Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. And welcome to UroGen Pharma's Third Quarter 2021 Financial Results and Business Update Conference Call. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Lee Roth, Investor Relations for UroGen Pharma. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Jonathan, Good morning, everyone and once again welcome to the UroGen Pharma's third quarter 2021 financial results and business update conference call. Earlier this morning, we issued a press release providing an overview of our recent corporate highlights and financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2021. A copy of this press release can be accessed on the Investors section of our Web site at investors.urogen.com. Joining me on the call today are Liz Barrett, President and Chief Executive Officer; Dr. Mark Schoenberg, Chief Medical Officer; Jeff Bova, Chief Commercial Officer; and Molly Henderson, Chief Financial Officer. During today's call, we will be making certain forward-looking statements. These may include statements regarding the success and timing of our ongoing commercialization of Jelmyto, planned clinical trials, data presentations, regulatory filings, future research and development efforts, manufacturing capabilities, and 2021 financial guidance, among other things. These forward-looking statements are based on current information, assumptions, and expectations that are subject to change. A description of potential risks can be found in our earnings press release as well as our latest SEC disclosure documents. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and UroGen disclaims any obligation to update such statements. With that, it’s now my pleasure to turn the call over to UroGen’s President and CEO, Liz Barrett. Liz?

Thank you, Lee, and thank you everyone joining us today. Many of you joined us for our spotlight day last week. And we're pleased you're here with us today where we'll discuss our third quarter earnings and highlight recent developments. During the third quarter, we made further progress in both the commercial and clinical development areas of our business. Our commercial team continued to execute on the rollout of Jelmyto in the face of ongoing impacts of the pandemic in the third quarter, especially in certain regions in the U.S. and our development and regulatory teams have made significant progress in our discussions with the FDA regarding UGN-102, as highlighted in last week's event. Jeff will provide more detail on the Jelmyto commercialization. But at a high level, as the Delta variant increase to new COVID cases, patient visits and access declined, causing Q3 patient starts to also decline, which is reflected in the revenue results. As previously reported, we had a strong Q2 that included a small bolus from delayed patients in Q1. Even given the revenue results, we saw a quarter-over-quarter increase in patient enrollment forms in Q3 versus Q2. Importantly, we have experienced accelerated momentum in September and October, marking our two highest-ever months for both new patient starts and patient enrollment forms. Although the $11.4 million of revenue we achieved for the third quarter, was shy of our initial expectations. We remain confident in our ability to finish the year strong. In addition to making progress and driving awareness of Jelmyto in the U.S., we also made progress internationally. We recently launched a named patient program for Jelmyto in five European countries, France, Germany, Switzerland, Austria and the UK. This is a pilot program with a potential to be expanded into other European countries, and will…

Thank you, Liz. The majority of my comments today will focus on the recent change to our clinical trial design for UGN-102, which we were excited to announce at last week's Spotlight Event and our path ahead for UGN-301. As we mentioned that the events after substantive conversations with the FDA, we have begun the process of initiating the new study of UGN-102, which has a more streamlined single-arm design similar to our Phase 2b OPTIMA and our pivotal trial for Jelmyto. The new Phase 3 study will be a multinational, multicenter study enrolling approximately 220 patients. It will evaluate the safety and efficacy of UGN-102 as a primary chemo ablative therapy in patients with low-grade intermediate risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. The design for this new trial will be similar to the OPTIMA trial in that the patient population will have the same clinical characteristics receive the same treatment regimen undergo the same efficacy and safety assessments and qualitative follow-up. Patients will receive six once weekly intra vesicle installations of UGN-102 with the primary endpoint complete response rate at three months after the first installation, and the key secondary endpoint of durability of responses in patients who achieved a CR at the three month assessment. In addition to the design that we believe carries a high probability of success, one of the most significant benefits of this new study design is that we will no longer need to have a comparator arm surgery. The new design is based on time to recurrence, and this should provide greater clarity regarding the duration of the study. We expect to enroll the first patient in this new study in early 2022. And as mentioned, we aim to enroll 220 patients across an estimated 90 sites, and anticipate enrollment in less than a…

Thank you, Mark. I'm pleased to provide you with an update on our ongoing commercial rollout of Jelmyto. Our revenue for the third quarter was $11.4 million. While, our field force is now primarily engaging with physicians in person, as Liz mentioned, during the month of July and August, we experienced a tightening of restrictions in several parts of the country due to the Delta variant. Our third quarter softness was confined to these regions, corresponding with those hardest hit by the COVID surge. We have already seen a rebounding in these areas in September and October, and our sales reps are now mostly back to in-person meetings. In order to get a sense of the continuing impact of COVID and the ultimate timing of the rebound, we recently conducted a survey of 56 urologists, with approximately 75% of our respondents indicating that they believe COVID was the basis for patients delaying treatment for low-grade UTUC, with such delays lasting an average of approximately four months. Overall, physicians remain enthusiastic on the use of Jelmyto, as evidenced by the increases in both the number of activated sites 706 as of November 1, up from 407 on August 1, and the number of repeat accounts or sites treating more than one patient, which increased from 63 on August 1 to 86 on November 1, an increase of 37%. Both of these numbers gives us confidence in continued adoption of Jelmyto, and the physicians’ positive experience in administering it to their patients. Although we have had a quarter-over-quarter decline in revenues from Q2 to Q3, we believe we are largely past the latest COVID wave, and are hopeful that much of the volatility we experienced this year will begin to subside, and we will experience a more normal launch trajectory for Jelmyto…

Thank you, Jeff, and thank you to everyone for joining today's call. UroGen recorded net product sales of Jelmyto for the third quarter ended September 30 2021 of approximately $11.4 million, aggregating to $31.9 million for the first nine months of 2021. This compares to $3.5 million and $3.8 million respectively in the same period of 2020. The year-over-year increase was driven by the launch of Jelmyto in June of 2020. Cost of revenues for the third quarter of 2021 were approximately $1.2 million, resulting in a gross margin of 89% compared to gross margin of 91% in the third quarter of 2020. Cost of revenues for the first nine months of 2021 were $3.6 million resulting in a gross margin of 89%, compared to a gross margin of 91% for the comparable period in 2020. Research and development expenses for third quarter ended September 30 2021 were $11.9 million compared to $10.2 million for the same period of 2020. Research and development expense include $1 million in non-cash share-based compensation expense for third quarter ended September 30 2021, as compared to $1.5 million for the same period in 2020. The overall increase in R&D expense in 2021 compared to 2020 relates to the initiation of a Phase 3 ATLAS study at the end of 2020. Selling, general and administrative expenses for third quarter ended September 30 2021 were $21.6 million as compared to $22.1 million for the same period in 2020. Selling, general and administrative expenses includes $4.5 million at non-cash share-based compensation expense for third quarter ended September 30 2021, as compared to $5.2 million for the same period in 2020. Total SG&A expenses are down slightly in 2021 due to the higher launch related commercial spend in 2020. For the third quarter ended September 30 2021, reported…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Chris Howerton from Jefferies. Your question, please.

Great. Thank you so much for taking the questions. I think two for me. First, with respect to kind of the commercial activities and the progress there. I appreciate obviously, Jeff, that you were mentioning that some of the COVID-19 restrictions and the access to providers was one of the key headwinds. Curious if you could speculate on other factors that may or may not be going on to ensure that there will be continued growth once COVID-19 does hopefully clear. And then the second question I would have is with respect to kind of the R&D expenditures that we can expect for the Phase 3 102 programs. Just curious if you could give us some initial thoughts in terms of either the relative cost to ATLAS or some of the other trials out there that we can estimate, the cost of capital or the cost per the new trial? Thank you.

So Jeff, why don't you take the first question, and then Molly can answer the second question.

Sure. Thanks, Chris. Yeah, we're looking at September and October, being record months to sell. I mean, July and August were patients weren't coming in, as I mentioned, as much as they would be in without COVID. And then when you saw kind of the summer months go by, you saw the rebound. So like, we're just saying similar rebound, good, strong September, strong October, things are continuing. And so yeah, as I've always said to you, as we hope that this is getting back to normal. I just got back from a recent conference, the first live larger group conference in Chicago. They also the urologists there told me their patients are coming back in greater amounts, and have a lot of positive things to say about Jelmyto. So you're seeing accounts coming on board, either for the first time or accounts that have been on board for period of time, and they're finding additional patients that can benefit from Jelmyto.

Okay. Cool. Thanks, Jeff.

Yeah, Chris, and to answer your question on R&D expenses, so at this point, we are still working with a CRO to determine what synergies exist between the two studies. But at this point, we feel comfortable that the cash balance will get us into 2023, which is consistent with the guidance we've provided before as it relates to our spends and cash balance. But I will say I think we feel pretty good. Like I said that there's a lot of synergies between the two studies, so we're really working hard to minimize any incremental costs associated with this switch.

