Good day, ladies and gentlemen. And welcome to Virtu Financial 2015 Second Quarter Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question and answer session, and instructions will follow at that time. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this call is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Andrew Smith, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Daniel. Good morning. As you now, our second quarter results were released this morning and are available on our website. Today's call may include forward-looking statements which represent Virtu's belief regarding future events and are therefore subject to risks, assumptions, and uncertainties which may be outside the company's control. Our actual results and financial condition may differ materially from what is indicated in these forward-looking statements. It's important to note that any forward-looking statements made on this call are based upon information presently available to the company and we do not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking statements as new information becomes available. We refer you to the disclaimers in our press release, and encourage you to review the description of risk factors contained in our final S-1 registration statement. In addition to GAAP results, we may refer to certain non-GAAP measures including adjusted net trading income, adjusted net income, adjusted EBITDA, and adjusted EBITDA margin. We believe these non-GAAP measures are more reflective of our operations and core business performance. You'll find a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the equivalent GAAP term in the earnings materials with an explanation of why we deem this information to be meaningful as well as how management uses these measures. When used on this call, adjusted net trading income refers to our trading income net of all interest and dividend income and expenses, and all brokerage and clearing exchange rebates and/or fees. Speaking and answering your questions today are Mr. Douglas Cifu, our Chief Executive Officer; and Mr. Joseph Molluso, our Chief Financial Officer. They will begin with prepared remarks and then take your questions. I would now like to turn the call over to Doug.

Great, thanks very much, Andrew. Good morning and thank you everybody for joining our call this morning. As you are aware, Virtu reported second quarter results earlier today. We are pleased with our overall performance in the second quarter. While the second quarter was marked by a less favorable volume environment than what we experienced in the first quarter of 2015, the geographic and asset class diversitifcation of Virtu enable us to generate approximately $106 million of adjusted net trading income during the quarter. Unlike the first quarter we did not benefit from periods of sustained increases in volume or volatility that we enjoyed in January and February of this year with the exception being the events in Greece which only impacted volumes and volatility for the last several trading days of the second quarter, and primarily only in the currency market. Despite system challenging volume environment, we continue to perform well. I'm particularly proud of our performance and progress in Europe and in Asia which I will go into in more detail later. During the second quarter we continue to benefit from our scale, and our global fixed cost platform which allowed us to achieve approximately 68% adjusted EBITDA margins during the quarter. As noted in our press release, consistent with our practices since the inception of Virtu, we are returning excess capital to our owners. Our Board of Directors has declared a $0.24 per share dividend which is payable on September 15, 2015, to shareholders of record as of September 1st. As we described in the recent roadshow for our initial public offering and the prospective, we understand that we manage Virtu for the benefit of our owners and a comprehensive capital return policy will remain the hallmark of this firm going forward. Our firm wide adjusted net…

Okay. Thanks, Doug. I'll review a summary of our results and point out some financial highlights before we open it up to Q&A. First, I'd like to offer a few words on the format of our financial presentation and sort through some of the various definitions. The financial statements and other GAAP related disclosures contained in our press release and in our 10-Q include the results of Virtu Financial Inc. which is the public company, and those of Virtu Financial LLC in which Virtu Financial Inc. became the managing member and owner of 24.8% of the outstanding membership interest rate Virtu Financial LLC in a series of reorganization transactions that were completed on April 15, 2015 in connection with our IPO. As a consequence, the GAAP earnings per share information reported for this quarter reflects only the net income available for common shareholders for the period from April 16, 2015, through June 30, 2015. Consistent with the financial presentation in our S-1 registration statement and first quarter results, we provide non-GAAP financial information to supplement our presentation which stationed to account results for the entire second quarter despite the fact that our IPO occurred in April. With regards to the second quarter results, our total adjusted net trading income for the second quarter was $105.9 million. Adjusted net trading income was up versus the second quarter of last year in all categories except options, swift income and other. Overall, our adjusted net trading income was up 12% versus the prior year. Our average daily adjusted net trading income was $1.68 million per day. Most selective benchmark volume we track were also up versus the second quarter of last year. These include US equity ADV, up about 5%, EU equity ADV up about 14%, stock exchange equity ADV up about 16%,…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Rick Repetto from Sandler O'Neill. Your line is now open, please go ahead.

