Robert Anderson
Analyst · KBW
Okay. Thank you, Luis, and good morning, everyone. Looking at Pages 5 and 6, I would describe the first quarter of 2026 as a highly successful quarter for USCB. The team posted very solid results, which I'm proud to share with you today. The balance sheet, specifically the loan book continues to grow within our stated range of high single to low double-digit growth. Deposits increased this quarter, outpacing loan growth and ensuring sufficient liquidity for future lending. Credit remains solid, and our profitability ratios came in line with internal projections. While we made $0.51 on a GAAP basis, the company recognized a $619,000 income tax benefit in the quarter due to an adjustment of the deferred tax asset relating to 2025. Adjusting our GAAP figures for this 1 item, you'll find the operating or adjusted numbers on Page 6. This includes operating return on average assets of 1.25%, operating return on average equity of 15.92%, efficiency ratio of 52.36%, operating diluted earnings per share of $0.47, NPA to assets of 0.13%, allowance for credit losses stable at 1.16%, total risk-based capital at 14.09% and last tangible book value per share at $12.23. So with that overview, let's discuss deposits on the next page. Average deposits for the quarter totaled approximately $2.4 billion, representing an increase of $212 million year-over-year. On a linked-quarter basis, average deposits declined by $26 million, and that sequential movement requires some context. Late in the fourth quarter, a large commercial plant drew approximately $130 million, which reduced our average balance deposit entering the first quarter. Importantly, this was anticipated and managed outflow. And at the end of the period chart demonstrates, we have since recovered from that decline. On an end-of-period basis, total deposits increased by $149 million during the quarter, highlighting both the resilience of our franchise and our ability to respond quickly to a large discrete plant movements. Equally important is the deposit -- total deposit costs declined 8 basis points quarter-over-quarter to 2.2%, which played a meaningful role in allowing us to keep the net interest margin stable. With ongoing rate volatility, we anticipate deposit costs will stay near current levels, although some competitors are offering higher rates, a relationship-driven deposit base should ensure stable pricing and funding. So with that, let's move on to the loan book. On an average basis, loans increased $46.8 million quarter-over-quarter, which equates to an 8.9% annualized growth rate. Year-over-year, average loans grew 9.6% and well within management's expectations. Net loan growth at the end of the period was $52 million, showing strong production momentum and 2 key dynamics stood out on this. First, A significant portion of our loan production occurred late in the quarter and second loan payoffs occurred early in the quarter. This timing is visible on the chart and translates to a lower earnings impact in the quarter. More specifically on Page 9, gross loan production totaled $188 million during the quarter with $114 million or 60% closing in March. Additionally, [indiscernible] rates were lower for most of the quarter, further influencing loan yield metrics. Correspondent banking loans represented 30% of quarterly production and carried a new loan yield of 5.13%. Excluding this segment, the weighted average yield on the new loan production was 6.2% for the quarter. It's important to remember that these correspondent loans are short term in nature, typically 180 days tied to SOFR and serve a strategic purpose by adding asset sensitivity and optionality to the balance sheet. Additionally, these banks have over $250 million in low-cost deposits with significant wire volume, a very profitable business vertical for USCB. Looking ahead, we expect new loan production yields to remain around these levels. Turning to Page 10. Net interest margin was flat at 3.27% for the quarter. Despite successfully lowering deposit costs, overall margin was impacted by lower-than-expected loan interest income, largely driven by timing and volatility rather than structural pressure. Specifically, interest income was constrained as mentioned before by a combination of factors. Loan closings that occurred late in the quarter, elevated payoffs early in the period and lower SOFA rates throughout much of the quarter. These pressures were partially offset by improvements in deposit pricing and higher yields in the securities portfolio, which helps stabilize our margin. Importantly, we have now expanded the NIM quarter after quarter and the underlying trajectory remains intact. As recently originated loans seasoned into earnings, we expect incremental improvement in interest income, which should support a very modest margin expansion later this year. That said, ongoing rate volatility may limit the degree to which deposit costs can move materially lower from here, and our focus remains on disciplined pricing, balance sheet mix and execution, all aimed at protecting the margin while positioning the franchise for improved profitability. So with that, let me pass it over to Bill to discuss asset quality.