Welcome to the Q3 2015 Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. Earnings Conference Call. My name is Anna, and I will be your operator for today's call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Jim Kelly, Vanda’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Kelly, you may begin.

All right. Thank you, Anna. Good afternoon and thank you for joining us to discuss Vanda Pharmaceuticals' third quarter 2015 performance. Our third quarter 2015 results were released this afternoon and are available on the SEC EDGAR system and on our website, www.vandapharma.com. In addition, we’re providing live and archived versions of this conference call on our website. Joining me on today’s call is Dr. Mihael Polymeropoulos, our President and CEO and Tom Kibbs, our SVP and Chief Commercial Officer. Following my introductory remarks, Dr. Polymeropoulos will update you on our ongoing activities. Then I will comment on our financial results for the third quarter of 2015 before opening the lines for your questions. Before we proceed, I’d like to remind everyone that various statements that we make on this call will be forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. Our forward-looking statements are based upon current expectations that involve risks, changes in circumstances, assumptions and uncertainties. These risks are described in the risk factors and MD&A and results of operations sections of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and on our subsequently filed quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, which are available on the SEC EDGAR system and on our website. We encourage all investors to read these reports and our other SEC filings. The information we provide on this call is provided only as of today and we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements we may make on this call on account of new information, future events or otherwise except as required by law. With that said, I would like to now turn the call over to our CEO, Dr. Mihael Polymeropoulos.

Thank you, Jim and good afternoon everyone. The third quarter was another strong revenue quarter for Vanda, putting us on track for greater than $100 million revenue for the year, a significant milestone in the history of our company. HETLIOZ revenue grew by 17% from the prior quarter to $11.7 million. We continued to see a steady addition of new prescriptions month after month and a steady rate of prescription refills over time. The response to our awareness campaign continues to be strong and unsaturated, suggesting [ph] potential for significant growth of the Non-24 franchise. In addition to the DTC campaign, we continued our ground effort with educational facilities for blind, fairly creating awareness and adding to our growing database of opt-ins. We believe that the fundamentals of our HETLIOZ business are strong and have reaffirmed now our revenue guidance for 2015, which includes a $40 million to $45 million in revenue from HETLIOZ and we look forward to further growth next year. In the European Union, Gian Piero Reverberi has joined Vanda as GM Vanda Europe, and we’re currently focusing our efforts on pricing reimbursement activities in key countries such as Germany while we are refining our EU launch plan for 2016. Fanapt was again a significant revenue contributor for Q3 with $16.7 million. This revenue however represents a 5% sequential decline consistent with a similar decline in underlying demand. We are seeking to stabilize the Fanapt revenue with active commercial efforts. Specifically, in early August, we launched a 12 person team in parallel territories around the United States. Early analysis of the data suggests that in this 12 territories, Fanapt revenue is beginning to stabilize. We are now in the process of further building out a small Fanapt dedicated salesforce for a total of 50 territories around the…

Thank you, Mihael. You will see in our press release that Vanda is offering non-GAAP financial information. We do so because we believe that non-GAAP information can enhance an overall understanding of our financial performance when considered together with GAAP figures. On a GAAP basis, for the third quarter of 2015, Vanda recorded a net loss of $9.5 million or $0.22 per share as compared to a net loss of $1.4 million or $0.04 a share for the third quarter of 2014. On a non-GAAP basis, for the third quarter of 2015, Vanda recorded a non-GAAP net loss of $4.5 million or $0.11 a share as compared to a non-GAAP net loss of $7.2 million or $0.21 a share for the third quarter of 2014. Total net product sales for the third quarter of 2015, increased by 3% over the prior quarter to $28.3 million. On a non-GAAP basis for the third quarter of 2015 non-GAAP total revenues, which excludes non-cash Fanapt licensing in prior periods grew by $21.3 million, over 300% to $28.3 million as compared to $7 million for the third quarter of 2014. This is the result of significant growth in the year-to-date sales of HETLIOZ in the US and the acquisition of the Fanapt product rights at the end of 2014. HETLIOZ net product sales grew to $11.7 million in the third quarter of 2015, a 17% increase compared to $10 million in the second quarter of 2015. As of September 30, 2015, the specialty pharmacy channel held less than two weeks of inventory as calculated based on trailing demand. Although there was some destocking in the period as compared to inventory levels at the end of the second quarter. Fanapt net product sales $16.7 million in the third quarter of 2015, reflect a 5% decline…

