Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. My name is Brent, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Utz Brands First Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session [Operator Instructions]. It’s now my pleasure to turn today’s call over to Mr. Kevin Powers, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. On the call today are, Howard Friedman, Chief Executive Officer; Ajay Kataria, Chief Financial Officer; and Cary Devore, Chief Operating Officer. Howard and Ajay will make prepared comments this morning, and all three will be available to answer questions during our live Q&A session. Please note that some of our comments today will contain forward-looking statements based on our current view of our business and actual future results may differ materially. Please see our recent SEC filings, which identify the principal risks and uncertainties that could affect future performance. Before I turn the call over to Howard, I have just a few housekeeping items to review. Today, we will discuss certain adjusted or non-GAAP financial measures, which are described in more detail in this morning's earnings materials. Reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures and other associated disclosures are contained in our earnings materials and posted on our Web site. Finally, the company has also prepared presentation slides and additional supplemental financial information, which are posted on our Investor Relations Web site. And now, I’d like to turn the call over to Howard.

Thank you, Kevin, and good morning, everyone. It's great to be talking to you today in my second earnings call as CEO of Utz. I've been in the role now for about six months and it's been a great experience with a lot of learnings that makes me increasingly confident about the future growth. In addition, I'd like to thank Dylan Lissette once again for his help during the transition. And I want to take a moment to congratulate Dylan on his official appointment to Chairman of the Board last week during our annual shareholder meeting. He did a phenomenal job building Utz into what it is today, and the transition couldn't have come at a better time as we position for our next leg of growth. Our first quarter results are a testament to this as our momentum is building as we execute against the long term strategies that have made this great company successful. Organic net sales increased 4% even as we lapsed 21% comparable growth in the prior year. We expanded adjusted gross margins and drove double digit adjusted EBITDA growth, all while continuing to make the necessary investments required to fuel sustainable above category long term growth. Our power brand consumption increased nearly 10% on top of 20% growth last year as we further penetrate our expansion geographies and intentionally rationalize other areas of portfolio. As expected, net sales volumes declined about 6% in the quarter as we lapsed a strong prior year and aggressively optimized our product mix and trimmed non-core private label and partner brands. These actions proactively reduced sales volumes by about 4% but we believe that over time these strategic actions will improve our margin mix and unlock key manufacturing, selling and distribution capacity to support higher growth of our power brands.…

Thank you, Howard, and good morning, everyone. Our first quarter results reflect the strength of our salty snack categories. Despite lapping significant growth in the prior year, we delivered organic growth of 4%, while proactively optimizing our portfolio. In addition, we drove double digit adjusted EBITDA growth as we are executing our margin enhancing programs. I would like to thank the entire Utz team for their contributions to our growth and we remain well positioned for a strong 2023. Turning to our first quarter results in more detail. Net sales were in line with our expectations and increased 3.1% to $351.4 million. Adjusted gross margin expanded 48 basis points to 34.4% and this includes an approximate 90 basis points of negative impact from our IO conversions. Excluding this impact, our adjusted gross margins expanded approximately 140 basis points versus last year and this was our fourth consecutive quarter of year-over-year adjusted gross margin expansion. Our adjusted EBITDA increased by 10.7% to $40.4 million or 11.5% as a percent of net sales. Adjusted net income of $15 million and adjusted EPS of $0.11 per share were both in line with last year largely due to higher interest expense. Moving to the P&L for some additional detail, starting with net sales. Of note, this quarter we have refined our net sales reporting and we have separated mix from price to be grouped with volume. This was done as part of our effort to continually conform our reporting to be more in line with our peers and is consistent with the way we evaluate our business performance. Our net sales growth in the quarter was 3.1%, driven by organic growth of 4%. In addition, total net sales were impacted from the conversion of company owned RSP routes to independent operators, which reduced the…

Thanks, Ajay. It's been an amazing six months since I first came to Utz, and I couldn't be more confident in our long term prospects. Since 2019, we have grown in excess of $600 million in net sales and over $80 million in adjusted EBITDA. Having had the benefit of my time here learning about the business and gaining greater clarity on where our opportunities are, the team and I are pleased to announce that we'll be hosting an Investor Day on December 15th in New York City. During the event, we will go deeper into the catalysts for organic net sales growth and margin expansion, and we are looking forward to sharing more detail about our long term plans. And now operator, we'd like to open the call for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question is from the line of Peter Galbo with Bank of America.

Howard, maybe if we could just start off with the strategic -- just as you start to kind of get into what is seasonally a pretty important period. I know, you've had a large competitor that's kind of talked about seeing a little bit of pressure from private label and maybe using some of their flanker brands as a way to compete against that. We're also seeing just a lot of kind of capacity ads specifically in the pretzel space, maybe more so than other salty snack categories. So if you can just comment maybe on the strategic, how you see the environment playing out over the summer, both on salty and then maybe specifically on pretzels?

