Thank you for standing by and welcome to the Upwork First Quarter 2022 Financial Results. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to Evan Barbosa, Vice President of Investor Relations. The floor is yours.

Thank you. Welcome to Upwork’s discussion of its first quarter 2022 financial results. Leading the discussion today are Hayden Brown, Upwork’s President and Chief Executive Officer; and Jeff McCombs, Upwork’s Chief Financial Officer. Following management’s prepared remarks, we will be happy to take your questions. But first, I’ll review the Safe Harbor statement. During this call, we may make statements related to our business that are forward-looking statements under federal securities laws. These statements are not guarantees of future performance but rather are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results could differ materially from expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements regarding the current and future impacts of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and our decision to suspend business operations in Russia and Belarus and the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and current and future impacts of actions we have taken in response to Russian’s invasion of Ukraine and the COVID-19 pandemic are forward-looking statements and related to matters that are beyond our control and changing rapidly. For a discussion of the material risks and other important factors that could affect our actual results, please refer to the SEC filings available on the SEC website and on our Investor Relations website as well as the risks and other important factors discussed in today’s shareholder letter. Additional information will be set forth in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 when filed. In addition, reference will be made to non-GAAP financial measures. Information regarding a reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP measures can be found in the shareholder letter that was issued this afternoon on our Investor Relations website at investors.upwork.com. As always, unless otherwise noted, reported figures are rounded in comparisons of the first quarter of 2022 or to the first quarter of 2021. All measures are GAAP unless cited as non-GAAP. Now, I’ll turn the call over to Hayden.

Thanks, Evan and thank you all for joining us today for our first quarter 2022 earnings call. The first quarter presented no shortage of global uncertainty and conflict and it also demonstrated the strength of Upwork’s business as we continue to execute on our strategy to innovate, evangelize and scale the world’s Work Marketplace. In the first quarter of 2022, GSV grew 27% year-over-year to over $1 billion and revenue grew 24% year-over-year to $141.3 million. This is the first time our quarterly GSV has hit $1 billion, marking an important landmark in our growth. As we continue to build recognition of Upwork in our offerings, we are also thrilled to be recognized on the Time 100 Most Influential Companies list. Our continued momentum was marked by milestones spanning product, marketing and sales. Our product innovation and scaling continued with the launch of Project Catalog consultations, the rollout of boosted proposals and availability badges to all talent, and the announcement of the simplification of our pricing and packaging for non-enterprise clients. We also launched improvements to in-contract messaging between clients and talent, furthering their ability to build long-lasting relationships on our Work Marketplace. On the marketing side, we continue to be laser-focused on raising awareness of Upwork with customers and prospects and are encouraged by early signals we are seeing from our brand marketing investments. This includes a 20% increase in overall website traffic and 24% increase in client registration from the levels in the third quarter of 2021 prior to our brand marketing investments ramping. On the sales front, we delivered another strong quarter with new enterprise client deals up 33% year-over-year and enterprise revenue growing 57% year-over-year. We operate a global business in more than 180 countries and the Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24 impacted our…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Eric Sheridan with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Thank you so much for taking the questions. Maybe two if I can. Last quarter, we talked a lot about investments you wanted to make against the long-term opportunity set you see. Can we revisit that and understand better what you are seeing in terms of the marketing and brand investments you are making in the business today and how we should be thinking about the yield over the return on those investments over the long run? And similar, with respect to continuing to ramp the sales force and the productivity you are getting from the sales force in the years ahead? Thanks so much.

Sure. We believe that the time continues to be right now to really lean into the opportunity we have in the ecosystem. As you look out across our client and talent opportunity, we know that we still have the single-digit unaided brand awareness and yet customers are finding more and more value on our platform everyday. We see that with the increasing in GSV per client. We see that in our enterprise sales team continuing to actually exceed their goals in terms of the number of new accounts landed per quarter and per year. So, we know that the demand is there and we know that we are getting really good – better everyday actually at serving that demand with our Work Marketplace. And yet the vast majority of customers still don’t know about us. We have seen some really nice promising signs. I mentioned the 20% increase in client traffic, 24% increase in registrations from clients relative to Q3 of last year before we started the brand investment. So, we think that the opportunity is both there and it’s now in this critical time around the war for talent and we are seeing the results in terms of the numbers starting to peak through, although it is definitely early days and we know that some of these investments around brands, for example, will take multiple quarters to fully see and measure the ROI around. Jeff might want to provide a little bit more on some of the – when we are thinking about the governance framework on that investment.

