Good afternoon, and welcome to the Organovo Fiscal Fourth Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Steve Kunszabo. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, and thanks for joining us. I'd like to welcome you to our fiscal fourth quarter 2017 earnings call. Joining me on the call this afternoon are CEO, Taylor Crouch; our CFO, Craig Kussman; and our General Manager, Paul Gallant. Today's call will begin with the discussion of the 2017 fiscal fourth quarter results, followed by Q&A. Before I turn things over to Taylor, I'd like to caution all participants that our call this afternoon may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical fact, and include statements about our future expectations, plans, and prospects. Such forward-looking statements are based upon our current beliefs and expectations, and are subject to risks, which could cause actual results to differ from the forward-looking statements. Such risks are more fully discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our remarks today should be considered in light of such risks. Any forward-looking statements represent our views only as of today, and while we may elect to update forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, even if our expectations or views change. During the call, we'll also be referring to certain non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Please refer to today's earnings release for a definition of these non-GAAP financial measures. With that, let me turn things over to Taylor.

Thanks, Steve, and good afternoon, everyone. Let me start by noting that it's an honor to be hosting my first earnings call here as the new CEO of this remarkable company. I'm grateful for the warm welcome I've received from our analysts and investors, our customers and partners and my many talented colleagues at Organovo. We're developing innovative solutions and growing a dynamic business that has the potential to dramatically enhance how new drugs are explored and profiled. At the same time, we've embarked on a therapeutic program built on our unique ability to create human tissue for critical unmet need. I'm thrilled to have joint Organovo during such a transformational time in its history and look forward to our shared success in the years to come. Before I turn to the customary business of our earnings call, I'd like to spend a bit of time on my professional background and highlight some of the important capabilities I see at Organovo based on my experience in drug development and R&D partnerships. Most recently, I worked to build a group of three investigative clinical research site groups and two leaders in their respective fields spanning over 20 major therapeutic areas and tens of millions of dollars in annual revenues for a broad spectrum of major pharmaceutical and biotech clients. Notably these companies are on the cutting edge of infectious and metabolic diseases impacting the liver, including hepatitis C, diabetes and nash otherwise known as fatty liver. Many of these same clients are also turning to Organovo to facilitate the understanding of their drugs in our disease models. I've also read other high growth companies including my nine years leading the sales effort at Paraxel -- a global CRO, which enjoys nearly a 5-fold increase in organic revenues during my tenure. Most…

Thanks Taylor and good afternoon everyone. I'll begin by summarizing our key financial metrics for the fiscal fourth quarter and then take you through the new fiscal 2018 guidance we issued today. I'll wrap up my thoughts by briefly reviewing our balance sheet and liquidity profile. Organovo generated fiscal fourth quarter total revenue $0.8 million which was up 48% from the prior year period but down 29% sequentially. On a year-over-year basis, total revenue benefited from a significant increase in customer activity for our liver tissue research services. On a sequential basis our total revenues declined as expected due to the delayed customer orders we described on our last earnings call. You'll recall that we receive customer requests to qualify an additional sell source as well as for additional validation data to support specific use case. Taken together, these items delayed several hundred thousand dollars of our forecasted revenue into fiscal 2018. I can now share that we successfully qualified the additional sell source that our customers required to move forward with their orders. And we anticipate recognizing the associated revenue in the first half of fiscal 2018. As for the validation studies to support specific use cases, this work is ongoing with strong engagement from our customers. We're taking the necessary steps to optimize our tissues for certain client specific needs and expect it will reach a successful conclusion that similarly allows us to record the deferred revenue this fiscal year. I'll focus next on operating expenses. We recorded $0.2 million in cost of revenues for the fiscal fourth quarter. It captures our costs related to manufacturing and delivering our product and service rather. It's an important indicator of how effectively we're commercializing the business and provides insight to our financial health when considering the associated profit margins. Fiscal…

Thank you. The first question is from Ross Muken with Evercore.

Hi guys, its Luke in for Ross today. How are you doing?

All right. How are you doing Luke?

We're doing great. I guess just kind of looking at the commercial, the tissue side. Can you just talk about the cross-selling opportunities that you guys have seen? How many of your customers are actually becoming kidney and liver versus just the liver as before?

Hi Luke, this is Taylor. Nice to meet you or to meeting in the near future. Let me start by saying that actually cross-selling is a good question, but actually our more immediate focus is cross-selling within accounts of penetrating our capabilities testing across multiple users and large pharmaceutical companies and engaging them in both the therapeutic and healthy liver tissue model capabilities of the company. So what we're seeing is an important uptake in repeat business with clients that started working with us last year, while -- enjoying a steady flow of brand new customers to the full. We certainly have also had a number of engaging discussions around the kidney and our learning curve on the liver platform which was to continue rapidly with our research to explore disease model in the tissues, seems to be a recurring demand also on the kidney side. So you'll hear us talking just as much about our kidney research as about early adoption from clients on the kidney side.

