Good afternoon, and welcome to the Western Alliance Fourth Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note this event is being recorded.I would now like to turn the conference over to Ken Vecchione, President and CEO. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, and a happy New Year to everyone, and thank you for joining us today. Today, I am accompanied by Dale Gibbons, our Chief Financial Officer. I will provide an overview of the quarterly results, Dale will walk you through the bank's financial performance in greater detail, and at the conclusion of our prepared remarks we will take your questions.2019 was a record year on many level for Western Alliance Bank, and demonstrated the powerful advantages of our diversified and distinctive business model to continue advancing our key strategic objectives, which include promoting disciplined and thoughtful loan growth matched with rising deposits, carefully managing our balance sheet with regards to asset sensitivity, de-risking our loan composition, maintaining industry-leading operating efficiency, and thoughtfully returning capital to our shareholders through share buybacks and dividend.Financially, 2019 was a terrific year and was our tenth consecutive year of rising earnings. For the year, we produced record revenues of $1.1 billion, net income of $499.2 million, and EPS of $4.84. These results were driven by record organic loan and deposit growth of $3.4 billion and $3.6 respectively, which generated the highest total revenue in the company's history against the backdrop of a volatile and falling rate environment.As our bank has scaled and matured, we also took new capital management actions this year, and announced our inaugural quarterly dividend of $0.25 in Q2, and repurchased 2.8 million shares, reducing our share count by 2.7%. Given all these actions, tangible book value per share grew 20% year-over-year to $26.54, and has now grown by 237% over the past six years as we continue to expand our business.We believe shareholder value is deeply correlated to loan, deposit, and revenue growth, outstanding asset quality, and predictable and sustainable earnings. As you can see, Q4 was an…

Thanks, Ken. For the year, net interest income rose a $124.5 million or 13.6% to just over $1 billion. Net income of $499.2 million increased 53.4 or 14.5% and EPS of $4.84 increased 16.9% from the prior year demonstrating the impact of our stock repurchase program. For the fourth quarter, strong ongoing balance sheet growth resulted in record earnings despite headwinds from a flattening yield curve that preceded anticipated Fed rate cuts.Net interest income rose $5.6 million or 8% annualized from the third quarter to $272 million, driven by a $600 million increase in average earning assets, which outweighed reduced loan yields. For the corresponding period last year, net interest income rose 11.7%. The provision for credit losses was $4 million for the quarter, which was consistent with the prior period.Non-interest income decreased $3.4 million from the third quarter to $16 million as equity investment income from our Tech and Innovation segment and net gains on sales of investment securities were elevated in the third quarter. Non-interest expense was up $3.7 million as data processing, professional fees, and incentives and year-end bonuses increased by $2.9 million, $1.9 million, and $1.8 million respectively, which partially offset a $4.7 million decrease in deposit cost.Compensation costs were affected by increased accruals for annual incentive and bonus plan. Share repurchases in Q4 of 88,000 reduced the diluted share count to 102 million, resulting in diluted EPS of $1.25 for the quarter. Throughout 2019, we reduced shares outstanding by 2.7% by opportunistically repurchasing 2.8 million shares. For 2020, our board has authorized a new share repurchase plan for up to $250 million.Turning to net interest drivers, net interest income for the quarter rose $28.5 million year-over-year to a record $272 million. Investment yield decreased 12 basis points from the prior quarter to 2.96% due to…

Thanks, Dale. On the heels of achieving several corporate milestones in 2019, we are excited by the growth opportunities in both our regional and national business lines in 2020. We continue to hold to the belief that predictable EPS and tangible book value growth will drive industry-leading total shareholder return. In 2020, we expect to, one, continue to thoughtfully and conservatively grow loans, our pipelines appear strong and we expect to grow loans between $600 million to $800 million per quarter funded by deposit growth. Balance sheet growth will drive net interest income growth despite marginal NIM compression. As deposits come back in Q1 and Q2, our liquidity will rise placing some pressure on margin as we continue our residential real estate diversification strategy.Given the backdrop of a flat rate environment, our efficiency ratio should remain stable your current levels throughout the year even as we continue to invest in technology and new products. These actions should position us to continue industry-leading return on average assets and return on average tangible common equity.At this time, we'll field your question. Operator, would you open up the line please?

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Timur Braziler of Wells Fargo Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning.

Good morning.

