Greetings and welcome to the NCR Voyix Q4 2024 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Sarah Jane Schneider, Vice President, Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.

Good morning and thank you for joining our fourth quarter 2024 earnings conference call. This morning, we issued our earnings release reporting financials for the quarter ended December 31, 2024. A copy of the earnings release and the presentation that we will reference during this call are available on the Investor Relations section of our website, which can be found at ncrvoyix.com and have been filed with the SEC. With me on the call today are Jim Kelly, our Chief Executive Officer; Brian Webb-Walsh, our Chief Financial Officer; Benny Tadele, President, Restaurants; and Darren Wilson, President, Retail. This call is being recorded and the webcast is available on the Investor Relations section of our website. Before we begin, please be advised that remarks today will contain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. For additional information on these factors, please refer to our earnings release and our other reports filed with the SEC. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these statements. Forward-looking statements during this call speak only as of the date of this call, and we undertake no obligation to update them. In addition, we will be discussing or providing certain non-GAAP financial measures today, which we believe will provide additional clarity regarding our ongoing performance. For a full reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures discussed in this call to the most comparable GAAP measure in accordance with SEC regulations, please see our press release furnished as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed this morning and our supplemental materials available on the Investor Relations section of our website. With that, I would now like to turn the call over to Jim.

Thanks, Sarah Jane and good morning. I would like to welcome all of you to our fourth quarter earnings call. I am Jim Kelly, NCR Voyix’s newly appointed Chief Executive Officer. As you may know, I was appointed Independent Chair of the Board of Directors in October of ‘23, followed by Executive Chair in May of last year. This 15-month period allowed me to gain keen insights into our operations, products, customers and strategy before stepping into my new role. Ahead of discussing our fourth quarter results, I wanted to share my initial observations of the company. I accepted my current position as I believe we have a strong foundation upon which to execute our growth objectives and would like to elaborate on what I view as our key strengths. Beginning with our competitive positioning, the company has an extensive track record supporting some of the largest global retail and restaurant brands and is today the number one in self-checkout and point-of-sale software for convenience and fuel, grocery and restaurants. While the sales cycle for enterprise point-of-sale is very competitive. Once committed, we generally maintain these relationships for over 10 years, sometimes as long as 30 years. This is clearly illustrated by our strong revenue retention of 98% over the last 3 years. The second is our platform. Over the past 5 years, the company has invested significantly in our platform to meet the growing demands of restaurants and retailers around the globe. We have several paths to connect customers to the platform. This enables existing customers to access real-time insights and additional functionality avoiding a wholesale point-of-sale conversion. The success of this approach is reflected in our high-teens revenue growth in the enterprise platform customers and represents 15% of total company software and services revenue. Further, we have approximately…

Thanks, Jim. In the fourth quarter, our restaurant business signed more than 200 new software and services customers, including an enterprise restaurant as we also converted more than 135 existing customers to our platform. Our platform and payment sites increased by 6% and 8% respectively. Software ARR increased 3% and total ARR increased 4% in the quarter. In our enterprise division, we won a multiyear platform and payments contract with Yogurtland through a competitive process to service their 200 stores across the U.S. We will provide Aloha Cloud point-of-sale in addition to data and analytics capabilities, integrated online ordering and third-party delivery management. Our proprietary software and payment solution will enable Yogurtland to centralize store data and online ordering, while reducing in-store hardware and cost of ownership. As you highlighted earlier, we are focused on converting existing software customers to our platform. For example, in Q4, we converted Brinker International, a leading casual dining restaurant company and operator of Chili’s and Maggiano’s to enable them to minimize cost and disruption as they continue to grow their brands. Internationally, we signed an $80 million end-to-end services contract with one of the largest global fast food chains for their business in the U.K. and Ireland. We displaced the incumbent provider through a competitive process due to our comprehensive managed services offering. Beginning this year, we provide this customer with increased support and efficiency to improve services outcomes for franchisees, restaurant crew members and corporate employees. We look to expand our services agreement with this customer across their global footprint over time. Finally, our payments attach rate remains strong with essentially all new customers attaching payments to their contract this quarter. As we implement our processing agreement with Worldpay later this year, we’ll focus on aggressively cross-selling payments into our enterprise base to drive additional growth. I will now turn the call over to Darren to discuss our retail performance.