Yeah. And Chris, I'll just make a couple more comments on the commercial and why we are bullish for the rest of the year and into 2022. There were a couple things right at play. One, we talked about the fact that, Q2 had some bolus from Q1 patients not coming in. The other thing we saw in the summer months is as the Delta variant took increases, as Jeff said, there was another lockdown as far as our access, but also fewer patients coming into the office. And we've done an analysis that shows our patient enrollment forms and new patient starts are directly correlated to the increases and decreases in COVID cases. And then, what we also saw was an increase of vacations happening in the summertime, I think up sort of a pent up demand, where some people took time off that hadn't done so. And I think when you put all of those things together and look at kind of what we've seen, as Jeff mentioned, coming into September and October, gives us a lot of confidence that maybe we're getting over that hump, and hope hoping that it doesn't happen again. But we definitely see the reduction in patient and then the increase in patient. So it's really clear that patients aren't visiting the doctor's office, and then you see kind of a bolus, like I said. And as Jeff mentioned, the conference we were just at this past weekend, that's what you're hearing back from physicians now, as they are seeing or more normal, but kind of back to normal patient flow. So, we have patient enrollment forms that kind of give us an early indicator. And we have seen actually, every quarter, despite the fact that Q3 revenue was less than Q2 revenue, we actually had an increase in patient enrollment forms. And it's the transition of those patient enrollment forms from identifying a patient to actually getting a patient started. So those are a couple things that we looked at that give us confidence as we've seen kind of the rebound of new patient starts, but then they continued quarter-over-quarter increase in our patient enrollment form. So Molly, for the first time, we're providing guidance, which just shows you with a $47 million to $51 million reigns that we already know that the Q4 is going to be a significant increase over Q3. So hopefully that helps.

Yeah, it does. Thank you, Liz, I appreciate it. And I'll hop back in the queue. Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Paul Choi from Goldman Sachs. Your question, please?

Thank you. Good morning, and thanks for taking our questions. Maybe one for Jeff to continue on the commercial piece. Jeff, I was wondering if you could maybe just comment on whether you saw majority of the new patient enrollment forms tied to the activation of the additional centers? So is that where the primary growth is going? Or can you maybe qualitatively comment on are you -- the majority of these new patients growth are coming at the existing centers? And then we should expect it to lay down sort of start for these newly activated sites?

Sure. Thanks for the question. And it's a combination of both. What I hear from accounts is, typically, they obviously start out with one patient, they want to see how things go. Logistically, they want to make sure that they're getting reimbursed. The J-code, now I'm hearing 28-days they're getting accurately reimbursed. And then what they'll do is they actively start to look for patients, they talk to their colleagues. So it is a combination of both. As you saw we have a number of activated sites up significantly since the last time we reported. That's a lot of things as well, whether that was a formulary update, a new patient that came on recently. And we will continue to grow that number and accounts. And again, the variant, the vaccine earlier in the year, all sorts of affected how quickly accounts get up and running. And, I'm not surprised to see the latest number of accounts get up and running. You start to see the number of activated accounts go up. But it's a combination of both, I'd say probably a little bit more accounts had to have treated a patient and now they're looking for other patients to benefit from Jelmyto.

Okay, great. Thanks for that color, Jeff. Maybe two more for me, the first is for Molly. Molly, thanks for providing the fourth quarter guidance here for the remaining weeks here. I guess, as you look to next year to ‘22, could you maybe just sort of comment on how you think about the directional slope of the revenue growth for Jelmyto here as we get past the COVID-19 headwinds? And then just one for Mark as well, which is just on terms of the patients were enrolled with regard to ATLAS. Can you maybe just comment on what the regulatory feedback has been with regard to follow-up requirements for that population? And just, what is required potentially from a filing perspective? Thank you very much for taking our questions.

Sure, Hi, Paul. To spread some color on ’22, so we are just, as we said, giving guidance on ‘21. So we're working hard to determine what the best range for ‘22 is yet. So at this point, we're not providing any additional color. But as we look into the beginning of next year, we'll certainly look at the options we’re providing for guidance not just on the revenue, but also on the FX number.

Paul, thanks. We are going to continue to follow the ATLAS patients, because as you can imagine, we're very interested in the safety information that we'll obtain by following these patients. So, even though, the study will be closed, the patients will continue to be followed, we will incorporate those important pieces of information in a subsequent filing.

Thank you very much.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Matt Kaplan from Ladenburg Thalmann. Your question, please.

Hi, thanks for taking the question. Just a follow-up on Paul’s question in terms of maybe Mark. The data that you hope to generate from ATLAS, as the study winds down now that you have transition and pivoted to the new single-arm study. Can you give us a sense in terms of kind of even if you can get some efficacy data from that as well, given the status of the study where you are in it, and your expectation in terms of the number of patients, that you'll be able to generate safety data from?

Matt, thank you. And I don't think we disclosed yet the number of patients was made correctly on this. But we think that the primary value of this population at this point is going to be to provide safety. We have been very fortunate in terms of the enrollment in the trial, as we have previously announced, we are even a little bit ahead of schedule in terms of enrollment. So we think there'll be lots of important safety information. I think it's probably premature unless Liz wants to comment on this to talk at all about what we're kind of seeing or what kind of efficacy information could be gleaned from the experience in analyst.

Yeah, I mean, I think I will add that we absolutely will share the data, including efficacy data from the ATLAS study. So we will have complete response rate. We haven't yet decided how long we will follow those patients. So obviously durability, but absolutely we will have complete response numbers. And, we will be following both the treatment arm as well as the TRBT arm. So, we hope to be able to gather some information from that arm as well, again, a lot around the safety. But we won't be able to do comparison, because obviously we won't have the numbers that we've talked about. It won't be powered at that point. But anything that we can get from there, we expect to one, include that in our filing, and two, we will absolutely share it. So regardless of what it is, we just won't be doing comparisons with our ability to share a complete response rate. And we'll share the durability as it plays out, because as these patients. And we'll share, obviously more in 2022 around the number of patients as we actually still have some patients that are in screening. So, once those patients are through, so we'll make sure that it will be robust, right. We'll have some patients, quite a few patients and we'll be able to share even in 2022 data from the ATLAS study, because obviously now it's no longer be a study where we have to keep it blind. And so we'll be able to share that in 2022 as we enrolled a new study. So hopefully that helps, but we will share all of the information that we can and will start to share that as quickly as we have robust data to share.

Okay. That sounds great. And then just a question on UGN-301 and the planned Phase 1 study that you have going to start in the first-half of the year. What's your sense in terms of how that's a critical for progress, and when you expect to see some initial safety and dose ranging data from that?

So we expect to, as we talked about before, to go first unmanned with our CTLA4, UGN-301. And then the idea is to shift to the combination with the TLR-7, and then also to shift to a multi-armed study with other combinations. So there's a lot that we've got planned and using 301 as the backbone of combination therapy for high-grade disease. And so I think that by the end of ‘22, we'll at least be able to share the initial data that we have, obviously, you don't look at Phase 1 for efficacy, but there'll be potentially some efficacy to share. But, the purpose of the Phase 1 is to, one, ensure safety, and then move to the appropriate optimal combination. So we'll be able to share some of that, at least the initial data on the CTLA4 in 2022, as well.

Great. Thanks, Liz.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Leland Gershell from Oppenheimer. Your question, please.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Just want to clarify, so the data from ATLAS that we eventually will see and will be included as part of the submission that will not have any role in terms of supporting the efficacy for registration purposes? In other words, the FDA can rely entirely presumably on the new Phase 3 trial. Just want to clarify that Mark. Thank you.

That's correct. Absolutely. That's correct.

Great. And the same thing as before, but is there any expectation when we might see the initial cuts from ATLAS? Could that be sometime in ‘22?

Yes, we'll absolutely be able to share CR rate, because we'll have all of the patients through at least the three month mark. So we'll be able to share at least complete response data in 2022.

All right, terrific. Thanks for taking the questions.

Thank you.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude the question-and-answer session of today's program. I'd now like to hand the program back to Liz Barrett, for any further remarks.

Thank you. Thanks, Lee and thanks everybody for the questions. I hope that you see that, what we see and the potential of where we're headed with UroGen. We're excited about 2022 getting over the hump. We're very bullish on the rest of the remainder of 2021. And, having that great momentum going into 2022, we continue to get very positive feedback working through logistics. And hopefully with the pandemic behind us, we can see the continued momentum, not only from a commercial standpoint, but as you've heard the simplification of the one arm study for UGN-102, being able to talk to the FDA and work closely with the FDA, gain agreement on that, be able to share the data as we continue to generate data for ATLAS and then 102, and then launch our first in man study with the combination in 2022, as well. So, an exciting time for us, as we continue to make progress both from a commercial standpoint and also from a clinical development standpoint. So appreciate all of your support and time. And we'll talk to you guys soon. Thanks. Take care. Bye.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Good day.