Good morning.

Starting with the margins, it looks like NIM benefited from some higher loan fees and pretty impressive reduction and funding costs during the quarter, I'm just wondering how big of a step down do you think is going to take place in 1Q assuming that loan fees normalize, and I would love to hear about your expectations on future possibilities to cut deposit costs.

Yes, so you're correct, it was a little higher than what we guided to. I think our poor margin for the fourth quarter was about a 435, if you kind of back that off, and then from there going forward, we are going to continue to whittle down the margin based upon the execution of our residential mortgage program as that becomes an increasingly large proportion of our loan portfolio. We stated that we think that's going to be maybe two basis points a month or quarter. In any case, we can kind of easily earn through that in terms of net interest income by the balance sheet growth that we expect to have. If we don't see any more rate increases, and I realize the futures market still has one in there, I think it might be unlikely that we're going to see one frankly in 2020 before the election, but if we don't see any, I think the opportunity for increased funding cost reduction is fairly limited. I think we have gotten the rates down a lot. We are a little more of a compressed yield environment as we were on the way up when rates were lower, but we're good with the margin kind of in the 430 range, and we believe we can execute upon that.

And then, switching over to the expenses, as you look at the pipeline for future projects, expenses grew roughly 15% on a core basis in 2019. Is that a good type of run rate to think of for 2020, or is the slower revenue growth going to correlate to a slower expense growth?

Well, I expect that we're going to be able to hold our efficiency ratio essentially kind of where it is, and kind of the lower 40s, and we believe that we can continue to grow with that and increase funds that we have. We've been investing in to improve the products and services and the feature functionality of our systems. During 2019, for example, we had significant outlays to improve the experience for HOA clients, and that we think was instrumental to the very strong growth we had there. We expect to do the same. So, I would look for our efficiency ratio to be fairly flat as we go through 2020.

Okay, and then just one last one for me, looking at the residential mortgage growth and the punitive treatment of resi mortgages under CECL, does that all change your appetite to grow that lending category, and I guess, how should we be thinking about provisioning as that becomes a larger component of the loan book?

Yes, so it's only punitive if it has a kind of a large charge associated with it. Of course, residential loans do have a much longer duration than what some of our average loan length have been, and so that could have an effect, but the types of residential loans we're acquiring, that is LTVs in the 60s, FICOs 750-760, debt-to-income in the mid-30s. Those metrics result in a very low estimated annual charge-off, and so, even when I multiply that by a duration factor, it's still a low number. So, increasing our proportion of our loan book into residential is not going to be increasing our overall reserve in a CECL world above the 100 basis points. So, I don't see an increase there. In fact, it could dribble down slightly.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Michael Young of SunTrust. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks for taking the question. I wanted to first ask just maybe about the competitive landscape in particular and some of the national business lines like mortgage warehouse. Do you see an opportunity to take more in market share, or grow at a faster rate any of them in 2020, given some market disruption from acquisitions?

Yes. This is Ken. Overall, I would say the competitive landscape hasn't really changed for the entire book of business. As it relates to warehouse lending, yes, we see some opportunities for disruption there, and we see some opportunity to take advantage both on the loan side and on the deposit side.

Okay. And just, Dale, maybe a follow up on the one-to-four family strategy you mentioned continuing that this year, what's kind of the overall eventual goal there? It sounds like you're pretty well-positioned from an ALCO perspective right now, but should we expect you to go all the way to kind of a neutral balance on the ALCO?

I don't think we'll get that far. What we see about this is it strengthens the relationship with our mortgage warehouse clients, it mitigates our interest rate risk, it positions us in an asset class that we think is going to perform very well throughout the credit cycle. In 2018, we had very strong deposit growth, and it's like, well, this is a great go-to asset to take advantage of to again improve earnings, improve earnings per share growth, and we're getting yields well above what we could do if we were buying residential mortgage-backed securities, for example. I don't expect us to necessarily get to 30% or something like that, where the peer group is, but we have plenty of runway to grow 2020, 2021, 2022, it basically kind of the same pace as we did in 2019, and we think that gives us a sustained kind of a growth model assuming that we have the funding sources to be able to apply them.

Okay, maybe just one last one on the share buyback versus dividend increase, kind of how are you guys feeling about deploying capital through one versus the other at this point, or are there M&A opportunities we should be thinking of?