Sure. I’d add on the sales front, we are also executing well against our hiring plans. As we indicated before, we expect to double the size of the account execs by end of 2022. We are well on track to do that. And on the brand front, we are going to take the same approach that we have with other areas of investment that we are looking to make sure that we deliver an IRR comfortably above our WACC. And obviously, brand has its own unique challenges that caused the ability to do that to be a little bit more elongated, but we are bringing that same mindset that we want to make sure we drive unaided brand awareness and that converts to real business outcomes and monitoring the early signals that we can so that we can pivot and optimize as quickly as we can, but we also need to bring patience to the investment opportunity.

Thank you.

Thank you. Your next question comes from Bernie McTernan with Needham & Company. Please go ahead.

Great. Thank you for taking the questions. Maybe just to start on guidance. I was just wondering if you could maybe talk through the moving pieces of providing the revenue guidance for the year but not the EBITDA guidance, what we should be thinking about in terms of a range of possible outcomes when it comes to costs.

Sure. So with respect to our annual revenue guidance, first off, the rest of the business outside of the impacted region continues to perform well. So the change from our previous guidance to our new guidance is purely a reflection of the impact of the war in Ukraine. There is two key dynamics that we look at that kind of will influence where we net out. One is the level of substitution that we see of contracts that were in place with talent in the region, and if they are for Russia and Belarus, to the extent those preventers don’t move outside the region, what happens with the client activity in the future. And we don’t yet have data. We will get better data once the May 1 termination date occurs. That may take months or quarters to really get a good sense for how clients will respond, but that’s the first big variable. The second is what happens with respect to Ukraine. Obviously, it’s a volatile dynamic and we have limited visibility into that. But once we have substitution data from Russia and Belarus, we will be able to hone in, hopefully, on the potential range of outcomes for Ukraine and narrow our revenue guidance in the future. With respect to EBITDA, we just thought it was too early to provide an update on our guidance there. We will continue to monitor our investments. As we get a better sense for the substitution dynamic and are able to narrow the revenue outcome, we will likely update the EBITDA or reinstate the EBITDA guidance at that point in time. Once again, we’re committed to achieving a long-term EBITDA target of 30% to 35%, and we will have good discipline on our investments in the interim. Thanks, Bernie.

Understood. And then just a follow-up. Some encouraging commentary on the new client acquisition exceeding record levels in the first quarter. I was just hoping you could dive into what’s driving this, whether it’s project catalog, the macro, the brand marketing coming through. And then on the other side of it, the net adds weren’t at record levels, so what you’re seeing on the churn front and if churn to maybe peak in the first half of the year and get better in the second half of the year. Is that the right way to think about it? Thank you.

Sure. I’ll start. So with respect to the record acquisition, I think it is the combination of the various things you mentioned, so both performance marketing performing well, brand marketing kicking off, catalog representing a larger portion of new acquisitions than a year ago or whatnot. And so we’re very pleased to see that we achieved that record number. The deceleration in the year-over-year growth rate of active clients is a bit of a tricky one primarily because that’s a trailing 12-month metric. And so that deceleration is largely driven by the strength in the acquisition that we had a year ago. Essentially, you have a larger portion of the denominator that is from newly acquired clients, and the churn rate of new acquired clients is always higher than it is for tenured accounts. So because it represented a larger mix a year ago and in that denominator, the acquisition strength that we saw a year ago is creating a headwind in our overall growth rates now. The good news is that the churn levels for those different cohorts have – are absolutely operating within normal historical ranges, and it’s just a function of that kind of mix shift. Thank you very much.

Understood. Thanks, Jeff.

Thank you. Your next question comes from Maria Ripps with Canaccord. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks so much for taking my questions. First, maybe just a follow-up on your guidance. So understanding that it’s still too early to know the level of substitution for contracts in Russia and Ukraine and I appreciate all the color there, but could you maybe talk to us about sort of what kind of assumptions around the impact are broadly embedded in your Q2 and full year outlook?

