Good morning, and welcome to UMH Properties, Inc.'s Fourth Quarter and Year End 2024 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, to withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note this event is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Mr. Craig Koster, Executive Vice President and General Counsel. Thank you, Mr. Koster. You may begin.

Thank you very much, operator. In addition to the 10-K that we filed with the SEC yesterday, we have filed an unaudited fourth quarter and year-end supplemental information presentation. The supplemental information presentation, along with our 10-K, are available on the company's website at umh.reit. I would like to remind everyone that certain statements made during this conference call, which are not historical facts, may be deemed forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements that we make on this call are based on our current expectations and involve various risks and uncertainties. Although the company believes the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, the company can provide no assurance that its expectations will be achieved. The risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations are detailed in the company's fourth quarter and year-end 2024 earnings release and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company disclaims any obligation to update its forward-looking statements. In addition, during today's call, we will be discussing non-GAAP financial metrics. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial metrics to the comparable GAAP financial metrics, as well as the explanatory and cautioning language, are included in our earnings release, our supplemental information, and our historical SEC filings. Having said that, I would like to introduce management with us today: Eugene Landy, Founder and Chairman; Samuel Landy, President and Chief Executive Officer; Anna Chew, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Brett Taft, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Jim Lykins, Vice President of Capital Markets; and Daniel Landy, Executive Vice President. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to UMH Properties, Inc.'s President and Chief Executive Officer, Samuel Landy.

Thank you very much, Craig. We are pleased to deliver another quarter and year of increased FFO per share, double-digit community NOI growth, and a new all-time high sales record. Normalized FFO for the quarter was $0.24 per share as compared to $0.23 per share last year, representing an increase of 4%. Normalized FFO for the year was $0.93 per share as compared to $0.86 last year, representing an increase of 8%. We are very proud of these results, and we look forward to delivering another great year on all fronts in 2025 and beyond. We have opportunistically raised equity at prices at or near our 52-week high. This capital will be invested accretively into our platform. UMH Properties, Inc. has a long-term value-add business plan. Our platform generates our current income, and FFO does not fully reflect the tremendous effort we are putting into our future results. Our approximately 2,400 acres of vacant land, 3,300 vacant sites, 500 new homes in inventory in various stages of setup, with an additional 200 on the way, are all part of our efforts to generate future income and ensure that we have sites available to continue our income and earnings growth. At any given time, UMH Properties, Inc. has $100 million or more invested that is not yet producing accretive returns. Our results are strong, and we continue to work to achieve even better results. Additionally, we have opportunistically tapped the equity market through our common ATM and raised a substantial amount of capital that has not yet been invested. As the capital raised is invested in new acquisitions, rental homes, and expansions, our earnings per share should continue to grow. Our same property operating results continue to grow. Our value-add strategy allows us to drive substantial improvements in occupancy, revenue, and…

Thank you, Sam. Normalized FFO, which excludes amortization and nonrecurring items, was $19.2 million or $0.24 per diluted share for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $15.4 million or $0.23 per diluted share for 2023, resulting in a 4% per share increase. For the full year 2024, normalized FFO was $69.5 million or $0.93 per diluted share compared to $54.5 million or $0.86 per diluted share for 2023, resulting in an 8% per share increase. We were able to obtain this increase in normalized FFO despite our operating results being impacted by our investments in growing the company, through value-add acquisitions and developments, and increasing expenses due to inflation. Rental and related income for the quarter was $53.3 million compared to $49.2 million a year ago, representing an increase of 8%. For the full year, rental-related income increased from $189.7 million in 2023 to $207 million in 2024, an increase of 9%. This increase was primarily due to the increases in metro rates, same property occupancy, and additional rental homes. Community operating expenses increased 8% during the quarter and 7% for the year. This increase was mainly due to increases in payroll and payroll costs, real estate taxes, insurance, professional fees, waste removal, water expenses, and sewer expenses. Despite the increase in community operating expenses, community NOI increased by 8% for the quarter, from $28.7 million in 2023 to $31.1 million in 2024, and increased by 10% for the full year from $108.4 million in 2023 to $119.7 million in 2024. Our same property results continue to meet our expectations. Same property income increased by 8% for the quarter and 9% for the year, generating same property NOI growth of 8% for the quarter and 10% for the year. From a liquidity standpoint, we ended the year with $99.7…