I think, the environment at the moment continues to be rational. We've been seeing -- while private label has obviously been active, this sort of happens from time-to-time and it's still off of a relatively small base. I think across our portfolio, we are fortunate because we have a collection of power brands that appeal to a broad base of consumers and then we have some regional brands that can play varying roles up and down the price ladder. So we can go down and sell products that consumers want at pretty much every price point and every configuration that they desire. So I think overall, the power of our portfolio and the environment remained largely as we would've expected and largely we feel comfortable with where we are. As it relates to pretzels, very happy with what's been going on with Zapp’s pretzel launch, the Sinfully-Seasoned twists are performing better than our expectations, trial has been great, repeat has been better than category benchmarks and obviously, the Utz brand continues to be a very powerful item in the portfolio. So competition is a good thing for the category. I think it's healthy and I think it's rational overall.

And Ajay, maybe just a couple of modeling items, if you'll indulge me. Just if you can help us think about the impact from SKU rationalization kind of phasing over the rest of the year. Your inflation outlook, I don't think you changed the band, but just whether or not there's been any movement within kind of that high single digit band on inflation. And then just third and apologies for the three-part question. On the productivity guide, I think you're talking about 4% for this year. I think you did about 2% in the first quarter. So just wanted to understand the ramp there or if that's like a gross to net that we should be thinking about?

So SKU rationalization, we did about 400 basis points in Q1 and that was partly because of the late start in last year. So what you should see is delivery of about 300 basis points for the year and it gets sequentially better or less negative as we move through the year. But we should finish the year about 300 basis points. That's one. And I will remind you, we are trimming a little more than we thought we would when we talked to you in a couple of months back, that enables us to do network optimization and all of the actions that we have taken in the last month or so. And then on your second question around high single digit inflation, we are still expecting high single digit. You are correct that the environment is improving in certain areas, especially around freight. We'll see a little bit of benefit there but largely, not material. High single digit inflation is still the guide, we have sort of baked all that into our planning. And then third question around productivity. The 2% that you see on the EBITDA bridge, that is a percent of sales, that's the EBITDA calc. So when we say 4% that is a 4% of cost of goods. So different base on the map. The productivity expectation has gone up. We have said it three to 4% previously and now we are calling 4%, that's largely because of -- and we are happy to see this, how our productivity capability is building mostly around procurement, freight and other areas of supply chain that Cary and his team are really doing a great, great job building that program.

Your next question is from the line of Michael Lavery with Piper Sandler.

I just want to understand a little bit of the opportunity, maybe specifically for Zapp’s even. Obviously, the SKU [rationalization] and the focus on the power brands, it makes perfect sense and that evolution, in total, can take a little bit of time. But I think it was two years ago, we were sort of -- I was really kind of stunned by the plus 24% that had been and now it's up 57%. Clearly, there's some legs there and it's a differentiated brand and product. With the 40% ACV you mentioned, what's the runway from here? Does that growth drive enough of a selling story to really carry that further? Does it need -- is there any supply constraints? Just help us think about how Zapp’s can grow and what if any limitations there are to that really just being a big driver of [indiscernible]?

Look, I am -- we're very excited about Zapp’s. I think we have a couple of growth legs for this brand and I don't see any meaningful supply constraints beyond the obvious if it had such an explosive runway, but we are enthusiastic about the brand overall. There is an availability opportunity, which this entire portfolio has as we continue to expand our distribution broadly across and then there's consumer desirability aspects to the brand. The brand is attractive and appealing to a wide variety of consumers. It has a distinctive flavor and position. And it's one of those businesses where it stands for something when you see it. So it stands for New Orleans, it stands for excitement, it stands for fun. And all of those things are, from a marketer’s perspective, a dream to be able to build against. So I see a lot of opportunity long term for the business, again, trying to get consumers to opt into the brand, and I think that that will only be amplified as we continue to invest greater levels of [A&C] against it over time.

And just on the supply chain side, it's a little unusual to pair in sourcing and talk about a plant closer at the same time, but I get I think some of the moving parts. Can you just help us understand, maybe one, how big Kings Mountain is that might just have a lot more capacity than then I've appreciated? But is there more -- do you have another runway -- how big is the runway of further in sourcing opportunities? And where's your split is going to be as far as co-manufactured versus in-house, are you getting to the optimal level or how does that go any further?

