Welcome everyone to UMC's 2009 Q3 earnings conference call. (Operator's Instructions) This conference call is now being broadcast live over the Internet. Webcast replay will be available within one hour after the conference is finished. Please visit our website, www.umc.com under the investor relations investor events section. I would like to introduce Mr. Chitung Liu, CFO of UMC. Mr. Liu, you may begin.

Thank you, operator and welcome, everyone, for joining our third quarter conference call. With me today are the CEO of UMC, Dr. Shiwei Sun and Bowen Yan, Senior IR Manager. Before beginning this conference call I would like to remind everyone of our safe harbor policy. Certain statements made during the call or as part of our discussion today may constitute forward looking statements which are based on management's current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially, including risks that may be beyond the company's control. For these risks, please refer to UMC's filing with the SEC in the US and the ROC security authorities. Now let me begin with the third quarter financial results. For the third quarter of 2009, wafer shipment rose to 1,017,000 8-inch equivalent wafers with utilization rate rising to 89%. Revenue increased 21.1% quarter over quarter to 27.41% to (inaudible) billion from $22.6 billion NT in quarter two, 2009, an increase of 10.7% year over year from $24.75 NT billion in the third quarter of 2008. Gross profit margin was 27.9% with operating margin of 15.4%. Net income in third quarter '09 was $6.09 billion NT with earnings per ordinary shares of 0.48 NT earnings per ADS was $0.075. Above is a short summary of the results in Q3 '09, more details are available now in the quarterly report which has been posted on our website. Now Dr. Sun will provide you with an update of our business and the guidance for the fourth quarter of 2009.

Thank you Chitung and thank you everyone for joining us today. We appreciate your interest in UMC. As usual I will start with a quick overview of the past quarter and then I will provide you with the guidance for the fourth quarter of 2009 before we move into the Q&A session. The positive momentum we experienced in Q2 carried over into Q3. Shipments surpassed 1 million wafers, rising to 1,017,000 8-inch equivalent wafers, the second highest number in UMC history. Revenue for Q3 was the highest it has been for the past seven quarters while gross profit margin increased to the highest level in five years. UMC is optimistic about the fourth quarter and expects ASP to rise as our product mix continues to improve. However, factors such as a seasonal adjustment and appreciation of the NT dollar maybe slightly impact our revenue in Q4. As a whole, UMC expects continued profitability from our foundry business and will be overall profitable for the year 2009. Moreover, UMC intends to distribute dividends and employee bonuses next year. Demands to process notes continued to rise in the third quarter. Revenue from 65 nm and below technologies grew by more than 40% in Q3 over Q2 with further growth anticipated in Q4. Continuing with our customer driven foundry solutions commitment, UMC is expanding 65 and 55 nm capacity and our 300 mm Fab 12i and enabling the Fab for 45 and 40 nm production capabilities. This project will increase Fab 12i's capacity by over 30% to better service customers' demands for leading edge technology. It will also allow them to mitigate geographical risks through diversification of manufacturing locations. In addition, UMC plans to substantially increase 2010 CapEx for 45 and 40 nm production capacity and will continue the 20 nm R&D equipment…

Operator, please give the Q&A instructions. Thank you.

(Operator's Instructions) Your first question comes from Donald Lu with Goldman Sachs.

Hi, good evening. My first question is on UMCJ, can you give us an update on the potential purchasing price and also in terms of price (inaudible), for example, and also the profitability of UMCJ in Q3 and Q4 this year?

Yes. Our tender of our price is 12,500 Japanese yen per share, this in comparison to the book value roughly is about 29,000 Japanese yen per share. Our Tender Officer price is about 0.45 times to the book and in terms of the book about 15,000 is actually in the form of cash, and the total amount if the 100% of the outstanding is tendered, UMC will pay up to 6.9 billion Japanese yen and the company had a big write down in asset value about a couple of months ago and now their operating position is improving with third quarter results being announced today as well. Their operating loss is about 500 million Japanese yen and their net loss is about 280 million Japanese yen. And going forward we will take some time to try to generate as much synergy as possible. And we don't have an overall outlook for Q4 yet, and UMCJ being a listed company, so far they still have their full year forecast. You can refer to their IR website please.