So, for us, as you look at capital, when we started the year, we said that about two-thirds of our capital that's generated is used to support organic growth. We ended the year with about three quarters of the organic capital that we generate support growth. So, our first and foremost best use of capital is for organic growth. The dividend policy has been set, and then lastly, we will be as we always say opportunistic when either the stock show some weakness or the overall markets show some weakness to come in and buy.

Okay, thanks.

Our next question comes from Chris McGratty of KBW. Please go ahead.

Great, thanks. Ken, maybe the M&A aspect of that question, could you elaborate, you've got your multiple up a little bit, could you remind us market size, what you're seeing in terms of books that might interest you? Thanks.

So, at this time, there is really nothing going on the M&A front, and we are rather quiet there, as we see better opportunities to grow our business organically, and quite frankly, that's where we're spending most of our time. We have a viewpoint into 2020 that says it's going to look a little bit like 2019 in terms of the momentum that we had in '19, and by sticking organically, we'll see or have less execution risk with an organic strategy then if you do an acquisition. In addition, the market has not been kind to acquiring banks as you know. So, at this point, we're in the very fortunate place of saying, we don't need to do an acquisition for revenue growth, loan growth. We don't need to do an acquisition to take out expenses, and we don't need one, so that we can move our EPS or net income up. So, we have as much optionality as one would want, and right now, as I said, all quiet on the M&A front, and we're spending a lot of our time on looking how to continue to organically grow.

That's great color, thanks. Just one more, I think in the past you have guided to that 600 a quarter, Dale, of growth, you've obviously come in well above that in recent quarters, I think the comments were 600 to 800, is that just marking to market kind of how you've been performing, exceeding guidance, or that -- are you trying to send a message that, "Hey, we feel even stronger about growth going into 2020?"

We're building our plans around that $600 million to $800 million bogey there, some quarters are may be closer to six, and some quarters and maybe 800 or more as you seen, this quarter was a billion and the last couple of quarters it was a billion. So, we are looking, and I think what the most important thing here is asset quality that will drive us to the right decision in terms of growth. Right now the asset quality appears good, appears good in our overall book, and we're not seeing a lot of deals that are being won on structure, meaning, they're loosening up covenants, we're not seeing that. So, we feel comfortable in this $600 million to $800 million range, and you'll get the mark-to-market at the end of next quarter and see how we do against that.

Great, thank you.

Our next question comes from Casey Haire of Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning, guys.

Good morning.

We're just following up on sort of the capital management. You know, would you guys ever entertain a special dividend that's, an option that you guys have not used. It could be compelling if the stock price seems high and that the buyback is not an option.

Yes, first let's remember, we have a long history of dividends distributions of two consecutive quarters. And so, I think we want to get ahead of that until at least we hit four. So, we're going to continue on with a dividend quarterly growth, we're going to always talk to the board about the best way to return capital to our shareholders. And it's really, I think, really too early at this point to start thinking about special dividends. Specifically, as you see, we moved the amount of capital we're using for organic means, up from two-thirds to three quarters. So, we are trying to find, you know, good thoughtful conservative managed loans to bring onto the balance sheet.

Got you, and to that -- and so on the loan growth front, if I look at Slide 11, and your outlook for 2020. You see that loan growth mix sort of tracking. That loan growth mix in 2020 tracking that same level of C&I ready and CRA?

Well, the nice thing about our distinctive business model is that we get to move capital around all throughout the year to take advantage of the best returns, and where we think the credit is the strongest, and where sometimes competition is a little less active. So as we plan through the 2020 cycle, generally just about every business has the same growth rate to try to achieve. As we execute, that becomes a different story, as we look almost daily or weekly, as we look to move capital around to where we find the best opportunities, and that really has been the success of one of the reasons Western Alliance has been so successful.

I mean, I would expect a construction fees, we're under 10 now to hover in the kind of the nine to 10 range, the residential is going to be continue to climb from 10 now, I think that's going to certainly go into the team. And the others, as Ken mentioned, depend upon kind of the best risk adjusted returns that we have within those categories.

Okay. Thanks. And just last question for me on credit quality. Dale, it sounds like the outlook is very clean, there's nothing systemic that you see. Everyone's very impressed with your ability to keep the NCOs low.But I mean, when you -- a lot of investors out there would say like, it's only so sustainable given the risk profile, can you just give us some thoughts as to what when you see some of your peers catch a commercial credit, and the leverage loan book comes to mind specifically with you guys. What are you guys doing differently that is enabling you to avoid, catching these credits?