Thank you, Jim. At this time, we'll be happy to answer any questions you may have.

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And we have a question from Jason Butler from JMP securities. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks for taking the questions. I guess I just want to start on the pipeline. Could you give us some more color about the Smith-Magenis development plans please?

Yes, thank you, Jason. The Smith-Magenis study that has just begun is an interventional study that will be pivotal that is a Phase III type study. I cannot yet discuss all the details of the design, but the expectation is that the results of this study will be sufficient for NDA filing. Given the rarity of the disorder, it’s hard at this time to predict exactly the length of the study and whether we should expect results, but we should be able in the future to give better guidance on that. But the expectation would be a positive study to be sufficient for filing the SNDA and pursuing that indication.

Okay, great. And then I guess just a follow-up, do you have agreement with FDA on the trial design and the endpoints that you will be pursuing for approval?

No, we do not. And in fact, part of this pivotal study is a program to understand better magnitude of the effect and appropriate clinical parameters. As you know, no one has developed a drug for SMS yet and there is a very little understanding what are the key clinical outcomes that one can affect. We have done an observational study this year where we have better defined the sleep-wake cycle of normality, not just the inversion of the circadian rhythm, but also quantify the sleep defect. So we plan to use the early screen data of that study and interventional portion of the study at grounds discuss with the FDA the appropriateness of endpoints of the actual Phase III protocol. And a similar path will be taken in Europe, where we are pursuing also an orphan designation, but again in Europe, we require that you have some experience with the drug in some patients before that application is done.

Okay, great. And then just a last question from me on the HETLIOZ commercial progress. I'm just trying to put into context the guidance you gave today versus the ongoing data you are seeing in terms of patient growth as well as the price increases you’ve taken for the product. Can you just help us understand a little bit more about how we should think about patient growth and I guess the simple question is given the patient growth you’re seeing and the price increases you’ve taken, I feel like I'm coming to a number that's above your current guidance range?

Well, thanks for the question. We cannot give 2016 guidance, we’re reaffirming the 40 million to 45 million. I think we are going to be in that range for the year. But to help you model better and answer the question, year-to-date, the majority of the significant revenue growth that we have seen, the majority of this growth comes from new patient growth and the rest of it is price. And when I said earlier that we believe the fundamentals of the HETLIOZ business are strong, we directly mean the expectation that new patient growth that we've seen will continue in the foreseeable future. So that is why we’re optimistic about growth of the HETLIOZ franchise, because the fundamental of growing the patient base exists and we believe that the dynamics are there to continue in the foreseeable future.

Okay, great. Thanks for taking the questions.

Our next question is from Chris Howerton from Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks for taking the question. The first one I had was just on the Fanapt sales and what we can kind of expect moving forward that has I think the sales force be headed for a couple of months now or I guess one month or two month depending on exactly when they started. What can you tell us exactly about the promotional sensitivities and how we might expect that to change the dynamics again kind of in-line with Jason's questions relative to the price increases?