Thanks, Benny. Good morning, everyone. Like Jim, I briefly wanted to introduce myself as the President of our Retail segment. Following a career in payments, I joined NCR Voyix initially in a strategic role, before being appointed President, International in November of 2024. These roles provided me excellent insight into the company, its customers and operations. Now turning to our performance, in the fourth quarter, our retail business signed more than 35 customers, leading to nearly 700 additional sites. Our platform sites increased by 46%, software ARR increased by 5% and total ARR increased 6% in the quarter. As an example of our platform execution, we renewed and expanded our agreements with two large grocery chains in Europe and the U.K. to upgrade their existing point-of-sale to our platform later this year. Further, we will provide self-checkout and value-added platform solutions in addition to help desk services to enhance support for these customers. Similarly, we signed a new 5-year contract with a national grocery chain in Japan to provide our point-of-sale solution connected to the platform across their store footprint. Finally, as we announced earlier this month, we renewed and expanded a longstanding government relationship with a Defense Commissary Agency for a total contract value of $335 million. Under the agreement, we will provide software support, including catalog, ordering, receiving, pricing and point-of-sale in addition to hardware maintenance to nearly 250 military sites around the world. As Jim outlined, we will continue to focus on winning additional customers and expanding our existing agreements at the time of renewal as we move through 2025. And with that, I will turn the call over to Brian. Brian?

Thank you, Darren and good morning everyone. Before discussing our fourth quarter performance, I would like to provide a brief update on the hardware ODM implementation. Our team in Ennoconn are working very closely through the details of the transition. Ennoconn needs to fully replicate our infrastructure and technology before the ODM agreement can become operational to ensure there is no disruption to our customers. As such, we expect to continue to recognize hardware revenue for most of 2025, which will be reflected in our full year guidance. Exiting hardware will improve our recurring revenue composition from approximately 60% to 75% once the ODM is operational. As part of the company’s continued shift to our recurring software and services model in addition to hardware, we are exiting certain one-time software licenses and services, which totaled $60 million for 2024. This will further improve our revenue composition to 80% recurring. The profit contribution related to these certain one-time items has been offset by cost reductions we are implementing in Q1. We are committed to becoming a primarily recurring software and services company as quickly as possible while continuing to deliver an end-to-end offering to our restaurant and retail customers. Lastly, as it relates to our normalized financial measures, we expect the two remaining Atleos countries to be exited during the first half of this year. These countries are included in our reported results for the fourth quarter and full year 2024. However, we’ll continue to exclude the revenue and adjusted EBITDA impacts on our ‘25 guidance. Once exited, the financials from these countries will be reflected in discontinued operations for all historical periods. For the quarter, reported revenue was $682 million and normalized revenue was $678 million, reflecting a decline of 14% due to the expected weakness in hardware sales. Software…

Thank you. We will now be conducting the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] The first question is from Kartik Mehta from Northcoast Research. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning. Jim, maybe just on the payments agreement that you announced, it seems like that could be a significant opportunity for you going forward. Maybe if you could just elaborate on the timing of when you think you could start seeing a benefit of that and how long that could take in terms of achieving kind of full benefit?

Good morning, Kartik. Yes, as you saw or heard in the comments that I made, $500 billion is a big number. It actually translates into 12 billion transactions. Unfortunately, while I think it was a good move by Mike, the prior CEO or two prior CEOs ago, in bringing payments to the company, because software, as you know, has been aligning with payments significantly over the last several – probably over the last 10 years. Unfortunately, the JetPay platform just did not have the capabilities, it could support restaurant, but it could not support the retail organization just given the complexities of different fuel issuers and other complexities of the restaurant space. So my expectation is that this will be live by the end of the summer at the latest, because we’ll be migrating some of the accounts that are currently with the prior provider on to JetPay – excuse me, on to Worldpay. And then in addition, as soon as the system is operational, which could be as early as the spring before the conversion will start migrating – will start selling new retail customers domestically. And then also, as I said, we are going to start rolling it out to Latin America and Europe, probably the next two markets to take advantage of their footprint in both regions. And just to give you an order of magnitude, if you go back to our – my previous company, EVO, we had close to $700 million of revenue and we did about $150 billion in volume. So this is multiples in terms of size. And again, as I said, this is a completely new revenue source for the company. It’s one that I think they would have liked to have achieved previous. We have worked on this for a number of months. And fortunately, I think Worldpay has been a great partner to work with to get to an agreement that will enable us to sell this along with our sales of product and services into our base as well as new customers.

