Good morning and welcome to the Vornado Realty Trust Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. My name is Roger and I will be your operator for today’s call. This call is being recorded for replay purposes. [Operator Instructions] I will now turn the call over to Mr. Steve Borenstein, Executive Vice President and Corporate Counsel. Please go ahead.

Welcome to Vornado Realty Trust second quarter earnings call. Yesterday afternoon, we issued our second quarter earnings release and filed our quarterly report on Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents as well as our supplemental financial information packages are available on our website, www.vno.com under the Investor Relations section. In these documents and during today’s call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in our earnings release, Form 10-Q and financial supplement. Please be aware that statements made during this call maybe deemed forward-looking statements and actual results may differ materially from these statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. Please refer to our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 for more information regarding these risks and uncertainties. The call may include time-sensitive information that maybe accurate only as of today’s date. The company does not undertake a duty to update any forward-looking statements. On the call today from management for our opening comments are Steven Roth, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Michael Franco, President and Chief Financial Officer. Our senior team is also present and available for questions. I will now turn the call over to Steven Roth.

Thank you, Steve and good morning everyone. Our business is on plan and continuing to improve month by month. Our primary focus is always on leasing and I can report that PENN 2 is extremely active and further that in the overall portfolio more than two-thirds of the recent vacancies have already been spoken for. Our focus continues to be on enhancing our liquidity, reducing leverage, and of course, taking advantage of opportunities created by the current market dislocation. New York City is as crowded as ever and that’s a good thing. As I predicted over the past couple of years, working at the kitchen table wasn’t an existential threat. We now see building utilization percentages in the ‘70s and that’s just about normal. Tenants are expanding and growing and actively searching for space. We actually competed in a market of over 200 million square feet. And in many of the prime submarkets, good spaces being eaten up and rents are rising. It maybe that the most important dynamic in our market is that it is almost economically impossible to build new, thereby cutting off new supply. There hasn’t been a new office building of size started in New York in the last 5 years. If history is a guide, when supply shuts down, it quickly leads to a landlords market. As Michael will cover in a moment, we are off to a very strong start in our leasing for this year. The Bloomberg renewal and extension of the 947,000 square feet at 731 Lexington Avenue, creating 16 years of term is the highlight. And we have good activity at all of our assets. As I said, at PENN 2 with the lobbies, common spaces, amenities and plazas now complete, we are seeing a significant uptick in tenant activity and…

Thank you, Steve, and good morning, everyone. Our overall second quarter FFO was $0.76 per share. This excludes $0.19 of noncomparable items, mostly our share of the gain from the discounted debt extinguishment related to the refinancing of 280 Park Avenue in gains from additional 220 Central South unit sales. Second quarter comparable FFO as adjusted was $0.57 per share compared to $0.72 per share for last year’s second quarter. This decrease was attributable to the known items we previously discussed and consisted of 7% of lower NOI from known move-outs net of rent commencements, $0.07 of termination income in 2023 and from a former tenant at 345 Montgomery Street in San Francisco and $0.03 of higher net interest expense, partially offset by $0.02 of higher NOI from signage and the net impact of other items. We have provided a quarter-over-quarter bridge in our earnings release and in our financial supplement. On our last earnings call, we stated that we expect our 2024 comparable FFO to be down from 2023 comparable FFO and of $2.61 per share, primarily due to higher projected net interest expense of about $0.30 per share and the temporary impact of known vacancies at certain of our properties, primarily at 1290 Avenue of the Americas 770 Broadway and 280 Park Avenue of roughly $0.25 to $0.30 per share. This is still a good assumption as these items are expected to have a larger impact during the second half of the year. We already have commitments for about 2/3 of the aforementioned vacant space, assuming the 770 Broadway transaction is finalized, but the GAAP earnings from these leases won’t begin until the latter part of 2025. Thereafter, we expect earnings to increase as income and the lease up of PENN and other vacancies comes online and as…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Today’s first Question comes from Steve Sakwa with Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.

Yes. Thanks, good morning. Steve, you certainly piqued my interest with your 770 Broadway comments. I’m just not sure I fully understand I guess, kind of the transaction and discussion because I know that building is about 80% occupied today with a couple of different tenants. So I’m just not exactly sure if this new tenant sublease the space from the old tenant? Or just kind of how that – I guess, I didn’t really quite understand the whole transaction that’s pending.

Steve, I wish I could help you, but I’ve said all that I’m going to say on that topic. It’s an important transaction. We’re under a confidentiality agreement and so that’s how I’m going to say is that there’s an important protection and process. Sorry.