Right. This is Ken -- first half, half a step back, big picture. Our portfolio today looks fine. We don't see any economic stress from the economy. And to answer your more specific question, we think are well diversified portfolio, which again, is consistent with this business model we have helps us to avoid some pitfalls. So for example, we don't do energy loans. We've gotten out of solar. We have very little QSR loans on the bus. We don't have large retail malls. These are all things that we have stopped doing years ago or maybe a year ago. So we're trying to look for where we see there where there's possible to some credit hiccups and avoid that. Next, back to the national business lines, the national business lines for the most part. We've never seen losses. So let's go through timeshare. We've never had a loss and the team that's running it has never had a loss in 35 years. Warehouse lending, we've had that business 10, going on 11 years, never had a loss and this is the full lending. We've had one small loss for $400,000 over the last 10 years. Even our hotel book is very well positioned when I, if you want to talk about our debt service coverage ratio, or LTV and our debt yield for example. So we've been fortunate to be playing in spaces in the national business lines that other banks do not play in and remember the national business lines have four characteristics to them. One generally there's less competition, which allows us to have fairly good pricing power or pricing stability, good operating leverage and last but not least, as I described, good asset quality.Dale, do you want to add anything to that?

Yes, regarding the corporate finance notes that you mentioned, we monitor those, those are liquid loans and we monitor that pricing daily, if there's a price deterioration that's going on, if we don't understand why that is, it's what sell first and then ask questions later. So we'll cut a particular haircut down or something like that and get out and we really move quickly on those types of deals.

Great, thank you.

Our next question comes from Brad Milsaps of Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

Hi, Ken, Dale.

Hi Brad.

Okay, I was just curious if you could update us on maybe the number of new producers you hired in 2019. And kind of what your appetite would be for new revenue producers in 2020?

Yes, we've been rather fortunate that through most of our businesses, we've not had large attrition in our revenue producers, I will say, but with a little more competitive up in Northern California in the tech and innovation business, but relatively speaking, we're not pushing heavily to bring in new producers given the runway that we see in front of us, and some of the businesses that we started certainly on the loan initiatives that we started in 2018 and in 2019, both of our two loan initiatives had great results. So we brought in people there earlier in 2018 and we needed to but to get them comfortable with our way of doing business.

In terms of the FTE increase, a good portion of that has really been to increase infrastructure. So those have been in operation tonight in IT areas and also kind of personnel development for that. As Ken mentioned, most of the positions we've had in terms of frontline producers have been fairly static over the past year.

Yes, that's where my next question, it sounds like you've got plenty of capacity on staff without really having to add any additional revenue producers in a big way?

Yes, I think that's fair.

And if maybe as a follow-up, as you look at your $600 million to $800 million quarterly loan in deposit goal, which side of that would be looks easier to attain against backdrop of being maybe more selective with credit versus it's always difficult to grow deposits. Just kind of curious which pipeline might be bigger or which side of that equation, you kind of feel better about as you move through the year based on kind of what you see in the pipeline?

It's funny, our pipeline conversations change almost weekly depending on when deals are going to close or when people are making their customer calls. So quite frankly, they both have the same probability of occurring. I just think you may see some, we're not that good to make sure every quarter is exactly lined up. But if you look at 2019 as an example, it did eventually line up very, very well. If you go back to 2019 Q1, deposits came out of the chute very, very strong, loans were okay. And then it ended just the reverse with loans being very strong and deposits being okay. But net-net loans grew $3.4 billion, deposits grew $3.6 billion. So that's what we're trying to do is to kind of, as I said in my outlook to have deposits match the loan growth.

I like getting the deposits and I like leading with deposits, I think that gives you that, that really gives you inventory that you can find alternatives. If it's a bad economy, we can go to residential, if we think things are growing, we've got a more expansive kind of products array on the loan side that we can offer. If we continue to sustain good core deposit growth, that's going to drive improving earnings per share.

Great. Thank you, guys. Nice quarter.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Gary Tenner of D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Just one question for me in terms of the $4 million of non-recurring items in the quarter, could you give any detail on that? Was it severance, was it tech write-downs, just any kind of background there?