Thanks, Jim. And just as a follow-up, Darren, obviously a new role for you, congrats on that. But I was wondering as you’ve looked at the business kind of one or two opportunities you think you can take advantage of in 2025?

Hi, Kartik. Thanks for the question. Yes, there is huge opportunities across all our markets. The kind of pivot to our next generation solutions and kind of recurring revenue models, especially in the services space as well, is a real untapped potential. So we’ve got a number of customers in the pipe in terms of our future state product, which are going through implementation now, which is why we didn’t name any of them in the quarter. But I think you’ll hear over the next couple of quarters, announcements of some pretty significant next-generation opportunities that include both our next product line, but also our services opportunity, so – and then bolt-on later in the year, the payments functionality too. There is plenty of channel opportunities there.

Perfect. Thank you both. Appreciate it.

Thanks, Kartik.

The next question is from Will Nance from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Hey, appreciate you taking the question. First question on the software services outlook, I hear you on the exiting of the licensing arrangements and the tough compares that that generates for the year. Could you talk about just what is the remaining exposure to software licensing and how do you think about sort of the cadence of exiting these structures over time? How long would this be a drag on total revenue?

Well, thanks again for the question. I think what we’re laying out is a direction that we’re heading. So as we said in the script, we kind of pro forma what the impact would be would there be some onetime licensing that will occur this year, likely that will be the case. But the direction I’ve given to the sales organization through both Benny and Darren is that for the company, as we look forward, we’re going to sign up customers on a subscription basis for the reasons that we stated in the script. Because in the end, it’s better for them and obviously, it’s better for us, so that we have better line of sight. NCR has been around for a long time. And it seems like the model that was in place years ago just perpetuated itself and it was what was sold previously. But we’re going to take a more direct and aggressive stance going forward with new customers and even the existing customers. The company had already started this path. David had this underway of last year, and we’re just going to make a bigger push going forward. And that’s why Brian in his prepared comments identified the impact. So it’s not a large number, but it obviously has some impact. I think Brian wants to add to this.

I would just add that at the end of the year, if we execute like we think we are going to, there is probably $30 million to $40 million of software, one-time software license revenue still left, but it will be mostly gone.

Got it. That’s helpful. So presumably, if you continue to exit these things, the drag in 2026 is lower than the, I think, $60 million that you outlined today?

Yes, agree.

If you look at what’s occurred last year, a lot of this was the restructuring efforts after the spin, selling digital banking we would have liked to had ODM done by the end of the year, but some technology challenges gotten the way and ultimately, we want to make sure that our customers see no impact to this change, but there is other aspects of the business now on the sales side as well as repositioning how we are going to be a software product company going forward and those steps are being implemented this year.

Got it. Okay. That makes sense. Okay. And then the second question was just on the hardware outlook. So understanding there is some gross versus net that we need to think about on the revenue outlook for hardware. Is there any way you could share on a like-for-like basis how the outlook compares to the $100 million of revenue you gave pro forma for the ODM deal previously? And just as a follow-up on the first quarter outlook, I think last year, you called out pretty significant headwinds from people delaying hardware refreshes. Is that still happening? Is that why you are calling out another tough comp in the first quarter this year?

Yes. So first on the question around the pro forma revenue, if we take the gross hardware and move it to net in the metrics file that we published, you can see how we finished the year with that metric. And we had said the pro forma business would be $21.50 in revenue, and we ended up at $21.71. We said that the pro forma EBITDA, we are targeting $4.30 we ended up at $4.19. So the margin was about 19.3%. So we essentially performed in line with what we said. As you think about hardware for this year, we’re giving our guidance based on gross hardware just because we anticipate spending most of the year selling hardware directly. And you can see, if you look at the midpoint of our guidance, we’re down about 22%. But I would say that the pro forma revenue has held up in line with what we expected last year. When I think about hardware in general, yes, last year and this year, we’re having pressure because people are doing less refreshes. Our customers are doing less refreshes. But specifically, if I think about the cadence of this year, we had one large customer that did do a lot of activity in Q1 last year, that now their activity is spread this year more between Q2 and Q4. And so that’s giving us a timing issue on hardware. So the rate of revenue decline moderates as we go through the year because of that and as we ramp deals that we sold in the second half of last year around software and services. A lot of our big deals that Darren and Benny mentioned, they ramp in the second half.