So no, we've talked about network optimization for some time. One of the reasons we stood up Kings Mountain was to make sure that we had a long term efficient plants to help our business grow. Right now Kings makes pork grinds for us 100% of our pork grinds, we moved that volume from Birmingham a couple quarters ago. The decision to close Birmingham, always a difficult one to close a plant, but that it was -- had an aging infrastructure, expensive to retrofit. So the volume, the remaining volume from Birmingham, which is potato chips and cheese and tortillas, that'll flow into Hanover and ultimately into Kings Mountain. So right now Kings does pork grinds for us, we will be standing up, potato chip capacity, cheese capacity, certainly, and potentially tortilla capacity, as we move forward. So those are investments we'll make. And ultimately Kings will become a very high volume efficient plant for us over the next couple of years. With respect to in sourcing, I think we've got a good base of co-manufacturing partners that are important to us, but we also have the capability to bring things into our plant to better utilize the fixed overhead inside our infrastructure. So we're doing it very prudently. I think, with respect to the [co-man] network, obviously, the biggest piece is On The Border, there will always be a place for [co-man] partners and on The Border, but we've also set up some capacity internally that we can utilize. So we're finding our way toward the right balance and we'll continue to make progress on that.

Your next question is from the line of Rupesh Parikh with Oppenheimer.

So the first thing I want to cover just elasticity, just curious how elasticities are playing out versus your expectations. Are they still better than what you've historically seen? So just any more color there.

Yes, I think you said it well. What we're seeing right now is while there is some elasticity that is showing up in the category, it still remains well below historical levels and is in line with what we would have expected to this point.

And then maybe just one follow-up question. So as we look at adjusted EBITDA margins for this year. I know, earlier in the year you guys said you expect more gross margin expansion for the year. Just curious for any updated puts and takes on both gross margins and SG&A as you think about the adjusted EBITDA margins?

So the expectation is still that super majority of our EBITDA margin expansion is going to come from gross margin area. That is going to be because of the productivity ramp that we are experiencing with a lot of that is in the COGS area. There is a portion of productivity that is accelerated, which is related to delivery costs and freight and all the work that we are doing there, which for us is an SD&A. You saw some of that benefit come through in Q1. So we'll see some full year benefit in SD&A related to that. That said, we still intend to, as we kind of roll through the year and [unstick] some dollars, we intend to invest those dollars in building out capability and investing behind our brand, our consumers, our supply chain, that we have talked about. And most of those investments go in the SD&N area.

Your next question comes from a line of Bill Chappell with Truist Securities.

This is Stephen Lengel on for Bill Chappell. Can you guys kind of help us understand some of the dynamics in the tortilla chips category? I know On The Border was facing some tough mass channel comps. But is there kind of anything to call out to date that kind of gives you more confidence in the brand recovering through the year?

Listen, we feel great about On The Border. It has been a fantastic acquisition for us going all the way back in a business that has been growing quite quickly since we bought it. I think last year when we had a huge significant benefit from distribution and merchandising, specifically in the mass channel, and I know we've talked about this now for a couple of calls, but that is really the story of the numbers right now. Overall, I think, we have a significant amount of growth in front of us on tortilla chips broadly led by OTB as we move forward.

And you guys kind of mentioned some new customers you gained in the quarter. Can you guys help us what's kind of driving that and how it's faring versus some of your internal expectations? Has it kind of come from more distribution or maybe seeing like the innovation and marketing kind of helped drive that better than maybe you would've expected?

So I think our distribution story is largely behind our power brands. We continue to push for broader availability. Obviously, we continue to expand some routes as well, which has been in line with our internal expectations and right on time for our growth story. But broadly speaking with distribution has come consumer trial, we make a great product, consumers love it and once they buy it they tend to stick. And so that's really central to everything that we're doing right now.

Your next question comes from the line of Jim Salera with Stephens.

If I can dig in on some of the subcategory sales, Queso and Salsa sales continue to do very well. No doubt in part because they're kind of relatively new compared to the OTB chips. Do you guys find that those sauce offerings have legs beyond OTB buyers that to say, if somebody buys private label tortilla chips, will they still buy the OTB sauces?

The short answer is, yes. We're finding that those products, both the Salsa and Queso items, which are growing significantly ahead of the category averages, are broadly appealing. And so it's not as if people opt in to OTB and then just by the portfolio of brand offerings, they buy into the dipping occasion and then they look for the dips that they enjoy the most, which obviously, we feel great about the fact that our items are there.

And maybe digging in a little bit on the Zapp's pretzel rollout, I know that's still kind of early days. But do you find that those customers are incremental to the Zapp's brand or they Zapp's potato chip buyers to just see the brand in another form and expand that buy right?

So we find both. The pretzels launch is not only incremental for the Zapp's brand, but it's actually incremental to our portfolio as well. So consumers are encountering the Zapp's brand, either through the potato chip offerings that they find or they may encounter them initially through pretzels, they kind of tend to be both. So it has been incremental for us. Obviously, we know that a flavor forward and exciting brand appeals to a consumer group that we're excited about. So we'll continue to expand on both of those sub cats over time, because we find the enthusiasm for those items to be quite high right now.

There are no further questions at this time. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating. This does conclude today's conference call. You may now disconnect.