Good morning and thank you for holding. Welcome to Rent-A-Center's Third Quarter 2014 Earnings Release Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Following today's presentation, we will conduct a question-and-answer session (Operator Instructions). As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded, Tuesday, October 21, 2014. Your speakers today are Mr. Robert Davis, Chief Executive Officer of Rent-A-Center; Mr. Mitch Fadel, President and Chief Operating Officer; Guy Constant, Executive Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer; and Mr. David Carpenter, Vice President of Investor Relations. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. David Carpenter. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Stephanie. Good morning, everyone and thank you for joining us. You should have received a copy of the earnings release distributed after the market close yesterday that outlines our operational and financial results that are made in the third quarter. If for some reason you did not receive a copy of the release, you can download it from our Web site at investor.rentacenter.com. In addition, certain financial and statistical information that will be discussed during the conference call will also be provided on the same Web site. Also, in accordance with SEC rules concerning non-GAAP financial measures, a reconciliation of EBITDA is provided in our earnings press release under the statement of earnings highlights. Finally, I must remind you that some of the statements made in this call, such as forecast growth in revenues, earnings, operating margins, cash flow, and profitability, and other business or trend information, are forward-looking statements. These matters are, of course subject to many factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements. These factors are described in the earnings press release issued yesterday, as well as our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014. Rent-A-Center undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. I'd now like to turn the conference call over to Robert. Robert?

Thank you, David and good morning everyone and thank you for joining us. I will be providing a brief high-level overview and update to our multi-year plan as presented in our recent February Investor Day. Mitch and Guy will then provide more detail on our operations and financial results for the quarter. Overall, given where we began the year and the challenge we have continued to face from a macro perspective, I am genuinely pleased with how we performed this quarter. We entered the quarter coming off a disappointing Q2. But as expected, the rollout of smartphones during the third quarter had a positive influence on the core U.S. business performance. In fact, we posted customer gains in both August and September in the quarter, to close the quarter with some momentum. It has been quite some time since that has occurred during the seasonally softer third quarter. Couple that core store performance with Acceptance Now continuing to deliver consistently strong same store sales growth and as a result our company wide consolidated same store sales were positive for the second quarter in a row at 1.9%, contributing to us reporting earnings that met expectations. However, we cannot ignore the macroeconomic pressures that continued to burden our financially constrained consumers. Therefore, we must maintain our urgency to execute on the transformation we outlined in February with a focus on operational and infrastructure initiatives such as implementing a new flexible labor model for our core U.S. source, developing a new supply chain, formulating a customer focused value based pricing strategy and introducing exciting new technologies to our Acceptance Now growth engine. Now, while all of our strategic initiatives are very important to our success, I will highlight the four key initiatives just mentioned. As many of you realize, historically, our earnings…

Thanks, Robert. I'd also like to add my gratitude and appreciation to Dave for the last 12 years and wish him nothing but the very best in retirement. David, it has been a great pleasure to work with you; it really has. And good morning to everyone on the call. Overall, we are pleased with the trends we’re seeing in our business segments. Our 1.9% same-store sales number was buoyed by almost 26% comps in our Acceptance Now business, while our core business same-store sales continued to improve on a sequential basis. Robert mentioned positive customer growth in the core business in August and September, something very hard to accomplish in this summer months in this business. Let me add to that. Delivery trends have also run positive on a year-over-year basis in September and so far in October. Therefore we continue to expect same-store sales to continue to get better on a sequential basis. We’ve seen this improvement in almost all of our product category. So our newest category smartphones has obviously helped. You will recall we launched smartphones nationwide in July, offering some of the world’s best phones along with unlimited talk, text and data with a flexibility and convenience of no contract service in our rent-to-own agreement. In fact we receive the latest and greatest phones at the same time as other national retailers. By way of example, we launched the Samsung Note 4 last week on the same day it was launched nationwide at retail. Our collections in the core for the quarter were above what we expected them to be for our seasonally tougher summer months. Our rent-to-own skips instalments came in for the quarter at 3.4%. Although there was 30 basis points higher than last summer, about two-thirds of the increase was due to…

Thank you, Mitch and good morning everyone. This morning I will walk you through our financial results for the third quarter, after which we will open up the call for your questions. I would also like to mention that as I refer to our third quarter performance either this year or versus a year ago, all numbers will be presented on a recurring basis, excluding special items. As outlined in the press release, total revenues were $769.5 million, which represents a 2% increase, driven by revenue increases in our Acceptance Now and Mexico segment, offset by a revenue decrease in our core U.S. retail segment, partially due to the 150 store consolidation we completed in the second quarter. Same store sales increased 1.9% in the third quarter as compared to a year ago, driven by increases of more than 25% in both our Acceptance Now and Mexico businesses, partially offset by a 3.6% decrease in our core U.S. retail segment. Our total U.S. same store sales when you include all of our U.S. formats was up 1.4% versus a year ago, despite the challenging retail environment. We are encouraged that our third quarter same store sales numbers represent a sequential improvement of 130 basis points versus the year-over-year change seen in the second quarter. This improvement was assisted by our national rollout of smartphones. And on a two year basis, same store sales have again shown a sequential improvement versus the previous quarter, both in the core U.S. business and for the enterprise as a whole. In fact, since the first quarter, two year comp sales have improved over 600 basis points. Turning to the expense side of the business, gross profit margins fell 90 basis points, 69.2%, primarily driven by a higher mix of sales in our Acceptance Now…

(Operator Instructions) Your first question comes from the line of Brad Thomas with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Good morning everyone. To Dave, I just wanted to thank you for helping us for so many years and wish you all the best in your retirement. My first question was just going to be about the core segment and perhaps if you could provide a little bit more commentary around profitability within the core recognizing at there our number of investments that you presumably made during the quarter such as the rollout of smartphones to work with Deloitte Consulting for example. Could you maybe talk a little bit more about the puts and the takes on the profitability within the core?

Well, I’ll start Brad. This is Mitch. Certainly the negative same-store sales number, albeit better sequentially still puts pressure on the margins. We don’t have enough flexibility on our cost structure, which is really what drives the initiatives. That’s why we’re working on some of the initiatives we’re working on. We’re too highly dependent on the revenue side of the business and not flexible enough on the cost side. Primarily that relates to the initiatives we’re working from a labor standpoint, getting overtime out of the model and getting flexibility in the model with part time labor and so forth. So it is better sequentially. We’re not happy with it with the actual margins. We've got to get flexibility in our model. That’s what we’re working on. You’re right. There is more of a cost upfront to work on that than there is a benefit. We’re spending some money figuring this out and testing and using some consulting help. So it is better sequentially. We take some comfort in that. We got initiatives to work on so that we’re not quite as dependent on same-store sales either driving leverage up or down like it has been throughout our history.

Okay. And then with respect to the store closures that you did in 2Q, is it possible to quantify what the benefit to earnings was in the third quarter from those closures?

I think when we originally talked about that last quarter, we anticipated there being $9 million to $10 million in operating profit benefit for the balance of the year, and we are essentially in-line with that trajectory. So I would say it's about half of that number in the third quarter itself.

Okay, great. And then recognizing that you rolled out smartphones in July and did national advertising in September if I am not mistaken, could you maybe just talk a little bit more exclusively about what that run rate is on the core same-store sales. As of the end of the quarter it does sound like deliveries are up and customer gains are up. Where comps are running and where is your book of businesses at the end of the quarter?

Well, smartphones have done well for us. We’ve talk before about seeing it. We thought from our testing results that it could get to 10% of our business. We’re on track to do that. It's been a little more cannibalistic to our other categories than we anticipated, but overall we came in at the better end of our core guidance for the quarter on same-store sales. Our guidance was 3.5 to 4.5, minus 3.5 to minus 4.5. We ended up at minus 3.6. So overall, business has been really good, was good in the quarter; again on the high side actually the estimates for same-store sales in the quarter. Like I said smartphones are doing great, little more cannibalistic than we anticipated, but obviously when you add it all altogether we’re on high side of our estimates and based on the current trends, what happened in August and September, gain in customers, which as Robert pointed out is where in the summer months in this business, delivery trends over the last six, seven weeks and as we said earlier in the year, we would expect the same-store sales to be essentially flat in the fourth quarter and we didn’t change our guidance and based on the current trends, we still would expect them to be essentially flat in the core in the fourth quarter.

And just to add one comment based on I think relative to the overall comp in the quarter down 3.6, each month throughout Q3 the comp did improve. So that gives us comfort in our assumption leading into Q4 approaching flat in the quarter, and not going from 3.6 to flat, it was better than that when you look at the way the quarter laid out.

Your next question comes from the line of Budd Bugatch with Raymond James. Your line is open.

A couple of questions, I think you said, if I heard you right, Mitch that the flex labor model test begins in November. Can you give us kind of a size and duration of that test?

Budd. Good morning. Yes, the first phase starts in November in a few stores. That will then roll into something in Q1 in an expanded test. We've got to test a few different concepts a few different ways. So it's a first phase. We think there is probably a couple of phases of testing before we have a model to roll out. The second phase should happen sometime probably late first quarter. And by that point in time, certainly in our guidance next year and by the end of the first quarter, we'll be able to talk more about exactly how we are performing the tests and what the rollout schedule would be and then what the savings would be off of that.

Okay, so we will have essentially -- I guess the way we look at that is maybe affecting the second half of next year is where they might see the savings?

So at the earliest, yes -- we won’t know until we -- we do some of this testing, but I would say that the earliest is the second half, third quarter, maybe even fourth quarter next year before we see the benefits of that.

Okay. So the real benefit is really 2016 and beyond as we get that and we get better usage of it, utilization and understanding of the implications. Is that a way to read that?

Yes, certainly from a full-year standpoint, for sure.

Okay.

There will be some instances out in 2015 but from a full-year standpoint, yes, 2016.

Okay, couple of questions on comp because I got confused I think by some of your just comments to Brad. First smartphones, can you give us -- maybe can you put a number on what you think smartphones helped in the quarter, maybe gross and net, if you add cannibalization?

No, we don’t have it broken down that way Budd. Again, they’ve done well. They have cannibalized a little more than we anticipated but yes overall the business was strong. So, by definition that would mean smartphones are actually a little stronger than we modeled, as they’re little more cannibalistic, yet we’re at the high end of our comp guidance; and again by definition that means they’re even a little stronger than we modeled. So, very confident we’re going to end up with 10% of our business or more but we don’t have it broken down on how much it helped the comp and so forth.

So where would you think comps would have been without smartphones? Would it have been midpoint of the guidance, or would it have been the lower end of that third-quarter guidance?

Well, I would -- we had smartphones figured into our guidance. But certainly you'd have to say closer to the lower end, for sure.

Okay. And then as I look at, you said that you -- by the fourth quarter in the fourth quarter then comp store sales overall will be relatively flat or close to flat and the core will be close to flat. That begs the question as to what you think than the other concepts will be because based upon what we have, it would have said if you get close to flat in the quarter the overall comp would have been significantly better than flat. So if you can [indiscernible]…

Sure Budd. I may have misspoke. I don’t know if I misspoke or you misheard me. But essentially flat in the core, but overall same store sales would be certainly positive based on the trends in the Acceptance Now. So, no, we don’t see Acceptance Now or Mexico getting any slower from a same store sales standpoint. So I may have misspoke earlier. But essentially flat in the fourth quarter on the core and you can translate that to what we see overall from a positive standpoint, but it'd certainly be better than plus 1.9 like the third quarter.

Yes, sequentially better. If you're flat in the core and the others are relatively consistent, it's going to be a very nice number at the overall, right? That's the way my math works, anyway.

Right, correct. Sorry if I confused you, Budd.

Well, I'm easily confused, as people who know me well have figured out long time ago. And lastly, from me, the gross margin in Acceptance Now was I think the lowest for the third quarter. And I know we have seasonality and variability in that segment, but was there something going on that caused the cost of sales to be higher in Acceptance Now and how does that portend for the future.

Well, the gross profit was down and compared to the last year it was down to roughly 58%, which is our model on our Web-site for that business. So the gross profit was down year-over-year but only down to what we’ve modeled at 58%. Prior to that is our pricing structure, whether we have 90 day same as cash in the stores and so forth and when we do 90 day same as cash, it can hurt the profit percentage but certainly drives more gross profit dollars because it drives volume. So we’re looking more at growing the dollars than the percentage. Obviously you’d like to do both. But like I’d said we’re more focused on growing the overall gross profit dollars than we have the percentage and again it only dropped to where our model is. Last year was almost 200 basis point higher than our model in the third quarter. So if we can drive more revenue and still hit our model, we don’t consider that a bad thing. The overall operating margin improved sequentially by about 240 basis points and we expect an even better margin in the fourth quarter and our overall operating would be up year-over-year in the fourth quarter. So sequentially it’s getting better in Acceptance Now and the business just continues to do great from a revenue and gross profit standpoint. We’re not 100% happy with the flow through either and we’re working on some things there. And like I said, we will have a higher operating margin in the fourth quarter than what we had in the fourth quarter of last year.

The only thing I would note on that is first quarter is usually the lowest gross margin quarter because of EPO or early purchase. So I understand that it’s where the annual number is for the model, but the quarters do show a great deal of variation. So that was why -- that was the genesis of that question. But thank you for the answer, and David, again, good look to you and congratulations on a great carrier.

Your next question comes from the line of John Baugh with Stifel. Your line is open.

Dave, congrats. I enjoyed working with you. Good luck. Just quickly a couple things. First of all, I'd love some commentary about Mexico, what the plan is there and whether there's any loss or breakeven projections out into the next year.

This is Robert, John. As you know, we've stopped opening stores as we got our 30 plus stores open in the first half of this year. The focus and intent is to take the next 12 months starting July 1st, if you will; so July 1st through June 30th of next year; to stabilize the operation and minimize the losses going forward. We will most likely not make any determination on future new-store growth until at least the end of Q2 next year as we look to get that operation profitable. We do have forecasts for this quarter for Mexico to approach breakeven in December, and right now, we are essentially in line with that forecast. As you know, the demand has been there for quite some time. We want to make sure that our bench is starting to deepen and strengthen. As we open new stores, we want to do it with tenured coworkers as opposed to new coworkers. So that's the focus over the course of the next couple of quarters through Q2 of next year.

Was it the month of December or the quarter of December, breaking even?

Month. John Baugh – Stifel: Month, okay. And then, if you could, the 2014 guidance, you say in the release is consistent with the Q2 press release. And looking at the Q2 press release, I think there were eight different metrics you commented on, everything from comps to EBITDA, tax rates, earnings per share, et cetera. Are we to take that all of those are the same? Certainly, the tax rate would be. Just curious to what numbers might have changed in there?

John, as you know, we gave some ranges around some of those numbers, and I think from our perspective, we feel very comfortable that what we think will happen for the balance of the year is consistent with all of those ranges. And you made the point on tax rate. I think it’s reasonable to assume that tax rate will probably be a little over than what we assume in terms of annual rate now, given what happened in the third quarter. But as for the balance of the guidance, we feel very comfortable with the ranges we established back in Q2 is holding for the balance of the year. John Baugh – Stifel: Great. And then if I could, maybe just on the distribution initiative, how you think about that? It seems like from a cost perspective and a capital perspective, having a vendor ship directly to your store is an inexpensive way to go. But clearly you're suffering some out of stock and maybe some service issues. I'm just curious as to the puts and takes on that particular initiative, particularly as it relates to the capital and expense.

It's a good question, John. We do believe that by using a third-party logistics distribution network that we'll get product to the store cheaper than it's getting there now, at a lower cost that it's getting there now, based on buying full containers and truckloads from the vendor and then having it distributed through this third-party organization. Overall, our costs will come down. The stocks will go down. There will be an initial inventory cost -- not like an inventory cost where if we had our own DCs, we had to fill our own DCs. And we're still working on what the number will be, but there will be some initial cost to start the flow of goods that way. We should be able to, by getting faster delivery to our stores, be able to make up for that in the inventory at the store by having lower minimums going to the store, not having to have five or six pieces of one particular product come to the store like it does now from a vendor. So there will be some offsets. When we give our guidance at the beginning of next year we’ll have that in our capital and in our cash flow guidance. So there will be some initial inventory next year in these warehouses. We believe we’ll be able to offset it with the inventory at the store level. But overall, even if that’s a net positive, it is a little more cash clean inventory. At the end of the day, we’re going to have lower cost on a product by product basis in our stores, which will help us from a pricing standpoint, a growth standpoint, demand, retention and all those things. So our modeling of that initiative is very positive overall.

And given we’re leveraging a third party there is no CapEx. We’re not building anything. So, most of the capital is working capital. John Baugh – Stifel: Got it. And my last question is on the held-for-rent, you mentioned without smartphones it would've been in line. Is that a number that's going to come back in line? And I guess did you have to buy all of these smartphones at once in some package deals to save money, or how do I think about that going forward?

Yes, that's a great question. Yes, they will come back in line when it gets to -- when inventory on smartphones becomes 25% of -- roughly 25% of what's on rent. But right now there is as much idle as there is on rent because, yes, we've had to secure the inventory. Things like the Note 4 rolling out last week, you get them when you can. So yes. And actually that happens, John, with any new product that we buy. If we were even buying a new type of TV, like the ultra-high-definition TVs, the 4K TVs, we’ve just started carrying those. And we probably have more idle than we have on rent today. So it effects it negatively until you get enough of them on rent. The smartphones we're calling out, just because it's become a big category for us. We have rented a lot of them. But it happens every time we start a new product. This is just bigger and needs to be called out otherwise. Our inventory would be 2 or 3 points higher. And we get a lot of questions on why. That's why we called out the difference.

Your next question comes from the line of Laura Champine with Canaccord. Your line is open.

You mentioned the disappointing profitability in the Acceptance Now business in the quarter. How much did it cost that ran through the P&L to rollout the new kiosk technology? And then could you talk about some other things you're doing to improve the overall profitability of the Acceptance Now segment?

The costs, I don't know if you have that, Guy, as far as how much that was as far as the cost. Most of that would've been capitalized costs, developing that technology. So it probably wasn't a big part, Laura. We're working on improving margins. Losses is the biggest category. And though we were sequentially lower in the third quarter than the second quarter, we're higher than last year. But, again, sequentially better, and we expect that to continue in the fourth quarter. So that's part of it. A focus there that's working so far, again, and being sequentially lower, third quarter over the second quarter. And also some of the infrastructure for growth that went in the business has been on the business on the front end of the year and is done now for the year. So revenue catches up to that, as we get into the fourth quarter, would be the other one. Those were the two big ones effecting investment speed, has already been made, and the fact that losses are sequentially coming down. And when you combine those two with a revenue growth, we'll have our best operating margin in the fourth quarter that we've had in probably two years.

You mentioned that in the core business, I think that 3.4% charge off or skips and stolens just applies to the core business. What is that same metric for the Acceptance Now business?

I don’t have that in front of me. It will be in the queue Laura. I don’t know if these guys have it or not. But like I said, it was -- in my notes here I know the 60 basis points lower than the second quarter and it’s a 160 basis points higher than last year but again sequentially better and Dave Carpenter is getting me the numbers right now. And I guess these will be in the queue but looks like they’re at 6.7%, which would have made last year 5.1% at 160 basis points. And again remember those always going to be higher numbers than are in the core because we pay more for the products, down from Q2 that was 7.7%.

Yes, Q2 was 7.7%, Q3 6.7%. Last year though in Q3 was the 5.1%; so sequentially quite a bit better but still higher than last year. And again they will always be higher than the core because we’re paying retail for the product and that’s in our model.

Got it. And then lastly, what can you do to -- what are the initiatives that you are taking to improve that rate?

Good question. It’s all operational execution and making our calls when we need to, executing properly on when we need to be at somebody’s front door, knocking on their door when they are certain number of days past due. So it’s executing the plan, which they did improve in the operating team over there. Mark Denman has improved quite a bit in the third quarter, and we're seeing that continued improvement as we get into the fourth quarter. Laura, I could give you a real complicated answer, but it's really just executing our program and when we're supposed be calling them and when we're supposed to be running the customers that are past due.

Your next question comes from the line of John Rowan with Sidoti & Company. Your line is open. John Rowan - Sidoti & Company: Over the past year, have you seen any discernible shift in the return rates out of Acceptance Now?

We have not. As I mentioned, John, the metrics are staying in line with our expectation and historically as far as the returns. So no, not seeing any shift there. John Rowan - Sidoti & Company: Okay and Mitch, I think you said about 10% of the business could be cell phones. I am assuming 10% means 10% of revenue.

Yes, we can get ourselves to 10% of revenue on track to get there in the core, 10% of the core revenue. John Rowan - Sidoti & Company: And what other product categories are cell phones actually consuming or cannibalizing?

The biggest one, probably won't surprise you is the tablet business, but computers in general, primarily the tablet business, a little bit from a laptop standpoint, but primarily the tablet business. John Rowan - Sidoti & Company: Okay and then just last question with -- with gas prices coming down, can you kind of give some historical perspective as how that's affected your business and if we do see lower pump prices for the remainder of the year, how does that affect your guys going forward?

Well, John, I think you’ve heard us in the past talk about the gas prices going the other direction. I think this is at least some silver lining in the current macro-environment that gas prices are actually coming down. I think historically what we’ve talked about, as gas prices increase, it does two things. One it impacts demand pretty immediately in terms of our consumers having less disposable income. That also impacts our cost with our fleet of vehicles out there making deliveries and running the count and doing pickups everyday as well. We certainly view the current trend in gas prices as a potential tailwind. I wouldn’t suggest you that we are overly bullish in our forecast going forward as a result of the gas prices. Primarily just given the broader macro-environment, it continues to be a challenge for our consumers, such as the unemployment extensions that stopped at the end of last year. Wages are not increasing for our customers throughout the course of the ’14. I think everyone knows that benefits decrease November of last. Subprime credit is actually expanding for our consumer base, particularly in the higher end, and I’m not sure many folks are aware of this, but credit scoring now excludes medical debt in collections and that helps increase credit scores by about 25 points and that perhaps gives additional consumers more credit. So while gas prices could perhaps be a tailwind, there are still other factors that are applying a little bit of pressure on us on the other side. So we like what we’re seeing in gas prices. I think it will help us more on our own cost side than it will on demand at least in the near term, but it’s a potential tailwind with some upside. But we’re not forecasting bullish increases in demand as a result.

Your next question comes from the line of Carla Casella with JPMorgan. Your line is open.

One housekeeping item, just if you could give us what your AVL or your revolver drawn was and the availability on it.

Our revolver draw is a little under $200 million at this point, which would leave us with about $600 million of availability. So, a little less than $200 million drawn on our revolver.

$600 million total -- $200 million drawn. There's about $375 million - $380 million that's available.

Okay great. And then on the pricing, now that you’ve done some pricing, more studies, can you just tell us where you think in general you’re too high on pricing and where you’ve been too low in key categories that jump out?