Okay. Maybe switching gears to the 2 PENN, and I guess, Michael, the pipeline you talked about sounds quite strong. Can you maybe just provide a little bit more color on the types of tenants that you’re speaking to? And are these tenants that are, I guess, currently already in the marketplace and more lease expiration-driven or are these kind of new requirements in the market looking at two PENN?

Hi, Steve, it’s Glenn. How are you? So it’s a mix of both tenants expiring soon and some tenants expiring in the outer years. But I’ll tell you at PENN 2, your tenants design for the same space right now, both in the podium and in the tower. We have technology interests, fashion interest, financial interest, legal into, academic interest, media, we have interest from all types of sectors on all the space. We’re in different sorts of paper negotiation with all these tenants. So we’re seeing very, very strong activity as we sit here. Similarly, in PENN 1, we’ve leased about 155,000 feet at PENN 1 this year. At rents that are well above where we thought we’d wind up there and the types of tenants keep coming in. We lease out right now with a major pharmaceutical company for two floors and we have other activity coming into PENN 1. And with that, we’re also seeing great activity around the district at PENN 1 and some of the other properties. So I would tell you we’re really [indiscernible] sellers now in PENN. When you walk the street, it’s really spectacular, everything is looking great. The reception is better, better and better as each pain passes. So we’re super excited about what’s to come.

Okay, thanks.

Thank you. Next question today comes from John Kim at BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Thank you. On the Uniqlo sale, can you just talk about the earnings impact? I think you saw that great price per square foot. But I think your preferred get redeemed, so might be slightly dilutive in the near-term. And also, you still own five assets on Fifth Avenue in that prime quarter between 51st and 55th Street. Is $20,000 per square foot the right way to value the remaining retail? And do you plan to monetize any further assets there?

Well, there’s a lot in that, John. But so I’ll try to remember your question. If I forget, remind me. But thank you. And I think you’ve been steadfast, but we were in a retail the whole time, which we appreciate. Look, it’s obviously a transaction we’re quite pleased now. We think it’s an outstanding execution. And I think if you look at the valuation and Steve talked about the cap rates and the value the income is actually up a little bit from 2019 transaction. That would effectively tell you that the retail value that we sold in 2019 is sort of back to those levels. So if you take the preferred and the – just where the value of the equity was marked at the time, that’s about $16 a share, which I don’t think our stock price continues to reflect at all. So eventually, people will appreciate the valuation of Fifth Avenue. But on the per square foot, $4,000 is that’s the entire space. I think the most important thing to focus on when you’re looking at Fifth Avenue retail is what’s the amount of frontage, what’s the amount of ground for square footage. And when you take out a small allocation for the second floor given the rents are obviously quite a bit less, it’s about $50,000 a square foot for grade square feet. So I think that’s a more representative metric for Fifth Avenue retail in terms of the grade screen. So, you have to sort of look asset-by-asset. But with every user sale, and we have now seen three major sales. And I think we alluded over the last couple of calls, we expected there would be some – obviously, we knew this is in the works, but I don’t think you have seen…

You covered it all. Thank you. And then my second question is on 10.2 and the timing of MSG moving into that space, as well as the capitalized interest. If you could just remind us of your capitalized interest policy, when do you start expensing to invest on that project?

Sure. John, it’s Tom. MSG, we actually delivered some of the space, a portion of that say, six months early. So, in our second quarter results, you are seeing the impact of that. It gets fully delivered by the fourth quarter. So, our fourth quarter will be a full quarter of MSG rent at the new rent. And then obviously ‘25, it will be a full year of MSG on the GAAP basis. As it relates to capitalized interest, as we indicated in Michael’s prepared remarks and on previous calls, capitalized interest will roll down in 2025. But most of that will be offset by additional GAAP revenue as it relates to some of the large leasing we did this past year with [indiscernible] and others.

And you do that floor-by-floor as it’s delivered or the entire building at once?

It’s going to be a portion of the building, because as we have some open development going on, some of that interest will continue to capitalize in 2025.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question today comes from Floris van Dijkum with Compass Point. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning guys. Thanks for taking my question. Obviously, very interesting and bullish news on Fifth Avenue, I also noticed that your rent spreads on your retail portfolio were positive by the tune of around 13%. Maybe if you could talk a little bit more about some of the upside potential, is that a – what you are seeing in terms of leasing activity? And also, obviously, now that UNIQLO owns its space, there is less space to lease in it, particularly in the Upper Fifth Avenue quarter. What are your expectations for market rental growth and lease spreads that in your portfolio over the next year or so?