We have a mission to provide the nation with high-quality affordable housing. We have made strides in executing this mission through the acquisition and rehabilitation of older communities, the development of expansion sites, and new communities, and the financing of home sales. We have the best quality affordable housing at our price point. UMH Properties, Inc. is a leader in the manufacturing housing industry. We have worked with MHI and our manufacturers to improve our product and provide housing solutions in both rural and urban settings. We have championed the Duplex manufactured home, which allows us to increase density and provide affordable housing in more expensive markets. We have also worked with GAF to pilot a solar home where solar shingles, unlike solar panels, are installed at the factory. This will ultimately reduce our tenants' monthly payment, thereby giving them more discretionary income. Installing shingles at the factory greatly reduces the cost. Additionally, we are working on obtaining long-term patient capital through our Opportunity Zone fund and our joint venture with Nuveen. There are many opportunities available, but they take time to upgrade, develop, and fill. With the availability of long-term patient capital, we are able to continue to upgrade our existing communities while increasing the pace of development and value-add deals and growing UMH Properties, Inc.'s future acquisition pipeline. Our country needs an affordable housing solution. We are working diligently to do more to help provide this housing and position manufactured housing as the preferred solution to the problem. We've done a lot over the past 56 years, but we have a lot more to do. With a strong balance sheet and growth opportunities, 2025 should be an exciting year for UMH Properties, Inc. Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. Our first question comes from Gaurav Mehta with Alliance Global Partners. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning. I wanted to go back to your comment. I think you mentioned four acquisitions under contract. I wanted to get some more color on those acquisitions, how those acquisitions were sourced, and is there any value-add opportunity in those acquisitions?

Yeah. Brett Taft here. So, yeah, as you mentioned, we've got four communities under contract now. Previously, we had two communities under contract. We've increased that pipeline by two communities, both located in New Jersey. Those communities contain 266 sites. They are 100% occupied. The purchase price on those is $24.6 million or about $92,000 a site. Those two communities are obviously stabilized given the high occupancy rates. We do have some upside there in turning over a portion of the homes and increasing the rents to market because they are in New Jersey. Additionally, there's an opportunity for sales profits as we remove some of the older homes in those communities, which there's not too many, we'll also be able to increase our brokerage income there through reselling tenant homes. The two additional communities are in Maryland. They're the same two communities we've had under contract for a while now. We've been working through some diligence matters with the seller. We believe we're close to the end of that process and those should close in the second quarter. So these four communities, $39.2 million total, should close in the first half of the year. Can change and we'll see where we land, but we're happy to grow the pipeline. We're looking at a lot of additional opportunities and think we're going to find more deals that meet our growth criteria. You also mentioned the value-add component. The only deal with a real value-add component there is one of the two Maryland properties. It's about 70% occupied. There's 45 vacant sites. We will implement our typical strategy, upgrading the community, paving the roads, making sure the infrastructure and the amenities are in place, and then we'll put our rental home program in and drive occupancy growth.

Okay. Thank you. Second question I wanted to ask on the mortgage. I think you're looking to refinance with Fannie Mae for mortgages coming due in the first half of 2025. I wanted to get some more color on what kind of interest rate should we expect on those refinancing?

Well, we are using Fannie Mae, and we are in discussions with Fannie Mae. As a matter of fact, we're in the due diligence process in that respect. Based on the current interest rates, we believe that we will be under 6%, probably in the 5.5% to 5.75% range. And we believe that the proceeds from it will be more than our current balances, so we will be able to take additional capital out of those refinancings.

I just want to mention when we refinance these properties, we get appraisals. Appraisals prove everything we always say. You take every dollar of what we paid for a community, every dollar we put into it, and ten years later, they double in value. Add to that, I looked at one of the communities being refinanced where we had built a ten-lot expansion years ago. But back then, the expansion lots cost approximately $50,000 per lot, and we were adding sales earning sales profits, so the net cost of those lots was, you know, significantly less than $50,000. But today, those lots appraised at $102,000 per lot.

Okay. Last question I have is on G&A. I just wanted to get some more color. Was there any nonrecurring items in the 4Q G&A that you guys reported?

On the G&A, yes. It did increase for the fourth quarter. That was primarily due to additional bonuses that we accrued for because of our good operating results. Over the year, we record the amount that's based upon, again, current earnings and current operations. But at year-end, what we do is we look at the whole picture and see how much we need. In total, I think G&A did go up about 8%. So, therefore, we believe that that is probably the going rate into next year, around there anyway, 7% to 8%, depending, of course, on inflation and other things that we do.

Okay. Thank you. That's all I had.

The next question comes from Rob Stevenson with Janney. Please go ahead.

Good morning, guys. Anna, what are the big swing factors that cause you to report the high end versus the low end of your 2025 guidance range?

I will give that to Jim. Jim?

I would say the big two are home sales and acquisitions.

Okay. So at the top end, you do more than the four that you guys have talked about that Brett talked about before, and then, you know, you'd also be doing more home sales than what you did in 2024.

Exactly.

Okay. And just to add on the home sales comment, you know, over the past few years, we've invested a lot of money into our expansions, which are now opening. They're getting a lot of positive traction, and there's always a variable in the pace and the timing of sales. So we've got the opportunity in Maryland at Cinnamon Woods. I believe it's 60 lots, which we've just opened. Those should be highly profitable sales. The question is how many and how quickly do we gain traction? Holiday Village in Nashville, which two years ago, we had a new expansion open. We sold 36 new homes, $5 million in volume. You know, that was an exceptional year. It was so good that we ran out of lots. So, you know, that really wasn't totally reflected in the 2024 numbers, but the good news is we're opening a new phase right now with another 70 lots. So we've got the opportunity to substantially improve sales at that location. You look at Duck River Estates down in Columbia, Tennessee, an outstanding location, only a few vacant lots right now, but we're in construction on another phase. That'll be, I believe, it's 95 lots. So, you know, I could keep going down this list, but the point being, there's a lot of expansions opening. It's hard to exactly predict what sales are going to be, they could completely exceed our expectation.

I guess along those same lines, you've got still a significant occupancy upside at your five southernmost assets in Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina. What type of monthly leasing velocity have you seen there and how has that been trending over the last six months or so?

Yeah. We've been doing very well at those communities. I would say Alabama's probably got 40 vacant sites left to fill. We believe that at the first property down there, DeRon, we expect those sites to be full this year. The second property that we opened in Alabama, we ran into some zoning and site plan issues. We're through those problems now and we're rapidly infilling that property over the last three months of the year. I believe we filled 20 units. But, again, now we're at the point where we're bringing new inventory and getting it set up and have a few capital improvements we need to complete before we can, you know, really work on filling the rest of that property. South Carolina, the first asset we acquired is basically full. There's a few vacant sites, but it's really just rental home turnover. The second property, we're again working on infrastructure improvements so we can keep putting homes in. So I'd say demand and velocity is extremely strong. It's just a function of when can we complete these improvements, when can we get the homes, and you know, ultimately, once we have the homes in place and set up, they're renting as rapidly as we get them in.

Okay. That's helpful. And then you guys talked about adding 800 new rental homes in 2025 to the portfolio. What is the average price per rental home you're buying today? And how does that cost change given the, you know, this elevated level of inflation and changes to material labor cost?

Different prices have, we're, you know, invoicing around $60,000 to $65,000, in some cases less than that based on winter discounts, which are $10,000 to $15,000 in setup. So we're in that $70,000 to $75,000 range for your typical single-wide rental home. In certain cases, we're renting multi-section homes. Those are on the books for probably about $90,000 a home, but they're generating higher rents. So that's where it's been. We were optimistic that home prices will not change too much. If you go back to, you know, the middle to end of COVID, prices have come down from there. So we're still well below that peak, and we are hopeful that it doesn't get up there again, but only time will tell.

Okay. And then the last one for me. How much more does it cost to put the solar shingles on one of these homes than traditional shingles that Gene was talking about?

This is absolutely amazing. To put a solar roof on a manufactured home in a park is over $25,000. And to put it in the factory when you build it, is under $15,000. On top of that, it is simply amazing to see the process and that it takes less than 45 minutes to put a roof on a house. This is remarkable what we can do with factory-built housing.

And does that number already include any type of federal or local rebates, etcetera? Is that net or are there benefits to you guys on top of that?

Yeah. The roof is not going to be owned by UMH Properties, Inc. In the beginning, a third-party company will own the roofing shingles. The tenant's utility bill is going to go down because of the solar roof, and we will be paid a small amount for the use of the roof. But the big benefit is reducing the resident's monthly utility cost through solar. The second step of this, at some point, the technology is not there today. But at some point, the factory can install the battery. And they can install the battery at the factory at a lower cost than doing it anywhere else. And then they can install the car charger at the factory at a lower cost than doing it anywhere else. So ultimately, and it may be three years from today, I don't know what it'll be. But ultimately, the factory home will have a solar roof, and the owner of that shingle could pull up the rebates, not a factory solar roof, a factory battery, and a factory car charger. So that at our houses, someone could park their car in the driveway, plug into their solar car charger at night because the electric coming from the battery and charge their car at a lower fuel cost than anywhere else. So that's the ultimate objective. At this moment, I think it's 20 homes are being delivered with the solar shingle.

Okay. So your cost on those homes isn't going up to $75,000 to $80,000. That $15,000 for the factory-done stuff is being paid for by Solar Run or one of those types of companies out there. And that cost is not basically hitting you guys in terms of the cost of the rental unit.

That is absolutely correct. Yes.

Okay. So no cost differential to you. That's a third party. Okay. That's helpful. Thank you. Appreciate the time this morning, guys.

You too. And the next question comes from Rich Anderson with Wedbush. Please go ahead.

Thanks and good morning. So 565 rentals added in 2024, a target of 800. What gives you the confidence that you can see that type of acceleration on the rental side?

Yeah. Brett here. So if you go back to 2023 when we had adequate inventory, we were able to rent close to a thousand homes and, you know, including sales, it was around 1,100 total homes moved from our inventory last year given the challenges we had in 2023. Obtaining the homes, getting them set up, utility issues, carrying costs related to interest on floor plan, etcetera. We were just a little bit more conservative in the first quarter, which really sets us up for occupancy gains throughout the year. So this year right now, we have about, including our joint venture, 680 homes in inventory or on order, I'm sorry, we've got about 490 of those already delivered to our communities. About 390 of those were delivered within the last six months. So we already have a better starting inventory place than we did. These homes are located in strong markets where they, you know, generally rent as soon as they're fully set up and CO'd and ready for occupancy. So we anticipate faster growth in the rental home program in the first half than we saw last year. And we will more aggressively order homes as we're occupying homes at the strong demand locations.

But what is the chance that some of those five or six hundred homes that are sitting in inventory don't get rented, but get sold?

There's definitely a good chance that a lot of those homes in inventory get sold. Again, same strategy. We would go and continue to replace those homes. And, you know, if somebody wants to come in and buy it, we will sell it to them. If somebody wants to rent it, we will rent it to them. We do anticipate growing sales last year, given some of the expansions we've opened that we discussed earlier on the call. You know, I would think that sales of new homes should be in the 200 new homes, Nick. Year. I think we did about 130 last year for 136. Yeah. We expect growing sales, but, again, I think that we're gonna see a lot more of our growth through the rental program. At our high-demand locations, which have, you know, historically proven that they're able to do this. Again, going back to 2023, we had one community that rented a hundred homes. We had several other communities that rented 60 or 70. Those properties do still have vacancy and do still have strong demand and are doing a good job keeping their occupancy rates up on the existing rental program. So, you know, not promising. We'll hit those exact numbers again, but we do believe that we'll be able to get 800 new homes in this year on the rental front and hopefully sell 200 new homes.

Okay. And then you know, same we talked Perfect.

What's that?

No. Go ahead.

Okay. Sure. Yeah. So we talked, you know, a month or so ago about some of the changes in Sam you referred to, you know, maybe an ability to sell more homes with a new administration in place and so on. I'm wondering you know, what your thought is about the ability to sell more you know, perhaps relaxing Dodd-Frank or whatever driver that might be. Do you feel like the economics are better or worse as a home renter or a home seller from your lens, or is it kind of a wash you just like the optionality?

Sure. Well, the important point is UMH Properties, Inc. has over a fifty-year history operating communities, and we have, you know, absolutely proven that communities with factory-built homes for sale or rent work. It's that simple. We're the most efficient provider of housing because the factories provide a great product at a low price, and then we provide a great community at a fair price. And there are people who only need housing on a one or three-year basis. They see themselves as temporary. They are always gonna be renters. And because we opened the door to those people, right, previously, that door was closed to them. Previously, the original model of manufactured home communities was you own the home and rented the lot. So that whole group of people was not a potential customer. We've brought 10,300 of those people in as customers. Now sales continue because as somebody who lives in a rental, says, you know, this is a great community. And this is where I wanna live. And the house, if they appreciate the value, you build equity in the house, as this occurs, we get more and more sales. And we've done a great job putting our communities near each other, and our marketing and all that's increasing sales, but add to that the possible changes in the finance laws, if it happens, would create a dramatic increase in home sales.

Okay. Do you when you're talking to your rental residents, is there a very clear percentage of those people that are renting that would love to own, but simply can't. I mean, do you get that very palpable sort of indication within your portfolio?

Well, we do convert resident-owned homes to rentals today. You know, they build equity in their house. They only get the rent increase on the lot rent, not on the full home rent. So they reduce their rent increase by basically 50% by owning the home. You know, I don't talk to enough residents to give you an actual survey. But my, you know, the ultimate objective is 100 to 300 and maybe more of those 15-year-old homes each year could be sold to the existing resident and we'd continue to still grow the rental home portfolio by 800 units with 800 new rentals.

Okay. That's really great. We'll be really curious of that 10,300 of rental homes. You know, if you ever were to do a survey, how many of them are happy as renters or would rather be an owner would be interesting data for me, I guess. But, anyway, just a comment. Thanks very much. Great quarter. Appreciate it.

Thank you.

And the next question comes from Craig Kucera with Lucid Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Yeah. Hey. Good morning, guys. You know, your leverage has significantly dropped over the past couple of years. And I'd be curious to hear is there a target that UMH Properties, Inc. is looking to work toward or is this just been a matter of taking advantage of the capital markets?

Hey, Craig. Good morning. We are, as you know, we've always been a conservative company. Our net debt to total market cap is usually in the 30% to 40% range. We did take advantage of the capital markets. But don't forget, every year, we are a growing company. Based on our business plan, we need between $120 million to $150 million a year. So, therefore, we opportunistically raised additional capital, which we believe that we will use. Additionally, we did have $115 million in debt coming due, so we wanted to make sure that we had the capital not only to pay down our debt but also to grow our company. So we did have additional ATM proceeds last year, which is fine, which is great because we will be using it this year.

Okay. UMH Properties, Inc. was built to build at least a thousand homes a year, and I'd like to see us do two thousand homes a year. And if it costs $100,000 for the home installed, $150,000, the total cost is $200,000, or even call it $250,000. So it's $200 million to do a thousand homes. And we'd like to do even more. So with the capital-intensive business and it takes a long time to build these communities and to get the community filled. And to get the rents where it's a very productive, we've been doing it a long time, and we're going to continue to do it. And we're going to continue to grow the company, both equity capital, preferred capital, and debt capital.

If I could add one thing, the customer is showing one thing in housing very well, and that's the government-sponsored entities. What Anna said is we can get long-term financing of our communities at all or below 6% in this market at this time, and that's simply amazing. Other REITs that are in different categories, offices, hotels, they don't have the advantage of the government-sponsored entities and they're paying two, three, four points higher than we have access to the capital market, that market. So it's a big advantage to our sector and to UMH Properties, Inc.

Okay. Great. Changing gears, Brett, I think your operating expense budget typically is about 5% to 7% on the same-store basis. Is that still the expectation for 2025 or, you know, is it maybe gonna be a little bit more excess because of the very snowy winter and snow removal costs or any color that'd be appreciated?

Yeah. I would say, you know, 5% to 7% is still the right range. Honestly, 5% would be phenomenal. I think it's probably in the 6% to 7% range given, you know, what you mentioned with storms, snow removal, etcetera. It also adds there are a few other items that are in our 8% in the fourth quarter. Professional fees related to some various projects and tax appeals and things like that that increased, which we don't expect to happen next year. So, you know, we feel pretty comfortable for the full year 2025. We will be in that, call it, 6% to 7% range. 5% would be great. There's probably going to be some other additional inflationary pressure on our operations.

Got it. That's appreciated. Let's talk about finance for a second. Just given what's happened with home prices, are you seeing any change in the typical buyer versus a few years ago? Are they maybe better credits or higher income than they were at a been pushed out of maybe potentially buying a single-family home or has credit and income been relatively constant over the last years?

No. My belief is the widening of the affordability gaps plus the fact that we're building these great expansions putting in, you know, extremely high-end homes better than any homes of the past. You know, results in higher credit quality, you know, higher down payments. You could see the percentage that paid cash for the home. So as conventional has the, you know, conventional home sales are currently a little bit blocked. But as people can sell their existing home, you're gonna see more and more of them downsize and buy a house from us all cash. Those are gonna be our highest-end homes that, you know, $250,000 to $300,000. It was lot rents of about $750 per month. And that, you know, it's kinda more like 2006 when we were selling the biggest, most expensive houses to people downsizing, and I see that occurring, you know, for the next five years, we have available expansion lots.

Great. Just one more for me. I'd be curious if you had any conversations with the manufactured housing builders about how tariffs might impact business. You know, are they worried about input costs or maybe will there be any supply chain issues?

Brett, do you have anything there? I don't know of anything.

All I can really say there is that in speaking with and ordering homes from our manufacturers, we haven't experienced any issues yet. You know, backlogs are still in that, call it, eight-week range. Some of them a little bit further out than that. So to this point, there haven't been any major problems. I'm sure it's something our manufacturers are worried about. But we'll update you as we get more information there.

Okay. Great. Thanks.

And the next question comes from John Massocca with B. Riley. Please go ahead.

Good morning.

Morning.

So with the acquisitions, you know, I know you kinda gave the cap rate, but what's kind of the stabilized return you're looking for across that entire pipeline?

Yeah. So looking out over, call it, five years, we should be yielding in the 6.5% to 7% range on these properties.

Okay. Appreciate the color. And then on the in-place portfolio, any change in kind of bad debt expense in 4Q or even anything you're seeing into this year thus far?

Not at all. We still maintain approximately a 1% write-off, so we're very happy with our experience in that regard.

Okay. And then, you know, how should we kinda think about, you know, headline occupancy as you keep adding new homes to the portfolio, I guess, is the level we kinda saw in 4Q, you know, indicative of where things should go just given it is kind of new vacancy being added to the portfolio every quarter, if you will, because you're putting in new sites and you're putting in new rental units, etcetera, or is there potential for that, you know, vacancy number to shrink even further?

Yeah. So what I would say is that there's definitely potential for this existing pool of assets and the vacancy number to shrink further. You know, overall occupancy in 2024 increased by 216 sites. This is same property now. For occupancy to 88%. If we fill 800 new rental homes, sell 200 new homes, I would expect an increase in overall occupancy of 600 to 700 units. You're always gonna have some turnover. You're always gonna have some obsolescence in our portfolio, so we will be removing some homes as well, which is why there's that gap there. And just thinking about it a little further, 262 units would be about a 100 basis point improvement. So, you know, that would bring us up into the low 90% range. Now we are out there looking for value-add acquisitions. They do have some more vacancy that would give us more vacant lots to fill and grow income in the future. So this pool of assets, I would say there's definitely occupancy upside, but, again, I wouldn't be surprised if we do some acquisitions that bring the overall weighted occupancy rate down.

No. I was just gonna say we believe same-store will continue to go up. It's just the overall based upon our business plan of buying value-add communities.

Okay. And now with that in mind, how should we think about the split in future acquisitions between on-balance sheet and JV? I mean, I guess, how value-add would an asset need to be for it to be better structured as a joint venture?

In a sense, we don't know the answer to that question. Okay. You know, we have the joint venture with Nuveen for development, which works extremely well for both us and Nuveen. And one of those properties, my belief is, is already profitable. We hesitate to do more new development at this moment until more, you know, we're adding earning more sales income and more rental profits. Once these three development deals are profitable, next time, we might consider doing six because it won't negatively impact our earnings as great as six would today. And then on turnaround properties, we created the Opportunity Zone Fund. If we succeed in getting that law amended so any investment in affordable housing and an opportunity zone will not pay the capital gains tax at the end of ten years, then we could do many more turnaround properties in the opportunity zone without hurting UMH Properties, Inc.'s earnings. So it goes back to our number one goal, keep increasing FFO per share so we're in a position to increase the dividend. We weigh every acquisition with that thought in mind, but those two vehicles, the Nuveen joint venture and the opportunity zone fund, give us the opportunity to increase development and rehabilitation without going away from our main goals.

Okay. Makes sense. And then last one for me, any update on the kind of single-family housing developments that were kind of potentially in the pipeline, either the one in New Jersey or any other kind of opportunities that were out there?

Sure. We recently entered into a preliminary agreement with a leading national luxury homebuilder regarding the potential formation of a JV to develop 131 acres in Vineland, New Jersey, adjacent to one of our existing communities. The parties are currently engaged in a 90-day due diligence period, during which we intend to commence preliminary discussions for approvals with the municipality. If the parties would like to proceed, then the potential JV partner would seek preliminary subdivision and site plan approval over the next two years, and they would be responsible for the cost in doing so. If the approvals are obtained, the joint venture would then be formally established. The JV partner would construct the roads, the infrastructure, the site improvements, and then sell the improved lots to an affiliate of the joint venture partner, which would construct these luxury single-family homes to sell to purchasers. UMH Properties, Inc. would contribute the real property to the JV and receive a percentage of the gross sales price of each of the homes. It's anticipated to be 20% minus certain deductions.

Okay. That was very detailed. I appreciate it. That's all for me.

Well, if I could add one more thing, the nation needs four million houses. If it needs four million houses because of the shortage, we must have four million lots. The builders in this country, they're tremendous size, and they build a lot of lots. But you're talking about a need for land, a need for approved sites. UMH Properties, Inc. has how many acres? Twenty-four hundred. We have 2,400 acres that we hope to eventually use for residential development. These are used for home manufactured housing, or if it's more valuable for single-family development, it'll be used for that. But the nation has a shortage of land, and we have always bought land that is adjacent to our existing communities. We've done that for many, many years. And we have a very nice portfolio of land that we're now putting to work.

This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Samuel Landy for any closing remarks.

Thank you. Thank you, operator. I would like to thank the participants on this call for their continued support and interest in our company. As always, Eugene, Anna, Brett, and I are available for any follow-up questions. We look forward to reporting back to you in May with our first quarter 2025 results. Thank you.

The teleconference replay will be available in approximately one hour. To access this replay, please dial US toll-free 1-877-344-7529 or international 1-412-317-0088. The conference access code is 6664574. Thank you, and please disconnect your lines.