Sure. So at a high level, we really looked at a range of potential outcomes both for the substitution that we could see in Russia and Belarus and then what might happen in Ukraine. And those went into – a variety of those scenarios went into informing both what we might see on each of those. As we mentioned, we are really pleased that while after we saw a drop in the business activity in Ukraine at the start of the war, it bounced back to 90% of pre-invasion levels. It’s really hard to predict exactly where that goes from here. So we just looked at a variety of assumptions to inform both that and the substitution. And the other point I want to echo again is we – while we have very limited data right now on the substitution front, we think that we will begin getting more as soon as the contracts terminate on May 1, but it may take those months and quarters depending on how clients respond. Part of the platform is that clients have great relationships with these freelancers and they are not quick to move to new ones necessarily. They have vested interest in those relationships, and so just like we saw with our existing freelances on the platform. So we don’t know how long it will take, but we imagine that we will be in a much better position on next quarter’s call to provide more context on that.

Got it. That’s very helpful. And then maybe can you talk about your WMSD business outside of the region? And for those – for the other 75% of that business, have you seen the engagement per freelance increasing? Do those freelancers have the capacity to take on more projects? And sort of how are you thinking about your ability to attract more talent across weapon mobile in other regions?

Sure, Maria. I can jump in on that one. We’ve seen a lot of strength in that WMSD category. I think the fact that our fill rates didn’t move down at all even though a substantial portion of talent – all of the comps from Russian, Belarus became essentially invisible after we made the shift earlier in the quarter, I think that really speaks to the fact that talent from all over the world are very active in that category, all over Europe, Asia, U.S., etcetera. So we’ve seen our clients be really successful in continuing to hire at the same rate in that category, find the quality of talent in that category that they were looking at before the conflict even today. So that’s, I think a microcosm there. And then stepping back and looking at talent globally, our business has always been driven by word of mouth on the talent side. We don’t do any direct marketing to talent and yet we still have essentially a surplus of talent relative to client demand on the platform because I think more and more, we see the secular trend where people want to be working flexibly. They want control over their careers. Entrepreneurship is of high interest, and our platform offers a great solution for them to really build those businesses. So our focus is how do we really build that momentum with more client awareness and close that gap on the awareness side through brand marketing and other investments to bring more of that demand to the talent we have on the platform because that’s really where the constraint is in the business. We don’t – we’re not really constrained on the talent side even today, even having gone through that conflict thus far.

Got it. That’s very helpful. Thank you, both.

Thank you. Your next question comes from Marvin Fong with BTIG. Please go ahead.

Hi, good evening. Thanks for taking my questions. Excuse me. My first one, again, just on guidance because I think investors are obviously keenly focused on that. So could you just kind of discuss further – it sounds like your adjustment to guidance is entirely due to Ukraine and that region, as you said. So basically, are you – how confident are you that the rest of the world business activity will stay firm given all the stresses and monetary tightening? All that sounds like a lot of investors are just broadly concerned about the impact of that. What’s sort of your view relative to your guidance about why you’re so confident that that’s going to hold in there? And then I have a follow-up.

Sure. So we haven’t yet seen any dynamics play out on the rest of the business. We’ve been closely monitoring the region on the periphery of the war zone, and nothing notable to comment on – in terms of clear impact to that region, but we will continue to pay attention to that because obviously, it does represent a risk. And the issues that you flagged are also potential risks to the business. Now we have seen in the past that our business often does well when there is kind of disruption in the economy. Whether it is an acceleration of the economy or a deceleration in the economy, our value prop resonates with clients and freelancers to help them either expand more quickly or have a more flexible workforce to be able to deal with a contraction. Now clearly, as things play out, we will continue to update guidance, but we’re not seeing any dynamics right now that cause us to change our forecast for the rest of the business.

Great. That’s great to hear, Jeff. And I have a follow-up on what you were saying about what’s on the shareholder letter about Project Catalog, 47% of clients made a repeat purchase and of those, only 2% on the talent marketplace 50% bought another Catalog Project. Did either of those – any of those metrics surprise you? Or were those in line with your expectations? How should we think about that? Thank you.

Thanks, Marvin. I think these are just – these aren’t metrics we’ve necessarily been forecasting even internally are driving towards but rather represent outputs, we’re really happy to see to validate our overall hypothesis of why a single Work Marketplace where customers can come and get work done in a variety of ways through Project Catalogs, through Talent Scout, through our Talent Marketplace, graduating up to our enterprise offerings. What we’re really seeing with those metrics is customers find that success, in this case, through one of the newer products that we’ve launched, a new entry point for them and then continuing to be very successful in both repeat usage, adoption of other ways of working, etcetera, which we believe when we launched the strategy 12, 18-plus months ago, we believe that this would drive that type of unlock for customers. And it’s still early, but we are starting to see that with the behavior that we shared, and we will continue building out that single Work Marketplace where we can serve the very heterogeneous needs that customers have across the different ways that they need to transact and buy services and form these different relationships.

