Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Viper Energy Partners Fourth Quarter 2020 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Please be advised, that today's call is being recorded. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to hand the call over to Adam Lawlis, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Michelle. Good morning, and welcome to Viper Energy Partners' fourth quarter 2020 conference call. During our call today, we will reference an updated Investor Presentation, which can be found on Viper's website. Representing Viper today are Travis Stice, CEO; and Kaes Van't Hof, President. During this conference call, the participants may make certain forward-looking statements relating to the company's financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance, and businesses. We caution you that actual results could differ materially from those that are indicated in these forward-looking statements, due to a variety of factors. Information concerning these factors can be found in the company's filings with the SEC. In addition, we will make reference to certain non-GAAP measures. The reconciliations with the appropriate GAAP measures can be found in our earnings release issued yesterday afternoon. I'll now turn the call over to Travis Stice.

Thank you, Adam. Welcome everyone and thank you for listening to Viper Energy Partners fourth quarter 2020 conference call. Viper's financial and operational performance rebounded strongly in the second half of last year, after surviving the unprecedented volatility experienced through most of 2020. Commodity prices have increased and associated activity on Viper's acreage has increased alongside the commodity. Even in a year where we experienced historically low commodity prices, Viper was able to generate almost $200 million in operating cash flow, which was almost entirely converted to free cash flow due to our business having zero capital requirements. This recovery again highlights both the advantaged nature of the relative business model as well as the benefit of Viper's symbiotic relationship with our parent company Diamondback. Looking at the fourth quarter specifically, Viper's 10% quarter-over-quarter increase in oil production was driven primarily by Viper having an interest in 21 of Diamondback's 35 completions with well performance exceeding internal expectations. Viper also benefited from third-party operated well performance and timing of wells being turned to production outperforming our prior conservative expectations, which had been lowered due to the uncertainty presented by the volatile oil prices experienced early last year. Viper was once again able to generate significant free cash flow both organically as well as inorganically through non-core asset sales, which accelerated in the fourth quarter. The truly unique nature of Viper's business model is highlighted by the fact that during the fourth quarter alone, we were able to declare a $0.14 distribution, repurchase over 2 million units, and repay over $40 million in debt. Over the past nine months, we have now reduced total debt by $110 million or roughly 16% over this period. Further, the units we have repurchased today represent 1.6% of total units previously outstanding. Looking ahead to…

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from Neal Dingmann with Truist Securities. Your line is open.

Good morning guys. I'm trying to figure out here with your guidance, maybe give me a little bit of help here. You mentioned that all the wells that are in processing 529 you put in there and then you talked about the 538 wells that are in-site. Just wondered, could you talk about kind of what's based in the guide? Is that just these wells or maybe the expectations for total wells around that?

Yes, Neal, good question. I think we're assuming somewhere in the range of 9 to 10 net Diamondback wells throughout the year. I think, while we had a lot of high interest Diamondback wells come on in Q3, and Q4, we're taking a bit of a pause there based on the schedule today. So that number will come down a little bit here in Q1, but to pick back-up in Q2 of 2021. And then we're assuming, kind of somewhere around one net well a quarter on the non-op. I think that probably is a little more back half weighted than the Diamondback plan. But I think we're pretty excited on the amount of net wells we're seeing on the non-op side start to get permanently drilled and eventually completed here as the commodities recovered.

Okay, no, that makes sense. I think it was maybe back weighted. And just one follow-up, should we think about kind of that 58% oil weighting and I think the NRI run was around 6%. Is that going to be somewhere in that ballpark sort of going forward?

I think the oil weighting at 60 is a fair assessment, Hof, on the plant operated 6% NRI.

Yes, that’s probably about right, 6% to 7%, we've kind of talked about it as percent exposure to the standalone Diamondback development plan, so probably 70% exposure so to that plan. And, that'll go down as future [ph] guide on our incorporated. But, yes, I think 6% to 7% average NRI throughout the year will be fair.

Our next question comes from Derrick Whitfield with Stifel. Your line is open.

Hi. I wanted to circle back to your comments on visibility at high-level, referencing your forward visibility slides on Pages 7 and 9. Could you comment on how we should think about Diamondback's contribution to Viper post the QEP and Guidon transactions? Would it be safe to assume the combined value of work-in-progress in line-of-sight wells would remain around that 10 to 11 net wells or in line with Q3 and Q4 levels?

Yes, I think that's right, Derrick. I mean I think and we'll get into this probably later in the call but we do have a lot of opportunities to increase mineral ownership under QEP and Guidon. We didn't own a lot of minerals under those two entities prior to announcing these two deals. But our team is doing some work in trying to get more exposure under the couple pads that we have visibility to that you might not have permits filed already to get a hop on a good deal there. So I don't think it changes the addition of QEP or Guidon changes the amount of net wells under Diamondback for year but certainly as the year progresses, I think there will be opportunity to increase that number with selective purchasing of minerals underneath the pro forma Diamondback development plan.

Okay. That was in fact, my follow-up with the pending successful closure of both of these transactions; could you perhaps put some parameters or speak to greater [ph] A&D opportunity that presents to Viper?

Yes, it’s pretty significant Derrick and people have been calling us, I think we've been still trying to work the pro forma development plan to make sure we're buying selectively. We also need to make sure we're managing our balance sheet appropriately. And I think the capital allocation decision for us is going to be, do we continue buying back shares or do we use some cash to buy minerals, or trade minerals or continue to sell non-op minerals like we did in the fourth quarter. I think that market continues to heal. And I think, if you think about Viper, we no longer need to be the biggest mineral company out there. We just need to be the best and to be the best means we have to have more visibility into the other side of our business card which we're trying to do here by buying more minerals under Diamondback.

Our next question comes from Gail Nicholson with Stephens. Your line is open.

Good morning. When looking at that $250 million of free cash flow generated at $55 oil. How do you bucket that in the standpoint of a cash distribution payment to shareholders versus debt reduction versus that continuing to buybacks and/or future M&A events?

Yes, Gail, I think we're pretty happy with the 50% of distributable cash flow going through investors in the form of the distribution right now. The board did have a very active discussion on the buyback, and we're very happy that the buyback has worked to-date. I think the buyback versus buying more minerals under Diamondback is really the fulcrum here because I think probably a quarter of our free cash flow still goes towards debt reduction. I think we want our revolver to be at or neutral as close to zero as possible by the end of this year. We're well on our way to doing that. So, we have visibility into a revolver at zero, our bonds are trading well. So I'm not concerned there. And more free cash flow, then the distribution percentage will probably likely increase over time.

Great. And then looking at the over $40 million in asset sales that were done this quarter, are those like smaller packages, was there a larger package? Can you just talk about kind of what that M&A space looks like on the divestiture side for you guys?

Yes. It's really four deals too small, two of decent size. Two of decent size were in the -- one was in the $12 million to $15 million range and one was close to $20 million. And those were all under third-parties not operated by Diamondback without true visibility, not a lot of permit, no existing production, some vertical production, but no meaningful production. So, we were happy to get that deal done. And I think it accelerated the deleveraging process, and also allowed us to buy back a lot of stock in December and January as the stock was weaker than it is today. And also, we ended the year at under three times leverage. So I think that was a testament to the team getting these deals done before the end of the year and not touching that that three times number that we don't want to go above.

Our next question comes from Pearce Hammond with Simmons Energy. Your line is open.

Yes, good morning, and thanks for taking my questions. So my first question, well first, just to say my congrats on the success of fortifying the balance sheet. Just curious, what leverage ratio are you targeting for the balance sheet? And when you reach that target, would you expect to increase the payout ratio? Or is the payout ratio a function of how much stock you expect to buy back?

Yes, good question, Pearce. I think it's more a gross debt reduction, I'd like to like I was saying earlier, like the revolver down to zero, think with the forward strip, where it is, the forward free cash flow outlook looks strong enough that we will be comfortably under two times cleaner by the end of the year. I think longer-term we prefer to be in the 1 to 1.5 times ratio, but also paying down gross debt. So, first step is under two. I think it's going to happen pretty quickly here with the strip where it is, but like just like Diamondback, I don't think that precludes us from continuing to increase the returns to shareholders in the form of the distribution.

Thank you, Kaes. And then as a follow-up to that, as the balance sheet is strengthened and as it continues to get better, would that mean the desire to hedge would be going down as well?

I think we've learned that maybe some small amount of hedging at Viper to protect the downside or protect a minimum distribution and a maximum leverage, it's probably going to be in the cards. I don't think it's going to be us hedging all of our production, but certainly protecting that downside and guaranteeing some returns to investors and simplifying this business is probably prudent over a longer period of time here.

Okay, thank you, Kaes. And as a comment, I'd love the prepared remarks where Travis said 2020 truly historic for all the wrong reasons well put.

Yes, thank you.

We're onto 2021.

There are no further questions. I'd like to turn the call back over to Travis Stice, CEO, for any closing remarks.

So before Travis speaks, there wasn't a question about the storm impact in Q1. I just want to give investors some guidelines around the year because obviously Guidon was taking down little bit of Viper, we're assuming four to five days of downtime on Diamondback operated properties, we're assuming five to seven days of downtime on non-op properties just to be conservative and then getting the production back. I point people to kind of look at Q1 as very similar to what we produced in Q2 of 2020. But then some pretty significant growth after that in Q2 through Q4 which kind of equals a similar oil production guide to where the Street was prior to the storm impact. So, while the storm impact is going to meaningful in Q1, we do expect a pretty quick rebound in Q2, and we saw some positive things early in Q1 prior to the storm. So Travis, I'll let you close.

I appreciate those comments, Kaes. Thank you again to everyone participating in today's call. If you got any questions, please contact us using the contact information provided.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude the program and you may all disconnect. Everyone have a great day.