That’s very helpful. Appreciate all the details and thanks for taking the question.

Thank you.

The next question is from Charles Nabhan from Stephens Inc. Please go ahead.

Good morning and thank you for taking my questions. My first question is on the government contract. I think you had said it’s a 5-year deal for 300 – total contract value of $335 million. Could you give us a little detail in terms of how much of that is incremental? I don’t know if you already had a relationship with them? And secondly, how we should think about the timing of that – the revenue recognition there?

Yes. So that is a longstanding relationship we have, but it did expand pretty meaningfully. And so we are getting incremental revenue from that contract this year, and it starts to ramp towards the end of the first quarter in so we’ll start to see revenue pick up.

Got it. And just a quick follow-up on the guide, in terms of the revenue growth, how should we think about that from a recurring versus nonrecurring standpoint? And then secondly, if you could just touch on any remaining efficiency initiatives you have in place and the potential impact on margins in the coming year as well.

Yes. So, recurring revenues grow – expected to grow nicely in both retail and restaurants this year, 4% to 5%. And so all the pressure is coming from the non-recurring both the hardware that we have talked about and then one-time revenue around services partially because we are exiting it on purpose. And then just with the hardware being down, the pressure from the install revenue. So, that’s how we see that kind of playing out. And then when we think about costs, there is about $100 million of cost actions we are taking this year, 70% of that is around our vendors. We have been working a vendor program for the last four months or five months that involves in-sourcing key functions, and just finding efficiencies with our vendors. And then the other 30% is related to our headcount, and that’s mostly being actioned in the first quarter. And so those cost actions will ramp as we go through the year, and that’s the timing of the revenue kind of moderating and the cost actions ramping is why EBITDA will sequentially improve as we go through the year.

And this is Jim. Just to add some color to that. So, that is – those actions now have a lot to do with exiting the one-time services that the company, I think became accustomed to over the years as opposed to teams of people supporting our existing customer base. I think that’s, as I have said in my comments, that’s clearly one of the differentiators for our company, 8,000 people, thousands of which are in the field supporting our customers. And it’s not feasible to support these large multinationals without a team with people on the ground in their locations, delivering service, whether it’s delivering equipment or delivering solutions on software and implementations. And to the extent in the past, some of the services provided were more one-time in nature. As we are shifting away from a one-time business to a recurring business, that’s where you are seeing these reductions come in. They didn’t take place last year, largely because we had existing SOWs that were in place. So, it wasn’t feasible. But as we start this year and reposition the company for a more recurring model, then there is obviously some consequences associated with that.

Got it. Appreciate all the color.

Thank you.

The next question is from Ian Zaffino from Oppenheimer & Company. Please go ahead.

Hi. Can you guys just talk about the retail environment right now and expectations for growth there? Thanks.

That’s a pretty broad question. Thanks Ian. Hopefully, we are covering the globe in terms of retail coverage. So, to zero in on one territory market is interesting, and we can explore that offline. That said, the – despite the hardware situation that Brian outlined, we are actually seeing very active conversations in – on all of our markets, both in terms of expansion. And in terms of services solutions or software solutions from existing customers, but a lot of active new logo opportunities out there with customers looking to upgrade their efficiencies in their estates, but also adding new lanes, new sites, etcetera. So, it’s having been at the last two retail trade shows, both in New York and in Germany. The flow-through on the stems [ph] was probably a record level in terms of interest in kind of next-gen type solutions and very much under the services efficiency. Shrink continues to be a significant issue in grocery or any self-checkout environment. So, there is a lot of interest in helping retailers kind of improve both their efficiencies and their losses. So – and we have the product range and solution lines to cover that. So, it’s buoyant, I would say.