Okay, thanks. My second question is in terms of the demand outlook. I didn't get it completely with your comment on which sector is (inaudible) in Q4. And also, in terms of 8 to 12-inch, does the 12-inch booking remain very solid utilization at 100% into January or not?

Donald, in Q4 we were guiding consumer sector as stronger and I also mention that the computer sector is showing some weakness. Communication sector is about flat. And the second question is about — sorry, Donald, what's the second question?

Oh, I'm sorry. My second question is we have been hearing the 12-inch loading has been tight, so maybe give us color on 12 and 8-inch utilization.

Yeah. Moving into Q4 I think our 12-inch is still quite busy and quite tight, stronger than 8-inch.

Okay. Is 12-inch utilization in the 90% range?

Yes.

Okay, great. Thank you very much.

(Operator's Instructions) You have a question from the line of Sacha Kumar with Credit Suisse.

Hi. This is Visva Louie for Sacha. You indicated that CapEx and (inaudible) could be substantially higher — could be for capacity increase for Fab 12A Phase III/IV and also for Fab 12i. Can you just give us an idea about what you are thinking about CapEx growth year over year here?

So for next year’s CapEx, we will report a number in the next quarter's conference call. However, our long-term guidance for CapEx versus CapEx to sales ratio is 20%-25% in the long run. Since 2008 we have been under spending quite a bit and so we are in a catch up mode from now to 2010. The exact number will be provided at the next conference call. In terms of the expansion of capacity, 12i, which is our Singapore 12-inch Fab, we mention in our press release we will increase capacity by more than 30% over there roughly from 31K to today to 41K next year including both 65, 55, and the 45, and 40 nm capabilities and capacities. And also 12A we are certain moving forward on the 45/40 expansion, also 20 nm technology bites. Our Phase III/IV of the construction for the building has been completed. We are working on the clean-room related support facilities at this moment.

So for 2010 you would expect — can you give any idea of what (inaudible) CapEx linearity is going to be first half versus second half?

We don't have that exact number. Next time we'll provide those details.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from Dan Malkan (ph) from Moore Capital (ph).

Hi, yeah. Just on the computer segment that you talked about weakness there, what is driving the weakness in computer? And are you expecting that computer will be down sequentially in the fourth quarter?

Computer is — it depends on the definition of the computer. For us, computer segment is showing some weakness mainly on the driver IC segment.

Okay, driver IC for IT monitors?

TV, monitors — TV is actually relatively better than monitor.

Okay, but is TV in consumer or computer?

Computer. The driver IC is in computer.

Driver IC is part of computer, okay great.

There are many products for TVs, but driver is for computer segment.

Understood. And then what is driving the consumer strength for you guys?

For example, set-top box, DTV, flash controller, et cetera.

Okay, great. Thanks so much.

Your next question comes from Arthur Cho (ph) with AllianceBernstein.

More color on the progress of 45 into next year, are you seeing acceleration or pretty much the same as in terms of your prospects for 45 versus say, say months ago?

45/40 in the past quarter Q3 we shipped thousands of our 40 nm wafers. Looking to the future, (inaudible) yeah, we are very busy. We are engaging over 10 customers, very busy on the IP verification, qualification, and product level. Also we are running shadow programs. So we expect next year will be a busy year for 45/40. But in terms of a crossover, earlier you know there was 65/55, it may take some time.

And you say you should commercial production for at least half of those 10 customers you talked about maybe by the second half of next year?

It depends. Every customer's progress is different. It is not only the 45/40, it is a complicated process and design process managing and collaboration, but next year we will — I think 45/40 will be ramping up. And at this moment we are ramping 40 for a few customers already.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from Quinn Bolton with- Needham & Company. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Company: I had two questions; first, wondering if you’ve seen any significant wafer start cancellations or reductions in forecast from your customers? And then the second question, was wondering what your wafer bank inventory levels are doing? Are your customers asking you to hold greater levels of wafer bank inventory over the last month or so? Thank you.

For both questions the answer is no. We do not see any cancellations. For us there is almost no banking at all at this moment. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Company: Okay, great. Thank you.

