Yaki Faitelson
Analyst · RBC Capital Markets
Thanks, Jamie. Good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for joining us to discuss another strong quarter, as we continue building on the momentum from Q1 and the end of 2020. With the backdrop of the current environment, I want to focus today on two topics: First, why data protection is such a hard problem for organizations to solve, that is only becoming harder with the digital transformation; and second, why our platform and technology offer a durable competitive advantage. I will then turn the call to Guy to discuss our Q2 results and guidance. Let’s start with the threat landscape. Simply put, companies of all sizes and industries are facing high-profile attacks on a daily basis. This is not surprising, as organizations put sensitive data in more places, and access it in more ways, making it harder to lock down data and detect threats. Hackers are taking advantage of this new environment, and with the rise of cryptocurrency, the theft of data has never been easier to monetize. Companies also face growing risks from rogue insiders and ransomware, given that the average employee has access to 17 million files on their very first day of employment, most of which aren’t relevant for them. As we have been saying for many years, security of the perimeter and endpoint is critical but insufficient. Perimeters are hard to define, and even harder to monitor. Endpoints are interchangeable. In reality, most data is moving to centralized, sanctioned repositories, and as cybersecurity risks surge, companies are thinking more strategically about data protection, and are increasingly turning to Varonis to help protect data where it lives. Data protection is an immensely difficult problem to solve, and in conversations with our customers and prospects, we ask three simple questions: One, do you know where your important data is stored? Two, do you know that only the right people have access to it? And three, do you know that they are using it correctly? To keep data safe, you have to be able to answer yes to all of these questions, but most organizations that turn to us can’t answer yes to any of them. Let me drill into this a bit more. First, identifying important data takes sophistication, given the complexities of data storage. Second, to understand accessibility, most companies don’t realize just how many millions of folders, files, records and groups need to be analyzed to discern permissions, and how many functional relationships there are between them. And lastly, in terms of data usage, every system is different, many lack fidelity or granularity, and all lack important context. Without the significant enrichment that we offer, companies can’t build a baseline of normal user behavior. Furthermore, when we show our customers that by integrating data importance, access and usage, they can finally understand and safely reduce risk in a holistic way that can’t be achieved with only one of these dimensions, the uniqueness of our solution becomes clear. For data to be secure, you need to be able to answer yes to all three questions, all the time. This is why our platform and underlying technology provide such a durable competitive advantage, and why we believe we have a 15-year head start. Data has always been our primary focus, and we start by building context around it where it’s stored, what it contains, who can access it, and from where. Automation and machine learning connect these dots to build visualizations of risk and profiles of normal usage. When we show companies how our platform provides best-in-class threat detection while automatically fixing the damage that a single compromised user or system can do, what we refer to as “reducing the blast radius”, we become a top priority. Our subscription offering, which aligns perfectly with customer demand for our platform, is why we say that “more is more” at Varonis. Customers buy a larger number of licenses upfront than under the perpetual model, realize greater automated value, and in turn not only renew but expand their deployments. Let me provide a few examples of some key customer wins from this quarter. One of the country’s largest Fortune 500 insurance company and financial services provider became a Varonis customer in Q2. We were initially brought in after an internal audit uncovered the risk of fines for regulatory non-compliance, but our risk assessment also found 65% of their folders were open to all 40,000 employees, and 40% of their sensitive data was exposed. After proving that we could classify their sensitive data for multiple regulations and remediate open access issues in three weeks, they purchased 10 licenses, and we are already discussing additional DatAdvantage licenses as well as Edge to further strengthen their deployment. At the same time, we remain underpenetrated with our existing customer base, and the team had another strong quarter closing substantial expansion opportunities. A great example of this is a North American healthcare company which was concerned with the potential leakage of patient data as they migrated to the cloud. While they have been long-time Varonis customers with a focus on protecting their on-prem data, in Q2 they purchased the entire Office 365 suite, Edge, and Automation Engine, doubling the number of licenses from 8 to 16. Building trust doesn’t happen overnight, and expansion examples like this one reflect the confidence we have instilled in our customers after helping solve their most urgent data protection problems over the last 15 years. In summary, we founded Varonis because we recognized that enterprise capacity to create and share data far exceeded its capacity to protect it. This has never been truer than it is today. Because we have aimed to keep pace with the relentless growth and complexity of data, we believe that our platform is uniquely positioned to address the data protection challenges facing all companies, providing Varonis an enormous opportunity to capitalize on the market opportunity we see, while deepening our competitive moat. With that, let me turn the call over to Guy. Guy?