Good morning Floris. On your first question, in terms of retail activity, I think we have talked about this on the last call, a couple of calls in terms of just the general market dynamics where the retailers are more active, and we are seeing continued recovery there, both in terms of rents improving and vacancy rates declining, and that certainly continues. I think if you look at our activity this quarter, it wasn’t very meaningful, but it tends to be a little lumpy. But as I look forward at our pipeline, it’s quite active. We probably have close to 160,000 feet in lease negotiations right now and probably another 150,000 feet of deals in various stages of letters of intent. So, a lot of activity, I would say that’s principally focused in PENN as well as in Times Square, where we have space that, obviously, we have redeveloped in PENN that we have delivered or delivering and then backfilling some of the spaces, particularly 1540 Broadway. So, that’s where the activity is. And I would say the rents are at pretty healthy levels relative to historical, particularly in Times Square. Fifth Avenue, we have one vacancy that comes up later this year. There is activity there. It’s hard to extrapolate exactly just because there is not a tremendous amount of vacancy and every space is so particular in terms of where users want to be and how much space they want and what not. But rents are – I think it recovered pretty significantly there. So, again, we see continued momentum. I think in terms of near-term, we don’t have a lot of role coming up on to Fifth near-term. So, I don’t know that really – the near-term is to mark that either way is really relevant. There is duration on most of those leases other than that one small lease that’s coming up at the end of the year.

Thanks Michael. And maybe my follow-up is if you could talk a little bit about your plans for the $450 million of unsecured debt that matures, I think in January of ‘25. You said you are in the market looking at some of those things. Is the idea to refinance that, or will you pay that off with cash, or if you can talk a little bit about your thinking about that?

Yes. Look, as we sit here today, our plan is to pay it off. And we have got significant cash on hand. Obviously, given the announcements in the last 24 hours, we have got more cash coming in. So, that’s the plan. Like as you would expect, we are tuned to the markets and what’s going on with rates trending down, with spreads tightening and we obviously look at the various financing markets to see where those are and that presents an alternative that’s compelling. And we are pleased with the direction of that. But as we sit here today, the plan is to pay it off.

Thanks Michael.

Yes.

Thank you. And our next question today comes from Camille Bonnel with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Glenn, I wanted to follow-up on the leasing side, given your comments around the improving outlook. Was the Handshake deal on 770 Broadway included in the pipeline from last quarter, or did it more recently emerge? And just outside of 770 Broadway discussions, I am curious to get your thoughts on what activity are you seeing specifically around the large office users?

Hi. The 770 transaction was included within Michael’s remarks, in terms of the pipeline. In terms of overall activity, we are really seeing activity throughout the portfolio really everywhere right now. If I look at the list of the action, the leases out and the proposals in, we are really seeing it very well spread out for all the buildings. And the one thing I would note is the bread-and-butter tenants, the 10,000 foot, 20,000 foot, 30,000 foot types are really coming into the market more so now than they have in a while. And we are seeing that a lot of the properties, particularly in PENN and in Midtown. And so I would tell you that the market is as well mixed as it’s been in a long time, different sized tenants, different genre of tenants. So, we are really seeing a very good consistent mix which is helping the market helping the volume. And as you can see in a lot of the reports, New York is clearly leading that charge by space throughout the country.

And for my follow-up, I was wondering if we can get your latest thoughts on how taxable income is trending just following the pickup in dispositions this year. Are we likely to see more distributions paid out, or is it still uncertain given the known move-outs? Thank you.

Still uncertain, Camille, as we get further on the year depending on what ultimately ends up closing, not closing, etcetera, then we will have a – we will have a better sense. We have a decent sense and they can go in a number of different directions still.

Thank you. And our next question today comes from Michael Griffin with Citi. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks. Wondering if you can give us a sense of how concessions have been trending. I noticed it was, I think notably lower this quarter probably driven by the Bloomberg expansion. But have you seen the concession environment improved at all, or is it pretty steady relative to recent quarters?

Hi Michael, it’s Glen. So, concessions have stabilized. They are stubbornly high, but they have stabilized. They have not gone up in some time. That’s now being somewhat offset by higher rents in certain properties and certain sub-districts in our portfolio. So, that – we are seeing positive signs in terms of net effective rents in some of our properties. So, look, the hope is as the market tightens into bringing the TIs and free rents down. But certainly, they have stabilized now for a bunch of quarters as we have been stating on these calls.