Your next question comes from Donald Lu with Goldman Sachs.

I have a followup question on CapEx and capacity. In this year, based on your statement in the press release, your overall capacity essentially remained flat in Q1 and Q4 with a $500 million CapEx. So can you explain where the CapEx has been applied to? And also, with your (inaudible) clean-room buildup, what kind of a (inaudible) CapEx would have by the end of next year?

So the first question, the $50 million, most of the CapEx is happening in the second half of the year and it is cash based CapEx. So we say equipment lead time, everything. Also, the equipment will be released for production next year and that is probably why you see the difference. On the second question about the exact number of CapEx, we will provide that to you next quarter.

So with the treatment you installed in the second half, what would be the capacity? Is that the treatment is in 12i or 12A? What kind of capacity has been (inaudible)?

Oh okay. For the capacity profile we include many areas, 12i certainly we are expanding, 12A, I mentioned earlier 40/45 nm, 28 nm technology and even some 8-inch we are kind of aggressively expanding in specialty technology areas so it is a mixture of many things.

I guess what I am trying to get to is the CapEx intensity for each 1K wafer per month capacity at 65, 45, or 28, what would be the CapEx intensity?

You mean the per K dollar amount or?

Yes. How much is that going to increase significantly or is that not the case?

Yes. From 65 to 45 it will increase and it also depends on the process. If, for example, in the low power process other than the emerging scanner, the increase is less, but for the high performance 40 nm you are adding for the transistor enhancement like the (inaudible) laser and there is more. So it is different case by case, but that is why you are right, we tried to maximize the capital efficiency so try to have the better overlap between the two notes so we can have a better continuity in the long run. But as far as the exact dollar amount, I do not have an exact number with me.

Hmm, will you say the CapEx intensity increases more in the 10% or 20% range — is there a rough range?

Probably somewhere in between — at least it is getting more expensive, that is for sure. Also, it is a function of if you are building a (inaudible) it is very, very expensive. But if you are continuing doing the technology mix, the migration and conversion with existing built-up economics of scale, then it is much less so it is quite different. But we are certainly on the latter part.

I see, great. And for your 12-inch Fab, I think over the years the return has not been that great, but going forward with the new improved technology, et cetera is there a target for end of next year at a fully loaded basis? At 100% (inaudible) for, example, with the 12-inch are we going to improve for a certain level?

Certainly at the end of the year we are doing the business climbing — that is our target, to improve the 12-inch ROE. In the past it is not — we are going to improve the ROE from a certain number to a better target. That is for sure. And also I would like to point out that the depreciation at our first 12-inch wafer Fab, 12A, has peaked this year so at least we have the first Fab depreciation will start to come down and the different situation will be — we have two up and running 12-inch wafer Fabs where we are spending the others. So the situation should be better compared to the first or the second Fab we are ramping.

Great. And then what is the depreciation forecast for next year?

Overall we are looking for about 7%-8% year over year decline. We have two big 12-inch Fabs operating and also they are both depreciating, so supporting for the future investment and improved ROE.

Great. How is the pricing? I mean, when 8-inch Fab was fully depreciated I guess that was in 2005 or '06, the industry basically saw a step function of 8-inch price decline, do you think the 12-inch would repeat the same scenario or it's going to be very different?

For the legacy technologies, actually the price erosion is quite stable actually. It's the advanced now with the fast price erosion.

Um-hum. You mean for next year I think both UMC and the TSMC will have some 12-inch Fabs start to become fully depreciated so the depreciation burden would be reduced for both (inaudible) as well. Do you see signs that people are going to be more aggressive on 12-inch pricing next year?

I don't think that at this moment. Also, pricing is negotiated on a case by case basis with customers.

Okay, great. I mean, basically acquisition of (inaudible) and also potentially again — would the company’s profitability structure potentially change? I mean, for certain utilization across the company, would it be different in the next year too?

First of all we don't know the exact timing of full integration yet, and secondly, both our 8 and 12-inch Fabs, and our (inaudible) probably can add on about 10% of UMC's capacity by UMCJ's by half and with an 8-inch wafer facility we are very confident to integrate both operations into our 8-inch business unit of the 8-inch P&L division. So we have high hopes for the results of integration, but again, it depends on the local government requirements and it also will take a few months for UMC Japan to complete the tender so it will take awhile. I think the next quarter we probably will be able to present a more detailed plan in terms of integration.

Okay. So UMCJ will add about 5% capacity to UMC?

About 40,000 8-inch wafers per month.

Got it, great. Thanks.

Your next question comes from Bill Lu with Morgan Stanley.

Yeah. Hi, I just have one question on your gross margins. Obviously you've done a great job on cutting costs, and I just want to figure out how much more is there to go. So hypothetically if we look out a year, let's say the third quarter of 2010, you're doing the same revenues as you just did in the third quarter of this year. What do you think gross margins would be in that situation?

It's difficult to answer these hypothetical questions, but I think we continue to drive down costs, especially on input costs such as raw materials such as power, water, et cetera, which is our common daily operation. So we do believe there will be some room, at least, for the raw material and utility side. However, on the manpower and other somewhat fixed expenses, we don't believe there will be too much room. So it really depends on which part of the component you are talking about. Overall I do believe we will continue to drive down the cost, although the magnitude will be a lot smaller going forward.

Okay. If I ask that in a slightly different way, if I compare your cost of goods sold to your competitor TSMCs, depreciation you are probably 15% higher as a percentage of revenues versus the TSM. I think that is hard to change in the short term, but if I look at variable costs divided by the number of wafers (inaudible), you're actually doing better and your cost is actually lower versus TSMCs. I mean, I guess that is positive in that you're running efficiently, but does that also say the upside from there is limited?

Again, it's really component by component. As I mentioned, we do believe there is still room we can drive down the costs, and especially for raw materials and for other utility — indirect raw material, et cetera. But man power wise it is pretty much maxed out and in fact we start to budget the employee bonus so this part of the cost actually has been going up since the months of September and they are going forward as long as the company is expected to make profit we will continue to grow the employee bonus. So this part is very difficult to go down from current level.

Okay. And then if you look at the increase in manpower expenses versus the utility's materials, what will be a bigger impact going forward?

Raw material of course is negotiated with our top line revenue so hopefully the savings can still outweigh the increase so that's why I mentioned earlier we still expect to see some improvement but with a lot smaller magnitude.

Okay, great. Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from Dan Malkan with Moore Capital.

Just a question on the March quarter just in terms of your visibility, and I apologize if you answered this question already, but how much visibility do you have right now out towards the March quarter and what are you expecting relative to normal seasonality for the first quarter of 2010?

So March quarter means the calendar Q1, right?

Yes, that's right.

So next quarter's guidance will be provided next time, but in general in Q3 we look at the inventory situation. It is very much under control. Actually, many customers' inventory level is continuing to slide down a little bit so inventory — also the channel sell through has been quite good so inventory should not be an issue. So we were guiding Q4, and in Q4 the situation depends also on the year end sales. So for an even further range of forecasts there are lots of uncertainties still like year end holiday sales and also other factors like (inaudible) consumer spending situations. And we are not able to provide guidance for Q1 at this moment.

Okay. What would you — I mean, the last couple of years have been abnormal, what would you consider to be a normal Q1?

Q1, like in the past — Q4 is seasonally a slow season. For our business Q1 is similar, but as we were guiding the Q4 which his kind of flat relative to a strong Q3, so I guess this year is somewhat different and that also makes the forecast more difficult.

I see. And then just in terms of the communication side, what kind of trends have you seen in that market? Are you seeing orders accelerate? Are you seeing them slow down or are they just kind of flat lining here at the same level that they've been at the last couple of months?

It's quite stable and not bad actually. It's quite stable communication with different wireline or wireless.

Got it, understood. Thanks so much.

At this time there are no further questions in the queue. I would like to turn the conference back to over to Mr. Chitung Liu.

And with no further questions we will conclude our call today and thank you for joining us. You are more than welcome to contact us directly if you have further questions. Operator, back to you.

Thank you for your participation in UMC's conference. There will be a webcast replay within an hour. Please visit www.umc.com under the investor relations investor events section. You may now disconnect, goodbye.