Good day, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Universal Electronics' fourth quarter and full year 2014 results conference call. [Operator instructions.] I would now like to turn the conference to our host, Ms. Becky Herrick of LHA. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and thank you all for joining us for the Universal Electronics fourth quarter and full year 2014 conference call. By now, you should have received a copy of the press release. If you have not, please contact LHA at 415-433-3777. This call is being broadcast live over the Internet. A webcast replay will be available for one year at www.uei.com. Also, any additional updated material nonpublic information that might be discussed during this call will be provided on the company’s website, where it will be retained for at least one year. You may also access that information by listening to the webcast replay. After reading a short Safe Harbor statement, I will turn the call over to management. During the course of this conference call, management may make projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future financial performance of the company, including the benefits anticipated by the company due to the continued strength across its entire business and the expansion of its share of the markets it serves, including its subscription broadcast business and the smart device channel; the continuation and expansion of benefits the company has experienced and anticipates due to the licensing of the company’s technologies and patents such as the company’s smart device and QuickSet technologies; the successes anticipated by management from the global growth expected in consumer electronics, particularly in the Asian mobile markets; the continued adoption and selection of the company’s technologies and products by the world’s largest companies in the home entertainment industry; the continued innovation of next-generation solutions that are accepted by the company's customers and end users; management's continued ability to identify and execute on opportunities that maximize shareholder value, including the effects that repurchasing the company's shares have on the company's stock value; the continued…

Thank you, Becky. Our fourth quarter financial results reflect the strong performance across our entire business. Net income grew 29% compared to the fourth quarter of 2013. This closes out another record year for UEI. We grew operating income 20% and net income 27% over the previous year. While 2014 represents the most successful year in UEI history, it’s important to note that it simply adds to our long term track record of profitable growth. In fact, we have achieved a 15% EPS growth rate compounded over the last 10 years. Our focus on providing an easier, more intuitive control interface for the consumer yields innovative products and technologies that are adopted by industry leading companies around the world. This trend continued in the fourth quarter. Subscription broadcasting remained a solid performer, as we deepened relationships with our existing customers while adding new ones. Comcast, Charter, Cox, Cablevision, and AT&T all introduced new products into the market during the quarter, driving strong sales throughout the Americas. At the International Consumer Electronics Show in January, we announced that Comcast chose UEI to supply its new XFINITY voice control that will be released this year. The new remote uses voice commands to help consumers find what they want faster, from changing channels to getting recommendations on what to watch and more. This new remote is powered by our advanced control technology that enables easy home setup and configuration. Robust television sales worldwide supported our OEM performance during the year. According to Display Search, worldwide television shipments gained momentum in every quarter of 2014, demonstrating 7% year over year growth in shipments, which is expected to continue into 2015. Reflecting the strengthening trends, we realized an increase in shipments to OEM customers around the world, including Samsung and Panasonic. Our embedded software solutions…

Thank you, Paul. As a reminder, our results for the fourth quarter and full year 2014 as well as the same periods in 2013 will reference adjusted pro forma metrics. Fourth quarter 2014 net sales were $138.4 million, compared to $136.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2013. Business category net sales were $120.7 million, compared to $117.2 million. Consumer category net sales were $17.7 million, compared to $18.9 million. Gross profit was $41.9 million, or 30.3% of sales, compared to a gross margin of 30% in the fourth quarter of 2013. Total operating expenses were $29.1 million for both the fourth quarters of 2014 and 2013. Breaking down our operating expenses, R&D expense was $4.3 million, compared to $3.9 million as we continue to invest in product innovations and technologies such as QuickSet 3.0 and Control Plus. SG&A expenses were $24.8 million compared to $25.2 million. Operating income was $12.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2014, an increase of 9% when compared to $11.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. The effective tax rate was 15.6% compared to 23.8%. Net income for the fourth quarter of 2014 was $11.3 million or $0.70 per diluted share, compared to $8.8 million or $0.55 per diluted share in the fourth quarter of 2013. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, net sales were $562.3 million, up 6% compared to $529.4 million in 2013. Gross margin was 29.8% compared to 28.8%. Total operating expenses were $115.3 million compared to $108.7 million in 2013. Operating income was $52.5 million, an increase of 20%, when compared to $43.9 million in 2013. Net income increased by 27% to $41.1 million or $2.55 per diluted share, compared to $32.4 million or $2.08 per diluted share in the prior year period. Next, I’ll review cash flow and balance sheet at December 31, 2014. We ended the quarter with cash and cash equivalents of $112.5 million compared to $76.2 million at December 31, 2013. DSOs were approximately 64 days at December 31, 2014, compared to 63 days the year prior. Net inventory turns were approximately 4.1 turns at December 31, 2014, compared to 3.8 turns a year prior. Now turning to our guidance, for the first quarter of 2015, we expect revenue between $133 million and $141 million compared to last year’s first quarter revenue of $129.8 million. EPS for the first quarter is expected to range from $0.41 to $0.51 per diluted share, compared to $0.40 recorded for the first quarter of 2014. Reaffirming our long term financial outlook, we expect average annual sales growth of 5% to 10% and average earnings growth of 10% to 20%. I’d now like to turn the call back to Paul.