Yes. I would add to that. If you look at – go back to the comments I made on the growth in the platform itself, a 26% growth in transactions coming from the platform. That is representative of our existing estate of customers that are more and more accessing that. But additionally, new customers interested both in the platform and our next-generation solutions. And it’s not just on the software side, as I was walking in here this morning, I just talked to the new Head of North America, and he was talking about very, very large RFI or RFP that we just entered in the U.S. for a customer we have not had previously. And that’s around the services side. And again, I think maybe that’s a little bit underappreciated for the company is that services business here is a significant part of our differentiator in the marketplace. The combination of the two, I think sets us apart. So, my expectation is technology is always driving for greater efficiency from our customers, and the company has invested very heavily over the years to make sure that we have those products. I think we have been maybe a little late in getting some of them to market. But as Benny said, and Darren, there is a lot, and also in my comments, there is a lot of that’s coming to market this year that we can begin discussing with customers. So, we are modestly optimistic about the prospect of overachieving just given what we have seen in the early days of this year.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Yes.

The next question is from Dan Perlin from RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning. Jim, I appreciate all the comments you opened up with in your prepared remarks. My question is now that you are back in the CEO seat and given kind of the change of management here, what are you hoping to accelerate, or is there strategic priorities that had to change as a result, like the immediacy with which the switch occurred suggests that you guys got to accelerate something. So, I would just love to hear your thoughts there.

Well, thank you, Dan. It has been a long time. I think the last time you and I talked. I think we were sitting in Vegas at some ETA show or something.

Right…

Actually, it’s actually a sad story because when I left there, my general counsel was looking at me, like, what are you going to say. But when I left there, I had a kidney stone, which I had no idea what a kidney stone was. And I would highly recommend everybody to drink a lot of water because kidney stones are incredibly painful. Anyway…

I will take that under advisement. I appreciate.

There you go. You didn’t ask that question, but it brought back a very bad memory, even though our conversation was very pleasant. The kidney stone was not. Anyway, so I think circling on not just because I am here and Darren on the payment side. We have added a number of payments people. The alignment of payments and software, as I said earlier, has been ongoing for many years. It was a big thrust for us at EVO I think it’s something, like I said, Mike made an early investment to bring payments in and it’s been impactful to our restaurant business. It’s just unfortunate that the product set at JPay [ph], which is not broad enough in the effort to try to get it to there was just probably more than they wanted to invest. So, I think with Worldpay, that is a big opportunity. Charles, Adam and the team there have been great to work with, and we are looking forward to a very strong partnership going forward. And I think on our retail side, I think that will take some of the pressure off the top line as we implement across the U.S. And then as we said, in these other markets, I think the other piece is, historically, the company, it was a very large $8 billion company, as you know, with lots of different components to it, now the big ATM business that is separated. I think there was a very big focus on servicing the base, probably less than focusing on the new customers. There is somewhat of a finite number of large enterprise organizations, but we clearly do not have all of them or nearly close to that. So, the message at the sales kickoff, which took place in January was about…

Excellent. Just a quick follow-up on the payment component there for a moment, understanding that on the enterprise side, obviously that’s being handled – had been handled previously by other processors and maybe we will pay on some of them on the restaurant side. But the question is – I just want to make sure we are clear. The revenues that were being generated in payments in and around the enterprise side of that equation. Clearly, you didn’t have a rev share agreement with the prior process or you did, I am just trying to make sure I understand the totality of it.

No. Previously, I don’t know remember what year it was, maybe ‘19 or so. JetPay was acquired. So, that was a public company. They acquired the entirety of it. So, there wasn’t a rev share. There was traditional kind of ISO structure that was now owned by the company. So, they were in the payments business. That was divested in, I think ‘23. But all that was divested were those accounts that were not software customers of NCR Voyix. So, the customers that were pre-existing JetPay customers, those were sold together with the authorization platform, the rest of the infrastructure of the payment space stayed with the company. And so we have continued to be in payments. It’s just we are utilizing what used to be ours, but a third-party platform now because it was sold to a third-party, and there was no rev share with someone else. We don’t now have a rev share structure in the new agreement. It is a fee for service basis that you would expect. And Dan, it’s limited only to an authorization system. So, the rest of the infrastructure the company kept. And so we have the leverage that you would expect in payments, fixed cost, low variable cost, high fixed costs. So, we have all the fixed cost. So, the more transactions we put over that fixed cost is just incremental margin to the company.