That’s great. Thank you, Hayden. I appreciate it.

Thank you. Your next question comes from Matt Farrell with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Congratulations on the extremely strong execution in the quarter as you navigated all the moving pieces. On the enterprise side, another impressive set of logos this quarter. What are some of the common themes that you are seeing on why more and more enterprise clients are adopting Upwork? And do you think the current macro and geopolitical environment is a potential tailwind for enterprise adoption moving forward?

Thanks, Matt. Yes, I’d say the commentary in terms of what we’re seeing on team is the broader secular trend in favor of more flexible work models. The talent war that companies are really struggling with in terms of running into dead ends with their existing legacy ways of sourcing talent, operating with talent, their full-time employee model, staffing models, etcetera, those are just run one of the themes for so many of our customers, and they are waking up to the fact that both to find the workers they need today and to modernize their capabilities to really keep up with where the industry is, they need a switching like ours in their toolkit. And so that has really been resonating. And our team has been evolving their playbook in terms of landing those accounts in a really sophisticated way. So that’s been great to see on the one hand. To your question about the macro environment, I don’t think that a lot of our enterprise customers are telegraphing to us that the war in Ukraine is really changing any of those strategies specifically. I think what the overlay is they really need a trusted partner. Their forefront in their minds is safety, security, reliability, having a partner for these important talent strategies that they know can create that business continuity with and for them. And so I think that’s where our leading position in the market, the solutions that we have at every layer of our stack around vetting talent, around having work protections and guarantees for all parties, like there is just so much that’s embedded in our model, the trust and safety approach that we have. All of that comes into play when customers are – still need to pursue these growth strategies and find talent but are recognizing that the ecosystem and the world is maybe more fraught and more challenging today than it was in the past. So I think that’s where it both brings to the fore some of our messaging and our solutions has been relevant in terms of shining a light on that one that’s relevant for our customers.

Thanks. And maybe a follow-up for Jeff. On the EBITDA line, you mentioned that there was – in the shareholder letter that there was a push out in some brand spending. Was that driven by the crisis itself? Or was there another dynamic going on that caused the push out? And as we think longer-term, could you remind us just some of the major drivers to push the EBITDA line from current levels to your long-term target over the next couple of years? Thanks.

Thanks, Matt. Sure. So we mentioned that $6 million of brand spend was pushed from Q1 to outer periods. And that wasn’t related to the war. It was really – we hired our new CMO in Melissa Waters in early Q1. We had a plan in place before then. She’s coming in and putting her fingerprints on that plan and just moving dollars around and activities around – in line with that overall $80 million investment for this year. In terms of the long-term EBITDA margin target and the key levers to get there, so they are really across the board. So from a cost of revenue perspective, we believe that we will be able to continue to drive improvements across a number of fronts, whether that’s payments, hosting, customer support, why now we should be able to get leverage in a number of those key areas over the long run. With the payment – with the pricing change that we made this time, we will start to make some progress against that, we believe, depending upon what clients choose, whether or not they are going to choose ACH or credit card. Within G&A, we will continue to bring down that. As a percentage of overall revenue on a non-GAAP basis, I think it’s 13%, 14% right now. We believe we can get that down to 8% to 10% over the long run just by driving greater efficiencies. In sales and marketing, I think right now, maybe we are at 40%-ish. We continue to believe there is really attractive opportunities to invest there, and we want to do that for as long as we possibly can. And once we have kind of – not exhausted, but over time, as we lean into that, the revenue will accrete to those investments and we will be able to bring down the overall investment level to closer to the 25% level. And then product and development, we are the leader right now. We are able to invest more than others in building out the work marketplace, which provides us a great platform to be able to provide more value to clients and freelancers. We want to continue to be able to do that, but over time, we will be able to gain efficiencies there as the revenue grows. Thanks for the question, Matt.

Your next question comes from Andrew Boone with JMP Securities.