Yes, good morning, Doug, Good morning, Joe.

Good morning, Rich.

Good morning, Rich.

I guess the first question is on July's robustness and you did go through some metrics but – and you talked about US equities being up, but energy is up, the VIX is up slightly. So I guess the question is July, if you looked at it, to be a little bit more specific, would the run rate be above 2Q in that adjusted net trading income?

Thanks, Rich, good question. I mean, US equities was up 6% and that's obviously a leading indicator of how we're doing around the world. Europe was actually slightly down but we performed better in July in Europe than we did in the second quarter. So, we're – it's early, it's only – 21 of the 60 odd trading days in the quarter but the fact that US equity volumes were about 6.7 billion share a day as compared to 6.3 billion on average for 2015. This is certainly positive for the firm, so the run rate for July was higher than the average run rate for the second quarter but obviously – August, you can have some slowness, when everyone goes after the half since everything else is in their last week or so of August. It will be interesting this year Rich because Labor Day is late, and school started earlier to see if the last week in August we may see some incremental trading activity. So, you know I'm an optimist by nature so I'm excited about the third quarter.

Great. And I guess my one follow-up would be on the expense, Joe, like especially the comp because you're running at about 16% in the first half but it vary dramatically between 1Q and 2Q. So just some color on what would be a reasonable comp ratio in the back half of '15?

Yes, I mean – Rich, I think looking it at June 30 year-to-date percentage is probably the best way to look at it. A strength of our business model is that our comp accrual isn't based on a strict percentage of net revenues, right, so that's straight – what that mean is earlier in the year we have left those abilities on individual performance and it's more subjective. So first quarter we have least visibility, second quarter we have little bit more, and in third and fourth quarter we obviously get sharper than what the accrual is. I think if you look at June 30 comp in the revenues, that's probably the best guideline going forward.

Got it, thanks. And I'll obey the rules, and that will be it. Thank you.

Alright Rich, thanks for being a rule follower.

Good soldier.

Thanks, buddy.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Ken Worthington from JP Morgan. Your line is now open, please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. In terms of China, I don't think you mentioned it but what type of firm are you partnering with, is it a bank or broker or data provider, like, what sort of angle are you taking? And then – again, I don't think you mentioned this but what asset classes are you starting with – is it just equities? And does this existing partner allow you to hook up with various other exchanges or do you need to expand your relationships to others to break into other areas?

Great question, thanks Ken. The local partner that we've chosen is a well-known bank brokerage house. I should thank and point out relationship again, as I do on every call with Tomasic [ph], very significant shareholder, who they are, if I'm a Singapore investment arm, they took myself and one of our partners in Asia and to Hong Kong, meet a bunch of people and this was the partner that they directed us to. They multi-asset class, multi-functional firm, and not surprisingly we are starting with our core strength which is really the commodities segment but this relationship allows us to make markets across all of the future exchanges and the equity exchange in Greater China. So we intend to do that. Again, it's early stage, the results are positive thus far, it's not dissimilar to our entry into other market places, obviously we're very cognizant of the macro factors and the geopolitical issues going on in the country but it's we're two business as usual, we're not opening up an office. We're putting booths on the ground, it's gearing the data center and strict compliance with all the regulatory standards in the marketplace. So if you look at the volumes overall, particularly in the commodity space there and – we're excited about it but it's going to be a number of chores before we see any meaningful contribution to adjusted net trading income.

Okay, great. And then just to help us view better understand your business, how much better were the last couple of days of the month when currency markets for example started to get more active with Greece, then either the low point during the quarter or maybe like the average during the quarter. Again, I'm just trying to get a sense of when times are particularly good, how much better are they than the average? And when times are bad, how much worse are they than the average? Like any kind of sense would be helpful.