Perfect. That’s great. Thank you so much for that clarity.

Thank you.

The next question is from Matt Summerville from D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead.

A couple of questions, first, I want to make sure I am clear on the ODM. A few months ago, the power stream was basically like, alright, everyone adjusts their models, you need to put in kind of this net $100 million sort of number for hardware. We are going to have the cutover done by the end of the year. So, now where the cutover is going to take the majority, it sounds like of this year and now models need readjusted again. So, help me understand what events kind of took place or what maybe was misunderstood initially about this transition? And then I have a follow-up.

Okay. So, it wasn’t directly to me, but I was here as the Executive Chair at the time. So, obviously two big projects going on the sale of the digital banking business, the $2.5 billion for that business, and at the same time, ODM. And yes, you are absolutely right. The expectations I wasn’t on the call, but I am assuming that the expectations, as you just described, were set that we would get this done by the end of the year. And to some extent, a big part of that was done, the European and Asia Pacific market minus Japan was ready for – it was fit for service. And there was a discussion internally about going ahead and launching half of it. I was uncomfortable with that in my previous position that I believe and still know that this needed to be all or nothing because the last thing we need to do is create questions or concerns with our customers, and that’s our primary interest is to make sure that this is completely transparent to them. The challenge turned out that – I mean not to get in over the weeds, but the provider system as an SAP system, our system is an Oracle system. And the largest U.S. based warehouse distribution center, which is I think in Nashville, their SAP system was not able to in sufficient time to be able to manage the complexities around servicing our customers out of the Nashville facility. And so they have pulled back. They are now using a third-party package that I believe they have already acquired, I met with them a couple of weeks ago, and that’s being implemented. So, we could have gone halfway, but it would just more confusion, obviously, to you guys to kind of…

That’s very helpful color. Just as a follow-up, I wanted to touch on the overall retail market and environment. Specifically, we are hearing here in North America, one of the, if not the largest storefront retailer is completely dis-intermediating the front end and looking to unbundle to the extent that they can. They are bringing point-of-sale software in-house, which is sort of kind of an unheard of move at least historically for this particular retailer. And I guess I am wondering if some of that type of behavior has become increasingly disruptive to sales cycles disruptive to the business. Just to the extent you can give a little color and insight into this sort of disintermediation and unbundling, whether this is becoming a broader trend? Thank you.

Unfortunately, and Darren can add to this. Matt, I don’t have a tremendous amount of experience watching this movie, but I have heard the stories from David and others here. I think as companies get larger, they feel as though that it’s worthwhile to have it their way. And I think some have done it maybe some have done it successfully. But at the same time, they are not necessarily experts in this space. They do something else. This is just tangential to what they do, and they think this is – and obviously, I think it’s representative of something that I have seen here. And as I mentioned in my comments, attrition rate at 2% retention at 98%. It’s hard to do what we do. It’s extremely hard. And we are investing hundreds of millions every single year, either in OpEx or CapEx to build and support, build new systems and support systems, the life cycle of technology changes constantly. So, for the situation that you described, I don’t know who you are talking about directly. I mean that can clearly be the case. And there are examples of it. But I think there is also examples of those who have done it that reach out to companies like us and we have had that happen more recently and need the expertise that we provide. When we have 13,000 people, we have 4,000 people that just work in engineering alone plus the product team. These are highly skilled professionals who understand the complexities of making what seems to us as consumers super easy at the point of sale, how hard it is to actually pull it off. So, yes, that could be the case. I don’t have anything as we sit here today, I don’t have any indication that any of our large accounts, actually some of the biggest ones, I am heading to the UK next month. Next month, in a couple of weeks, I guess next week to talk to one of our large European accounts that is relying heavily on us to deliver their next-gen solution to their stores and to their company. And one of the things that Darren can amplify this, that we heard from them is how important point-of-sale is to their overall solution. So, I – yes, it could happen. Do I think it’s a trend, I would be suspect that will be a trend. But I am also new with this. I will let Darren see if he wants to add to it.