Thanks, Bryan. We believe we are better positioned than ever to continue our long term track record of strong financial performance, as well as providing the innovative products and technologies that anticipate the trends in the industry. We remain true to our strategy and we have continued to deliver record results. As always, we are focused on winning new customers, expanding relationships with existing customers, and deepening our penetration of new markets and geographies. UEI has established itself as the market leader in wireless control technology. Our industry leading technical expertise positions us to continue to gain share in the home entertainment control market worldwide. While we have much to celebrate in our accomplishments to date, we strongly believe the best is yet to come. Stay tuned. I’d now like to open it up for questions. Operator?

[Operator instructions.] And our first question comes from Steven Frankel of Dougherty & Company.

So, the revenue growth in the last couple of quarters has been at the lower end of expectations, but you’re forecasting a nice rebound in Q1. What gives you that confidence?

We’ve got a backlog [unintelligible] to a certain degree, so it’s not like we’re going in completely blind in the first quarter. And also, in terms of the back half, you’re right, the back half growth was a little slower than the first half, but if you look at the history of us at our company, it’s not as if the growth is always ratable throughout the year. It varies, and the back half was a little lighter than the front half, but that’s not a harbinger of things to come, and you see that rebound in the first quarter.

And are you guys vulnerable at all to these West Coast port problems? Or have you rerouted your goods to someplace else?

We had to reroute, so we are vulnerable, but we had to reroute to Seattle and through other ports. So it’s a little more costly, but we circumvented the problem.

And Paul, on this QuickSet 3.0, when should we expect to start seeing that showing up on products in the marketplace? And are there any set top boxes that are out today that would be field upgradable for your customers?

The answer is, QuickSet 3.0, you should expect to see it this year in products. I can’t give you the exact date, for a variety of reasons, but we are obviously in discussions with many customers about implementation. Our expectation would be this year. And yes, some of the products that are in the field are in fact field upgradable.

You named off a list of Chinese handsets. Could you just give me how many manufacturers did you have last quarter, and then what’s the total for this quarter that you have as customers?

I think we added just one this quarter, but some of the ones we announced last quarter began shipping. Some had shipped already when we mentioned it last quarter, some hadn’t. So this is one of the things where we add the customer name, but over time, what you expect to have happen, and I don’t mean over months, I mean over months and years, you expect more and more of their models or SKUs to carry the feature. And that’s much like we’ve seen in AV over the last two decades. We start with a SKU, and then it goes to three, and then it goes to more. Our expectation is to, over time, win more and more models.

And how many manufacturers do you have now?

Four.

Our next question comes from Ian Corydon from B. Riley & Company.

The Q1 EPS guidance at the low end implies not much change from Q1 of 2014. Can you just talk about why that would be, given the revenue growth that you expect to see?

It’s just a range. We always range it by about $8 million. And if you take the midpoint, we’re showing growth of up to 6%. So we always range it. For 2015. So we always put a range, because you never know. But I wouldn’t look necessarily at the bottom of the range. I’d probably look in the middle.

And in terms of the tax rate, it varied a lot between the first half and the second half. Can you just talk about what dynamics impact that tax rate? And then maybe you could help us by telling us what kind of tax rate you’re thinking about for the first quarter.

Yeah, the reason the back half is lower is mainly in Q4, the federal R&D credit, it passed in Q4. And it was pretty sizable, it was about $840,000 for us in the fourth quarter. Last year, if you look at 2013, the federal R&D credit passed in Q1, so we were able to take that credit ratably throughout the year, where in 2014, it basically all hit in Q4.

And then, so for 2015, do we expect it to be more ratable?

They passed it for one year, so for 2015, we’re not going to be able to take the credit until it passes, the first probably two or three quarters. I won’t be able to bake it into the provision, the tax rate.

The simple answer, Ian, is no. [laughs] We have to presume that the federal R&D tax credit will not pass until it does.

