2 of last year respectively. Our net loss for the second quarter on a GAAP basis, is virtually identical to the operating numbers I just quoted or $12.9 million. On a per share basis our GAAP net loss for the second quarter was $0.63 on $20.6 million weighted average shares outstanding. This compares to a net loss of $12.5 million or $0.61 per share in Q1 and $0.62 per share loss for the same period last year. Weighted average share count for the quarter was $20.6 million against the current outstanding share count of approximately 21.9 million, which includes the recent $15 million Dialog investment. The growth in share count year-over-year is mainly a result of the completion of four private placements raising $50 million of additional working capital. Switching over to a non-GAAP year-over-year results for the quarter as we believe adjusted or non-GAAP EBITDA provides a useful comparison for investors for a company at our stage especially when used in conjunction with GAAP information. Excluding 4.7 million of stock compensation and depreciation expense from our second quarter GAAP operating loss of 12.9 million, our adjusted EBITDA or non-GAAP operating loss was $8.2 million for the second quarter, 400,000 lower than Q1 and approximately 300,000 lower than the same time last year. Operating expenses on a non-GAAP basis for Q2 totaled approximately $8.5 million approximately $700,000 lower compared with $9.2 million in the prior quarter and approximately $200,000 lower than non-GAAP operating expenses in Q2 of last year. Expanding on expenses further non-GAAP engineering expenses dropped by approximately $300,000 compared to Q1 and was approximately $500,000 lower in the same period last year primarily as a result of building our in-house engineering capabilities thereby reducing dependency on external development resources. Going forward we will continue to see some variance in our quarterly engineering spend mainly because of chip tape out schedules and other development activity, but believe we can leverage our cost structure to a large degree and focus on the engineering in part thanks for the strategic partnership with Dialog Semiconductor. Non-GAAP SG&A decreased in Q2 to $2.4 million, compared with $2.8 million in the prior quarter, as a result of lower marketing expenses as we continue to leverage Dialog sales resources and was approximately $300,000 higher than combined SG&A spending of $2.1 million in Q2 of last year. The year-over-year increase is mainly attributed to larger customer facing application engineering team. Concluding on expenses we believe we can level set our spending to a certain degree as the relationship with Dialog continues to develop. Headcount and chip development activity are now beginning to align with opportunities and the development of new technologies is now much more focused thanks to the engineering work completed in prior quarters. This is not to say we expect declining of flat lined expenses but we don’t anticipate the new development work spending despite dramatically quarter-over-quarter in absolute dollar terms. Nor do we believe we will have to ramp our headcounts significant across the board instead we expect to only add critical heads in areas of engineering to progress the technology. To wrap up we ended Q2 with approximately $13.1 million in cash and cash equivalents and zero debt. This is before adding the $15 million invested from Dialog which officially closed in early July. As Steve mentioned, we expect engineering services revenue to increase over the balance of the year. Moreover, the real test of the Dialog partnership will happen shortly as we expect to ship our first orders through them beginning in the third quarter. As I mentioned earlier, chip development activity will increase over the next few quarters impacting spending but overall expenses should be within the current ranges of prior quarters and current spending levels fluctuating with chip development and takeout cycles. Let me now turn it back to Steve for his closing remarks.