Thanks Jim. I think the reality is it is a trend that’s been in the last decade, and you can repeat that in acquiring where retailers have wanted to self acquire, self-process, self-serve. And they – as many as have done it, and that’s a very limited number, as many then have actually reversed and pulled back out because they realize it is, as Jim said, it’s extremely costly. It’s extremely investment heavy. But there are extremely large national or multinational retailers that will want to go down some form of that path. I think as we signposted kind of the next-gen software and the services agenda are some real strength points for us. So, actually many retailers are outsourcing their entire help desk infrastructure to support if they are changing a hardware or a software environment. Equally, our software solution, we have a unique product called Edge and about 40% of our workflows through Edge are actually enabling third-party applications. So, many retailers are looking, as I said, about shrink solutions, so using camera systems to capture inadvertent or deliberate fraud. Some retailers are wanting it – looking at biometric payment type solutions, be that fingerprint, face, etcetera. To do that kind of stuff in-house is pretty expensive and challenging. And as enabling that, even if they take some partial debt, our platform and our Edge solution will be unique to support them whatever journey they take. But we will see that trend in terms of limited cases, but I don’t think it’s a material trend that we need to be seeing.

Yes. Just two other points. The platform that you hear a lot about from – you have heard in the last – I don’t know how many calls going back, but I think that is also a very differentiated solution where you can add functionality and applications to that platform for specific customers as opposed to maybe the legacy way, which we still have many customers, which was bespoke development on-site that only works specifically with your application because it’s so customized. Moving to a – trying to get new features added to it becomes increasingly complex. So, without pursuing a similar cloud solution as we have now for our next generation, I think a customer who – or a retailer who builds it bespoke to them. I think we will be, as Darren was just saying, we will be disappointed because technology is constantly changing. So, you need to have the flexibility to embrace the newer technology that comes to market.

Understood. Thank you, guys for the color.

Thank you.

The next question is from Parker Lane from Stifel. Please go ahead.

Yes. Good morning. Thanks for taking the question here. Jim, you have had a target out there under prior leadership of about 40% of the installed base on platform by ‘27. I was wondering, with you stepping into the role, what’s your updated view is on the achievability of that target, and if there is any initiatives that you are looking to put in place here to meet or exceed the pace of that target of getting 40% on platform?

Yes. When they offered me the position it’s only about a 40% target. I don’t want to make a – I don’t want to say yes or no to that. It’s not something that I have heard of previously. I think the pace of which we are growing at 26% on the platform. I think in the context of 40% of our customer base onto the platform is that reasonable in another 2 years or 3 years, yes. And I think it seems to me to be reasonable. I think as I have said earlier, there is the entire focus now. It’s – my history has been about buying companies, both at EVO and global, that’s not the model here. The model is executing on investments that have been made here over many years. And I think those investments have been the right investments. So, now it’s really about executing. And that’s a challenge that we will have. And so I don’t see that as out of line for expectation setting.

Understood. Appreciate it. Thanks.

Thank you.

The next question is from Erik Woodring from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks guys for taking my questions. First one, Jim, I am not sure if I missed it at the very top of the call, but obviously, this market remains very dynamic, let’s call it, geopolitically. And just – can you just maybe help us understand I realize most of this business is shifting to software and services. Just with the ODM kind of transition delay, how do we think around the risk of tariffs there? Just any framework that you can help us provide if there is a risk at all, or how to think about that and then I just have a quick follow-up. Thank you.

Yes, I was watching TV when I got home last night after a late dinner and it sounds like they are stretching out again into April. Is that what I heard him say on TV.

You just said today just a couple of minutes ago, Mexico, Canada tariffs start March 4th, China, additional 10% on March 4th. So, this was like a few minutes ago, which is the only reason I asked.

Well, I don’t have a TV on it here. So, I didn’t see that. Look, if – as Brian, I think said in his comments, we have the ability to in our contracts. I haven’t looked at every single one of them, but generally speaking, to be able to pass those on. I mean that’s not good news for the customers because I think the customers will feel the same way. And hardware is a very low margin business for us. So, I don’t think we want to be in the business of absorbing a 25% tariff. I don’t want to speak about politics associated with tariffs or anything of that nature. I think we will – if it happens, then we will address it, and we will update either guidance or otherwise. But for right now, we are taking the position that wait and see more than taking – changing guidance as a result of a comment that made – what sounds like it was made this morning. Like I said last night, it sounded like it was April. So, I figured – we had to mount those obviously [ph]. This is a new administration, so we will see what happens.

Totally understand. I just wanted to get the latest, completely understand. I appreciate that perspective. And then maybe, Brian, can you maybe just better help us understand longer term, I am just looking – thinking directionally about the kind of path of monetization. When we think about the relative growth in ARR and platform sites, increasing mid to high-single digits in ‘25, but software and services up low-single digits when you adjust for kind of the one-timers and the licenses, when should we just kind of expect maybe those growth rates to converge a little bit more? Is it really just about layering on all these subscriptions to get to that point, or is there anything else that’s kind of holding back kind of the actual reported revenue relative to some of the greater success you are having in the growth of, again, ARR and platform sites? Thanks so much.

I will take a piece of that and then Brian can add. Recognize that we have 8,000 people, not all of them in the field. We have 8,000 people. A lot of them are billing time and services to that. So, that’s a model that we are addressing. Part of that is subscription, but there is other aspects to it. If you look at just the pure software side, the revenue coming from software, that is growing fast – much, much faster. The issue really relates to how we address our service business in terms of how we are compensated for the commitment and effort that we make to service our customers on site. That has more of an impact than the software aspect. I don’t know if you want to add?

I would just say the positive is when the ODM agreement goes live, will be 80% recurring. We expect that recurring to grow 4% to 5% this year. We talked about payments today continuing with our platform, our NexGen products. So, there is a lot of things that help us going forward is that non-recurring becomes smaller.

And again, on the payments side, not because I came from payments, but payments and software have outlined for a number of years, as they are repeating again. And so I would expect you will see another significant driver of revenue, similar to others in our industry that will help accelerate ARR and just the overall growth. These are multiyear contracts that you enter into in the payment space.

And Jim, maybe if I could just follow-up on that very quickly, was the point you were making at the top of the Q&A when you were talking about having close to $700 million with $150 billion in volume. What you are trying to do is kind of compare it to the fact that earlier in the call, you were talking about 2024, your customers here at NCR Voyix processing $500 billion of POS. Is that kind of how we should be? Again, not saying, that’s how we should think about revenue, but that’s kind of the relationship that we should be thinking about here?

Yes. Don’t think about it as $500 billion of revenue, but then five clearly, global payments and the rest of them would be very happy if they could be at that rate. The idea is, these are large much thinner margins than what I would have seen at global. We had more of a mix or at EVO, we had more of a mix of large customers and small, but it was probably more oriented to the smaller merchants, larger margins. But the idea is $500 billion is a big number, 12 billion transactions a year is a big number. And those are largely untapped and where our restaurant business that was put into place, again, with the JetPay story, I think today, we are almost – we are at 100%. So, every time we sign a new customer, we have payments attached to it, unfortunately, because there were not capabilities within that application or that platform, we couldn’t do the same on the retail side. So, now because Worldpay is a leader in that space, and they have all those capabilities, we can now take advantage of. Now, there is going to be a price that we have to pay for the access to their system. But we have worked out, I think an economic deal that will allow us to offer value to our customers, so that when we sign up retailer XYZ, whether it’s a restaurant or fuel, we are not only offering them the software, the services, but now we can offer them payments, and they have asked for payments. We just have not had the capability of doing it. And the $500 billion is just the U.S. that number is double that when you look at the entire footprint. But that’s going to take even longer. The U.S. will be in business as early as the spring for new customers, and we will get the base converted over, my expectation is by the end of the summer. And then at that point in time or even earlier, we hope to talk about other markets that we are starting to open up again to payments not to replace what we do for a living. But to complement it, it’s a better experience for the customer. The one throat to choke, so to speak. They don’t have to have two different players involved as long as we can be economically viable, then I think we can sell to the base effectively as well as sell to new customers.

Nice performance and thank you for that color guys. Good luck.

Alright. Thank you.

There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back over to Jim Kelly for closing comments.

Thank you, operator, and thank you all for joining us and for your continued interest in NCR Voyix. Have a good day.

This concludes today’s teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.