Hello and welcome to the Universal Logistics Holdings First Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker for today, Mr. Tim Phillips, Universal Chief Executive Officer. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you Erika (ph). good morning and thank you for joining Universal Logistics Holdings First Quarter Earnings Call. Before we jump into the details, I want to take a moment to recognize Universal's over 12,000 associates who have worked so hard to get us to where we are today. We have believed for quite some time the earnings power of Universal was much greater than reflected in past results, and it has been a Herculean effort of these incredible team members who have gotten us to this point. While Universal continues to experience headwinds associated with the supply chain disruptions, automotive production, and talent acquisition, I remain impressed with our employees continued ability to adapt while providing an elevated level of service to our valued customer base. You are beginning to see the next level of execution that will expand our service levels and provide value to our customers and shareholders alike. Make no mistake, adding new team members to address the demands of new and existing project remains a challenge. We will focus on evaluating the expectations of our employee base and continue to shape the company to be an employer of choice in logistics and transportation. As we will outline in our remarks, performance in the first quarter of 2022 was just a glimpse of Universal hitting its stride with newly shaped contractual rates and a high level of execution. Now, for the quarter. In yesterday's release, Universal reported first quarter earnings of $1.56 per share on total operating revenues of $523.9 million. Our reported first quarter performance reflects not only record results for the first quarter, they represent Universal's highest quarterly revenues, operating margin, and earnings per share in our company's history. While first quarter was a financial win for our company, it has also brought into…

Thanks, Tim. Good morning, everyone. Universal Logistics Holdings reported consolidated net income of $42 million or a $1.56 per share on total operating revenues of $523.9 million. This compared to net income of $21.7 million or $0.80 per share on total operating revenues of $415.2 million in the first quarter of 2021. Consolidated income from operations was $57.8 million for the quarter compared to $31.2 million one year earlier. EBITDA increased $23.8 million to $75 million, which compares to $51.2 million during the same period last year. Our operating margin and EBITDA margin for the first quarter of 2022 are 11% and 14% of total operating revenues. This metric compared to 7.5% and 12.3% respectively in the first quarter of 2021. Looking at our segment performance for the first quarter of 2022 in our Contract Logistics segment, which includes our value-add and dedicated transportation businesses, income from operations increased $6.7 million to $23.5 million on $201.6 million of total operating revenues. This compares to operating income of $16.8 million on a $154.9 million of total operating revenue in the first quarter of 2021. Operating margins for the quarter were 11.6% versus 10.9% last year. As Tim mentioned in his comments, we're still experiencing some headwinds at our Detroit-based contract logistics business that we launched last year, but a relatively stable auto production environment was a favorable contributor to our contract logistics results. In our Intermodal segment, operating revenues increased $53.9 million to a $157.6 million compared to a $103.7. million in the same period last year. And income from operations increased 14.5 million to 23 million. This compares to operating income of 8.5 million in the first quarter of 2021. Operating margins for the quarter were 14.6% versus 8.2% last year. A large contributor to the segments strong performance was…

Thank you. At this time the floor is now open for questions. Again, if you would like to ask a question, . We'll pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Chris Wetherbee from Citi. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Hey, thanks. Good morning, guys. This is Eli Winski for Chris. That we could just start broad I'm just curious about what your outlook is for overall demand in 2023? You have many moving parts here in your business segments, but just curious as to your take in the out year there.

Well, I think I can give you a high-level view is you listen in this is no different than what you hear on the news is very, very hard to predict that far out in the future. The one thing we're comfortable with because of the heavy lifting we've done over the last six months, is that we really locked down a lot of our major contracts that will run over the next two to three years, allowing us to have some pricing security with some of the major operations that we are involved in. I can't give you as clear of a picture on some of the Intermodal landscape because there is a lot of uncertainty, you know, it's in the news right now but our customers on that side of it continues to give us a good read into the near future. None of them had really put anything on the table to talk about 2023 yet, but there's still -- there's still positive forecast in the second half of 2022, some of the guidance we're giving, we feel pretty comfortable, but I would feel it's pretty hard to shape 2023 yet only thing I can tell you it is we've had a favorable six months of some contract negotiation.

Sure. That makes sense. And then maybe getting a little bit more specific here. You mentioned that loads on the intermodal side were down because of some business shifts that you guys did during the quarter. And I'm sorry if I missed this on the call here, but what are you seeing on supply chain for intermodal containers? What should we expect the cadence to be for the rest of the year here?

Well, we're a little cautious, as everybody is, understanding the China COVID lockdowns and how that's going to affect the next couple months. We haven't seen any drastic pullback in freight to this point with the customer base that we're doing business with. We still see congestion on the East Coast a little bit more than there is on the West Coast. Our biggest I would say, obstacle right now on some of the locations is just the equipment, both our trucks being able to turn x amount of loads per day, which I've mentioned that is down to the lowest level. And then customers holding on to the equipment at warehouses, which means we don't have a chassis to take back in and get that next import load. And I think that you'll see a -- of course when China lifts the COVID lockdown, you'll see a Russia freight that's going to hit our way. We're -- I think we're positioned well. Number one on the intermodal side, we're all major ports around the United States, so we'll be able to capture that, whether they take the freight bound for the United States and push it through the West Coast or try to evaluate maybe an East Coast unloading. We're positioned well. I think we're positioned as well as we can be with our own chassis availability. The only trump card is what's going to be available in the marketplace from an outside provider standpoint, and does our customers and warehouses have labor in the right frame that they can unload it in an expeditious fashion, be able to push the freight through. So I'm expecting -- I'm cautious in the next two months, but I expect the second half of the year on the Intermodal drayage side to have some consistent volumes with the customer base that we're dealing with.

Sure. Got it. One more for me, and that's just on purchased transportation expense. So normal seasonality looks like it goes up more than 1Q, but how should we be thinking about the PT here throughout into 2Q, and then throughout the rest of the year.

Well, I think from a -- not from a decimal point in dollar amount, maybe Jude can probably speak a little more of that, but I think -- let's look at this, let's level that and look at what we've done over the last year. We've taken and looked at all of our driver based around the country, we performed the market analysis, we've raised rates accordingly to make sure that we can attract the drivers that we're looking for, and equally so on the contractors side. We've elevated point-to-point rates or, if it's a contract around a percentage rate agreement, he or she experience the new rates that we've been able to charge the customer. So I feel pretty comfortable that from a purchase transportation standpoint, that you -- what you're seeing now is what you're going to get going forward into the second quarter and beyond.

Got it. Thanks a lot, guys. Appreciate it.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Bruce Chan from Stifel. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hey. Good morning, and appreciate the question as always. I guess, first Tim, you spoke a lot about the benefits that you're seeing on the top-line in terms of surcharges and then some of these assessorials. Wonder if you can maybe speak to the resilience of those as we move later into the year and move into next year. Maybe when you think about the various segments, where are you in terms of how much of the book is priced at current market levels and how long do you think they can stay that way?

Well, let's unpack Intermodal because I think you had actually posed the question a couple of quarters ago about where we were from an accessorial charge to our customers. We rationalized that over the latter part of the year and yet maybe we were a little bit late to the dance on a few of them, really buckled down. And I think what we've really done is take a look at it and I think there's fair accessorial charges to -- for what's going on in the marketplace. We see the customers -- The costumer's given us this read on the Intermodal side. They haven't pulled back on any rate, and they continue to pay accessorial such as congestion fee. Even more so on some of the -- I wouldn't say host fee type situations, but when the equipment gets pent up at warehouse, we've even seen the appetite even for escalating accessorial charge to remunerate for that asset bidding. So I think the customers are really cautious knowing the fact that we've got us a little bit of a wall now. And we know that we have this big glut break and when China does open up, that should probably push our way. So I'm saying that I'm cautious, we're going to be stable over the next couple of months, but I feel that these types of intermodal accessorial will hold going forward. On the truckload and brokerage side, our rate levels with our -- our contractual rate levels with our customers have held well, the accessorials or traditional accessorials we've moved with the market. And I have heard no noise and I don't foresee in the foreseeable future those accessorials coming back down. I think we're priced favorably and fair and I think the word from the customer so far is they understand that there could be constraints to capacity and equipment as this year progresses, we finish 2022 and going into 2023.

Okay. That's great color and point taken on the China COVID lockdowns. So maybe just to follow-up on that point and the potential for a glut as you called it, or maybe a freight embolism if I could switch it over to you, when you think about the guidance for the rest of the year, does that factor in and you have that China COVID freight surge potential or maybe the potential for more slowdowns related to the ILWU negotiations?

Yeah. I think a little bit of it. I mean, if you just look at -- I mean first of all, we just we just raised our guidance by $200 million for the year. I think we're taking into account the fact that not only is there still a robust rate environment out there for our service lines. And also, there's still some opportunity for price if this freight or freight embolism, as you just mentioned, actually occur. That's reflected in the updated guidance. We're not really sure yet if this is going to be a permanent thing where we can execute above our target margins, which were in that 8% to 10% range. But obviously there's going to be some quarters that we're going to be able to exceed that based on the market conditions. And of course, based on if we can continue to attract and retain drivers to drive some additional volume into the business. I think we took that into consideration, but obviously, we provide a peek into the next quarter, every quarter on these calls. And so for our Q2 calls will definitely update that guidance again, if need be, to reflect the conditions at that time.

Okay. That's great. That's really helpful. And then maybe just to finish off, Tim, wondering if you can give us some broad color on how the ULH model works in a more normal cyclical downturn. Because I think when investors look in the past couple of years, we saw some pretty unique maybe once in a generation type events unfold, as far as facility lockdowns in logistics, for example. But I would think that that's pretty atypical when it comes to business cycle changes. So maybe if you can just give us a sense in terms of how the business fairs over a more normal type of freight pullback.

Yes. I think that if you look at ULH as a whole and you impact some of the different service lines, we know we have about 30% of our biggest price sensitivity and possibilities of swings in the brokerage and truckload group. Although, we haven't seen it now, we know that there's some exposure there. I'll go back to where we started. We still have, you know, 40% of our business is still through the contract logistics model, which is just what it says, its contracted long-term rates with our customers. And what we've done over the past two years is we really leveraged our sales on the intermodal side to equally go after BC of the beneficial cargo owner, making sure that we're looking at high volume stable accounts that will go with market fluctuations or the economy. That's one thing that I think that -- the good and bad of that we've focused on it. We also locked out maybe a little bit on the spot market on the Intermodal side because we had, but we've done that intentionally to take into account regular business cycles so we can perform at a consistent nature on Intermodal side.

Okay, great. Thanks for the color. Appreciate the time.

Thanks, Bruce. Appreciate it.

There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the call over back to Mr. Phillips for closing remarks.

Thank you, Erika. Appreciate everybody dialing in. I'm super excited about where we just drove through, and equally excited about what we're driving into, and I look forward to another positive call for quarter 2. Thank you and take care.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.