Well, I mean if you look at famous histogram from our IPO which I will never talk about again except for this one exception which I will talk about it. You can see some of the days on the right hand side of the SKU if you will and those are generally results of significant volatility days. So I'm not suggesting that the results are always 3X if you will, our typical day, but – it really depends upon, I'm not trying to avoid the question, it really depends upon what the event is, if you have something like the Swiss National Bank depegging, that affects a multitude of asset classes, and so therefore you can really see the volatility rip off through. So in that instance you will have like a 3X average, adjusted net trading income for particular trading day. The Euro – the Greek crisis was a little more sort of built in, if you will, I think people were expecting some level of volatility so I'm not suggesting it was a yawn, at that point it was not. So on June 29th and 30th I just looked at a couple of days here, the US equities volume was 7.6 billion shares per day as compared to an average of 6.4 billion shares. So it was an uptick but it wasn't like we blew out, we're trading 10 billion to 11 billion shares a day. So it's helpful, but I think in this instance it was really limited to those last two trading days in June. It didn't make up for a 59 or 60 days of – what I would call normalized volumes volatility throughout our golden markets.

Got it. Great, thank you very much.

Thanks, Ken.

Thank you. And your next question comes from the Alex Goldstein [ph] from Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open, please go ahead.

Great, good morning guys. Just a follow-up on the – I guess on the global currency business one more time. When we look on a year-over-year basis, obviously both the volumes and volatility, not just kind of your proxy volumes bucket but across some of the other buckets those were definitely better than flattish. So maybe we'll be helpful just kind of flush out a little bit more either percentage of days where you guys made money, lost money in currencies together, so a better sensible volatility in that bucket. And I guess, along the same lines, maybe it will helpful to get an update on some of the organic initiatives you guys are doing in the currency business with streaming directly and things like that.

Yes, great question, thank you Alex. Again, I'm not going to talk about days won and lost – I'm trying really hard to get away from that histogram but the currencies business was – did just fine relative to the opportunity in the quarter. I think the point I was trying to make in the remarks is that the CME FX volumes unhappily are very inaccurate on inconsistent proxy if you will for how we're going to perform. You guys probably know this better than I do in terms of the analyst, what percentage of the volume that we see is really in the spot and the forward market and how we access that. So we just look at what my good friend Chris Continuum reports on Hotspot, Reuters and those guys were up single-digit percentages as compared to the CME which was up significantly larger. So if you look at the overall pie and which we could market mix, I think there was modest increases but not as outside if you will as the CME volumes would indicate. That's the first point I'd make. The second point is that absent for last few days and obviously some of the Balkan in the European, it was really muted volatility in the second quarter, vis-à-vis the FX business, particularly the role period on the CME. And so we did not get the benefits that we saw in the first quarter where you had this exogenous event that really ripple through for 20 to 25 trading days in the first quarter. So, it was a volume environment that was not as pronounced that the CME volumes would indicate, number one. Number two, the volatility during the second quarter, and currency products was just not that interesting. So therefore you see like a…

Great thanks for the details.

Thanks for the spread out.

Thank you. And your next question comes from Chris Allen from Evercore. Your line is now open, please go ahead.

Good morning, guys.

Good morning, Chris.

Not to be the dead horse on the FX side, I'm just wondering if there is any competitive pressures in the FX markets that you saw? I think you noted that competition will be picking up a little bit last quarter. Could you kind of put it all together in terms of overall a lot bigger VFX growing, so I'm still kind of scratching my head at the year-over-year performance there.

It's a good question. I wouldn't shock it up to competitor pressures, I saw your note this morning where you indicated that might be the case, I'm not concerned about competition, and I'm not concerned that folks are squeezing our margins. Again, I just come back to the fact that if you ask your good buddy, Chris [ph] what hotspot volumes were quarter-over-quarter, I think they were roughly about 3%. And so that in my view maybe a little bit of a better proxy for where we can market, make a very large participant on hotspot. Our market share on hotspot certainly would be larger than our overall market share would be on the CME. And we continue to have – our rankings on the major platforms continue to be high or if not higher than they were in the first quarter. Chris, I think there was just less opportunity in the second quarter in FX. I mean we saw a tremendous events in the first quarter for FX, last year there were couple of unique situations in FX that we were able to provide liquidity that just no longer exists, that happens in this business. So I'm not thrilled, if you will – our FX business didn't grow to a level that it was consistent with the CME volumes. Obviously, and my job as a CEO is taking you to grow at double-digit. But at the end of the day when you have less volatility, you're going to have smaller spreads, people are little more careful how they get in and out of positions, and at the end of the day that's not a positive thing for market making firm. So, and my guess is the point about our currencies business second quarter, yes, on some level I am but I think I'm not – I don't think there was a result at all of competition, I think we are very well positioned. As I said, we make markets in over 80 different pairs, we're connected to dozens of platforms, we added incremental counterparties during the quarter, and I can see to be very bullish, that's an asset class that will continue to grow Again, you saw the strength of our model, the energy business, the commodities business was up and became our number one category and that's going to happen quarter-to-quarter with this firm.

Got it, that's helpful. And then the other line, this is your smallest bucket options, fixed income and other – I know there is a ton of different moving pieces in asset classes enveloped in there. Just – why don't you give any color on the sequential year of your performance?

Yes, it is the smallest bucket, we just throw all the little stuff in there that we do which would be fixed income and some options market making. It was just – there was less volatility again in the second quarter, less opportunity for us, nothing really too exciting to report there. Again, we don't ignore it but we've consistently said, we're not a significant options market making firm. There are certain market structure – shall I say market structure advantages that we don't have. And so if and when that becomes a more flat all to all marketplace, one can only dream. I we'll become the more significant market maker, but we just left the opportunity unless volatility in that asset class during the quarter.

Thanks a lot guys.

Thanks, Chris.

Thank you. And your next question comes from Bill Katz from Citi. Your line is now open, please go ahead.

Hi, this is actually Ryan Bailey filling for Bill. So I had a quick question I guess on – we think about capture issues so we look at volumes by your different assets classes. And then the revenue you generate from that. It seems to have trended downwards recently, I was just wondering if you could give us any insight in this because and then maybe trends going forward?

Thank you, Ryan. Joe, you want to – are you straightforward to a specific asset class, Ryan?

It looks like general across asses the buckets from the way we are tracking it.

I mean, if you look at quarter-over-quarter, the second quarter, as I said we over performed versus the volumes and EMEA and APAC commodities, we underperformed in currencies, finally underperformed in equities. I think year-to-date we're up versus the opportunities as defined by those particularly imperfect categories. Just looking at changed volume versus changing adjusted net trading income, we're seeing mixed results, and I think as Doug said, we'll see from time to time performance against those benchmarks vary, there could be times when we exceed and there could be times when we're below it. I think we choose those six benchmarks knowing they are imperfect and as we talked about a lot on this call, currencies, we love to be able to look at Rogers and Hotpsot and say that's the defined way to do it or look at CME – futures volumes and say that's the defined way to do it and of course that there really is not defined way. We knew the CME FX future volumes that's a benchmark because it's observable, it's a standardized measure. And that's really why we choose it. Again, I'm looking at the second quarter versus second quarter and year-to-date versus year-to-date, I'm not seeing declines versus our benchmarks across the Board.

Yes, I mean Ryan, the only other color I would add is – first quarter, obviously, when you had more volatility you're going to see an expansion of our capture rate, that's – just, if you will, just endemic to people willing to pay more bid offer spread to get into that position and certainly, as a general matter of volatility from most of our fetch [ph], these are the good thinks our capture rate will expand during periods of volatility and volume and that's – you're still on the first quarter. The second quarter, again, I would just describe it as the normalized quarter, the Greek event really did not have a meaningful impact on the quarter, it really happened unhappily with the last few days in June. We were hoping the Greeks and the Germans would start fist and cuffs earlier in May but they didn't. And so therefore we only benefited for a couple of days towards the end of quarter but we can't control those things.

And I see what you mean, you're sequentially – the performance is down versus – but as Doug mentioned, I mean the first quarter was our record quarter, spreads are going to get wider in periods of increased volatility and that's going to extension awaited on the upside.

Okay, that was really helpful. And then just one quick follow-up, I was wondering about the dividend, how should we think about that capture ratio going forward?

You mean the – what –

Sorry, not the capture ration, the payout ratio.

The payout, I understand what you mean.

Capture ratio is good for shareholders.

We said on the roadshow that we would payout 100% of our distributable cash flow, the public company as the Upsea [ph] is entitled to that, you can see our kind of normalized EPS is $0.27, we’re paying a $0.24 dividend we set it at a level $0.24 you know that kind of we said it will 70% to a 100%. Going forward obviously we’re lot closer to 100% in this quarter so that’s how you should think about it. If we’re in a position where we have excess distributable cash flow we will obviously be shareholders.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Ashley Serrao from Credit Suisse. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

I was hoping you just talked about the competitive landscape, there are competitors out there making in-roads into treasuries in the nascent [indiscernible] market, when do you think you will be able to have more meaningful presence there?

I follow some of the comments from Ken Griffin and what they are doing at Citadel and it's a great a firm and they certainly done some wonderful things out there, DRW as well has both being an active participant in set [ph] market and it's has been instrumental in forming steps. So we remember I think it was 5 or 8 steps right now. We’re excited about our participation, we think the interest rate swap market for example actually is going to become somewhat of an all to all market. It has all the hallmarks of a marketplace, that should become an all to all open architecture marketplace, you got to commoditize product that can be price if you will relative to the commoditized instruments that trade electronically, essentially clears and spreads right narrow and wide and that it needs to be. So those are the three or four elements that lead to full electronic price discovery of an instrument. Unfortunately that hasn’t happened yet and if you look at set volumes they have significant open interest but in terms of all to all execution volumes of the sets that haven't happen and we can't create that momentum. We need to Pimpco, the Blackrock's the large fixed income asset management and the natural liquidity seekers if you will to force that marketplace to become more electronics, so it's going to happen the question is when I don’t want to say your guess is as good as mine because I should more intelligent than that but I certainly talk to the fixed income buy side folks and it's not their number one priority right now whether that changes in a non-zero rate environment I think the question is TBD so we remain optimistic that that is the significant growth opportunity…

And then I just want to dig into your 3Q commentary, I'm trying to understand the trade-offs between your growth initiatives and the current volume environment. Is it fair to say that unless you get volatility that drives volumes and some are seasonality, 3Q net trading income is trending lower with expectation of equities?

As Doug said the U.S. equity volume is up in July, we are seeing good results in energy. I don’t think you should make that broader mistake, one of strengths of our model is that we’re not kind of subject to the kind of harsh seasonality that may impact just one capital market. It's just too early to say actually.

And your next question comes from Justin Hughes from Philadelphia Financial. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

I just have one question I want to follow-up on, you mentioned expanding more to ETMs in Europe, I was wondering if that could be on exchange or off exchange because [indiscernible] public and if it's going to be off exchange will you be racking up a sales force to drive that business?

When you said sales force I kind of almost repulsed off the table that’s really not -- we are -- the strength of this firm is that we’re an electronic automated firm, so we’re pricing today 100s and 100s of ETFs and we trade them all electronically. Obviously we have much stronger business in that in the United States just because there is more electronic penetration. There are firms like the firm you refer to as flow traders and others that have more of a hybrid model, in that they have a sales force. They will go to the buyside of the pension funds in Europe and they will get OTC quotes whether it's streaming or whether it's on phone. That’s not our business mode, we’re not going to add a bunch of sales force folks here. No that there is anything wrong with that model it's not consistent with our high margin fully automated electronic market making ethos. The reason I'm excited about Europe, I was just there last week I see our market share growing, I see our penetration rate growing. We’re able to price 100s and 100s of ETFs in Europe and I see one because of people getting comfortable with price discovery but also electronically but also it's significant too coming into place in January of 2017 as well and some of the capital restraints if you will on the traditional market makers the larger dealers in terms of holding capital against OTC positons. I see a trend of further electronification in ETP price discovery in Europe and Virtu is going to be at the center of that, when there is a open competitive electronic marketplace for price discovery of instruments we generally do very well and so we have added resources internally to grow that market and to grow our market share there and so that is a trend that I'm very excited about. So we have a real ETF market making business in Europe, it's fully electronic, it's less people are involved in that than I’ve fingers in my left hand and that’s how it's going to continue to grow and as goes regulatory trends and price discovery trends continue in Europe, we think we’re going to see increased adjusted net trading income in market share for our services.

[Operator Instructions]. And our next question comes from Ian Johnson from Prudential. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

I think just touch on a little bit but I'm just trying to understand, I'm trying to understand your model and why it seems that in sort of equity U.S. equity alone when you look at how you guys have performed in the last quarter and in prior that it seems like you guys are actually out performing from vantage. Some of your competitors maybe those who are you know focused on sort of the wholesale retail businesses, but it seems like in terms of holding up and holding strong even when volumes are lower or volatility is lower, through your capture rate everything it seems you guys outperformed. I'm just trying to understand what is it specifically perhaps about your model that enables you to outperform and then just even some of the more challenging marketplaces.

I think one of the hallmarks of this firm when we started you know [indiscernible] my partner and our Chairman said, you always want to be the inside price and the tightest bid in the offer be we don’t customers and we’re not going to have customers, we’re not going to have the benefits of [indiscernible]. And so we have kept, you saw that our headcount hasn’t changed since December 1, at December 31 of last year our expenses we have controlled so we have kept our expenses very manageable so that we can always be the tightest bid, and the tightest offer in the marketplace and monitor our market share and so really what it is being is sticking to our knitting trying to be the low cost provider if you will bid on the offer. We know that the bid and the offer and the capture rate is going to flex quarter to quarter and frankly day to day and month to month and we’re nimble enough to react to that. We haven't added, we don’t have a sales force we don’t have a significant management infrastructure, you’re talking to everybody other than the 148 people here all have day to day jobs other than myself, I'm the only guy that monitors the whole thing. So it's really sticking to your [indiscernible] being fully automated, keeping your cost structure low and trying to beat the inside price because we’re not the inside price, if we’re not the low cost provider then we don’t get executions because we don’t have the benefits of customer order flow or any other structural advantages. So we need to be that low cost provider and we continue to do it. We have done it since we have started the firm, we are going to continue that, we’re not going to change our basic focus on being the best bid and the best offer for as long as we possibly can, more than that I can't really comment. Obviously the other firms aren't telling me what they are doing and what their models are like and how they interact but as I’ve told people we’re not faster, smarter or anything else, we don’t have any advantages of other people other than the fact that we can control what we can control which is our cost basis of providing that widget the bid and the offering and keeping that as low as consistent as we possibly can. So best answer I can give you and thank you for your support.

And I'm not showing any further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back to Douglas Cifu for any closing remarks.

Thank you very much operator. We appreciate everybody's questions and their support, we recognize that in a quarter to quarter we’re going to see some volatility in our results obviously, we will do our best to try to explain the drivers of our business to our shareholders and to the analyst that have interest in what we do and we look forward to your continuing support and your investments in Virtu. We take it very seriously and we thank you for your time and your attention this morning. Thanks everybody.

Ladies and gentlemen thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude today's program. You may all disconnect. Everyone have a great day.