And if it doesn’t pass, your tax rate is going to be more like 25%? And if it does pass, it will be more like 20%? Is that right?

It would be low 20s. If you were to put in low 20s for the first two or three quarters, you’ll be fine.

And then I know there’s a bunch of moving parts in the business, but any reason for the sequential decline in gross margin from Q3 to Q4? And if you can just talk about the dynamics that impact that, that might help us think about how to model.

Yeah, it’s mainly mix. In Q4, you’ll see we have two 10% customers, so we sold a lot of goods to large customers. And what that does is it puts downward pressure on the gross margin rate. It improves the operating income. So if you look at it, our licensing actually grew Q4 2013 to Q4 2014, but we did sell a lot to some large customers, as evidenced by the fact that we had two 10% customers.

Our next question comes from Jason Ursaner from CJS Securities.

Just maybe staying with that last point, wondering if you could talk a little bit how the chips into the embedded mobile market played into the results in terms of sales and gross margin specifically, if you kind of parse out the two different 10% customers.

Yeah, we don’t break out the mobile dollars specifically, Jason, but as Bryan just stated, there’s growth in our connected products, products that have two-way capability, including mobile. The gross margin was still up. It was 30.3. It was higher than in the prior year. But the hardware sales to larger customers, when they make up a higher percent of the mix than we anticipated, that can make the gross margins slightly lower than they would have otherwise been. So if we have a really good quarter with a large customer that’s buying hardware products at lower than company average gross margin, it will pull the gross margins down, but the earnings is obviously powerful. That’s why the income was up strongly year over year.

No, I understand. I guess I’m also trying to understand, you had announced a couple of major customer wins, Microsoft for the Xbox One, Samsung for the Galaxy, in previous quarters. And obviously, there’s a cycle with selling in the launch and then more of a steady state. And I’m not asking you any specific product cycle, but I guess I’m trying to understand how that cycle looks for you guys from a sales and margin perspective over a two, three, four quarter view, because obviously in your pipeline, those customers are adding SKUs, adding new launches, that I guess I would assume you’re going to be a part of in the future. So trying to understand how that works.

Sure. The way the product cycle works in almost all of our businesses, with the exception of subscription broadcasting, because sometimes they can have platforms that come out every few months, but again, they then don’t redo that platform for sometimes two to three years. In mobile, and even in television, it’s once a year. They typically will refresh the line once a year. Now, as far as changes between Q4 of last year and this year, Xbox was actually in both quarters, in Q4 of 2014 as well as Q4 of 2013. It was its first quarter. We won’t obviously give specific numbers on that, but it was in both years. But the way generally this works is the TV cycle is once annually, and it’s typically sometime in the spring, the new models. And then the mobile varies. Some companies are in the spring, some are in the fall, but it’s usually once a year that they do the design of SKUs and selection of vendors for those SKUs.

And just overall sales in the business category, maybe qualitatively, could you talk about performance from the TV market and OEMs during the holiday period versus the cable market? Were both of them 10% customers in cable?

The 10% customers were both [unintelligible] broadcasting. They were DirecTV and Comcast.

And just the TV market in general, any characterization of that for the holiday period?

There was growth in the TV market. Our sales from Asia into the OEMs, we showed growth year over year, and the licensing was up as well.

And last one for me, on the cash flow, you had a sizable inflow for both the quarter and full year in payables and accrued expenses. Just wondering if anything specific drove this and sort of where you see it trending.

No, we just kind of stretched out our vendors a little bit, to be honest with you. So I think we’ll maintain that same cycle in 2015.

Our next question is a follow up from Steven Frankel of Dougherty & Company.

Given that so much of the consumer business is based in Europe, what kind of FX headwinds did you have there, and what might you have in 2015?

In Q4, the consumer was down about $1 million, and if we would have used the same exchange rates from the prior year quarter, it would have been about flat. So call it a million dollar effect on sales. And then for 2015, it really all depends on how FX rates play out. Right now, they’re low. And the euro’s I think about $1.12, $1.13, so from a sales perspective, if they stay at that rate, then it adversely affects us on the top line. Although we also have expenses in euros as well, so there’s a natural hedge there. Bottom line, it’s not that big an effect, but it can affect the top line.

And then going back to the gross margin question that we’re all fascinated with, have we seen the biggest move in gross margin from your business transformation, or are we still in the early part of this shift to software and embedded?

Well, that’s a difficult one to answer, to be honest with you, because again, we have a lot of sales presence globally on the hardware side, and certainly we’re not going to have the people who sell hardware here stop. To the extent a customer comes in with a deal that could be sizable at a 26% margin, that would strongly bolster earnings, we certainly wouldn’t walk away from that, even though it would potentially cause some gravity effect on gross margin. But we like to focus on earnings and cash flow, obviously, as all businesses who want to drive value should. And I’m not saying that we aren’t concerned about gross margins, but to the extent the growth rate in hardware continues to be strong, it will bring some pressure on gross margin to not grow as quickly as it otherwise could, if we simply said we’re only going to go forward selling licenses, because then our gross margin’s way up, because the margins on some of these licenses are obviously 100%. But we have a strong, thriving hardware business. We are converting customers to some of the advanced features that we’re offering, things like QuickSet, even QuickSet 3.0. Some of the customers may choose us for the hardware side of that equation, which will mean the gross margins, while they’ll be stronger than they otherwise would have been, to the extent you’re working with large customers and can achieve strong growth and profits at gross margins of 28% on certain deals, we’ll probably take those deals. So it’s hard for us to predict exactly how that will work even in a quarter. We have customers that are buying at 27 points and they want to buy an extra million units, we’re going to ship them, because it’s great for our company. It does pull the gross margin percentage down a little bit, but the gross margin dollar effect is strong.

All right, let me try to go at this one other way, which is if you’re successful in selling QuickSet 3.0 to a lot of your traditional customers, shouldn’t that in general raise your gross margin profile, because you’re going to have a higher software content?

Yes. That’s correct.

So that’s the bet [unintelligible].

QuickSet 3.0, its successors, because again, QuickSet started at 1.0, so presumably there’ll be a 3.1 and probably other point releases on three, and even a QuickSet 4. But as we increase the ability for consumers to easily and automatically set up their AV stack and operate it through both remotes and software that arrives on second screens, there’s a lot of opportunities for margin capture in all of those markets. And presumably, that brings your margins up over time, as it moves more towards that. But to the extent our sales group is selling hardware along with it, there’s a downward pressure and in the balance of those over the last year, we’ve raised our gross margins by a full point over the prior year.

[Operator instructions.] Our next question comes from Josh Goldberg of G2 Investment Partners.

Just a couple of things. One is you said you had two 10% customers. What percentage? How much was that roughly, each of them, for the quarter?

DirecTV was 10% and Comcast was 10.5%.

And I guess some people on the call are a little concerned about the gross margin numbers in the first quarter. Just in terms of looking back every year, it seems like your gross margins are always the worst in the first quarter and then kind of grow as the year grows. I’m not asking you to give guidance for the rest of the year, but implied in your revenue and earnings would be a margin number, call it 29%, for the first quarter, which is up from last year’s March quarter. Do you feel comfortable to say that as the year progresses your gross margins continue to grow? I know there’s obviously some big deals out there and opportunities on the hardware side, but it just looks like based on the last couple of years, that your margins kind of pick up as the year progresses. And I have a follow up.

Yeah, historically that’s true. It all depends on the future. It’s difficult to predict quarters out because as we talked about, just the mix. Even if we embed our technologies, whether it’s in a form of a pure licensing arrangement or via onboard a chip, or through a full remote, it obviously changes in the gross margin percentages. And also then, if you back out the embedded technologies, just taking a look at traditional remotes, it would be the mix between large customers and smaller customers, etc. So it really depends. But what you’re saying is historically true.

And you talked about last quarter that your revenue suffered a little bit. You felt that the U.S. business was a little bit softer than what you had hoped. And it sounds like foreign exchange hurt you a little bit this quarter. When you look at kind of the revenue number, sort of in the middle of the range, what else sort of didn’t fall into place as you expected?

Well, we came in right in the middle, so there’s really nothing that I’d say I wouldn’t expect.

There was a million dollar headwind, though, on foreign exchange.

Right, which actually hurt us. That means we would have been a million higher. So I thought the quarter was solid. We came in the middle of the range. We had some headwinds with consumer because of the FX rates, but we made up for it in the business category. So I don’t think there’s really much for me to say in terms of what didn’t happen. I think we had a solid quarter.

And there are no further questions at this time. I will now turn it back to Paul Arling for closing remarks.

Okay, thanks, everybody, for joining us today and for your continued interest in our company. We did want to announce that coming up next month, we’ll be participating in the Deutsche Bank 2015 Media, Internet, and Telecom Conference in Florida on March 9 and the Piper Jaffray Technology, Media, and Telecom Conference in New York on March 10. We hope to see you at one or both of these events. Thanks for joining us today. Goodbye.