Thanks Glenn. Appreciate that. And then Steve, just on your kind of macro comments about the interest rate environment and the Fed’s kind of fight against inflation. Obviously, I think lower interest rates are better for office overall. But just given the chatter that we have heard recently around recessionary fears, I guess how do you balance the more favorable outlook for interest rates. Mixed with what could be a recessionary scenario that would probably negatively impact the office sector.

The biggest driver, I mean our biggest cost is the cost of capital. So, the real estate industry has very, very strong and increased in value as the interest rates are trending down. The expectations of most market buyers is that we are in the – we are on the other side of the interest rate cycle, and interest rates will be coming down. We are certainly not planning the business for interest rates to go down to the zero levels that they were, but hopefully they will stabilize as normalized level, and we will see how it works out.

Thanks. That’s it for me. Thanks for the time.

Thank you.

And the next question today comes from Dylan Burzinski with Green Street. Please go ahead.

Hi guys. Thanks for taking the question. Excuse me, I appreciate the comments on street retail activity taking up, but I guess as we look at the portfolio today, I think you ended the quarter call at high 70% occupancy, which is still well below where it was pre-COVID. I guess as you guys think about that business or I mean is there you guys envision that eventually getting back to where it was pre-COVID, or do you sort of envision an environment where things are improving?

Good morning. Look, I think the number you referenced on the occupancy, I think we got to put a big asterisk next to that, which is it’s really, that lower numbers driven by Manhattan Mall, right. So, JCPenney went bankrupt, vacated that store, and that caused about 10 points of occupancy decline there. Now, we have been given everything else we are doing in PENN, evaluating what to do with that space, not necessarily wanting to lock it up long-term. Certainly with the tenant that’s not paying the rent that we think is appropriate, and recognizing that, we are doing the district’s going to accrue to that asset over time. So, we have done a number of temp deals. In fact, we have one with Netflix that’s opening right now and that’s probably the plan. We don’t actually we do that. We don’t take that into occupancy. In fact, maybe just taking that service, because by and large, it’s really not a focus of us, to lease it long-term unless we get a robust rent. So, you can take the Manhattan Mall out that 77 you will goes to like 87 and we have got the other vacancy that we are working on. So, the answer is bottom one is, yes, we have got numbers going to get back up the levels we had historically. But keep in mind there is 10 points that sort of frictional vacancy or structural vacancy that is due Manhattan Mall.

Thank you. And the next question today comes from Connor Mitchell, Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

Hey. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. So, there has been a lot of talk about the High Street retail and how the whole environment is rebounding in terms of that area. We have seen it from rent coming back, retailers requiring spaces or leasing. But just thinking about one particular the –there has been articles in. I think it was June or July, about Sephora recently negotiating their rents down by two-thirds on Madison. So, I guess I just wonder if you guys can help us think about the juxtaposition between some of the metrics we see recently, your comments and then some specific transactions such as the Sephora one.

On this Sephora deal you mentioned at 520 Madison. I wouldn’t pull out a market transactions, was very short-term deal, a result for 1 year or 2 years with the most. So, I wouldn’t take into account as a list to the market of what’s going on in that carter.

Alright. I will add on to that, but I think we need to find High Street. I don’t know what I would characterize 520 Madison as High Street. It’s, yes, it’s Madison Avenue. That’s not the prime stretch of Madison Avenue. The prime stretch of Madison Avenue is 57th to probably 64th, which is where you see rents that are generally north of a $1000 a square foot. So, retail that is not prime, prime is, it’s coming out all the rents, that is not seen at same level of recovery is recovering, but it’s not seeing the same level of recovery as prime fit Prime Time Square, And you have got that prime stretch of Madison. So, both the short-term nature as well as and, we have always talked about this. The Prime High Street is really scarce and you have to focus on what that means, different than any other set of blocks in the city. And I think the beauty of our retailers it is all Prime High Street.

Alright. Very helpful. Appreciate the color. And then maybe just one more quick one. You said a lot of financing activity, activity in the quarter obviously. And then a fixed reach that, was refi that said a fixed rate of 7.50. Just curious if that’s a good rate that we should think about for some upcoming maturities such as 7.31 or any others moving forward?

That’s probably, as we sit here today, it’s probably 50 point – basis points higher would be if we did it today, just given this happened in 10-year or in the future, 5 years. So, obviously the base rate matters, spreads matters, etcetera. But, 7.31, I think you will see get done much tighter than that reflected in the long-term lease that we executed last quarter. And I think it’s had to depend. But I think in general, the markets continue to heal. I think you will see those rates trend down to some extent that just by the fact that base rates are down.

Thank you.

And our next question today comes from Ronald Kamdem with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Hello, Mr. Kamdem, your line is open for perhaps you are muted.

Yes. Can you hear me now?

Yes.

Okay. Great. Just two quick ones from me. Going back to the 2.6 million square feet pipeline, can you break out how much of that relates to PENN-2 and you the 24 that you mentioned on PENN-1, that’s out for lease, is that on vacant space?

The PENN 1 deal making is on vacant space. I really don’t want to get into much more detail than I have already on PENN 2, but a good amount of the pipeline is PENN 2 with the plethora of deals growing as we speak in different parts of negotiations, but rather, I’ll get into this very much detail as well at this point.

Sure. Thanks. And if I could just sneak in a quick one, can you sort of comment on any updated plans for the former Hotel Penn site given all the leasing activity you are seeing on PENN 1 and PENN 2?

It’s – look, I think we have talked about in the past, the cost of construction financing, lack of availability and that makes it difficult to build right now. So, look it’s a prime site, arguably the best site left in the city, but they have not come yet.

Thanks so much. That’s it for me.

Thank you. And our next question today comes from Caitlin Burrows at Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. Earlier you mentioned how the leases you were doing at 555 California all had positive mark-to-market. So I guess, could you talk about that a little bit more? How long do you think those positive spreads at 555 can last for? And I guess given the occupancy there, how would you characterize market rents there? Like do you have the ability to push more or to what extent does vacancy in the market or submarket limit the pricing side?

I think what we are seeing in 555 is that it is the best building in San Francisco. Our tenants have all remained are ones have held very strong. So, this building is very inflated from the overall market and what you are seeing statistically in the city. Without getting into much detail on the negotiations that are going on with our tenants, we are seeing a lot of strength. We are even seeing growth in the deals expansion with these tenants. So, what’s going to happen in the future in terms of these rents? I mean, look, the rents at our building has historically kept going up. We feel very good about the rental rates we are achieving right now. We are ahead of the market. We expect to continue to be ahead of the market as we move on.

Okay, got it. And then back in the prepared remarks, you gave some color on the outlook to ‘25, I think suggesting that with the leasing that’s been completed and PENN 2 coming online that late ‘25 could see maybe an improvement in earnings. I guess first is that the right take away, but then be when you think about all of the moving parts, are there additional 2025 large lease expirations we should be aware of and do you have any insight into those tenants thoughts at this point?

We have a modest expiration schedule in ‘25. We are obviously speaking to all the tenants expiring during that period. But I think you know generally speaking between 280 770 and 1290, we’ve seen the real positive exploration now and as we go to ‘25 and forward, we are seeing the coming of those big explorations.

Okay. Thanks.

Thank you. And our next question today comes from Anthony Paolone with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Yes, thanks. [Technical Difficulty]

Pardon the interruption here. Mr. Paolone, your line is coming in very poorly. I am going to disconnect your line. I am going to move on, you can dial back in and we can get you right back into the queue. Our next question today comes from Nick Yulico with Scotiabank. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Yes, I know you talked about some of the leasing underway already for this year. I guess, can you give us a feel for how occupancy might trend for the back half of the year in the office portfolio?

Yes. We are about 893 today. We know that’s going to trend down a bit next quarter, so just given that Meadows vacated 275,000 square feet at 770 Broadway. Obviously if we complete the 770 deal with [indiscernible] that’s going to have a significant positive impact. But in terms of near-term, certainly going to go on next quarter, we have a bunch of things in the queue. I think we end up the year basically where we are at now, could be 20, 30 basis points lower, higher share. I mean it all depends on timing, right. But I think just in terms of where we end this year, I think that’s a decent number and there is some things in the work that could take that number up couple of 100 basis points. But again, it’s all fine. But I think just in terms of near-term next quarter or two, hopefully that gives you what you wanted.

Yes, that’s helpful. Thanks. And then just going back to PENN 2, can you give us a feel for maybe types of tenants looking at the space and from the standpoint of is it tenants that would be new to that market? Anything else you could just talk about whether these are lease expiration-driven where you are trying to sort of capture some market share there?

It’s Glen. So as I said earlier, a very, very good mix of all different industry sector type tenants, technology, fashion legal, media, academia, it’s a very good mix. And yes, there are new entrants to the district. And really, that’s all due to the really great product that we’re now delivering and even more so, the new streetscape, all the new reads that we’ve embedded on the street. So it’s all positive in terms of new entrants, new types of sectors, etcetera, that’s really the mix of the action.

I think, one thing I would just add, Nick. I think, we talked about [indiscernible] the access the trend that which we set on top of is just critical, right. And we are the most connected submarket, and when you look at some of the tenants and where they are attracting their employees from, that access is just critically important. So, it’s obviously it’s what PENN been full historically, but now, and I know whether you’ve been over to the district and seen it done, I really encourage everybody to do so, but it’s while, and when you combine that with the transit, I think it’s now. I think it’s why you hear the excitement Glenn’s voice, and it’s why the pipeline’s built so significantly.

Thanks.

Thank you. And our next question today is a follow-up from John Kim of BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Thank you. I just wanted to get back to 770 Broadway, I understand you’re under a confidentiality agreement. But just to help us understand the market dynamics and demand a little bit better. Can you share what industry the tenant or users in, whether or not it’s a tech user and if this includes expansionary space in Manhattan.

I’m very sorry, but we can’t say anything more than we’ve already said.

Okay. But it is a lease, right, not at a sale?

I’d reiterate what stated...

I think, I’ve said – that’s all we’re going to say, and I’ll say that again. Thank you. Sorry.

It gives you a reason to tune for the next couple of calls, John.

Thank you. And our next question today comes from Dylan Burzinski with Green Street. Please go ahead.

Steve, I think in your prepared remarks, you mentioned potential or potential transactions to repatriate more portions of the preferred equity in the Time Square joint venture. Are you able to share any details as to what this is. Is this potential sales, other recapitalizations?

Both of those are in play. So the answer is, first of all, that we’ll end up with about $1.5 billion of preferred after the Uniqlo sale completes are – is a – first of all, the instrument is dollar good, supported by a very valuable collateral. Secondly, that it is a source of liquidity for us either through sales or refinancing, both of which we are in the process of working on for portions of that $1.5 billion.

And then I don’t think you guys touched on this yet, but curious appetite for share repurchases given where the shares are today.

What was the question?

Share repurchases.

I was very excited in the teams there is incredible value still. But in the source with respect of our capital allocation at the price of the shares today, that’s not our primary objective. We have sped handle, we have other capital allocation priorities. So right as of right now, the program is dormant.

Thank you. And our next question today comes from Brendan Lynch with Barclays. Please go ahead.

Great. Thank you for taking my question. If I recall correctly, a few quarters ago, you engaged an expanded group of brokers to pull in demand to the PENN District from other markets around the country. Can you discuss how that initiative is contributing to leasing year-to-date and how it’s impacting the pipeline now?

We brought in Cushman & Wakefield at the beginning of this year. They’ve been a very good add to our team. It certainly is strengthen our outreach across the country is used to get and in the city. So we’ve been very pleased with them and their additive performance to our crew.

Great. Thank you. That was my only question.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Steve Sakwa with Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.

Yes. Thanks. Just one follow-up. I think last quarter, you guys had talked about earnings probably bottoming in ‘24 and then moving higher in ‘25. I know there’s a lot of moving pieces and interest rates will play a big factor. Is that still the case? Or is it possible that maybe with timing of lease 2 PENN in capitalization burning off that earnings could still be down next year with more of an inflection point late in ‘25 into ‘26.

Steve, it’s – honestly, it’s early to give you much visibility there. I mean I think our comments still hold. But as you can tell from unit quote things, there’s a lot of moving pieces going on right now. And that’s – and those are the only things we’ve talked about. So I just think it’s too preliminary to give you that view because based on some of those things, it may impact whatever I tell you now. So I think that’s a good working assumption, and we just have to wait as we get closer towards the end of the year.

Thank you. And this concludes our question-and-answer session. I’d like to turn the call back over to Steven Roth for closing remarks.

Thank you all for participating. I think you could tell from the call, the questions and the numbers that we published a large emphasis on leasing, leasing is very, very, very healthy in New York. And we feel that we’re on the foothills of a very, very good market, and we’re very excited. The PENN project, especially is number one on our hit parade. And if you all haven’t been down there recently, you should go down, take a walk around what’s going on, what we’ve done. And that will give you a reason for why tenant activity is excreting geometrically. Thanks very much.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines, and have a wonderful day.