Well, it’s a little more complex than that, Carla, as far as what part of the pricing impacted us. We have so many different levers in that. There is a rate. There is a term to acquire ownership. There is a 90 day same as cash price percentage of overall rent-to-own amount driving the 90 day same as cash price. There is an early purchase discounts percentage that we can raise or lower. So we're playing with a lot of those things, but in general it’s about where you expect it to be, based on what you see in retail. The most pressure are on electronics, computers and televisions and there is a lot less pressure on appliances and furniture, just like what you see traditional markup in retailers. Electronics continue to deflate and those stay under a lot of pressure. So as we think of these levers, the electronics categories are certainly more sensitive than the furniture categories.

Okay. And then in smartphones, do you have a sense for who you are taking share from, given that you are a new entrant into that market?

I can’t tell you with any certainty. There's certainly a lot of places to get smartphones and probably drawing a little bit from everywhere. Keep in mind that a customer may just be expanding the market too, giving the opportunity to put $600 retail phone in the hands of someone who may not qualify for credit or it could just be expanding the market. Not that those people didn’t have -- don’t have phones when they walk in our store now, but they might not have the smartphone they want. So probably as much Carla as we’re expanding the market as anything else as far as -- and then as far as the other part where we'd taking share from people is probably spread out across the spectrum.

Okay. And then just one last question. On the Acceptance Now business, I know Conn's has been a big customer of yours, and I'm wondering if you're fully rolled out in Conn's and if you're seeing anything specific in that business. They've had some weaker numbers.

We are fully rolled out in Conn's. I think if we're not in every store, we're in almost every store. Business with Conn's has been very good for us and continues to be very good. So we're not seeing any drop-off. If anything, it's better than it's been in the past. So overall we're very happy with that relationship and things are going very strong there.

Our next question comes from the line of Jon Braatz with Kansas City Capital. Your line is open.

Mitch, a couple of questions. Looking at cell phones in isolation, are cell phones more profitable, less profitable than the other product lines? And then secondly, you mentioned you are rolling out virtual kiosks in 600 Acceptance Now. How might that change -- how is that changing the dynamics of those individual stores? And can that rollout incrementally by itself improve the overall margins at Acceptance Now?

Sure, Jon. The first one, phones are approximately the same. They may be 1% lower or something, but generally speaking they are about the same as our other product categories; again, maybe slightly lower. We're forecasting slightly higher losses in that category than other products. There will be a little more damage and so forth. So when you put everything together, slightly lower but not significant. On Acceptance Now, the virtual technology, it improves productivity. It's just so much faster -- in our manned locations, so much faster for the transaction now. That's helping drive more business, especially when the stores are at peak periods, like a Friday afternoon or a Saturday. We're more productive, it's faster, it's a better customer experience. So it increases the amount of deliveries they can do in a day and its increasing business. From a margin standpoint, it eventually could help margins in that we may find we can run the stores with less labor. We're looking at that. We're just so new into it, we don't know for sure yet whether we can. But I can envision a day where, if it's a more productive transaction -- a transaction only takes a few minutes rather than 45 minutes. So you should be able to lower your labor cost. And of course, as we apply it next year into what we call unmanned locations, it will increase the margins quite a bit because we'll have no labor at all in the store. So today it's not helping the margins. I can see a time next year where it starts to help the actual margins. Today we're getting benefit from a revenue standpoint in that it helps the business. I can see down the road into next year where it can help the margin side as well.

Your next question comes from the line of William Reuter with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

On the Acceptance Now, I was wondering whether you had had any of your partners that are exiting their relationship of any scale recently. And then kind of what you guys see in terms of potential to expand into additional partners over the next 12 months or so?

Sure, William. We have not seen anyone of any scale like with their relationship. And as far as opportunity, there is lots of them. The demand is still heavy. Almost all of our -- all furniture players want it in their stores as fast as we can get it there. They are certainly -- we know that other companies like Sears and Kmart have it in their store with one of our competitors. So that -- certainly we see that as an opportunity down the road for us to try to get that business. And then there is other businesses that don’t have it in their store yet but present an opportunity for us. So suffice it to say William, the demand is strong and that business will continue to grow for a number and number of years.