Great. That's helpful. Then I guess when you talk about penetrating deeper into the accounts and accelerating the revenue growth, how much is it where you have established name for yourself with the commercial capabilities and how better your model has been what's currently available? How much of it is swinging for the fences on large projects versus still trying to prove out the capabilities to clients?

Great question again, Taylor here. The process that we're seeing starts with companies typically saying we really like your model can you tweak it for this particular purpose either to fit the class of drugs we are interested in or set of markers or other capabilities they'd like to see particularly given that dynamic capability of our models, which really is out in the marketplace. Then we see client progressing to multiple tests of our capabilities and or validation let's say across donors or across classes of drugs. And finally, this is exciting for us. We're beginning to see the first, or hold the first conversations with some of our larger clients about how would we translate these capabilities into routine screening program across large number of discovery candidates and across a long period of time. So I think that's going to be sort of the three stage adoption curve that we see and occasionally we'll see clients jump in at a much larger level, but the predominant scenario is that three stage adoption Craig has mentioned.

I guess last on guidance. As you look at the revenue ramp, it's still pretty steep and as expected and it was -- and how we look at the business in general. What kind of puts and takes do you see within the - you talked about the second half ramp, but what are your assumptions within that for the different tissues there?

Well, I think we try to be pretty thoughtful about describing how we think the year has shaped in the comments that Craig went through with tight guidance on Q1, a sense of the fact that the second half will represent yet another revenue ramp versus the first half and how we expect to exit the year with regards to run rate. We see the largest volume of those revenues coming from my liver tissue services both in healthy and disease model studies. And we see that building up along that expectancy curve or that adoption curve that I mentioned before.

Okay, great. Thanks.

The next comes from Brandon Couillard from Jefferies.

Thanks good afternoon. Taylor, appreciate some of your comments on what attracted you to the company. It sounds like much of the strategy that will remain intact on terms of the strategic focus. But do you see any opportunities commercially to perhaps push harder in certain areas or certain aspects of how you go to market that you think you can do a better job on?

Thanks, Brandon also looking forward to meeting you tomorrow. By the way I just reached over and pushed Paul Gallant, our General Manager so that was good advice that you just gave me. We are actually pretty excited about the uptake. We mentioned the 50 new client projects in 2016 versus 10 the prior year. And if you take any model and apply it to an increasing number of new clients and repeat business adoption curve like I described, I think our challenge will be just as much to process and manage this increasing volume of plan as it is to reach these revenue growth goals that we've described. That being said there is an experimental component to everything that we do and we really are working on cutting edge dynamic modeling systems. And our clients surprisingly and quite pleasingly are engaging with this real time versus saying, sounds good figure it out, get it published and come talk to us in two years. Many of our clients want to be with us side by side on this mission, so lots of very positive dynamic. We'll certainly evaluate the number of folks we had out selling and position our business. I myself love rolling up my sleeves and joining the process. I have already participated in 10 client meetings just in the last week and expect to continue at least at that pace for as long as I'm CEO of the company. So I think we will all hands on deck going out to capture opportunities as well focusing on how to process and deliver along with steep ramp.

I guess a two part question for Craig. Number 1, could you speak to the materiality of the call it the ancillary the metabolic services that I think you began to offer last year? And then secondarily, if I take the 50 plus orders and just divide that by fiscal 17 issue revenue that comes up with something like $63,000 per order. Help me understand the delta between that and what you described is your typical contract size for liver 150 to 250?

Yes, so with respect to the first part of the question on metabolism. We thus far we've had a couple of orders, so it's not what I would call material in terms of either the 5% or 10% threshold from that standpoint. But we do expect that to grow in the future. And then with respect to the second part of the question which was. The average selling price, yes, so when we quote a figure of $150,000 or $200,000 per year per customer, that's an annual amount that we would expect to receive from a given customer that would basically include multiple orders of the types that we have in our figure. So you can think of the 60 times the three on average per year is what we would reconcile with that number. So it's not -- when we gave the $150,000 to $200,000 that would be for what we would expect a given client to spend across the set of compounds they are screening in a given year.

Thanks and then maybe one for Paul. Any feedback that you'd like to share coming out of the SOT meeting and it doesn't sound like kidney is really going to be a material contributor to the revenues next year. Any I guess numbers or in terms of number of clients or data points, if you can share with us about how that launch is going?

I think the SOT conference was fantastic. We had a great presence there including a number of poster presentations and podium presentations and we had a significant booth presence as well as with a lot of traffic from existing customers as well as potentially future customers as well. And so that is sort of translating post that conference into deeper adoption into the accounts. So we found certain accounts where we've already been working in but other groups were not aware of us at all and our presence at SOT has a lot of us to open up into and deeper penetrate these individual accounts. With regards to the kidney there is a significant interest in the kidney space and as we are out talking to customers and the voice of the customer they have a need for kidney for sure in the top space, so one of the high areas of interest and demand and we're working to address in the area transporters to look at either drug interaction or drug elimination and processing in the kidney and that's the area of functionality, invalidation that we're currently doing in house.

And maybe Taylor here to add one other comment, it's interesting as we've started talking to our clients about fibrosis and highlighting the capabilities of our liver fibrosis model. Pharmaceutical companies across the spectrum of fibrosis research as you know this is encouraging the lung, skin, kidney, liver and other areas are coming to tease out how our model may help them even in different related fields because many of the mechanisms of fibrosis are similar. So while we're still developing these capabilities in the kidney, we're seeing clients engage with us to utilize the liver cell to understand fibrotic mechanisms of their drug.

Thanks and maybe one more. Did you give a metric on how many of the top 25 pharma, you count these customers I think last quarter it was 11.

I think we've decided not to continue keeping track or I should say it differently not to keep a running score card for you. We continue to penetrate the top 25 pharmaceutical companies. We also are heartened by the fact that many of our clients and including Astellas, Merck and Advi [ph] have presented in public forums our data and credited us and in many cases disclosed collaborations that we can't talk about. So we've just decided maybe to talk more about general adoption and I also kind of want to highlight the fact that some of the most sophisticated company's focused and liver research are mid-sized as well as biotech companies. And these are so are increasingly among the first adopters of our capabilities so I think the validation did not just from large sophisticated pharma companies, but from the leaders in liver research across the spectrum of companies.

Understood. Look forward to meet you tomorrow. Thanks so much.

Thanks.

The next question is from Reni Benjamin at Raymond James.

Hi guys, this is Ian [ph] in on for Reni. Thanks for taking my questions and congrats on the progress made for the quarter. The first question I have is can you talk about sort of the data presentations that we might be expecting - and then I have some follow-ups. Thank you.

Yes. We actually, just as we had a publications at the team meeting in March, we continue to commit and check articles to a number of journals as well as some of the key upcoming meeting. So I think you will see us regularly referring to new presentation. We're participating in 12 conferences coming up over the next year with either posters or presentation, as well as publication. So we find it quite active in that area.

Great, thanks. Looking forward to seeing that. And then maybe can you provide some additional color regarding the profile of the 46 compounds you have studied so far? So when the safety off all that compound not successfully predicted by other models in the pre-clinical setting and I remember you mentioned the heat rate was quite high there. So what was the number, was that in the 80% range or 90% range? Thank you.

Sure so it's Taylor - validation, so anyway. So we've completed the study of 46 compounds and this is a collection of compound which has clinical data on them that have demonstrated liver talk. And some of those compounds are perfectly safe and did not demonstrate liver toxic, those are some controls that we ran alongside with these experiments because what our customers are looking for in terms of the validated tool is to understand how predictive that tool is and looking at the predictive power of calling something a positive or a negative. And so we chose a set of compounds with our feedback from our customers that we're either will be termed easy to detect which are some compounds that are just words detected by other preclinical systems and other ones which are hard to detect which were essentially missed by existing preclinical systems. And a compilation of that data is what we were describing today where we're looking around 80% where we scored extremely well and this is just the initial set of data we'll be generating more in the near future.

Great. That's very encouraging data. So one final question from me is, so given the data you have so far and your conversation with your existing clients as well as potential customers. So what else do you think they may want to see from the data perspective so that they would increase their usage of the tissue models?

It's a question we review in our commercial R&D team. The wish-list from our clients is extensive only because not only is there a spectrum non-alcoholic fatty liver disease progresses all the way to cirrhosis and ultimately cancer and transplant and ideally we would have mono data along that entire spectrum. But also infectious disease impacting liver, the various viral diseases hepatitis A, B, C, D et cetera or other areas that our clients would love us to tee up in our research programs and then there are specific conditions of the liver one of which we are using as our proof of principle in our tissue therapeutics program the inborn errors of metabolism area. What we're finding and I mentioned it before is that clients are waiting for us to complete our research mission. They are really engaging with us giving us good ideas in some cases challenging us and bringing their own strategy to the table and working with us side by side on some of those new challenges that I just mentioned and bill in a commercially attractive way for the company. So it truly is an ideal partnership. And we would expect a similar rollout of that kind of uptake on the kidney side as we start to dance those programs.

Great, that's very helpful. Thank you. Good luck going forward.

Thank you.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. And the conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.