Yes, so I mean, we kind of enumerated a little bit but yes, so we had a very strong 2019, we had an accrual catch-up in terms of incentive compensation that we recognized. We continue to build out as I mentioned on one particular product with regarding HOA but both infrastructure regarding future functionality of products, regulatory compliance and sustaining what we need to do there as well. So it's a little bit elevated in the fourth quarter in terms of kind of what those charges came in, but in some respects, they're going to continue, as I mentioned, we're going to expect to have basically a stable efficiency ratio going forward which means that our revenue growth in dollars is going to be more than double what we're going to be increasing expense.

Okay. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Brock Vandervliet of UBS. Please go ahead.

Thanks, good morning.

Good morning, Brock.

Good morning. Dale, just going back to your deposit pricing comment, it sounded like there wasn't, you weren't expecting much scope there to further down deposit costs and just wanted to talk about that?

Sure, yes, I know -- so we got in front of I think the market rates were coming down. I mean we moved within hours after each of the equities to the Fed changes. And today, where we see our pricing relative to kind of the competitive environment is we don't see that, we've got a whole lot of latitude relative to what others are paying, and of course we have these kind of odds, everyone does, these online banks that are charging or providing returns much, much higher than that when local institutions do. So that doesn't mean there isn't some kind of changes we can kind of make on the margin. But I think people have kind of settled into kind of the term structure of the yield curve that we have today. And I think it's been fairly quiet out there for rate changes, not just for us, but for the market of late as well.

Okay. And others have asked about this as well, but within that resi portfolio and these rates 475 loan yields, let's say 140 bps above agency conforming, could you talk about what's in there and a little bit more detail number one, and number two as this portfolio grows relative to other components, do you think there could be a leak down in the reserve given that this may have a lower some benefit under CECL which you may have alluded to?

Yes, it does. It does have some benefit under CECL and it could kind of whittle down maybe over time. Of course, CECL, you're always in this process of kind of reconfirming and testing and testing your models and back testing them. So there could be other changes that might take place, but so a couple of things, one is we're not intending to buy agency qualifying paper. So that is part of the reason that picks us up in yield. So we're not expecting to kind of bundle this up and ship it off to Fannie, Freddie or anything like that. So from our warehouse clients, we're buying some of the stuff that doesn't qualify to their primary liquidity channel, which is one of these DSCs. So what do we buy, so there's some jumbo in there, it's not a lot. The average balance on this stuff is under $500,000. But there is some jumbo that doesn't qualify as there's a significant piece of something that isn't owner occupied. So these could be vacation home or something else that could make it ineligible for these agencies to pick-up. But again, we're looking for things that make improve the yield to us but don't increase the risk. So again, these are really low. These are low LTV loans, they're good to high FICO scores, but it's not necessarily their primary residence. We also look for things that are, maybe there's some defect in the process that makes them ineligible for it. There's been like timing on right of rescission. There's been kind of what.

Just a documentation, they have a slight imperfection.

Yes, and so we'll take those and we get a cheaper price for it.

Got it. Okay, great. Thank you.

Our next question comes from David Chiaverini of Wedbush Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks. Couple of questions for you, so follow-up first on the deposit discussion, what's giving you confidence on the deposit side to fund that increased growth of $600 million to $800 million, is it new initiatives or getting more entrenched in existing businesses, just curious there?

Yes, I think there are a couple of things. One, the way our business is structured, we have an HOA business; again, you've heard us say that grew over deposits over $600 million. We put money against it for technology. We think that technology improvement has allowed us to bring in more deposits this year. So that channel helps us. The tech and innovation channel generally brings in deposits on a two to one basis. Our warehouse lending channel with all the ways we touched the warehouse lending clients allows us to bring in deposits that are one-to-one. So we have a number of channels just that created its own national momentum for us to grow. And then, things we always say, we're a pay for performance culture, so everyone's out looking to get deposits, we don't do a loan without getting the operating accounts, we've got minimum liquidity requirements in our loan docs. In case, you don't hold your deposits at a certain level, we have an opportunity to re-price your loan, your yield. So, it's all those things.As it relates to the loan initiatives, we've gotten a little traction on the loan, sorry, the deposit initiatives, we've gotten a little traction there. We grew both of those over $100 million. We are still keeping our eye on that. We'd rather be a little slower and right, and give the clients the best customer service experience, tends to be fast bring in stuff and not service the client, and since we have the opportunity through these other channels to bring in deposits, we can take it a little slower on the new initiatives and wait to when we feel ready to go out and bring them in at a faster pace, but our new initiatives had a great year. I mean tech and innovation up a $1 billion, HOA up $600 million. So it's been both.

That's helpful. And should we expect a similar mix in that deposit growth between interest bearing and non-interest bearing?

Yes, I think if we can hold our own on interest bearing dollars, I think that's doing pretty well on non-interest bearing dollar. So I mean, I could see over time and particularly price rise, that's going to be a little more difficult. So I would like to hold our own dollars on the non-interest bearing side, maybe most of the growth comes from interest bearing.

Got it. Thanks very much.

Our next question is from Jon Arfstrom of RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning, guys.

Good morning.

A couple of follow-ups, Ken, you talked about going where competition is less active, is that the case in the CLD book? I'm just curious yields look good. And you're a little bit under 10%, and just curious what your thought is on that book going forward?

Yes, so, on that book we're going to flow between 9% and 10%. This quarter, as it relates to the percentage used to our multi-numerator and the denominator impact, denominator went up a $1 billion, and we focused on the numerator and that came down $203 million. We primarily did that through pricing. So, we priced up a little bit. We did get some deals at our pricing, and the ones we didn't get, well, we waited for loans to roll off the books, we didn't replace them, and that's how we brought the ratio down. But some of the aspects of what we do in that book, the competition is not any more competitive than it's been for the last two or three years.

Okay, good. And then, your ability to get there a year early, it's just simply what you just said pricing and letting some things roll off.

And the denominator.

Okay. And then two other follow-ups, the other national business line growth was really strong for the quarter, you talked a bit about the mortgage warehouse, anything else to call out in that segment?

I don't think anything pops right off the top of my head, I think it's really the growth was in those segments.

Okay. And then, last one, tech spending is the other area that you called out in your expense guidance. You mentioned HOA, but talk a little bit about the initiatives and where you're spending the tech money, where it's focused? Thanks.

Yes. So, our spending is really targeted against the client satisfaction and offering products and improved service, and my hypothesis is that, I think a lot of banks are going to pull back in 2020, because they don't have the growth aspects that we have, and I don't think they're going to service their clients to the level that the clients want to be serviced at. So, I think by continuing to improve our service offering, I think one will have happy clientele, and number two, as you saw in HOA, we'll be able to either hold deposits or bring in more deposits.

Okay. Yes, a lot of your peers are talking about expense programs, no doubt about it. Thank you.

Okay, you got it.

Our next question comes from Tyler Stafford of Stephens. Please go ahead.

Hey good morning, guys, and thanks for taking the question. When I compared the management outlook slide in -- for 2020 in the deck release yesterday to the outlook slide, last year, you guys kept the loan and deposit growth the same, the interest margin the same, the operating leverage the same, and the asset quality the same, but this year, you added earnings to it. Obviously, the outlook is very favorable that you guys have talked about so far this call. I'm just curious given that you added that to the slide, if you wanted to comment just around the pace for earnings growth, or how comfortable you felt with earnings growth in 2020, especially given a lot of your peers are not growing earnings? Thanks.

Yes, one, it's good to hear that we're rather consistent year-over-year with loan and deposit growth interest margin operating levers and asset quality. The point of earnings was the cumulative effect of all of that. We'll produce year-over-year earnings, and we -- again, as we said in our prepared remarks, higher earnings, higher tangible book value will lead to better valuation over the long-term, and to distinguish ourselves from our peer group that may have a little trouble growing earnings, I think only helps us.

Okay, thanks, Ken. And then just going back to the buyback, would you expect to fully utilize the authorization this year?

I'm not going to make a forecast on that other than to say, think about how we've done it so far, and I think we've done it in a very managed and prudent way. When there's plenty of growth, that growth is supported by capital. We realized we're running with a little more capital, we initiated a dividend, and if -- again, if the stock looks weak, if the market takes down everyone, we'll have enough ammunition to come in and support the stock and buy what we hope will be at attractive pricing.

Okay, understood. Congrats on a very strong quarter.

Thank you very much.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the conference back over to Ken Vecchione for any closing remarks.

Well, thank you all for joining us, and we look forward to talking to you a couple months from now. Thank you.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.