Have you guys -- given the fact that you guys have moved into cell phones in your core, have you guys had any conversations with the wireless providers themselves?

You know, we haven't yet. We want to make sure we can figure it out for ourselves first, because we want to make sure we can get returns, perfect getting a return, and perfect the execution of getting a return and being able to refurbish it into a like new condition and re-box it and those kind of things. Because once we do it in Acceptance Now, we'll get returns from that business, albeit not many at a 75% keep rate, but we will get some. So we're figuring it out for ourselves, but certainly we see that as an opportunity down the road that Acceptance Now getting into smartphone vendors.

Okay. And then just my last question kind of on the same topic. You guys noted that you expect to have higher losses on the cell phone business. I'm wondering at what point you guys will have enough data where you can see whether your estimates around the profitability of this segment are indeed kind of pretty similar to very slightly below some of your other categories based upon what you guys are receiving back. So, what’s the timeline when you'll have enough data there?

I would say another couple of quarters.

I guess through Q1 and with payouts anyways to see how behaviors changed during play out season too.

Yes, when the income tax refunds come in. So I would say by the end of Q1 we’d have pretty good data on whether our forecast is right. Remember our forecast isn’t based on just what we think will happen. It was based on six to nine months' worth of testing in three different markets.

Your next question comes from the line of Karru Martinson with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open.

Just wondering, when we look at the year-ago fourth quarter, could you remind us of the weather impact in December?

I don't recall it being a major impact for us. I don't. Fourth quarter was a little rough last year. December especially was rough for us, but I don't recall it being a weather-related issue.

Okay. So when we look at the flat comp in the core, it’s really coming from those customer gains that you’ve seen -- the momentum that you’ve seen coming on a month to month basis.

Absolutely.

All right. When you look at the core store shopper, certainly a stressed consumer, but where is that shopper going today? Is it the Sears? Is it the Buddy's, the Aaron's, or is that shopper just not shopping right now?

Well, they are shopping with us over the last couple of months. So our trends have gotten a lot better in the customer growth. Robert mentioned gaining customers in August and September, which is hard to do in this business. We're up customers in October. So I guess they're coming back to us over the last few months. Certainly where there's competitors out there they could be going to, there is lower-priced -- more the discount shops. You mentioned a couple of them from a retail standpoint, and certainly there is rent-to-own competition as well.

Okay. When you -- I think on the second quarter call you talked about the 600 kiosks updated for technology. We’ve reached that kind of goal heading here into the fourth quarter. Is there still expansion opportunity this year or on the virtual technology where is that all going to kind of flow through next year?

The rest of it will be on next year. We don’t want to do much in the fourth quarter. It’s such a busy time of year in our retail partner stores as well as our core stores. So, it would be on next year Karru.

Okay. And just -- sorry to harp on the implied guidance for the fourth quarter. But were there any one-time charges last year that we should be mindful of? If I remember, there were a lot of moving parts last year.

There was some in there. Guy?

Yes, we did have -- in the fourth quarter we had a number of issues that put some pressure on margins in the business. So certainly if you look at our quarterly results last year, the fourth quarter featured our lowest margins of the quarter. So when Mitch commented earlier, we certainly feel strongly about margins getting better through the balance of the year. But when you look at the acceleration versus what we delivered last year, it accelerates further in part because last year caught some pressure on the margin side.

I am showing that there are no further questions at this time. So I turn the call back over to Mr. Davis for closing summary.

Thank you, Stephanie, and thank you all for your interest in the company and for joining us this morning. As mentioned earlier, we are generally pleased with the quarter but know we still have our work cut out for us and that’s why our sense of urgency remains high to execute on our initiatives and help deliver more leverage to the business to achieve more stable earnings and cash flows over time. So, thank you for joining us. We look forward to reporting back to you next quarter.