Serkan Okandan
Analyst · Goldman Sachs
Thanks, Nik, and good morning and good afternoon to all participants. Thank you for joining us for this presentation of our second quarter results. I hope you have all managed to stay safe and well during this unprecedented period for all of us. Q2 saw the full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on activity across our operating markets as lockdowns intensified before some [indiscernible] easing towards the end of the quarter. Our financial performance was impacted as a consequence, although I'm pleased to say that, continued progress on cost control provided a degree offset. Let me go to go straight to the headline numbers, which are summarized here on Slide 5. Group revenue for the quarter declined by 6.9% in local currency terms year-on-year to $1.9 billion. On a reported basis, the year-on-year change in revenue was minus 16.3%, once the negative impact of currency movements amounting to $178 million are accounted for. Lockdowns across our markets explain the scale of this revenue decline, given the requirement to close stores, which significantly constraint top-ups and device sales. The loss of migrant revenues, particularly in Russia, and the sharp fall in roaming income due to travel restrictions also contributed. Together, this more than offset the positive impacts of increased demand for data and fixed line services, which we have seen across our markets since lockdowns were introduced. Despite these headwinds, we were pleased to deliver solid double-digit local currency growth in data revenues during the quarter, up 14.4% year-on-year or plus 5.2% on a reported basis. This reflects the underlying strength in data demand that characterizes our markets as well as the rapid uptake in digital services that lockdowns are encouraging. EBITDA declined by 7.7% in local currency terms to $809 million. On a reported basis, this corresponds to an 18.7% year-on-year decline. Note that for comparative purposes, in our local currency numbers, we have excluded the one-off payment of $38 million booked in Q2 last year in respect to a special compensation received by our subsidiary in Kazakhstan following the termination of our network-sharing agreement in that market. The impact of which I'll illustrate in greater detail in the next slide. Our group EBITDA margin was 42.7% for the quarter, a decline of 1.2% year-on-year or minus 0.4% in local currency terms. Although this is a weaker outcome on both measures, our continued focus on reducing costs offset the margin impact of the quarter's revenue decline. Key here was the planned downsizing all our head to headquarters as well as a reduction in HR-related and G&A expenditure, which together more than offset higher network OpEx from our investment in 4G infrastructure in Russia. Operational CapEx was 9.5% higher in the quarter, which also reflects our investment activities in Russia. This dropped the group's CapEx intensity ratio to 20.8%. More on this when I talk about our financial outlook later. Finally, our leverage ratio stood at 2x net debt-to-EBITDA for the quarter, up slightly from 1.9x in Q2 '19 primarily reflecting the fall in EBITDA we experienced as a consequence of lockdowns. These numbers exclude lease liabilities and express EBITDA on a rolling 12 months basis. And for comparative purposes, exclude last year's payment from Ericsson. Looking at our financial results in greater detail. Slide 6 sets out the impact of Kcell on both reported EBITDA and EBITDA margin in Q2 '19 and illustrates the year-on-year change in each, if this is excluded. This is captured in the 2 adjusted lines in the middle of this table. You will see that the declines in EBITDA and EBITDA margin are minus 15.4% and 0.3 percentage points, respectively, excluding Kcell. On the right-hand side, we have also illustrated the impact of another one-off item that was a feature of the first half of 2019, the $350 million payment from Ericsson, which along with Kcell, we have excluded in adjusted values for reported EBITDA and EBITDA margin. As a reminder, the Ericsson payment was accounted for as EBITDA in Q1 '19 and was received in 2 separate cash payments of $175 million in Q1 and Q2 '19. The group recorded a net profit of $156 million in the quarter, an increase from last year's figure of $69 million. The rise in profits reflects a fall in financial expenses following our refinancing activities and 2 nonoperating gains, reached a combined value of $86 million, namely a revaluation gain on a liability related to our acquisition of Warid in Pakistan back in 2016 and the gain related to a settlement regarding the sale of one of GTH business back in 2014. Moving to Slide 7 and a more detailed breakdown of our revenue during the quarter. The general pattern is one of lower revenues across our operations as lockdowns continued with the exception of Ukraine and Kazakhstan, where growth in data demand enabled us to grow our top line in each market despite these challenges. Weakness in Russia reflected the disruption to our retail channels as a consequence of store closures as well as a new absence of roaming revenues and the smaller migrant customer base because of lockdowns. Pakistan's reported performance was affected by lockdowns as well as the accounting impact of last year's tax regime changes. If we adjust for the latter, Pakistan would have seen revenues rise by 0.5%. You will also see last year's Kcell payment and second quarter FX headwinds as separate components in this waterfall at the left- and right-hand side of the chart, respectively. Turning now to EBITDA on Slide 8. We continue to reduce costs across the group, which enabled us to record a broadly stable margin performance compared with Q2 last year, once the impact of Kcell is adjusted for. Further downsizing of our headquarters function, which was planned before the pandemic and additional savings in HR and staff costs were key contributors here. Together, those more than offset a rise in network-related costs in Russia, which reflects our accelerated network investment there. Without these network expenditures, our Russian EBITDA margin would have been around 300 basis points higher. But we believe making the necessary investments in our networks in Russia now is the right core selection, both for our customers and also for our shareholders. Finally, in Pakistan, it is important to point out the impact of last year's tax regime changes and the reclassification of license amortization expense on our reported performance, which taken together account for around 3/4 of the EBITDA decline there in Q2. Turning now to our capital structure on Slide 9. Our priority is to ensure that we have the capital and liquidity strength to navigate the group successfully during this volatile period. This has meant active management of our debt, including hedging of our U.S. dollar liabilities versus our ruble revenues to insulate us from adverse currency movements. You can see the impact of our hedges on the 2 right-hand pie charts, which show the currency mix of our borrowings, pre and post hedging. As you can see, our ruble liabilities are well matched to our ruble revenues as a result. On a net currency basis, adjusting for our cash holdings, which are shown in the left-hand pie chart, our U.S. dollar and ruble liabilities are broadly similar at 50% and 48%, respectively. Group debt was broadly similar to Q1 levels at $7.6 billion. This was an active quarter for the management of our balance sheet during which we successfully issued RUB 20 billion in senior secured notes at 6.3%, representing the lowest coupon ever for a ruble Eurobond offering. The quarter also saw us negotiate near bilateral loan facilities with 2 of our key banking counterparties in Russia, which has since set to reduce borrowing costs, and increased maturities on over $1.9 billion of debt. Taken together, these activities enabled us to reduce our average cost of debt further to 6.4% at the end of Q2, 100 bps lower than Q2 '19. The group continues to have access to considerable cash and undrawn credit facilities, which together amount to $2.5 billion. We have also managed to mature to all of our borrowings proactively, refinancing near-term maturities and pushing out the average tenor of our debt to 2.8 years compared to 2.3 years at the end of Q1 this year. Moving to Slide 10. The full year EBITDA we experienced in the second quarter resulted in a modest rise in our group leverage ratio, which stood at 2x at the end of Q2, excluding these liabilities. This remains in line with the internal guidance of around 2x we have set ourselves, and reflects what we view as an exceptional quarter's trading given revenues that will inhibit lost because of lockdowns. In summary, the measures we have taken to enhance our balance sheet and secure our liquidity position, places us in a strong position financially to navigate this challenging period. With that, let me hand over to Kaan to discuss our operational performance during the quarter in more detail. Thank you.