Hi, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. I have got two on product. So, the first, just with booster proposals going GA, and understood we are just a couple of months in here, but can you talk about the early adoption that you are seeing from freelancers and how they are using the product? And just what’s the expectation as that relates to the model? And then secondly, the new marketplace pricing plan, what did the new features unlock for buyers? How do we think about the financial impact as you guys move to the plan? And just talk about the strategic change of why you guys made that decision? Thanks so much.

Sure. On the side of these proposals, talent has been really excited about this feature because it’s clearly driving higher win rates for those that end up winning those options and getting into the top of the results in our tracking system. So, the reception has been really positive. I think awareness is frankly still building amongst the full talent population now that we are rolling that out. So, it’s still early and we will be continuing to iterate on that product, but definitely seeing really great signs in terms of the results and the feedback from talent so far. On the side of the pricing structure, it was really research with our customers that revealed many of them with value and benefit from the features that have been behind that table of the client plus plan. And some of the examples of that are, number one, access to premium talent, which is not as evident and easy to do without that premium plan. Advanced freelancer search is another capability that was in the plus plan in the past. The ability to invite up to 30 freelancers to your job post was another one. And then there were a bunch of features kind of related to scaling your usage of effort, both your Upwork team and with your team members in our company, so things around reporting options, having coworker teammates and permissions that were much more sophisticated in their account setup, activity codes for organizing work and then drawing the reports related to that. So, this was a whole package of features that essentially really help clients at various points in the journey and adopting Upwork and scaling Upwork and understanding the full benefits and the way that they can really make this a core part of their talent and work strategy. And what we saw was clients were not necessarily ready to jump in and pay the upfront subscription to get access to those features, but instead, one of those features and basically to pay as you go through the take rate and as they basically adopt and work with talent on the taker side and to the client fees that they themselves are paying. So, with that shift, we are better able to get more of these critical premium features that drive adoption, usage and scaling for the clients, at the same time as just monetizing it differently through more of the fee structure on the back end rather than upfront with a gating around the paid subscription.

And a few additional comments. The benefits from the pricing model were reflected in our – both our previous guidance. We have been working on this for a couple of quarters and obviously is reflected in our current guidance. And at least qualitatively, we expect that it will increase take rate. As we have alluded to in the past, it’s one of the contributors to that over time and then should also increase gross margin as – or it should be a driver of a higher gross margin because of the – some clients will be choosing the ACH option, which will bring down payment costs there. And other clients will be choosing the 5% plan, which will increase margin as well.

Thank you.

Thank you. Your next question comes from Rohit Kulkarni with MKM Partners. Please go ahead.

Thanks. A question on take rate and new pricing plan, to the extent you can say and also the most recent trend in marketplace take rate, so three things into one. So, marketplace take rate sequentially increased. That’s encouraging. Any specific call-outs there and how sustainable that is? And then on the pricing plan, how should we think about the trend line in the take rate, or what is the direct impact on the change in pricing and the take rate and the mix of GSV per client that you anticipate?

Sure. So, on take rates and the marketplace take rate, you saw a quarter-over-quarter increase, but relatively flat over the last couple of quarters. The dynamic that we have had that’s been driving the take rate decline over the last, I don’t know, five-ish quarters or so has really been the very positive signal of clients spending more with the existing freelancers that they are working with, that appears in our client spend per active clients metric and as a result of the age into the lower price points on the – on our pricing tier. But that trend, we expect, will likely continue. We do think that the upward pressure on take rate will come from growth of enterprise, growth of Talent Scout, growth of Project Catalog as well as this pricing change. We are not breaking out the exact impact that we are forecasting from the pricing change. And part of it, it will need to get data to figure out how much – what are clients choosing to do. So, clients that were on the plus plan or the basic plan, are they choosing to pay an ACH or not, and that will impact the numbers a bit. But our assumptions on all that are baked into the guidance that we had as well as the previous guidance from before. Was there another question, Rohit?

Yes. Just on guidance, again, on kind of – obviously, you are reinstating the guidance. So, maybe just double-click on what you have seen in the last six weeks that gives you more confidence of the visibility into the year? And then on the guidance, the reduction is definitely less than 10%. So, given the exposure that you have talked about in Ukraine and Russia, it has been around that. So perhaps, are you assuming any subscription already, or does that imply strength in the rest of the business that you are actually raising guidance for the rest of the business in some way. So, anything you can give on that.