Yes. I'll take to begin with the question and I'll have Tom Gibbs if you want to follow up on that. On the timing, the 12 dedicated new sales force was actually put in place in the field, beginning of August. So clearly, we have little experience and given the cycle of business and expectation, it is early to know, however, with the early date looking at this 12 allocators, we are encouraged that the business is stabilizing and we do not see the clear decline that we saw in the overall market. It is hard for me right now with this early data to set expectations. All we can say is that for the year, the guidance we gave of 60 million to 70 million will continue to be true and we feel confident we’ll be within that guidance. Certainly, there are lot of things that we want to do with Fanapt. One is secure the long runway into the late 2020s and beyond based on our IP portfolio and second grow the business. And just to remark before Tom comes in on that, the Fanapt market share is minimum now. It is less than 0.3%. So we believe there is definitely a lot of opportunity to continue to grow that presence and there are ways to grow it. Tom can an address what we’re doing now, but I can speak of the future as well. Fanapt is indicated only for the treatment of schizophrenia in the acute setting. We’re submitting an SNDA application with very strong maintenance data, which hopefully will be reviewed and beyond the label by mid-year next year. We’re also looking to expand the label in other ways, as we're securing our runway on the patent exclusivity, of course, there are some obvious and non-obvious things. Obvious meaning to expand the indication to additional bipolar disorder, bipolar depression, et cetera but also, explore the reinstitution of the clinical program over the long-term injectable, but I’ll turn it over to Tom to give you a little bit more guidance on what we are thinking now.

Thanks, Mihael and Chris, thanks for the question. I think it's important just to provide a little bit of context in terms of what we've been doing with the salesforce. If you recall, we just had -- in April, we launched Fanapt with our 28-person account management team and they we spending about 25% of their time on promoting Fanapt and we did see as we talked about a slowing of the decline, the rate of decline just with adding the 28 account managers on there. In July/August we launched our pilot, the Fanapt 12 looking at creating a competitive share of voice in certain territories to determine the promotional responsiveness of Fanapt when we had a competitive share of voice. And when we drill down at the individual territory level, we were able to measure the promotional response based up on reach and frequency. And based upon the early data it provided a strong signal confirming the promotional sensitivity of Fanapt. Based upon those data, we have decided to expand the Fanapt 12 to Fanapt 50 where we are going to be populating 50 of the most productive territories creating a competitive share of voice which we think we will be able to replicate the results that we saw within the Fanapt 12 and stabilize the Fanapt business existing 2015.

Got it. Great. Okay, that’s helpful. Thank you. And then I guess along the same lines, is there anymore color that you can give us in terms of the roadmap for the launch in Europe the HETLIOZ and maybe a little more granularity in terms of timing throughout the year and 2016 for that launch time?

Yes. First of all, we are committed to finalize the plant’s plan. Now that we have Gian Piero leading this effort in Europe, we are going to be able to give more details in the future. However, having said that here is the early roadmap. The approval came in the beginning of the summer. We had already initiated activities to develop the dossiers necessary for pricing and reimbursement discussions in various countries in Europe. We have focused and expand significant effort with the German authorities and we think we are in a good path there to pursue the pricing and reimbursement cycle. In parallel, we are starting the awareness activity connecting with blind advocacy organizations around the continent and start to understand the pace and flow in individual countries. So I would say this is it for now and in the coming months, hopefully we can talk in more detail of how the EU launch plan will be unfolded.

Okay, great. Thanks for taking my questions.

Thanks, Chris.

And our next question is from Josh Schimmer from Piper Jaffray. Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking the questions. A few housekeeping ones and one more strategic one. Jim, you had mentioned I think it was HETLIOZ or something, destocking in the quarter, can you quantify the amount?

I am glad you brought it up, because you are right. It’s actually the first time in our – since our launch that we actually saw a downtick in inventories at an end of the period. And so that in and of itself is something that we monitor closely as we moved forward. We don’t think that that’s going to something that we will continue to see the more something that was specific to this quarter. I would not call it something that was too much beyond double digits in terms of the number of units, but just share the fact that it was directionally down was worth noting.

Okay. And then R&D quarter-over-quarter was up fairly heavily, you had indicated a few reasons for that. What do we think of as the run rate going forward for R&D, is it more reflective of Q2 or Q3?

Yeah, so the majority, the vast majority of the $4 million sequential uptick was the end of what is the long term maintenance study and filing expenses in the US. So that is not something that of course you expect as part of a go-forward run rate. And so you are going to see us do on that in particular is, we will come back to you more so as a part of articulating the jet lag study parameters for ‘16 where we are going to be able to better articulate how our run rate for R&D will change as you go from ‘15 to ‘16, but I would have an eye towards that as being the primary driver of year-over-year run rate R&D change.

Got it. And then there is, you highlighted a few drivers for sequential increase in SG&A going into fourth quarter. Can you give us any sense of – I mean it sounds like there could be a meaningful step up in SG&A across all these parameters, certainly expand in the US Fanapt sales force and prepping for the EU launch. So any added colors to the magnitude of that step up would be most helpful.

Yeah, so I think there is two pieces to that. One is, to hit the low end of the range, I highlighted that it would take at least 3.6 million sequential step up and then I went on to say that at this time it looks likely that we are going to be looking at the lower end of the guidance range for the full year. So that would tell you that it’s 3.6 million or something just above that as being the sequential change. And then when you think about our SG&A spend year-to-date, one of the things that we really have been happy with so far is how much we’ve been able to see Fanapt deliver to our business without really putting whole heck of a lot behind it. And we saw and we are data driven with our Fanapt 12 pilot and taken some pretty quick action to really capitalize on what we are seeing as a promotional sensitivity in that area. So that’s one of the important sequential changes. And then of course we will begin to do some incremental work for Europe and the EU as well.

Got it. And then as you think about the potential commercial opportunity in jet lag, maybe you can talk to us a little bit about willingness to pay either on the part of the payers or by travelers and how do you capture travelers at a time when they are ready and willing to pay and get a prescription recognized in that, not everyone needs time at the airport to check in to an airport on that, just how that might work and what people would be willing to pay for jetlag.

Josh, great questions. I don’t think that we are ready now to discuss the full business model, but certainly we want to say couple of things about that. The size of the opportunity as most of the people understand is vast. We are talking about 100 million travelers in flight that cross five or more time zones a year and therefore just imagining a very, very small fraction of that being treated with HETLIOZ because of their need and the significant impact of a jet lag disorder symptoms can spell a significant opportunity. Now your question of payers and pricing opportunities, I would say there are many parameters. You are mentioning some and there are many potential solutions. This does not have to be a classic payer model, but rather there are many opportunities for innovation and we are in an active process of exploring them. Couple of things to keep in mind is, we are working through that. Our number one priority will be to ensure the continuous HETLIOZ non-24 growth. And that also means protecting the relative price sensitivity of that market versus the jet lag disorder market and we believe there again many solutions to that. When it comes to interplay of who the payers are, who the target population can be, to what extent and what is the effect of price elasticity. And again many studies can be done. We are beginning this work and all we can find in front of us is actually a book of potential solutions that spell eventually only one thing. That if indeed HETLIOZ is proven to work in jet lag disorder, there will be more than one model that can spell commercial success.

Great, thank you.

Our next question is from Difei Yang from Brean Capital. Please go ahead.

Hi, good afternoon and thanks for taking my question. Just a couple. And the first one is related to HETLIOZ, with the price increase would you comment on how you are seen gross to net adjustment over the past several quarters, I guess over, over the past several months, let's say six months.

I will take the front end and Jim can answer the gross to net trend question. So again, as we said earlier, year-to-date we have made price adjustments. However, the majority of the revenue growth came from new patients and was the minority of revenue growth that was supported by price. Now onto the gross to net.

Yeah, sure. While we haven't gotten into a ton of specific gross to net quarter-to-quarter, here are the some of the overarching guidance that I've given to people throughout the year. Full year basis a good rule of thumb for the HETLIOZ gross to net is it’s about 10%. And the highest quarter tends to be Q1 and that was due to the Medicare coverage gap liability. And then as you think about the rest of the year, you of course see a step down on Q1 to Q2 and gross to net that for the most part carries pretty consistent throughout the rest of the year.

Okay, thank you. And then moving up to Fanapt. During the past quarter, so Q3, was there a price increase on Fanapt?

No, there was not.

Okay. Thank you. So the next question is on jet lag. When do you expect the readout for jet lag study?

We’re finalizing those tables, timelines. We're doing two things, we're running in front of the phase 3 interventional study. We're running an observational study to evaluate the details of the protocol and that will inform a little more about power in number of patients, et cetera. So for now, I would say results of the pivotal phase 3 study should be by early to mid-2017.

Okay, you thank you, that's helpful. So my final question is on the salesforce, so now that you go from 12 reps to 50 reps, does that mean you would be looking for a second product for that salesforce to sell?

I think we can keep them busy with Fanapt certainly there is a lot of training, a lot of focus. We want the salesforce to do a good job. We're talking about stabilization of a decline that we’ve seen since the product was not really promoted very actively with the prior sponsor. We need to fix that first and that will take all their focus. Of course, if we have a salesforce that becomes efficient and productive, we will certainly be always thinking of how to better leverage its existence.

Yeah, thank you very helpful.

And our last question is from Stefan Quenneville from Morningstar. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks for taking the question. I wanted to ask you guys about the Fanapt patents and the ongoing litigation, if you could provide some sort of guidance on, if and when we'll be hearing some potential decisions over the next year or so?

Yes, thank you very much. So, as you know we have several now cases Paragraph IV filings that we are litigating against, the lead case is against Roxane, there is a scheduled court hearing for a four-day bench trial starting February 29, 2016. And towards that hearing as we announced after the September Markman hearing, we had a successful hearing where our Claim Construction was adopted by the court, it’s certainly is a good thing. Of course, I want to remind you that in that trial we’re litigating against two patents NCE patent and 610 patent and we have additional cases and cases that we have already brought as a lawsuit forward against Roxane and the others which include the more recently listed 432 patent, for which there is no judicial calendar yet. So, I would say the most significant near-term milestone will be the February 2016 litigation against Roxane for NCE and 610 patents.

Okay, great, thanks for that color that's very helpful. Could you guys talk a bit about your direct to consumer spend and sort of any trends you’re seeing there, any plans for the program going forward, just to get a sense of how it's been working as the launch progresses?

All I can say Stefan is, every time we don't run the DTC, we regret it -- run it, we see something very important that the spend surprisingly has remained steady per optimum, which is an amazing thing and speaks to the thousands of patients that are out there deciding to take the first step, opting and learn more. So we're getting better at it of identifying when and how to advertise, but Tom was discussing with us a few weeks ago, an amazing number that in some early study of market awareness that he did, he saw that aided awareness of non-24 among the general US public was about 45%, which is an amazing number, some car brands don't have that. But also it tells you that it is good that we have created the connection between non-24 and blindness in the minds of consumers. But the fact that we continue to enroll opt-ins at the same cost that we did a year ago, it shows the unsaturated nature of this market. This is what drives a lot of our optimism that new patient growth is to be had, but also requires patience. It is a new market; it's a market that starts not with a 45% awareness, but actually close to 0 awareness a year and a half ago. And all these cycles take a little time, we're satisfied that we're going of course we’re anxious to see a lot more patients benefiting from the treatment. And just the simple math is that we have under a 1,000 patients, only several hundred patients on treatment and we all know that there are tens of thousands of them potentially out there that have not taken the first step of learning more and starting the discussions. That is what makes us optimistic that new patient growth should be forecasted in the future.

Great, thanks for color.

We have no further questions at this time; I would like to turn the call over to Dr. Polymeropoulos for closing remarks.

Thank you very much all for joining this call and thank you very much for the interest in Vanda. Thank you.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference. Thank you for participating, you may now disconnect.