Shaun Usmar
Analyst · Bank of America. Please Mr. Ribeiro, your microphone is open
Yes. Caio, thanks for the question. Look, I just answered in the last thing. The focus that we have is you'd appreciate, particular environment is making sure, firstly, that the way that the -- unlike the potential of the portfolio and endowment that we know is there is to firstly get the cost structures and productivities right. So that's happening as table stakes across the board. But the concurrent effort needs to be, what's the right portfolio for us to be able to optimize value for Vale shareholders. And as part of that, we are competing with capital across this portfolio and of course, we're competing with some very lucrative opportunities in iron ore and our priority remains in copper. So specifically to Thompson, it's an operation that we've been in -- we've worked with for over 60 years, generated a lot of wealth, as we've sort of pointed out previously. But the question really is, it's a non-polymetallic opportunity. It's something that is, at the moment, not generating the highest returns when we look at the opportunity set for nickel. So we need to make sure that we don't make the mistake of trying to be all things to all people and spread our resources and our limited capital too widely, which is the reason that we've initiated this process on Thompson. I can say so far, we've had significant interest, the data room opened just yesterday. And as we've indicated, we expect to form a view in the second half. And we have a completely open mind as to what their path may entail in the future, including a potential sale. So this is very much a dispassionate view on how to optimize value. The other one worth noting is who is -- I think we're getting an award in two weeks' time at PDAC is that best discovery of its kind copper-gold discovery in, say, the last 20 years, and it's incredible. And the FEL2 study has just been concluded. It's dealt with a number of the sort of prior technical risks, and that will be unveiled shortly. But it's a logical time as well for that to think about things like partnerships particularly if we've got partners who are able to do -- have great experience in block caving, for example. So that's something that I think you can think about, again, with a view to how do we manage risk, focus on value and optimize the portfolio. To your question of things like Voisey's Bay, others, our short-term focus, we're going to look at everything across the portfolio, particularly at different pricing scenarios. But the best thing we can do for our investors is really, firstly, to get the cost structures and productivities correct, to be able to then unveil their value potential. So that's the focus. We're doing these things concurrently.
Rogério Nogueira: Okay. On the supply side reform, I think as you know, today, the industry is operating at overcapacity with less furnace utilization at about 85% and margins are very low, for rebar producers for HRC producers. Yes, there are two events going on simultaneously for capacity rationalization. The first one that people don't pay much attention to is a consolidation. There is an ongoing consolidation in the Chinese industry. And the second one, as you just talked about, is this potential supply side reform 2.0 which I think we don't know exactly whether this will come or not. As you may recall, the first supply side reform was about 150 million tons of induction capacity that was an easier 1 to do because there was very old capacity, very polluting capacity and back then, it had a significant impact. And this impact is actually referred -- is actually seen in premiums more than in iron ore prices. Look, I think this event will happen. The Rush capacity rationalization will happen being it through consolidation or the supply side reform 2.0. Question is timing.