Excellent. Yes, the forecast for the rest of the business largely remains the same versus our prior guidance that had been pulled. Really, the vast preponderance of the impact of the reduction from our prior annual guidance is due to the impact of the war in Ukraine. And what we have seen over the last – since the war broke out is that activity in Ukraine has been able to continue surprisingly to remain at very high levels and a testament to the – to both the folks in that country as well as the platform’s ability to meet their needs and supporting their families. And so that’s been operating at about 90% the level that it was before the invasion started. Now, it’s hard to know where that will go. And so our guidance assumes a range of outcomes in terms of potential impact to that level. And on the substitution front, with respect to Russia and Belarus, our guidance also assumes a range of substitution. And as I said before, we don’t have great data at this point in time just because the contracts – certainly some contracts have ended and some of those clients have moved to new client, to new freelancers, but the majority of them will terminate on May 1st, and we will start to get data in May as to what is the activity that we are seeing from them. And then we will be able to – hopefully, after a few months, maybe a couple of quarters, we will be able to have a much better perspective on how that will play out. Thanks Rohit.

Thanks Jeff.

Your last question comes from Brent Thill with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Hayden, many investors are taking into their forecast a weakening global macro environment, and many ask us how Upwork can sustain any downturn. If you could remind us all in the last downturn, how – what kind of behavior you saw from that side?

Sure, Brent. I would say the macro environment certainly is unclear what’s going to happen exactly. But if we look at data points such as how our business performed in 2008, that was a really strong period for us. And I think that really was evidence of the flexibility that our platform offers on both sides. I would say where we are at this moment is the flexibility around working opportunities for talent is so much more relevant and sought-after, coveted by talent than ever before. And that’s if people are laid off, if they are looking for different opportunities, our platform can certainly be a great source of opportunity for people regardless of the conditions that may come up. On the client side, our clients are always looking for a variety of things. They are looking for access to talent. They are looking for flexibility in their business model that they can really build in, in a long-term way, cost savings and efficiency in terms of how they deploy those resources and how quickly they can spin them up and spin them down. And again, in a tighter economy and kind of more uncertainty, we have seen in the past and we would anticipate that those value propositions again become extremely relevant as they are already. But again, just shine a light even more on why those are so critical and viable for customers going through a tougher time. So, based on those things, based on the performance we saw through the pandemic, which also had echoes of similar time of uncertainty and customers walking into solutions that give them more options and more flexibility through those kinds of uncertainty, we feel good that the business is positioned well with fundamental attributes that really serve customers through any economic condition.

That’s great. And just a quick follow-up on the product roadmap, how are you keeping the engineering product roadmaps on track even 30 staff is in those affected regions? What’s the secret sauce here?

Yes. First of all, I am just so proud of how our team has executed and operated through the last eight-plus weeks. I mean starting with before the conflict late last year and early into Q1, preparing for a potential outcome such as what we saw we were hoping that wouldn’t happen, we sent e-mails to customers in January saying we are here to help you get ready. Anyways, the team has just done a phenomenal job. And as it comes to our internal operations, we have done a couple of things. One is we have been really successful in relocating a large number, 75% or so, of our Russian and Belarusian talent out of Russia and Belarus so that they can continue working with us without any disruption. And that’s a huge testament to their commitment to Upwork and the success that our teams have had in making that happen in a very short timeframe. Secondarily, as it pertains to our talent base in Ukraine and our many team members there, I mean these folks have done an incredible job, really wanting to refocus on work. This is, in some ways, an outlet for them in a trying time where they can kind of have something that feels more normal. And they have been engaging at basically the same levels now we are back to the operational capacity with our Ukrainian talent basically that we were at before the conflict, which is really incredible. But at the same time, we are doing a lot to make sure that we are bolstered in the event of further disruptions or changes in the environment. That includes, number one, you might not be surprised using our own platform to source talent as needed to serve a variety of needs and also have extra staff available in the event that other team members are impacted by the conflict and end up being offline for periods of time or other types of effects. So, with all of that together, I think what I have seen is our team incredibly capable of managing an unprecedented disruption, delivering new customer value and features throughout the entire timeframe and coming out stronger, which makes me so excited about what we are going to do for the rest of the year.

Thanks Hayden.

Thank you. And with that, we end Q&A, and I pass the call back to Evan Barbosa, for his final remarks.

On behalf of the entire Upwork team, thank you for joining us today, and thank you for your interest in Upwork. If you need any clarifications or have any follow-up questions, please do not hesitate to reach out to me at investor@upwork.com. This concludes our call.

Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect.